Log in



Categories » ‘Congress’

To Ignore Principles Is To Invite Chaos

May 3rd, 2017 by

https://newswithviews.com/to-ignore-principles-is-to-invite-chaos/

Read More Articles by Ron Ewart

PRINCIPLESHuman newborns, no matter what culture or geographical location, are very much like computers with empty hard drives.  You can fill the hard drive with truths, (say a well-written program that can be an excellent tool) or you can dump garbage into it and have it produce gibberish.  Babies are also like sponges and they absorb everything that their five senses ingest, either good or evil.  Babies are not pre-programmed for good.  They can be molded into any type of human their handlers want them to be.  If babies are left to their own resources, should they survive to adulthood, they become the sum of all of their inherited characteristics and all of their experiences and how their mind processes those experiences.  We have previously described this process in our “Little Black Box” Theory.

But babies are not responsible for whom or what they become, their parents and their teachers are.  That is a huge responsibility that way too many folk take lightly.

So we as parents and teachers have a choice.  We can instill solid “principles” of right and wrong, self-reliance, discipline, compassion and responsibility in our charges, or we can instill incarnate evil, dependence on government and everything in between.  Or, we can allow them to be brainwashed, as is happening in our public schools and colleges today.  But if we do nothing, the outcome of our children and what they will become is unpredictable, as they will be subject to random influences.  Under random influences, a child has the possibility of becoming a Hitler, a George Washington, or a derelict, depending upon the principles, or lack thereof, that have been recorded on their “hard drives”.  But whatever we do, or don’t do, for or against our children, can have a profound effect on history and future generations.

A couple of thousand years ago, a set of moral “principles” were handed down to the peoples of the time.  “Principles” that have stood the test of time and that have been the bedrock of at least two major religions whose heartbeat started in and near Jerusalem in what is now Israel.  Those principles have been the fabric and foundation that have kept these religions alive and going strong, for well over 2,000 years.  Splinter religions that strayed from, or significantly altered the “principles”, fell by the wayside and disappeared from view, or became ineffectual fringe elements, or outcasts, or cults.

Countries and cultures are a great deal like the minds of young babies.  They can either establish a set of strong principles to govern them selves, or allow them selves to be subject to random influences, or worse, in their apathy and indifference, allow their governors to usurp unlimited powers.

There is an inviolate law of nature that was set down by scientists of the 19th century as the second law of thermo-dynamics.  It is called the law of entropy.  In simple terms the law states that any entity, any living body, has only one path from present to future and that path is from order to disorder.  A body with heat, in time, loses that heat.  A cell or cells in an organism eventually wear out and die.  The orbits of planets and moons ultimately decay and they sometimes crash into their suns, or their host planets.  Suns, like our own, use up their energy and in time, burn out, expand into red giants and then collapse into very dense white dwarfs.  Even our Universe may be headed for what scientists call heat death, where all heat is dissipated to nothingness and only deep cold is left.

But like many laws, there are some exceptions.  It seems that there is another mysterious force at work in our Universe, wherein order emerges from chaos and instead we get the opposite of entropy.  Massive supernova explosions of giant stars spew out elements, billions of miles into the surrounding void, elements that are manufactured in the bowels of the dying star from nuclear fusion.  Over time those elements coalesce into huge clouds of gas and the gas clouds then begin to collapse under gravity and form new stars that heat emerging planets, upon which on some, life is born.  Thus, from the death of a star, from order to disorder under the law of entropy, comes order in the form of new suns, planets and life, and in some cases intelligent life.  All life and inanimate matter on earth is made up of the elements that were manufactured in massive star supernovas.  And by some operation of principle, or law, those elements assemble themselves into objects with form and purpose, like stars, planets, rocks, water, plant and animal life.

