Log in



Categories » ‘Politics’

More Specious BS From the “Bar”

December 14th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/more-specious-bs-from-bar.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Larry Becraft and his side-kick Bob Hurt have been spreading this around the internet attempting to keep those dollars rolling into their coffers and discredit me at the same time:

https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InternetOrders/DocumentViewer.aspx?IndexSearchableOrdersID=108275

Some friends brought it to my attention and asked what happened, so here’s my official reply:

Well, nothing happened to it or with it, of course, because it involves two federal PERSONS and not me nor my husband at all. Wake up! I went to the Tax Court without ever “petitioning” it or allowing it to assume any jurisdiction related to me or my husband, and they were made to look ridiculous in front of the 62 lawyers they had brought in for the event.

I then turned around and posted my $12 million dollar judgment against them and the IRS in the land jurisdiction records. The difference is that they hold a delegated authority from me, but I hold the actual and supreme non-delegated authority over them. So I am turning over my judgment against them to the Marines for enforcement, as the international land jurisdiction is their “beat”.

You have to get it really, REALLY straight in your mind who you are and what you are and where the jurisdictional lines are, and then you can go in and stomp all over these rats with impunity.

My husband and I officially revoked our “election to pay” federal income taxes back in 1998. You will note a typical trick in this paper-fraud case. We revoked under our actual Given Names — James Clinton Belcher and Anna Maria Riezinger, so what the Federales did (and this is typical) is that they pretended that “Anna M. Riezinger-von Reitz” was a new federal PERSON they could glom onto and pretend that the revocation of election didn’t apply to “HER”—-but of course, I just turned around and revoked “HER” election to pay federal income taxes, too, and shoved it all back up their butts.

The US TAX COURT comes to Anchorage, Alaska, once a year in June. There were two cases – mine and an elderly black woman from Fairbanks, Alaska, who appeared using a walker to get around.

We were the only two cases on the docket and the room was absolutely packed full, standing room only. They had extra bailiffs and police on hand, as if these two elderly women were going to be a big problem.

The other lady’s case came first. She had the misfortune of having her house burn down along with all her records in it. Like many other Alaskans, she received a Permanent Fund Dividend the prior October, her house burned down in the winter, and by springtime and the April 15th filing date, she couldn’t remember exactly how much the dividend was, so she made an honest guess and was off by a hundred dollars or so.

The sanctimonious ass on the “bench” threw the book at her, charging her with crimes and perjury because her 1040 wasn’t absolutely accurate and fined her up one side and down the other so that she suddenly owed twenty times what the entire dividend had been and on and on and on. She was in shock and tears.

And the vermin in the room were in awe, staring at that judge like he was God Almighty.

And next, he turned to me and thought it was all going to go his way with me, too. The Bar Members were all gathered around like wolves on the hunt, leaned over in their chairs, eager to watch him dispatch me in the same way, but instead, I avoided their usual tricks, didn’t identify myself as “the NAME” and stated right up front for the record that I wasn’t a “Petitioner” and that I didn’t “understand” anything that they were alleging and didn’t agree to any of their proceedings. Period.

Also, I said that I knew for sure that I wasn’t a Warrant Officer in the Merchant Marine Service known as a Withholding Agent and if there was any evidence that either I or my husband held such a position, they better bring it forward right now.

And things went south for them rapidly from that moment on. It would after all be a felony crime for me to impersonate an officer of a foreign government, and it would also be a felony crime for any officer of the court to knowingly address a foreign national and solicit them to commit perjury.

I nailed the judge’s sweating butt to his chair and though he huffed and puffed he couldn’t blow my house down and he had no signature authority based on the evidence, so both he and his Clerk went home hungry to bed and all the attorneys were most let down and discomfited. They shuffled out with backward glances, downcast eyes, and sat through my testimony on the matter with their heads down like bad school boys caught by the teacher.

After the fact the “judge” issued his “order” against the federal PERSONS, but it was meaningless and unenforceable, because I simply wrote two new letters to the Commissioner(s) of the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service revoking the “presumed” election of “ANNA M. RIEZINGER-VON REITZ” to pay federal income taxes, too, and made it effective prior to any of the years they were trying to collect upon.

So their fraudulent paperwork remains on the court record, but it has no force or effect.

Fiction can never stand against properly stated and evidenced fact. And I am a fact that the fraud artists definitely don’t want to contend with.

Afterward I met the elderly black woman and her friend in the courtyard outside the courthouse and explained to them exactly what they needed to do to make the US TAX COURT beat feet back to WASHINGTON, DC.

I don’t know what happened to her appeal, but I have reason to hope that she served them back with an Equal Civil Rights Claim and that she also reclaimed the copyright to all variations of her Given Name so that the vermin couldn’t just play more word games and come after her again.

That was all before I got serious about claiming up absolutely every possible variation and permutation and order and punctuation and style and format and font of both my given name and my Pen Name, so the IRS continued to come back and try to attack all sorts of variations of my Name/NAMES, and I continued to revoke election to pay for each and every one of them. Since there are a lot of variations possible with a name like mine, we had quite a correspondence before I nailed their feet permanently to the floor.

I now know that I could have saved myself that paperwork if I had just done a proper Certificate of Assumed Name and claimed all my Names/NAMES at once, but hey, it does have the halcyon affect that the IRS/Internal Revenue Service has registered letters from me revoking election to pay for every single variation of my Name/NAME.

Nowadays, I just spit like Clint Eastwood if I see them coming.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

How Many Times Do I Have to Say This? + No China Does Not Own California

December 13th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/how-many-times-do-i-have-to-say-this.html?utm

_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramer

feedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29


By Anna Von Reitz

Day after day after day I get all these complaints, all these awful stories of abuse, all these claims of wrong-doing by the “federal government” and — every day, I give everyone the tools to defend themselves from the “presumption” of “federal citizenship” that is the “enabling clause” of all these abuses and problems.

I have given you all more than enough instruction and information to remove yourself and your name and estate from these evil legal presumptions.  These are weapons of defense — means to protect yourself and your assets:

 

  1. Authenticate copies of “your” Birth Certificate.  Study what I have told you about what this document is and how it is used, so that you can competently claim to be the living and fully insured “Subrogee”;
  2. Record your common law copyright and standing writ of habeas corpus as part of issuing a Certificate of Assumed Name, claiming all right and interest in all the different variations of your Given Name back to the day you were born and claiming their permanent domicile on the land and soil of the state where you were born;
  3. Correct the deed and title of land and homes and other property held in your name so that it is clearly identified as private non-taxable property and rename it under your own copyright-signed designation like: “111101 Pine Court (c)” instead of whatever street or lot and block or other description is being used now;
  4. Order “Z” (as in Regulation Z of the Motor Vehicle Code) license plates for your car to establish that it is private property, too, and exempt from federal regulation;
  5. Put “retired” labels on all passports and driver licenses,etc., clearly establishing that you are not functioning as a federal citizen now;
  6. Check into your family history, and if possible, demonstrate using public records— births, deaths, census, marriages, etc. — stand ready to prove who you are and where you come from;
  7. Download and print a copy of  Pamphlet 27-1-161-1 “The Law of Peace” from the website we shared and have it ready to present if you are ever forced to appear in one of THEIR courts and demand that you are addressed properly as a peaceful non-combatant and non-citizen national of these actual, factual United States of America.  Invoke the standing writ of habeas corpus contained in your Certificate of Assumed Name and present the authenticated Birth Certificate for collection of the bounty on the federal PERSON;
  8. Revoke your “election to pay” federal income taxes by giving notice to the Commissioners of the IRS and the Internal Revenue Service.
  9. Make Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury, responsible to you as the Fiduciary responsible for the administration of the federal PERSON— thereby denying any such position to the local Court Clerk;
  10. Post your own Private Indemnity Bond with the U.S. Treasury or take shelter under the bond established for your State of the Union.

You need to defend yourselves and correct your own records and bring home the facts in a way that these yahoos can’t ignore or side-step.

And you need to establish your claims to your own names, estates, and political status.

There is nothing so difficult about this once you grasp the fact that what you thought of as “your” government is just a foreign contractor here to provide governmental services.  It’s a foreign corporation like TARGET — with no granted authority over you or your property, but if you don’t correct the public records and rebut their false claims, they will be happy to impose their rules and their government upon you.

Get moving.  Now.  Save yourselves and save your country!

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com


 No China Does Not Own California

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/no-china-does-not-own-california.html

By Anna Von Reitz

There is an obnoxious video/email going around the circuit claiming that China “owns” California.  I am not sorry at all that this isn’t true, but like most lies, it does contain a kernel of buried truth.  Consider what I am going to tell you now very carefully:

No, China does not own California.  CHINA may own the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, which is a different matter entirely… Oh, and for everyone’s information, we, the actual United States of America (unincorporated) own the UNITED STATES, INC., which owns CHINA.

I hope that you are all now suitably confused and aroused and want to know what is really happening.

Most of the speculation can be set at rest.  The vermin centered in portions of California are being “burned out” — unfortunately many innocent people and their property remain in harm’s way.  Bear in mind that those targeted have been instrumental in embezzling the entire “National Credit” owed to the American states and people, and that they have committed many crimes “in the name of” their own victims, so that the rest of the world is angry at us and mistaking us as the source of their problems.

What is interesting to me about this, is that these criminals—most of whom don’t have a clue that they are involved in anything criminal— are being targeted by their own masters, the top leadership of their own cabal has ordered their extermination in order to destroy the records of all the crimes and false accounting that has gone on.  They are literally burning down their own offices and records stashes.  Just as they burned whole libraries in Germany.  Just as they torched the Library in Alexandria.  Just as they set fire to Washington, DC, during the War of 1812 to try to cover up the truth about the Titles of Nobility Amendment and the frauds of their central bank at that time.

More of the same.  Some things never change.  This is how “they” do things—- they turn on their own servants and co-opted business partners and seek to destroy the records of their crimes.  But guess what?  It’s all been captured and downloaded and distributed already.

It’s a brilliant strategy so long as people remain deceived and think that these criminals either are us or represent us as agents.

When the Truth comes out and it becomes known that we have been the victims of the same criminals, the worm turns.  Suddenly, people can see the two distinct groups identified in the Treaty of Paris (1783) and also in the actual Constitution— and they are then able to wrap their heads around the fact that these rats have been working a fraud scheme against their employers (us, the American states and people) at the same time that they have been fomenting wars and pillaging and promoting crime and immorality in other countries “in our names”— disgracing our flag and our nation abroad while secretively pillaging us at home.

And that, dear hearts, is what is actually, factually going on.  The whole world is waking up and realizing that this is not a political problem.  This is a matter of international crime and crime syndicates masquerading as lawful governments, of armed commercial mercenaries pretending to be soldiers, and of “evil in high places”.  As usual, the Bible described it best.

Time to wise up and buckle down and pass the word by word of mouth so that everyone everywhere finally knows what is going on—-on the streets and in the cities, on the motorways and byways, here and abroad, within the military community and among the civilians and here at home in the actual, factual America, too.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Here Are the Smoking Guns Mr Trump….

December 12th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/here-are-smoking-guns-mr-trump.html?utm_

source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramer

feedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

By Anna Von Reitz

Well, folks, for all those who have pooh-poohed what I have been teaching about jurisdiction and the fact that the American People have been bamboozled and mistreated by their own employees— the members of Congress and the military— we now have the definitive proof in their own words: Pamphlet 27-161-1 from the War Department/Department of the Army.  

https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/law-of-peace_Vol-1.pdf

This “little” document, only 232 pages, was supposed to be widely distributed to the public and to the court system back in 1959 — and wasn’t.  Please notice the title, “The Law of Peace”. 

This is what the dirty bastards have owed to the American states and people since 1860 and what they have deliberately withheld on false pretenses so that they could justify creating “public trusts” in our names and then raping and pillaging those public trusts. 

It’s not just the filthy crooked Congress.  It’s the filthy crooked military leadership as well.  This has not taken place in a vacuum.  They knew what they owed us.  They knew what they were supposed to be doing.  And here is the proof— published and in their own words, with their own document numbers.

Again– https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/law-of-peace_Vol-1.pdf

Read it and weep! 

And as for me, I am totally justified.  Everything I said.  Everything I told you.  The jurisdictions.  The citizens.  The nationals.  All of it.  Black and white.  Take that, Larry Becraft.  Take that, Bob Hurt.  Stuff it, American Bar Association. 

The ABA has been nothing but a worthless self-perpetuating crime syndicate on our shores, a “professional” fellowship for pirates engaged by foreign governments for the express purpose of pillaging innocent people–and then using the ill-gotten gains to go pillage more innocent people throughout the world.   

All the “law” schools in this country might as well be burned down or turned into hospices. 

And all the military schools, too.  We have somehow perpetuated a military that speaks of honor and has none. 

Our own military has sunk lower than the worst kind of Third World junta, and they have less excuse, because they have had the trust and power and wealth and education and privilege to do things according to the actual law and according to their oaths and they have failed us.  They have failed the entire world.

When I read this document in their own words part of me wanted to explode with satisfaction: here at last, unequivocally, flatly, in the flesh, is the proof of all that I have said and proof that they knew it, too, tied up and wrapped with a bow.  

And the other part of me wanted to find a bathroom and retch, because what this also proves is the extent of the corruption that has infested not only the Congress, but the entire military infrastructure as well. 

The Judge Advocate Generals have known all along that the American people were owed the Law of Peace and they sat there on their velvet tuffets and imposed the Law of War instead.  They did this in the most venal self-interest imaginable.  They did this in gross disrespect of the Public Law, in gross disrespect of their Oaths and Obligations, and in gross disregard of international law as well.

Everyone who has occupied the office of Judge Advocate General since 1959 deserves to be court-martialed. According to the distribution page on PAM 27-161-1 every Legal Services unit in the Active Army, the National Guard, and the Army Reserve received a copy.

As if this was not enough to prove the complicity and the gross betrayal by Congress and the US military of their employers, we have this expose from Forbes Magazine and the University of Michigan:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kotlikoff/2017/12/08/has-our-government-spent

-21-trillion-of-our-money-without-telling-us/#74d800667aef

The amount of money mysteriously missing from these military budgets just happens to be roughly the same amount as the National Credit owed to the American states and people: $21 trillion.  Remember that the way this system is set up, their US National Debt always exactly equals the National Credit owed to the American states and people.   

“So where’s the National Credit?” was the first question out of my mouth many years ago, and now we know. 

Read that— our own military embezzled the National Credit owed to you and your family and sunk it off-shore somewhere for their own benefit.  Who is responsible for this outrage?  Members of Congress and the various Secretaries of Defense beginning with Donald Rumsfeld.

The vermin have borrowed against our assets under false pretenses— our land and our labor— until they could borrow no more. Then they have stolen the credit owed to us, and they are sitting there in Washington, DC, planning their excuses for imposing martial law— which they have been imposing illegally for 150 years anyway.

The American states and people were always their Priority Creditors and they knew it and they stole your credit and lied about the entire circumstance to the American people and the rest of the world. 

These horrific liars and hypocrites have done this all to the tune of Yankee Doodle Dandy and quaint little books about George Washington and the Cherry Tree fed to school children to indoctrinate them into believing their Big Lies— and continuing to go along and serve this monstrosity without question. 

Forget the Russians.  Forget the Muslims.  Forget the Zionists, too. 

The Evil is right here, right in your face, just as Edward Snowden told everyone it was. It’s home-grown, not imported. 

It’s right here in the run-amok federal agencies— the “DOJ” that couldn’t find Justice (or their butts) with both hands, the FBI, the BATF, the CIA, the DIA, the DARPA, the FEMA, the “Homeland Security”, the NSA, the BLM, the IRS, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, the whole lying rotten pack of disgusting predatory vermin who can’t seem to do their jobs or figure out who in the hell they actually work for.  It’s the “departments” of the “government”, too— the “Department of the Treasury” that hasn’t existed as part of our actual government since 1924—all of it so incredibly mucked-up and criminalized that it defies description. 

And let’s not forget the “Federal Reserve”— a bunch of nasty old European interests that never actually had a leg to stand on, a pot to piss in or a place to throw it out— until Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the New Deal Democrats decided to give our country and the value of our labor and our gold and silver reserves to them in exchange for their support of the Democratic Party’s quasi-communist agenda. 

And that isn’t saying that the Republican Party is much better, either, because they have sat on the sidelines and sucked off the cream and wrangled to benefit their own corporate interests with complete disregard for this country and for the people who sent them to Washington, and without any more regard for law or honesty or honor than the filthy Democrats who have sought to enslave everyone on this continent.

Mr. Trump doesn’t just have the job of draining the swamp, he’s being forced to use alligators to do it. 

So now that you all have the facts and the proof, where are your mops and buckets?   Light up those switch boards.  Make those telephones ring.  Hit the “share” button until your finger bleeds.  Sit down and explain it to your wife: we’ve been betrayed from within by unimaginably corrupt and stupid members of the US Congress and even more corrupt members of the US military. 

Make the Bad News go viral— because the first step toward solving a problem is knowing that you have a problem and defining what it is.  And then bringing pressure to bear against those responsible— the Judge Advocate Generals, in particular, the members of Congress in general, the so-called Federal Reserve, the IMF, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the heads of the agencies and commissions, the cabinet members and department heads, all the politicians from here to breakfast. 

Print copies of this article and copies of the Law of Peace pamphlet and copies of the Forbes magazine article and dump millions of copies on the internet worldwide so that the truth can’t be erased by another convenient book burning or computer failure.  Save copies to your hard drives and back them up. Make hard copies for your personal libraries.  Make a hard copy of the pamphlet and take it to court with you, ready to throw down in front of the judge.  Make them run screaming into the bushes, where they belong, cowering under a fence with a porcupine as their only friend.  

Start asking–hey, where is my $21 trillion dollar National Credit?  Why am I being mis-characterized as a “US citizen” when I’m not and don’t want to be?  Who the hell is responsible for falsifying all these public documents?  Why am I being tried in a military tribunal under the Law of War when I am owed the Law of Peace?  What kind of fraud game is going on here?  Who do you people think you are?  How dare you put your filthy mitts in my pocket and think that I am obligated to pay your salaries for this kind of “service”? 

Just say “No”.  Say it loud.  Say it clear.  Let it be heard from sea to shining sea.  And join the chorus. 

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Join With Me and Let’s Change the World

December 10th, 2017 by

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/12/09/join-lets-change-world/

Harvard Researchers Conclude That Margaret Mead Was Right: It Only Takes A Few To Change The World

Paul Craig Roberts

According to the latest fake news from the US government and presstitute media, the US unemployment rate is the lowest in 17 years, but there is no growth in wages. What explains full, or overfull, employment without wage pressure? Obviously, the full employment figure is the orchestrated product of not counting the millions of discouraged workers who, unable to find a job, have ceased looking. If you are unemployed but not looking for a job, you are not counted as unemployed. As it is costly to look for a job, and after awhile looking becomes very depressing, the unemployed just disappear out of the government’s statistics. Will this fake news be something that google censors out of the Internet? Don’t bet your life that google hired 10,000 people to weed off the Internet the fake US employment reports. http://thehill.com/policy/technology/363242-10000-google-staff-set-to-weed-out-extremist-content-on-youtube

Who asked google to transform itself from search engine to gatekeeper? Is there a conspiracy here against the First Amendment? What are google’s qualifications for determining what is fake news and extremist views? Is what are we witnessing here the elite’s use of a private company to control explanations in behalf of the One Percent?

