Log in



Categories » ‘Cognitive Dissonance’

In Amerika there will never be a real debate

October 25th, 2012 by

 

Institute for Political Economy

Website Improvements

We have happily transferred our website to a new host!  We hope all readers experience faster load times and improved reliability from here on. Thank you for your support!

By Paul Craig Roberts

God help them if Obama and Romney ever had to participate in a real debate about a real issue at the Oxford Union. They would be massacred.

The “debates” revealed that not only the candidates but also the entire country is completely tuned out to every real problem and dangerous development. For example, you would never know that US citizens can now be imprisoned and executed without due process. All that is required to terminate the liberty and life of an American citizen by his own government is an unaccountable decision somewhere in the executive branch.

No doubt that Americans, if they think of this at all, believe that it will only happen to terrorists who deserve it. But as no evidence or due process is required, how would we know that it only happens to terrorists? Can we really trust a government that has started wars in 7 countries on the basis of falsehoods? If the US government will lie about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in order to invade a country, why won’t it lie about who is a terrorist?

America needs a debate about how we can be made more safe by removing the Constitutional protection of due process. If the power of government is not limited by the Constitution, are we ruled by Caesar? The Founding Fathers did not think we could trust a Caesar with our safety. What has changed that we can now trust a Caesar?

If we are under such a terrorist threat that the Constitution has to be suspended or replaced by unaccountable executive action, how come all the alleged terrorist cases are sting operations organized by the FBI? In eleven years there has not been a single case in which the “terrorist” had the initiative!

In the eleven years since 9/11, acts of domestic terrorism have been miniscule if they even exist. What justifies the enormous and expensive Department of Homeland Security? Why does Homeland Security have military-equipped Special Response Teams with armored vehicles?http://www.dhs.gov/photo/hsi-using-armored-vehicles-training-ice Who are the targets of these militarized units? If eleven years of US government murder, maiming, and displacement of millions of Muslims hasn’t provoked massive acts of domestic terrorism, why is Homeland Security creating a domestic armed force of its own? Why are there no congressional hearings and no public discussion? How can a government whose budget is deep in the red afford a second military force with no defined and Constitutionally legal purpose?

What is Homeland Security’s motivation in creating a Homeland Youth? Is the new FEMA Corps a disguise for a more sinister purpose, a Hitler Youth as Internet sites suggest?https://www.dhs.gov/blog/2012/09/14/welcome-fema-corps-inaugural-class Are the massive ammunition purchases by Homeland Security related to the raising of a nationwide corps of 18- to 24-year-olds? How can so much be going on in front of our eyes with no questions asked?

Why did not Romney ask Obama why he is working to overturn the federal court’s ruling that US citizens cannot be subject to indefinite detention in violation of the US Constitution? Is it because Romney and his neoconservative advisers agree with Obama and his advisers? If so, then why is one tyrant better than another?

Why has the US constructed a network of detainment camps, for which it is hiring “internment specialists”? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0gvWkHNeQs&list=UUiqRq2mT_bBPMRhHap684Ig&index=10&feature=plcp

Why does the US Army now have a policy for “establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations”? http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r210_35.pdf

Here is Rachel Maddow’s report on how Obama criticizes the neoconservative Bush/Cheney regime for violations of the US Constitution and US statutory law and then proposes the same thing himself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8J_lcHwkvc

How did the presidential debates avoid the fact of Predator Drones flying over us here in the domestic United States of America? What is the purpose of this? Why are the smallest police forces in the most remote of locations being equipped with armored cars? I have seen them. In small lilly-white communities north of Atlanta, Georgia, communities of sub-million dollar MacMansions have militarized police with armored cars and automatic weapons. SWAT teams in full military gear are everywhere. What is it all about? These small semi-rural areas will never see a terrorist or experience a hostage situation. Yet, they are all armed to the teeth. They are so heavily armed that they could be sent into combat against the Third Reich or the Red Army.

Any such questions run afoul of the assumption of America’s moral perfection. No such debate will ever happen. But if “it is the economy, stupid,” why is there no economic debate?

Last month the Federal Reserve announced QE3. If QE1 and QE2 did not work, why does anyone, including the Federal Reserve Chairman, think that QE3 will work?

Yet, the utterly irrational financial markets, which haven’t a clue about anything, were overjoyed at QE3. This can only be because what rules the equity market is propaganda, spin, and disinformation, not facts. The vaunted stock market is incapable of making any correct decision. The decisions are made by the fools in the market operating on a short-run basis. The only safe path to take is to run with the lemmings. This strategy insures that a portfolio manager is always in the middle of his peers and, therefore, he doesn’t lose clients.

How wonderful it would have been for Obama and Romney to have confronted in a real debate how QE3, designed to help insolvent “banks too big to fail,” can help households operating, with two earners, on real incomes of 45 years ago, which is where the current real median household income stands.

How does saving a bank, designated as “too big to fail,” help the family whose jobs or main job has been exported to China or India in order to maximize corporate profits, executive performance bonuses and shareholders’ capital gains?

Obviously the working population of the US has been sacrificed to the profits of the mega-rich.

An appropriate debate question is: Why has the livelihood of working Americans been sacrificed to the profits of the mega-rich?

No such question will ever be asked in a “presidential debate.”

In the 21st century, US citizens became nonentities. They are brutalized by the police whose incomes their taxes pay. They, for protesting some injustice or for no cause at all, are beaten, arrested, tasered and even murdered. The police, paid by the public, beat up paralyzed people in wheel chairs, frame those who call them for help against criminals, taser grandmothers and small children, and shoot down in cold blood unarmed citizens who have done nothing except lose control of themselves, either through alcohol, drugs, or rage.

Brainwashed Americans pay large taxes at every level of government for protection against gratuitous violence, but what their taxes support is gratuitous violence against themselves. Every American, except for the small number of mega-rich who control Washington, can be arrested and dispossessed, both liberty and property, on the basis of nothing but an allegation of a member of the executive branch who might want the accused’s wife’s, girlfriend, property, or to settle a score, or to exterminate a rival, or to score against a high school, college, or business rival.

In America today, law serves the powerful, not justice. In effect, there is no law, and there is no justice. Only unaccountable power.

What is the point of a vote when the outcome is the same? Both candidates represent the interests of Israel, not the interests of the US. Both candidates represent the interests of the military/security complex, agribusiness, the off-shoring corporations, the suppression of unions and workers, the total demise of civil liberty and the US Constitution, which is in the way of unbridled executive power .

In the US today, the power of money rules. Nothing else is in the equation. Why vote to lend your support to the continuation of your own exploitation? Every time Americans vote it is a vote for their own obliteration.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

True to my objective, I have posted more accomplished and intelligent authors on this subject of voting in political elections, but now I’m going to fess up with my own opinion.

VOTING IS AN ADMISSION OF YOUR IGNORANCE!

In an effort to bring you up to date on how the world works, the International Banking Cartel has acquired financial power over all governments. ( “Questioning central banks about gold has never been attempted by financial market academics, analysts, and newsletter writers, nor by mainstream financial journalists because they simply take for granted that central banks operate in secret. Central banks control the value of all capital, labor, goods, and services in the world — that is, central banks exercise nearly absolute power –– but financial market academics, analysts, and newsletter writers and mainstream financial journalists seem to believe that central banks are somehow exempt from the ancient principle that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Chris Powell, Secretary

/Treasurer Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc. New Orleans Investment Conference Wednesday, October 24, 2012)

So, my dear ignorant patriots, with a little searching for information not under the control of the Bankers Main Stream Media, you will learn that the Bankers leave NOTHING to chance, and anyone running for office has been comprised, and this has been going on for longer than this generation and our ancestors. If we really want a free world, we have to eliminate
Central Banking that is under the Cartels power, and that means eliminating them. TO KILL A SNAKE, CUT OFF IT’S DAMN HEAD!

Since most of you have accepted the killing of anyone the government wants’ dead, what is wrong with adding a few hundred Banksters to the list?

“Let me issue and control a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes their law.”  Mayer Amschel Rothschild

 

VOTING

 

You Want Me To Vote For Romney?

October 23rd, 2012 by

 

 (Here s What I Ask In Return) |
        Neal's Soapbox
http://www.zombie-slayer.com/neal/?p=857

 

I keep hearing from friends and co?workers, that I HAVE to vote for Romney to stop Obama from getting elected again. They say I have to sacrifice my principles, be a realist, not an idealist, and vote for Romney to at least slow down, the damage being done to this country by Obama.

          Okay, here’s the deal. I will vote for Romney if two things occur. First, Romney reads, and swears to uphold a speech that I prepare for him, and secondly each and every Romney supporter who has nagged at me to vote for him signs a declaration, that I will also prepare for him or her.

          Here is the speech that I would ask Mr. Romney to read, and agree too:
 
          I, Willard, Mitt, and Romney do solemnly swear to uphold and defend the Constitution, against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I will not sign into law any legislation which does not have as its foundation any of the specifically enumerated powers found in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution. I will not abide a loose interpretation of the General Welfare, the Commerce, and the Necessary and Proper Clauses of the Constitution as a basis for enacting law.

          As President, I will reduce our national deficit and begin paying off the national debt by $1 trillion per year. If I fail to reduce our national debt by $4 trillion by the end of my first term, I will not run for a second term. Along those lines I will work to get a flat tax, or a federal sales tax implemented, doing away with the graduated income tax, until the national debt is brought under control. Once that occurs I will no longer allow government to tax the earnings of the people to fund our operations. This nation got along fine enough for 124 years before the Constitution was amended to allow for an income tax. If government lives within its means, there is absolutely no reason to ask the people to fund it.

          As President, I will hold the Bill of Rights as sacred and ensure that the rights of every American are protected. I will begin by dismantling the Department of Homeland Security and revoking every piece of legislation passed to fight the war on terror which in some fashion infringes upon an unalienable right of the people. I will reign in the Transportation Security Administration, (TSA), and find other ways of ensuring the public’s safety than by infringing upon their 4th Amendment right to be secure in their persons and property.

          As President, I will begin dismantling this behemoth that is the federal government by abolishing the following Cabinet Posts and their associated agencies; the Secretary of Education, Department of Labor, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agencies. These are all areas that are best managed by the individual states, and not the federal government.

          I will also recall our ambassador to the United Nations and give the member nations 30 days to recall their respective ambassadors before I schedule the UN building to be demolished.

          I will also drastically cut back our military presence overseas unless the nations where we have military installations formally request a U.S. military presence. If that were the case then that nation will be responsible for paying the entire cost to sustain that installation, including the pay and benefits of every U.S. serviceman assigned to that installation. If not, that nation can fend for itself. It is not our place to police and defend the world. With that being said, if a rogue nation decides to attack the U.S. we will retaliate with the full force of our might but we will not invade and occupy a sovereign nation so that military contractors such as Halliburton can make a fortune off the misfortune of war.

          I will revoke the charter of the Federal Reserve Bank and give the power to coin our nation’s currency back to Congress where it belongs. The treasury department is fully capable of printing all the money required to sustain our economy without America having to be enslaved to a cartel of globalist bankers who profit for our nation’s debt.

          And finally, I will enact strict trade laws which grant no benefits to any nation, or company, which produces goods outside the border of the United States. For every item we import to America, one item will be exported to that country which is manufactured in America, or all trade with that nation will grind to a halt. We will rebuild America as a manufacturing force to be reckoned with.

          These are my promises to you as president. If I fail to uphold even one of them, I will not seek re-election. I swear this under penalty of perjury, and may God and the American people hold me accountable.
 
          That is the speech that Mitt Romney MUST give before I will vote for him. Otherwise, he can take his chances without me. And for you, the faithful republicans who nagged at me to support him, your declaration is much simpler. I would ask you to read and sign the following:
 
          I _______________________, do hereby swear that I have investigated the candidate I support, to include their past voting record and stances on the issues. I have not based my decision strictly upon party loyalty, or that my candidate is the best chance to defeat the current incumbent.
          I have also read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and understand that these documents are sacredly obligatory upon the government, limiting their authority and power. I have applied them as a litmus test to the candidate I support and believe that said candidate will best uphold the principles contained in those documents.
          If, it is proven later, that the candidate I vote for fails to uphold the Constitution, or fails to uphold any of his campaign promises I, __________________, will rip my heart out of my chest and eat it.
 
Signed:   ___________________________________________
 
          There, that’s all you have to do to get me to vote for Mitt Romney. That wasn’t that hard, was it?

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

The most important thing Neal forgot was to put a limit on executive orders.

NONE would be better, and much needs be said about our Comprehensive Annual Financial Report profits being used as a rebuilding base and corporate taxation reduction. See:  http://cafr1.com/

Mitt would also have to support a real Attorney General so the $23 trillion Leo E. Wanta funds are recovered. See:  http://lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/tag/leo-wanta-official-biography-american-wanta-be-free/

Election

 

Go To The Polls and NOT VOTE!

October 21st, 2012 by

Vote For “None Of The Above”!

www.OnlyWay.com

 

By David A. McElroy

Are you sick and tired of the false choices offered at the polls? Do you refuse to vote for the “lesser of two evils”? Do you feel your voice is not heard, your vote does not count in an election system rife with corruption, intimidation, and vote fraud? Do you really want to vote for “None of the above”?
 
I recommend we go to the polls and sign in at the registration table as a voter. But in doing so, add a little note stating you refuse to participate in a system you have no confidence in. Speak for yourself. Use ink and this vote of “no confidence” in the election system will be a part of the public record. They can’t dispose of the sheets of voters’ registered signatures. Then politely explain to the election workers that you do not intend to cast a vote in a system of false choices corrupt beyond redemption. You should speak openly within earshot of other voters, but not be loud or disruptive explaining your action. Then just leave, hoping you don’t get bodily thrown out the door.
 
Rev. DeForest Soaries resigned as Chairman of the US Elections Assistance Commission, as of April 30, 2005, after being appointed by President George W. Bush. Soaries held a press conference to announce that he could not be associated with an election system that was “ripe for stealing elections and for fraud.” He characterized the election system as being a “charade” and a “travesty”. Of course, mainstream media did not broadcast or publish the videotaped statements Soaries made in his indignant resignation. Read his story on the front page of the Oct. 2006 Brad Blog. Are things any better under Obama?
 
You should recall testimony by electronics engineers that the electronic voting machines are designed to facilitate remote-control vote rigging via a perpetrator’s cell phone. They even demonstrated how this was done. See www.TomFlocco.com for Flocco’s detailed Oct. 30, 2002 expose Hacking the Presidency. Read Beverly Harris’ Black Box Voting: Tampering in the 21st Century, if you need references documenting the election frauds.
 
If enough of us register our vote of “no confidence” at the polls, the message should get through loud and clear to the electioneers and politicians. Let’s deploy this means of showing them what happens when they throw an election and nobody chooses to vote! Let’s vote against the system and register the fact that we won’t participate in the fraud! Let’s make it clear that we do not consent to be governed by either wing of the big bird of prey feeding on we the people. Reject the false promises of Dempublicans and the Repocrats and throw a monkey wrench into the turnstile of tyranny posing as democracy. Vote “no confidence” and vote “none of the above” by registering but NOT VOTING!

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

I have had a similar on going discussion with a local political columnist who advocates voting every incumbent out of office, but I cannot convince him that it’s not just the politicians, but the people who control the outcome that is the real problem. After all is said and done, the people who count the votes are the only one’s that control who wins. That is the reason all democracies have failed. On the other hand, I detest any political system that gives the majority the power to tyrannize the minority. If we had honest elections, there would be no difference in our government, as those who cannot manage their lives will always be in the majority. Only the dull and ignorant need governments to run their lives and there has never been a shortage of them in every system of government the world has tried.

Take responsibility for what is yours, protect it, have compassion for the weak, worship the Lord God, and thank Him for your abilities and abundance.

His government has always worked, try it and see for yourself! Even the dull and ignorant can remember ten laws. 

 

ELECTION

 

Multiculturalism: As A Tool To Divide And Conquer

October 18th, 2012 by

 

http://www.louisbeam.com/Multicul.htm

 

by Louis Beam

 

No nation is born multicultured. Multiculturalism is an unnatural as well as unhealthy condition that can only afflict states in national decline. A multicultural state carries in it's geneses the seeds of eventual national destruction. 

All multicultural nations will be found to be in a state of political, moral, economic and social decay. Greed and corruption will characterize the government coupled with oppressive measures directed against citizens. Lies and deceit will be stock and trade of media, politicians, and educational institutions. Such are the bellwethers of a multiculturalist advent. 

In modern times multiculturalism is instituted from the top down as an elitist ruling class tool used to play one or more racial or ethnic groups against another. The ensuing cultural melee serves the political designs, economic goals and power needs of elitist rulers and their sponsors. This technique was developed by Marxist ideologues who used multiculturalism in Russia to divide and conquer resistance to the institution of a communist state. The end result of their successful takeover was the murder of thirty million humans in the Soviet Union alone. Many more elsewhere. 

The same internationalist cabals who sponsored Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin as the multicultural leaders of the Soviet state from their banking houses in New York, similarly sponsor the multicultural leaders of the United States, Canada, and Europe today. An interlocking network of foundations such as Ford and Carnegie, international banking empires such as Rockefeller and Rothschild, and government agencies firmly in their control work in tandem with controlled propaganda outlets such as the New York Times, CBS, and Hollywood, to promote, foster, and institute multiculturalism today. While the examples used in this essay deal primarily with the United States the same process with the same methods is being employed elsewhere. This of itself is prima facie evidence of a cabal which promotes multiculturalism as a tool to achieve its objectives. 

Multiculturalism is being used as a hammer to forge the compliant people who will compose the obedient states of the New World Order. As a weapon of post modern political warfare multiculturalism has few equals, which, thus explains its use currently against all of Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Deliberate fragmentation of these nations and the resultant loss of national identity and purpose into politically disharmonious units, serves as a stepping stone to world government. And who will compose that world government? A ruling class consisting of an "economic hierarchy" that replaces the philosophy of the nineteenth century "natural hierarchy." A force that views countries and the people that live in them first as economic targets to be exploited, and second as military targets to be defeated if they resist. 

One must not let himself be confused by the window dressing of willing dupes from the left who are most often, but not always, seen as the spokesmen for the glories of multiculturalism. Liberal supporters of multiculturalism amount to nothing more than opportunist parasites riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic. While some incoherent liberals have been spokesmen for multiculturalism, they should not be viewed as representing other main stream liberals any more so than do so-called conservatives like Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich speak for constitutionalists and populists. The real stimulus, unseen elitist who promote multiculturalism as a tool of warfare, are themselves anything but liberal, progressive, or democratic. Rather they are global social tyrants who seek more power, more wealth, and more control over people–and they could care less what the politics are of those they seek to rule. 

Elitists schemers envision a dictatorial world government composed of forcibly federated states, which, properly speaking, are police states without borders. The United Nations will serve as the store house front and public face of those who from behind the scenes manipulate world events. Economically envisioned is a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Stalin did for his miserable workers. Vassal states are to produce goods and insure compliance of their subjects by defining all opposition to the borderless police state as terrorism. Thus will be the good times. In bad times, when elitist multinational corporations are unable to maintain control, the armed might of NATO will be used to enforce obedience by non-compliant states.(1)

METHODS USED AND THEIR EFFECT

Just as television commercials are run by those who will profit from their airing, multiculturalism is fostered upon a country by its sponsors who intend to benefit from its acceptance. 

Those who sponsor multiculturalism are properly called multiculturalists and generally will be found to be those people with the least amount of personal culture appertaining to them. As a dying tree drops its leaves and is attacked by fungus and worms of decay, so to is a nation set upon by multiculturalists. The dominate culture is attacked from all sides. This is not so much a product of maliciousness as necessity. By vilifying, leveling, and weakening the dominant culture, an environment is created for social, political, and economic turmoil which produces change that will benefit the sponsors of a multiculturalist state. If the government and news media relentlessly pursue issues of race, gender, and diversity in preference to the real issues that need to be addressed, there will be an increasing division of society along the same lines. Which is exactly what the sponsors of multiculturalism want. 

Social instability, caused by a steady erosion of standards and values, coupled with a scramble over dwindling economic opportunities by conflicting ethnic groups, produces precisely the alienation and conflict needed to implement a multicultural state. Further, the lack of common standards and values leads to personal disorganization, resulting in unsociable behavior. This is the life support system of a multicultural state. In a word: anomie. 

As a political tool multiculturalism has several applications. It is used to prevent a national consensus among the electorate. The confluence of divergent life views, cultures, beliefs, religions, ethnic habits, etc. insures a swirling river of discontent upon which the multiculturalist rides. It is a perfect method of ensuring that there can never in the future be accord, unity, and a common agreed upon destiny among those ruled. Multiculturalism represents a basic form of divide and conquer, to the benefit of corrupt government and its sponsors. 

Multiculturalism is likewise a financial tool used to socially and economically level a targeted population. When implemented, it becomes in fact a battle over scarce resources and shrinking economic opportunities, with government weighing in on the side of cheap labour. A continual flow of impoverished workers is insured through immigration (both legal and illegal), who by working for less compensation continually drive wages down. For the vast majority of citizens the standard of living will not increase, but rather constantly decrease. 

As a general rule:

The amount of multiculturalism in any society is directly proportional to the corruption at the top of a political system and inversely proportional to national unity. 
 

This means: multiculturalism will have succeeded in so much as the country has failed. 

Multiculturalism can further be used as "transitional tool" to take a targeted population from one form of government to another. When a political condition of greed, massive corruption, and diversity of objective is coupled to a social condition of drugs, violence, and discontent, therein exists the perfect environment for governmental change to a system that more closely serves long term interests of ruling elitists. Seeing that both the problem and solution are provided by the same people makes the CIA's importation of some one hundred billion dollars worth of cocaine and other drugs into the United States understandable. While at the same time explaining FBI, ATF, and other, more secretive federal government agencies involvement in domestic terrorism or its cover-up. Suddenly, that which erroneously was previously thought to be unrelated events show their common thread and purpose. 

Within the deleterious milieu of multiculturalism exists the propaganda opportunity for re-education of the people into a more malleable entity. A targeted population will be shaped mentally by new forms of public education in the schools, media indoctrination, and by elitist pronouncements. Thus placed in a crucible of economic necessity and social pressure, once free citizens become despondent masses, adjusting to and accepting fundamentally changing national circumstances as a matter of expedient survival. For the reticent, conformity by force will ensue in the form of legal penalties disguised as ant-drug, anti-terrorism, or anti-hate laws. All of this leading toward what George Orwell so aptly predicted in his book 1984

"Almost certainly we are moving into an age of totalitarian dictatorships. An age in which freedom of thought will be at first a deadly sin and later on a meaningless abstraction."

A society is being spawned where those with the most unsociable behavior, deviant lifestyle, or personal failures are given the most by government. This is no accident! It is not government blundering, nor is it misguided liberalism; it is exactly what it is by design, purpose, and objective. A program advocated by both Republican and Democratic administrations for the elitist backers of both are the same. It is the program of a government which has fallen firmly into the hands of evil forces. Failure to recognize this salient point will result in endlessly chasing after tangents, or needlessly blaming those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Anger directed toward liberals,(2) Blacks, or people of colour is wasted. Reorganization of the government from the bottom up would be productive. 

Multiculturalism, like drugs, is an insidious weapon. Both destroy the heart and fabric of a people. All ties to family, community, and one's people as a whole are destroyed by these two opiates of the human mind. Both are sponsored from the top down by one world elitists bent upon creating a world order who's power is such that its subjects posses no potential for resistance. 

By its very nature every emerging police state seeks to harness both the power of the state and the people to its will. When calls are made for support of cryptic slogans such as war on crime, drugs, terrorism, hate, poverty, etc. what is really meant is "grant power to the state and applaud the rape of your freedom." In sum: multiculturalism is another program designed to create the subjects of a Police State Without Borders. When coupled with the "war on drugs" and "war on terrorism," Orwell's world of endless war is realized. It would be their world, their orders, and nothing new, for a lust for despotism is as old as mankind himself. 

The anti-thesis of multiculturalism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation. Belief in one's self and the ultimate good of his people. A cohesiveness that produces a national vision, with set boundaries of acceptability and unacceptability in the affairs of a nation, while allowing for the natural differences in men. Multiculturalism as a tool of warfare becomes impotent and rejected in such an environment. 

A necessary first step toward recovery is to look at politics, social policy, and government emanating from Washington D.C. with new eyes, unclouded by a lifetime of   false information and deception propagated by elitist sponsors. Pretending any longer that the bought and paid for political prostitutes in Washington D.C. represent you or anyone you know is tantamount to cutting your own wrist with a razor blade. Self-destructive behavior may qualify one for government "protected class status" under diversity laws–but it will not save you, your family, or your nation. 

America, Canada, and most of Europe are ruled by politicians about whom the best that can be said is that they are men of ill repute, each out to loot the state. One thing is clear, the American ruling elite of today are far closer in ideological viewpoint to world government ruled by a privileged few than it is to the world of the American Revolution or the Constitutional Convention of 1789. Yet still, the spirit of 1776 lives on in this land. For once again rebellion to tyrants in obedience to God is afoot. Listen closely and in the distance you can hear the ring of  liberty's bell calling gallant sons and noble daughters to her aid. They know no left, nor right, only treason. And they will not fear to answer. Let tyrants tremble. And though the heavens fall, let there be justice. 

_________________________________________

Foot Notes:

1. Those who imagine the United Nations in and of itself as a military threat are naive or deliberately mislead. Global elitist would never trust the U.N. with an army other than one on loan. Because of the U.N.'s diversity there is too great a potential for some member states taking as serious elitist propaganda of "democratic" rule and "equality" then using any military that might exist without elitist sanction. NATO on the other hand is controlled by the United States government, which is the chief force behind the establishment of the New World Order. It is, and will remain in the foreseeable future, the army of choice for insuring compliance. A quick change of hat from green to blue will make NATO troops "UN Forces" when such need is sanctioned by elitists.