On Earth, at least, a plant rises up out of the moist, rich soil from a tiny seed no bigger than a few grains of sand.  Its journey through life is preordained.  It cannot sway from the goal set for it by its genetics, chemistry and biology.  Those limits are its “principles”.  Somewhere along the way a bud forms on the end of a stalk or tendril of the plant and in but a few days, erupts into a splendor of color and a soft, enticing shape; each plant having its own unique form.  Deep inside the flower, which it has now become, lies the makings for its offspring and with a little help from other creatures, the chemical means to allow it to reproduce.  Soon it is visited by a host of flying insects and birds and from that embrace and the ultimate distribution of the contents of its interior, the seeds are sown for a new generation of the species.

In contrast, human beings of Earth are far different than the plant, even though they too come from a seed.  Humans possess what all plants and most, if not all animals, do not possess.  Humans have pre-programmed into them volition, free choice, an ego, an id, a will to determine their own direction, their own future.  But humans, without adherence to sound principles, invite chaos and can wander aimlessly, without purpose, or create havoc among the rest of the population, like Hitler, Stalin, or Mao.  Many of these hapless souls become easy pray for governments looking for votes ….. or slaves.

As we go about the business of work and play in America, as we sit at the dinner table with each member paying more attention to the electronic device in their hand than to the people at that table, as we seek mindless television entertainment, as we indulge in destructive behavior or mind altering drugs, as we ignore what is happening in the world around us, or holding accountable those that govern us, we are ignoring the principles of our freedom and we are allowing this generation to descend into the chaos of slavery, which then impacts all future generations.  How can the people act against tyranny if they are unaware of, or choose to ignore, a clear and present danger, from foreign or domestic enemies, especially domestic enemies?

It is written that eleven score and twenty-one years ago, ‘our founding fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty’, in which the unalienable rights, granted to us by our creator, were codified into a set of “principles” under our Constitution.  ‘And to secure these unalienable rights, governments were instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.’  (How many of you feel you are giving consent to the government?)

‘Now we are engaged in a time’ of contentious conflict, confusion, turmoil and division, amongst our own people, severely ‘testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.’  But without adherence to and the defense of the “principles” upon which this great nation was founded, the law of entropy will surely lead us from order into chaos and we shall crumble and decay into socialism, despotism, or a dictatorship, as have all past nations who toyed with freedom throughout the history of man and lost it.   The future of freedom is in our hands, but only if we fiercely adhere to the principles handed down to us by the brave and courageous men and women who forged America, in a time of turmoil, conflict and confusion.

Author Don Porter recently wrote:  The United States was established as a society of individuals who were free, by and large, to engage in any occupation or economic enterprise without the government interference of regulation.  A society where people through their own efforts could accumulate wealth in amounts unlimited by government interference.  They could do with that wealth as they pleased, spend, invest, save, donate it, or throw it in the river if desired.   It was the Founder’s belief that America could do more for the rest of the world by giving them an example of how a nation could prosper through a society of individuals free from government interference in their lives, living free and governing themselves, a way of life in which the government had very little power to tax, regulate, or take care of them except protection from foreign intervention.

My plea to every American all over this great nation of Individual Freedom, is to educate and enlighten ourselves to what is happening to America by the direction the people of this Socialist movement is taking us.  We must awaken ourselves and recognize the ominous signs of the sinister and threatening danger, which these people and their backers are attempting to implement upon the people of this Free Republic.  The real danger is ignoring the Constitution and becoming a nation of people whose lives are regulated by them through our Federal Government.

To Ignore the Principles” contained in the U. S. Constitution and the intent of the framers “Is To Invite Chaos” into our lives.  We assembled some of those basic principles in our “18 Principles For Freedom” document. 

But as we have said before, these are just meaningless words if no one believes in them, or are unwilling to act in their preservation and defense.

Who among you will “Preserve and Defend” these principles?

© 2017 Ron Ewart – All Rights Reserved

PRINCIPLES

What Kind of People Callously Celebrate Unprovoked War?