How does a private company get to overrule the First Amendment of the US Constitution? Is this another example of the arrogance embodied in the trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific partnerships that set up corporate tribunals to dictate environmental and other policy to sovereign governments? The elites and globalists are still determined to resurrect these agreements that destroy the sovereignty of peoples.

Why do people use google, youtube, facebook, and twitter when the companies are in a conspiracy against freedom of the press? Is the answer that Americans had rather be entertained than to be free?

Young Americans have already set themselves up for tyranny by using only digital means of payment. Digital money means that government knows every purchase, a person’s holdings, and where their money is. Digital money gives government complete control. Government can freeze, confiscate, turn off your digital money at will, leaving the person totally helpless. Go protest and suddenly you can’t pay your rent, your car payment, your credit card bill. People in such a plight are incapable of resistance. They are far worst off than 19th century slaves, about which there is so much protest.

Are the false war criminal charges brought against former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic an example of the fake news that google is going to suppress? Every Western presstitute, the corrupt Clinton regime, and Washington’s servile European puppet states demonized the innocent Milosevic as a war criminal and sent him off to The Hague to be tried by the War Crimes Tribunal. Milosevic died, or was murdered, in his cell while awaiting the verdict. The Tribunal pronounced him “not guilty,” and now eleven years after his death has again found him not guilty. https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/12/07/hague-tribunal-exonerates-slobodan-milosevic-again.html Are the despicable presstitutes and politicians responsible for ruining Milosevic’s life, and Serbia, examples of the extremist fake news that google is going to censor?

Are Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, and Russian invasion of Ukraine examples of the fake news that google is going to censor?

Don’t bet a nickel on it. Google, youtube, facebook and twitter are going to censor truth so that only the elite’s lies are heard.

Already those who tell the truth are slandered as “conspiracy theorists,” “Russian agents,” and “anti-semites,” and this is prior to google and social media going into action for the One Percent. Ironically, the only way anyone interested in truth will be able to find it is to use Russian and Chinese search engines. They exist already, and if those governments can see the opportunity, the Russian and Chinese search engines will displace google.

Let’s look at google’s censoring of the Internet from a different point of view. Let’s assume that I am being unfair to google and that google is sincere and has in mind some workable definition of “extremism.” What is extreme depends on one’s point of view. For example, what extremism means to a Palestinian is very different from what an Israeli Zionist regards as extremism. How will google monitor 10,000 people censoring the Internet for extremism? An employee affected by the Russiagate hoax will regard any fair statement toward Russia as extremism. A Zionist will regard any criticism of Israel as extremism. Identity Politics will regard any defense of white males or “Civil War” memorials as extremism. You can come up with your own examples. What google is doing is hiring 10,000 people whose personal agendas and biases will determine what “extremism” is.

The US Constitution protects free speech in order to protect truth. If a majority or a minority or “national security” or whatever can censor, in place of truth there will be self-serving agendas and explanations. Truth emerges from open discourse, not from censorship.

Charles Hugh Smith tells us that our rulers intend to control us “with officially generated and sanctioned fake news and ‘approved’ dissent.” In other words, even dissent will be concocted. http://www.blacklistednews.com/The_Demise_of_Dissent%3A_Why_the_Web_Is_Becoming_Homogenized/61698/0/38/38/Y/M.html

paulcraigroberts.org has large readership and dedicated supporters. Nevertheless, many readers think that an individual website can’t have much impact, so why contribute to it. They are wrong. Harvard University researchers in a recent study published in Science conclude that “even small independent news outlets can have a dramatic effect on the content of national conversation.” http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48258.htm

Indeed, this website has a large international impact, in addition to its domestic weight, as many of the columns are reposted on other websites with heavy traffic and translated into other languages and reposted. I am often interviewed on national TV in other countries. There are even Chinese websites that post my columns: http://www.sinopolitico.com

Those of you who make up excuses for not supporting a website that keeps you free open up your pockets and send your donation. The liberal philanthropic foundations support the rule of the elites, and the conservative ones are now in the hands of the neoconservatives. There is no one to support the truth but the people. A tiny percentage of the annual outlay of one of the philanthropic foundations would keep this website alive for years, but it will not arrive.

Throughout the Western World, free thought and free speech are under police state assault. If you do not support those brave enough to speak truth to you, you will only have lies.

Here are a few examples of the influence of this website:

Russian postings: http://svpressa.ru/authors/paul-roberts/

Chinese postings: http://www.sinopolitico.com/category/歐風美語/

German postings: http://www.antikrieg.eu/archiv_paulroberts.htm

https://www.cashkurs.com/autoren/dr-paul-craig-roberts/

http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/GERMAN

Italian postings: http://spondasud.it/?s=ceoldo

https://www.geopolitica.ru/it/article/la-barbarie-di-washington-raggiunge-nuove-vette

https://it.sputniknews.com/punti_di_vista/201708024840401-reaganomics-mito-realta/

https://comedonchisciotte.org/la-presidenza-trump-rip-adesso-rimane-solo-la-rivoluzione/

Croation posings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/Croatian

Serbian postings: http://www.standard.rs/svet/38934-контроверзе-масакра-у-лас-вегасу

French postings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/FRENCH

Polish postings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/POLISH

Greek postings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/GREEK

Portuguese postings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/PORTUGUESE

Romanian postings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/ROMANIAN

Spanish posings: http://paulcraigrobertstranslations.blogspot.pt/search/label/SPANISH

There are many other repostings in foreign translation—Danish, Swedish, the Baltic languages, some former Soviet central Asian languages, Czech, Hungarian, Japanese.

My books are republished abroad in Russian, Chinese, Korean, Czech, Spanish, Turkish, German, French, and Spanish.

Fake news is not google’s real target. Truth-tellers are. A net of disinfomation is being thrown over the entire Western world. Nevertheless, as Margaret Mead said and as the Harvard University study confirms, it only takes a few to change the world.

So, join with me, and let’s change the world. If we don’t, there won’t be a world.

Good Lord Why Do We Put Up With it? + BEST VIDEO OF 2017

December 8th, 2017 by

https://www.federalobserver.com/2017/09/10/good-lord-why-do-we-put-up-with-it/#more-33872

 “Your individual, natural, God-given rights, are only as good as the depth of your willingness and courage to defend them.“ ~ Ron Ewart

The phrase “the Fall of America” suggests some cataclysmic event ended the American Empire which had stretched from Maine to California and Florida to Washington. But at the end, there was no straining at the gates, no barbarian horde that dispatched the Empire in one fell swoop. Rather, the Empire fell slowly, as a result of challenges from within and without, and changing over the course of hundreds of years until its form was unrecognizable.

Last week in our article entitled “The Distorted Window Through Which Americans Perceive Reality” we talked about the great goodness in the American people. The American people ARE good and generous, as donations of food, clothing, money and volunteers to the Hurricane Harvey victims attest. The outpouring of neighbor helping neighbor during this national calamity is inspiring. And yes, local, state and the federal government are stepping up to the plate as well with leadership, equipment and money. Nevertheless, we wonder why Americans cannot see how tyrannical government has become and how many freedoms we have lost since we drifted away from self-reliance, individual responsibility and constitutional liberties.

We allow hordes of illegal aliens to invade our country every day and say we can’t do anything about it because we must be compassionate, without acknowledging the dire consequences that that irrational compassion will inflict upon us. Obama, with his executive orders, has made matters far worse.

We allow our government to slap chains on our wrists and ankles with millions of laws, rules and regulations, without so much as a whimper.

We allow national and international socialism and radical environmentalism to tear down the very foundation of our sovereignty and freedom while we look the other way.

We allow our children to be indoctrinated and brainwashed with the new international, one-world social order and environmental and religious extremism and say we don’t have the time to get involved.

We have allowed special-interest groups to replace the consent of the governed, even though our in-action leads to our own enslavement.

We have allowed a fourth branch of government to grow and metastasize throughout our institutions, a fourth branch that answers to no one, in the rising stench of out-of-control bureaucracies, like the EPA, the BLM, the USFW, the Department of Education and most definitely the IRS.

We allow waste, fraud, abuse, corruption, negligence and incompetence to thrive in our government institutions and don’t demand that the perpetrators be summarily fired, fined, or jailed. We stand back and do nothing while they get promoted and ask for more money to do their job “right”. We allow government unions to blackmail the taxpayer and put roadblocks in the way to fire incompetent people.

We allow government contracts for mega projects and military hardware to escalate into cost overruns that exceed original estimates by several factors. Millions grow to billions and then trillions and not even a ho-hum is uttered.

We have allowed entitlements to grow and grow to the point where one day the piper will have to be paid and government will take our savings, or our very souls to retire the debt. Or some foreign country that holds the debt will confiscate our major assets because we can’t pay. Some say our unfunded liability now stands in excess of $100 Trillion dollars and yet government is offering more of the same that will only make matters worse and increase our debt beyond any capability of ever paying it. We will, for all intent and purposes, go broke, if we stay on the same path.

We shrink in fear and horror when we must send our brave men and women into harms way to protect our national interests. We place a greater value on capitulation and appeasement rather than on strength and victory, in spite of the lessons that history has taught us. However, we will admit that with the Trump presidency, capitulation and appeasement have been significantly diminished.

We allow our government to cut deals with other countries that violate our very sovereignty and economic security and we do nothing. (i.e. NAFTA, CAFTA, Law of the Sea Treaty)

We allow the government to force us to tag every one of our feed stock and domestic animals with a micro chip and notify the government of any movements of those animals, as well as letting them know where we live by GPS coordinates, under the U. S. Agriculture Department’s National Animal Index System (NAIS). How soon will it be before every American is required by government to have a microchip inserted under their skin, or in their earlobe? And both parties will sanction the policy in the name of national security. Some corporations are even floating the idea. How is this any different than the numbers that were tattooed on the arms of Jews in World War II, in the Nazi death camps?

We allow presidents to codify UN social and environmental policies into law by executive order, without ratification by the U. S. Congress, in violation of our Constitution.

We allow our courts to subvert the meaning of the words in our Constitution and fabricate out of thin air, government rights and powers that don’t exist. (i.e. Obama Care) We have become so soft that we have allowed the government to convince us that our security is more necessary than our liberty.

But even worse, we have allowed the entertainment industry to redefine our standards of decency. It has become acceptable to call women, bitches and ho’s. We spit on the rule of law in rap and hip-hop, as well as in film. Swear words, once banned, are now common on TV and radio. The “F” word in movies has become so rampant as to render any story line meaningless.

It is now Ok to demean personal achievement as being, “trying to be better than anyone else.” Or we tax the Hell out of it.

We have allowed common courtesy to go out the window. Because of a negative 24-hour news cycle, our children are exposed daily to the worst within us, instead of the best.

While with science, we have eradicated many diseases that were fatal to us, we have allowed honesty, integrity and honor to be diminished from our culture. We have allowed depravity and bad behavior to define our values, instead of demanding good behavior from each other and those around us. In other words, almost anything goes today and we find it acceptable! In the end, lowering the bar of decency could very well be our undoing as a free society. It has happened before.

This was America, the land of the free, before we decided to become too civil, too compassionate, too cowardly, too weak, too politically correct and too depraved. The result of our folly is to have lost our will to confront the enemies of freedom while we seek earthly pleasures.

Everyone cries out for solutions but that solution will never come until we act as one in the defense of the document that secures our individual rights and freedom, our Constitution, no matter what the price or the consequences. We will not be free so long as we allow the worst in us to define who we are. Our Founding Fathers pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to give birth to this great Nation and our freedom. How on Earth can we dishonor their sacrifice by standing by and letting what they built descend into the sewer of abject socialism?

If you do not believe in your heart that all creatures cry out for freedom, you do not understand nature. If you are not aware that your government is doing everything within its power to strip you of your freedom, your eyes are not open, or you choose not to see. If you do see and do nothing, some may call you a coward. If you do not know that freedom has a price that you must pay, you are naïve and lack wisdom. If you stand by and watch while others take up the “sword” of freedom, your soul shall find no peace and your children and grand children shall bear the scars of your inaction.

The government’s only hold on you is that they assume you will be law-abiding citizens. But what if the laws are too many, contradictory, wrong, or unconstitutional? What then is your duty to obey the law?

Be there not man among you who will rise up against government tyranny that is coming at us from all directions? Let us show the rest of the world that we are still free people and are willing to do whatever it takes to defend that freedom. Let us show the politicians and the bureaucrats that we have a spine and that we are “mad as Hell and we aren’t going to take it any more.” If we do nothing, government will not hear us and do exactly as it pleases. And it is. The question is, “WHY DO WE PUT UP WITH IT?” Yes, Americans are good people but that isn’t enough to preserve liberty.

Has America lost her will to be free? Some of us haven’t, but it would appear that way too many of us have. The question is, will it take a revolution to restore the greatest experiment with freedom that ever existed on planet Earth? Or, will we restore freedom by peaceful means, before revolution becomes the only solution?

If you are a rural landowner, you owe it to yourself to check out NARLO’s powerful, legally intimidating, constitutional NO TRESPASSING SIGNS. Well over 6,000 of these powerful signs have been installed on rural lands all over America.

In spite of the negatives we outline here, we are still a great people and there remains a core of courage and wisdom in us to act. Join with us in this fight for freedom, it being the noblest of all causes. We are individual Americans and we cannot be defeated, unless we decide that security and mindless compassion, at any price, trumps liberty. Let the goodness within us replace the evil that has overtaken us and let that goodness direct us to the great heights that American can still attain, but only under freedom.

We are taking action to preserve freedom for a specific segment of America. For over 11 years we have been helping rural landowners through our organization the “National Association of Rural Landowners” (NARLO). We provide the tools (http://www.narlo.org/sign.html) for rural landowners to fend off attacks by local, state and the federal government and the tens of thousands of rules, regulations, restriction and ordinances landowners must face every day. We offer DISTRIBUTORSHIPS for our powerful No Trespassing signs so the landowner can make a little extra money. We can act as advocates on the individual landowner’s behalf in response to alleged land use or environmental regulation violations. We can even help if the landowner is having trouble with the IRS. In short, we are a one-stop-shop for the American rural landowner. In the spirit of freedom, please consider JOINING our worthwhile and necessary efforts.

© Copyright Sunday, September 10, 2017 – All Rights Reserved

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America“, is the President of the The National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO), a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners. Mr. Ewart can be reached for comment at info@narlo.org.

Mr. Ewart has been a continuing contributor to the Federal Observer since May of 2007.


Olddogs Comments!

What everyone is missing in the Constitution debate is: The existing so-called government is not restrained by the Constitution because they are a Corporation and as such have majority stock holders who are the real power in America. When the majority gets this through their heads then and only then will changes be made and we can return to a UN-incorporated United States.

The real problem American’s have, is the inability to believe the truth.


 THE HAGGMAN REPORT!

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMzASKwtIBw

 http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/fire-them-all-fire-all-deep-state-and.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&

utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net

++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

BEST VIDEO OF 2017

Fire them all – Fire all the Deep State and Shadow Government operatives NOW!

Former CIA manager exposes the whole map of the unlawful operations and structure of the treasonous deep state criminal operations.

 

Kevin shiff

Intelligence Hour

1:48:24

 Ladies and Gentlemen I swear to you in all the years I have been on the net I have never before watched a video this long and I fully intend to watch it again. You will not be bored or disappointed!!!

Olddog

 

If You Ain’t Mad Yet, You’d Better Get Mad

December 7th, 2017 by

from “In Defense of Rural America

By Ron Ewart,

 President of the National Association of Rural Landowners

and nationally recognized author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues

Copyright Sunday, December 3, 2017 – All Rights ReservedIt is difficult to describe how we felt when we learned that Kate Steinle’s killer would only be charged with a “felon in possession of a firearm,” a low level beef at best, considering the severity of the crime he committed in snuffing out Kate’s life on a San Francisco pier, at the dawn of her adulthood.  We suddenly grew red faced with the raw emotions of anger, incredulity and disbelief.  In short, we were mad as Hell!

If a man steals a car and then runs over a person (even accidentally) and kills that person, he will be tried, convicted and sentenced under an involuntary manslaughter charge, plus car theft.  Kate’s killer was a felon in possession of a firearm, which resulted in the death of an innocent bystander.  That by definition is involuntary manslaughter.  There was no question that the bullet came from the gun that the killer fired that killed Kate Steinle, whether accidental or not.  It made no difference that the bullet ricocheted off the concrete.  The killer’s illegal action led to the death of another person.  He should have been punished with many years in prison, if not executed.

But he wasn’t. Shockingly, a San Francisco jury acquitted him.  The jury was not allowed to see his many drug convictions or his five deportations, even though that was material evidence that led to his character and being in the country illegally.  The fact that the killer was given sanctuary in San Francisco under their Sanctuary City policy was also not admitted into evidence.  The fact that he was roaming around free as a bird because of that Sanctuary policy was never exposed to the jury during the trial. 

The jury was composed of six men and six women.  Three of those jurors were immigrants.  It is not known whether the immigrants were legal or illegal but that contingent of immigrants may very well have played a role in a “not guilty” verdict.  The killer pulled the trigger but the sanctuary city mindset was tattooed on the bullet.

 The trial was a sham and an egregious miscarriage of justice.  As it stands right now, no one has atoned for Kate Steinle’s death.

Fortunately, a federal arrest warrant has been issued for the killer on other federal charges, so it is likely he will do a few more years in prison ….. before they deport him.  But if the FEDS deport him, he will just come back across the border and head straight for a sanctuary city, like San Francisco.

A porous southern border, lax illegal immigration enforcement and Sanctuary City policies killed Kate Steinle.  The hue and cry against this injustice should be heard loud and long across the land.  If people are as angry as we are, there are two specific actions they can take so that Kate Steinle’s death will not be in vain. 

1 Americans must unite around a no-tolerance illegal alien policy. All illegal aliens should be deported, even if it costs billions of dollars.  That would send a message that coming to America can only be accomplished by legal means.  Make them all go through the front door.  Any other policy spits on the rule of law and insults lawful Americans by making them pay to support law breaking illegal aliens and suffer the indignities, lost jobs and lower wages due to a rampant illegal alien invasion.

2 Americans and businesses must unite around a boycott of San Francisco and the State of California to punish them for their sanctuary policies. Quit visiting the city by the bay and take your vacation and business dollars elsewhere. 

 NOTE:  We have prepared a sample letter to the Mayor of San Francisco and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, telling them Americans and businesses are going to boycott their city because of the city’s Sanctuary City Policy.  To see the sample letter and San Francisco and Governor Jerry Brown’s contact information, including telephone and fax numbers and individual e-mail addresses, click HEREOverload their phones and e-mail addresses with your anger and disgust.  Phone ’em.  Fax ’em.  E-mail ’em, or call ’em.  If the federal government can’t control sanctuary cities, maybe the people can.  The city of San Francisco needs to pay for the death of Kate Steinle!

