Log in



Categories » ‘ATTORNEYS’

Let’s Settle This Hash……

April 29th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/lets-settle-this-hash.html

de jure governmentBy Anna Von Reitz

The de jure government of this country is called The United States of America (Unincorporated). It has to be unincorporated to serve as a sovereign government, because if it held a corporate charter granted by some other government, it would be subservient to that government.
Okay? Everyone got that?

During the so-called American Civil War the rats in Congress created a doppleganger entity incorporated in Britain called “The United States of America, Inc.”.
This is called “The United States of America” but it is not your de jure government. It is just a corporation granted a charter like any other British corporation.

Now we have Keith Livingway running around claiming that he basically went to a bankruptcy trustee sale and “bought” the office of “Postmaster General” out of a claim on abandonment.
He is telling everyone that this abandoned office is the land jurisdiction trustee office once held by Benjamin Franklin and that it is the land jurisdiction de jure government that he is representing.

But here’s the kicker—- Franklin held the office of Post Master (land) not Postmaster (sea) —- and on top of that, none of these quasi-military offices like “Lieutenant Governor” and “Attorney General” and “Postmaster General” even existed prior to the Civil War.

Therefore— is Keith Livingway filling Franklin’s vacated office?
No.
He is claiming to own an office in a defunct British corporation that was bankrupted in 1907—- The United States of America, Inc. He is not occupying Franklin’s [land] office which was as a “Post Master” –two words, notice? And not a “Postmaster” and not a “General” anything.
The de jure government of this country has never been incorporated and never can be incorporated. Period!

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

de jure government

Trojan Horse Alert!

April 28th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/trojan-horse-alert.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm

_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+

%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++

Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

Trojan HorseBy Anna Von Reitz

Trojan Horse
Everybody— listen up! You need to back out of this General Post Office giddy up and do not support their “Continental Army” — it is a Trojan Horse operation.

The claims made by Keith Livingway that he bought the office of the United States Postmaster General — basically at an estate sale— should make you roll your eyes. That would be like me claiming to be a German Princess a hundred years after the German Monarchy died. Offices have no meaning and neither do titles once the organizations giving rise to them are defunct.
The “office” he claims to hold was created by The United States of America, (Incorporated) which went bankrupt in 1907.
Get a clue, here, gentlemen—- no incorporated entity is enabled to function as a sovereign government.

That “thing” was no more your government than the “thing” sitting in Washington, DC now.
They are both nothing but private, mostly foreign-owned, for-profit “governmental services corporations” that have used deceptively similar names to promote fraud.

So when Keith says he is the “Postmaster General of the United States” and he refers to “The United States of America” you now know that it is a bogus claim and that that is not The United States of America referenced in our founding documents.
The United States of America referenced in our founding documents was and is an unincorporated business entity owned and operated by the states and ultimately by the people of this country. Got that? Unincorporated.
The actual office of the United States Post Master (land jurisdiction) is a completely different office from any “Postmaster” (sea jurisdiction). See the difference? Post Master — two separate words in Upper and Lower case versus “Postmaster” — one word run together?

Here’s another clue that Keith is bogus.

No office of “Postmaster General” existed anywhere at all until after the Civil War when all this fraud began. Neither did we have any “Attorney Generals” or “Lieutenant Governors” or any of the other quasi-military offices and lingo.
That is all part of the fraud.

Now the same two crime syndicates that brought us the so-called “American Civil War”—- which was never declared and never ended with a peace treaty, and which is therefore revealed to be nothing but a stinking illegal private commercial mercenary fight on our shores—- think that they will cause trouble here again.

They got us to fight each other once for their benefit and they think they will do it again. Are we dumb enough for that?
They want a war because it profits them.

They have taken out million and multi-million dollar life insurance policies on every American. They get to collect on those for every one of us killed. And they are hard up for cash.
Hello?

Just like a guy who takes out a life insurance policy on his wife, kills her, gets the money, and runs off with his mistress. Same crappola.

Not only that, but they get to avoid paying their debts to their Priority Creditors once they are dead— and guess who their Priority Creditors are? That’s right. You and me.

They did the same thing to the Jews in Germany. The Jews were the Priority Creditors of Hitler’s government.
And then, once we are dead, they get to come in and confiscate all our property— our homes, businesses, all our personal effects— as “abandoned property”. That is their favorite excuse for their larceny.