May 2nd, 2017 by

http://www.arkansasfreedom.com/

NO THOUGHT BEYOND THE DOLLAR

WAR

By Joe McCutchen

Times Record editorial Sunday, April 30, 2017

Title: Report shows how vital military is to the area.

“Everyone knows just how important the military is.” “ (If you don’t, you should.)”

Equating dollar income with death, destruction & torture is the depth of depravity and debauchery. Building an economy through force of war and celebrating it is tragically deranged.

The editor’s celebration of the now ongoing 16 years of preemptive, unprovoked 7 wars, now Syria, replete with a U.S. military presence in 160 countries, naval armadas in the Yellow, Mediterranean, So. China & Sea of Japan, along with the Persian Gulf, attest to the fact insanity prevails as shown by this editor that celebrates war as a source of revenue is indeed as demented as the occupants of the D.C. Swamp, no exception. I failed to note the numbers of American troops strewn across these 160 sovereign nations in their pursuit of Armageddon. Do you get the picture?

Huge numbers of American troops are on the Latvian & Estonian borders complimented by F-35 overflights, contiguous with Russia (certainly not an enemy) and huge concentrations in Poland are a sure sign that peace initiatives are never to be implemented. Unfortunately American citizens have assumed the role of passivity through ignorance, laziness, fear, indoctrinations, conditioning & other maladies, while the madmen in DC—Boozman, Cotton, Womack, & all the others, mostly Republican neocons, busily weave their web for in all likelihood a nuclear conflagration resulting from their quest for global hegemony. 

Editor, you and the millions of American enablers enjoy your billions of taxpayer dollars built on murder, torture, destruction, poverty, and all the other inhumane products resulting from in this case 8 unprovoked wars, and more to come.

Much of our nation is behaving like a collection of uncivilized banshees celebrating, cheering, flag waving at the sight of any military contingent. The military’s only proper job is to defend our sovereighty & secure our national borders & nothing else.

Twice decorated, Medal of Honor winner Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler said it best, “War is a Racket”.  The real heroes of this decade are Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, & Bradley Manning, who have in all likelihood surrendered their lives to make Americans aware of the government police state surveillance of every citizen around the Globe by the FBI, CIA, NSA, & a host of others.

Enjoy your sordid blood money!

Joe McCutchen

www.arkansasfreedom.com 

WAR

  

Reply to Bundy Stand Off: – – A Century of Abuse

May 1st, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/reply-to-bundy-stand-off-century-of.html

COMMON LAWBy Anna Von Reitz

Doctor Coffman  forgot or doesn’t know one particularly vitally important fact:  Andrew Jackson paid off the debt that western state land originally secured back in 1804.  

There has been no valid debt against our land since 1804 in the western states or any other state.  This is an unforeseen affect of the fraud.  Though the perps have tried their best to harm us and palm off their debts, they can’t have it both ways at the same time.  

Can George down the street make you liable for his debts?  For example, can he go to the garage and have his car repaired in your name?  No? 

So why is everyone standing around “accepting the debts” of the Territorial and Municipal United States “as if” the debts of these foreign entities were yours? 

Wake up!  Here are the magic words:  “Non-Assumpsit”. 

Stop assuming that you owe the debts of the foreign Territorial United States and equally, stop assuming that you owe the debts of the foreign Municipal United States.  

These entities which claim to “represent” you — don’t.  

They have pretended to be your agents.  They’ve told you that.  They’ve told other people that all around the world the same lie.  

But the fact is that they haven’t been your representatives since the passage of their very own corporate XVIIIIth Amendment.  They have had no Fiduciary relationship to you or your states at all for a hundred and fifty years!  

And without a Fiduciary capacity, they have no ability to sign contracts, no ability to obligate you in any manner whatsoever.  Neither do the municipalities formed under their territorial government auspices. 

They got around this fact by deceit—- fraud, in other words.  