2. Indeed liberal thinkers such as Daniel Brandt have written far more eloquently about the deleterious effects of multiculturalism than the present writer. Brandt's essay Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite is a must read for those interested in the subject.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

I do not support Mr.Beams racist views, but I have a great admiration for his knowledge of Americas problems. Save your hate for those who destroy our country, regardless of their color.

Multiculturalism

MARRIAGE, DEMOCRACY, AND DICTATORSHIP IN AMERICA

October 11th, 2012 by

 

http://www.newswithviews.com/Masters/roy124.htm

By Roy Masters

Author of "Hypnotic States of Americans"
October 10, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

"Democracy passes into despotism." – Plato

We were all born sovereign with the potential of beginning the world all over again. In 1776 a nation rose to protect the rights of the sovereign citizens from the lawless mob, by establishing a democratic republic. The kind of citizen upon which America was built is the smallest most precious member, the noble citizen core cell.

In the 1960s America began to be dismantled, and as a misguided, polite society we forgot to defend our language, culture and borders. We became a "compassionate" democracy and made everyone special and morally equivalent even to demand rights, those strange appetites and lawless behaviors. With such people elevated to our noble values of citizenship, our people allowed themselves and their children to become demoralized and dumbed down by our seeking their acceptance. And so without the checks and balances of moral versus immoral behavior, the rabble multiplied and began voting in their kind into a democratic government that would be destined to become a divided country leading to dictatorship and civil war.

In the Hearts of Men

For thousands of years, a desperate struggle for power has raged on in most homes, resulting in one partner or the other rising as a despotic dictator. One form of despotism is the willful female, with a wimpy victim husband and a terrified brood of demoralized, psychotic or violently rebellious children. Such a left leaning female dictatorship spawns the equivalent; a right leaning male, violently seeking to retrieve his lost role as the authorized head of the home, but always in the wrong way. Right wing could become the dangerously collective disenfranchised males attempting to restore order from the chaos caused by the permissiveness of female-centered homes and their socialist benefactors.

In the United States we have recently seen Democrats playing the role of willful spoiling females, with limp-wristed Republicans playing husbands, struggling and failing in the game of sexual politics, in much the same way most fail in their miserable home lives. Meanwhile, the people have become like traumatized children watching their parents fight over them and becoming polarized in their allegiances to the extreme left- and right-leaning factions as represented by mom and dad.

In most countries, this kind of relationship leads to incurable civil wars, where the winner invariably becomes the new dictator. Therefore the cure lies not in politics, but in the hearts of men. Civil War is the macrocosm in which faulty marital relationships are the microcosm.

Whenever the moral center collapses, the fringe left and the fringe right move in to fill the void, coming together in mortal conflict where innocence cannot survive. Had the United States of America, a sovereign culture, not stood its ground on the principle of freedom for everyone, we would have allowed World War II to plunge the entire world into a permanent darkness, only to end up including ourselves into the forever darkness of misery. Alas, we have retreated from such grace.

The invisible hand of social engineering has succeeded in collapsing the male center of responsibility and hence the family. Women have cunningly been taught to disenfranchise their husbands as fathers, replacing them with boyfriends and the "security" of government fathers. We are unwittingly falling into the time-honored trap, going the way of all nations before us as they dance to the tune of the Pied Piper of sexual politics. Yet there is hope: in these last hours we can still fulfill our founding fathers’ dream by understanding the universal vulnerability of women and the male weakness for them.

The Undeclared War of Masculine and Feminine Politics

Every emotional or excessively willful woman, married to a weak or equally unprincipled ambitious man, exists in a war zone, struggling like a battling dinosaur, with the biggest meanest sinner always ruling the lesser; a family of living hell. The loser filled with anxiety surrenders power to the hate object monster. Because a bigger beast is also less than a person, the tyrant likewise feels pangs for what he or she has become. Man and woman so joined live under the compulsion to destroy one another and pass the legacy of misery on to their children.

So it is with the two American political parties who war with never a peaceful solution in sight. Wherever someone rules with might masquerading as "right," there is endless struggle for power with inevitable tragedy and desolation.

In the battle of the sexes, masculine and feminine becomes left- and right-wing politics. Where both parties set aside their selfish ambitions and yield to what is right in their hearts, recognizing the inborn sense of common sense good, true peace and prosperity is never far off. This inborn order on Earth as it is in heaven, is the reverse of the order on Earth as it is in hell. Government over woman over children over man is the kingdom of hell. God in Christ, over man over woman, over children and them all loving the noble order of godly men as head of the household–that alone is the ideation of the kingdom of heaven on earth.

In the broken man-woman relationships there is an undeclared war where the lie of love causes either party to wake up only to find they are losing a war they didn't know they were fighting. The injured party rarely suspects any subversive motives until covert war is over, then off comes the gloves and the smiling "loving mask,” and this is where open, violent rebellion of the victim begins.

In a like fashion, the two political parties are bound together in an unholy matrimony, with America's treasures going to the socially-engineered left, the most deceitful party. An alien has entered into what could be a noble nation under God – and like in a bad marriage the usurped body politic has been alienating and dividing the people and stealing our freedoms waiting for a doomsday moment to strike. Just like the tyrant in every inherently programmed home, so rises a dictatorship in every adulterous nation made up of bad marriages.

The Rise of the Mob System

Bullies are not born that way; they come from loveless homes, traumatized from their original innocence. Demoralized children, having the transplanted seed of that terrorist/victim inside them, are fatally weak before the strong and strong before the weak. Neither one is capable of dealing with ever present stress due to the terror of their past. This is what unconsciously empowers tyrants to revel in a glorious rush provided by the servility of a chain gang of victims; strong before the weak and weak before the strong with everybody a coward before their own bully. America has become a dog-eat-dog country with the biggest bully of all pulling the strings at top of the political heap of sinful, mesmerized people all slouching towards Sodom and Gomorrah.

Bullies intimidate and thus harvest the innocent essence of others, redeeming a false sense of worth by doing unto others and helplessly trying to retrieve from others the innocence someone originally took from the bully. All desolate souls, deprived of God's loving validation, become nothing more than a chain gang of servants of hell on earth.

Dictatorships are built on the chain of desolate souls, offering themselves up, one into another as living sacrifices to the upside down political authority on top. All are like this—in transition and transformation and fulfilling the glory of their devil “God,” whom they have mistaken for the real God.

The desolate soul has no choice but to be consumed by the dog-eat-dog system and then spit out as a replica of the thing it hates. Those who sit atop the pyramid feed on the failure of humanity. Life force is passed up the chain of command and wicked authority passed down the chain of command. Here we find even children infecting children so that the littlest have no choice but to take out their frustration by pulling wings from butterflies or bullying their baby brothers and sisters. There is little escape from such a system, because the voices of dissent are too few and powerless before the multitudes of the mad body politic.

Standing Firm Against the Mob System

Do you see now how important it is for every person to discover redemption—something inner that will return them to sovereign freedom that is America? You can no longer afford to yield before a bully husband, a bully wife, a bully child, and the bully boss or business partner. And to do this, the first lesson you need to learn is how to never be humiliated or intimidated whereby you fall to resentment. Resentment represents the spiritual weakness that translates into the bully-coward system from which there is no hope of redemption.

In religious parlance, resentment is the handmaiden of ego, or pride. Puffing up in the resentful pride of judgment, your soul is separated from the power of good through which evil might be overcome. Bullies crave control usually because of mysterious loss of selfhood that may be traced to their own childhood traumas, and hence loss of sovereignty. Like it or not bullies replicate the identity of their tormentor and rule exponentially over a disproportionate number of victims.

The schoolteacher in a chain of command may have an innocent face towards you, as if the problem lies with your child, but the actual cause of the problem is the face he or she exhibits toward the child.

This is true with the socialist government, where social problems are created so that helpless victims are further demoralized by being subsidized by a continuum of bureaucratic passive-aggression. The problems caused by the two-faced, passive-aggressive sorts are Legion—with the tendency to create demoralized people are who are compelled to cry out for the cure to the very authorities that created the unnecessary problem in the first place. Thus do such bureaucracies create permanent job security for themselves (while you lose your job) while creating mass dependence welfare. The highest ambition of any bully is to become the government of bullies.

The Moral Decline

The demoralization of every country and society marked for destruction usually begins by the seduction that is manipulative and seductively feminine by nature. 20th century Russian psychiatrists pioneering in the destruction of family have successfully utilized this approach in their quest for world domination. They succeeded in improving upon the ancient enmity between men and women, from which arise all the horrors that have been and ever will be.

The duality of mankind's nature, especially the arrogant proclivity to rule and worship, has been multiplying itself through the generations from a common root origin–the metaphor being the serpent in the garden of Paradise lost. All men seem to inherit vulnerability to the seductive feminine essence through an unbroken lineage. And so through transference, our subjectivity to serve those who make us fail will continue to pass down to demoralizing governments. Before that can happen, we need to more perfectly understand what our collective weakness is, and for each one of us to face our personal demons.

The present (left-wing) domination of any culture marked for destruction begins with intimidation and sexual liberation, with its bottomless pit of freedom from responsibility. It all begins with what fools call freedom and what John Milton calls license. "None can love freedom heartily but good men," he said, "the rest love not freedom, but license." Thus, by way of sexual promiscuity and the hypocritical stench that rises from the pit of common iniquities, people unconsciously abandon the sovereign law of their hearts and descend into slavery. And thus it comes to pass that all hell on earth happens this way. Plato predicted this when he said, "Democracy passes into despotism."

For the devil has sworn in his rotten heart that he will multiply misery and suffering to the end that men will destroy each other and leave no one left to inherit the kingdom of God.

Tainted Love

You see, don't you, that man's inherent first need is sympathy for the inherent flawed self. It is called ego in psychology or pride in religious parlance. The love of a mother and wife, which in the untainted state would nurture husband and child in a wholesome way, tends to nurture their weakness instead. That is why the politics of liberalism with its phony compassion are guilefully feminine and create dependencies rather than freedoms. On the other hand, true love teaches a man to catch a fish—instead of feeding him fish and keeping him dependent, as the enslavers will. Likewise, it is tainted love that the egos of wrong men crave, having been perverted to need it, to the mutual detriment and downfall of themselves and their loved ones.

Just as a man will often leave his decent wife for a woman who meets those secret, lawless and unfulfilled ego needs, so does the compromised populace betray their countrymen by exchanging freedom for such compassionate offerings as the various socialist welfare entitlement programs provide. Such security is rarely seen for what it really is—a reverse order of life, with the malevolent spirit first providing and then presiding over a nation of wretched souls. America has become the welfare state of mothers and government fathers, leaving the country dangerously divided between those who are still free and loyal to the founding fathers’ values and those who are not. Understanding the pure nature of marriage would change everything back to what it was when we were a republic—one nation under God.

Can anyone question the power of a beautiful woman to deceive and seduce a man from his potential root of reason? Can anyone question the self-evident fact that all too many men are notoriously weak for the reassuring candy of lying love? Even Samson with all his strength could not see through the subtle treachery of Delilah, nor could he resist her voluptuous, overpowering pleasures—and his fall had devastating consequences.

Since the Dawn of Man, all that is bad or good culture tends to be nurtured and passed on through the female. All noble, successful cultures revolve around the properly nurturing mothers and respectful noble fathers. Mutations for all living things arise from a strictly environmental source. However, in the demoralized void of personal power there lurks a malevolent presence compelling men to revel in the false security offered by despots, first in their sexual relationships and then in booze, drugs and politics. If what has been said here is true, then what is needed are truly noble men to restore the balance of order at home and in politics. One cannot exist without the other.

The Political Breakdown

Dictatorship can usually be identified as extreme fascist-left or fascist-pseudo-religious-right wing. However, regardless of the party name or affiliation a chain of command comprised of passive aggressive individuals forms the base of every kind of dictatorial power. All passive-aggressive bullies are insecure petty dictators in their own realms of business and home lives. Family tyrants identify with any rising political party and will elect them for the license to legitimize their perverse gratification. All tyrannical governments that represent any political system are made up of passive-aggressive, power-hungry manipulators – yes, of both sexes.

Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin legitimized street thugs and criminals gathered from the prisons to intimidate and then to enforce what then became the law of the lawless. The limitless power of dictatorship, derived by playing to the mob, unleashes evil instincts with unimaginable horrors. All governments of the extreme left or right can rise to power as well—by staffing their agencies with criminals, perverts and degenerates with strange appetites to ensure the populace remains under conditioned reflex responses that keep them submissive to authoritarian rule in a mindless way. And it all begins with a government granting rights to intimidating fringe groups who slowly but surely get their way much like in broken family situations.

As a dictator, one man alone cannot possibly carry out the mass murder and mayhem inherent in such a system, all of which is necessary to create an environment of fear. The horror of despotism requires a chain of command of willing executioners, an army of like-minded clones that are rewarded for their cruelty and incompetence. In every culture there exists that conscienceless class of ambitious, power-hungry people who will unwittingly elect away their own (and others) freedoms, to form a government of the unrighteous, by the unrighteous, and for the unrighteous.

Unfortunately, the mob rises to rule where a democratic republic becomes democracy and where all men are thought to be equal when of course they are not. The laws of the heart ought to be the laws on the books, but as you can see such laws are offensive to compromised perverts of socialism whose sole aim is to bring our country down through such lawlessness as has been described.

Exploiting the confusion of what it means to be equal, virtuous or not, come socialist engineers—and the rest is history. Briefly, when you give rights to the wrong people the wrong people will take away the right rights, and the right people's rights.

Communists shroud their "democracy" with different disguises from time to time. Presently, it's the Green or environmental party causing us to forget that we are a democratic republic—an entirely different creature.

In an attempt to establish democracy and displace our Republic, Democrats called to "strengthen their democracy," by inviting the rebel of every race and color and creed to cross open borders, to change by mingling our language and culture, in an attempt to overwhelm our Republic, and they are succeeding. The goal of communism was to be achieved not by bullets, but by ballots, not by illegal, but by legal means, not by a few wicked powerful persons—but the consensus vote of a majority whose minds have been manipulated by the media.

James Madison wrote,

"In a pure democracy there is nothing to check the enforcements to sacrifice the weak party…. Hence, it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence in contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security in all rights of property, and having in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths."

Rome, once a magnificent Republic, declined into a democracy with the inevitable irreversible plunge into despotism that we are seeing in our country today.

To free yourself from the state where neither rebellion nor conformity helps, you must learn to deal properly, without resentment, to pressures of any kind. My Be Still and Know meditation exercise shows you how to do this and helps you practice remaining in the proper state. You can get a copy at fhu.com or by calling 800-877-3227.

Contact Roy Masters

Listen to Roy Masters LIVE call in radio show Monday to Friday from 9 PM to 11 PM Pacific on KDWN Radio in Las Vegas, NV.

© 2012 Roy Masters – All Rights Reserved

 

Immorality

America Has Already Collapsed

October 5th, 2012 by

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/10/america-has-already-collapsed.html

 

By Brandon Smith,
 

Many of us in the liberty movement find ourselves searching for a distinct root cause of the trials and tribulations of American culture — the Holy Grail catalyst that, if unraveled, would save this country and heal the septic wounds covering the landscape of our hobbled society. The obvious answer would be to remove the global elites who are poisoning the well from the picture entirely. Yes, this has to be done eventually. However, we must also identify how those elites have been able to so thoroughly con the masses of this nation for so long.

What inherent weakness has made us susceptible to manipulation? For this question, there are NO easy answers. But, if I had to choose a single frailty of our collective psyche as paramount to our downfall, I would say that Americans most of all are confounded by their own patriotism. We often embrace the ideal without knowing what it really means.

There are in fact two kinds of patriotism: the concrete, and the imagined. Many Americans fall haphazardly into the fantasy of being patriotic. They define patriotism upon the exploits of the mainstream and of the government in control at the time. They become cheerleaders for the establishment instead of stalwart champions of their country’s founding principles. In fact, true patriotism is NOT about blindly defending one’s nation or leadership regardless of its trespasses; true patriotism is about defending the philosophy that made one’s nation possible and prosperous in the first place — even if that means standing against the power structure in place today.

I often hear the uneducated and unaware claim that America and its principles have been a bane to the rest of the world. They say America is at the center of the vampire squid, flailing its vicious tentacles against innocent foreign civilizations. This is an oversimplification at best. The crimes that these well-meaning but naïve activists scorn cannot be attributed to “America” because the American ideal has been completely abandoned by those in the seat of power in our modern era. We do not live in “America” — at least, not the America that the Founding Fathers and authors of the Constitution created. Therefore, the original philosophy that gave birth to America is not the issue, the abuse and neglect of that philosophy is.

America has been ransacked and deformed into a hideous lampoon of its former self. This has been done for the most part through the destruction of the guiding principles we pretend we still hold onto as a culture, but in reality have cast aside. If we are ever to undo the damage that has already been done, we have to rediscover what the original design of America was. Wailing and growling about the inadequacies of the present does nothing unless we also establish where it is that we have fallen from grace. What is America supposed to be? What did the Founders truly intend?

America Is Supposed To Be Controlled By The People

The concept of a Republic revolves around a reversal of the traditional narrative of power. Throughout most of history, government stood at the top of the pyramid, where the hands of a few dominated the destinies of the citizenry. The future was a matter for the elites, not the peasants, to be concerned with. The American Republic, as designed by the revolutionary colonists who defeated the old oligarchy (at least for a time), flipped the role of government to servant rather than master. The goal was to make government tangible and accountable rather than abstract and untouchable. The America of today has no such accountability anymore.

We have a two-party system that pursues the mechanizations of globalism in tandem, not in contest. When both parties have the same desires and goals, when both parties collude to remove civil liberties rather than protect them, and when both parties are funded by the same corporate backers, there is no such thing as change through the process of elections. Anyone who claims that government corruption can be punished through the ballot box hasn’t the slightest clue how our system really functions. They think we are still living in the original “America,” one that values the voice of the people.

When the government decides to push through banker bailouts, the Patriot Act, the National Defense Authorization Act, etc., all while ignoring opposition by a vast majority of citizens, it is clear that the paradigm has shifted and the American value of representation by and for the people is lost.

America Is Supposed To Prosper Through Free Markets

One of the first acts of the American Revolution in the fight against British tyranny was to decouple from British economic dominance. They stopped relying on goods produced in England and peddled by the European merchant class and began making their own. From homespun clothing to homemade rifles, Americans created a legitimate free-market environment. Free markets are systems controlled by the people, thriving on the natural functions of supply and demand. They are not administered by bureaucracies or corporate hierarchies that manipulate the economy to fit preconceived political and social ends.

Free markets are decentralized markets. Corporations, which obstruct decentralization, were never meant to exist according to Adam Smith, the architect of traditional free markets. Today’s framework operates on centralization and the removal of options and choices, which is facilitated by the imbalance and lack of accountability in the corporate legal structure.

I have to laugh every time I hear someone attack “capitalism” and free markets as the source of all our ills. America has not had the pleasure of free markets for at least 100 years (since the construction of the private Federal Reserve, a collusion between banking and government interests). No one alive today has ever seen an actual American “free market” beyond community barter, so to blame free markets for our modern failings is rather thoughtless. To summarize, the U.S. economy is nothing like what the founders envisioned and fought for.

America Is Supposed To Have A Reserved Foreign Policy

The Founding Fathers specifically sought to keep America out of foreign entanglements and haphazard alliances. They knew from experience that the elites and monarchies of Europe often used wars as a means of consolidating power and keeping populations in relative fear. They were well aware of the methodologies of Niccolo Machiavelli and knew that forced alliances were a trap used to ensnare nations into unnecessary conflict and financial dependency while keeping the masses subservient through false patriotism.

Today, our government has utterly violated the original principles of reserved foreign policy, especially in the past century. The excuse always used is that “we are under attack,” yet we usually discover later that these “attacks” were actually fabricated by our own leaders. From the sinking of the USS Maine, to the sinking of the Lusitania, to the Gulf of Tonkin and beyond, for the past 100 years, Americans have been presented with false flag threats used as leverage to convince us to become entangled in foreign engagements. This strategy has become so common that elitists now openly admit their intentions to commit future false flags in order to draw us into yet another war,this time with Iran.

The current policy of “exporting democracy” has not only been a complete failure (just look at Egypt, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.), it is also a total affront to the foundation of the American dynamic. Patriotism in the name of interventionism is foolhardy and decidedly un-American.

America Is Supposed To Respect Individual Rights

The Founders witnessed the extreme abuses of government firsthand: invasion of privacy, invasion of property, wrongful arrest and imprisonment, loss of representation, overt and malicious taxation, thuggish law enforcement, and the targeting of those who dared to dissent in their speech. The excuse used by the British for their tyrannical behavior was, essentially, national security. In the end, though, the elites’ actions had nothing to do with security for the populous and everything to do with what they saw as opposition to their hegemony. Our government has become a mirror image of the elitist power-mongers of Britain in the days of the revolution. Absolutely everything the colonists fought against has been re-established by the globalists in our political structure today, once again, all in the name of national security.

We have seen the enslavement of our money supply and general economy by the Federal Reserve; invasive and violent taxation through the Internal Revenue Service; loss of privacy through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance and the Patriot acts; loss of property rights through multiple agencies including the Bureau of Land Management, the Environmental Protection Agency, the IRS, the Food and Drug Administration, etc. (who claim their tightening fist is for our own safety, yet they constantly overlook corporate misdeeds that put the public in true danger while pummeling average citizens for minor or non-existent offenses); the militarization of law enforcement through the Department of Homeland Security and Federally dominated fusion centers; potential loss of Habeas Corpus through the NDAA; and even wrongful arrest against those who merely speak openly of their discontent (look into the case of Marine veteran Brandon Raub for a taste of what lay ahead).

What Have We Become?

Those who rally behind the modern concept of America rally behind a façade — an empty shell devoid of the heart and soul that gave life to this once great experiment. I do not support what America is. I support what America was and what it could be again if the truth is adequately smashed into the faces of the currently oblivious public. If this country is content to suckle from the putrid teat of globalism and forsake the moral force of conscience that gave it life, then it has become another place — an alien land.

I have heard the argument that America is meant to be a kind of chameleon built to change its stripes and adapt to the demands of the era. I have heard it argued that the Constitution and the principles of the Founding Fathers are outdated and inadequate for our new age of technological wizardry and terrorist ideologies. This is pure intellectual idiocy. The principles of freedom never expire. Individual liberty is inherent and eternal. It is the driving force of every great accomplishment in the history of mankind. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights embody the spirit of that eternal battle of individual liberty. There is no adaptation. There is only freedom or tyranny.

It is time for us to decide what kind of Americans we wish to be: the deluded rah-rah puppets of a desiccated totalitarian society, or the watchmen on the wall. Will we be the keepers and protectors of the vital core of the American identity, or will we be fly-by-night consumers of the flavor-of-the-day political carnival, eating every tainted sample from the elitist platter in an insane attempt to replace our free heritage with a sleek, sexy, rehashed form of top-down feudalism?

You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com 

 

It's Over

 

U S Banks Love Real Dollars and Illegal Drug Money Comes in Cash

June 26th, 2012 by

http://truth-out.org/news/item/9937-how-the-us-government-banks-prison-industrial-complex-corrupt-officials-businesses-law-enforcement-racists-and-the-cia-benefit-from-illegal-drugs

Mark Karlin

Truthout

A recent article in The Guardian UK offers evidence that “while cocaine production ravages countries in Central America, consumers in the US and Europe are helping developed economies grow rich from the profits.”

According to The Guardian UK story, the study by two Colombian professors found that “2.6% of the total street value of cocaine produced remains within the country [Columbia], while a staggering 97.4% of profits are reaped by criminal syndicates and laundered by banks, in first-world consuming countries.”

 

One of the researchers, Alejandro Gaviria said: “We know that authorities in the US and UK know far more than they act upon. The authorities realize things about certain people they think are moving money for the drug trade – but the DEA [US Drug Enforcement Administration] only acts on a fraction of what it knows.”

“It’s taboo to go after the big banks,” added Gaviria’s co-researcher Daniel Mejía. “It’s political suicide in this economic climate, because the amounts of money recycled are so high.”

Since Wachovia Bank (now owned by Wells Fargo) was levied a fine in 2010 (but no criminal charges) for money laundering hundreds of millions (perhaps billions) of illegal drug cartel dollars, there does not appear to be any large crackdown on the practice in the United States, although lip service is often given to coming down hard on money laundering.

Indeed, more than one analyst has speculated that the billions of dollars in drug cash are vitally important to US banks because so many of their financial assets are tied up in non-fluid assets.

According to a 2011 article in AlterNet:

Antonio Maria Costa, former executive director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime said in 2008, “there’s evidence to suggest that proceeds from drugs and crimes were the only liquid investment capital for banks in trouble of collapsing [during the financial crisis].”

If billions of dollars in drug money rescued banks and other financial institutions from closing down then it’s reasonable to argue that the economy itself is addicted to drugs.

As professor Dale Scott noted in his book, American War Machine: Deep Politics; the CIA Global Drug Connection: “A US Senate … banking committee reportedly estimated that between $500 billion and $1 trillion dollars are laundered each year through banks worldwide, with approximately half of that amount funneled through US Banks.”

In the ’70s and ’80s, Miami became known as a city that was experiencing an economic renaissance based on the flow of illegal drug money (mostly from Colombia at the time) into the city. But the cash didn’t just get laundered through banks; it was used to buy legitimate businesses; condos; houses; investments; and more than likely a lot of corrupt law enforcement, custom and government officials.

Estimated $50 Billion in Illegal Drug Sales From Mexico Can Only Occur With US Corruption

In interviews, Truthout has been told again and again that the chain of distribution for illegal drugs is changing. Whereas before it was divided primarily among Mafia families in big cities, the Latin American cartels have now set up networks within the US.