That’s what they tried to pass off in the Philippines— that the actual unincorporated government of the actual United States (not the Territorial United States, not the Municipal United States, not the corporations) no longer exists, and that all the land and gold and other assets belonging to the American states and people are up for grabs.
Finally, the whipped cream on top of the shit pile— they get to charge everyone who is left alive for the “service” of killing us.
Have you all got the picture now?

The way to “fight” these vermin is by exposing them and their aims, not by going along with their plan and giving them an excuse to start any armed fight on our soil.
This is a bunch of criminals and it is a criminal matter— not a political one.
Spread the word. Let everyone that you know in active duty military or retired military know what is going on here— and otherwise give them no excuse to use violence. None.
Wise as serpents. Gentle as doves.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Trojan Horse

This Lawsuit Could Shatter ALL Federal Gun Control Laws

April 26th, 2017 by

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/04/no_author/end-federal-gun-control-laws/

By Bob Owens
Bearing Arms

The federal trial of a Kansas man for manufacturing and selling  firearms and silencers without a federal license could very well turn out to be the pivotal case that not only challenges the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934, but also every federal firearms law ever passed in a battle that will determine whether it is the states or the federal government that has the constitutional right to pass gun laws.

Put bluntly, this could be huge.

When Shane Cox began selling his homemade firearms and silencers out of his military surplus store, he stamped “Made in Kansas” on them to assure buyers that a Kansas law would prevent federal prosecution of anyone owning firearms made, sold and kept in the state.

The 45-year-old Chanute resident also handed out copies to customers of the Second Amendment Protection Act passed in 2013 by the Kansas Legislature and signed by Gov. Sam Brownback, and even collected sales taxes. His biggest selling item was unregistered gun silencers that were flying out of the shop as fast as Cox could make them, prosecutors said later. One of those customers – 28-year-old Jeremy Kettler of Chanute – was so enthusiastic about the silencer that he posted a video on Facebook.

Current Prices on popular forms of Silver Bullion

But last week a jury found Cox guilty of violating federal law for the manufacture, sale and possession of unregistered firearms and silencers. Kettler was found guilty on one count for possessing the unregistered silencer.

Thank God I Had a Gun:… Chris Bird

The case could reverberate across the country because it cites the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, pitting the federal government’s right to regulate firearms against the rights of states. The judge overseeing the case expects it ultimately to end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

At trial, defense attorneys contended their clients believed the Kansas law made their activities legal, arguing they are “caught in the crossfire” of the struggle between the state and the federal government over gun control.

Cox and Kettler were convicted under the National Firearms Act, which is a part of the Internal Revenue code enacted under Congress’ power to levy taxes. The case raises the question of whether that taxing authority can be used to regulate firearms that stay within state borders. Advocates for state’s rights also contend such guns do not fall under Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce.

After a decades-long wait, we finally appear to have a case that is likely to see the United States Supreme Court have to directly examine whether the Founding Fathers meant what they said when they wrote amendments to a federal Constitution that was designed to tightly bind and constrict the reach of the federal government.

What most 21st Century Americans simply do not grasp is that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were not written to to give rights to the citizens of our then-new nation, but was instead written to tightly constrain the federal government.

Deadly Force – Underst… Massad Ayoob

The Founders had just won a long and brutal war against a far-away foreign government, and the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were locked in a power struggle on just how much power the federal government in a swamp on the Potomac River would be allowed to have. The Federalists were concerned that the federal government would be anemic and far too weak to be of any use at all, while the Anti-Federalists wanted the power to remain where they felt it belonged, with the states, so that the people in each state could determine what is best for that state’s citizens.

The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to placate the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, and was mean to be ten strong chains binding down the then-puny federal leviathan to prevent future abuses.

The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights was written by Founding Fathers who understood the right to bear arms as a natural human right that the Creator bestowed upon each and every human being. How can there be any other right, if the right to defend your life is not the most paramount right of them all?

They almost felt it silly to have to codify a natural right that was so obviously self-evident to them, but knowing that a federal government unchained is a federal government tyrannical, they ratified the basic human right to bear arms within the Second Amendment.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Get it through your heads demorats, governments do not give us preexisting rights, they only try to take them away.

GUN CONTROL

The post-war Jefferson Davis: The famous trial that never was

April 24th, 2017 by

http://southernheritage411.com/truehistory.php?th=065

 

By Bill Ward

When the War Between the States ended, the victorious Northerners viewed Jefferson Davis, as the former President of the Confederate States of America, much differently than others who had served the Confederacy.