Who said Americans won’t do the jobs performed by illegal aliens?  Many of those in our age group (60’s, 70’s and 80’s) cut their teeth on picking berries, apples, pears and peaches in their teenage years.  Some of us picked cotton.  Our first job was picking Logan berries at the age of 12.  We were excited about earning a little extra money so that we didn’t have to beg our parents for an allowance.

Good Lord, when are Americans going to get mad enough to do something to right the injustices that happen to us every day.  Illegal immigration is a festering sore on our bodies, our emotions, our laws, our financial wellbeing and our economy.  If this sore goes untreated, it will kill us and it will eventually kill American freedom and sovereignty, if it hasn’t already.

Here are some other actions Americans could take, or lobby government to change the laws.

1 Close and protect our borders from infiltration by illegal aliens, drugs and terrorists, by whatever means, including physical force.  If there were severe penalties for crossing our borders, there would be less of it.

2)        Build the wall ….. NOW!

3)        Enforce current law already on the books.

4)        Track all foreigners who over stay their visas and deport them.

5)        Immediately deport all illegal aliens that are caught without documentation.  There should be no hearings or other administrative procedures.  Illegal aliens should not be entitled to due process because illegal aliens should have no rights.  They should not be entitled to driver’s licenses or other government services.

6)        Severely punish employers who hire illegal aliens and make them responsible for proving citizenship of their employees.  As an employer we took validating citizenship very seriously.  If there was any question, we investigated.  Fine the employer $10,000 for every alien they illegally employ.

7)        As some states are doing now, stop all social benefits, education, bilingual services, emergency services and social services to any individual or family that is not a legal citizen of the United States unless here on a valid visa or green card.

8)        Loosen the child labor law regulations so that teenagers can learn about work, salaries and responsibilities by working on the farms and picking America’s crops.

9)        Pass Kate’s Law giving mandatory 5 year sentences to illegal aliens that come back across the border after being deported.

In a previous article on illegal immigration we wrote:

As reported by the Texas Department of Public Safety:  “According to DHS status indicators, over 217,000 criminal aliens have been booked into local Texas jails between June 1, 2011 and March 31, 2017. During their criminal careers, these criminal aliens were charged with more than 579,000 criminal offenses. Those arrests include 1,179 homicide charges; 68,900 assault charges; 16,854 burglary charges; 68,999 drug charges; 699 kidnapping charges; 40,818 theft charges; 45,104 obstructing police charges; 3,813 robbery charges; 6,190 sexual assault charges; and 8,693 weapons charges. Of the total criminal aliens arrested in that timeframe, over 144,000 or 66% were identified by DHS status as being in the US illegally at the time of their last arrest.”

 “According to DPS criminal history records, those criminal charges have thus far resulted in over 260,000 convictions including 485 homicide convictions; 25,882 assault convictions; 8,239 burglary convictions; 34,077 drug convictions; 238 kidnapping convictions; 18,543 theft convictions; 22,179 obstructing police convictions; 1,939 robbery convictions; 2,812 sexual assault convictions; and 3,625 weapons convictions. Of the convictions associated with criminal alien arrests, over 173,000 or 66% are associated with aliens who were identified by DHS status as being in the US illegally at the time of their last arrest.”

In each one of these crimes in Texas there is a Texas victim or victims that you never hear about, whose lives have been altered forever by the criminal actions of an illegal alien.  There may even be a Kate Steinle in there somewhere.  Many of the convicted criminal illegal aliens are now in our jails and the American taxpayer gets to pay for their incarceration as well.  And this is just one state.  Are you beginning to get the picture?  Are you angry yet?  If not, why not?

* * * * * * * * * * *

Ladies and gentlemen, Americans cannot and should not look the other way when a national injustice is staring them in the face.   How bad does it have to get before people of courage and conviction rise up and right that injustice?  Sadly, most of the suggestions we have made in this article will never be implemented because the Congress is impotent and the people are lazy or plain don’t care.

However, our readers and other Americans have a chance to make a difference today.  Check out our “Boycott San Francisco” web page.  Copy and paste our sample letter into your word processor and mail it, or e-mail it to the San Francisco Mayor and the Board of Supervisors.  Or call or fax them.  We have also provided their phone and fax numbers on the web page.  If you don’t like our wording, change it.  We’ve done the hard work and made it easy for you.  Make San Francisco pay for Kate Steinle’s death by letting them know you are going to boycott them.  The killer didn’t pay, but justice demands that someone must pay.  Make that someone the City of San Francisco.

 If this doesn’t go viral, it will be a token effort.  Token efforts always fail.

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues and author of this weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America“.  Ron is the president of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO) (www.narlo.org), a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, acting as an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners.  Affiliated NARLO websites are “SAVE THE USA” (http://www.stusa.us/) and “Getting Even With Government” (http://www.gewgov.com/).   Ron can be reached for comment HERE.

WANTED! 100 MILLION REAL AMERICANS

December 6th, 2017 by

http://wp.me/p17zol-3QFBy OldDog

This is no joke folks! America as you think of it was born dead and only by educating a sizeable portion of the people can we give it life. As it is now, it is just about dead forever and some of us have awakened to that fact. We need every red blooded lover of freedom to get educated and do it as fast as possible. Then we need to form an army of patriots to go forth and demand everyone they know to get educated with us. This is no joke!

While we were sleeping and distracted with the good life our so called politicians have been stealing us blind and making it impossible to continue enjoying the life-style we were promised; one of prosperity and happiness.

Have you not noticed the haughty attitude of your representatives as they go about destroying our country? Do you still not know that a lawyer is your enemy and works for the court? Do you not know it will be impossible to choose your own doctor in the near future, and your children are NOT yours to protect?

If it was not for your infatuation with family duties, entertainment and leisure time you would probably have noticed that you are in fact a slave to the powers that really run our country. They literally claim to own us, and that fact is irrefutable. Now I know many of you consider yourselves loyal Americans due to what you have been taught all your life, but common sense should tell you that something is drastically wrong, and it is, but you must do the home work to discover the reasons and methods they used to do it.

Fortunately there are people who have done the research and found out all the details of this unspeakable theft of our lives, property and prosperity, so all you have to do is get off your back side and get educated by reading their material.

Let me refer you to Anna Von Reitz and her web-site with almost eight hundred short articles that anyone with half a brain can understand.

http://www.annavonreitz.com/ Read everything on this site!

This is a grandmother who also has a husband that is our legal Head of State and Postmaster which most of you may not know is a legal part of our original political system. They are rebuilding our original form of government and need our help, which is getting educated and helping others to do the same.

I know how crazy this must sound to most of you, just as it did to me some years back, but take it to the bank folks it is either get educated our lose all of your family, possessions, freedom, wealth, and health. If you cannot see the need to know the facts surrounding Americas fall, then you of all people need to study and learn the truth about America. It will soon be gone forever without as sizeable population of informed people. You won’t know what hit you when the crap hits the fan.

“You Know Something Is Wrong When… An American Affidavit of Probable Cause” is the blockbuster you need to read. This book blows the lid off the corrupt corporate entity calling itself our Federal government, and shows the entire history of Fraud, Deception, Threat, Duress, Coercion, and Intimidation the perpeTRAITORS have used to steal our entire heritage and prosperity for over 150 years: Get it Here at Amazon

 

177.Very important solution oriented article you need to read.
Solid Resources and Brief Explanations from Anna Von Reitz

299.Fundamental American Government Structure
What most people completely miss about American Government313.Estate Claim Filed with the Pope

Estate Claim Filed with the Pope

Step By Step – – Part Two – -The Gas

December 5th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/step-by-step-part-two-gas.html?utm_

source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&

utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%

3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

By Anna Von Reitz

So you now know what the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is and how it functions and why you authenticate it.

What else do you need to reclaim your identity and your Holder-In-Due Course/Subrogee/Priority Creditor status?

You have to correct the omission your parents made and record your Common Law copyright to your own name. 

The Session Laws of every State — federated or not — contain language guaranteeing your right to establish a Common Law copyright to your Assumed Name. 

Please note:  I said “Session Laws”—- not “statutes”. 

Also note that the correct description of your Upper and Lower case name, First Middle Last, as in: Michael John Doe, is properly known as a “Trade Name” or a “Given Name” and this style of name is known as a “bicameral” name. 

It is “assumed” in the sense that when you came into this world you didn’t have a name and were given one, but there are other kinds of assumed names including pen names and noms de guerre and corporate names, too. 

The Session Laws include all these kinds of names under the blanket description “assumed names”. 

The name your parents gave you, your given Trade Name, has to be reclaimed and copyrighted and permanently domiciled on the land and soil of the state where you were born, together with all styles, orders, forms, punctuation, variations, abbreviations and other derivatives of your basic Trade Name. 

This is done by recording your claim and Certificate of Assumed Name in a land recording office or a postal district court or both.  Please note that a “recording” is different from a “registration”. 

You record a deed because it references a land asset. People and their names are naturally land assets, too: for dust Thou art and to dust returneth– and so of course are other actual, factual things such as rocks and trees and farm fields and houses and houses and dogs and cats— all land assets. 

Now, I have shared examples of CERTIFICATES OF ASSUMED NAMES on my website that people can observe and use as templates to create their own documents simply by replacing the names, dates, addresses, etc. with their own.

These examples cite the Session Laws of Alaska and Washington State simply because that is where they happened to be brought.  Other states have their own Session Laws regarding ASSUMED NAMES which guarantee your Common Law copyright, so if you live in Minnesota or Florida or some other State, by all means consider spending an afternoon at a law library or hiring a paralegal to dig through and find the “local” Session Law and cite that in addition to the Alaska and Washington State laws. 

That said, the Doctrine of Equal Protection mandates that a protection provided in one state must be provided in all states of the Union, and if you absolutely cannot find the right Session Law for your state, you may rely on the citations provided from Washington and Alaska.

Some land recording offices object and refuse to file any record that doesn’t include the Session Law reference for their State; this is either ignorance or guile on the parts of the Clerks who don’t know the difference between Session Laws and Statutes— but no matter.

You are not dependent on the Land Recording Offices to record your claims.

It’s nice if you can get it on the Public Record that way, but not critical. 

You can use the Post Office to create a record of your claim by sending yourself a Registered Letter containing a wet-ink original copy of the CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME.  This is called a “Record Copy”. When you receive the Registered Letter that you sent to yourself, you don’t open it. You tuck it away in a file folder along with your own file copy of the CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME.

If there is ever a question or you are forced to go to court, you certify a black and white copy of the CERTIFICATE from your file as “true, correct, and complete” and sign off on this as the “Document Custodian”.  Then take your unopened Registered Letter to court as proof. Wave it at the Judge.  If the judge has temerity enough to open your letter (which he won’t) he has to certify the Record Copy on the record of the court upon your request and that seals the doom of any claim against your claim.

You can further back up your claim by placing a briefly stated Public Notice in the local newspaper(s).  Just a couple sentences will do, for example, “The Trade Name “William Henry Doe” has been returned and re-conveyed to its natural permanent domicile on the land and soil of New Hampshire effective March 2nd 1950; Doe, Wm. Henry, Fiduciary, in care of 4109 Fairfield Street, Oxford Massachusetts, 01540.”

Wave the newspaper clippings showing the dates of publication at the judge, too. 

Please note that the examples of the CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME that are provided on my website include a permanent standing claim of the writ of Habeas Corpus, which allows you to come in and commandeer their courts if they address you improperly. 

With your Authenticated Birth Certificate and your recorded CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME firmly in hand, you are now ready to mow the grass. 

Or maybe I should liken it to saying the magic words:

“I claim the writ of Habeas Corpus allowing me to operate in this court while maintaining my true position and domicile on the land of these United States. I am the living Subrogee and Priority Creditor of the DEFENDANT. I claim all exemptions and bonds related to this case contract number and as an innocent Third Party controlling interest move the court to dismiss these allegations for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”

This is a fancy way of saying that any money owed by the DEFENDANT is owed to you, not them, and that they don’t have the jurisdiction to make any claims favoring themselves or to say jack-diddly-squat otherwise. 

This works in all cases regardless of what the case may be, so long as you have not murdered anyone (in which case the Prosecutor stands for the injured party) or actually injured a living man or woman or their property. 

This works on all cases brought against YOU including foreclosure cases, child custody cases, statutory crimes, traffic tickets, tax cases— anything bogus that does not actually involve a living Injured Party who is willing to stand up in court and accuse you of actual injury to them or their private property— and so long as you are not in fact a federal citizen.  

So there at last is your Administrative Process which frees you from the dread of these liars and flim-flam artists.  In fact, unless you are actually a federal citizen, I recommend that you just stay home and send the Judge and the Court Clerk a nice, polite Registered Letter in lieu of appearing physically at all. 

Just take black and white photocopies of your Authenticated BC, your CERTIFICATE OF ASSUMED NAME, the mailing receipts, mark everything “private and confidential”, certify it all as “true, complete, and correct” as the Document Holder, and explain that you don’t exist in their jurisdiction and don’t acquiesce to their jurisdiction and object to having their court mis-address you. Note that you are the Holder in Due Course of your Trade Name and Estate and all Derivatives thereof—and request that they drop all charges and return the balance of any court bonds to you, the Subrogee and Priority Creditor of the DEFENDANT at the address shown above, sincerely……

So long as you provide a polite answer nobody can accuse you of being in contempt of court, and so long as you reply to a summons in proper character there is no basis for issuing a warrant. 

And if by any chance they ignore the facts and continue their prosecution, start thumping on the military authorities, especially the US Army, which is supposed to be riding herd on the Bar.  Instead, they have been letting the Bar ride herd on them.  They have entrusted this function to Provost Marshals who are all members of the Bar, so they have the foxes guarding the other foxes and the hen house at the same time— a situation that has to stop. 

Start banging your dishes on the floor like angry dogs and demand that the Army get up off its complacent rump, read Title IV, then read Title XXXVII and realize the crimes that these disguised “Uniformed Officers” — conscripted doctors– are being forced to commit in hospitals throughout America and then finally read their own Field Manuals.  It’s all there in black and white. 

We, the American states and people, are being subjected to vicious crimes— press-ganging, identity theft, kidnapping, inland piracy, unlawful conversion, forced enslavement and conscription, mis-characterization of our nationality and political status, virulent fraud and racketeering, genocide on paper— at the hands of people on our payroll, by attorneys operating outside their jurisdiction, and by banks operating as crime syndicates on our shores— and the US Army and the Coast Guard which are both specifically tasked to protect us from all this are part of the problem.

They have let the “Rat Problem” get totally out of control and have failed to protect us and our actual borders. 

So, given this overall deplorable circumstance, please tell me what we are paying billions upon billions of dollars in “national security” expenses for?  It’s like paying for a fur coat and being given a Do-It-Yourself paper raincoat instead.

But I digress…. you now know exactly what has been done and how you need to reply to it, and if the Bar members do anything but the right thing, you now know who to complain to. 

Time to mow the lawn, America, and do a damn good job.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Step By Step – – What You Have All Been Screaming For – – Part One

December 4th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/step-by-step-what-youve-all-been.html

By Anna Von Reitz

There have been so many piteous outcries coming in from people who are totally confused or partially befuddled that I have once again faced the necessity of sitting down at my computer and…..

Step 1: Sit down and look at your “Birth Certificate” and understand what it is and how it functions.

It has two basic functions.  First, it is an Insurance Indemnity Receipt which is required under the Lieber Code/Hague Conventions.  They have to give you an indemnity receipt for the property they are stealing from you— essentially an insurance policy guaranteeing that your property won’t be harmed as a result of their use of it.

This makes you the “Subrogee” — the Insured Party and Priority Creditor of your own ESTATE holdings.  This process of “registration” (as opposed to “recording”) creates a separate PERSON named after your Given Trade Name, yet owned and operated by a franchise of the MUNICIPAL UNITED STATES— the separate government of Washington, DC, operated as an international city-state by the members of Congress.

When you get your BC “Authenticated” by the United States of America State Department you find out for sure which federal corporation is issuing the BIRTH CERTIFICATE you have been issued.  In most cases it will be a STATE OF STATE, like THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, but in some cases will be a federal department, such as THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

Second, the Birth Certificate is a Bond—literally.  It is a bond issued against the value of the ESTATE (or more recently, Public Transmitting Utility) assets that belong to you.  A bond is an I.O.U. — a promise to pay under stipulated conditions.  You have the certificate proving that you are the actual owner of the assets being bonded, but until and unless you claim your exemption from their system of things, the benefit of the bond goes to the STATE OF STATE or DEPARTMENT that is insuring your purloined property against loss or damage.

Now notice a couple other things about your Birth Certificate that prove that what I am telling you is true.

There are two prominent dates displayed on the certificate.  One is your actual birth day.  The other is the “File Date” when the PERSON (a corporate municipal franchise) was created and replaced you as the beneficiary of your own assets.  So you, the living man or woman, have a birth day— and the corporate franchise “PERSON” named after you has a birth date which is always a few days or weeks after your birth day.  In effect, the BIRTH CERTIFICATE records the “death” of your claim to own your own estate and Trade Name, and the “birth” of the federal PERSON’s claim upon your assets.  You are always the Holder-in-Due-Course, the Party having the first claim (first in line, first in time) to the Trade Name and Estate, but if you don’t claim it, or know how to claim it, you are out of luck and disinherited.

The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is signed by the Registrar — an Officer of the Probate Court, which proves that your estate was probated.  The living American state national, for example, the Minnesotan named William Bales Jensen, was taken off the title of his natural estate and his natural nationality and political status was changed to that of “WILLIAM BALES JENSEN” —a federal Municipal franchise corporation and “citizen of the United States”—- that is, a citizen under the Diversity Clause of the old Federal Code which allows corporations to be citizens..

The BIRTH CERTIFICATE is issued on bond paper, giving you “silent Notice” that the assets named on the face of the document — your unlawfully converted estate assets including the copyright to your Trade Name, your land, your labor, everything that you could ever own— has been seized upon and bonded by the organization issuing the certificate.

The process of false probate just described results in the unlawful conversion of your name and estate assets, makes you a “US citizen” instead of an “American state national”, removes you from the jurisdiction of the land and deprives you of your constitutional protections, makes you indebted and obligated to pay the bills of foreign corporations, and otherwise plays havoc with you and your entire country.

This is done without your knowledge or consent, without your parent’s knowledge or consent, and the people doing this to you are on your payroll, supposed to be rendering you Good Faith service the whole while.  Because you don’t know that this is being done to you and that these false claims against you are being made, you have no opportunity to object to them, much less delve through it to rebut all these lies and claim your exemption and exercise your indemnity.Now a few further notes:

For many years the vermin seized upon your Given Christian Trade Name, just as you were taught to print it in First Grade with a first name, middle name, and last name all written in Upper and Lower Case like this: John Michael Doe.

Their federal franchise was structured as a Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trust operated under the same name written in all capital letters:  JOHN MICHAEL DOE.

Most recently, the vermin have tried to change their stripes and instead of creating their fictional PERSONS as Cestui Que Vie ESTATE trusts, they have been creating Public Transmitting Utility franchises named after you.  How can you tell the difference?