Here’s an example:  “Congress” passes an act changing the meaning of “state, States and United States” to mean “the territories and District of Columbia”.  (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.     Bear in mind that at this point in history “Congress” wasn’t acting as any Congress related to you or your states of the Union.  It was acting as the governing body of the “territories and District of Columbia”. 

A second similar “redefinition” makes “United States” equivalent to “District of Columbia Municipal Corporation”—– much to the dismay of certain parties in the Philippines who thought they had a contract with the “United States” when in fact all they had was a contract with a defunct corporation. 

Don’t you all think its time you heard the birds sing again? 

Whatever these yahoos have done and whatever they are claiming, they are wrong.  They have no jurisdiction related to the Bundys.  They have no ability to claim the lands of the western states.   All the “western states” have to do is organize their actual land jurisdiction government and accept the federal lands they are owed.  So do it.  

Follow the steps I have given you.  Surrender the “FEDERAL PERSON” named after you, expatriate back to your actual birth right political status, form your county jural assemblies, then your state assembly—– and claim your land back to your own ownership. 

It is past time for all of you to get up on your hind legs and learn your own history and operate your own government.   Thanks to the Fifty States Claim you still have a  home state to go “home” to and a government to operate it.   

Dr. Coffman has shed light on the history of the abuse of the western states and their land holdings by the federal government and its agencies— entities that have at best a proprietorship—- but the whole truth of the matter is that we have allowed this abuse by our failure to operate our own actual state governments.  

Most people have forgotten or never known the essentials facts.  

Our states are our nations.  We are born as Wisconsinites, Minnesotans, Texans, Floridians, and so on.  That’s why state banks are national banks.  That’s why we are a union of fifty nation-states, not a nation of fifty-seven “states of states”.  

We have let the “hired help” run rampant for so long that they have assumed that they are in charge and are the actual beneficial owners.  Time to inform them — and the rest of the world — otherwise. 

The Bundys have begun that noble effort— and maybe they did it without all the facts firmly in view, including all the lies that have been told about them and about us and about our states — but in truth.  

And the truth shall set you—and the Bundys—- free.

 

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

COMMON LAW

This Lawsuit Could Shatter ALL Federal Gun Control Laws

April 26th, 2017 by

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/04/no_author/end-federal-gun-control-laws/

By Bob Owens
Bearing Arms

The federal trial of a Kansas man for manufacturing and selling  firearms and silencers without a federal license could very well turn out to be the pivotal case that not only challenges the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934, but also every federal firearms law ever passed in a battle that will determine whether it is the states or the federal government that has the constitutional right to pass gun laws.

Put bluntly, this could be huge.

When Shane Cox began selling his homemade firearms and silencers out of his military surplus store, he stamped “Made in Kansas” on them to assure buyers that a Kansas law would prevent federal prosecution of anyone owning firearms made, sold and kept in the state.

The 45-year-old Chanute resident also handed out copies to customers of the Second Amendment Protection Act passed in 2013 by the Kansas Legislature and signed by Gov. Sam Brownback, and even collected sales taxes. His biggest selling item was unregistered gun silencers that were flying out of the shop as fast as Cox could make them, prosecutors said later. One of those customers – 28-year-old Jeremy Kettler of Chanute – was so enthusiastic about the silencer that he posted a video on Facebook.

Current Prices on popular forms of Silver Bullion

But last week a jury found Cox guilty of violating federal law for the manufacture, sale and possession of unregistered firearms and silencers. Kettler was found guilty on one count for possessing the unregistered silencer.

Thank God I Had a Gun:… Chris Bird

The case could reverberate across the country because it cites the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, pitting the federal government’s right to regulate firearms against the rights of states. The judge overseeing the case expects it ultimately to end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

At trial, defense attorneys contended their clients believed the Kansas law made their activities legal, arguing they are “caught in the crossfire” of the struggle between the state and the federal government over gun control.

Cox and Kettler were convicted under the National Firearms Act, which is a part of the Internal Revenue code enacted under Congress’ power to levy taxes. The case raises the question of whether that taxing authority can be used to regulate firearms that stay within state borders. Advocates for state’s rights also contend such guns do not fall under Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce.