But one thing hasn’t changed; it still takes a lot of corruption to buy off virtual domestic impunity for the kingpins overseeing the domestic sale of prohibited drugs. Searching Google, you can find everything from Transportation Security Administration agents paid off to let drugs pass through airport checks, to cops who look the other way or actually steal the drug money, to border patrol agents letting drugs pass through, to local government officials overlooking illegal activity.

However, rarely does one come across the arrest and prosecution of a kingpin in the United States, or of a high-level law enforcement official in a major city or a politician being indicted. Does this mean that powerful individuals in the government and law enforcement are all squeaky clean as $50 billion in illegal drugs go whizzing through America, day in and day out? Not likely.

The emphasis of the DEA, FBI and the Department of Homeland Security is on catching the “guppies” without appearing to be working their way up to the people running the wholesale-to-retail illicit drug business in the US or their protectors. (In Latin America, however, the US is all about catching kingpins, although that doesn’t often happen.)

For instance, the El Paso Times reported last year that “two former law enforcement officers allege that they cannot get anyone to investigate allegations that the Mexican drug cartels have corrupted US law officers and politicians in the El Paso border region…. Gonzales and Dutton allege that the FBI dropped them after ‘big names’ on the US side of the border began to surface in the drug investigations.”

David Ramirez rose up the ranks of the Border Patrol to become a special agent at the Department of Homeland Security. He just wrote a book, “Beneath the Same Sky,” a candid analysis of the borderland drug war. Interviewed by the Texas Tribune, he described US customs corruption matter-of-factly:

I can only tell you my experiences and what I saw. It was the lure of the money and as I write in the book, they offer this inspector $50,000 for what I call a “wave” – a loaded vehicle to come through the port. And they guaranteed them five vehicles a week so you are talking that kind of money, which is tempting. You have to be a man or a woman who knows their moral ground to say, “No. I am not doing it….”

“It’s capitalism, I would think – supply and demand,” Ramirez said further. “The demand for the drug is here and then we say, ‘Okay Mexico or Latin America, fix your problem over there, but we still want our drugs.’”

Different Interests in the US Financially Gain From the War on Drugs 

It’s not just that some law enforcement officials are corrupt. They don’t need to be for police departments to make money from arresting minor drug offenders.

Police departments around the nation gain from laws that allow the seizing of assets that the law enforcement officers allege may be related to drug crime, without even a court case involved. The libertarian CATO institute wrote about this practice that allows the agencies to use the proceeds from the confiscated money or property to enlarge departmental budgets. The report is called “Forfeit for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture.”

Law enforcement agencies can also get extra money from federal grants if they show a high number of arrests related to drug use and selling, so it is of financial value to the department to arrest as many people for drug related offenses as possible.

Neill Franklin is executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP). He calls this change to an emphasis on arrests of the drug user as a “shift to the numbers game” for police departments to receive more funding. Franklin, a 34-year law enforcement veteran of the Maryland State Police and Baltimore Police Department, said, “we worked in predominantly white areas, yet most of our cases and lock ups were minorities. There were very few cases in the outlying areas that involved whites.”

Franklin told Truthout:

“Over my career I saw a shift to a war on the users of drugs. In the ’70s when I worked narcotics it was about working your way up the chain of the sellers to the kingpins. That’s how it was. As we got further into the ’80s and ’90s, we attacked the demand side. We concentrated on locking up the usual street corner suspects and before we knew it we had quadrupled the incarceration rate and most of that increase was from us arresting users. A lot of the small time dealers sell drugs because they need to support their habit of using drugs. The day of the law enforcement concentrating on kingpins has gone. It’s all about increasing the numbers of arrests.”

To Franklin this brings up the question of why privatized prison companies are simultaneously benefiting financially from the increased incarceration, a subject that has been analyzed many times on Truthout. If the Correction Corporation of America needs a 90 percent capacity rate to make a profit on a prison, then you need to put the bodies in the beds. Franklin pointed out that the profiteering doesn’t end with the prison business. There is the drug testing industry, parole officers, prosecutors, police, lawyers, rehabilitation counselors, psychologists etc. Arresting minor drug offenders, in short, is big business.

Race, Drugs, Incarceration and the New Jim Crow

Michelle Alexander, author of the paradigm-shifting book on racism through the criminalization of being a black male, “The New Jim Crow,” recently wrote a commentary in The Guardian UK in which she persuasively argues that “the US war on drugs created a whole new generation of the dispossessed, with millions of black people denied their rights.”

Alexander wrote of the racist impact of the war on drugs in the black community, particularly among young black males:

The uncomfortable truth, however, is that crime rates do not explain the sudden and dramatic mass incarceration of African Americans during the past 30 years. Crime rates have fluctuated over the last few decades – they are currently at historical lows – but imprisonment rates have consistently soared. Quintupled, in fact. And the vast majority of that increase is due to the “war on drugs” and the “get tough movement.” Drug offenses alone accounted for about two-thirds of the increase in the federal inmate population, between 1985 to 2000, and more than half of the increase in the state prison population.

The drug war has been brutal, but those who live in white communities have little clue to the devastation wrought. This war has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color, even though studies consistently show that people of all colors use and sell illegal drugs at remarkably similar rates. In fact, some studies indicate that white youths are significantly more likely to engage in illegal drug dealing than black youths. They also have about three times the number of drug-related visits to the emergency room as their African American counterparts.

That is not what you would guess, though, when entering our nation’s prisons and jails, overflowing as they are with black and brown drug offenders. In some states, African Americans comprise 80-90% of all drug offenders sent to prison….

Again, not so. President Ronald Reagan officially declared the current drug war in 1982, when drug crime was declining, not rising. From the outset, the war had little to do with drug crime and nearly everything to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a grand and highly successful Republican party strategy of using racially coded political appeals on issues of crime and welfare to attract poor and working-class white voters who were resentful of, and threatened by, desegregation, busing and affirmative action.

If you follow Alexander’s analysis to its logical conclusion, the war on drugs in the United States fulfills a racist stereotype by disproportionately sending black males (and black women) to jails, where they are branded and marginalized as felons, while white users of illegal drugs – proportionately – are treated much more leniently by law enforcement and the judicial system.

This policy misleadingly confirms stereotypes of blacks that racists love, even though they are put in prison for offenses that are nonviolent in nature and that are driven by poverty, social neglect and incentivized police department arrest numbers.

But it also serves another important purpose. When poor, stereotyped members of society can only find an entrepreneurial future in the illegal drug business, or use drugs as self-medication to allow them to escape the squalidness of vast swathes of urban America that hold little opportunity of employment, the government does not have to attend to building neighborhoods and creating jobs. Drugs become the opiate of the masses, as meth also has in many poor, rural white communities.

As with the 50,000-plus mostly poor Mexicans who have died in the failed war on drugs, certain lives are deemed of less value in the US – and if there is big money to be made out of the drug trade, it’s going to end up in banks and business ventures, not in the hood (with few exceptions). The undesirable resourceless drug users are both profitable and expendable.

US Hegemony and Military Control Over Latin America and the CIA

An established journalist, Gary Webb, wrote a series of articles for the San Jose Mercury-News in 1996 with a shocking account of how the CIA, during the Reagan administration, allowed cocaine to freely be flown into the US (particularly crack cocaine) in return for drug cartel cooperation with funding and arming the Contras against the Sandinistas in the Nicaraguan civil war. At first, the series was a bombshell, but then the CIA fought back through established Eastern newspapers and the Mercury-News retracted the series.

Webb, however, wrote an even more in-depth and credible account of the CIA condoning drugs entering the US in a 1999 book: “Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras and the Crack Cocaine Explosion.” However, his reputation was so slandered by CIA flacks that he eventually committed suicide in 2004.  Subsequent reports, after his death, corroborated the credibility of his investigative account.

It is not the only allegation of the US turning a blind eye or even politically using drugs entering the US as foreign policy strategic tools. Right now, the US is more or less ignoring the surge in poppy growth in Afghanistan so as not to complicate its precarious role in that nation – and the economic need of farmers there. President George Herbert Walker Bush, who headed the CIA for a time, didn’t object to Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega’s (he was a highly paid CIA asset) role in the drug trade until Noriega started to go rogue on US foreign policy, thus being perceived as becoming a threat to the Canal Zone.

In “Beyond Bogota: Diary of a Drug War Journalist,” Garry M. Leech described how the US focus on attacking the growing of cocaine in the Marxist FARC-controlled area is counterproductive, because the right-wing paramilitary area in Columbia grows more and sells it at a cheaper rate. Translated, this means that the US government is more concerned about the political threat of FARC (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) than how much cocaine ends up in the United States.

The drug war in Latin America offers the opportunity to increase US military hegemony and thus preserve markets where the US can dominate governments and obtain cheap labor and natural resources (particularly mining and oil). It also sews death, fear and chaos that stifle populist revolts against oligarchical and military rule.

Drug Cartels Are Headed by Pirate Businessmen Marketing a Commodity in Demand and the American Corporate  Class Loves Supply Side Entrepeneurs

Minus the gruesome violence in their host countries, drug cartels are just illegal businessmen, so the business class in the US can relate to them, as can the CIA. They are aggressive, ruthless and greedy, not unlike some of their bankers on Wall Street.

The cost of a drug war to achieve geopolitical objectives then is immense in the loss of life, the breakdown of civil society in the nations affected in Latin America, and in the moral grounding, racial injustice and credibility of our governmental and business institutions.

Eric E. Sterling, who wrote many of the severe anti-drug laws while serving as former assistant counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, indicated second thoughts in a recent Forbes commentary:

Excluding the significant markets in methamphetamine, Ecstasy, psychedelics and other drugs, this is a criminal retail market in the range of $300 billion annually. Most of the markup is at the retail level. This enormous market is evidence that our efforts to stop the drug supply create the incentives that have grown a global criminal infrastructure of countless drug prohibition enterprises….

All over the world, drug organizations depend upon corrupting border guards, customs inspectors, police, prosecutors, judges, legislators, cabinet ministers, military officers, intelligence agents, financial regulators and presidents and prime ministers. Businesses cannot count on the integrity of government officials in such environments.

And corrupted we have become, while publically taking the moral high ground and precipitating a blood bath in Latin America.

CORRUPT BANKING

The New World Order in 2012 and How We Can Defeat It

June 24th, 2012 by

 

http://www.theglobalistreport.com/new-world-order-2012/

 

By Andrew Puhanic 

In 2012 very few people understand what the New World Order is all about and how the New World Order has evolved to what it is today. This lack of understanding is derived from a systematic denial by the Globalists and Politicians that the New World Order even exists at all.

When the term New World Order first came into vogue in the wake of the Gulf War, but especially following the collapse of the Soviet Union, it evoked the promise of an exciting, higher plateau of international relations, including:

  • International security, particularly between East and West, no longer based on the concept of Mutual Assured Destruction (and other equally MAD theories of deterrence) but guaranteed by the reality of a unipolar world, led by the West.
  • Freedom to travel and migrate for people confined for decades (or entire lifetimes) behind the “Iron Curtain”.
  • Opportunity for the enslaved communist economies of Central and Eastern Europe to serve primarily indigenous needs on the basis of market principles, rather than support the economy of the USSR, as required for decades by the Council on Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA).
  • Transformation of the economies of Russia and the other former Soviet republics into market based ones.
  • The chance for Central and Eastern Europeans and former Soviet citizens to enjoy material advantages previously denied.
  • Freedom for Third World Governments from having to choose sides in the overriding bipolar political / military struggle that had dominated global relations for 45 years.
  • Optimism among Third World leaders who thought that perhaps they could now devote more energy to improving the living standards of their own citizens (the pessimists feared the opposite, now that their UN votes counted for little).
  • The assumption that inevitable regional disputes could be settled quickly on the basis of coordinated international action, possibly on the Gulf War Coalition model.
  • A new scope for collective security by the West with co-operation from much of the Arab World.

Reality of the New World Order in 2012

This view of the New World Order was a rosy one. However, It underestimated and neglected a number of vital factors. The reality of today paints a different picture.

The bipolarity of the geo-political world (one that is forced to accept blame for international tension, even while it provided the longest continuous period of peace Europe had known in the 20th Century) was succeeded not by an orderly unipolar world but by a disorderly multipolar one.

This multi-polarity has, at least, reduced the relative weight of internationalsecurity and military alliances as the currency of international relations and supplanted them with economic and commercial competition that is headed by the Globalists.

The relaxation of international tension has also permitted co-operation and diplomatic breakthrough in areas of Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and Southern Africa, probably not otherwise possible.

Throughout much of the world, the demise of Communism led to a greater acceptance of Western values relating to good government, free press and civil rights.

 

  • Regional and even local problems are tending to become more thoroughly and more quickly globalized, just as global institutions are increasingly paralysed in their attempts to deal with them. The tragic events of Rwanda were one example of how the world took it upon its self to take the blame for the conflict.
  • We face new and destabilizing non-traditional threats to world order, some a byproduct of augmented economic and commercial competition. e.g; environmental degradation, increased economic migration, rising international organized criminal activity, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
  • In Europe and the Middle East, the most immediate and sharply felt threat is that of ethnic conflict and civil war resulting from the release of nationalist and irredentist forces thought to have been excised from the European psyche in 1945. When one contemplates for a moment the carnage in Gorazde, in Mostar and in Sarajevo, how wrong we were!
  • The suppression of ethnicity and nationalism, the centuries-old twin scourges of Europe and the Middle East which, twice in the last 80 years blighted the continents and beyond, turns out to have been only temporary, necessitated by the overriding strategic demands of the Cold War.

Is the New World Order the Old World Disorder?

As is painfully evident in the former Yugoslavia and elsewhere, the forces of nationalism, ethnicity, racism and religious extremism are unbound and unbounded in ways that only the most cynical among us would have predicted possible.

Add to the stark communal violence from pressures of economic restructuring which affects all but the most entrepreneurial or corrupt during the painful but necessary transition from Communism to Capitalism, and the resulting sum is a glaring picture of instability that potentially threatens the security of the entire world.

It is now clear that the end of the Cold War (and the advent of the New World Order) does not mean the end of instability or threat.

What it does is allow for open conflict in regions where formerly such conflict would have been, at best, unthinkable or, at worst, successfully held in check.

How the New World Order in 2012 is Changing?

In this new climate of uncertainty, the very definition of national security has been broadened to include not only protection of traditional political and military targets, but also concern for the illicit transfer of leading-edge technology, the safeguarding of the environment and the containment, through international multilateral means, of regional and ethnic conflict, including euphemistic “civil” wars (a subject largely ignored in the past by the international community).

This approach strongly implies two phenomena: (1) interdependence and the (2) strengthening of international coordinating organizations, specifically the Globalist United Nations.

In response to these requirements of the New World Order, it appears the world is taking the following steps:

1. The world has broadened its concept of national security to include the notion of Co-operative Security. This does not mean it has neglected the narrower concept of military security. It simply recognize that in today’s world the attainment of security includes elements other than the traditional one, e.g.

  • The encouragement of integration among regional economies.
  • The granting of economic assistance over military assistance.
  • Help in the establishment of government.

2. The Globalist Elite are attempting to shift the emphasis away from “collective defence” to “collective security”. They are doing this because the mindset of countries who collaborate to defend themselves (mob mentality) usually do so in order to leverage off other countries' military expertise.

This presents a problem to the Globalists because the collective defence mentality is not primarily driven by fear like the collective security mentality. Therefore, the Globalists are in a better position when countries collaborate (break down their borders and governance via collective security) because this mindset is a self-perpetuating fear that can never be undone (i.e. Once countries collaborate due to collective security, that cooperation is nearly impossible to undo and will eventually morph into a union / world government)

What can we do about the New World Order in 2012?

It is, to an extent, in the hands of each of us; in the intelligence and tolerance with which we approach the truly difficult injustices in contemporary international relations and in the will we bring to bear to correct such inequities.

The New World Order has arrived and needs to be presented for what it is.

The global community of individuals, free from defined roles established by the State, needs to come together tosystematically remove the Globalists within our political and social circles who are intentionally planting the seeds of world governments and the New World Order.

At the moment, the only way we can stop the New World Order is via the following:

  • A systematic campaign that encompasses all types of media to present to the global community what the New World Order is all about and who are the Globalists perpetuating the New World Order ideology.
  • An organised collective that encompasses a core group of anti-Globalists who can encourage a consistent and systematic fight against the Globalists via organised means.
  • Dismantle all government-backed Globalist institutions such as the United Nations and the Council of Foreign Relations so that advocates of the New World Order don’t have an official platform to push their agenda to the unsuspecting public.
  • Take a systematic approach to document and record other lesser-known Globalist institutions such as the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome. To the established anti-Globalist movement, these three institutions are well-known. However, to ordinary people, these institutions are still either unknown or considered conspiracy theory.
  • Stop the disinformation that is rife throughout most education systems about the banking system, economics and how political systems function. If there is a means to provide students guidance about the truth of how our banks, the political system and how our economy functions, at least they will be given an opportunity to hear the truth before being taught the lies of the Globalists and those who were seeking a New World Order.
  • Hold the corporate media accountable when it reports on the issues, stories andnews items that are specific to the Globalists and the Globalist Agenda. The fact of the matter is that 90% of ordinary people receive their news and information directly from the corporate media. The alternative media in its current capacity must continue to grow in numbers to attain a position that will influence the masses.

Final Remarks

At the moment, the Globalists have taken a significant steps backward in their objective to achieve aNew World Order and World Government. This was only achieved by the efforts of the alternative media and anti-Globalist movement.

However, due to the size and nature of the Globalists, the struggle of anti-Globalists will continue for many years to come. We need to strengthen our resolve at an order of magnitude greater than they already have done if we are to bring about a more peaceful and just world.

You can help support this information by voting on Reddit HERE.

Andrew Puhanic is the founder of the Globalist Report. The aim of the Globalist Report is to provide current, relevant and informative information about the Globalists and Globalist Agenda. You can contact Andrew directly by visiting the Globalist Report.

 

GLOBALISM

GLOBAL ELITES THROWN OUT OF ICELAND

June 20th, 2012 by

Dismantles Corrupt Govt Then Arrests All Rothschild Bankers

http://www.freedumbnation.com/?p=2369

Posted by Admin

Since the 1900′s the vast majority of the American population has dreamed about saying “NO” to the Unconstitutional, corrupt, Rothschild/Rockefeller banking criminals, but no one has dared to do so. Why? If just half of our Nation, and the “1%”, who pay the majority of the taxes, just said NO MORE! Our Gov’t would literally change over night. Why is it so hard, for some people to understand, that by simply NOT giving your money, to large Corporations, who then send jobs, Intellectual Property, etc. offshore and promote anti-Constitutional rights… You will accomplish more, than if you used violence. In other words… RESEARCH WHERE YOU ARE SENDING EVERY SINGLE PENNY!!! Is that so hard? The truth of the matter is… No one, except the Icelanders, have to been the only culture on the planet to carry out this successfully. Not only have they been successful, at overthrowing the corrupt Gov’t, they’ve drafted a Constitution, that will stop this from happening ever again. That’s not the best part… The best part, is that they have arrested ALL Rothschild/Rockefeller banking puppets, responsible for the Country’s economic Chaos and meltdown.

Last week 9 people were arrested in London and Reykjavik for their possible responsibility for Iceland’s financial collapse in 2008, a deep crisis which developed into an unprecedented public reaction that is changing the country’s direction.

It has been a revolution without weapons in Iceland, the country that hosts the world’s oldest democracy (since 930), and whose citizens have managed to effect change by going on demonstrations and banging pots and pans. Why have the rest of the Western countries not even heard about it?

Pressure from Icelandic citizens’ has managed not only to bring down a government, but also begin the drafting of a new constitution (in process) and is seeking to put in jail those bankers responsible for the financial crisis in the country. As the saying goes, if you ask for things politely it is much easier to get them.

This quiet revolutionary process has its origins in 2008 when the Icelandic government decided to nationalise the three largest banks, Landsbanki, Kaupthing and Glitnir, whose clients were mainly British, and North and South American.

After the State took over, the official currency (krona) plummeted and the stock market suspended its activity after a 76% collapse. Iceland was becoming bankrupt and to save the situation, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) injected U.S. $ 2,100 million and the Nordic countries helped with another 2,500 million.

Great little victories of ordinary people

While banks and local and foreign authorities were desperately seeking economic solutions, the Icelandic people took to the streets and their persistent daily demonstrations outside parliament in Reykjavik prompted the resignation of the conservative Prime Minister Geir H. Haarde and his entire government.

Citizens demanded, in addition, to convene early elections, and they succeeded. In April a coalition government was elected, formed by the Social Democratic Alliance and the Left Green Movement, headed by a new Prime Minister, Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir.

Throughout 2009 the Icelandic economy continued to be in a precarious situation (at the end of the year the GDP had dropped by 7%) but, despite this, the Parliament proposed to repay the debt to Britain and the Netherlands with a payment of 3,500 million Euros, a sum to be paid every month by Icelandic families for 15 years at 5.5% interest.

The move sparked anger again in the Icelanders, who returned to the streets demanding that, at least, that decision was put to a referendum. Another big small victory for the street protests: in March 2010 that vote was held and an overwhelming 93% of the population refused to repay the debt, at least with those conditions.

This forced the creditors to rethink the deal and improve it, offering 3% interest and payment over 37 years. Not even that was enough. The current president, on seeing that Parliament approved the agreement by a narrow margin, decided last month not to approve it and to call on the Icelandic people to vote in a referendum so that they would have the last word.

The bankers are fleeing in fear

Returning to the tense situation in 2010, while the Icelanders were refusing to pay a debt incurred by financial sharks without consultation, the coalition government had launched an investigation to determine legal responsibilities for the fatal economic crisis and had already arrested several bankers and top executives closely linked to high risk operations.

Interpol, meanwhile, had issued an international arrest warrant against Sigurdur Einarsson, former president of one of the banks. This situation led scared bankers and executives to leave the country en masse.

In this context of crisis, an assembly was elected to draft a new constitution that would reflect the lessons learned and replace the current one, inspired by the Danish constitution.

To do this, instead of calling experts and politicians, Iceland decided to appeal directly to the people, after all they have sovereign power over the law. More than 500 Icelanders presented themselves as candidates to participate in this exercise in direct democracy and write a new constitution. 25 of them, without party affiliations, including lawyers, students, journalists, farmers and trade union representatives were elected.

Among other developments, this constitution will call for the protection, like no other, of freedom of information and expression in the so-called Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, in a bill that aims to make the country a safe haven for investigative journalism and freedom of information, where sources, journalists and Internet providers that host news reporting are protected.

The people, for once, will decide the future of the country while bankers and politicians witness the transformation of a nation from the sidelines.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

What a rotten shame that Americans are too uninformed and cowardly to do the same thing as Iceland. But you can bet your ass they won’t miss their ballgames, and other forms of entertainment. Why should they study when they still have money for beer and hot-dogs? Dumb ass’s to the last breath!

 

Iceland Courage

 

 

New World Order Illuminati Conspiracy The Red Pill Course

June 19th, 2012 by

For Those Beginning To Figure Out That Something Is Very Wrong

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/06/15/new-world-order-illuminati-conspiracy

the-red-pill-course-for-those-beginning-to-figure-out-that-something-is-very-wrong/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A

+pakalert+%28Pak+Alert+Press%29

Posted by truther

There is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by 5.5 Billion people. While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it’s more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.

 

The Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used to refer to the 13 bloodline families (and their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this controlling elite. Most members of the Illuminati are also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive and occult societies which in many cases extend straight back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis) Illuminati structural pyramid include planning committees and organizations that the public has little or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the Illuminati pyramid include secretive committees with names such as: the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the Council of 7, the Council of 9, the Council of 13, the Council of 33, the Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300 (also called the “Olympians”) and the Committee of 500 among others.

In 1992, Dr John Coleman published  Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows:

  ”A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of  laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.”

educate-yourself.org/nwo/

The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and skepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with skepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London.

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

 

Conspiracy

“Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.”

June 13th, 2012 by

From: Michael Gaddy [mailto:montezumaconstitution@gmail.com]

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."~George Washington

This past week the folks up in Wisconsin lost their bid to recall their governor. Listening to the news concerning this event I was struck by the following statement: "…government will go from being our protector to being a supplicant…"

Do most of the citizens of this country have a clue what "government" is and what its natural evolution, as witnessed throughout history, shows it inevitably becomes? Obviously not, considering the wide margin of beliefs between what the "Father of our Country" knew government to be and the current idea, held by many, that government is "our protector."  There is a huge difference between a "fearful master" and a "protector" in reality.

When many don the uniform of our military, which many of us have done, do we swear a sacred oath to our government or our Constitution? The same holds true for all who take that oath before beginning "government" service. When our government defines those who believe in the tenets of our Constitution and Bill of Rights to be "potential domestic terrorists," who is our military protecting at that point; the object of their oaths or the government? Did the armies and bureaucracies of the Third Reich protect Hitler and his government or the people of Germany and their rights?

Government's never remain benign; their very nature is to metastasize, just like cancer, consuming freedoms and liberty until all they leave is a destroyed host. How is this accomplished? Invariably it is accomplished by passing laws and regulations which support government over the rights of the people. Robert Lefevre describes the process perfectly:

"Having granted that a government can perform a defensive function by apprehending and punishing the criminal, we must look at government on a broader scale.

It is immediately apparent that there is no government in all the world, saving only extremely small and local constabularies, which reserves for itself solely this simple and at least partially constructive function. The prevention of crime and the punishment of the criminal have become, in most instances, subsidiary departments of government. In the main, governments have gone far beyond this field of activity.

Today governments concern themselves in general not with criminals, but with law-abiding citizens. Every citizen is a victim of the aggressive tactics of government. Government begins by seizing the arbitrary and total power of deciding how much money it wants. Then it collects the money without a care or concern for the plight of the individual who must pay or be punished like a criminal.