The ESTATE trusts are all named with the full first, middle, and last names appearing in all capital letters: JOHN MICHAEL DOE.  The PUBLIC TRANSMITTING UTILITIES all appear with only a Middle Initial, but still in all capital letters: JOHN M. DOE.

Please note that any name in any style that uses only a Middle Initial is not a legal name.  It is meaningless and void for lack of specificity.  Was that John Michael Doe or John Mark Doe or John Marvin Doe or John Maxwell Doe or…..or….or….

You can always call the vermin on that, because lack of specificity destroys the existence of any jurisdiction actual or fictional.  A claim against such a named entity can only stand if you just assume it is your name and accept the charges without objection.

This technicality is not the essence of the problem nor your strongest defense.  This is just to point out that what they are doing is blatantly, obviously, on-the-face-of-it-illegal, and you don’t need any rocket science to prove that it is, nor any other cause to object. If you raise this objection and they proceed against you, they are dead meat upon appeal — a fact that may not be known to you, but which is written in stone above their heads: if you don’t properly identify the parties, you have no claim.

Now that you know what the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is and what its functions are, it will make more sense to you that you need to get it verified as a genuine document —and this is where the process of authentication comes in.

Why “authentication” and why not an “apostile” nor a “certification”?

Countries that are signers on the Hague Conventions use apostiles to verify genuine documents passing between themselves.  Countries that are not part of the Hague Conventions use authentication for the same purpose.  Certification is an “in-house” domestic equivalent of a guarantee and isn’t strong enough for international use.

The United States of America never signed the Hague Conventions.  The United States did.

As a result, documents issued by or pertaining to The United States of America and its international functions have to be “authenticated” while documents issued by or pertaining to the United States have to “apostiled”.  Both processes serve the same purpose of verifying the record and the paper.

When you act as an American state national you are acting under the auspices of The United States of America, so when you are ready to reclaim your assets and exercise your exemptions, you use documents that are authenticated.

If you were an actual federal employee or dependent and acting under the auspices of the United States, Inc. as a franchise of the Municipal government or as a citizen of the Territorial government (either one) you would use documents that are apostiled.

All that is the reason why you go through the turkey trot of getting your records officially verified and why you need to do this correctly.

I recommend getting at least two if not three copies of your Birth Certificate ordered from the Vital Statistics people.  Keep one and send two to the State Secretary of State and ask for an “authentication” to do business in Indonesia— a non-Hague Convention country.  They will add a cover sheet, signature, and seal guaranteeing that the attached BC is genuine.

Next, take the state-authenticated documents and send them to the United States of America Secretary of State’s Office in DC and request the same service — authentication of the BC for use in Indonesia.

Each authentication requires a small fee.  At the end of the day, you get back a three page document — the original BC you got from Vital Statistics, the State Secretary of State’s cover page, and on top of that, a yellow, heavy-weight cover page from the USA Secretary of State’s Office.

That yellow page verifies the authenticity of the State Secretary of State’s guarantee and it tells you explicitly which federal entity–STATE OF STATE franchise or DEPARTMENT— issued the indemnity receipt and is responsible for guaranteeing your exemption from all this rot.

Now, finally, you have the proof in your hand of what has been done to you, who did it, and who is liable for it.  You have the lawn mower, and now all you need is the gas.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Big News for the World

December 2nd, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/12/big-news-for-world.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Big News for the World

[The irony is that the world banking community knows the news already; the only shock is that we know the news and have chosen to come forward and share it with everyone else.]

The American states and people own the debt of virtually every government at every level in the entire world–and we are aware of that fact and we are telling the world: hey, stop dealing with middlemen who are claiming to represent us.

No deal they can make “for” us is valid.

In commercial terms, the banks, lawyers, and politicians are not authorized to represent us in the settlement of any alleged bankruptcy, debt, credit, or other matter affecting our role and responsibility as the Paramount Security Interest Holders.

Instead of talking to bankers or politicians — talk to the actual Postmasters who hold the bank charters and who are fiduciaries of the Creditors. Okay?

This is not rocket science.

For everyone’s information, the actual government of this country is an unincorporated Body Politic. Our name is: The United States of America. We operate in sovereign (that is, unincorporated) capacity. We do business as people using simple Trade Names and as persons in charge of unincorporated businesses engaged in peaceful international trade. We are the Paramount Security Interest Holders and Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES, INC. and all franchises thereof.

Ditto the USA, Inc. and all successors, derivatives, franchises, holdings, and variations thereof.

Our Post Master and Hereditary Head of State is James Clinton Belcher. Our Post Office and Seat of Government is located at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Great Seal of the United States of America and the lesser (delegated) Great Seal of the United States belong to us as sovereign property.

We exercise all international land jurisdiction and retain all non-delegated powers in the international jurisdiction of the sea which naturally belong to the Union of the States of America as an unincorporated Holding Company created by those same states. Our official language is American English. Our official law is American Common Law. Our law is Public Law exercised for private purposes. Our money is the United States Silver Dollar, aka, American Silver Dollar.

We hold the charter on all private banks, all state credit unions, and all international trade banks. 

We also ultimately subrogate and hold the charters of all federal commercial banks and credit unions under delegation. We have several accounts at the U.S. Treasury and we basically own the assets of the U.S. Treasury under delegation. 

We have established cured claims upon all assets of the various federal corporations and federated “states of states” and we have posted our Private Indemnity Bonds. The name of our National Banking Association is The American States and Nations Bank. We are open for business through all our state credit union facilities nationwide.

Please note that state credit unions are specifically in business to serve “natural persons” known as “people” and unincorporated businesses, and also note that all state (not federal) credit unions are lawful money institutions already and are enabled to accept precious metals deposits and asset-backed currencies.

Anyone having any questions is welcome to contact me for additional details, but it really is as easy as looking up “state credit unions” in the phone book, or, if a state credit union is not available in your area, get together with your neighbors and form one.

The government of the United States by contrast is Territorial in nature. The United States Postmaster General is RUSSELL-J:GOULD. In its delegated capacity, the Territorial United States also has its seat of government located at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In its municipal capacity, the Territorial United States also holds a seat of government in Washington, DC.

The United States holds the delegated authority over commercial affairs. As a result, it holds the charters of all the commercial banks and federal credit unions. These institutions all deal with “persons”—incorporated entities and their franchises —not actual living people.

The fiat currency — the Federal Reserve Notes, for example, are all issued by the United States in the name of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA which is a corporation created by the US NAVY –a municipal corporation and now, a UN Corporation, that has nothing to do with the unincorporated government of The United States of America. 

It is merely infringing on our international common law copyright of our business name and trademarks which have been in effect and in constant use since September 9, 1776—a situation which is now under correction.

So it is now a matter of public record placed before at least 50 million people worldwide exactly who the Postmasters for The United States of America and The United States are and who exercises the rights and responsibilities.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Anna in Wonderland

December 1st, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/anna-in-wonderland.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Forget about sweet little Alice.  This is Grandma Anna reporting from Wonderland.

This morning I was awakened at 4 a.m. with a feeling of uneasiness.  Why?  Because the polarity we have lived with and in for so long is shifting, and yet, the old paradigm persists with great stubbornness and will not yield to any gentle remedy.

I have given the world a gentle remedy, one that would not hurt anyone— a simple bookkeeping adjustment that would bring everything back into balance, create a credit-based world economy, and provide for everything anyone on Earth needs to thrive and be happy.

The only thing standing in the way are illusions of greed and power related to things that don’t exist.  Delusions, in other words.  Falsehoods.  Lies.  But even the liars are deceived.

In a way, among all the strange things I have observed, that is the strangest of all.  You would think that the liars could keep track of their own lies and therefore know the truth, but in fact, they are just as confused as everyone else. Maybe more so.

Among the infinite number of truisms and adages my Mother faithfully drilled into me is this one: “It’s hard to cheat an honest man.”  — and recent events force me to revisit that little proverb from a new perspective.

It’s hard to cheat an honest man because he flat-out isn’t interested in any schemes of unjust enrichment, so his own virtue is his safeguard against being embroiled in any scams.

I have known and benefited from that fact first-hand, so that is no mystery to me, but I never paused before to take in the inverse of that little adage: it is easy to cheat a dishonest man—because they aren’t thinking straight in the first place.

And that is what has happened here and throughout the world.  A vast number of dishonest men have fallen victim to their own lies and delusions and willingness to cheat and oppress others.

They’ve come to believe their own bull-crap, so they are utterly undone and confused when—guess what?  Their lies turn out to be lies—and nobody could be more disappointed about it than they are?

What I am seeing this morning rather defies and beggars description.

Washington, DC, as a whole, is waking up to the fact that quadrillions of dollars have been embezzled out of our country by politicians and military officers and so-called “intelligence agencies”.

This is no news to me.  Is it news to you?  Should it be news to anyone in Washington, DC?  Anyone in Peking?  Anyone in Brussels?  After all, these other countries have been on the receiving end of the pipeline.

They have been benefiting from all this fraud and the plunder being sent home to London and Rome and then dispersed to all the collaborators as part of the Hague Conventions.

I don’t think anyone but the slumbering, trusting American people have any right to be surprised, and yet, the “Ant Hill” is swarming and the media black-out is like pitch and the diplomatic couriers are leaving smoking footprints in the snow from here to Belgravia this morning.

In the midst of this madness, let me suggest an immediate Executive Order ending all mortgage foreclosures in this country?  That would be a logical response to the “discovery” of massive, automated, patented fraud that has been fully admitted on the public record by the perpetrators themselves—would it not?

What’s the point in throwing another six million American families out into the snow just before Christmas, when you know for a fact that the claims against them are all fraudulent?

What’s the point of protecting guilty banks and bankers and lawyers and public officials who have participated in the pillaging of fraudulently created public trusts?

In the immortal words of Jay Rivera, “It is what it is.”

Putting lipstick on the pig, pretending that it is in fact a chinchilla, doesn’t change anything.

Stealing from your employers, attacking your own people— that’s just crazy, criminal nonsense.

President Trump—start with a mortgage foreclosure moratorium. Failing to do so only increases the liability of everyone responsible, both commercially and morally.

Step two — call off the Bar Association attack dogs and shut down the District Courts for any activity other than the administration of actual federal business involving actual federal employees and actual federal dependents. Go after actual “federal citizens” all you like, but leave peace-loving Americans who have been conscripted under fraud, force, and duress alone.

Step three — return the Magistrate level courts to their proper venue and return the bulk of law enforcement officials to active duty as peacekeeping officers tasked with upholding the Public Law.

And all the bankers worldwide?  Reconsider my January 6 Mandate.  There are worse things than being forced to do business in an honest way and giving back a portion of profits for good works as a B Corporation.

 

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Are You a Hue-Man? The Entrapment Game on a Global Scale.

November 30th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/are-you-hue-man-entrapment-game-on.html

 

By Anna Von Reitz

For the last year or so I keep knocking into bright-eyed, bushy-tailed idealists preaching about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights promoted by the United Nations.

A “hue-man” by legal definition is not a man (or woman).  It is a “color of Man”— something that appears to be a man, but not isn’t actually, similar to “color of law”– a statute or other representation that appears to be a law, but isn’t.

Another definition of “human” is “monster”—- a thing, and again, not a man or woman.

So, are you a “human”?  No.

Should “humans” have rights?  Arguably not, if they exist.  Why would you give rights to something that only appears to be a man, but which is in fact, a monster— an animal or a thing only appearing to be a man?

Universal Declaration of Sasquatch Rights?

What does that have to do with the price of beans in China?

Let me tell you—- it’s all about what lawyers call “admissions”, and it is the same filthy game that you have already seen before, when they used similar names deceits to get your Mother to agree that you were a “US Citizen”.  She admitted it, so it must be true, right?  Even if she was deceived, even if she was coerced, there is a record of accusation called an “information” signed by your own Mother standing against your good name that admitting you are a “US Citizen”.

Oh, and also an unwanted bastard child born out of wedlock and cast upon the mercy of the State of Whatever corporation as a ward of the state.

In fact— unless you are a federal employee or dependent or political asylum seeker, there is no way that you are now nor ever were a “US Citizen”, nor have you ever been a “citizen of the United States”—- but by getting your Mother (and you) to ignorantly sign paperwork agreeing that you are such a “citizen” the vermin have an excuse for treating you as one.

And that’s the whole point of the exercise— to test you and see if you know who and what you are.  If you don’t, you are prey.

This is how they gain the evidence needed to “presume” against you in court.  This is how they allege that you are liable to pay federal income taxes, that you are obligated to follow all 80 million federal codes and statutes, that you are responsible for paying their public debts, that you are subject to their government, that you are “eligible” (and required) to pay into Social Security (which is their private pension plan) and so on.

If you admit to being a “US Citizen”, you are one until you go through a very arduous learning and reclamation process to prove that you aren’t in fact a “US Citizen” and don’t desire any such foreign political status.

So that’s the Entrapment Game— get you to ignorantly admit being something you aren’t and then take full advantage of the admission.

It’s the same thing with admitting to being a “human”.

If you are not a man, they are justified in treating you as something subhuman, something that merely appears to be a man.  And the whole diatribe about “human rights” is just sop, a means of allegedly providing you with “benefits” that you are already owed anyway, that cost them nothing, in exchange for your admission that you aren’t really a man or woman— and are therefore inferior and subject to them.

Another common gambit is to call you “Mister” or “Miss” or “Missus” or some other “title”—- titles are a British means to subject people to the rule of their government.  In fact, a “Mister” is either a Midshipman in the British Navy, or a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marines, which is, interestingly enough also the definition of a “Withholding Agent”.

I once witnessed an absolutely brilliant defense against tax charges.  It was clear that the man had won his case.  As he was walking out the Judge called him, “Mr. Smith” (not really his name, but you get the point) and he didn’t immediately object and he didn’t just keep on walking.  The victim turned around and answered politely —-and zap!  Right back into the net, right back into the presumption that he was in fact a “Mister”— a renegade Withholding Agent who failed to do his duty and didn’t give the Queen and the Pope their cut.

The judge then proceeded to ream him and sentence him on the spot to 3 years in jail and a huge fine—and the poor man had no idea what happened or why.

Now you know and I know that he admitted to being a “Mister” which then gave the judge the needed prima facie evidence to convict him of tax fraud.

It’s the same thing with the word “resident”.  US Citizens— real ones— can’t own land in the states, because they are foreigners merely “residing” here on a temporary basis while they conduct their business of providing “essential government services”.

If you admit to being a “resident” either by calling yourself one or by allowing one of them to apply that description to you, your claim to own your own property (as in a foreclosure case where this is a common ploy) flies right out the window.  Such verbal tricks are the stock and trade of these fraud artists and you must learn to be wary and recognize them and rebut them whenever and wherever they rear their ugly heads.

Any time anyone applies any kind of descriptive label to you— balk. Object. Even if you are not sure that there is any agenda afoot, object and “demur” anyway. Give yourself the chance to look up the legal meanings of the words or force your opponent to define the meaning of the word for you.

Anyway, a big thumbs down on “human rights” and a big thumbs up for the natural and unalienable rights of all natural men and woman worldwide.

Next time someone starts blathering to you about human rights— you know what to do.

Look that glazed-over, starry-eyed individual in the eye and with as straight a face as you can manage, say, “Oh! How interesting!  Are you a monster, or just favorable to their cause?”

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

 

To Olddogs Loyal Readers

Below is something you must understand, accept and practice every day, if you and your family want to live free from tyranny. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation with profit as their only objective! You can piss and moan all you want to, but that will not change!

My objective is to show you information that supports that and also information that is a guide to becoming free from their control. Hence, Anna Maria Von Reitz and Her guide to escape the Corporate juggernaut-(a force that is relentlessly destructive, crushing, and insensitive).

Also you will find articles that show you without doubt that these Corporations are in charge of creating a blanket of tyranny over your life and smothering any attempts to escape, by presenting them as a good thing for everyone. Those of you who have accepted their version of diversity- (ethnic variety, as well as socioeconomic and gender variety, in a group, society, government, or institution) are being taken for a ride to hell.

By making everyone feel guilty for our natural human nature they make everything look like they are suffering. When in truth, they feel the same desire to congregate with their own ethnicity- (ethnic affiliation or distinctiveness). If you show respect for them, they will show respect for you, and intermarriage is not required.

This is why you will find a large variety of subjects presented on my sites and it is to your advantage to read them all, even if it is a subject you are not interested in. We are confronted by an enormous configuration of subject matter that attempts to hide the truth. This is no time to be lazy.

It takes quite a while to bring your knowledge up to snuff and the globalist are biting us on the backside, so don’t make the mistake that we have all the time in the world to change things. WE DON’T!

And if you think things are bad now, just wait until they are in complete control and there is no way back. Think of a prison with five hundred foot tall concrete walls, with a helicopter as the only way in and out.

An ESSAY ON THE TRIAL BY JURY By LYSANDER SPOONER

November 29th, 2017 by

http://www.barefootsworld.net/trial01.html#p4

Olddogs Comments!

I am sure that most of you have daily obligations that take time to complete, but if you want to be free from this tyrannical bunch of corporations you think are our government; you must find the time to

learn the truth!

Remember this! In Common Law, if there is no injured party there is no crime!

Our present judicial system is nothing but a method of stealing your money and freedom!

Note: Before you send your children to collage make sure they have read this complete essay. The return to our original government is a long fight that is totally dependent of the people’s knowledge.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1852, by

LYSANDER SPOONER,

In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of Massachusetts.

NOTICE TO ENGLISH PUBLISHERS

The author claims the copyright of this book in England, on Common Law principles, without regard to acts of parliament; and if the main principle of the book itself be true, viz., that no legislation, in conflict with the Common Law, is of any validity, his claim is a legal one. He forbids any one to reprint the book without his consent.

Stereotyped by
HOBART & ROBBINS;
New England Type and Stereotype Foundery,
BOSTON.

3

N0TE

This volume, it is presumed by the author, gives what will generally be considered satisfactory evidence,- though not all the evidence,- of what the Common Law trial by jury really is. In a future volume, if it should be called for, it is designed to corroborate the grounds taken in this; give a concise view of the English constitution; show the unconstitutional character of the existing government in England, and the unconstitutional means by which the trial by jury has been broken down in practice; prove that, neither in England nor the United States, have legislatures ever been invested by the people with any authority to impair the powers, change the oaths, or (with few exceptions) abridge the jurisdiction, of juries, or select jurors on any other than Common Law principles; and, consequently, that, in both countries, legislation is still constitutionally subordinate to the discretion and consciences of Common Law juries, in all cases, both civil and criminal, in which juries sit. The same volume will probably also discuss several political and legal questions, which will naturally assume importance if the trial by jury should be reestablished.

NOTE: Only chapter one is printed in this letter, the rest make be found at

http://www.barefootsworld.net/trial01.html#p4

TRIAL BY JURY

CHAPTER I

THE RIGHT OF JURIES TO JUDGE OF THE JUSTICE OF LAWS

SECTION I.

FOR more than six hundred years – that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215 – there has been no clearer principle of English or American constitutional law, than that, in criminal cases, it is not only the right and duty of juries to judge what are the facts, what is the law, and what was the moral intent of the accused; but that it is also their right, and their primary and paramount duty, to judge of the justice of the law, and to hold all laws invalid, that are, in their opinion, unjust or oppressive, and all persons guiltless in violating, or resisting the execution of, such laws.