For example, when Robert E. Lee surrendered to U.S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, the meeting between the two generals was amicable. Lee was received and treated with courtesy as a senior officer. The terms were so apparently lenient, with Grant conceding to Lee’s requests on behalf of his soldiers, the surrender was referred to as “a gentleman’s agreement.”

However, even after signing a loyalty oath, Lee and other former Confederate Army officers and members of the CSA government were later disenfranchised and treated as second-class citizens. But in the eyes of the northern public, Jefferson Davis was set apart for still a different kind of treatment.

On May 10, 1865, about a mile from the town of Irwinville, Georgia, Federal troops captured Davis. With his arrest on that spring morning, his government ceased to exist. His wife, Varina, and their children were sent to Savannah, where she was kept under virtual house arrest and forbidden to leave the city. Because the soldiers, carpetbaggers and Union supporters treated the Davis children so badly, Varina arranged for them to go to Canada along with her mother.

Davis had been taken back to Virginia and imprisoned in Fort Monroe, where he would stay for the next two years. At first, he was bound in leg irons. Guards watched him around the clock but were not permitted to speak to him. He was allowed no visitors; a light burned in his cell day and night; and his only reading material was a Bible. His treatment was a clear violation of the Bill of Rights.

Many Northern Congressmen and newspapers were nothing short of vicious in their public attacks of Davis. They wanted to see him tried for treason and hanged. In one article, and in one very long sentence, the New York Times referred to Davis by every insulting comment and offensive name that was fit to print. Rhetoric far outran legal reasoning.

But if Davis was in an unusual legal predicament, so was the United States government. The dilemma faced by Washington was how to handle the Davis case. The government under Lincoln had created its own major obstacles by spending four years proclaiming that secessionists were “traitors and conspirators.” The U.S. military had silenced opposition to the administration by closing down newspapers that dared challenge the party line or to make the slightest suggestion that secession might be legal. Thousands of Northerners had been jailed for exercising their First Amendment rights, and those thousands had friends with long memories in the Northern bar.

Northern lawyers were angry for having their clients locked in prison with no civil rights as guaranteed by the Constitution; having civilians tried by military courts for non-existent crimes; having a government that ignored the Supreme Court, setting itself above the constitutional plan of checks and balances. They didn’t like having to beg the president for justice for clients convicted by phony courts-martial or locked up for long periods without any trial. Under Lincoln, the U.S. government had become tyrannical, and certainly anything but a free and constitutional society.

The best lawyers of the day were willing to volunteer to defend Jefferson Davis, because they were angry at the way Lincoln’s government had trampled the Bill of Rights and the Constitution for four years. Even those who didn’t believe in secession were repulsed by the conduct of the Republican administration and the U.S. military.

Charles O’Connor of New York, one of the most famous trial lawyers of the era and a man of great stature in the legal profession, volunteered to be Davis’s counsel. Salmon P. Chase, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, would be the trial judge.

But interesting things began to happen, and the government’s dilemma became even worse. University of Virginia Law Professor, Albert Bledsoe, published a book, “Is Davis a Traitor?” Bledsoe methodically took apart the case against secession, delivering a solid blow to the prosecutors and dampening their zeal to try Davis. Prosecutors actually began to look for a way to avoid trying him without vindicating the South.

Then another method was decided on for prosecution. The attorney general would bring in outside, independent counsel, as we have seen in modern times, such as in Watergate or the Clinton scandals. The government needed someone of great standing in the legal community to be the lead prosecutor. It chose John J. Clifford. But after reviewing the case, Clifford withdrew citing “grave doubts” about the validity of the case. The government could “end up having fought a successful war, only to have it declared unlawful by a Virginia jury,” where Davis’s “crime” was alleged to have been committed.

President Johnson, Lincoln’s successor, thought the easiest way out would be to pardon Davis, as he had pardoned many other Confederates. But Davis refused, saying, “To ask for a pardon would be a confession of guilt.” He wanted a trial to have the issue of secession decided by a court of law — where it should have been decided to begin with — instead of on battlefields. Most Southerners wanted the same.

Northerners either forgot or were unaware of a great secessionist tradition in America. Southerners were not alone in their view that each state had the right to determine its own destiny in the Union. The procedure for joining the Union also applied to withdrawing from the Union.