Next, the government establishes hundreds and thousands of regulations which prescribe particular practices and proscribe others. Almost every action of every citizen has its legal "do’s" and "don't’s."

The list of prohibitions and compulsions is too lengthy for cataloguing here. But it pertains to business operations, licenses, building regulations, zoning, hours of employment, prices, trade, quotas, embargoes, subsidies, grants-in-aid, traffic, assembly, slander, libel, trespass, health, cleanliness, quality, quantity, method, education, indoctrination, propaganda, news, pictures, morals, food, drink, clothing, housing, sanitation, roads, farm products, transportation, search, seizure, mental outlook, exchange of parcels by post, and so on.

It can truthfully be said that there is almost no activity in which human beings engage which is free of legality. Think what you will, do what you will, there is a law somewhere which either compels, limits, or prohibits.

Try to think of something that people do. With the possible exception of breathing, laws bristle from the activity like quills from a porcupine. And the result of all these laws is to make any individual who does not conform in every respect, a lawbreaker.

Thus, the average person today, buttressed in by government, surrounded and overshadowed by government, finds himself a lawbreaker several times during an avenge day. And this fact turns him from being a law-abiding citizen into a lawbreaking citizen and equates him with any criminal who, in fact, breaks a law with aggressive intent.

But the government, as has been shown, cannot concern itself with anything but the universal obedience it must enforce. Thus, any violation of law becomes in essence a punishable offense. And whereas the government does maintain certain classifications — civil, criminal, and the like — the fact remains that even in civil matters government can and will punish and apprehend with vigor. This is not the fault of government. This is the nature of government.

This is the major point which must be understood eventually. Government which passes and enforces endless rules and codes is not out of character when it does so. It is in character. That is the way any government operates. And the longer a given government endures, the more numerous will be the laws it enacts. It is the business of government to pass laws and to enforce them. These laws are the productive sum of all governmental effort. Therefore, it is not to be wondered at when thousands and thousands of new laws come into existence every year. It would rather be a marvel if this did not happen.

Government is a law factory. It passes laws in the same manner that another type of factory extrudes metal molding. Government is a lawmaking tool.

But, whereas a factory which extrudes metal molding is providing a product which is useful to the citizens generally, and which certain citizens will purchase voluntarily; the government factory extrudes compulsion which is useful principally to the government, itself, but is purchased in advance by the people, who are never in a position to refuse to buy."

At some point in time, the realization that our military is not defending our freedoms, but is in fact facilitating the growth of government and the proliferation of liberty destroying laws and regulations must be acknowledged by a majority of the people if we are to recover any of the rights supposedly guaranteed in our Bill of Rights.

The National Defense Authorization Act does not protect the people but allows the government to use the military against the people if those in government feel threatened. Governments, in reality, never protect the people, but they will use deadly force to protect their existence and right to oppress and control.

In Liberty

Mike

FORCE

 

NOTICE THERE ARE NO JUDGES!

June 12th, 2012 by

 

 

Shhh…these folks do not know….that there has never been a Constitutional federal republic…it was a flim-flam…SURPRISE!!    

Reporting.
R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences
Freelance Investigative Science Reporter since 1996 

 

The extension of federal law beyond federal territory by federal territorial officers is causing an unnecessary conflict with the implementation of California’s Compassionate Use Act.   Concerned Californians are filing judicial misconduct complaints against federal district court judges in order to have them removed from their offices.  

"BY THE WAY, iF you do a FOIA on the judges in that court, you will find that all of them have a Form 61 stating that they are in fact all "Employees of the  United States ."    You can't be an employee and also an "Officer of the  United States " under Article 2 Section 2 Clause 2.   You must have an Office created by law (Congress).  Their purported Civil Commission is in the Dept. of Justice, it should be in the Secretary of State's office under the seal of the  United States , but it is under the seal of the DoJ."

NOTICE – THERE ARE NO JUDGES

STATEMENT OF FACTS

United States district court Judge A.B. Fair

This sample judicial misconduct complaint made against the  United States district court judge named above is filed, in accordance with the Ninth Circuit Rules of the Judicial Council only for the purpose of demonstrating the official Title 28 U.S.C. judicial misconduct complaint process. Actual complaints should only be made after consulting the rules governing such complaints.  This sample complaint exceeds the five page limitation on the Statement of Facts imposed by the Ninth Circuit Rules.  Each circuit has different rules.  Those rules are available from the Clerk’s Office of the Circuit Court with jurisdiction over the judge subject to complaint.  Rules for the Ninth Circuit can also be accessed on the Internet: http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/misconduct   To access the other circuits try inserting the number of the circuit you want in place of the 9.in this link: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov  

Complainant charges that this territorial district judge, who claims to be an Article III judge, has committed an impeachable offense for failing to reside within the district to which he was appointed in violation of Section 134 Title 28 U.S.C. and for violation of Section 2384 Title 18 U.S.C. by conspiring with others “to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States.”   The recent death of Judge William Matthew Byrne, Jr. revealed that he resided in the Los Feliz area of  Los Angeles , while a district judge.  The resignation of Judge Nora Margaret Manella caused the Los Angeles Times to reveal her  Studio  City residence in a news story.  The Torrance Daily Breeze identified Judge Manuel L. Real as a Rancho Palos Verdes resident.  These district judges, as well as all other federal district judges in the 50 states have violated §134 Title 28 U.S.C. by not residing within the judicial district to which he or she had been appointed. 

The District of California cannot be both the federal territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress on  January 1, 1945 and the territory that is not subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress.  The territory that comprises the District of California must be one or the other.  Any place in any one of the 50 states is, similarly, either subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress or it is not.  From the very beginning Congress viewed the creation of genuine Article III courts as a threat to its own power, so it created none.  Congress did make it possible for district court judges to act like Article III judges and did nothing when they lived outside the district to which they had been appointed.  The first district courts and today’s  United States district court for the District of California are legislative courts that Congress must pass off as an Article III judicial court to extend its territorial jurisdiction beyond federal territory.  Californiadistrict judges claim to be Article III judges despite taking an obvious territorial oath.   To complete the deception, the United States Congress, the United States Department of Justice and district judges of the District of California have conspired to remove the high misdemeanor penalty from Section 134 Title 28 U.S.C., so that the public will not be aware that failure to reside in the judicial district is still an impeachable crime for a district judge.   The purpose of this complaint is to expose the factual basis of the conspiracy to prevent, hinder or delay the application of the residency requirement to  United States district judges and United States Attorneys.

Section 84 lacks a critical factor—a date to mark it either as a Sixth Amendment district “previously ascertained by law” or to identify the federal territory subject to Article IV disposition by Congress.   The first and the most important sentence in Chapter 5 of Title 28 U.S.C. supplies that date and is an announcement that the sections that follow are to be descriptive of the federal territory that comprises the district: “Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of  January 1, 1945 .”  The 52 sections consist of 48 States, the District, the two territories of  Alaska and  Hawaii and  Puerto Rico .  The date:  January 1, 1945 does not subject the judicial district to the Sixth Amendment because the district is made up exclusively of federal territory.   

The territorial composition of the districts and divisions is determined by finding territory that can be common to States, the District, territory and the  Commonwealth of  Puerto Rico as of a certain date.  By random substitution we can determine that the only territory common to all is federal territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress. State territory, it will be seen, must be excluded as any part of a federal judicial district or division because Puerto Ricoand the two territories had no State territory on  January 1, 1945 .  The  District of Columbia was created from State territory, but  Puerto Rico and the territories can contain no such territory. 

Judge Fair was obligated to presume under the authority of Foley Bros. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949) that the territorial composition of §84 was territorial.  Based on that presumption his residence outside federal territory violated federal residency law once he took a territorial oath of office.  Upon entering his office, he began an active conspiracy with the other judges and magistrates of the district, the United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorneys for the District of California to conceal his residence outside the judicial district to which he had been appointed.  Knowing that he had not taken an oath for an Article VI “Office or public Trust under the United States,” he proceeded to act as if he was an Article III judicial officer and that he resided within the District of California.  He knew or should have known that he was a territorial officer and did not reside within federal territory in  California .   He could only carry out this deception in an active conspiracy with the  United States Attorney and other conspirators.

 The first act of the First Congress was to create an oath that conformed to the requirements of Article VI of the Constitution, 1 Stat. 23, 24.   Congress enacted a different oath containing a religious test for the Chief Justice, Associate Justices and district judges, 1 Stat. 76, that did not conform to the no religious test requirements of Article VI.  The oath and religious test enacted and imposed on the federal judiciary by Congress clearly set the Justices and judges apart from any Office or public Trust under the  United States .  The federal judicial oath precludes the holding of an Office or public Trust under Article III of the Constitution.  Federal judges must find authority in Article I or Article IV and only Article IV can provide the territory for a Chapter 5 Title 28 U.S.C. judicial district or division.  

Section 134 of Title 28 U.S.C., which is based on Section 1 of the 1940 edition of the United States Code requires all the district judges of State of the Republic to reside within the district to which they have been appointed and provides that it is a high misdemeanor for not doing so.  As the Sixth Amendment requires a district previously ascertained by law and one subject to the Constitution and Bill of Rights, Judge Fair had an additional duty to determine the territorial composition of the district before he accepted the appointment of  United States district court judge.   The public is keenly aware of the loss of rights, which are supposed to be guaranteed by the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  The public lost those and more when Judge Fair conspired with others to conceal the fact that Section 84 identified a district comprised entirely of federal territory that is subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress.  

Judge Fair should not be permitted to claim that he merely assumed that the District of California was all of California .  He and the other Central District of California district judges had a duty to identify a district that conforms to law in all respects.  He, especially, had to conform the district to the requirements of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.  Judge Fair did none of this.  Section 2(b) of the Act of 1948, 62 Stat 985 provided that the Judiciary Act of 1948 would be a continuation of existing law in order to conform that act to statute law.  Since the Judiciary Act of 1789, the judicial districts have consistently been composed of federal territory.  

There can be no other conclusion: Judge Fair is a criminal with respect to §134 and he continues to be a criminal every moment that he fails or refuses to reside within the judicial district to which he was appointed.  He remains a member of a criminal conspiracy  “to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the  United States ,” as long as he fails or refuses to disclose the true character of the California Judicial District.   

There is no easy way to correct the injustices caused by Judge Fair, however, they must not be allowed to continue.  Corrections are possible only to the judges now in office.*   Judge Fair had a duty to make his own determination of what parts of the counties comprised the district and he chose to accept assumptions of what the district is rather than determine for himself the district previously ascertained by law.  He must not be allowed to excuse his criminality by claiming that he merely relied on the assumptions made by others.          

In 1789, when the U.S. Supreme Court and district courts were first organized, the concept of “the Territory and other Property belonging to the United States was so important that that Congress was able to create a government around its disposition.  Congress was responsible for vast tracts of land not part of any state and for maritime and admiralty laws in the coastal states.  The requirement that district judges reside within the federal territory that comprised the district to which they had been appointed is found in Section 3 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and appears in Section 1 Title 28 U.S.C. of the 1940 Code.  Congress made the violation of the residency requirement a high misdemeanor, when it enacted Chapter V.An Act concerning the District and Territorial Judges of the United States on  December 18, 1812 , 2 Stat 788.   Today, the residence of a district judge in a federal enclave is practically an impossibility.  To satisfy the § 134 residency requirements, federal district judges would have to reside within national parks as some United States magistrate judges are required, pursuant to § 631 (b) (3) Title 28 U.S.C.   

It is certain that no district court judge anywhere complies with the residence requirement that district judges reside on federal territory located within his or his district.  No federal judges of the District of California can comply with the federal residency laws because there is no suitable residence available within any district or division.  Congress has not repealed the residency requirement, but the House of Representatives and the law revisers have conspired with the federal judiciary and the United States Department of Justice to remove the high misdemeanor penalty editorially.  The past success of the law revisers and other conspirators suggests an established and elaborate congressional policy to concoct legislative protections for district court judges violating federal residency requirements. Removing the penalty from the Code did not repeal the law that established the penalty; judges will still be subject to impeachment.  

The §134 Historical and Revision Note in the current Title 28 U.S.C. claims Congress did not intend that the high misdemeanor penalty apply to the residence requirement.  No support for the alleged Congressional intention is provided, but the assertion is made in the note that the penalty attached to a district judge’s residency at the time of the 1878 compilation of the Revised Statutes.  That assertion is a pure fabrication because section 551 of the Revised Statutes continues the residency requirement within the district and continues the high misdemeanor designation for the crime of failing to  reside within the district.  References to the Judiciary Act of 1789 and the  December 18, 1812 act in Sec. 551 in Title XIII. should completely dispose of the reviser’s claim that the high misdemeanor penalty was only meant to attach to the unauthorized practice of law in 1878.  This totally inaccurate claim is continuing evidence of the conspiracy to “to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the  United States .”  

Without exception the federal district judges of  California have refused or have otherwise failed to reside on federal territory within the counties of the State that comprise the district.  District judges who have violated and who continue to violate Section 134 cannot possibly administer the business of their court in an effective and expeditious manner.  The  United States district court judge named above has engaged in and is now engaging in conduct that has been a crime since 1812.  What can be more prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts than the totally inaccurate determination of the territorial jurisdiction of the court?  Once aware of his criminal violation of federal law, the district judge must act positively to stop violating the law.

The fact that there is no statutory evidence that any  United States district court in  California has been ordained and established pursuant to Article III of the Constitution is consistent with all that is known about the district courts and judges that predate  California ’s federal courts.  That additional fact makes it conclusive that Judge Fair is a territorial officer who is misusing his authority to extend federal law beyond the jurisdiction of the federal district court to which he was appointed. 

A district court judge’s appointment during good behavior is statutory and it requires continual good behavior.   The failure or refusal to reside within the district to which he was appointed violated the oath of his office and §134.  The business of all the federal district courts is limited to their territorial jurisdiction and the judge named above is criminally liable because he must have been aware of his court’s territorial jurisdiction and he conspired to conceal it.  Federal law makes him criminally liable for the knowledge that his court and jurisdiction is limited to the federal territory within the counties that comprise the district and its divisions.   United States Marshals are providing personal security for  United States district court judges who are in violation of federal residence laws.  Judge Fair may be liable for the costs of such security because it was not provided within the judicial district to a person authorized to receive it.

            Section 545 of Title 28 U.S.C. requires each United States Attorney to reside in the district for which he or she is appointed, except for certain exceptions in the  District of Columbia and the District of New York.  Federal grand and petit jurors must, according to Section 1865 of Title 28 U.S.C., be residents of the judicial district for one full year.  How can a federal district judge determine if a grand or petit juror has resided in the district for a year if he or she is in violation of the same residency requirement?  How can any United States district court judge in active violation of the federal residency requirement participate in the preparation of a written plan for the selection of grand and petit jurors if that judge has been effectively given immunity from prosecution for violation of those same residency requirements by a United States Attorney who is violating the same kind of law?  Such violations of federal law cannot be permitted in any United States district court judge no matter how long his tenure.              

It is a matter of historical fact that Section 2 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 enacted on September 24th of that year, provided “that the United States shall be, and they hereby are divided into thirteen districts,” when two States, North Carolina and Rhode Island had not yet ratified the Constitution.  Section 1 of the Act, therefore, created a Supreme Court for theunincorporated territory in the federal territory of the eleven states that had ratified the Constitution and the two federal districts,  Maine and  Kentucky .   Section 2. created the first  United States district courts for the federal territory within the eleven states that had ratified the Constitution up to that time and for the territories of  Maine and  Kentucky .   Maine was territory until it was admitted as the 23rd State of the  Union on  March 15, 1820 .  During the time that the District Court of Maine operated as a territorial district court, Congress declared the violation of the residency requirement to be a high misdemeanor, an impeachable offense.   Kentucky didn’t become the 15th State of the  Union until  June 1, 1792 , so up to its date of admission into the  Union the District of Kentucky was a territory without State sovereignty, incapable of exercising Article III judicial power. 

It is a fact, therefore, that prior to their respective dates of admission to the  Union , the territorial composition of the two federal courts in  Maine and  Kentucky were all federal territory within the two federal States’ exterior boundaries.   The two judicial districts consisted of territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress.  It must follow, therefore, that the U.S. Supreme Court and the other district courts created by the Judiciary Act of 1789 were not ordained andestablished pursuant to Article III of the Constitution, because the territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of Congress constituted the territory that comprised the judicial districts of those district courts.

Every judiciary act and judicial code

since the first has confirmed the composition of the districts and divisions to be the federal territory to be found within the state or counties that comprise the districts and divisions.  The Judiciary Act of 1911 uses the date:  July 1, 1910 to reckon the territorial composition of the districts and divisions.  The Judiciary Act of 1948 uses the date:  January 1, 1945 for the same purpose and, of course, to conform the district to the requirements of the Sixth Amendment.  That amendment requires the district to be previously ascertained by law.  The official residence of the judge, jurors,  U.S. Attorney and Marshal must be in federal territory not because of anything in the Bill of Rights, but because law enacted pursuant to the exclusive legislative power of Congress can only be applied on or in  United States territory

Judge Fair is unable to perform a constitutional Article III function because he has sworn a territorial oath and has functioned as a federal territorial judge for about twelve [?] years.  He cannot qualify to be a territorial judge because he cannot reside on any federal territory within the district.  Congress in 1804 impeached John Pickering, the first district judge to be charged and removed from office, to support the erroneous belief that district judges were Article III officers serving during good behavior.  District judges, however, were first entitled by statute to serve during good behavior by the Judiciary Act of 1948 and are subject to “Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” only because of that statutory appointment during good behavior.   There is incontrovertible evidence of a conspiracy to commit a high misdemeanor and to “to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the  United States .”  It is obvious that the  December 18, 1812 residency requirement serves an important purpose evidenced by the still valid high misdemeanor penalty.   The penalty has remained in all the judicial codes since that time until 1946, when the law revisers conspired with the federal judiciary to remove the penalty from the written law.  The true state of congressional intent is its  failure to repeal the penalty for not residing within the district.  It is past time to apply the law that still exists. Impeachment of Judge Fair is necessary simply because there may be no other way to terminate the conspiracy to violate the federal residency laws.

The extension of federal law beyond federal territory by federal territorial officers is causing an unnecessary conflict with the implementation of California’s Compassionate Use Act.   Concerned Californians are filing judicial misconduct complaints against federal district court judges in order to have them removed from their offices.  While the federal judicial misconduct complaint process is being pursued, I ask that you, as an elected official, ask the California State Attorney General for his opinion of the impact of the federal law set out in this sample complaint.

 

  • How about removing the Chemarin's five (5) MILLION dollar retirement fund, the Slush Fund?

 

BY THE WAY, iF you do a FOIA on the judges in that court, you will find that all of them have a Form 61 stating that they are in fact all "Employees of the  United States ."    You can't be an employee and also an "Officer of the  United States " under Article 2 Section 2 Clause 2.   You must have an Office created by law (Congress).  Their purported Civil Commission is in the Dept. of Justice, it should be in the Secretary of State's office under the seal of the  United States , but it is under the seal of the DoJ.

 

 

Richard Nixon, if he were alive today, might take bittersweet satisfaction to know that he was not the last smart president to prolong unjustifiably a senseless, unwinnable war, at great cost in human life. … He would probably also feel vindicated (and envious) that ALL the crimes he committed against me–which forced his resignation facing impeachment–are now legal," – Daniel Ellsberg.

 "The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.''

CAHA v.  U.S. , 152  U.S.  211 (1894)

See the whole decision:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=152&invol=211

 

When Injustice becomes law, Rebellion becomes duty

Just Click on this link to join or listen to the show, including the archives!!

!!!!The American Reconstruction Project!!!!

Hosted by: Jack Bauer

Saturday's: 6pm to 8pm Pacific, 9pm to 11pm Eastern.

How can you participate????

Call in:
(724) 444-7444
Call ID: 74235#

On your phone keypad:
*6 to mute on *6 again to mute off, Press *8 to raise your hand to ask a question.

NO JUDGES

 

24 Percent of Americans Believe States Have a Right to Secede

June 7th, 2012 by

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/poll-24-percent-americans-believe-states-have-right-secede

By Elizabeth Harrington

Subscribe to Elizabeth Harrington's posts

(CNSNews.com) – Nearly one-quarter of Americans believe that states have the right to secede, according to a recent poll from Rasmussen Reports — up 10 percentage points in two years.

The latest poll is just one of many that shows that Americans have “serious and growing concern about the federal government,” according to Scott Rasmussen, founder and president of Rasmussen Reports.

According to the phone survey released Sunday, 24 percent of Americans believe that states should be able to withdraw from the United States to form their own country, if they want. Nearly 60 percent (59) of Americans say they don’t believe states have the right to secede, while 16 percent are undecided.

“We do see that people are concerned about the federal government in a variety of ways,” Rasmussen told CNSNews.com. “51 percent believe that it’s a threat to individual liberties.

“It may just be part of a growing frustration with other aspects of the federal government,” he said.

“But I think it’s important to keep it in perspective, growing to 24 percent still means that only one out of four Americans think that states have the right to secede, it’s not that they’re advocating for it,” Rasmussen said.

Though a minority, the number has been growing.  In 2010, when Rasmussen first conducted the poll, only 14 percent of Americans said states had the right to secede.  A year later, the number was up to 21 percent.

The poll, which surveyed 1,000 adults between May 29 and 30, asked, among other questions: “Do individual states have the right to leave the United States and form an independent country?”

Only 10 percent of poll respondents said it was likely a state would attempt to secede in the next 25 years — “a pretty generous time frame,” Rasmussen said.  “So it’s not seen as a very realistic possibility,” he added.

The survey also asked whether the federal government is a protector or a threat to individual rights, to which a majority — 51 percent — said the government presents a danger to liberty.

“[O]nly 34 percent of adults in this country regard the federal government more as a protector of individual rights,” according to the poll.

“More Americans than ever are expressing strong concern that the federal government will run out of money,” according to Rasmussen Reports, whoalso found that 64 percent of Americans are at least somewhat worried that the U.S. government will run out of money.  43 percent are “very worried” that the U.S. government will run out of money, while 31 percent of adults are not worried and 10 percent are “not at all worried.”

The total federal debt currently stands at $15.8 trillion.

Rasmussen told CNSNews.com that recent polling shows that Americans have a “growing frustration” with the federal government.

“What we’re seeing in a whole range of surveys is serious and growing concern about the federal government, about the role of government in American life,” he said.  “Only about one out of five Americans believe the government today has the consent of the governed.  People believe that America’s best days — about half the nation believes — America’s best days have come and gone.”

“Only 16 percent believe that today’s children will be better off than their parents,” he said, “that’s a horrifically low number for America.”

“And then you’ve got individual proposals, [New York City] Mayor [Michael] Bloomberg’s proposal of banning large sugary drinks is supported by 24 percent of Americans, 2 out of 3 oppose it,” Rasmussen added.  “So there’s this frustration that’s been building.”

Top of Form

CNSNews.com is not funded by the government like NPR. CNSNews.com is not funded by the government like PBS. 

CNSNews.com relies on individuals like you to help us report the news the liberal media distort and ignore. Please make a tax-deductible gift to CNSNews.com today. Your continued support will ensure that CNSNews.com is here reporting THE TRUTH, for a long time to come. It's fasteasy and secure.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

After all these years of brain washing by Federal involvement in public education, there are few people left in America who really understand the reasons for secession prior to the civil war, or the fact that the same reasons are being repeated today. Googling (Secession) will bring up 782,189 hits, but depending on your prior knowledge of the truth, you may or may not be willing to learn it. Most solid attempts have given up due to the ignorance of the majority, and their unwillingness to fight for their freedom, but some of us remain, and will never accept the slavery imposed on us by the federal government. Most American born citizens are addicted to the federal hand-outs, and desire their ignorance as protection for their so-called benefits.

Americans with the courage to remain free from tyrannical government, are loyal to the original intent of the Constitution, and support free States with their own sovereignty, which is the only way to avoid the accumulation of power over government by the international Bankers who are responsible for all of Americas woes, except for the lack of back-bone in the citizens. Mayer Amschel Rothschild said many years ago, “ Let me issue and control a Nation’s currency, and I care not who make’s it’s laws”, and by God he was right!

 

SECESSION

 

America In Decline The New Paradigm of Lowered Expectations

June 6th, 2012 by

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/06/america-in-decline-new-paradigm-of.html

 

Michael Snyder, Contributor
Activist Post

All over America tonight there are people that believe that their lives are over. When you do everything that you know how to do to get a job and you still can't get one it can be absolutely soul crushing. If you have ever been unemployed for an extended period of time you know exactly what I am talking about. When you have been unemployed for month after month it can be very tempting to totally cut yourself off from society. Those that are kind will look at you with pity and those that are cruel will treat you as though you are a total loser.

It doesn't matter that America is in decline and that our economy is not producing nearly enough jobs for everyone anymore. In our society, one of the primary things that defines our lives is what we do for a living. Just think about it. When you are out in a social situation, what is one of the very first things that people ask? They want to know what you "do". Well, if you don't "do" anything, then you are not part of the club. But the worst part of being unemployed for many Americans is the relentless pressure from family and friends. Often they have no idea how hard it is to find a job in this economy – especially if they still have jobs. Sometimes the pressure becomes too great.

Sadly, we are seeing unemployment break up a lot of marriages in America today. Things are really hard out there right now. A very large number of highly educated Americans have taken very low-paying service jobs in recent years just so that they can have some money coming in even as they "look for something else". Unfortunately, in many cases that "something else" never materializes. In the past, America was "the land of opportunity" where anything was possible. But today America has become "the land of lowered expectations" and the worst is yet to come.

We live during a time when "the American Dream" is literally being redefined. In the old days, just about anyone could get a good job that would pay enough to make it possible to buy a house, buy a nice car and raise a family.

Unfortunately, those days are long gone. The following is from a recent NPR article….