Unless such be the right and duty of jurors, it is plain that, instead of juries being a “palladium of liberty “- a barrier against the tyranny and oppression of the government – they are really mere tools in its hands, for carrying into execution any injustice and oppression it may desire to have executed.

But for their right to judge of the law, and the justice of the law, juries would be no protection to an accused person, even as to matters of fact; for, if the government can dictate to a jury any law whatever, in a criminal case, it can certainly dictate to them the laws of evidence. That is, it can dictate what evidence is admissible, and what inadmissible, and also what force or weight is to be given to the evidence admitted. And if the government can thus dictate to a jury the laws of evidence, it can not only make it necessary for them to convict on a partial exhibition of the evidence rightfully pertaining to the case, but it can even require them to convict on any evidence whatever that it pleases to offer them.

6

That the rights and duties of jurors must necessarily be such as are here claimed for them, will be evident when it is considered what the trial by jury is, and what is its object. “The trial by jury,” then, is a “trial by the country” – that is, by the people – as distinguished from a trial by the government.

It was anciently called “trial per pais” – that is, “trial by the country.” And now, in every criminal trial, the jury are told that the accused “has, for trial, put himself upon the country; which country you (the jury) are.” The object of this trial “by the country,” or by the people, in preference to a trial by the government, is to guard against every species of oppression by the government. In order to effect this end, it is indispensable that the people, or “the country,” judge of and determine their own liberties against the government; instead of the government’s judging of and determining its own powers over the people. How is it possible that juries can do anything to protect the liberties of the people against the government, if they are not allowed to determine what those liberties are?

Any government, that is its own judge of, and determines authoritatively for the people, what are its own powers over the people, is an absolute government of course. It has all the powers that it chooses to exercise. There is no other – or at least no more accurate – definition of a despotism than this. On the other hand, any people, that judge of, and determine authoritatively for the government, what are their own liberties against the government, of course retain all the liberties they wish to enjoy. And this is freedom. At least, it is freedom to them; because, although it may be theoretically imperfect, it, nevertheless, corresponds to their highest notions of freedom.

To secure this right of the people to judge of their own liberties against the government, the jurors are taken, (or must be, to make them lawful jurors,} from the body of the people, by lot, or by some process that precludes any previous knowledge, choice, or selection of them, on the part of the government.

7

This is done to prevent the government’s constituting a jury of its own partisans or friends; in other words, to prevent the government’s packing a jury, with a view to maintain its own laws, and accomplish its own purposes.

It is supposed that, if twelve men be taken, by lot, from the mass of the people, without the possibility of any previous knowledge, choice, or selection of them, on the part of the government, the jury will be a fair epitome of “the country” at large, and not merely of the party or faction that sustain the measures of the government; that substantially all classes of opinions, prevailing among the people, will be represented in the jury; and especially that the opponents of the government, (if the government have any opponents,) will be represented there, as well as its friends; that the classes, who are oppressed by the laws of the government, (if any are thus oppressed,) will have their representatives in the jury, as well as those classes, who take sides with the oppressor – that is, with the government.

It is fairly presumable that such a tribunal will agree to no conviction except such as substantially the whole country would agree to, if they were present, taking part in the trial. A trial by such a tribunal is, therefore, in effect, “a trial by the country.” In its results it probably comes as near to a trial by the whole country, as any trial that it is practicable to have, without too great inconvenience and expense. And. as unanimity is required for a conviction, it follows that no one can be convicted, except for the violation of such laws as substantially the whole country wish to have maintained. The government can enforce none of its laws, (by punishing offenders, through the verdicts of juries,) except such as substantially the whole people wish to have enforced. The government, therefore, consistently with the trial by jury, can exercise no powers over the people, (or, what is the same thing, over the accused person, who represents the rights of the people,) except such as substantially the whole people of the country consent that it may exercise. In such a trial, therefore, “the country,” or the people, judge of and determine their own liberties against the government, instead of thegovernment’s judging of and determining its own powers over the people.

8

But all this “trial by the country” would be no trial at all “by the country,” but only a trial by the government, if the government ‘could either declare who may, and who may not, be jurors, or could dictate to the jury anything whatever, either of law or evidence, that is of the essence of the trial.

If the government may decide who may, and who may not, be jurors, it will of course select only its partisans, and those friendly to its measures. It may not only prescribe who may, and who may not, be eligible to be drawn as jurors; but it may also question each person drawn as a juror, as to his sentiments in regard to the particular law involved in each trial, before suffering him to be sworn on the panel; and exclude him if he be found unfavorable to the maintenance of such a law. [1]

9

So, also, if the government may dictate to the jury what laws they are to enforce, it is no longer a ” trial by the country,” but a trial by the government; because the jury then try the accused, not by any standard of their own – not by their own judgments of their rightful liberties – but by a standard. dictated to them by the government. And the standard, thus dictated by the government, becomes the measure of the people’s liberties. If the government dictate the standard of trial, it of course dictates the results of the trial. And such a trial is no trial by the country, but only a trial by the government; and in it the government determines what are its own powers over the people, instead of the people’s determining what are their own liberties against the government. In short, if the jury have no right to judge of the justice of a law of the government, they plainly can do nothing to protect the people against the oppressions of the government; for there are no oppressions which the government may not authorize by law.

The jury are also to judge whether the laws are rightly expounded to them by the court. Unless they judge on this point, they do nothing to protect their liberties against the oppressions that are capable of being practiced under cover of a corrupt exposition of the laws. If the judiciary can authoritatively dictate to a jury any exposition of the law, they can dictate to them the law itself, and such laws as they please; because laws are, in practice, one thing or another, according as they are expounded.

10

The jury must also judge whether there really be any such law, (be it good or bad,) as the accused is charged with having transgressed. Unless they judge on this point, the people are liable to have their liberties taken from them by brute force, without any law at all.

The jury must also judge of the laws of evidence. If the government can dictate to a jury the laws of evidence, it can not only shut out any evidence it pleases, tending to vindicate the accused, but it can require that any evidence whatever, that it pleases to offer, be held as conclusive proof of any offence whatever which the government chooses to allege.

It is manifest, therefore, that the jury must judge of and try the whole case, and every part and parcel of the case, free of any dictation or authority on the part of the government. They must judge of the existence of the law; of the true exposition of the law; of the justice of the law; and of the admissibility and weight of all the evidence offered; otherwise the government will have everything its own way; the jury will be mere puppets in the hands of the government: and the trial will be, in reality, a trial by the government, and not a “trial by the country.” By such trials the government will determine its own powers over the people, instead of the people’s determining their own liberties against the government; and it will be an entire delusion to talk, as for centuries we have done, of the trial by jury, as a “palladium of liberty,” or as any protection to the people against the oppression and tyranny of the government.

The question, then, between trial by jury, as thus described, and trial by the government, is simply a question between liberty and despotism. The authority to judge what are the powers of the government, and what the liberties of the people, must necessarily be vested in one or the other of the parties themselves – the government, or the people; because there is no third party to whom it can be entrusted. If the authority be vested in the government, the government is absolute, and the people have no liberties except such as the government sees fit to indulge them with. If, on the other hand, that authority be vested in the people, then the people have all liberties, (as against the government,) except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) choose to disclaim; and the government can exercise no power except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) consent that it may exercise.

11

SECTI0N I I.

The force and. justice of the preceding argument cannot be evaded by saying that the government is chosen by the people; that, in theory, it represents the people; that it is designed to do the will of the people; that its members are all sworn to observe the fundamental or constitutional law instituted by the people; that its acts are therefore entitled to be considered the acts of the people; and that to allow a jury, representing the people, to invalidate the acts of the government, would therefore be arraying the people against themselves.

There are two answers to such an argument.

One answer is, that, in a representative government, there is no absurdity or contradiction, nor any arraying of the people against themselves, in requiring that the statutes or enactments of the government shall pass the ordeal of any number of separate tribunals, before it shall be determined that they are to have the force of laws. Our American constitutions have provided five of these separate tribunals, to wit, representatives, senate, executive, [2] jury, and judges; and have made it necessary that each enactment shall pass the ordeal of all these separate tribunals, before its authority can be established by the punishment of those who choose to transgress it. And there is no more absurdity or inconsistency in making a jury one of these several tribunals, than there is in making the representatives, or the senate, or the executive, or the judges, one of them. There is no more absurdity in giving a jury a veto upon the laws, than there is in giving a veto to each of these other tribunals. The people are no more arrayed against themselves, when a jury puts its veto upon a statute, which the other tribunals have sanctioned, than they are when the same veto is exercised by the representatives, the senate, the executive, or the judges.

12

But another answer to the argument that the people are arrayed against themselves, when a jury hold an enactment of the government invalid, is, that the government, and all the departments of the government, are merely the servants and agents of the people; not invested with arbitrary or absolute authority to bind the people, but required to submit all their enactments to the judgment of a tribunal more fairly representing the whole people, before they carry them into execution, by punishing any individual for transgressing them. If the government were not thus required to submit their enactments to the judgment of “the country,” before executing them upon individuals – if, in other words, the people had reserved to themselves no veto upon the acts of the government, the government, instead of being a mere servant and agent of the people, would be an absolute despot over the people. It would have all power in its own hands; because the power to punish carries all other powers with it. A power that can, of itself, and by its own authority, punish disobedience, can compel obedience and submission, and is above all responsibility for the character of its laws. In short, it is a despotism.

And it is of no consequence to inquire how a government came by this power to punish, whether by prescription, by inheritance, by usurpation. or by delegation from the people’s If it have now but got it, the government is absolute.

It is plain, therefore, that if the people have invested the government with power to make laws that absolutely bind the people, and to punish the people for transgressing those laws, the people have surrendered their liberties unreservedly into the hands of the government.

It is of no avail to say, in answer to this view of the ease, that in surrendering their liberties into the hands of the government, the people took an oath from the government, that it would exercise its power within certain constitutional limits; for when did oaths ever restrain a government that was otherwise unrestrained? Or when did a government fail to determine that all its acts were within the constitutional and authorized limits of its power, if it were permitted to determine that question for itself?

13

Neither is it of any avail to say, that, if the government abuse its power, and enact unjust and oppressive laws, the government may be changed by the influence of discussion, and the exercise of the right of suffrage. Discussion can do nothing to prevent the enactment, or procure the repeal, of unjust laws, unless it be understood that, the discussion is to be followed by resistance. Tyrants care nothing for discussions that are to end only in discussion. Discussions, which do not interfere with the enforcement of their laws, are but idle wind to them. Suffrage is equally powerless and unreliable. It can be exercised only periodically; and the tyranny must at least be borne until the time for suffrage comes. Be sides, when the suffrage is exercised, it gives no guaranty for the repeal of existing laws that are oppressive, and no security against the enactment of new ones that are equally so. The second body of legislators are liable and likely to be just as tyrannical as the first. If it be said that the second body may be chosen for their integrity, the answer is, that the first were chosen for that very reason, and yet proved tyrants. The second will be exposed to the same temptations as the first, and will be just as likely to prove tyrannical. Who ever heard that succeeding legislatures were, on the whole, more honest than those that preceded them? What is there in the nature of men or things to make them so? If it be said that the first body were chosen from motives of injustice, that fact proves that there is a portion of society who desire to establish injustice; and if they were powerful or artful enough to procure the election of their instruments to compose the first legislature, they will be likely to be powerful or artful enough to procure the election of the same or similar instruments to compose the second. The right of suffrage, therefore, and even a change of legislators, guarantees no change of legislation – certainly no change for the better. Even if a change for the better actually comes, it comes too late, because it comes only after more or less injustice has been irreparably done.

14

But, at best, the right of suffrage can be exercised only periodically; and between the periods the legislators are wholly irresponsible. No despot was ever more entirely irresponsible than are republican legislators during the period for which they are chosen. They can neither, be removed from their office, nor called to account while in their office, nor punished after they leave their office, be their tyranny what it may. Moreover, the judicial and executive departments of the government are equally irresponsible to the people, and are only responsible, (by impeachment, and dependence for their salaries), to these irresponsible legislators. This dependence of the judiciary and executive upon the legislature is a guaranty that they will always sanction and execute its laws, whether just or unjust. Thus the legislators hold the whole power of the government in their hands, and are at the same time utterly irresponsible for the manner in which they use it.

If, now, this government, (the three branches thus really united in one), can determine the validity of, and enforce, its own laws, it is, for the time being, entirely absolute, and wholly irresponsible to the people.

But this is not all. These legislators, and this government, so irresponsible while in power, can perpetuate their power at pleasure, if they can determine what legislation is authoritative upon the people, and can enforce obedience to it, for they can not only declare their power perpetual, but they can enforce submission to all legislation that is necessary to secure its perpetuity. They can, for example, prohibit all discussion of the rightfulness of their authority; forbid the use of the suffrage; prevent the election of any successors; disarm, plunder, imprison, and even kill all who refuse submission. If, therefore, the government (all departments united) be absolute for a day – that is, if it can, for a day, enforce obedience to its own laws – it can, in that day, secure its power for all time – like the queen, who wished to reign but for a day, but in that day caused the king, her husband, to be slain, and usurped his throne.

Nor will it avail to say that such acts would be unconstitutional, and that unconstitutional acts may be lawfully resisted; for everything a government pleases to do will, of course, be determined to be constitutional, if the government itself be permitted to determine the question of the constitutionality of its own acts. Those who are capable of tyranny, are capable of perjury to sustain it.

15

The conclusion, therefore, is, that any government, that can, for a day, enforce its own laws, without appealing to the people, (or to a tribunal fairly representing the people,) for their consent, is, in theory, an absolute government, irresponsible to the people, and can perpetuate its power at pleasure.

The trial by jury is based upon a recognition of this principle, and therefore forbids the government to execute any of its laws, by punishing violators, in any case whatever, without first getting the consent of “the country,” or the people, through a jury. In this way, the people, at all times, hold their liberties in their own hands, and never surrender them, even for a moment, into the hands of the government.

The trial by jury, then, gives to any and every individual the liberty, at any time, to disregard or resist any law whatever of the government, if he be willing to submit to the decision of a jury, the questions, whether the law be intrinsically just and obligatory? and whether his conduct, in disregarding or resisting it, were right in itself? And any law, which does not, in such trial, obtain the unanimous sanction of twelve men, taken at random from the people, and judging according to the standard of justice in their own minds, free from all dictation and authority of the government, may be transgressed and resisted with impunity, by whomsoever pleases to transgress or resist it. [3]

The trial by jury authorizes all this, or it is a sham and a hoax, utterly worthless for protecting the people against oppression. If it do not authorize an individual to resist the first and least act of injustice or tyranny, on the part of the government, it does not authorize him to resist the last and the greatest. If it do not authorize individuals to nip tyranny in the bud, it does not authorize them to cut it down when its branches are filled with the ripe fruits of plunder and oppression.

16

Those who deny the right of a jury to protect an individual in resisting an unjust law of the government, deny him all defence whatsoever against oppression. The right of revolution, which tyrants, in mockery, accord to mankind, is no legal right under a government; it is only a natural right to overturn a government. The government itself never acknowledges this right. And the right is practically established only when and because the government, no longer exists to call it in question. The right, therefore, can be exercised with impunity, only when it is exercised victoriously. All unsuccessful attempts at revolution, however justifiable in themselves, are punished as treason, if the government be permitted to judge of the treason. The government itself never admits the injustice of its laws, as a legal defence for those who have attempted a revolution, and failed. The right of revolution, therefore, is right of no practical value, except for those who are stronger than the government. So long, therefore, as the oppressions of a government are kept within such limits as simply not to exasperate against it a power greater than its own, the right of revolution cannot be appealed to, and is therefore inapplicable to the case. This affords a wide field for tyranny; and, if a jury cannot here intervene, the oppressed are utterly defenceless.

It is manifest that the only security against the tyranny of the government lies in forcible resistance to the execution of the injustice; because the injustice will certainly be executed, unless it be forcibly resisted. And if it be but suffered to be executed, it must then be borne; for the government never makes compensation for its own wrongs.

Since, then, this forcible resistance to the injustice of the government is the only possible means of preserving liberty, it is indispensable to all legal liberty that this resistance should be legalized. It is perfectly self-evident that where there is no legal right to resist the oppression of the government, there can be no legal liberty. And here it is all-important to notice, that, practically speaking, there can be no legal right to resist the oppressions of the government, unless there be some legal tribunal, other than the government, and wholly independent of, and above, the government, to judge between the government and those who resist its oppressions; in other words, to judge what laws of the government are to be

17

obeyed, and what may be resisted and held for nought. The only tribunal known to our laws, for this purpose, is a jury. If a jury have not the right to judge between the government and those who disobey its laws, and resist its oppressions, the government is absolute, and the people, legally speaking are slaves. Like many other slaves they may have sufficient courage and strength to keep their masters somewhat in check; but they are nevertheless known to the law only as slaves.

That this right of resistance was recognized as a common law right, when the ancient and genuine trial by jury was in force, is not only proved by the nature of the trial itself, but is acknowledged by history. [4]

This right of resistance is recognized by the constitution of the United States, as a strictly legal and constitutional right. It is so recognized, first by the provision that “the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury” – that is, by the country – and not by the government; secondly, by the provision that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This constitutional security for “the right to keep and bear arms,” implies the right to use them – as much as a constitutional security for the right to buy and keep food would have implied the right to eat it. The constitution, therefore, takes it for granted that

18

the people will judge of the conduct of the government, and that, as they have the right, they will also have the sense, to use arms, whenever the necessity of the case justifies it. And it is a sufficient and legal defence for a person accused of using arms against the government, if he can show, to the satisfaction of a jury, or even any one of a jury, that the law he resisted was an unjust one.

In the American State constitutions also, this right of resistance to the oppressions of the government is recognized, in various ways, as a natural, legal, and constitutional right. In the first place, it is so recognized by provisions establishing the trial by jury; thus requiring that accused persons shall be tried by “the country,” instead of the government. In the second place, it is recognized by many of them, as, for example, those of Massachusetts, Maine, Vermont, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida, by provisions expressly declaring that the people shall have the right to bear arms. In many of them also, as, for example, those of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Florida, Iowa, and Arkansas, by provisions, in their bills of rights, declaring that men have a natural, inherent, and inalienable right of “defending their lives and liberties.” This, of course, means that they have a right to defend them against any injustice on the part of the government, and not merely on the part of private individuals; because the object of all bills of rights is to assert the rights of individuals and the people, as against the government, and not as against private persons. It would be a matter of ridiculous supererogation to assert, in a constitution of government, the natural right of men to defend their lives and liberties against private trespassers.

Many of these bills of rights also assert the natural right of all men to protect their property – that is, to protect it against the government. It would be unnecessary and silly indeed to assert, in a constitution of government, the natural right of individuals to protect their property against thieves and robbers.

18

The constitutions of New Hampshire and Tennessee also declare that “The doctrine of non-resistance against arbitrary power and oppression is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”

The legal effect of these constitutional recognitions of the right of individuals to defend their property, liberties, and lives, ‘ against the government, is to legalize resistance to all injustice and oppression, of every name and nature whatsoever, on the part of the government.