After a decades-long wait, we finally appear to have a case that is likely to see the United States Supreme Court have to directly examine whether the Founding Fathers meant what they said when they wrote amendments to a federal Constitution that was designed to tightly bind and constrict the reach of the federal government.

What most 21st Century Americans simply do not grasp is that the Constitution and Bill of Rights were not written to to give rights to the citizens of our then-new nation, but was instead written to tightly constrain the federal government.

Deadly Force – Underst… Massad Ayoob

The Founders had just won a long and brutal war against a far-away foreign government, and the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were locked in a power struggle on just how much power the federal government in a swamp on the Potomac River would be allowed to have. The Federalists were concerned that the federal government would be anemic and far too weak to be of any use at all, while the Anti-Federalists wanted the power to remain where they felt it belonged, with the states, so that the people in each state could determine what is best for that state’s citizens.

The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to placate the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, and was mean to be ten strong chains binding down the then-puny federal leviathan to prevent future abuses.

The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights was written by Founding Fathers who understood the right to bear arms as a natural human right that the Creator bestowed upon each and every human being. How can there be any other right, if the right to defend your life is not the most paramount right of them all?

They almost felt it silly to have to codify a natural right that was so obviously self-evident to them, but knowing that a federal government unchained is a federal government tyrannical, they ratified the basic human right to bear arms within the Second Amendment.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Get it through your heads demorats, governments do not give us preexisting rights, they only try to take them away.

GUN CONTROL

The post-war Jefferson Davis: The famous trial that never was

April 24th, 2017 by

http://southernheritage411.com/truehistory.php?th=065

 

By Bill Ward

When the War Between the States ended, the victorious Northerners viewed Jefferson Davis, as the former President of the Confederate States of America, much differently than others who had served the Confederacy.

For example, when Robert E. Lee surrendered to U.S. Grant at Appomattox Court House, the meeting between the two generals was amicable. Lee was received and treated with courtesy as a senior officer. The terms were so apparently lenient, with Grant conceding to Lee’s requests on behalf of his soldiers, the surrender was referred to as “a gentleman’s agreement.”

However, even after signing a loyalty oath, Lee and other former Confederate Army officers and members of the CSA government were later disenfranchised and treated as second-class citizens. But in the eyes of the northern public, Jefferson Davis was set apart for still a different kind of treatment.

On May 10, 1865, about a mile from the town of Irwinville, Georgia, Federal troops captured Davis. With his arrest on that spring morning, his government ceased to exist. His wife, Varina, and their children were sent to Savannah, where she was kept under virtual house arrest and forbidden to leave the city. Because the soldiers, carpetbaggers and Union supporters treated the Davis children so badly, Varina arranged for them to go to Canada along with her mother.

Davis had been taken back to Virginia and imprisoned in Fort Monroe, where he would stay for the next two years. At first, he was bound in leg irons. Guards watched him around the clock but were not permitted to speak to him. He was allowed no visitors; a light burned in his cell day and night; and his only reading material was a Bible. His treatment was a clear violation of the Bill of Rights.

Many Northern Congressmen and newspapers were nothing short of vicious in their public attacks of Davis. They wanted to see him tried for treason and hanged. In one article, and in one very long sentence, the New York Times referred to Davis by every insulting comment and offensive name that was fit to print. Rhetoric far outran legal reasoning.

But if Davis was in an unusual legal predicament, so was the United States government. The dilemma faced by Washington was how to handle the Davis case. The government under Lincoln had created its own major obstacles by spending four years proclaiming that secessionists were “traitors and conspirators.” The U.S. military had silenced opposition to the administration by closing down newspapers that dared challenge the party line or to make the slightest suggestion that secession might be legal. Thousands of Northerners had been jailed for exercising their First Amendment rights, and those thousands had friends with long memories in the Northern bar.