The town of Lorain, Ohio, used to embody this dream. It was a place where you could get a good job, raise a family and comfortably retire. 

'Now you can see what it is. Nothing,' says John Beribak. 'The shipyards are gone, the Ford plant is gone, the steel plant is gone.' His voice cracks as he describes the town he's lived in his whole life. 

'I mean, I grew up across the street from the steel plant when there was 15,000 people working there,' he says. 'My dad worked there. I worked there when I got out of the Air Force. It's just sad.'

We live in an economy that is in serious decline. In this environment no job is safe. In fact, even Goldman Sachs is laying off workers these days.

Millions of Americans are suffering from deep depression because they can't find jobs. Many of them are sitting at home right now blankly starting at their television screens as they wonder why nobody wants to hire them. Some have been unemployed for years and have sent out thousands upon thousands of resumes. The following is from a recent article by J.P. Hicks….

I have a brilliant cousin with a $180K Syracuse education working part-time at a department store. She has literally sent out 38,000 resumes in the span of a year to no avail. I have another very bright friend with the kindest heart who is so desperate he has applied for dishwashing jobs and didn’t get them, sending him deeper into depression. I’m sure we all know people like this, or perhaps have even been there ourselves. 

Society has trained us to believe that we are worthless without a job. Indeed, we feel worthless when we are unemployed with few prospects of making money. Family, friends, and peers constantly remind us in subtle and not-so-subtle ways that we 'need' a job.

Have you ever been unemployed?

How did it make you feel?

How were you treated by your family and friends?

In the old days, a college education was almost a guaranteed ticket to the middle class.

But these days, a college education guarantees you absolutely nothing.

As a recent article by Jed Graham detailed, most young unemployed workers in America today have at least some college education….

For the first time in history, the number of jobless workers age 25 and up who have attended some college now exceeds the ranks of those who settled for a high school diploma or less. 

Out of 9 million unemployed in April, 4.7 million had gone to college or graduated and 4.3 million had not, seasonally adjusted Labor Department data show.

Overall, 53 percent of all Americans with a bachelor's degree under the age of 25 were either unemployed or underemployed last year.

It is tough to tell young college graduates with their whole lives ahead of them that they need to lower their expectations because America is in decline.

So where did all the jobs go?

Well, one place they went is overseas. Over the past couple of decades, millions upon millions of good jobs have left the United States and have gone over to the other side of the world.

That is why you see gleaming new factories going up all over China even while our once great manufacturing cities are turning intocrime-infested warzones.

But as a recent WND article reported, the WTO has a solution. They plan to replace "Made in China" labels with "Made in the World" labels so that we don't feel so bad about losing our jobs and our economic infrastructure…

The World Trade Organization is moving closer to eliminating country-of-origin labels and replacing them with 'Made in the World' initiative labels because they say we need to 'reduce public opposition to free trade' and 're-engineer global governance.'

As the number of middle-class jobs has steadily declined in recent years, the number of low paying service jobs has increased.

In a previous article, I discussed how approximately one out of every four U.S. workers now makes $10 an hour or less.

Could your family survive on 10 dollars an hour?

Today, you can find hordes of very smart, very talented Americans flipping burgers, waiting tables and welcoming people to Wal-Mart.

Sadly, the United States now has a higher percentage of workers doing low wage work than any other major industrialized nation does.

Perhaps we should applaud our leaders for doing such a great job of destroying the American Dream.

Because so many Americans are working crappy jobs, a very large percentage of them have absolutely no savings to speak of.

According to one survey, 42 percent of all American workers live paycheck to paycheck.

I am constantly encouraging people to save up an "emergency fund" that will enable them to pay their bills for at least 6 months if they suddenly become unemployed.

Unfortunately, for many Americans that is simply not possible. Way too many families are just barely scraping by from month to month.

Another area of the economy where Americans are facing lowered expectations is in housing.

In the old days, most Americans dreamed of owning their own homes.

But today we are being told that things have changed. For example, a recent USA Today article was entitled "Home rentals — the new American Dream?"….

Steve and Jodi Jacobson bought their Phoenix-area 'dream home' in 2005. They built flagstone steps to the front door. They tiled the kitchen and bathroom. They entertained often, enjoying their mountain views. 

'We put our soul into that house,' says Steve Jacobson, 37. 

Then, home prices tanked more than 50%. Steve, a software quality assurance engineer, suffered pay cuts. In 2010, foreclosure claimed the home and their $100,000 down payment. 

The Jacobsons didn't lose their desire to live in a single-family home, however. They now rent one, like many other former homeowners displaced by foreclosure.

Is that what we are supposed to tell future generations of Americans?

"Listen Johnny and Suzie, if you work really, really hard at your minimum wage jobs perhaps someday you will be able to rent a home that has been foreclosed by a big, greedy bank".

It is so sad to watch what is happening to this country.

These days many Americans are scratching and clawing and doing everything that they can to make it, but they still find themselves short on money at the end of the month.

Many are turning to debt in an attempt to bridge the gap. According to CNN, 40 percent of "low- and middle-income households" are using credit cards to pay for basic living expenses.

Overall, U.S. consumers have more than 11 trillion dollars in debt right now.

That is an incredible number.

As the economy has declined, a lot of families have completely given up trying to make it on their own and have turned to the U.S. government for financial help. Today, an astounding 49.1 percent of all Americans live in a home where at least one person receives government benefits.

Just think about that number for a while. It is one of the clearest signs that America is in deep, deep decline.

Unfortunately, things are about to get even worse. The next wave of the financial crisis is unfolding in Europe and we will all be talking about another "major global recession" very soon.

That means that unemployment in the United States is going to get a lot worse.

For the millions upon millions of Americans that are already suffering through the horror of unemployment, that is really bad news.

 

ECONOMIC COLLAPSE

 

NWO SYSTEM FAILURE BILDERBERG !

June 5th, 2012 by

Interesting – this guy (listed below as a Bilderberg member) was on O’Reilly tonight: USA Goolsbee, Austan D. Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business

“Power is a curious thing… It’s a trick. A shadow on the wall"

This year the meetings in Chantilly runs through June 4.
Most of the group’s meetings are in Europe.

Wouldn't it be satisfying if the energy being put in to help sort out our misdirected world could turn things around?
It would be comforting to think so but realistically the banks, corporate media and other transnational corporations, the merger maniacal 'dark side', are extending their monopolistic control.

The modern transnational corporation is an immortal, soulless collusion of greed that reduces everything it touches to a dollar value. In law a corporation is a person, able to own property and resources just as a person can only, it
seems, not responsible for the deaths it causes. The present 'War on Terror' is a fraudulent attempt to create a new Moslem enemy, much like the attack on the Jew's in the 1930's. Nato and many Western Military masters are following the same tactics as Hitler's Nazis.

Said David Rockefeller, “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for many years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

Council on Foreign Relations
published and released today 6/2/12
Clinton's Remarks with Danish Foreign Minister Sovndal, May 2012
Clinton's Remarks at the Global Health Summit, June 2012
Why Iran Talks Will Continue
The State of the World’s Refugees: From Indifference to Solidarity (Video)
The State of the World’s Refugees: From Indifference to Solidarity (Audio)
Advancing Human Rights in the UN System
Clinton's Remarks at the Green Partnership for Growth Launch, May 2012
Ambassador Rice's Remarks on Syria, May 2012
http://www.cfr.org/

THE WEST’S SECRET POWER GROUP
In this world exclusive (by Robert Eringer), VERDICT reveals for the first time the activities of this
secret group and the names of the powerful men behind it. “The world is governed by very different
personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Those words were written
by Benjamin Disraeli, empire-building Prime Minister of Great Britain, over a hundred years ago.
http://recolumns.blogspot.com/2010/10/wests-secret-power-group.html

Bilderberg: The Secret Society that Rules Us
Bilderberg, named after the Dutch hotel where members first met in 1954, brings together some of the most influential figures on Earth. More than 120 top-level officials in government, banking, media, finance, business, think-tanks, armed forces, and even European royalty attend the confab every year. According to James P. Tucker, Jr., of American Free Press, Bilderberg is the most exclusive and secretive club in the world. To be admitted, you have to own a multinational bank, a multinational corporation or a country. The Bilderbergers have often been called “the shadow government”, the scene behind the scene. The “inner circle”, or the Advisory Group, includes Giovanni Agnelli of Italy, Eric Roll of Ipsden from Great Britain, David Rockefeller of the USA and Otto Wolff von Amerongen of Germany.
http://subversify.com/2011/06/17/bilderberg-the-secret-society-that-rules-us/

Must see biblically based site
Tony Gosling website editor
http://www.bilderberg.org/tonyhom.htm
http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm

Freemasons: The silent destroyers
– deist religious cult based on the Knights Templar …
http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm

Must read page
The New World Order (NWO) An Overview
In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows: "A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population. […]
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/

So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that
look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
Hebrews 9:28 KJV

Bilderberg Live Stream !
http://www.ustream.tv/embed/6106473

Also here …
http://12160.info/group/occup-bilderberg-2012?xg_source=msg_mes_network

http://OccupyBilderberg.org/

Must read post …
See who's busting Bilderberg wide open
Over 1,000 protesters, pair of news hounds show up to expose truth

CHANTILLY, Va. – An intense and amplified police presence outside the Westfields Marriott Convention Center greeted the more than 1,000 protestors of the Bilderberg Conference on Day 3 of the secret conclave that gathers global leaders of finance and government. On a related note, Wired.com reported that the Pentagon pulled out of working on “The Avengers” film, because they couldn’t ascertain who the fictional, multinational peace-keeping organization answered to. “We couldn’t reconcile the unreality of this international organization and our place in it,” Phil Strub, the Defense Department’s Hollywood liaison, told Wired.com. “To whom did S.H.I.E.L.D. answer?
Did we work for S.H.I.E.L.D.? We hit that roadblock and decided we couldn’t do anything [with the film].”

“That is the ultimate goal of Bilderberg, the end of American sovereignty and the implementation of a globalist elite that controls every aspect of your life,” said Jones, who despite being drenched in sweat, seemed to be gaining
energy as the protests went on.

7 minute WND interview of Alex Jones …
WNDTV catches up with Alex Jones of Infowars on Day 3 of the Bilderberger Conference protests.
Bilderberg 2012 — Alex Jones interview with WND
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZLbdv1uQ0w

Daniel Estulin, author of “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” contends the idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting “is to create what they themselves call the aristocracy of purpose between European and
North American elites on the best way to manage the planet.” “In other words,” Estulin told WND in an email exchange in which he answered questions, “the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity.”

Four years ago there were rumors that Barack Obama had been picked as the Democratic presidential nominee. Two days after the event, Hillary Clinton bowed out. […]
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/see-whos-busting-bilderberg-wide-open/

The Intel Hub will be providing LIVE updates and streaming video footage on our U-Stream channel, as well as uploading content fresh to YouTube and providing real-time updates on theintelhub.com’s main page and the Bilderberg 2012 page.

Here are some of The Intel Hub’s official links:

Our Official Website: http://www.theintelhub.com

Our Official Bilderberg 2012 Page: http://theintelhub.com/bilderberg-2012/

Our Official U-Stream Channel: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/11088505

Our Official YouTube Channel:http://www.youtube.com/user/NotForSale2NWO

Our Official Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/IntelHub

Shepard’s Official Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/notforsale2nwo

Bilderberg 2012: Itinerary and Radio Appearances (Updated)
http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/26/bilderberg-2012-itinerary-and-radio-appearances/

Exclusive Photos: Bilderberg Attendees Revealed
http://theintelhub.com/2012/06/01/exclusive-photos-bilderberg-attendees-revealed/

Bilderberg 2012 Official Participant List
http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/31/bilderberg-2012-official-participant-list/

Note: If you are a broadcaster or radio host and would like an appearance or live updates by one of our crew on your show please contact us.

* This has all been made possible by reader donations and our sponsors. PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!

As you may already know we will be covering the Bilderberg meeting and protests in Chantilly Virginia (Westfields Marriott) Between Thursday, May 31st and Sunday June 2nd.

The Intel Hub will be providing LIVE updates and streaming video footage on our U-Stream channel, as well as uploading
content fresh to YouTube and providing real-time updates on theintelhub.com’s main page and the Bilderberg 2012 page.

We have our own battle plan for providing you the best coverage throughout the entire meeting, protests, and events.
Shepard Ambellas (the Founder & director of The Intel Hub and former Host of The Official Intel Hub Radio Show) & Jason (The Infowarrior) Bermas will be conducting live TV and radio interviews on location as well as appearing on nationally syndicated and internet radio shows including but not limited to appearances on (listed in order by times scheduled);

Dangerous Conversation (With Scotty “Ledge” Ledger – May 30th (8 pm)
The Power Hour (Hosted by Joyce Riley) – May 31 (7:30 am EST), June 4
The Jack Blood Show – (Hosted by Jack Blood) – May 31, June 1 (10 am EST)
The Truther Girls – (Hosted by Sonia & Natasha) – May 31 (2 pm EST)
X-Squared Radio – (Hosted by Brooks Agnew) – May 31
The Bob Tuskin Radio Show – May 31 (8 pm EST), June 1 (8:30 pm EST)
Ground Zero Radio – (Hosted by Clyde Lewis) – May 31, June 1
Rense Radio – (Hosted by Jeff Rense) – May 31
Blacklisted Radio – (Hosted By Doug Owen) – June 1 (7 pm EST)
Collision Course – (Hosted by Francis Walsh) – June 1 (8 pm EST)
Truth Frequency Radio – (Hosted by Chris Geo & Shree) – June 1 (9 pm EST)
Down the Rabbit Hole – (Hosted by Popeye) – June 1 (10 pm EST)

*More shows and times will be announced soon

Bob Tuskin and Alex Thomas will also be doing LIVE radio and UStream appearances through the duration of the event.

***Live UStream Feed Showtimes & Dates***

We will be providing live streaming coverage on our Official Ustream Channel
also found at the Bilderberg 2012 tab at the top of the main page on theintelhub.com

Wednesday May 30:
1 – 3 pm EST
7 – 8 pm EST

Thursday May 31:
1 – 3 pm EST
7 – 8 pm EST

Friday June 1:
1 – 3 pm EST
7 – 8 pm EST

Saturday June 2:
10 – 11 am EST

Alex Jones and the Infowars Crew have done a tremendous job of promoting the protests that will take place in Chantilly at this years meeting. A special thanks goes out to the Infowars Crew for working so hard to expose the globalist criminals and eventually bring this issue into the mainstream.

The following itinerary was released by infowars.com;

Bilderberg 2012 is set to be the scene of the biggest ever protest against the secretive organization.
Listed below are the details and meet-up times for what promises to be a momentous occasion.

Thursday May 31st (1 pm): Everybody to mass near the main entrance to the hotel. This is the key arrival time for Bilderberg members.

Friday June 1st (1pm): The first major bullhorning and protest of Bilderberg will take place at this time.

Saturday June 2nd (10am) and (6pm to dark): Saturday will see two main rallies, one in the morning and one in the evening until nightfall. Since this is the rally likely to be accessible to most people, please attend this one if you cannot make it to any of the others.

Sunday June 3rd (8am – 1pm): We expect most Bilderberg members to leave on Sunday morning. Please be in place nice and early to give them a good send off!

Bilderberg 2012 is going to be historic in terms of a record number of people who have ever protested against Bilderberg. We will force the media to cover the significance of the secretive cabal like never before.

This is about protesting the real power elites, not their puppets. Please obey all laws but be vocal and bring your own banners. Also be sure to bring provisions such as food and water.

Bilderberg 2012 is shaping up to be something the global elite will never forget. This protest really could demolish the secrecy that Bilderberg so desperately craves and crush the group’s to operate behind closed doors without any significant media spotlight.

Photos taken at the Westfield Marriott in Chantilly Virginia
attendees arriving at the Bilderberg (Palm Tree) Conference
Photos © theintelhub.com

Bilderberg Meeting
Chantilly, Virginia, US
May 31 – June 3, 2012

Final List of Participants

Chairman
FRA Castries, Henri de Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
DEU Ackermann, Josef Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG
GBR Agius, Marcus Chairman, Barclays plc
USA Ajami, Fouad Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
USA Alexander, Keith B. Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency
INT Almunia, Joaquín Vice-President – Commissioner for Competition, European Commission
USA Altman, Roger C. Chairman, Evercore Partners
PRT Amado, Luís Chairman, Banco Internacional do Funchal (BANIF)
NOR Andresen, Johan H. Owner and CEO, FERD
FIN Apunen, Matti Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
TUR Babacan, Ali Deputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs
PRT Balsemão, Francisco Pinto President and CEO, Impresa; Former Prime Minister
FRA Baverez, Nicolas Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
FRA Béchu, Christophe Senator, and Chairman, General Council of Maine-et-Loire
BEL Belgium, H.R.H. Prince Philippe of
TUR Berberoðlu, Enis Editor-in-Chief, Hürriyet Newspaper
ITA Bernabè, Franco Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia
GBR Boles, Nick Member of Parliament
SWE Bonnier, Jonas President and CEO, Bonnier AB
NOR Brandtzæg, Svein Richard President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT Bronner, Oscar Publisher, Der Standard Medienwelt
SWE Carlsson, Gunilla Minister for International Development Cooperation
CAN Carney, Mark J. Governor, Bank of Canada
ESP Cebrián, Juan Luis CEO, PRISA; Chairman, El País
AUT Cernko, Willibald CEO, UniCredit Bank Austria AG
FRA Chalendar, Pierre André de Chairman and CEO, Saint-Gobain
DNK Christiansen, Jeppe CEO, Maj Invest
RUS Chubais, Anatoly B. CEO, OJSC RUSNANO
CAN Clark, W. Edmund Group President and CEO, TD Bank Group
GBR Clarke, Kenneth Member of Parliament, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of Justice
USA Collins, Timothy C. CEO and Senior Managing Director, Ripplewood Holdings, LLC
ITA Conti, Fulvio CEO and General Manager, Enel S.p.A.
USA Daniels, Jr., Mitchell E. Governor of Indiana
USA DeMuth, Christopher Distinguished Fellow, Hudson Institute
USA Donilon, Thomas E. National Security Advisor, The White House

GBR Dudley, Robert Group Chief Executive, BP plc
ITA Elkann, John Chairman, Fiat S.p.A.
DEU Enders, Thomas CEO, Airbus
USA Evans, J. Michael Vice Chairman, Global Head of Growth Markets, Goldman Sachs & Co.
AUT Faymann, Werner Federal Chancellor
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S
USA Ferguson, Niall Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History, Harvard University
GBR Flint, Douglas J. Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
CHN Fu, Ying Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs
IRL Gallagher, Paul Former Attorney General; Senior Counsel
USA Gephardt, Richard A. President and CEO, Gephardt Group
GRC Giannitsis, Anastasios Former Minister of Interior; Professor of Development and International Economics, University of Athens
USA Goolsbee, Austan D. Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
USA Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
ITA Gruber, Lilli Journalist – Anchorwoman, La 7 TV
INT Gucht, Karel de Commissioner for Trade, European Commission
NLD Halberstadt, Victor Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
USA Harris, Britt CIO, Teacher Retirement System of Texas
USA Hoffman, Reid Co-founder and Executive Chairman, LinkedIn

CHN Huang, Yiping Professor of Economics, China Center for Economic Research, Peking University
USA Huntsman, Jr., Jon M. Chairman, Huntsman Cancer Foundation
DEU Ischinger, Wolfgang Chairman, Munich Security Conference; Global Head Government Relations, Allianz SE
RUS Ivanov, Igor S. Associate member, Russian Academy of Science; President, Russian International Affairs Council
FRA Izraelewicz, Erik CEO, Le Monde
USA Jacobs, Kenneth M. Chairman and CEO, Lazard
USA Johnson, James A. Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC
USA Jordan, Jr., Vernon E. Senior Managing Director, Lazard
USA Karp, Alexander CEO, Palantir Technologies
USA Karsner, Alexander Executive Chairman, Manifest Energy, Inc

FRA Karvar, Anousheh Inspector, Inter-ministerial Audit and Evaluation Office for Social, Health, Employment and Labor Policies
RUS Kasparov, Garry Chairman, United Civil Front (of Russia)
GBR Kerr, John Independent Member, House of Lords
USA Kerry, John Senator for Massachusetts
TUR Keyman, E. Fuat Director, Istanbul Policy Center and Professor of International Relations, Sabanci University
USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
TUR Koç, Mustafa Chairman, Koç Holding A.Þ.
DEU Koch, Roland CEO, Bilfinger Berger SE
INT Kodmani, Bassma Member of the Executive Bureau and Head of Foreign Affairs, Syrian National Council
USA Kravis, Henry R. Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Josée Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
INT Kroes, Neelie Vice President, European Commission; Commissioner for Digital Agenda
USA Krupp, Fred President, Environmental Defense Fund
INT Lamy, Pascal Director-General, World Trade Organization
ITA Letta, Enrico Deputy Leader, Democratic Party (PD)
ISR Levite, Ariel E. Nonresident Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
USA Li, Cheng Director of Research and Senior Fellow, John L. Thornton China Center, Brookings Institution
USA Lipsky, John Distinguished Visiting Scholar, Johns Hopkins University
USA Liveris, Andrew N. President, Chairman and CEO, The Dow Chemical
Company
DEU Löscher, Peter President and CEO, Siemens AG
USA Lynn, William J. Chairman and CEO, DRS Technologies, Inc.
GBR Mandelson, Peter Member, House of Lords; Chairman, Global Counsel
USA Mathews, Jessica T. President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
DEN Mchangama, Jacob Director of Legal Affairs, Center for Political Studies (CEPOS)
CAN McKenna, Frank Deputy Chair, TD Bank Group
USA Mehlman, Kenneth B. Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
GBR Micklethwait, John Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
FRA Montbrial, Thierry de President, French Institute for International Relations
PRT Moreira da Silva, Jorge First Vice-President, Partido Social Democrata (PSD)
USA Mundie, Craig J. Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Microsoft Corporation
DEU Nass, Matthias Chief International Correspondent, Die Zeit
NLD Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the
ESP Nin Génova, Juan María Deputy Chairman and CEO, Caixabank
IRL Noonan, Michael Minister for Finance
USA Noonan, Peggy Author, Columnist, The Wall Street Journal
FIN Ollila, Jorma Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc
USA Orszag, Peter R. Vice Chairman, Citigroup
GRC Papalexopoulos, Dimitri Managing Director, Titan Cement Co.
NLD Pechtold, Alexander Parliamentary Leader, Democrats ’66 (D66)
USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
NLD Polman, Paul CEO, Unilever PLC
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. Chair, Torys LLP
ISR Rabinovich, Itamar Global Distinguished Professor, New York University
GBR Rachman, Gideon Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Rattner, Steven Chairman, Willett Advisors LLC
CAN Redford, Alison M. Premier of Alberta
CAN Reisman, Heather M. CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
DEU Reitzle, Wolfgang CEO & President, Linde AG
USA Rogoff, Kenneth S. Professor of Economics, Harvard University
USA Rose, Charlie Executive Editor and Anchor, Charlie Rose
USA Ross, Dennis B. Counselor, Washington Institute for Near East Policy

POL Rostowski, Jacek Minister of Finance
USA Rubin, Robert E. Co-Chair, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
NLD Rutte, Mark Prime Minister
ESP Sáenz de Santamaría Antón, Soraya Vice President and Minister for the Presidency
NLD Scheffer, Paul Professor of European Studies, Tilburg University
USA Schmidt, Eric E. Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
AUT Scholten, Rudolf Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
FRA Senard, Jean-Dominique CEO, Michelin Group
USA Shambaugh, David Director, China Policy Program, George Washington University
INT Sheeran, Josette Vice Chairman, World Economic Forum
FIN Siilasmaa, Risto Chairman of the Board of Directors, Nokia Corporation
USA Speyer, Jerry I. Chairman and Co-CEO, Tishman Speyer
CHE Supino, Pietro Chairman and Publisher, Tamedia AG
IRL Sutherland, Peter D. Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
USA Thiel, Peter A. President, Clarium Capital / Thiel Capital
TUR Timuray, Serpil CEO, Vodafone Turkey
DEU Trittin, Jürgen Parliamentary Leader, Alliance 90/The Greens
GRC Tsoukalis, Loukas President, Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy
FIN Urpilainen, Jutta Minister of Finance
CHE Vasella, Daniel L. Chairman, Novartis AG
INT Vimont, Pierre Executive Secretary General, European External Action Service
GBR Voser, Peter CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob Chairman, Investor AB
USA Warsh, Kevin Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
GBR Wolf, Martin H. Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Wolfensohn, James D. Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
CAN Wright, Nigel S. Chief of Staff, Office of the Prime Minister
USA Yergin, Daniel Chairman, IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates
INT Zoellick, Robert B. President, The World Bank Group

Rapporteurs
GBR Bredow, Vendeline von Business Correspondent, The Economist
GBR Wooldridge, Adrian D. Foreign Correspondent, The EconomistInteresting – this guy (listed below as a Bilderberg member) was on O’Reilly tonight: USA Goolsbee, Austan D. Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business

“Power is a curious thing… It’s a trick. A shadow on the wall"

This year the meetings in Chantilly runs through June 4.
Most of the group’s meetings are in Europe.

Wouldn't it be satisfying if the energy being put in to help sort out our misdirected world could turn things around?
It would be comforting to think so but realistically the banks, corporate media and other transnational corporations, the merger maniacal 'dark side', are extending their monopolistic control.

The modern transnational corporation is an immortal, soulless collusion of greed that reduces everything it touches to a dollar value. In law a corporation is a person, able to own property and resources just as a person can only, it
seems, not responsible for the deaths it causes. The present 'War on Terror' is a fraudulent attempt to create a new Moslem enemy, much like the attack on the Jew's in the 1930's. Nato and many Western Military masters are following the same tactics as Hitler's Nazis.