But for this right of resistance, on the part of the people, all governments would become tyrannical to a degree of which few people are aware. Constitutions are utterly worthless to restrain the tyranny of governments, unless it be understood that the people will, by force, compel the government to keep within the constitutional limits. Practically speaking, no government knows any limits to its power, except the endurance of the people. But that the people are stronger than the government, and will resist in extreme cases, our governments would be little or nothing else than organized systems of plunder and oppression. All, or nearly all, the advantage there is in fixing any constitutional limits to the power of a government, is simply to give notice to the government of the point at which it will meet with resistance. If the people are then as good as their word, they may keep the government within the bounds they have set for it; otherwise it will disregard them – as is proved by the example of all our American governments, in which the constitutions have all become obsolete, at the moment of their adoption, for nearly or quite all purposes except the appointment of officers, who at once become practically absolute, except so far as they are restrained by the fear of popular resistance.

The bounds set to the power of the government, by the trial by jury, as will hereafter be shown, are these – that the government shall never touch the property, person, or natural or civil rights of an individual, against his consent, {except for the purpose of bringing them before a jury for trial,) unless in pursuance and execution of a judgment, or decree, rendered by a jury in each individual case, upon such evidence, and such law, as are satisfactory to their own understandings and consciences, irrespective of all legislation of the government.

FOOTNOTES

[1]To show that this supposition is not an extravagant one, it may be mentioned that courts have repeatedly questioned jurors to ascertain whether they were prejudiced against the government – that is, whether they were in favor of, or opposed to, such laws of the government as were to be put in issue in the then pending trial. This was done (in 1851) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, by Peleg Sprague, the United States district judge, in empanelling three several juries for the trials of Scott, Hayden, and Morris, charged with having aided in the rescue of a fugitive slave from the custody of the United States deputy marshal. This judge caused the following question to be propounded to all the jurors separately; and those who answered unfavorably for the purposes of the government, were excluded from the panel.

“Do you hold any opinions upon the subject of the Fugitive Slave Law, so called, which will induce you to refuse to convict a person indicted under it, if the facts set forth, in the indictment, and constituting the offence, are proved against him, and the court direct you that the law is constitutional?”

The reason of this question was, that “the Fugitive Slave Law, so called,” was so obnoxious to a large portion of the people, as to render a conviction under it hopeless, if the jurors were taken indiscriminately from among the people.

A similar question was soon afterwards propounded to the persons drawn as jurors in the United States Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, by Benjamin R. Curtis, one of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, in empanelling a jury for the trial of the aforesaid Morris on the charge before mentioned; and those who did not answer the question favorably for the government were again excluded from the panel.

It has also been an habitual practice with the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, in empanelling juries for the trial of capital offences, to inquire of the persons drawn as jurors whether they had any conscientious scruples against finding verdicts of guilty in such eases; that is, whether they had any conscientious scruples against sustaining the law prescribing death as the punishment of the crime to be trick; and to exclude from the panel all who answered in the affirmative.

The only principle upon which these questions are asked, is this – that no man shall be allowed to serve as juror, unless he be ready to enforce any enactment of the government, however cruel or tyrannical it may be.

What is such a jury good for, as a protection against the tyranny of the government? A jury like that is palpably nothing but, a mere tool of oppression in the hands of the government. A trial by such a jury is really a trial by the government itself – and not a trial by the country – because it is a trial only by men specially selected by the government for their readiness to enforce its own tyrannical measures.

If that be the true principle of the trial by jury, the trial is utterly worthless as a security to liberty. The Czar might, with perfect safety to his authority, introduce the trial by jury into Russia, if he could but be permitted to select his jurors from those who were ready to maintain his laws, without regard to their injustice.

This example is sufficient to show that the very pith of the trial by jury, as a safeguard to liberty, consists in the jurors being taken indiscriminately from the whole people, and in their right to hold invalid all laws which they think unjust.

[2] The executive has a qualified veto upon the passage of laws, in most of our governments, and an absolute veto, in all of them, upon the execution of any laws which he deems unconstitutional; because his oath to support the constitution (as he understands it) forbids him to execute any law that he deems unconstitutional.

[3] And if there be so much as a reasonable doubt of the justice of the laws, the benefit of that doubt must be given to the defendant, and not to the government. So that the government must keep its laws clearly within the limits of justice, if it would ask a jury to enforce them.

[4] Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. * * If a, vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. * * There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long-enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects’ swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king’s authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defense of public freedom.” – 3 Middle Age, 240-2.

And We Do the Hokey Pokey and We Turn It All Around….

November 28th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/and-we-do-hokey-pokey-and-we-turn-it.html

By Anna von Reitz

I want to assure everyone that there is no such thing as “the” New Republic.  There are fifty old republics, thank you, very much, and they are in the process of rebuilding themselves.  And that is a very good thing.

The actual government of this country is an unincorporated Body Politic.  It derives its sovereignty from our God-Given free will and our agreement to govern ourselves.  See The Mayflower Compact, The Declaration of Independence (original form known as “The Unanimous Declaration” is most informative) and The Supreme Republican Declaration of the United Colonies of America and the Statehood Compacts for each state of the Union.

Our government starts with the people at the top of the power structure and delegates “power” to townships, counties, states, and finally, bottom of the heap and only through the states, the federal government.

Notice that?  The federal government is the least powerful level of government with respect to our power structure, so how did everything get flipped on its head?

When the states and counties were seduced by federal racketeering kickbacks euphemistically called “federal revenue sharing and block grants” to form federal corporation franchises named after them—which occurred all over this country circa 1965—they gave the Federales an excuse to make false claims against the people of this country and our assets.

Instead of States obligated to serve us and our interests and uphold our Public Law, we were suddenly dealing with “States of States” like the “State of California” and masses of corporate franchise entities all claiming to have some authority or other over us, the living people and our public and private assets.

Bear in mind that those making these agreements to launch “federated states”  had no granted authority enabling them to incorporate our government or commit us or our resources to the tender mercies of any State of State.

As incorporated franchises of Federal Corporation parents, the States of State are part of a democracy, not any republic, and they are part of a power structure that is exactly opposite to our system.

In our system, individual people are supreme and supremely important.  The rights and sanctity of each one of us is upheld by our government and so are our property rights.

In their system, the individual has no rights and is subject to whatever the “majority” may dictate at any given time.  All property is communal in nature and used to hypothecate debt to service the government.

In our system all power flows from the people down through all the levels of government until at the very bottom of the totem pole the states join together and delegate nineteen “powers” to the so-called federal government.  In their system all power flows up to one dictatorial and all-powerful office of the “President” of the central corporations formed in the District of Columbia (though he is in fact subject to the shareholders).

Everyone is considered an employee or dependent of these various “federal” and “federal state” corporations and everyone is considered a “citizen”—subject to the government and over 80,000,000 government statutes, codes, and regulations, instead of the government being subject to the people. That is their system. Not ours.

In our system of government, nobody is a citizen until and unless they voluntarily step to the plate to serve the public interest of their state or county.  Every man and woman is free to live and grow and be and enjoy their private property, so long as they don’t harm anyone else or harm anyone else’s property.  Our public law is basically either The Ten Commandments (Old Testament) or The Golden Rule (New Testament) — and it is up to us to choose which law we live by and state it in court.

Beginning after the so-called Civil War the “federal government” which is actually a “government for-hire” here to provide specific governmental services under contract, organized itself as a corporation.  It did this mainly to avoid accountability for its acts and to secure bankruptcy protection for itself — the same motivations that prompt other quasi-criminal enterprises to incorporate.

So — from that day to this — all the “federal government” is, is another private corporation in the business of providing nineteen enumerated “delegated services”.

And like other for-profit corporations, it sub-contracts portions of its own contract out to still more privately owned and operated corporations— the so-called “federal agencies”: IRS, BATF, FEMA, FBI, CIA, etc., etc., etc.,

And you wonder why everything in this country is all screwed up?  Run amok? Why your government doesn’t serve you, and instead, seems intent on stealing everything in sight and harassing you day and night?

WAKE UP!  THEIR government is subject to your government, but you have to get on your hind legs, accept your responsibility to self-govern, and get organized to do it.

That is why I have been thumping on everyone for months to talk to your friends and neighbors and hold public meetings and get help from the Michigan General Jural Assembly folks.

Please think deeply about your future and the future of your country, because the two things go hand-in-hand.  If America goes down the drain, what happens to you and your family?  Time to get “highly motivated” and talk it up this Christmas season.  Stop thinking about getting involved and start acting upon your responsibility as an “elector”—-not a “voter”.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com

The Fifth of July

November 27th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/07/the-fifth-of-july-james-clinton-belcher.html#more

Olddogs Comments

Yes, I know I have posted this before but there are so many new readers that have not yet started using the archives I feel it is important to let them know something has been accomplished and to not lose heart. We will defeat these scumbags and restore freedom in America.

By James Clinton Belcher

Article # 648 http://www.annavonreitz.com/

Two hundred and forty-one years ago, if the history books are to be believed about anything, the original organizers of the government of this country were hard at work in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It was overcast and the dank, damp air rising from the squalid city streets combined with the heat of summer made John Adams describe the atmosphere as “fetid”.  The unanimous vote of the men representing the original thirteen Colonies in favor of The Declaration of Independence had — despite everything standing against it— passed.  It was a shock, even to them. 

How had it happened?  Nobody was quite sure.  Everyone had, for one reason or another, bet against it.  The South would never agree to that, and the North would never agree to another bit; Massachusetts would fight to the bitter end and so would South Carolina.  Nobody expected The Declaration to be accepted, and especially not after John Dickinson of Pennsylvania, a Tory and one of the great orators of his day, succeeded in requiring that the vote on The Declaration be unanimous.  

Even its most avid supporters sucked in their breath and gave The Declaration of Independence a wink and a prayer. 

My ancestors, lawyers who were neighbors of John Adams from Braintree, Massachusetts, preachers and tradesmen from Boston, and gentlemen farmers from Connecticut, were already with George Washington’s forces, fully engaged in fighting off the British Redcoats and their mercenaries.  Three hundred miles away, they wouldn’t hear the news from Philadelphia for a week or more. 

As the shock waves of the unanimous vote died slowly away, the members of the Continental Congress began to wake up to the new realities of July 5th, 1776. There was no longer any grey uncertainty about it.  They were at war and fully committed to it, do or die. There had to be a certain amount of grim relief in it.  After ten years and more of wobbling back and forth, it was finally decided. 

One is reminded of that moment when, having struggled with a terrible disease for a long time, the doctor finally delivers a diagnosis. Suddenly, the problem solidifies, takes on a name, dimensions, and a known character.   

So it is, that we, too, have come awake and begun the process of dealing with the consequences of our decisions.  Like our Forefathers, we face the razor-edge of supporting The Declaration of Independence with “our lives, our fortunes, and or sacred honor” — or not, in our own country.  

Throughout the world, people have looked to America as a beacon of hope, as the only nation to stand up for the Natural and Unalienable Rights of Mankind. Yet, progressively, for the past one hundred and fifty years of our history, we have been slowly undermined by those same foreign and mostly European powers that our ancestors fought for eight long years.  

Above and beyond any armies, we have had to contend with deceit and Breach of Trust from men and principalities formally committed to serve as our Trustees and as purveyors of “essential government services” working under commercial contract. These same proponents of Commercial Feudalism have sought to secretly undermine our lawful government since 1822, while pretending to be our friends and Allies.  

Just as secretively, they have used their pawns in the Bar Associations to enslave the living people of the world via the use of similar names deceits and a universal practice of the crimes of personage and barratry. 

They have kept us constantly embroiled in war after conflict after war throughout our history, never letting us rest or enjoy the fruits of our labor.  Always, England has served as the excuse for this, and the Papacy has stood by without the least regard for its Trustee responsibilities, and let it all happen.  

It comes as a great surprise to most Americans to know that they have a peacetime flag, the red-white-and-blue with vertical stripes; because they have been kept at constant war by these perpetrators, they only know the wartime flag, the “Stars and Stripes”.  

It also comes as a great surprise to most Americans to realize that the actual government of this country is still centered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and that the “U.S. Government” in Washington, DC, is — and has always been — a foreign entity perched on our shores, tasked with providing nineteen enumerated services on a for-hire basis.

And no doubt, it comes as a great surprise that America has a hereditary Head of State, when in fact we had all hoped to leave such feudalistic practices behind in a distant and unpleasant past.  

Like my ancestors in the battles of the Potomac and Bunker Hill and White Plains and Ticonderoga, I am devoted to the principles of freedom and individual sovereignty.  Like them, I find it repugnant that any man should rule over another. 

I regard self-rule as the ultimate goal— that we should each know and rule ourselves according to our own conscience, and choose such godly principles that any interference of government in our lives is rendered totally unnecessary. 

All that said, the corruption in Washington, DC, had reached such a fever-pitch and the personage and barratry being practiced in our courts was creating such destruction, that something had to be done.  I, despite my misgivings, had to exercise the hereditary office as American Head of State, to bring correction and restoration. 

Do not be deceived by any new corporation taking over the reins in Washington, DC., and proclaiming themselves some kind of “republic”.  A corporation is incapable of being a republic by definition.  

Only you and your neighbors joining together and learning to operate your own government are capable of forming and preserving the republican state governments you are owed.  The actual states are named simply, like this:  Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas….   The unincorporated businesses charged with conducting the affairs of the actual states are named like this: Alabama State, Alaska State, Arizona State, Arkansas State….. 

All these organizations that you see operating as “States of States” like State of Washington and State of Louisiana are merely franchises of the Territorial federal government.  All the “STATES OF STATES” like the STATE OF WISCONSIN and STATE OF IDAHO are similarly franchises of the Municipal federal government, and strictly speaking, shouldn’t even be on our soil.  

A great deal of self-interested pillaging and plundering has taken place in America as a result of the mismanagement and dishonesty of both the Territorial and Municipal Governments.  The Congress in presiding over both these foreign governments has proven both incompetent and disloyal to their true duty to the American states and people. 

 Beginning in 2007 and continuing more or less unabated through 2015, a Master Plan was put in motion by corrupt mostly foreign banking interests to pull off a reprise of the Great Fraud practiced upon us by Franklin Delano Roosevelt.  

On that occasion, similar names deceits mis-characterizing the Trade Names of American landsmen as Foreign Situs Trusts belonging to the bankrupt United States of America, Incorporated, were used to set up a process of debt assumption, by which millions of innocent Americans and their assets were “presumed” to be franchises of the failed corporation and collateral for its debts. 

Three generations of Americans have toiled as debt slaves and given up large percentages of our private earnings to pay off the debts of this foreign, mostly privately owned governmental services corporation merely calling itself the “United States of America”—-Incorporated.  It was finally released from bankruptcy November 7, 1999. 

This was the greatest hoax and con game in world history up until that time, and we, Americans, were the Fall Guys.  This was set up, administered, and executed by the British Government and British Crown, both obligated by solemn treaty to act as our Trustees on “the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways” —which is precisely the jurisdiction where this travesty occurred— and also obligated to act with “perpetual friendship and amity”.  

The most recent plan to feed upon us was even worse.  The perpetrators — the Municipal Government — doing business as the “UNITED STATES”, intended to spend itself into oblivion, declare bankruptcy, and saddle Americans with its debts for the next five hundred years.  Worse, they intended to foreclose on our ESTATES and make false claims on abandonment, allowing their own Secondary Creditors to come in and seize our lands and homes and conscript us to forced labor—- again, to pay their private debts. 

Think of it as FDR on methylethyl amphetamines, a juggernaut of planned deceits, secretive bankruptcy proceedings, and legalistic mumbo-jumbo designed to put a gloss — literally, “an appearance” — of judicial process on these flagrantly unlawful acts of international inland piracy.  

To put frosting on this cake of infamy and betrayal of trust, Barack Hussein Obama not only bankrupted the UNITED STATES, as planned, he also bankrupted the USA, INC., leaving no federal corporation in charge of providing the stipulated nineteen enumerated services due.  This, in effect, vacated the actual Constitution, as there was no longer a competent “federal partner” available to perform the duties.  

Instead, bankruptcy trustees named by the Secondary Creditors— international banks— would be appointed by default to administer things however they saw fit!!!

 Against this backdrop, in November of 2015, we took action to fill the gap and forestall this outcome.   Acting as Head of State for the unincorporated (actual) United States of America, I contracted with the Native nations of the Athabascans and Lakota Sioux, to become the new federal service providers.  

As a precaution, I also issued new Sovereign Letters Patent, and we also issued a Joint Declaration of Sovereignty with our new federal partners, upholding The Declaration of Independence and expanding it to include all Americans.  

We are set upon a path to correct the errors of the past and clean up the disgusting mess in Washington, DC.  Please spread the word to all Americans everywhere on Earth.  

We waited until the last minute, hoping that the Queen and the British Crown and the Pope and all those others responsible for this Mess would do the right thing and take corrective action, but on June 29, 2017, we entered our claim to restore all land and land assets to the American states and people they naturally belong to.  We gave the rats three days Notice, which is all we owed them, in consideration of the extensive efforts made to give sufficient International Notice for the past ten years. 

When they bankrupted the UNITED STATES, they also bankrupted all its franchises— including the UNITED KINGDOM, ELIZABETH II, FRANCISCUS, FRANCE, STATE OF UTAH, and JOHN QUINCY DOE.   All the land assets and monetary assets attached to these Cestui Que Vie Trusts were supposed to be a giant worldwide Slush Fund.  The perpetrators would simply change their doing business names, make claims on abandonment, and inherit it all!!!  

All the “little people” thus defrauded would be reduced to a condition of eternal slavery and statelessness, adrift forever, and eternally press-ganged into the service of Her Majesty’s Royal Navy and British Crown Merchant Marine Service. 

What they couldn’t take by force, they fully intended to take by fraud and deceit, bogus bankruptcy actions and equally bogus probate processes.  There was just one thing standing in the way of this multi-generational fraud: the American people. 

 The Americans are the actual Paramount Security Interest Holders and Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES and all its various franchises.  

The plot to take over the entire world and enter it into a new era of enslavement and Commercial Feudalism—- a New Dark Ages—- could only succeed as long as the Americans failed to come forward and claim their due.  And how could they come forward?  They had all been carefully stripped of standing, insurance, equitable title….  

We overcame all that and on June 29, 2017— we claimed our rights as the Paramount Security Interest Holders of the UNITED STATES.  That makes us the Paramount Security Interest Holders in all the various franchises and rolls over the title to FRANCE, the UNITED KINGDOM, and so much else to our control. 

Today, the Fourth of July, it is my great pleasure to declare that the forces of darkness, deceit, and evil in our midst have been defeated.  A new day of freedom and abundance for all Mankind is dawning.  

We will not turn back from the Great Work that our hands are set to.  Washington, DC will be cleaned up and cleaned out.  Restoration of the government that the people are owed will sweep across this country from one end to the other, with your help.  Here and throughout the world, there will be peace and kindness and plenty for all.  

This Fourth of July is the true beginning of a new world.  I invite you all to do your best to understand these changes, why they are happening, and to thank Almighty God, the Creator of Our Blessings, for His kindness to us and His steadfast care and wisdom, which has allowed the meek to triumph and literally inherit the Earth. 