Northern lawyers were angry for having their clients locked in prison with no civil rights as guaranteed by the Constitution; having civilians tried by military courts for non-existent crimes; having a government that ignored the Supreme Court, setting itself above the constitutional plan of checks and balances. They didn’t like having to beg the president for justice for clients convicted by phony courts-martial or locked up for long periods without any trial. Under Lincoln, the U.S. government had become tyrannical, and certainly anything but a free and constitutional society.

The best lawyers of the day were willing to volunteer to defend Jefferson Davis, because they were angry at the way Lincoln’s government had trampled the Bill of Rights and the Constitution for four years. Even those who didn’t believe in secession were repulsed by the conduct of the Republican administration and the U.S. military.

Charles O’Connor of New York, one of the most famous trial lawyers of the era and a man of great stature in the legal profession, volunteered to be Davis’s counsel. Salmon P. Chase, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, would be the trial judge.

But interesting things began to happen, and the government’s dilemma became even worse. University of Virginia Law Professor, Albert Bledsoe, published a book, “Is Davis a Traitor?” Bledsoe methodically took apart the case against secession, delivering a solid blow to the prosecutors and dampening their zeal to try Davis. Prosecutors actually began to look for a way to avoid trying him without vindicating the South.

Then another method was decided on for prosecution. The attorney general would bring in outside, independent counsel, as we have seen in modern times, such as in Watergate or the Clinton scandals. The government needed someone of great standing in the legal community to be the lead prosecutor. It chose John J. Clifford. But after reviewing the case, Clifford withdrew citing “grave doubts” about the validity of the case. The government could “end up having fought a successful war, only to have it declared unlawful by a Virginia jury,” where Davis’s “crime” was alleged to have been committed.

President Johnson, Lincoln’s successor, thought the easiest way out would be to pardon Davis, as he had pardoned many other Confederates. But Davis refused, saying, “To ask for a pardon would be a confession of guilt.” He wanted a trial to have the issue of secession decided by a court of law — where it should have been decided to begin with — instead of on battlefields. Most Southerners wanted the same.

Northerners either forgot or were unaware of a great secessionist tradition in America. Southerners were not alone in their view that each state had the right to determine its own destiny in the Union. The procedure for joining the Union also applied to withdrawing from the Union.

That thought harkens back to an editorial by the Cincinnati (Ohio) Daily Inquirer, in the summer of 1861, after the “traitor” label was let loose by the North: “The Republican papers are great on treason. . . . It is treason to circulate petitions for a compromise or peaceful readjustment of our national troubles . . . to question the constitutional powers of the President to increase the standing army without authority of law . . . to object to squads of military visiting private houses, and to make search and seizures. . . to question the infallibility of the President, and treason not to concur with him. . . It is treason to talk of hard times; to say that the war might have been avoided. It is treason to be truthful and faithful to the Constitution.”

A year after John Clifford withdrew, the government appointed another special counsel, Richard Dana of Boston, who had written the novel, “Two Years Before the Mast.” But after reviewing the evidence, he agreed with Clifford; the case was a loser. Dana argued that “a conviction will settle nothing in law or national practice not now settled…as a rule of law by war.” Dana observed that the right to secede from the Union had not been settled by civilized means but by military power and the destruction of much life and property in the South. The North should accept its uncivilized victory, however dirty its hands might be, and not expose the fruits of its carnage to scrutiny by a peaceful court of law.

Now, over two years after Davis’s imprisonment and grand jury indictments for treason, the stage was set for the great public trial of the century. Davis had been released from prison on a $100,000 bond, supported by none other than Horace Greeley, the leading abolitionist writer in the North and a former Lincoln supporter. Greeley and a host of others were outraged at the treatment Davis had received, being locked up in a dungeon for more than two years with no speedy trial.

Since two famous special counsels had told the government its case was a loser, finally, none other than the Chief Justice, in a quirk of Constitutional manipulation, devised an idea to avoid a trial without vindicating the South. His amazing solution was little short of genius.