Said David Rockefeller, “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for many years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

Council on Foreign Relations
published and released today 6/2/12
Clinton's Remarks with Danish Foreign Minister Sovndal, May 2012
Clinton's Remarks at the Global Health Summit, June 2012
Why Iran Talks Will Continue
The State of the World’s Refugees: From Indifference to Solidarity (Video)
The State of the World’s Refugees: From Indifference to Solidarity (Audio)
Advancing Human Rights in the UN System
Clinton's Remarks at the Green Partnership for Growth Launch, May 2012
Ambassador Rice's Remarks on Syria, May 2012
http://www.cfr.org/

THE WEST’S SECRET POWER GROUP
In this world exclusive (by Robert Eringer), VERDICT reveals for the first time the activities of this
secret group and the names of the powerful men behind it. “The world is governed by very different
personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Those words were written
by Benjamin Disraeli, empire-building Prime Minister of Great Britain, over a hundred years ago.
http://recolumns.blogspot.com/2010/10/wests-secret-power-group.html

Bilderberg: The Secret Society that Rules Us
Bilderberg, named after the Dutch hotel where members first met in 1954, brings together some of the most influential figures on Earth. More than 120 top-level officials in government, banking, media, finance, business, think-tanks, armed forces, and even European royalty attend the confab every year. According to James P. Tucker, Jr., of American Free Press, Bilderberg is the most exclusive and secretive club in the world. To be admitted, you have to own a multinational bank, a multinational corporation or a country. The Bilderbergers have often been called “the shadow government”, the scene behind the scene. The “inner circle”, or the Advisory Group, includes Giovanni Agnelli of Italy, Eric Roll of Ipsden from Great Britain, David Rockefeller of the USA and Otto Wolff von Amerongen of Germany.
http://subversify.com/2011/06/17/bilderberg-the-secret-society-that-rules-us/

Must see biblically based site
Tony Gosling website editor
http://www.bilderberg.org/tonyhom.htm
http://www.bilderberg.org/bilder.htm

Freemasons: The silent destroyers
– deist religious cult based on the Knights Templar …
http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm

Must read page
The New World Order (NWO) An Overview
In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows: "A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population. […]
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/

So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that
look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
Hebrews 9:28 KJV

Bilderberg Live Stream !
http://www.ustream.tv/embed/6106473

Also here …
http://12160.info/group/occup-bilderberg-2012?xg_source=msg_mes_network

http://OccupyBilderberg.org/

Must read post …
See who's busting Bilderberg wide open
Over 1,000 protesters, pair of news hounds show up to expose truth

CHANTILLY, Va. – An intense and amplified police presence outside the Westfields Marriott Convention Center greeted the more than 1,000 protestors of the Bilderberg Conference on Day 3 of the secret conclave that gathers global leaders of finance and government. On a related note, Wired.com reported that the Pentagon pulled out of working on “The Avengers” film, because they couldn’t ascertain who the fictional, multinational peace-keeping organization answered to. “We couldn’t reconcile the unreality of this international organization and our place in it,” Phil Strub, the Defense Department’s Hollywood liaison, told Wired.com. “To whom did S.H.I.E.L.D. answer?
Did we work for S.H.I.E.L.D.? We hit that roadblock and decided we couldn’t do anything [with the film].”

“That is the ultimate goal of Bilderberg, the end of American sovereignty and the implementation of a globalist elite that controls every aspect of your life,” said Jones, who despite being drenched in sweat, seemed to be gaining
energy as the protests went on.

7 minute WND interview of Alex Jones …
WNDTV catches up with Alex Jones of Infowars on Day 3 of the Bilderberger Conference protests.
Bilderberg 2012 — Alex Jones interview with WND
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZLbdv1uQ0w

Daniel Estulin, author of “The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,” contends the idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting “is to create what they themselves call the aristocracy of purpose between European and
North American elites on the best way to manage the planet.” “In other words,” Estulin told WND in an email exchange in which he answered questions, “the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity.”

Four years ago there were rumors that Barack Obama had been picked as the Democratic presidential nominee. Two days after the event, Hillary Clinton bowed out. […]
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/see-whos-busting-bilderberg-wide-open/

The Intel Hub will be providing LIVE updates and streaming video footage on our U-Stream channel, as well as uploading content fresh to YouTube and providing real-time updates on theintelhub.com’s main page and the Bilderberg 2012 page.

Here are some of The Intel Hub’s official links:

Our Official Website: http://www.theintelhub.com

Our Official Bilderberg 2012 Page: http://theintelhub.com/bilderberg-2012/

Our Official U-Stream Channel: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/11088505

Our Official YouTube Channel:http://www.youtube.com/user/NotForSale2NWO

Our Official Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/IntelHub

Shepard’s Official Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/notforsale2nwo

Bilderberg 2012: Itinerary and Radio Appearances (Updated)
http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/26/bilderberg-2012-itinerary-and-radio-appearances/

Exclusive Photos: Bilderberg Attendees Revealed
http://theintelhub.com/2012/06/01/exclusive-photos-bilderberg-attendees-revealed/

Bilderberg 2012 Official Participant List
http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/31/bilderberg-2012-official-participant-list/

Note: If you are a broadcaster or radio host and would like an appearance or live updates by one of our crew on your show please contact us.

* This has all been made possible by reader donations and our sponsors. PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SPONSORS!

As you may already know we will be covering the Bilderberg meeting and protests in Chantilly Virginia (Westfields Marriott) Between Thursday, May 31st and Sunday June 2nd.

The Intel Hub will be providing LIVE updates and streaming video footage on our U-Stream channel, as well as uploading
content fresh to YouTube and providing real-time updates on theintelhub.com’s main page and the Bilderberg 2012 page.

We have our own battle plan for providing you the best coverage throughout the entire meeting, protests, and events.
Shepard Ambellas (the Founder & director of The Intel Hub and former Host of The Official Intel Hub Radio Show) & Jason (The Infowarrior) Bermas will be conducting live TV and radio interviews on location as well as appearing on nationally syndicated and internet radio shows including but not limited to appearances on (listed in order by times scheduled);

Dangerous Conversation (With Scotty “Ledge” Ledger – May 30th (8 pm)
The Power Hour (Hosted by Joyce Riley) – May 31 (7:30 am EST), June 4
The Jack Blood Show – (Hosted by Jack Blood) – May 31, June 1 (10 am EST)
The Truther Girls – (Hosted by Sonia & Natasha) – May 31 (2 pm EST)
X-Squared Radio – (Hosted by Brooks Agnew) – May 31
The Bob Tuskin Radio Show – May 31 (8 pm EST), June 1 (8:30 pm EST)
Ground Zero Radio – (Hosted by Clyde Lewis) – May 31, June 1
Rense Radio – (Hosted by Jeff Rense) – May 31
Blacklisted Radio – (Hosted By Doug Owen) – June 1 (7 pm EST)
Collision Course – (Hosted by Francis Walsh) – June 1 (8 pm EST)
Truth Frequency Radio – (Hosted by Chris Geo & Shree) – June 1 (9 pm EST)
Down the Rabbit Hole – (Hosted by Popeye) – June 1 (10 pm EST)

*More shows and times will be announced soon

Bob Tuskin and Alex Thomas will also be doing LIVE radio and UStream appearances through the duration of the event.

***Live UStream Feed Showtimes & Dates***

We will be providing live streaming coverage on our Official Ustream Channel
also found at the Bilderberg 2012 tab at the top of the main page on theintelhub.com

Wednesday May 30:
1 – 3 pm EST
7 – 8 pm EST

Thursday May 31:
1 – 3 pm EST
7 – 8 pm EST

Friday June 1:
1 – 3 pm EST
7 – 8 pm EST

Saturday June 2:
10 – 11 am EST

Alex Jones and the Infowars Crew have done a tremendous job of promoting the protests that will take place in Chantilly at this years meeting. A special thanks goes out to the Infowars Crew for working so hard to expose the globalist criminals and eventually bring this issue into the mainstream.

The following itinerary was released by infowars.com;

Bilderberg 2012 is set to be the scene of the biggest ever protest against the secretive organization.
Listed below are the details and meet-up times for what promises to be a momentous occasion.

Thursday May 31st (1 pm): Everybody to mass near the main entrance to the hotel. This is the key arrival time for Bilderberg members.

Friday June 1st (1pm): The first major bullhorning and protest of Bilderberg will take place at this time.

Saturday June 2nd (10am) and (6pm to dark): Saturday will see two main rallies, one in the morning and one in the evening until nightfall. Since this is the rally likely to be accessible to most people, please attend this one if you cannot make it to any of the others.

Sunday June 3rd (8am – 1pm): We expect most Bilderberg members to leave on Sunday morning. Please be in place nice and early to give them a good send off!

Bilderberg 2012 is going to be historic in terms of a record number of people who have ever protested against Bilderberg. We will force the media to cover the significance of the secretive cabal like never before.

This is about protesting the real power elites, not their puppets. Please obey all laws but be vocal and bring your own banners. Also be sure to bring provisions such as food and water.

Bilderberg 2012 is shaping up to be something the global elite will never forget. This protest really could demolish the secrecy that Bilderberg so desperately craves and crush the group’s to operate behind closed doors without any significant media spotlight.

Photos taken at the Westfield Marriott in Chantilly Virginia
attendees arriving at the Bilderberg (Palm Tree) Conference
Photos © theintelhub.com

Bilderberg Meeting
Chantilly, Virginia, US
May 31 – June 3, 2012

Final List of Participants

Chairman
FRA Castries, Henri de Chairman and CEO, AXA Group
DEU Ackermann, Josef Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG
GBR Agius, Marcus Chairman, Barclays plc
USA Ajami, Fouad Senior Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
USA Alexander, Keith B. Commander, US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency
INT Almunia, Joaquín Vice-President – Commissioner for Competition, European Commission
USA Altman, Roger C. Chairman, Evercore Partners
PRT Amado, Luís Chairman, Banco Internacional do Funchal (BANIF)
NOR Andresen, Johan H. Owner and CEO, FERD
FIN Apunen, Matti Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
TUR Babacan, Ali Deputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial Affairs
PRT Balsemão, Francisco Pinto President and CEO, Impresa; Former Prime Minister
FRA Baverez, Nicolas Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
FRA Béchu, Christophe Senator, and Chairman, General Council of Maine-et-Loire
BEL Belgium, H.R.H. Prince Philippe of
TUR Berberoðlu, Enis Editor-in-Chief, Hürriyet Newspaper
ITA Bernabè, Franco Chairman and CEO, Telecom Italia
GBR Boles, Nick Member of Parliament
SWE Bonnier, Jonas President and CEO, Bonnier AB
NOR Brandtzæg, Svein Richard President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
AUT Bronner, Oscar Publisher, Der Standard Medienwelt
SWE Carlsson, Gunilla Minister for International Development Cooperation
CAN Carney, Mark J. Governor, Bank of Canada
ESP Cebrián, Juan Luis CEO, PRISA; Chairman, El País
AUT Cernko, Willibald CEO, UniCredit Bank Austria AG
FRA Chalendar, Pierre André de Chairman and CEO, Saint-Gobain
DNK Christiansen, Jeppe CEO, Maj Invest
RUS Chubais, Anatoly B. CEO, OJSC RUSNANO
CAN Clark, W. Edmund Group President and CEO, TD Bank Group
GBR Clarke, Kenneth Member of Parliament, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of Justice
USA Collins, Timothy C. CEO and Senior Managing Director, Ripplewood Holdings, LLC
ITA Conti, Fulvio CEO and General Manager, Enel S.p.A.
USA Daniels, Jr., Mitchell E. Governor of Indiana
USA DeMuth, Christopher Distinguished Fellow, Hudson Institute
USA Donilon, Thomas E. National Security Advisor, The White House

GBR Dudley, Robert Group Chief Executive, BP plc
ITA Elkann, John Chairman, Fiat S.p.A.
DEU Enders, Thomas CEO, Airbus
USA Evans, J. Michael Vice Chairman, Global Head of Growth Markets, Goldman Sachs & Co.
AUT Faymann, Werner Federal Chancellor
DNK Federspiel, Ulrik Executive Vice President, Haldor Topsøe A/S
USA Ferguson, Niall Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History, Harvard University
GBR Flint, Douglas J. Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
CHN Fu, Ying Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs
IRL Gallagher, Paul Former Attorney General; Senior Counsel
USA Gephardt, Richard A. President and CEO, Gephardt Group
GRC Giannitsis, Anastasios Former Minister of Interior; Professor of Development and International Economics, University of Athens
USA Goolsbee, Austan D. Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Booth School of Business
USA Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
ITA Gruber, Lilli Journalist – Anchorwoman, La 7 TV
INT Gucht, Karel de Commissioner for Trade, European Commission
NLD Halberstadt, Victor Professor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary General of Bilderberg Meetings
USA Harris, Britt CIO, Teacher Retirement System of Texas
USA Hoffman, Reid Co-founder and Executive Chairman, LinkedIn

CHN Huang, Yiping Professor of Economics, China Center for Economic Research, Peking University
USA Huntsman, Jr., Jon M. Chairman, Huntsman Cancer Foundation
DEU Ischinger, Wolfgang Chairman, Munich Security Conference; Global Head Government Relations, Allianz SE
RUS Ivanov, Igor S. Associate member, Russian Academy of Science; President, Russian International Affairs Council
FRA Izraelewicz, Erik CEO, Le Monde
USA Jacobs, Kenneth M. Chairman and CEO, Lazard
USA Johnson, James A. Vice Chairman, Perseus, LLC
USA Jordan, Jr., Vernon E. Senior Managing Director, Lazard
USA Karp, Alexander CEO, Palantir Technologies
USA Karsner, Alexander Executive Chairman, Manifest Energy, Inc

FRA Karvar, Anousheh Inspector, Inter-ministerial Audit and Evaluation Office for Social, Health, Employment and Labor Policies
RUS Kasparov, Garry Chairman, United Civil Front (of Russia)
GBR Kerr, John Independent Member, House of Lords
USA Kerry, John Senator for Massachusetts
TUR Keyman, E. Fuat Director, Istanbul Policy Center and Professor of International Relations, Sabanci University
USA Kissinger, Henry A. Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
USA Kleinfeld, Klaus Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
TUR Koç, Mustafa Chairman, Koç Holding A.Þ.
DEU Koch, Roland CEO, Bilfinger Berger SE
INT Kodmani, Bassma Member of the Executive Bureau and Head of Foreign Affairs, Syrian National Council
USA Kravis, Henry R. Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
USA Kravis, Marie-Josée Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
INT Kroes, Neelie Vice President, European Commission; Commissioner for Digital Agenda
USA Krupp, Fred President, Environmental Defense Fund
INT Lamy, Pascal Director-General, World Trade Organization
ITA Letta, Enrico Deputy Leader, Democratic Party (PD)
ISR Levite, Ariel E. Nonresident Senior Associate, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
USA Li, Cheng Director of Research and Senior Fellow, John L. Thornton China Center, Brookings Institution
USA Lipsky, John Distinguished Visiting Scholar, Johns Hopkins University
USA Liveris, Andrew N. President, Chairman and CEO, The Dow Chemical
Company
DEU Löscher, Peter President and CEO, Siemens AG
USA Lynn, William J. Chairman and CEO, DRS Technologies, Inc.
GBR Mandelson, Peter Member, House of Lords; Chairman, Global Counsel
USA Mathews, Jessica T. President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
DEN Mchangama, Jacob Director of Legal Affairs, Center for Political Studies (CEPOS)
CAN McKenna, Frank Deputy Chair, TD Bank Group
USA Mehlman, Kenneth B. Partner, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
GBR Micklethwait, John Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
FRA Montbrial, Thierry de President, French Institute for International Relations
PRT Moreira da Silva, Jorge First Vice-President, Partido Social Democrata (PSD)
USA Mundie, Craig J. Chief Research and Strategy Officer, Microsoft Corporation
DEU Nass, Matthias Chief International Correspondent, Die Zeit
NLD Netherlands, H.M. the Queen of the
ESP Nin Génova, Juan María Deputy Chairman and CEO, Caixabank
IRL Noonan, Michael Minister for Finance
USA Noonan, Peggy Author, Columnist, The Wall Street Journal
FIN Ollila, Jorma Chairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plc
USA Orszag, Peter R. Vice Chairman, Citigroup
GRC Papalexopoulos, Dimitri Managing Director, Titan Cement Co.
NLD Pechtold, Alexander Parliamentary Leader, Democrats ’66 (D66)
USA Perle, Richard N. Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
NLD Polman, Paul CEO, Unilever PLC
CAN Prichard, J. Robert S. Chair, Torys LLP
ISR Rabinovich, Itamar Global Distinguished Professor, New York University
GBR Rachman, Gideon Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Rattner, Steven Chairman, Willett Advisors LLC
CAN Redford, Alison M. Premier of Alberta
CAN Reisman, Heather M. CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
DEU Reitzle, Wolfgang CEO & President, Linde AG
USA Rogoff, Kenneth S. Professor of Economics, Harvard University
USA Rose, Charlie Executive Editor and Anchor, Charlie Rose
USA Ross, Dennis B. Counselor, Washington Institute for Near East Policy

POL Rostowski, Jacek Minister of Finance
USA Rubin, Robert E. Co-Chair, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the Treasury
NLD Rutte, Mark Prime Minister
ESP Sáenz de Santamaría Antón, Soraya Vice President and Minister for the Presidency
NLD Scheffer, Paul Professor of European Studies, Tilburg University
USA Schmidt, Eric E. Executive Chairman, Google Inc.
AUT Scholten, Rudolf Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
FRA Senard, Jean-Dominique CEO, Michelin Group
USA Shambaugh, David Director, China Policy Program, George Washington University
INT Sheeran, Josette Vice Chairman, World Economic Forum
FIN Siilasmaa, Risto Chairman of the Board of Directors, Nokia Corporation
USA Speyer, Jerry I. Chairman and Co-CEO, Tishman Speyer
CHE Supino, Pietro Chairman and Publisher, Tamedia AG
IRL Sutherland, Peter D. Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
USA Thiel, Peter A. President, Clarium Capital / Thiel Capital
TUR Timuray, Serpil CEO, Vodafone Turkey
DEU Trittin, Jürgen Parliamentary Leader, Alliance 90/The Greens
GRC Tsoukalis, Loukas President, Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy
FIN Urpilainen, Jutta Minister of Finance
CHE Vasella, Daniel L. Chairman, Novartis AG
INT Vimont, Pierre Executive Secretary General, European External Action Service
GBR Voser, Peter CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
SWE Wallenberg, Jacob Chairman, Investor AB
USA Warsh, Kevin Distinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford University
GBR Wolf, Martin H. Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
USA Wolfensohn, James D. Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and Company
CAN Wright, Nigel S. Chief of Staff, Office of the Prime Minister
USA Yergin, Daniel Chairman, IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates
INT Zoellick, Robert B. President, The World Bank Group

Rapporteurs
GBR Bredow, Vendeline von Business Correspondent, The Economist
GBR Wooldridge, Adrian D. Foreign Correspondent, The Economist

Totalitarianism

Supreme Court Justices

May 28th, 2012 by

Some of the Justices do not disclose a religious affiliation; however, their personal history reflects an association.  The following information and references is sent for the purpose of research and verification.  The reason for this investigation arose from the recent "push back" of the Catholic Church concerning the birth control mandates in healthcare laws.

R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences
Freelance Investigative Science Reporter since 1996

Supreme Court Justices

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, Roman Catholic

was born in Buffalo, New York, January 27, 1955. He married Jane Marie Sullivan in 1996 and they have two children – Josephine and John. He received an A.B. from Harvard College in 1976 and a J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1979. He served as a law clerk for Judge Henry J. Friendly of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1979–1980 and as a law clerk for then-Associate Justice William H. Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1980 Term. He was Special Assistant to the Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice from 1981–1982, Associate Counsel to President Ronald Reagan, White House Counsel’s Office from 1982–1986, and Principal Deputy Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice from 1989–1993. From 1986–1989 and 1993–2003, he practiced law in Washington, D.C. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2003. President George W. Bush nominated him as Chief Justice of the United States, and he took his seat September 29, 2005.

Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, Roman Catholic

was born in Trenton, New Jersey, March 11, 1936. He married Maureen McCarthy and has nine children – Ann Forrest, Eugene, John Francis, Catherine Elisabeth, Mary Clare, Paul David, Matthew, Christopher James, and Margaret Jane. He received his A.B. from Georgetown University and the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School, and was a Sheldon Fellow of Harvard University from 1960–1961. He was in private practice in Cleveland, Ohio from 1961–1967, a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia from 1967–1971, and a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago from 1977–1982, and a Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University and Stanford University. He was chairman of the American Bar Association’s Section of Administrative Law, 1981–1982, and its Conference of Section Chairmen, 1982–1983. He served the federal government as General Counsel of the Office of Telecommunications Policy from 1971–1972, Chairman of the Administrative Conference of the United States from 1972–1974, and Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel from 1974–1977. He was appointed Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1982. President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat September 26, 1986.

Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Roman Catholic
 

was born in Sacramento, California, July 23, 1936. He married Mary Davis and has three children. He received his B.A. from Stanford University and the London School of Economics, and his LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He was in private practice in San Francisco, California from 1961–1963, as well as in Sacramento, California from 1963–1975. From 1965 to 1988, he was a Professor of Constitutional Law at the McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific. He has served in numerous positions during his career, including a member of the California Army National Guard in 1961, the board of the Federal Judicial Center from 1987–1988, and two committees of the Judicial Conference of the United States: the Advisory Panel on Financial Disclosure Reports and Judicial Activities, subsequently renamed the Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct, from 1979–1987, and the Committee on Pacific Territories from 1979–1990, which he chaired from 1982–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1975. President Reagan nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat February 18, 1988.

Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Roman Catholic
 

was born in the Pin Point community of Georgia near Savannah June 23, 1948. He married Virginia Lamp in 1987 and has one child, Jamal Adeen, by a previous marriage. He attended Conception Seminary and received an A.B., cum laude, from Holy Cross College, and a J.D. from Yale Law School in 1974. He was admitted to law practice in Missouri in 1974, and served as an Assistant Attorney General of Missouri from 1974–1977, an attorney with the Monsanto Company from 1977–1979, and Legislative Assistant to Senator John Danforth from 1979–1981. From 1981–1982, he served as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education, and as Chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from 1982–1990. He became a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1990. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 23, 1991.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice, Judaism
 

was born in Brooklyn, New York, March 15, 1933. She married Martin D. Ginsburg in 1954, and has a daughter, Jane, and a son, James. She received her B.A. from Cornell University, attended Harvard Law School, and received her LL.B. from Columbia Law School. She served as a law clerk to the Honorable Edmund L. Palmieri, Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, from 1959–1961. From 1961–1963, she was a research associate and then associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure. She was a Professor of Law at Rutgers University School of Law from 1963–1972, and Columbia Law School from 1972–1980, and a fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences in Stanford, California from 1977–1978. In 1971, she was instrumental in launching the Women’s Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, and served as the ACLU’s General Counsel from 1973–1980, and on the National Board of Directors from 1974–1980. She was appointed a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 1980. President Clinton nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat August 10, 1993.

 

Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice, Judaism
 

was born in San Francisco, California, August 15, 1938. He married Joanna Hare in 1967, and has three children – Chloe, Nell, and Michael. He received an A.B. from Stanford University, a B.A. from Magdalen College, Oxford, and an LL.B. from Harvard Law School. He served as a law clerk to Justice Arthur Goldberg of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1964 Term, as a Special Assistant to the Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Antitrust, 1965–1967, as an Assistant Special Prosecutor of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force, 1973, as Special Counsel of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, 1974–1975, and as Chief Counsel of the committee, 1979–1980. He was an Assistant Professor, Professor of Law, and Lecturer at Harvard Law School, 1967–1994, a Professor at the Harvard University Kennedy School of Government, 1977–1980, and a Visiting Professor at the College of Law, Sydney, Australia and at the University of Rome. From 1980–1990, he served as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and as its Chief Judge, 1990–1994. He also served as a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, 1990–1994, and of the United States Sentencing Commission, 1985–1989. President Clinton nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat August 3, 1994.

Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, Roman Catholic (?)
 

was born in Trenton, New Jersey, April 1, 1950. He married Martha-Ann Bomgardner in 1985, and has two children – Philip and Laura. He served as a law clerk for Leonard I. Garth of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from 1976–1977. He was Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1977–1981, Assistant to the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1981–1985, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, 1985–1987, and U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1987–1990. He was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1990. President George W. Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat January 31, 2006.

Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, Roman Catholic (?)
 

was born in Bronx, New York, on June 25, 1954. She earned a B.A. in 1976 from Princeton University, graduating summa cum laude and receiving the university's highest academic honor. In 1979, she earned a J.D. from Yale Law School where she served as an editor of the Yale Law Journal. She served as Assistant District Attorney in the New York County District Attorney's Office from 1979–1984. She then litigated international commercial matters in New York City at Pavia & Harcourt, where she served as an associate and then partner from 1984–1992. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush nominated her to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, and she served in that role from 1992–1998. She served as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1998–2009. President Barack Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, and she assumed this role August 8, 2009.

 

Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, Judaism
 

was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960.  She received an A.B., summa cum laude, in 1981 from Princeton University.  She attended Worcester College, Oxford University, as Princeton’s Daniel M. Sachs Graduating Fellow, and received an M. Phil. in 1983.  In 1986, she earned a J.D. from Harvard Law School, graduating magna cum laude, where she was supervising editor of the Harvard Law Review.  She served as a law clerk to Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1986-1987.  She served as a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1987 Term.  She worked as an associate in the Washington, D.C. law firm of Williams & Connolly, LLP, from 1989-1991.  She became an assistant professor at the University of Chicago Law School in 1991 and a tenured professor of law in 1995.  From 1995-1999, she was associate counsel to President Clinton and then served as deputy assistant to the President for Domestic Policy and Deputy Director of the Domestic Policy Council.  She joined Harvard Law School as a visiting professor in 1999 and became professor of law in 2001.  She was the Charles Hamilton Houston Professor of Law and was appointed the 11th dean of Harvard Law School in 2003.  President Obama nominated her to serve as the 45th Solicitor General of the United States and she was confirmed on March 19, 2009.  President Obama nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on May 10, 2010, and she assumed this role on August 7, 2010.