That thought harkens back to an editorial by the Cincinnati (Ohio) Daily Inquirer, in the summer of 1861, after the “traitor” label was let loose by the North: “The Republican papers are great on treason. . . . It is treason to circulate petitions for a compromise or peaceful readjustment of our national troubles . . . to question the constitutional powers of the President to increase the standing army without authority of law . . . to object to squads of military visiting private houses, and to make search and seizures. . . to question the infallibility of the President, and treason not to concur with him. . . It is treason to talk of hard times; to say that the war might have been avoided. It is treason to be truthful and faithful to the Constitution.”

A year after John Clifford withdrew, the government appointed another special counsel, Richard Dana of Boston, who had written the novel, “Two Years Before the Mast.” But after reviewing the evidence, he agreed with Clifford; the case was a loser. Dana argued that “a conviction will settle nothing in law or national practice not now settled…as a rule of law by war.” Dana observed that the right to secede from the Union had not been settled by civilized means but by military power and the destruction of much life and property in the South. The North should accept its uncivilized victory, however dirty its hands might be, and not expose the fruits of its carnage to scrutiny by a peaceful court of law.

Now, over two years after Davis’s imprisonment and grand jury indictments for treason, the stage was set for the great public trial of the century. Davis had been released from prison on a $100,000 bond, supported by none other than Horace Greeley, the leading abolitionist writer in the North and a former Lincoln supporter. Greeley and a host of others were outraged at the treatment Davis had received, being locked up in a dungeon for more than two years with no speedy trial.

Since two famous special counsels had told the government its case was a loser, finally, none other than the Chief Justice, in a quirk of Constitutional manipulation, devised an idea to avoid a trial without vindicating the South. His amazing solution was little short of genius.

The Fourteenth Amendment had been adopted, which provided that anyone who had engaged in insurrection against the United States and had at one time taken an oath of allegiance (which Davis had done as a U.S. Senator) could not hold public office. The Bill of Rights prevents double jeopardy, so Davis, who had already been punished once by the Fourteenth Amendment in not being permitted to hold public office, couldn’t be tried and punished again for treason.

Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase secretly passed along his clever argument to Davis’s counsel, Charles O’Connor, who then made the motion to dismiss. The Court took the motion under consideration, passing the matter on to the Supreme Court for determination.

In late December 1867 while the motion was pending, President Johnson granted amnesty to everyone in the South, including Davis. But the Davis case was still on the docket. In February 1868, at a dinner party attended by the Chief Justice and a government attorney, they agreed that on the following day a motion for non-prosecution would be made that would dismiss the case. A guest overheard the conversation and reported what was on the minds of most Southerners: “I did not consider that he [Davis] was any more guilty of treason than I was, and that a trial should be insisted upon, which could properly only result in a complete vindication of our cause, and of the action of the many thousands who had fought and of the many thousands who had died for what they felt to be right.”

And so, the case of United States versus Jefferson Davis came to its end — a case that was to be the trial of the century, a great state trial, perhaps the most significant trial in the history of the nation — that never was.

Olddogs Comments!

So much for honest lawyers and politicians! When will you folks understand that people seeking office, power, or money cannot be trusted because they don’t work for us. They work for the International Investment Banking Cartel who claims to own the world. Everything you think you own really belongs to them and your taxes really amount to rent.

HANG THE BANKERS!

POLITICIANS

JIM PORTER SPEAKS FOR THE PEOPLE

April 22nd, 2017 by

jporter2327@yahoo.com

Hello to All,

Several months ago I backed away from most group discussions discussing America’s problems, as I hadn’t found a group willing to focus on America’s problem(s) truth, as evidenced by America’s history. It does no good to preach to the choir.

I believe our American written history is the key to highlighting our Creator’s intention for this great country. The history exposes the individuals writing our truths while also exposing those individuals violating America’s truths. For the most part the individuals are our congress members.

Over the last few months, America has witnessed Americans individually being jailed in the name of justice, while after several months the history exposes these individuals were simply removed from their fight to expose government corruption and name the individual government employees responsible for what is simply a violation of our law of the land by the crime of treason (a war like act of a citizen against their ‘country’; to which I want to add, a ‘country’ built to represent the People, and by the wish of the People provide the People life security.).