Tomorrow, is the Fifth of July — the first day forward for us all.  I invite you all to search your souls and join us in flying the Peacetime Flag, known as the U.S. Civil Flag — from now on.  This version of the red-white-and-blue has vertical stripes and a white corner panel with blue stars.  It is your flag every bit as much as the Stars and Stripes.  Fly it proudly and happily as your sign and symbol that peace has finally come, not only to our nation, but to the world.  These flags are available, together with their history at:

http://www.annavonreitz.com/order.html

http://www.uscivilflags.org/articles-history.html

Veterans— I want you to know that I am a Son of the Revolution.  My family has been here and fought in every skirmish since 1609.  I am a United States Air Force veteran, honorably discharged, and a Lifetime member of the AmVets.  Just because I declare the peace does not mean that I fail to understand war. I am 100% behind our veterans, guaranteeing their pensions, benefits owed, and even expanding those services that have not been provided before.  

This is a new America, an America at peace— but that peace has only been made possible by men of war and the grace of God.

See this article and over 600 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

 

AMERICA IS IRREDEEMABLE

November 25th, 2017 by

http://anationbeguiled.com/?p=14722

 By Olddog

Due to the near total disinterest in recovering our original form of Government where each State was an unencumbered Nation, free to choose their own form of governance, it is apparent that freedom is 

IRREDEEMABLE! This is the results of the world’s most wealthy families gaining control of Banking and governments.

Their most successful method of doing this was and remains the pitiful lack of involvement by the citizens of each Nation who thinks nothing of being sent to war with their fellow humans to further the Bankers power over everyone, but refuse to eliminate the few families who have enslaved them. Not from lack of courage, but from being uninterested enough to wonder why so many human beings have to die for nations to get along.

It must be a lack of compassion for their fellow humans for them to be so easy to control, and control is exactly what the Bankers are masters of. It seems that some of us are just born with a mean nature which makes others easy to be manipulated by the Government education system and media industry.

Now we have a situation where the vast majority of incorporated Nations and their incorporated Governments are in debt to the rich and powerful few who manipulate them to gain more and more control of the world’s resources, while the living people suffer lower and lower standards of living, right down to starving to death.

This enormous and irredeemable tragedy has not escaped the attention of those with their eyes open and a personal constitution to be concerned for the people’s future and have done many years of research on the situation, but few there are who have been saved by the knowledge they gained, as the trap is as sticky as fly paper and few if any have escaped the system.

The most horrible of human falibilities has enabled the Governments and media to make their own people killers of other people and without remorse which pacifies their conscience with self adulation. Every soldier wants to be considered a hero, as cowardice is hard to live with and many a young man has had that drilled into them on the football field, which is one of the most effective manipulating methods used by public education. God only knows how many young men have evolved into absolute brutes by the coaches who shamed them for not having a killer instinct. In fact, I believe all physical sports have this in common as winning is the only object and defeat is evidence of a lack of aggression. Physical sports are nothing but a specialized method of dehumanizing young men. The killer instinct is king.

If half as much effort was put into increasing their intellect maybe they would learn what their government education has done to their nation and their families, neighbors, and just plain old Americans. I can just visualize the hate mail I will receive for stating this undeniable fact.

But, the truth is humans are easy to manipulate and many have suffered the consequences without even knowing what was done to them. As an example: Just about every nation on this planet has been manipulated into giving up their freedom and happiness by the lust for money and power these rich families have, and very few have a clue how and why it happened. I cannot even begin to imagine how wonderful our lives could have been if it were not for the bastards that bought off our founding politicians and we wound up with leaders whose love for money and power enabled them to dumb down millions of people with stories, pictures, sports, and a pitiful excuse for education.

As an example of what most Americans could have been like; take a look at the articles of a grandmother who was protected from this kind of upbringing at this link. http://www.annavonreitz.com/   This woman must have an IQ out the roof to do the research she has done, and all for our benefit. But the beauty of it all is the down to earth way she writes, with no other objective than to save her country from this bunch of despicable killers called politicians and bankers. Within the more than 700 articles on her site one will find the most amazing mind ever to grace the united States of America, and all for the benefit of her fellow Americans. This remarkable woman has more or less given her life for our recovery so we could learn how and why our government has enslaved us and robbed us until the people are so disconnected they are lost and starving both physically and mentally, all because they are totally self centered and have no determination or internal compass to find their way. Reading is NOT that hard!

 

Sadly, she is pissing in the wind because of the neer total lack of people being capable of understanding they are slaves on their way to elimination.

Anna Von Reitz, my dear, I would give both my legs for half of your intellect.

Your Olddog

It’s Time to Start Imagining a Post-Police World – Why Abolishing the Police is Not a Crazy Idea

November 24th, 2017 by

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/abolishing-police-force-crazy/

Abolishing American police might be our only hope to reform police brutality, violence, and skyrocketing incarceration rate.

By Claire Bernish

Are police necessary? Although this existential question often produces a knee-jerk ‘of course they are, who would protect us?’ a growing call for the abolition of police — and working examples to back it up — deserves more than scornful dismissal, particularly amid epidemic-level violence by agents of the state.

Police are under no obligation to protect the public they putatively serve — a series of state and Supreme Court decisions stretching back more than three decades indisputably establish this fact — so the lingering question, ‘who will protect us?’ is of no consequence to the case for dismantling every police department in the nation.

On the contrary, police kill, maim, intimidate, harass, and generally brutalize the citizenry with alarming frequency — and rarely face consequences beyond a paid vacation farcically termed ‘administrative leave’ for doing so.

Rather than fight and solve violent crimes, police act as little more than heavily militarized code-enforcers, or as David Graeber of the London School of Economics aptly terms, “bureaucrats with weapons” — protecting us from broken tail lights, missing front license plates, and imperfect lane changes more often than from robbery, homicide, and rape.

Give police the equipment and weapons of war under the premise of fighting terrorism, when terrorism is all but nonexistent, and predictably, they will go to war. As Abraham Maslow posited in 1966 in a concept known as the law of the instrument, “I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail.”

We, the citizenry, are not nails to be forcibly and violently coerced into submission over the tiniest of nonviolent and inconsequential infractions — but, whether or not we’re inclined to admit as much, that summarizes our current situation in the eyes of an overbearing state and its criminalization of, in essence, daily life.

How this police state cinched a noose-like grip on the nation, at this late date, arguably matters little in deference to the urgency it must be addressed. And while solutions run the gamut from individual officer liability insurance to the use of body cameras, forcing an on-call policy akin to that of fire departments to an overhaul of training policies, as it becomes apparent nothing will be done, the larger aforementioned existential question must come into play.

Are police a necessary element in an ordered, peaceful society?

In short, the answer is no — absolutely not — largely because police spend such little time policing anything other than ridiculous laws created solely for the purpose of revenue generation to justify their own existence.

Graeber writes:

“The police spend very little of their time dealing with violent criminals — indeed, police sociologists report that only about 10% of the average police officer’s time is devoted to criminal matters of any kind. Most of the remaining 90% is spent dealing with infractions of various administrative codes and regulations: all those rules about how and where one can eat, drink, smoke, sell, sit, walk, and drive. If two people punch each other, or even draw a knife on each other, police are unlikely to get involved. Drive down the street in a car without license plates, on the other hand, and the authorities will show up instantly, threatening all sorts of dire consequences if you don’t do exactly what they tell you.

“The police, then, are essentially just bureaucrats with weapons. Their main role in society is to bring the threat of physical force — even, death — into situations where it never would have been otherwise invoked, such as the enforcement of civic ordinances about the sale of untaxed cigarettes.”

READ MORE:  2 Years Since Cops Killed Eric Garner — Only Person Punished So Far is the Man Who Filmed It

This overcriminalization of, well, living, has exploded prison populations and adversarial policing to a profoundly negative effect. In the beginning of 2015, the number of federal criminal laws exceeded 4,500 — over 27,000 pages of United States federal code — with Congress creating crimes where none previously existed at a rate of 50 new criminal laws each year. And that only covers federal law — add state and local criminal codes and it’s estimated the average American unknowingly commits three felonies every day.

According to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, “our nation’s addiction to criminalization backlogs our judiciary, overflows our prisons, and forces innocent individuals to plead guilty not because they actually are, but because exercising their constitutional right to a trial is prohibitively expensive and too much of a risk.”

These purported crimes, however, largely have nothing at all to do with true harm committed against another — though brutal responses by police and filled-beyond-capacity prisons would have you thinking otherwise. With just 5 percent of the world’s population, the U.S. incarcerates no less than 25 percent of the world’s prisoners. This stunning surplus of criminal law, coupled with the government’s military equipment giveaway to law enforcement departments which have little need for it, has put the populace in the altogether dangerous position of being 58 times more likely to be killed by an officer of the law than by a terrorist.

Once an individual has a criminal record, possible future interactions with police become a risky endeavor, indeed — it already doesn’t take evidence of wrongdoing to put an officer on guard, but a criminal blip on someone’s record during an otherwise routine traffic stop creates wholly unnecessary tension where none should exist. Especially if that crime was collecting rainwater, living off-grid, keeping rabbits in the backyard, or any of the untold number of patently absurd behaviors now deemed verboten by the state — and the scope of this article won’t even touch on the untold tragedies fueled by the failed war on drugs.

Loosely in line with the law of the instrument, citizens have become opportunities for revenue generation, as police patrol the streets searching for anyone stepping out of line with some misbegotten code. We are little more than adversarial dollar signs to these roving bands of armed enforcers of extraneous laws — targets to be plundered and pillaged, harassed and shaken down, to generate revenue and therefore justify the continuation of Big Government.

In the absence of policing, justice, prison, and criminal code reform, several viable options present themselves for consideration — perhaps most imperatively among them, the complete abolishment of police.

To posit the populace would devolve into chaos and violence without police departments ignores the chaos and violence wrought by police — not to mention the very real historical proof a correctly and fully-functioning society can and will police itself.

First, consider the sizable financial feedback loop perpetuated by an excessively intrusive nanny state and its armed agents of enforcement. Taxpayers shoulder the cost of disproportionately large police forces, which crack down on petty criminals instead of preventing murders, rapes, and significant property crimes. Then taxpayers fund overburdened public defenders and backlogged courts, prisons, probation officers, and legislators in their effort to criminalize yet more ridiculously innocuous behaviors. It’s neverending. It’s unsustainable. And it’s not going to fix itself — not in ways significant enough to warrant further discussion.

READ MORE:  SHOCKING VIDEO: Sadistic Cop Repeatedly Uses Stun Gun on Unresponsive Handcuffed Man

As of 2011, according to a 2013 study by the associate dean of Eastern Kentucky University’s School of Justice Studies, Victor E. Kappeler, a mere two of 14 arrests were for violent or property crimes. If police truly existed to fight actual crime, not the overwhelmingly excessive number of ‘crimes’ created by lawmakers, departments would be slashed in staff dramatically.

Kappeler writes:

“If we take all the violent crimes reported to the police in 2011, we find that there were 1,203,564 violent crimes (FBI, 2012). Since more than 885,000 people worked as sworn officers in that same year (BJS 2012), there were 1.36 violent crimes reported for every police officer employed in the U.S. If crime were dispersed evenly across the nation’s police, then this would mean that in 2011 each police officer would have been responsible for investigating just over a single violent crime. And since we know that a relatively small number of criminals are responsible for the vast majority of crime in a society, each cop would be responsible for even fewer criminals.”

After the hotly controversial deaths by police of Michael Brown and Eric Garner in 2014, the call for police reform intensified exponentially. While undoubtedly well-intentioned in motive, years of begging nicely for the broken system to fix itself have, as to be expected, fallen on deaf ears.

Abolishing police entirely might reek of radicalism to a nation cowed by constant government fear propaganda, but considering how little violence is present in our current society — compared to just decades ago — examples already in place prove the concept has teeth.

Trained and unarmed intervention teams consisting of civilians — often former violent offenders, themselves — can and do defuse potentially violent conflicts in their own neighborhoods in major cities from Los Angeles to Detroit, as noted by Rolling Stone. Indeed, conflict resolution as a community program has effectively prevented criminal activity, improved neighborhood relations, reduced gang violence, and resolved — without the involvement of police or courts — crimes which have already occurred.

Ethan Ucker, cofounder of Circles & Ciphers — “a leadership training a conflict resolution program for young men who’ve been in prison, jail, or a gang,” which began in Chicago — facilitates “peace circles.” Though ‘peace circles’ will likely evoke images of stoned hippies around a campfire for many, the concept has done the extraordinary in a community once awash in violence and gang activity.

In just one anecdotal example Ucker offered to the Chicago Reader recently,

“There was a robbery at this store in the community. One of the people at the store whose stuff was taken said, ‘Look, I don’t want to call the cops. Is there anything we can do?’ … They found on Facebook that this young person was selling their stuff, and that young person happened to go to a school where we’d done some circles, so I knew a teacher at the school and could say, ‘Hey, this is where we’re at.’”

Eventually, robber and robbed were brought together in an attempt to resolve the wrongdoing.

“That young person ended up returning what he had that hadn’t been sold, and then working at the shop in restitution for everything else. Then it turned out he really liked working there, and after this agreement was over, he continued to go there and volunteer. There was a relationship built there.”

READ MORE:  Strip Searches, Brutality, and Violent Arrests, Proves Which Side the Government Has Taken on DAPL

That relationship among community members can act as a compelling deterrent against crime — the better one knows a neighbor, the less likely they are to rob or victimize them. This cannot be said of police in 2017, as officers often don’t live in the neighborhoods they police, which creates a degree of separation and personal investment from the ultimate outcome of any interaction — decreasing the hesitation to act violently in an encounter that wouldn’t ordinarily call for the use of force.

In some manifestations, this community solution subverting the need to involve police and the court system is termed ‘reparative or transformative justice’ — about which José Martín writes for Rolling Stone has appeared in cities across the U.S., like “Philadelphia’s experiment with community courts, spaces are created where accountability is understood as a community issue and the entire community, along with the so-called perpetrator and the victim of a given offense, try to restore and even transform everyone in the process.”

Putting the community back in community policing while abolishing police as armed agents for revenue generation can effect sweeping changes to an increasingly polarized and distanced society. Rather than the financial feedback loop apparent in our [in] justice system presently, defunding police loosens taxpayer dollars to reinstate mental health and addiction programs — two conditions of which often drive actual violent crime — among many other effective solutions.

When our rights have been pawned away by a money-hungry system, the only means left to reclaim those rights stands in wresting excessive power from those who would misuse and abuse it, in often brutal ways.

Police aren’t serving the people who pay their salaries — and are under no obligation to do so — but if they aren’t solving crimes or protecting the citizenry, whose purposes do they serve?

As Graeber, writing after the Department of Justice published a scathing report on systemic racism and excessive fines as pattern and practice in Ferguson, Missouri, continues, “in recent decades, local governments have become deeply indebted to large, private financial institutions — many of the same ones that brought of us the crash of 2008. (In Ferguson, for instance, the amount of revenue collected from fines corresponds almost exactly to that shelled out to service municipal debt.) Increasingly, cities find themselves in the business of arresting citizens in order to pay creditors.”

Ferguson is, of course, far from an isolated example. One wonders if those who unfalteringly defend the violent police state would as adamantly stand behind them if police were more accurately portrayed as state-sponsored, armed thugs for Big Banks and corporate America.

Notice none of these arguments for abolishing police criticize officers as individuals — except for an obviously growing number of bad apples, many officers chose policing as an occupation with protecting and serving in mind. But that arguably laudable goal is a vapid remnant of what has become policing for profit at the expense of communities nationwide. And unless an altogether unlikely revamping of over-criminalization takes place soon, officers serve no one but state and corporate interests — thus those who argue police put their lives on the line miss that they do so at the behest of the system oppressing us all to meet its financial goals.

No perfect solution for police violence exists, and in the absence of wholesale reform, abolishing American police might be our only realistic and suitable solution.

Timeline of the Great Fraud

November 23rd, 2017 by

https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2016/05/judge-anna-timeline-of-great-fraud_31.html

Olddogs Comments

I have posted this article in the past, but it is such a great source of info for new readers I am posting it again.

HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO ALL

Olddog

Judge Anna Von Reitz

 The People  need  to  end  the  two  party  Corporate  Fascist  political  fraud  and  the  Congress  “In  Trust”  system 