 

RETIRED MEMBERS

 

Sandra Day O’Connor (Retired), Associate Justice, Episcopalian
 

was born in El Paso, Texas, March 26, 1930. She married John Jay O’Connor III in 1952 and has three sons – Scott, Brian, and Jay. She received her B.A. and LL.B. from Stanford University. She served as Deputy County Attorney of San Mateo County, California from 1952–1953 and as a civilian attorney for Quartermaster Market Center, Frankfurt, Germany from 1954–1957. From 1958–1960, she practiced law in Maryvale, Arizona, and served as Assistant Attorney General of Arizona from 1965–1969. She was appointed to the Arizona State Senate in1969 and was subsequently reelected to two two-year terms. In 1975 she was elected Judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court and served until 1979, when she was appointed to the Arizona Court of Appeals. President Reagan nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and she took her seat September 25, 1981. Justice O’Connor retired from the Supreme Court on January 31, 2006.

David H. Souter (Retired), Associate Justice, Episcopalian
 

was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, September 17, 1939. He graduated from Harvard College, from which he received his A.B. After two years as a Rhodes Scholar at Magdalen College, Oxford, he received an A.B. in Jurisprudence from Oxford University and an M.A. in 1989. After receiving an LL.B. from Harvard Law School, he was an associate at Orr and Reno in Concord, New Hampshire from 1966 to 1968, when he became an Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1971, he became Deputy Attorney General and in 1976, Attorney General of New Hampshire. In 1978, he was named an Associate Justice of the Superior Court of New Hampshire, and was appointed to the Supreme Court of New Hampshire as an Associate Justice in 1983. He became a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on May 25, 1990. President Bush nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat October 9, 1990. Justice Souter retired from the Supreme Court on June 29, 2009.

John Paul Stevens (Retired), Associate Justice, Protestant
 

was born in Chicago, Illinois, April 20, 1920. He married Maryan Mulholland, and has four children – John Joseph (deceased), Kathryn, Elizabeth Jane, and Susan Roberta. He received an A.B. from the University of Chicago, and a J.D. from Northwestern University School of Law. He served in the United States Navy from 1942–1945, and was a law clerk to Justice Wiley Rutledge of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1947 Term. He was admitted to law practice in Illinois in 1949. He was Associate Counsel to the Subcommittee on the Study of Monopoly Power of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, 1951–1952, and a member of the Attorney General’s National Committee to Study Antitrust Law, 1953–1955. He was Second Vice President of the Chicago Bar Association in 1970. From 1970–1975, he served as a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. President Ford nominated him as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and he took his seat December 19, 1975. Justice Stevens retired from the Supreme Court on June 29, 2010.

 

ADDENDUM

 

The Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20543
Phone: 202-479-3211

Members:
Chief Justice of the United States JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.

Associate Justices:

ANTONIN SCALIA
ANTHONY M. KENNEDY
CLARENCE THOMAS
RUTH BADER GINSBURG
STEPHEN G. BREYER
SAMUEL A. ALITO, JR.
SONIA SOTOMAYOR
ELENA KAGAN

Retired Justices:

SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR
DAVID H. SOUTER
JOHN PAUL STEVENS

The Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and such number of Associate Justices as may be fixed by Congress. The number of Associate Justices is currently fixed at eight (28 U. S. C. §1). Power to nominate the Justices is vested in the President of the United States, and appointments are made with the advice and consent of the Senate. Article III, §1, of the Constitution further provides that "[t]he Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."

CORRUPTION

 

DRAKES FAQ

May 21st, 2012 by

 

Due to the larger number of questions that we receive during interviews with Drake, they may not all be answered. You can email questions to: freedomreignsusa@gmail.com. Questions will be answered the following broadcast where Drake will be a guest (typically Wednesdays). Deatra has stressed that if you ask questions that they have already answered, she will ignore them.

 

Freedom Reigns has a Facebook page that can be found here: http://www.facebook.com/groups/125145437569277/

Updates will be made to any information that has been previously provided by Drake.

New information will be added as it is released.

LAW DICTIONARY – ONLINE [Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd Ed)]

http://thelawdictionary.org/ This is an older version but is useful for legal terms.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC or the Code), first published in 1952, is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America.

• You will need to search for your state’s UCC version.

• Reservation of Rights is part of the UCC.

o Example: When you sign your driver’s license, you are agreeing to any and all laws dealing with transportation. If you do not know those laws you are subject to them unless you put Reservation of Rights above your signature.

o This is true of all contracts. Any portion of any contract that is not fully explained to the understanding of the individual signing said contract makes that contract null and void and unenforceable. It is to be treated in law as if it never existed.

AREA 51 & DULCE, NEW MEXICO NEW (04/29/2012)

• Parts of Area 51 are now empty and a couple of the others are empty. A lot of the stuff that was out there has been used in terms of moving them into tunnels, tunnel systems and underground bases. This was your top of the line technology reverse engineered from supposed ET craft that crashed. These things have been spread all over the country. The people who had the idea reverse engineering did so for two reasons:

1. Military superiority in terms of weaponry.

2. The advanced technologies would give them the capability of having all the electricity they wanted for as long as they wanted it kind of thing.

ARRESTS

• The timeframe for this is 30-45 days from 8 April 2012.

• The arrests, taking into custody, sweep, and housecleaning, whatever you want to call it, will not come much lower than governor level, if that.

• President and Congress – 13th amendment will apply. If you are an agent in any way, form or shape, holding allegiance or gratitude to a foreign power, not only can you not hold citizenship, you cannot hold any office. You are not allowed to be here.

UPDATED (04/29/2012)

• He won’t be definitive about the arrests. There are the beginnings of the things which he has discussed on prior radio shows that have already transpired.

• Europe is going crazy. The reason they are going crazy is 2 reasons: they do not have the funds to back the currency known as the euro and they also have an extraordinary, staggering and impossible to pay back debt.

• A NORTHCOM maneuver is scheduled between May 2- 9 in 6 different states. Seeing military convoys wouldn’t be out of place since it is a training exercise however it could be the good guys putting their troops in place.

• The legalistics involved should be complete as of this past week. If not, the first of next week.

• Majority of the executive orders, if any, that can be used on a legal basis simply because they have not been done correctly.

• People need to start learning how these things work so they can take this down to the local level and tell their mayor no, nature does not clean up the leaves in the forest so there is no need for me to clean up the leaves in my yard as such. You are not sending locals workers over to do that for me and then charging me for the privilege. This goes to property rights.

• When certain people are in a position to do so, they will take a sweep. They will take all the people from behind the people you have in office – the financiers, people that have been being the document runners and people like that are all of a sudden going to disappear. After that sweep is made, they make sure they have all the records they need to prosecute these people. Then the people will be given the notification to go into a green light status. That means everyone will be notified about 24 hours ahead of the time you get to see people put away in handcuffs.

(UPDATED 05/06/2012)

• Regarding the arrests: it will be soon and Drake will not give a date. The dates he has been given on anything have come directly from the military so he’ll let them deal with it. The federal government as we know it will cease to exist. Most of it is unnecessary and a lot of it is illegal.

• There will be some gun fights (the bad guys not wanting to be captured).

BANKS

• Per Drake, if you have money in the bank everything will be zeroed out.

• Afterwards there will be a RV (re-evaluation) according to a combination of both personal and collateral accounts.

• The collateral accounts will try to attend to a combination of public works, making sure people have jobs, thing of this nature.

• The private accounts will be more attuned to making sure that the people who would bring out emergency food stuffs to people who don’t have any food have gas for their trucks and things of this nature

• The banks themselves, if they are not directly affiliated with the Federal Reserve or central banking system, will not be taken down.

• The re-evaluation is going to be a different type of value in terms of currency. We will be going from what we now know as a debt system to what will be known as equity system.

• You may be looking at 2-3 times the purchasing power you had with the Federal Reserve note. This means wages, costs, a lot of things are going to adjust.

• These things are predicated on two basis: direct valuation (means that things have a certain value) and to go along with this productivity in terms of what the individual people are capable of

doing and making sure they have the opportunity to do so. These are to see the basic needs of individuals.

• The currency of a country should be backed by some value.

• For people that have money in the bank (prior to everything being zeroed), consider purchasing gold and silver coins. By having $200-$300 worth of silver coins (called junk silver because they are 85% or more silver) you have a vendible currency that is always recognized.

• From Drake’s understanding, it will not take very long to change from the debit system to the value system.

• We will continue using the current currency and it will be phased out over time. Drake has not been told yet what the new currency will be. There will be a dead period that can be addressed with gold and silver coin. Get at least enough to last you basically a week in terms of your expenses (groceries, fuel, etc.).

(UPDATED 05/06/2012)

• There are several things going on that people don’t know about. Several of those took place recently. One of those was the liens against the banking system in Europe. The interesting part about this is the legalities involved in this are basically set. There is a second and third part to that. The secondary part is coming in the near future but Drake is not certain exactly when and if he had the information he would refuse to give it out simply to protect the people doing it. The secondary part of this is causing the liens to become a warrant. The manner in which that is done is by requiring the bank, according to its charter, to pay its annual fee on the amount of the collateral accounts they have been using as collateral to maintain their operations. When that is done, the request for payment then becomes a warrant to the bank to produce their payment. When the bank cannot pay this, they are immediately referred to their bonding company. The bonding company then takes care of the problem whatever it may be. That is the system. The problem is that the bank cannot pay it. They don’t have that kind of collateral in gold which is the required payment. The bonding company doesn’t have it either so primarily you are looking at a bankruptcy. If a bank refuses to perform, in terms of reporting to its bonding company that there is some sort of serious problem, then that in and of itself is felonious and anyone who is involved with that bank can go to jail. If they do report to the bonding company, the bank is cleared of that. If the bonding company does not report back to the lien holder, that is also felonious and everyone associated can also be arrested.

• A 143 country consortium refuses to abide by the Rothschild banking system any further. They formed their own banking system.

• As these things transpire then these people, who are iffy at best, who did this on purpose in terms of our banking system, are being systematically singled out and that systematic singling out will come in the form of these arrests that everyone has been talking about. There will still be mass arrests also.

• You can expect a bank holiday when they zero out the funds so they can get rid of the bad guys. Then you will not have basic currency like we are used to and this is where the little bit of silver come in if you need it. Stock it up for a few days, maybe a week or two. Make sure you have some food. Make sure your medications are in order.

• Don’t be overly concerned. Drake’s understanding is the phones are going to work, the toilet will flush and some people can go to work and not worry about it.

BRIDGES NEW (04/29/2012)

• The dark cabal has drilled holes in the cement of the bridges to put explosives in. The good guys are still working at removing the explosives. There are a lot of bridges.

CHEMTRAILS NEW (04/29/2012)

• If we can’t get official action sometimes the people have to take action. Drake has made an issue of this through his contact chains and other people that they need to address this. Some things have been done but not nearly enough. Hopefully at some point you will start seeing fighter jets escorting these people to the ground or shooting them down or something of this nature.

• Is there any benefit to a chemtrail that we are unaware of? That depends what is in it. There are chemicals, mixes of things that can remedy most of the problems that those things have created. It can also clean the atmosphere and us. They can be beneficial if used correctly with the correct ingredients yes.

CHICAGO (NATO Meeting) NEW (04/29/2012)

• Doubt an evacuation will happen. Evacuating Chicago would be an extraordinary undertaking. The logistics do not fit. The areas around people will be sanitized and anyone questionable will get to take a trip, either voluntarily or with assistance.

• Black choppers are an intimidation and scare tactic.

• Bad guys no longer have a place to hide nor can they get off planet.

CHINA NEW (04/29/2012)

• Should we be concerned about people from China building here? Why aren’t we using people from the United States? Each individual nation will be responsible for their people. You will find that there will be a lack of capable people (people correctly trained) to handle infrastructure repair.

COMMUNITIES

• Involves individuals, small towns, counties, things of this nature are going to become critical for two reasons:

1. Self survival, self preservation

2. The people will be seeing several different structural plans for a government in this country. It is going to be hinged on and primarily put together just a little differently but very similar to what we originally had. Drake’s understanding of the plan is two-fold:

 The federal government as everyone knows it now is going and§ the finances will be turned back to the treasury.

 The structural plans will be put on display at voting places§ for everyone to see with an explanation of what they are for/do. Individual nation-states will stand individually. There will be agreements between them per the Articles of Confederation.

 We will have a much more transparent§ government.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS)

• Ammunition Purchases – Just because you say you are doing something does not necessarily mean it is happening. Would check to see if there is a contract along with payment that validates what you are saying.

DRAKE’S AFFLIATION

• He has had dealings with both the White Knights and White Dragons.

• He is not a member of these groups at this time.

• There have been several Drakes popping up all over the place.

• If someone wishes to contract Drake, they may do so through www.freedomreigns.us

DRAKE’S COFFEE (Medicinal)

• He uses regular coffee but adds a few things.

• Makes 12 cups with filtered water. Uses 4 level scoops of Folder’s Dark Blend coffee. Flatten out the coffee so it is not heaped up.

• Ginger – it takes care of the acid feeling in your stomach that can occur from drinking coffee. Put enough in to speckle it a light yellowish color.

• Whole Ground Cloves – these are a pain reliever. Put enough in until it is speckled brown.

• Hyssop (can buy at a health food store) – sprinkle enough to sort of cover the prior ingredients.

• Red Clover – is a blood cleaner. Add a healthy pinch (equivalent of 1-2 blossoms and some leaves).

• Then make the coffee. The coffee will have a naturally sweet taste.

FARMERS NEW (04/29/2012)

• Two things will happen as this thing starts working itself out:

1. Re-emergence of manufacturing in this county.

2. The other general intention or focus is going to be on farming (see Localization).

FEDERAL RESERVE NEW (04/29/2012)

• Will the $16 trillion of bailout money that went to the bankers’ pockets have to be paid back? Recently on Divine Cosmos, David Wilcock put out the report of all twelve central banks being leined. The deal with the leins is that the answer is yes. The central banks now have to pay back all of those funds that they obtained illegally. Basically the central banking system is getting ready to go bankrupt. Parts of it already have in Europe and other countries.

(UPDATED 05/06/2012)

• The Federal Reserve, in terms of its collection branch known as the IRS, is supposed to last for a year. Drake has heard three different stories on this:

1. One is that they can close it down in a year’s time and get it straightened out. Drake feels this is wishful thinking.

2. The next one is a minimum of two years and they said that they may be able to do it in that period of time that they weren’t sure.

3. The last estimate was four years. This does not mean that this thing will be active in any way, shape or form during this period of time.

FINANCIAL SYSTEM

• There have been numerous resignations and arrests in Europe.

• In the U.S., banking officials decided to take extended foreign vacations instead of resigning. When this was discovered, some of the people have been stopped at the borders, their credentials checked, their passport was kept and they were told to go home.

• Since the current banking system can no longer take money from small foreign countries, they are limited to funds on hand. The funds on hand have been stolen, leveraged, borrowed and securitized away from what are called Collateral Global Accounts. This was without permission and illegal. These things are being addressed.

• The banks are responsible for paying this money back, not us.

• When the Fed goes here, so does the financial basis, backbone or support of most of the G20.

• All of the financial power, to include the reach anyone has in any capacity (corporate, government, whatever), is going to be reduced to having no value. The framework they operate in will be taken down (the basis for it which is money).

UPDATED (04/29/2012)

• Russia’s stock exchange is realigning some of what they are doing but the problem is a person by the name of George Soros. He couldn’t affect a direct takedown while he was in the country. Apparently there was an arrest warrant issued for him for financial terrorism. Russia shut down for self-protection.

• U.S. stock market is bogus in terms of its valuation. The actual valuation right now is around 6,000. Remember what happened to housing. The housing market today is basically at more of a true value then it has been in a lot of years. When a stock splits, they are diluting the value.

• Do not throw away your Federal Reserve notes. The re-evaluation will reinstate them on an equity basis so they will still have value.

FREE ENERGY

• Drake is in the process of making some of his own.

• The technologies that have been repressed are going to be a part of the disclosure. The disclosures are going to be tremendous. Anyone that has had or has cancer will be treated in such a manner that they will no longer have it.

FUKUSHIMA

• Was in the works for 5 years. There is no documentary evidence concerning that, that anyone can come up with at this point.

• Documentation on it does exist and is hoping to preserve that in order to prosecute the people involved with it.

• Japan is unsafe to live in and this has not been told to the people.

• The radiation has spread to Europe. The problem is not radiation itself but the type of radiation.

• This was an extortion attempt and used an explosive device.

HAARP

• Has been used for a combination of things. One is extraordinary weather (called weather wars). Other parts of it are earthquakes, tsunamis, extraordinary lacks in certain things (example: if you move the jet stream a certain way and a whole area goes dry).

HOUSING CRISIS

• Foreclosed homes will be returned to the owner. People that have bought those homes will need to find a new one.

• The interest rate in terms of a mortgage is going to become a moot point. People may want to look what is occurring in Iceland.

1. Majority of what the central banking system was telling them was fraudulent. Iceland ruled that their debt was fraudulent and that the banks could pay their own debt.

2. Recently Iceland forgave all mortgages.

• You are your own creditor. Fact of the matter is that these things will be officially recognized and rectified. All federal taxes will disappear and as well as your mortgage.

UPDATED (04/29/2012)

• Strawman account is in our name and tied to our birth certificate. Specifically the strawman doesn’t exist and what it is is an equity issued according to your value. Generally it is around three billion dollars. This goes directly to the Fed in terms of valuation upon birth. You have to

remember that because of the fictitiousness of the origins of these actions, as goes to the corporate government, that

1. A corporation has no more right than Walmart or someone else to collect taxes and

2. They do not have the capability to lawfully operate as an entity where it regards a free people.

• The other part of this is that you have people losing their homes because they don’t understand that they are actually issuing the credit to the mortgage holders against themselves. In other words, you are worth X amount of money. If you sign a paper, there’s no transfer of funds. They go on a computer screen and change some numbers and that’s it. There is no value that moves.

• As to the issue of the credit, the individual does not owe but the banks do. This is a part of the reverse they put it to cause us to think certain things. People have been lead to believe that when you apply for a loan you are actually getting an intrinsic value when you’re not.

• As far as fighting that sort of thing, there are several places you can go. Put “knockoutcollectors.com” into your browser’s address bar (do not do a search) and you will come up with some answers. There are a whole lot of things in legalistics and legal terms that most average people are unaware of. Due to the bankruptcies that this country has had, we operate under what’s called the Unified Commercial Code (UCC). Everything is commerce.

• The strawman ideology: yes it does have some legal valuation, it does have some legal ramifications but using the UCC as an international law whereby all commerce is conducted within this field of a combination of understanding and enforcement, then everyone has to pay certain portions of bills when they are coming payable. It also outlines contracts – exactly their legal condition, and the manner in which you can sign one so they cannot say you agreed to the contract so this, this and this applies when it is not written anywhere in the contract.

• You use UCC 1-308 called Reservation of Rights. That means there is no implied contract. If you want to start some stuff and you’re paying federal taxes, put Reservation of Rights above your name when you sign something. It would be an idea for those who decide to do so to have a good lawyer.

• For people looking at buying a home at this time: make sure the deal is structured correctly, make sure that the property they are looking at to buy is comparable to valuations done on properties similar to it within that area.

• Most of the foreclosures have been ruled as fraudulent and the property is to either be returned or compensation made to the original owner. It may not be the best idea to invest in these things. The only entity that you are assisting when you do so is the bank itself.

ICELAND NEW (04/29/2012)

• Some of the information Drake has been given on Iceland is privileged and he has not been given authorization to discuss it.

• A certain amount of the mortgages have been forgiven according to where they were originated and the types of monies involved.

JUDGES NEW (04/29/2012)

• There are people in prison that shouldn’t be there because a judge had made a mistake. Drake suggests holding the judge personally responsible for incorrect application of the law. The record should be expunged (stricken from all records).

LOCALIZATION NEW (04/29/2012)

• On the website, www.freedomreigns.us, you will find a thing called Community Support. It provides a combination of both helping each other with simplistic things (if someone can’t do

something, you help them with it or if they need something, you may provide it). The other part of it is protection.

• Drake is not recommending violence. What he is recommending is for everyone to get their groups together and get a phone tree going. When you see something funky, call the sheriff.

• Have somebody who has time and the capability to keep an eye out and make sure they have a cell phone and a radio. It would be a good idea to advise all of the militias to put a scout, a recon, a lookout, whatever you want to call it out there with a radio and a cell phone. The call does this: they call for reinforcements, the reinforcements call the sheriff and they call up the phone tree for civilians. The militia is deployed to whatever the problem area is and these people are confronted.

(UPDATED 05/06/2012)

• The ideology is one person who is awake and the rest are not and you want to get a message out, go talk to someone it doesn’t matter who it is. Is there something that can be done that will benefit everyone that they probably would like to have taken care of? That can be anything … squeaky hinge, chipped steps, someone needs their grass mowed and can’t do it for themselves for whatever reason, go get it done. Could be as simple as a ride to the store.

• If you get a new washer and dryer, what do you do with the old ones? Do you have them cart them off or do you give them to a charity that gives out washers and dryers? Or give them to someone who needs replacements.

• Militias need to introduce themselves so they are known.

• What are you going to do to make sure that your local area it is also straightened out? If you don’t have a community working together, if you don’t have eyes and ears, how will you find out who is dirty and who is not dirty? It’s just that simple.

• The sheriff might be a great guy and he might have one deputy that is a little funky and no one has paid attention to it. The time is now to get those kinds of people out there. If they are doing something other than what they are supposed to be doing, they can’t be doing what they are supposed to be doing.

• States issues will need to be handled by individuals in that state. The same applies to your town or community. Unite and work together to take back your community. If you want freedom, you have to work for it.

• A lot of the convenience things that people are used to are not going to be readily available. It is going to be more of a regression or a turning back in time to an extent.

• If you can something correctly it can last 5-10 years and you won’t have any problem with it. Learning this is fairly easy. Go online and find out everything you need to know. How to prep the ground, how to can something, what you have to do it to can it and what you have to do if you want to preserve can it.

MISCELLANEOUS (NEW 05/06/2012)

NOTE: These were questions that do not have a specific area.

• Social security, disability and military pensions will not be cut off.

• Mutual funds will be zeroed out and there will be a revaluation. Small investors will be compensated according to what they have invested. Most of the small people, to include business owners, will not be hurt by this revaluation. You will get something to what is called par value or some sort of direct exchange. So you will end up making money with the revaluation.

• There will be no commerce for a few days while the accounts are being zeroed out. Then there will be a revaluation.

• You will not see any cabal members and you are not likely to see any member of the bar Association in terms of holding any office or being able to ever again. This is one of the stipulations in terms of the 13th Amendment. The individuals are subject to lose their citizenship as well.

• Is Obama a good guy or bad guy? He might be a switch-a-Rooney.

• Drake says they have a combination of both internet stations as well as main stream media. These are ready to link in at the time that green light condition has been given. To tell if this is the real deal, it will be posted on the Freedom Reigns website. Information will be put out as to what channel to go to, to learn what has been done and to educate people according to what the differences are going to be.

• All of these actions are global. There are people working to set up information in the Freedom Reigns forums for countries outside the US.

• Food replicators are real and have been used since the 50s. They are not preprogrammed to make it taste like it’s supposed to and you are likely to get some really strange things.

• Political prisoners will be released if they are truly political prisoners and have not violated common law (injured part or injured property).

• Students in college will find that their education changes a bit because there is a problem with two things: history and factuality have been changed to suit a specific political and communist agenda. This will be righted and books will change.

MOLESTERS NEW (04/29/2012)

• Bogus charges are difficult to clear. If you have any physical evidence, save it. Any kind of jar will do for liquids.

• A molester living too close to schools, as Drake understands it, is forbidden under the sexual predator laws.

OPERATION GREEN LIGHT (24-hour advance notice) NEW (04/29/2012)

• Not valid! When the Green Light occurs it will be found on www.freedomreigns.us.

• If something is posted, do not make it viral until after confirming it through Freedom Reigns.

• Individuals will not be personally contacted when there is an alert. It will be posted on Freedom Reigns and they have compiled a list of various media sources who have asked to be contacted.

• When the Green Light is given, they (media sources) will help to let everyone know.

POLICE NEW (04/29/2012)

• Not all police are bad but there are some that are doing things like tazering people to death or being inappropriate taking people into custody.

• Make formal complaints to the state level law enforcement. What this does is this involves the FBI and other people directly in whatever transpired. It also causes the action to be investigated.

• If anyone has witnesses, etc., get their statements that they saw the police doing something that was not right.

• Do not assault the police.

• If people are just standing around and they arbitrarily pick someone, that needs to be radio recorded, that needs to be witnessed. At that point then the policeman is guilty of a crime.

• You do not have to abide by what would be called a police inquiry in the matter. You need to go down and file an affidavit that states or stipulates truth in a cause. That cause will go along with whatever arrest record or incident report that the police make. When you have substantial evidence to the contrary, especially video or pictures, when there is no reason for the action taken then that policeman can be held responsible for what they do.

RADIATION NEW (04/29/2012)

• The radiation and radiation levels are real. The problem with the reporting of it is that you cannot read the type of radiation with a standard Geiger counter. This is a different type of radioactivity in terms of the manner in which it presents itself in its physical manifestation.

• The radiation is at extraordinary high levels and it has already blanketed the United States and it is headed toward Europe and beginning to affect England at this point.