The Fourteenth Amendment had been adopted, which provided that anyone who had engaged in insurrection against the United States and had at one time taken an oath of allegiance (which Davis had done as a U.S. Senator) could not hold public office. The Bill of Rights prevents double jeopardy, so Davis, who had already been punished once by the Fourteenth Amendment in not being permitted to hold public office, couldn’t be tried and punished again for treason.

Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase secretly passed along his clever argument to Davis’s counsel, Charles O’Connor, who then made the motion to dismiss. The Court took the motion under consideration, passing the matter on to the Supreme Court for determination.

In late December 1867 while the motion was pending, President Johnson granted amnesty to everyone in the South, including Davis. But the Davis case was still on the docket. In February 1868, at a dinner party attended by the Chief Justice and a government attorney, they agreed that on the following day a motion for non-prosecution would be made that would dismiss the case. A guest overheard the conversation and reported what was on the minds of most Southerners: “I did not consider that he [Davis] was any more guilty of treason than I was, and that a trial should be insisted upon, which could properly only result in a complete vindication of our cause, and of the action of the many thousands who had fought and of the many thousands who had died for what they felt to be right.”

And so, the case of United States versus Jefferson Davis came to its end — a case that was to be the trial of the century, a great state trial, perhaps the most significant trial in the history of the nation — that never was.

Olddogs Comments!

So much for honest lawyers and politicians! When will you folks understand that people seeking office, power, or money cannot be trusted because they don’t work for us. They work for the International Investment Banking Cartel who claims to own the world. Everything you think you own really belongs to them and your taxes really amount to rent.

HANG THE BANKERS!

POLITICIANS

JIM PORTER SPEAKS FOR THE PEOPLE

April 22nd, 2017 by

jporter2327@yahoo.com

Hello to All,

Several months ago I backed away from most group discussions discussing America’s problems, as I hadn’t found a group willing to focus on America’s problem(s) truth, as evidenced by America’s history. It does no good to preach to the choir.

I believe our American written history is the key to highlighting our Creator’s intention for this great country. The history exposes the individuals writing our truths while also exposing those individuals violating America’s truths. For the most part the individuals are our congress members.

Over the last few months, America has witnessed Americans individually being jailed in the name of justice, while after several months the history exposes these individuals were simply removed from their fight to expose government corruption and name the individual government employees responsible for what is simply a violation of our law of the land by the crime of treason (a war like act of a citizen against their ‘country’; to which I want to add, a ‘country’ built to represent the People, and by the wish of the People provide the People life security.).

These arrested, individual Americans had our countries best interest at heart. This recent history shows the concept of best intention is good, but also shows we still need a perfected game plan to remove our current corrupt government employees now, so ‘We, the People’ can review America’s history and correct results of crimes committed years, even decades and centuries ago.

This message string started over a writer’s article about repeal the 16th.

America’s history clearly and easily proves the 16th is not a constitutional amendment, and not a law of the land. Ron V. makes a valid yet incomplete point defining the unconstitutional status of the 16th, but until the American People understand the truth behind the 1861 reason, the American People will never enjoy America as set forth in our federal constitution. AND HERE IS WHY!

The following is not in order of importance because everything holds equal value, so….

1) Nowhere in America’s federal constitution is ‘Power’ granted to the united States federal government.

***Can anyone reading this message tell how many Articles make up America’s federal constitutional contract of ‘We, the People’ granting power to branches of our federal government for the good of the People? (without looking it up)

***THE ANSWER IS 7 ARTICLES, AND AFTER THE CONSTITUTION RATIFICATION, ARTICLE 7 HAS NO MORE BUSINESS. Article 7 addressed the rounding, decimal point from whole number, for the number of colonies needed for constitutional ratification of transfer of power from the People to a limited federal government.

Since the article writer that started this message string is relying on this federal constitution, I feel all should know the constitution.