These arrested, individual Americans had our countries best interest at heart. This recent history shows the concept of best intention is good, but also shows we still need a perfected game plan to remove our current corrupt government employees now, so ‘We, the People’ can review America’s history and correct results of crimes committed years, even decades and centuries ago.

This message string started over a writer’s article about repeal the 16th.

America’s history clearly and easily proves the 16th is not a constitutional amendment, and not a law of the land. Ron V. makes a valid yet incomplete point defining the unconstitutional status of the 16th, but until the American People understand the truth behind the 1861 reason, the American People will never enjoy America as set forth in our federal constitution. AND HERE IS WHY!

The following is not in order of importance because everything holds equal value, so….

1) Nowhere in America’s federal constitution is ‘Power’ granted to the united States federal government.

***Can anyone reading this message tell how many Articles make up America’s federal constitutional contract of ‘We, the People’ granting power to branches of our federal government for the good of the People? (without looking it up)

***THE ANSWER IS 7 ARTICLES, AND AFTER THE CONSTITUTION RATIFICATION, ARTICLE 7 HAS NO MORE BUSINESS. Article 7 addressed the rounding, decimal point from whole number, for the number of colonies needed for constitutional ratification of transfer of power from the People to a limited federal government.

Since the article writer that started this message string is relying on this federal constitution, I feel all should know the constitution.

2) ‘Power’ (operational authority by instructions to members for the good of the People) is granted to a federal legislative branch known as congress which is organized into two branches by choice of the People, a Senate and a House of Representatives. The House was then unconstitutionally altered by the fraud of the currently known 14th amendment, and the Senate branch was altered by the fraud known as the 17th amendment. These fraudulent moves were perpetrated during the 19th century, because other frauds perpetrated during the 18th century were allowed to continue, and this bring us, the American People, to the moldy crust on the problem.

3) Article 1 grants all legislative ‘Power’ clearly states, (ratified in 1788)

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the united States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.

4) A Office of Profit is an Executive Appointment, and as this executive appoint is not from the united States, the appointment is from a foreign state.

5) The title esquire is a British executive appointment discussed and proven by the Order of Precedence of England, and this constitutional statement makes it the crime of treason for individuals known as attorney, but not lawyer, to hold government employment in any domestic government position across America to this day.

6) As no state can issue Titles of Nobility, the exclusion of People called attorneys from government employment in county, state and federal positions such as judges demanding to be addressed by the title ‘Your Honor’, and district attorneys (officers of the court) set forth in state constitutions is complete, yet not enforced.

America’s current judicial system fails the People because the People can sue People, and the government is currently suing People, but the People have no mechanism to sue the government individuals in control of the People’s government.

7) Many American People today continue to believe America’s government is just, and this is exampled by the work of the writer stating to repeal the 16th amendment. How can this unconstitutional action be repealed? To repeal an action, the action must be lawful so an unlawful action cannot be repeal. It can be thrown away, but to know this the People need to learn why the action was unlawful.

What is happening today is simply the government and non-government attorneys know that individual People screaming for repeal of unlawful action(s) are in fact stating the People don’t know lawful, or shit from shine-Ola.

The history of then future American constitutional frauds is discussed in articles which became known as the federalist papers The articles were written during the drafting of America’s federal constitutional contract to discuss what could be ratified and what needed to be added by fake amendment.

What the attorneys had going on in the Colonies during the 1760’s and 1770’s was simply a greedy power struggle between International B.A.R. members bantering for control of the colonies which translated into control of the colonist for control of the colonial wealth.

For the inquisitive mind, the International B.A.R. was and still is a syndicated crime ring of attorneys willing to enjoy what they steal from non International B.A.R. members.

8) The international B.A.R. has been around a long, long, long……..time, long before the 1750 colonial prosperity. The international association is sooooo secretive a quick search finds no result.

9) The American B.A.R. was started in 1878 which is important to know for several reason, one of which is to know the international B.A.R preceded the american B.A.R. If Lincoln was a B.A.R. member, and the A.B.A.R. was not around until after his death, he was a member of the International B.A.R., just like those wanting control of the colonies!

The colonial B.A.R. members didn’t want to share their spoils with the British attorneys, so the colonial attorneys hatched their plan to break away from their English conspirators.

The colonial attorneys devised a plan to separate the colonies from the British holding, and to do this the colonial based attorneys needed the support of the colonial People, and this required a written plan which later became our federal constitutional contract.