• There are things that can be sprayed through chemtrail applications that attend to these things it removes, it absorbs the radiation. Once the radiation is absorbed, there are biologics – small critters that eat atomic isotopes to neutralize them in the process.

UPDATED (05/06/2012)

• The technology for the Fukushima problem will be released with disclosure. Drake is not sure whether this technology will be part of the initial release or not.

SHAPE SHIFTERS NEW (04/29/2012)

• Certain elite Special Forces have been trained to hunt these things. The movie “Priest” shows this ideology.

• At a certain distance when they don’t know we are there, you can start popping them off. That is part of what is being done presently.

• If you see one, go back into the house. You don’t need to hide but keep a powerful weapon on hand just in case they decide to come to visit.

SPAIN NEW (04/29/2012)

• Spain has announced that they are going to a cashless society. Drake suggests people watch this situation simply because what happens there is going to give an idea as to what the adjustments they are looking for, in terms of making things right, is going to be or the manner in which the bad guys hide it. You can add France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Ireland and eventually the U.K. to the list of the people that are going to have financial problems. The shift is in progress but it does take some time to accomplish this.

SPIRITUALITY

• Good reference site that covers some of the information Drake discussed: http://humanityhealing.net/

• Drake assists with this site.

STATES (Connecting to Others) (NEW 05/06/2012)

• If you are interested in finding others in your state to connect with, the Freedom Reigns website has a way to connect here: http://frforum.freedomreigns.us/user/Discussions.aspx?id=338449. If your state is not listed, start a thread for your state.

STATES (Financial) NEW (04/29/2012)

• If states decide to have their own monetary system, Drake suggests that the American dollar be printed on one side and the state’s currency on the other. Then you have a national currency that just happens to be from that state. The problem is that some states have more wealth then others and it’s prohibitive to have an exchange rate between states.

STATES (Paperwork) NEW (04/29/2012)

• The list of states with paperwork not yet done can be found here: http://frforum.freedomreigns.us/user/Discussions.aspx?id=338446

VATICAN

• No idea when the Pope will step down but we will know about it when it happens.

• Everyone has heard of the scandals/problems within the church and those problems run to that particular individual. There are other things nastier than that that will come out that people will be shocked at.

UPDATED (04/29/2012)

• Drake doesn’t see the pope as being the center of attraction. According to the church doctrine, it states that the pope is the holy man directly in contact with Jesus Christ. That Jesus Christ, stated in the book, is the intercessor between man and God. That doesn’t say anything about the pope.

• The pope is guilty of things that even go beyond pedophilia and other concerns that the church has.

• Drake suggests that the church should cleanse itself. This should be done by the membership. Not all church officials are dirty. The ones that are left after you clean house could be your new leadership and they should be watched closely. Anything funny reported, they should be changed for someone else.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

I debated long and hard on posting this and decided it is your responsibility to investigate and decide for your self if this is true.

 

 

 

 

Global Elite Using Revolution to Ensure Obama Remains President

May 20th, 2012 by

http://occupycorporatism.com/global-elite-using-revolution-to-ensure-obama-remains-president/

 

ELECTION FRAUD

THIS IS WHAT HE WANTS!

By Susanne Posel

Occupy Corporatism

According to an anonymous source at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the upper echelon in DHS are actively preparing for public civil unrest .

The more appropriate term would be “civil war”.

The federal agencies preparing for civil war are also agitators in the facilitation of it. “The DHS takes their marching orders from the Obama administration, from Obama himself, but mostly from his un-appointed czars. Don’t think for a minute that the administration is doing anything to stabilize events in the U.S. They are revolutionaries, and revolutionaries thrive on chaos,” the anonymous source said.

DHS is not concerned with their outward appearance. They have been pushing boundaries with the TSA for quite some time. The American public in general is becoming conditioned to accept inappropriate behavior as normal.

The main focus of the Obama administration is “divide and conquer” in the sense of manufactured issues to divide the American citizens while he conquers them in plain sight.

Through economic chaos, racial division and class separation, Obama hopes to strategically cause total destabilization.

The Obama administration has operatives engaged in cover activities with the Occupy Movement, orchestrating various labor union protests, and other subversive operations within the US.

Campaign funds are being misappropriated to cover the cost of these infiltrations. Those working with the US government are agitators, sent to incite violence, destroy property and disrupt daily activities during peaceful demonstrations.

The way that the US government, through the CIA created the Arab Spring, is now being brought to American soil. Those same tactics will be implemented to usher in martial law.

The Obama administration is planning for riots in urban centers, such as New York and other major cities. Then a planned distruption of commerce will take place. This is the green light for DHS to move in under these false flag pretenses to gain control over the manufactured situation.

The use of military and federal agencies on the streets of America will commence from that moment on.

The anonymous source revealed: “They want to restrict travel, if not through high energy prices, then by checkpoints and curfews mandated by rioting and unrest. They understand we are the most well-armed nation in the world, yet they are aware of our vulnerabilities and intend to fully exploit them,” he added.

The designed strategy is to keep Obama in office for another term, no matter how unpopular he is. Obama’s work for the global Elite is not finished. Obama must put the finishing touches on changing our country from a Constitutional Republic to a Fascist Dictatorship.

This controlled chaos will cause a run-up on the elections for the end of this year. The goal of civil war with the American people would facilitate the reason to possibly post-pone the elections, thereby keeping Obama as the sitting president for another term.

As far as those in power, Obama remaining president “is what [they’ve] been working toward and [they’re] closer now than [they’ve] ever been. If [they] lose now, [they] might not have another chance.”

The Obama administration is collaborating with the Federal Reserve Bank to assist in the implosion of the US economy and a substantial devaluation of the US dollar.

The collapse of the US dollar would pave the way for the International Monetary Fund’s answer: one world currency. The IMF along with the World Bank has made formal proposals of the Bancor, a global currency that would replace all current fiat as legal tender.

Once the Euro completely collapses, the US dollar will shortly follow. Hyperinflation will rapidly sweep across the US. When this happens, the US government expects mass rioting in the streets.

The recent incident of shots being fired at the White House was supposed to be the catalyst to declaring martial law in America. The event was planned to become an assault on Tea Party members, gun owners, Constitutionalists and the myriad of citizens who simply voiced their distain regarding Obama.

The plan was for DHS to step in and assume control.

When that did not happen, DHS uppers were admonished. The agency has since become more vigilant to new opportunities and aggressive in their dealings to possibly expedite the coming governmental crackdown on American citizens.

The anonymous source warned about a possible false flag operation involving Obama and his family. The goal will be to incite racial chaos that rivals the riots in the 60’s. This is a plan B, so to speak.

Obama is desparate to remain in office. The global Elite that placed him there know that he has unfinished business and must be re-elected; even if this means creating a reason for Obama to declare the 2012 elections indefinitely postponed.

“The end-game plan for America is its destruction as a Constitutional Republic, with the assistance of the agencies under the umbrella of the DHS,” said the source.

In an eerie prediction, global Elite Henry Kissinger, speaking at a Bilderberg Group meeting in France in 1992, made this remark:

“Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government.”

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

America, pray there are enough honest men in government to indict this scumbag, find him guilty, and put him behind bars for life. Better yet, let him have George Bush, daddy, and Bill Clinton for cell mates.

 

ELECTION FRAUD

 

 

How Money Dies

May 19th, 2012 by

http://dont-tread-on.me/?p=18095

By Alasdair Macleod

There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.  Ludwig von Mises.

Our entire way of life is based off of a debt based currency that must create more debt every year in excess of the debt AND interest accrued the year before.  This is because every dollar that comes into existence is a debt with a certain amount of interest attached on to it.  When debt is created, money is created.  When debt is paid off, money is destroyed.  The real trick is that the money that is owed for the interest does not exist, since only the principle of the loan is put into the economy.  The ONLY way this interest can be paid is by more debt being created to pay the previous debt AND interest.  This is why we have an ever expanding debt that cannot stop.
“In the end we are all dead.”  John Maynard Keynes
The dollar collapse is a mathematically inevitable event.  It will also be the largest single event of human history.  At some point the debt incurred will be more than the real economy can bear and there will be a default of non payment.  Or the other way to default, is that we constantly print more money to keep the system going, that we eventually destroy the value of the currency and people lose faith in it, which leads to a rush out of it and into hyper inflationary depression.  One key aspect of this default is that Nations that owe the debts to foreigners simply default on the debt like Greece will eventually do.  But those nations like ours, that print our own debt based currency, have every single time, paid the debt with increasingly worth less currency to the point that we reach a hyper inflation.  

 When one realizes this foundation of our entire way of life has cancer  the debt, the dollar, the economy, the stocks, the real estate, the pensions, our entire current, unsustainable way of life ends.  
We can at this late date have a deflationary crash or a hyper inflationary depression, nothing is written in stone.  We can have a deflationary depression if the politicians stop creating more debt and refuse to raise the debt ceiling.  With no more debt coming into the system, we would have the mother-of-all margin calls the world over almost immediately.  The highly leveraged world of banking would be forced to de-leverage to meet their debt obligations.  This would seize the markets and the economy as a whole and it would happen all in a matter of a few days. 
Austerity is another way a deflation can happen.  When nations restrict the amount of money spent into the economy by cutting services and payments, it limits the amount of money in circulation.  Since the interest money is still sucking from the real economy, and there is no money coming back in as this deflationary action on the economy grinds to a halt and those most dependent upon those payments will be screaming the loudest.  The masses will beg and fight for more spending and eventually the politicians cave and give the masses what they want, more money.  

Every country that engages in austerity will abandon it as political pressure grows and the fact that with less government money in the system, the more the Keynesian parasitical system collapses. Tax revenues shrink faster than the spending cuts and this will increase the deficits.  This is a ploy that the bankers benefit from because austerity really means sacrificing the masses lives, so that the bankers portfolios can perform.  The politicians play this dangerous gambit because they want the people to beg them for more money.  The game they play with the whiff of deflation and then opening up the money spigots is a very successful dialectic that has empowered this parasitical ruling class for ages.

We could also have a deflationary depression if a nation like Greece defaults and the ECB does not flood the system with more Euros to cover the losses in the system.   By Greece defaulting on their debts, the banking system would seize up as banks become blatantly insolvent, as the equity in their positions are destroyed.  This again would force everyone to sell their assets in a cascading mess to cover their loses.  The deflation in the system is the most immediate and destructive choice.  It is easy to find who caused it and it is difficult for people’s confidence to return after it starts.  This is why the Fed and the ECB have been furiously working on acronym schemes like QE 1 and 2 Operation Twist and LTRO  and the secretive $16 Trillion Dollar slush funds to support the insolvent zombie banks and the system they hold up.  Once the ECB starts covering the losses in the banking system this will give cover to all other Western Central banks to print as these currencies fall relative to another.  Trillions will start flowing and the world will be rocked as it was in 2008 but this time it will not be billion dollar institutions that are broken, it is trillion dollar nations and quadrillion dollar markets.

 Our Corrupt Banking System

 

http://www.fedupusa.org/2012/05/our-corrupt-banking-system/

 

Here it comes again folks….. and it’s our fault for allowing it.

U.S. banks increased sales of protection against credit losses to holders of Greek, Portuguese, Irish, Spanish and Italian debt in the last quarter of 2011 as the European debt crisis escalated.

Guarantees provided by U.S. lenders on government, bank and corporate debt in those countries rose 10 percent from the previous quarter to $567 billion, according to the most recent data from the Bank for International Settlements. Those guarantees refer to credit-default swaps written on bonds.

That would be ok if it was known that the seller could pay because they had laid actual capital against that position.  That’s “One Dollar of Capital” and while it can lead to a nasty loss it can’t cause systemic risk because you can only bet what you have.  If you want to bet more you have to either sell bonds, sell common stock or retain earnings (first), so your position is always covered.

But that’s not what we allow.  We allow banks to simply claim they can cover it because “someone else” took the other side of the position – who is not required to prove they can clear the trade if it goes the wrong way.

Counterparty failure is another risk for banks selling insurance on the debt of the five counties. When a swap is triggered by default, a bank could find that a client who sold the protection can’t pay. The firm still has to make good on its promise to pay whoever bought protection.

And again, the problem is that there is no enforcement of a requirement that all underwater positions that are open be backed by actual capital and be proved as “good” on a daily basis.

This isn’t impossible to do by any stretch of the imagination.  Computers are really good at counting things and keeping track of such stuff.  We just refuse to force that at a regulatory level and the reason is simple: If you force people to gamble with only capital they actually have, instead of counterfeiting it through various “sleight of hand” games, then the so-called “profits” that have been “earned” by these institutions collapse inward.

The real problem with these games is that the so-called “profits” are in fact a skimming — or if you prefer looting — operation and come at the expense of everyone else in the economy.  That includes you, by the way, especially when these “bets” go bad and you get tapped to cover it.  The worst part of it is that it’s not just the explicit bailouts like TARP — it’s also the incessant skim that comes from fees on everything you do, directly and indirectly, whether the ~2% you pay on every credit or debit card transaction (yes, you the consumer pay it although you don’t see it) to the much higher prices you pay for everyday goods and services as the firms you deal with are effectively forced into the game to “hedge” the risk of pricing moves on commodities that the banks create with their proprietary trading!

We will never have sound banking — or a sound financial system — until we put a stop to this.  There is nothing wrong with speculation, but that speculation must be undertaken only with your own capital.  These are the rules that everyday people have to live with in their lives — I, and every other “retail” trader, must post actual capital against all of our positions and we’re marked at the largest time frame on a nightly basis — and sometimes more-often.

 

CORRUPT BANKING

How The U S Dollar Will Be Replaced

May 18th, 2012 by

http://www.activistpost.com/2012/05/how-us-dollar-will-be-replaced.html

Brandon Smith, Contributor

Activist Post

After being immersed in the world of alternative economic analysis for several years, it sometimes becomes easy to forget that most people do not track forex markets, or debt to GDP ratio, or true unemployment, or hunch over IMF white-papers highlighting subsections which expose the trappings of the globalist ideology. Sometimes, you just assume the average person knows what the heck you are talking about. This is, of course, a mistake. However, it is a mistake that is borne from the inadequacy of our age and our culture, and is not necessarily a product of weak character, either of the analyst, or the casual reader. 

The great frustration of being actively involved in the Liberty Movement is the fact that many people are rarely on the same page (or even the same book) during political and economic discussion. Where we see the nature of the false left/right paradigm, they see “free democracy”. Where we see a tidal wave of destructive debt, they see a “responsible government” printing and spending in order to protect our “best interests”. Where we see totalitarianism, they see “safety”. Where we see dollar devaluation, they see dollar strength and longevity. Ultimately, because the average unaware citizen is stricken by the disease of normalcy bias and living within the doldrums of a statistical fantasy world, they simply have no point of reference by which to grasp the truth when exposed to it. It’s like trying to explain the concept of ‘color’ to a man who has been blind since birth.

Americans in particular are prone to reactionary dismissal when exposed to facts that disrupt their misconceptions. Our culture has experienced a particularly prosperous age, not necessarily free from all trouble, but generally spared from widespread mass tragedy for a generous length of time. This tends to breed within societies an overt and unreasonable expectation of ease. It generates apathy, and laziness. A crushing blubberous slothful cynicism subservient to the establishment and the status quo. Even the most striking of truths struggle to penetrate this smoky forcefield of duplicitous funk.

In recent articles, I have outlined the very immediate dangers of several potential economic events that are likely to take place this year, including the exit of peripheral countries from the European Union, the conflict between austerity and socialist spending in France and Germany, the developing bilateral trade agreements between China and numerous other countries which cut out their reliance on the U.S. dollar, and the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will announce QE3 before the end of 2012. All of these elements are leading in one very particular direction: the end of the Greenback as the world reserve currency. 

In response to these assertions I have received letters from some people (some of them indignant) questioning how it would be even remotely possible that the dollar could be replaced at all. The concept is so outside their narrow world view that many cannot fathom it. 

To be sure, the question is a viable one. How could the dollar be unseated? That said, a few hours of light research would easily produce the answer, but this tends to be too much work for the fly-by-night financial skeptic. Sometimes, the job of the alternative analyst is to make the obvious even more obvious. 

So, let’s begin…

The Dollar A Safe Haven?

This ongoing lunacy is based on multiple biases. For some, the dollar represents America, and a collapse of the currency would suggest a failure of the republic, and thus, a failure by them as individual Americans who live vicariously through the exploits of their government. By extension, it becomes “patriotic” to defend the dollar’s honor and deny any information that might suggest it is on a downward spiral. 

Others see how the investment world clings to the dollar as a kind of panic room; a protected place where one’s saving will be insulated from crisis. However, just because a majority of day trading investors are gullible enough to overlook the Greenback’s pitfalls does not mean those dangerous weaknesses disappear. 

There is only one factor that shields the dollar from implosion, and that is its position as the world reserve currency. Without this exalted status, the currency’s value vanishes. Backed by nothing but massive and unpayable debt, it sits frighteningly idle, like a time bomb, waiting for the moment of ignition. 

The horrifying nature of the dollar is that it is only valuable so long as foreign investors believe that we will pay back the considerable debts that we (the American taxpayer at the behest of our criminally run Treasury) owe, and that we will not hyperinflate in the process. If they EVER begin to see their purchases of dollars and treasuries as a gamble instead of an investment, the façade falls away. Yet again this year Congress and the Executive Branch are “at odds” over the expansion of the debt ceiling, which has been raised to levels beyond the 100% of GDP mark:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/17/us/politics/obama-presses-congress-to-act-on-his-priorities.html

Barack Obama has made claims that increases in the debt ceiling are “normal”, and that most presidents are prone to hiking the barrier every once in a while. Yet, back in 2006, when George W. Bush increased debt limits, Obama had this to say:

“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can't pay its own bills…Instead of reducing the deficit, as some people claimed, the fiscal policies of this administration and its allies in Congress will add more than $600 million in debt for each of the next five years…Increasing America's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that 'the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”

For once, Barack and I agree on something. Too bad the man changes his rhetoric whenever it’s to his advantage. 

Today, Obama now asserts that raising the debt ceiling is not an opening for more government spending, but an allowance for the government to pay bills it has already accrued. This is disingenuous and hypocritical prattle. Obama is well aware as are many in Congress that as long as the Federal Government is able to raise the debt ceiling whenever it suits them, they can increase spending with wild abandon. It’s like handing someone a credit card with no maximum limit. For most men, the temptation would be irresistible. Therefore, one can predict with 100% certainty that U.S. spending will never truly be reduced, and that our national debt will mount in tandem until we self destruct.

How has this trend been able to continue for so long? Our private central bank has created the fiat machine by which all economic depravity is possible. Currently, the Federal Reserve is the number one holder of U.S. debt. The Federal Reserve creates its own capital. It prints its wealth from thin air. The dollar, thus, has become its own lynchpin. The secretive institution which has never been subject to a full audit is now monetizing endless debt mechanisms with paper promises. What value would any intelligent investor put on such a fraudulent economic system? 

The epic dysfunction of the dollar is rooted in its reliance on perception rather than tangible wealth or strong fundamentals. It is, indeed, like any other fiat mechanism, with all the inevitable pitfalls built into its structure.

Ironically, the value of the Dollar Index is measured not by its intrinsic buying power, or its historical buying power, but its arbitrary buying power in comparison with other collapsing fiat currencies. 

The argument I hear most often when pointing out the calamitous path of the dollar is that it is the go-to safe haven in response to the crisis in Europe. What the financially inept don’t seem to grasp is that the shifting of savings back and forth between the euro and the dollar is just as irrelevant to our currency’s survival as it is to Europe’s. BOTH currencies are in decline, and this is evident by the growing inflationary pressures on both sides of the Atlantic. Ask any consumer in Greece, Spain, France, or the UK how shelf prices have changed in the past four years, and they will say the exact same thing as any consumer in the U.S.; costs have gone way up. Therefore, it makes sense to compare the dollar’s value not to the euro, or to the Yen, but something more practical, like the dollar of the past….

In 1972, just as Nixon was removing the dollar from the last vestiges of the gold standard, a new car cost an average of $4500. A home cost around $40,000. A gallon of gas was .36 cents. A loaf of bread was .25 cents. A visit to the doctor’s office was $25. Wages were certainly lower, but they kept much better pace with the prices of the era. Today, the gap between wages and inflation is insurmountable. The average family is unable to keep up with the flashflood of rising prices.

According to the historic buying power of the dollar, the currency is a poor safe haven investment. With the advent of bailout efforts and debt monetization through quantitative easing, its devaluation has been expedited dramatically. The Fed has left the door open for what I believe will be a final destructive round of publicly announced QE, weakening the dollar to near death:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/16/us-usa-fed-idUSBRE84F12320120516

The question then arises; why do foreign countries continue to buy in on the greenback?

The Dollar Dump Has Already Begun

One of my favorite arguments by those defending the dollar is the assertion that no foreign country would dare to dump the currency because they are all too dependent on U.S. trade. To answer the question above, the reality is that foreign countries ARE already calmly and quietly dumping the dollar as a global trade instrument. 

To those people who consistently claim that the dollar will never be dropped, my response is, it already has been dropped! China, in tandem with other BRIC nations, has been covertly removing the greenback as the primary trade unit through bilateral deals since 2010. First with Russia, and now with the whole of the ASEAN trading bloc and numerous other markets, including Japan. China in particular has been preparing for this eventuality since 2005, when they introduced the first Yuan denominated bonds. The bonds were considered a strange novelty back then, especially because China had so much surplus savings that it seemed outlandish for them to take on treasury debt. Today, the move makes a whole lot more sense. China and the BRIC nations today openly call for a worldwide shift away from the dollar:

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/indepth/2011-08/06/c_131032986.htm

With the global proliferation of the Yuan, and the conversion of the Chinese economy away from dependence on exports (especially to the West) towards a more consumer based system, the Chinese have effectively decoupled from their reliance on U.S. markets. Would a collapse in the U.S. hurt China’s economy? Yes. Would they still survive? Oh yes. Far better than America would, at least…

In 2008, I warned of this development and was attacked on all sides by more mainstream economists and Keynesian proponents who stated that such a development was impossible. Today, it’s common knowledge that our primary creditors are “diversifying” away from the dollar, though MSM talking heads and those who parrot them still claim that this is not a threat to our economy.

To be clear, the true threat to the dollar’s supremacy is not only due to the constant printing by the private Federal Reserve (though that is a nightmare in the making), but the loss of faith in our currency as a whole. The Fed does not need to throw dollars from helicopters to annihilate our currency; all they have to do is create doubt in its viability.

The bottom line? A dollar collapse is not “theory” but undeniable fact in motion at this moment, driven by concrete actions on the part of the very nations that have until recently propped up our debt obligations. It is only a matter of time before the dollar diminishes and fades away. All signs point to a loss of reserve status in the near term. 

What Will Replace The Dollar?

My next favorite argument in defense of the Greenback is the assertion that there is “no currency in a position to take the dollar’s place if it falls”. First of all, this is based on a very naïve assumption that the dollar will not fall unless there is another currency to replace it. I’m not sure who made that rule up, but the dollar is perfectly able to be flushed without a replacement in the wings. Economic collapse does not follow logical guidelines or the personal pet peeves of random man-child economists.

Though, to be fair, and to educate those unaware, there IS a replacement already conveniently ready to roll forward. The IMF has for a couple of years now openly called for the retirement of the dollar as the world reserve currency, to be supplanted by the elitist organization’s very own “Special Drawing Rights” (SDR’s):

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/feb/10/imf-boss-calls-for-world-currency

The SDR is a paper mechanism created in the early 1970’s to replace gold as the primary means of international trade between foreign governments. Today, it has morphed into a basket of currencies which is recognized by almost every country in the world and is in a prime position to take the dollar’s place in the event that it loses reserve status. This is not theory. This is cold hard reality. For those who claim that the SDR is not considered a “real currency”, they should probably warn the U.S. Post Office, which now uses conversion tables that denominate costs in SDR’s:

http://pe.usps.com/text/imm/immc3_007.htm

So, now that we know a replacement for the dollar is ready to go, the next obvious question would be:

Why would global elites destroy a useful monetary tool like the dollar? Why kill the goose that "lays the golden eggs"?

People who ask this question are simply unable to see outside the fiscal box they have been placed in. For global bankers, a paper currency is not important. It is expendable. Like a layer of snake skin; as the snake grows, it sheds the old and dawns the new. 

At bottom, men who promote the philosophies of globalization greatly desire the exaltation of a global currency. The dollar, though a creation of a central bank, is still a semi-sovereign monetary unit. It is an element that is getting in the way of the application of the global currency dynamic. I find it rather convenient (at least for those who subscribe too globalism) that the dollar is now in the midst of a perfect storm of decline just as the IMF is ready to introduce its latest fiat concoction in the form of the SDR. I find the blind faith in the dollar’s lifespan to be rife with delusion. It is not a matter of opinion or desire, but a matter of fact that currencies in such tenuous positions fall, and are in the end replaced. I believe that the evidence shows that this is not random chance, but a deliberate process, leading towards the globalist ideal; total centralization of the world under an unaccountable governing body which operates a global monetary system utterly devoid of transparency and responsibility. 

The dollar was a median step towards a newer and more corrupt ideal. Its time is nearly over. This is open, it is admitted, and it is being activated as you read this. The speed at which this disaster occurs is really dependent on the speed at which our government along with our central bank decides to expedite doubt. Doubt in a currency is a furious omen, costing not just investors, but an entire society. America is at the very edge of such a moment. The naysayers can scratch and bark all they like, but the financial life of a country serves no person’s emphatic hope. It burns like a fire. Left unwatched and unchecked, it grows uncontrollable and wild, until finally, there is nothing left to fuel its hunger, and it finally chokes in a haze of confusion and dread…

Brandon Smith is the founder of Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense. Join Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better or contribute to their Safe Haven Project. You can contact Brandon Smith at: brandon@alt-market.com

 

CORRUPT BANKING

 

 


SEO Powered By SEOPressor