  1. 1754-1776: The “United Colonies” take shape as a loose political association, and the First and Second Continental Congresses are the result.
  2. 1776: The Colonies declare independence.
  3. 1781: The Articles of Confederation bind “States” — political subdivisions of the United Colonies -– together in a “perpetual union”, creating a confederation of States to operate in the international Jurisdiction of the Sea. [Why a “confederation” instead of a “federation”? – Because the original States gave up some of their natural jurisdiction to the new political entity, the Union, they created.]
  4. 1783: The Treaty of Paris and Treaty of Versailles cements this arrangement splitting the land and sea jurisdictions between the States and the Federal Union and places King George III as Trustee of American interests on the “High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways” —which means he kept control of American international commerce. The new “Union” entity operating in the international Jurisdiction of the sea was always controlled by the British and it has always been the British Monarch’s responsibility as International Trustee to manage it and guarantee its proper operation. It has instead run amok for 150 years.
  5. 1787: The Supreme Perfected Republican Declaration of the United Colonies creates the National Trust owed the Continental United States.
  6. 1789: Two years later, “The Constitution for the united States of America” splits off the sea jurisdiction and creates the new Federal United States. A year later (1790) the Federal United States forms a commercial company doing business as the United States (Commercial Company) to provide the nineteen enumerated services agreed to by the subscribing States.
  7. 1812-1814: The British try to horn in again and are beaten back. This skirmish results in the Treaty of Ghent, where the British interests in American shipping and commerce are reaffirmed and lasting peace is promised in return.
  8. 1845: The British Monarch and Pope secretly agree to undermine the American System of government via the Treaty of Verona. The British Monarch breaches the Treaty of Ghent and both the Pope and the King secretly breach their trust as International Trustees. They set out on a covert action and issued Letters of Marque and Reprisal to the members of the Bar Associations, allowing them to act as Foreign Agents on American soil and as privateers free to plunder American commerce.
  9. 1860: Thanks to the efforts of the Bar Associations a member of the Bar, Abraham Lincoln, is elected to serve as President. Note that he is ineligible serve as President of the United States of America, by the Titles of Nobility Amendment to the actual Constitution— but is eligible to serve as President of the United States (Commercial Company). This is the same situation we have with Barack Obama who is ineligible to serve as President of the United States of America, but is able to serve as President of the United States (Incorporated).
  10. 1861: The Civil War begins. ‘Congress’ adjourns for lack of quorum and without a date to reconvene. Lincoln organizes a Delaware Corporation and the remaining members of Congress begin functioning as a Board of Directors.
  11. 1862: The “Corporate Congress”—a body of men no different than the Board of Directors of IBM, change the meaning of a single word —only and explicitly for use within their corporation. That word is “person”. From then on the word “person” is deemed to mean “corporation” for federal government purposes. (37th “Congress”– Second Session, Chapter 49, Section 68.)
  12. 1863: Lincoln signs the Lieber Code as Commander in Chief and puts the Union Army, the Grand Army of the Republic, in charge of the nation’s future and money supply. A day later, he bankrupts the original United States (Commercial Company).
  13. 1865: Lee’s Army surrenders to Grant and a general armistice is declared. The Southern States are in ruins and under military occupation by the Union. The original Northern States are bankrupt. Foreign banks are in control of the new “United States of America, Inc.” and the Union Army reigns supreme. Over the next two years President Andrew Johnson will three times publicly declare peace on the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States, but peace is never declared in the international Jurisdiction of the Sea controlled by the Federal United States under the trusteeship of the British Monarch.
  14. 1868: The Corporate Congress writes itself a new Corporate Constitution, called “the Constitution of the United States of America” and palms off this look-alike, sound-alike private corporate document “as if” it were the actual Constitution. This is fraud on many levels. The Constitution of the United States of America purposefully sought to confuse and delude people into thinking it was the actual Equity Contract obligating the States to receive services and subrogate their international jurisdiction to the federal government.
  15. 1871: The Corporate Congress begins to set up shop for itself by creating a separate government for the District of Columbia. The initial effort fails but seven years later the Washing ton DC Municipality is created as an independent international city state run as a plenary oligarchy by the members of “Congress”. Also in 1871, the Corporate Congress claimed to own all United States corporations – 41st “Congress”- Third Session, Chapters 62, 63, 64, and 65.
  16. 1874-1885: All the actual States on the land are reorganized and at the same time completely new “Federal States” are created and new “State Constitutions” are written for them. The original States on the land are renamed in this process. The original State of Ohio operating the land jurisdiction became the Ohio State, while the usurping “Federal State”— merely a corporate franchise of the United States of America, Inc. operating in the international Jurisdiction of the Sea—took over the name “State of Ohio”.
  17. 1900-1904: Still lusting after more power for itself, the Corporate Congress set up a second shop for itself and obtained permission to do it from the Supreme Court in a series of cases known as The Insular Tariff Cases. As with setting up the Washington DC Municipality as a foreign city-state on our shores and running it as their own little oligarchy, the “Congress” now took the “federal territories and possessions” and made a new “union” of “American states” – Puerto Rico, Guam, et alia -and began calling it “the United States of America (Minor)”. They just forgot to add the (Minor) part of the name from then on, and let people assume that all the repugnant laws they passed governing this “Constitutional Democracy” also applied to the Continental United States.
  18. 1912-1913: A private association of European and American banks calling themselves “The Federal Reserve” bought the governmental services corporation known as “The United States of America, Inc.” and its “State” franchises as a business venture, and began operating such familiar agencies as The United States Department of Agriculture and The United States Department of Transportation as private, for-profit businesses -without telling anyone. They exercised the “government powers” they didn’t really possess in a vast fraud scheme in collusion with members of “Congress” to institute a fiat monetary system and misused their position of trust to put competitors out of business, set up monopolies, rig commodity markets, and commit other acts of blatant self-interested criminality and fraud.
  19. 1917: Engaging in a war for profit, Congress and their Banker Bosses passed the War Powers Act and the Trading With the Enemy Act, and numerous other illegal and repugnant “Acts” pertaining only to the Federal United States and the international Jurisdiction of the Sea, but presented them to the public as if this claptrap pertained to the actual States and People on the land of the Continental United States. Deceived by this venal and purposeful fraud, millions of Americans complied with what they believed to be the “Law” passed by a legitimate Congress acting as deputies of the States and the People.
  20. 1918-1933: Once in control of the monetary system the “Federal Reserve” increased the monetary supply exponentially, causing the “Roaring Twenties”. They built the house of cards and on October 29, 1929, they collapsed it – deliberately. This enabled them to put thousands of competitors out of business, allowed them to buy commodities, land, and labor for dirt cheap, and to manipulate the value of the dollar to their benefit.
  21. 1933-1940: The banks took full advantage of the “national emergency” they created and the Congress did everything the bankers required: The Sheppard-Towner Act, the Buck Act, the Alien Registration Act, the Social Security Act(s), the Emergency Banking Act, and more. The purpose of all this was to lay claim to the labor and the assets of the States and People of the Continental United States by securing “private contracts” with them, enabling the perpetrators to “represent them” and to set up corporations “in their names”. Hundreds of millions of Americans were told that they “had to” sign up for Social Security and have a Social Security Number in order to have a job, that it was “the Law” and that “Congress had passed it” and so, believing it to be a lawful government mandate – when in fact it was a corporate fraud scheme – they were subscribed en mass. Remembering now the actions of the Corporate Congress in 1862 redefining the word “person” to mean “corporation” for federal purposes, and their later claim made in 1871 to hold ownership interest in all United States corporations and seeing that their actions from 1933 to 1940 resulted in redefining the estates of living Americans as public trusts—that is, as a form of corporation— you can see that the “Corporate Congress” has claimed to own living Americans as assets belonging to their corporation and has also claimed to control and own their private assets — in flagrant violation of the Geneva Convention Protocols Volume II, Article 3, and in equally flagrant violation of the 1926 International Conventions on Slavery, and in violation of every lawful and moral duty, commercial contract, and trust indenture owed to the Continental United States and the American People. It is also apparent that all of this – every claim, every salvage lien, every title to land and property held under color of law – being held against the Continental United States and the living civilian inhabitants of the Continental United States, is pure, self-interested commercial fraud created and perpetuated under conditions of semantic deceit, constructive fraud, misrepresentation, and mischaracterization by the management of the Federal United States, the various governmental services corporations doing business as some form of “United States” and the British Government.
  22. 1940-present: Among the first actions to be taken by the criminals was to “register” all live births. This established a claim of ownership on the baby and his or her estate, benefiting the “State of Ohio” or other “Federal State franchise”. This act of identity theft exercised via an undisclosed and forced contract with the Mother of the child, allowed each ”State” franchise to control the name and the property of the baby. The perpetrators promptly set up new “State franchises” benefiting themselves using names styled like this: “Joseph Quincy Public” and new “Municipal franchises” set up under the auspices of the Washington DC Municipality using NAMES styled like this: “JOHN QUINCY PUBLIC”. The only purpose for creating these franchises structured as various kinds of trusts – was to act as a means for the privately owned governmental services corporations to hypothecate debt against the labor of the living people and their private property assets and to exercise control over them amounting to slavery.

http://annavonreitz.com/public-order-blank-1.pdf

Here Are the Rats Responsible for the Foreclosures ! Dinner Time!

November 22nd, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/here-are-rats-responsible-for.html

By Anna Von Reitz

It appears to most of you that you have a mortgage with a bank and that the bank has a “loan servicer” working as a subcontractor to collect and administer the terms of the mortgage.   These loan servicers often have names that imply this role, but in fact, that isn’t really their role at all.

They’ve bought your Promissory Note from the bank after the bank already discharged it once and got payment from trading your assets through the DTC—-and now the bank has sold the same Promissory Note to the “loan servicing company” and they are pretending that they have an additional interest in your collateral.  

Try to picture this—- you write a check, someone cashes it, and then the bank sells your cancelled, already cashed check to a Third Party, who comes to collect an equal amount from you again—-even though you don’t know these people from Adam, don’t have a contract with them, and never gave them any interest in your credit or collateral at all.  

All those of you who are currently in some foreclosure proceedings take a look at the back of the Promissory Note the vermin are presenting and expecting you to pay off?   What does it say on the back?   Why, some bank officer signed off on it, endorsed it (just like endorsing a check) “without recourse”.  

That means the bank has no further recourse and can’t cash it again, but they’ve happily sold it on to some other suckers who are now intent on alleging that they have a new, separate contract with you, and that you are obligated to pay them under unknown and unstated terms. 

So the bank advertised a “loan” and gave you a future lease re-purchase agreement instead, which is false advertising and fraud on the face of it, then they set up the ACCOUNT in the name of a municipal government FRANCHISE named after you without your knowledge or consent, which is unlawful conversion, then they got immediate recoupment of up to 21X the amount of the purported “loan” via selling your collateral off— a process that included cashing out your purloined Promissory Note — and then, to top it off, they re-sold your already-paid Promissory Note to Third Parties. 

Huh?

How is it that these Third Parties are being allowed to cash what amounts to  a cancelled check and also being allowed to claim that they have a contract with you guaranteeing such double-dipping? 

Answer: more undisclosed and unconscionable contracting processes brought to you by MERS, DTC/DTCC, Bank of New York Mellon, and First American Title (ALTA).

Chances are that you were never aware that your signature has Actual Cash Value.  Nobody disclosed that to you, did they?  Well, it does. 

Chances are that you were told you were being given a loan “in the normal course of business” meaning that you would be borrowing assets from the bank and paying them back.  

That isn’t what happened.  

The bank seized upon your signature and sold it as collateral to third party investors who returned 3X to 7X the entire mortgage amount to the bank.  

The bank then wrote a check to YOU — a municipal franchise corporation named after you—- and pocketed the rest.  They also charged YOU interest and got a security interest in YOUR property for nothing at all. 

Well, how’s a “dead” man going to do anything about it?   After all, they snicker, they aren’t bilking live people.  They are plundering “abandoned” public trust accounts (JOHN MICHAEL DOE) and public utility companies (JOHN M. DOE) and the “government” is letting them do it, because the government is getting a piece of the action.  

Those investors who bought (they think) your signature then turned around and used it like a rubber-stamp, counterfeiting it on everything you can think of—- other mortgages, new car loans, you name it.  Your good name has been whored-out and counterfeited all over the world. 

These four entities— MERS, DTC/DTCC, Bank of New York Mellon, and First American Title (ALTA) expedited and controlled and caused and promoted all of it.

What do you say we seize their charters?  Nationalize all their assets and accounts along with all the assets and accounts of the colluding banks and corporations that have benefited themselves from these crimes?  

For the Notice of the Crimes of the Banks &: of the Courts:

:Date: 01/12/2017:  :Time: 18:00 Hours:Place: Rockport, New Hampshire…..

:Dear Mr. Trump:

:THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE seized-upon my Given-Name when I was a baby in my cradle and the partner of  the crime: THE WISCONSIN STATE BOARD OF HEALTH made a false-public-registration-record-claim that I am a United States Citizen and also claim that I am ward of a federal-franchise-corporation doing business as a State-of-State.  They put what appears to be my name on federal-franchises including trusts and transmitting-utilities named-after me without my knowledge or consent:

:The indemnity-receipt (Birth Certificate) THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE guarantees is issued by:THE WISCONSIN STATE BOARD OF HEALTH which

makes me the Subrogee and the Priority Creditor of these federal-corporation-franchises they created and NAMED-after me: 

:The banks operate as crime-syndicates on our shores.  They engage in the plunder of these public trusts via the use of the false-contract-processes. THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and the US ARMY are responsible for oversight of the Courts-of-the-Military-Districts.The Courts-of-the-Military-Districts are in-Dishonor. 

:The banks cash-in and sell already-paid-off:Promissory Notes.  The banks convert private-property in-to public-trust-property without full Closure.  I inform you that

THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE does nothing. The People of the states of the Union suffer Grand-Felony-Level-Theft. 

:Other corporations expedite this plunder of the public-trusts and of the

transmitting-utilities with the NAMES/Names in the forms: JOHN QUINCY PUBLIC;&: JOHN Q. PUBLIC:&: John Quincy Public:&: John Q. Public. 

:Guilty-corporations are: MERS: DTC/DTCC: Bank of New York Mellon: &:

First American Title (ALTA).  Seize-control of the MERS and of the DTC/DTCC and of the Bank of New York Mellon and of the First American Title (ALTA) assets and of the records NOW. Stop foreclosure-fraud. 

: As a life-long Wisconsinite & as a private Person I object to this deceit and this piracy on our shores.  I insist that these banks and these STATE-OF-STATE/State-of-State courts be brought to heel. It is mandatory that the Americans no longer be false-conscripted and placed in-to this position. 

:You, Sir, are the Commander-in-Chief responsible for this circumstance.  Please kick the US ARMY and the U.S. Army and the United States Army and THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and The Department of Defense  in the butt and in the pocketbook.

:We bring these BIRTH-CERTIFICATES as evidence and we bring Certificates of 

the Assumed Name(s) established by American Common Law = Indemnity Receipt and Claim by the Subrogee of the Policy.  Courts must shut up and leave us alone.  Courts must dismiss false and duplicate-charges against Americans NOW.  Discharge all Promissory-Notes re-leased without re-course.  Re-claim signatures of the people for the people.  

:THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEIRS and Assigns must defend our property and our Persons/persons or THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HEIRS and Assigns must be fired for the cause of this Dereliction-of-the-Performance-Duty:Oversight of the Military-District-Courts. 

:Most-sincerely…..:

Stuff a couple million letters like this one down Trump’s smoke stack and see what you see. 

By the way, we are now reaching 70 million readers each week.  That is about one percent of the world’s population!  Pretty amazing, no?  The “Tin Hats” are proving to be the only ones who knew what was going on and their critics are proving to be the crooks responsible for all the crime and theft and misadministration. Who knew?

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com

Special Message for the FBI CIA Homeland Security DIA MI6 MI5 etc etc etc

November 21st, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/11/special-message-for-fbi-cia-homeland.html

By Anna Von Reitz

Just so everyone knows, my policy toward all “intelligence” agencies—is to let them stare up my skirt until they see Jesus.

I could care less about their snooping and eaves-dropping and telephone surveillance and email encryption hacking and all the rest of it.

I am sure that there are by now many agents from many agencies here and abroad who have been bored to tears listening to my “personal” phone calls, and still more who have gotten a real education from doing so.

So that is just all right with me. My policy is listen all you like and learn something of value to yourselves and your countries. Maybe your own conscience will be moved. Maybe you will start wondering about what really happened in 1865 and start searching for a Peace Treaty ending the Civil War…. maybe you will start wondering what a “Withholding Agent” really is…. or, maybe you will look up the history of the Postal Service and figure out that I am a party to the 2010 Postal Treaty of the Americas— an updating of all the Postal Treaties owed to the Continental United States since 1754.

And maybe that will inspire you guys to look up the actual Postal Treaties and Offices, which will lead you to figure out why there are seven (7) offices all called something like United States Postmaster….. or United States Post Master….and what is that about? Why two different spellings? Postmaster? Post Master? Hmmm….? Got any answers? Smart asses?

Maybe if you spy on me long enough the ding-dong bell in someone’s head somewhere will ring and “the government” will to figure out that, yes, Virginia, there really is a Continental United States, a Territorial United States, and a Municipal United States…. and they all have Postal Union Treaties.

Who knew? Who bothered to look? I did.

The seat of government for Americans is Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and always has been.

The Supreme Court for Americans is the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, not the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC.

Wow. Isn’t that a dilly? Kinda turns your head upside down and backwards, doesn’t it?

And it is all fact, set in stone.

Now, granted, there are still a lot of rank and file Americans who don’t know what I just told you, but then, they aren’t pretending to be intelligence agents. Most of them wouldn’t even claim to be intelligent, period.

But for you “intelligence” guys, it’s different.

You are all paid quite well and given all the bells and whistles and clearances to investigate things, so I do hold you responsible for investigating. And with all these billions spent on intelligence and security, I expect to have some—intelligence on your parts and security on mine.

In fact, this may be a big wake up call, but I expect all the highly paid government geniuses in the room to figure out who they are, where they are, who they work for, and WTH they are doing.

Today I had someone call me up and say, “Psst! Psst! There’s talk….” Yeah, the Bad People are going to “take you down” for talking to Russell-J:Gould. He’s under investigation for “Postal Treaty Treason”—–woot-woot.

Pretty hard to commit treason against yourself, isn’t it?

There are three (3) sets of postal treaties, two (2) seats of government, and all these intelligence agencies need to get some—intelligence, that is.

So get on your headsets and hunker down, boys.

The same person told me that if I get too many people on my “ship of state” the omnipresent THEY would arrest me for treason.

Well, again, these intelligence agents are just awfully lacking one key ingredient, aren’t they?

The first big announcement is that I am not subject to their government, they are subject to mine; I employ them, they don’t employ me. Go figure.

The second Red Hot News item is that my ship of state is the one pulling their shore-to-shore dinghy along in its wake. If my ship of state goes down, guess whose rubber raft is going to get sucked down to Davy Jones’ locker right along with me?

I have my own Postal Treaty and my own government, which hired THEM to provide certain essential government services (See Article IV) back in 1789, but somewhere along the road, they got stupid and mistook the Municipal Government as their employer, instead.

That’s like a moose falling in love with a horse, and they still haven’t figured out the facts of life 150 years later.

That’s intelligence…. I just don’t know what kind. Deluded? Delayed? Slower than an average glacier?

Maybe we need new questions on the Civil Service Exam?

You would think that after fifteen decades of the “innee” not fitting the “outtee” all these very intelligent government workers would get it, but no, they are still wandering around sniggering and swaggering and making threats against little old ladies and hatching entrapment schemes and trying their best to cause trouble—for their actual employers, no less.

(Is that why they think we employ them? Really?)

“I dunno, Clag,” says Clug. “What do you think, Clug?” says Clag. “I dunno. Ask Glap. Glap will know.”

Well, I certainly hope that “Glap” does know and that he gets a move on.

If there’s any treason in this house, it’s the treason of federal government employees defrauding their employers— people like me. If there is any loyalty owed that has been grossly betrayed, its the loyalty that federal government employees should owe to me—-not the other way around.

If other Americans want to come home and reclaim their stolen identity and their trust estates and man their grossly neglected but still viable ship of state, guess what? That’s their private business, not the business of any “agency” or any “agency personnel” of any bankrupt foreign governmental services corporation.

Now, here’s a bit of INTEL that you all need to know and memorize and have tattooed on the inside of your wrist for quick reference:

You can’t force citizenship on anyone nor can you alienate anyone from their nationality.

Both of those offenses are big time international war crimes and a capitol offense of the sort that involve firing squads and piano wire. Read the Geneva Conventions. Read the Hague Conventions.

Realize that you are dealing with the actual, factual government of this country when you are dealing with me.

I am your employer and the Priority Creditor of your bankrupt governmental services corporations. Both of them.

You all heard it here. Read those few sentences again. And again. And again. And again. Read it however many times it takes to sink in. This isn’t any cops-and-robbers game and I am not running for any office or building any political movement or asking permission to spit on the sidewalk,

That’s my sidewalk.

Get it? Mine. My sidewalk. I get to hop, skip, jump, run, and sit on the curb if I want to. Why? Because it’s mine. And its my ship of state, too. My heirloom. My heritage. My inheritance. It has nothing to do with you, unless and until you decide to come home, take up your lawful duty, and stop trying to hump a horse.

Research all you like. Get an ear-full. Get an eye-full.

The Truth is a threat to Liars and Evil-Doers, a light unto the cockroaches, and if you are feeling threatened by a Great-Grandma because she is telling you the truth about your own country’s history and the way your own government is set up, it’s time for you to question what you are doing and who you are doing it for.

There’s no job on Earth worth betraying your own country and your own people. Grow some Christmas ornaments and come home.

See this article and over 700 others on Anna’s website here:

http://www.annavonreitz.com


SEO Powered By SEOPressor