The attorneys started pushing back against British control, and eventually the American Revolution started in 1775 with a declaration of separation of the colonies from the British Empire. As attorneys have no heart, feelings or character they relied on the character of the colonial People. The attorneys drafted the Declaration of Independence as an international notice of separation document based upon Creator rights they planned to steal from the People later.

What the attorneys struggled with then, as they do today is simply their lack of compassion resulting in their inability to recognize human compassion. This simple weakness allows attorneys to ‘think’ what they do will not be discovered by People with compassion for their fellow human being(s).

During the drafting of America’s federal contract, the attorneys, then allowed in colonial government before the ratification of the document that prohibited them from government employment in the country they designed, discussed through articles which latter became known as the ‘Federalist Paper’s’, the different constitutional aspects of their criminal plan.

10) The most problematic issue they discussed was the unconstitutional nature of Common Law rule. (does anyone see the similarity between common law and common core?)

The federalist, which I call honest People, demanded no more bull shit from a titled individual knowing a title is not the measure of men.

The exclusion of common law from the law of the land simply made individual opinion a foreign thought. As the attorneys were forced to include the clause of no government employment because of foreign executive appointment without congressional consent, they negotiated the future of a bill of rights through the public article found in the federalist papers, to be added to our federal contract later in 1791. This article admits what was to be added later in 1791 was not constitutional and would prevent the ratification of the entire constitutional document the attorneys needed for separation from their British crime syndicate competitors.

The plan of the colonial attorney crime syndicate was simple, as the American Colonial People were busy making a living and didn’t want to deal with worldwide negotiation(s).

The attorneys took their best shot at greater colonial control by writing for ratification the federal Constitution, then after ratification of the contract, waited for the right time to make alteration/altercations to that documents while hoping their criminal plan would not be discovered, or that the attorneys would not be replaced/removed from government positions created.

This is evidenced by studying the first meeting of the federal supreme court, a week long meeting were nothing happened because the federal constitution known as the law of the land was so complete the People could administer their own problem solving courts at their local level so the federal courts were useless. By the ‘Law of the Land’ found in Article 6, the attorneys were out of control of the nation they designed and intended to rape and pillage.

The first federal supreme court meeting was convened on Feb. 2, 1790 and after a week the attorneys knew something needed to be done quick, to protect their position or their efforts would be lost. They recognized what needed to be done would also be unconstitutional, but that was of no concern to the attorneys as they consider(ed) America theirs, not the People’s.

Without going into much greater detail I’ll wind this message down by saying;

doing the right thing for the wrong reason does not work. Look at what the dumb ass attorneys did starting in the 1750, they started working to build the greatest country on earth for the wrong reason. They wanted to rape the People instead of enjoying the benefits of their work.

The attorneys stayed in American government office after they made the design unconstitutional, so they knew every single congressional action signed by a single attorney must be thrown out now once discovered. This is not to say the thought of the action is not sound, but to all seemingly sound action there is a hidden perk for the attorneys to screw over the American People.

This is very evident in the fraud of Dodd-Frank and the obama care debacle. These federal frauds, currently considered federal code, protect attorneys while screwing ordinary (none government employed) Americans. Why do you think the attorneys in our last congress returned the obama care fix without a vote? Its because to make the fix they had to remove the protection the attorneys rely on to stay in office, THAT’S WHY!

O.K., so I’m going to make another point before signing off……

The Dodd-Frank Act, known as the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection act IS NOT about finance reform, IT IS A FEDERAL CODE ALLOWING INSURANCE FRAUD TO ALLOW CRIMINALS IN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT TO STAY IN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT, and to do this the code prevents the arrest of known government criminals by current law enforcement. Dodd-Frank must be thrown out to get with throwing out obama care, and there is the problem the congress members know, but most American People do not. Even our current white house resident doesn’t know the truth, but that is because he is refusing a meeting with me for me to present the truth to him. I will show him the government documents to back up what I have written. The president is also doing the wrong thing(s) for the right reasons so nothing is happening to benefit the People.

Now I will go, but first I want to say an Article 5 convention will be the death of 

America. WHY?

The attorneys will change the part about no attorneys in government and that my friends be the end of America.

The American attorneys now have their American B.A.R. so they will not have to share with the British attorneys. As that was the original intent, the attorneys don’t need an America by the federal contract, just wait till they write a contract without giving a shit about you or me.

Jim Porter

ATTORNEYS


SEO Powered By SEOPressor