2) ‘Power’ (operational authority by instructions to members for the good of the People) is granted to a federal legislative branch known as congress which is organized into two branches by choice of the People, a Senate and a House of Representatives. The House was then unconstitutionally altered by the fraud of the currently known 14th amendment, and the Senate branch was altered by the fraud known as the 17th amendment. These fraudulent moves were perpetrated during the 19th century, because other frauds perpetrated during the 18th century were allowed to continue, and this bring us, the American People, to the moldy crust on the problem.

3) Article 1 grants all legislative ‘Power’ clearly states, (ratified in 1788)

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the united States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.

4) A Office of Profit is an Executive Appointment, and as this executive appoint is not from the united States, the appointment is from a foreign state.

5) The title esquire is a British executive appointment discussed and proven by the Order of Precedence of England, and this constitutional statement makes it the crime of treason for individuals known as attorney, but not lawyer, to hold government employment in any domestic government position across America to this day.

6) As no state can issue Titles of Nobility, the exclusion of People called attorneys from government employment in county, state and federal positions such as judges demanding to be addressed by the title ‘Your Honor’, and district attorneys (officers of the court) set forth in state constitutions is complete, yet not enforced.

America’s current judicial system fails the People because the People can sue People, and the government is currently suing People, but the People have no mechanism to sue the government individuals in control of the People’s government.

7) Many American People today continue to believe America’s government is just, and this is exampled by the work of the writer stating to repeal the 16th amendment. How can this unconstitutional action be repealed? To repeal an action, the action must be lawful so an unlawful action cannot be repeal. It can be thrown away, but to know this the People need to learn why the action was unlawful.

What is happening today is simply the government and non-government attorneys know that individual People screaming for repeal of unlawful action(s) are in fact stating the People don’t know lawful, or shit from shine-Ola.

The history of then future American constitutional frauds is discussed in articles which became known as the federalist papers The articles were written during the drafting of America’s federal constitutional contract to discuss what could be ratified and what needed to be added by fake amendment.

What the attorneys had going on in the Colonies during the 1760’s and 1770’s was simply a greedy power struggle between International B.A.R. members bantering for control of the colonies which translated into control of the colonist for control of the colonial wealth.

For the inquisitive mind, the International B.A.R. was and still is a syndicated crime ring of attorneys willing to enjoy what they steal from non International B.A.R. members.

8) The international B.A.R. has been around a long, long, long……..time, long before the 1750 colonial prosperity. The international association is sooooo secretive a quick search finds no result.

9) The American B.A.R. was started in 1878 which is important to know for several reason, one of which is to know the international B.A.R preceded the american B.A.R. If Lincoln was a B.A.R. member, and the A.B.A.R. was not around until after his death, he was a member of the International B.A.R., just like those wanting control of the colonies!

The colonial B.A.R. members didn’t want to share their spoils with the British attorneys, so the colonial attorneys hatched their plan to break away from their English conspirators.

The colonial attorneys devised a plan to separate the colonies from the British holding, and to do this the colonial based attorneys needed the support of the colonial People, and this required a written plan which later became our federal constitutional contract.

The attorneys started pushing back against British control, and eventually the American Revolution started in 1775 with a declaration of separation of the colonies from the British Empire. As attorneys have no heart, feelings or character they relied on the character of the colonial People. The attorneys drafted the Declaration of Independence as an international notice of separation document based upon Creator rights they planned to steal from the People later.

What the attorneys struggled with then, as they do today is simply their lack of compassion resulting in their inability to recognize human compassion. This simple weakness allows attorneys to ‘think’ what they do will not be discovered by People with compassion for their fellow human being(s).

During the drafting of America’s federal contract, the attorneys, then allowed in colonial government before the ratification of the document that prohibited them from government employment in the country they designed, discussed through articles which latter became known as the ‘Federalist Paper’s’, the different constitutional aspects of their criminal plan.

10) The most problematic issue they discussed was the unconstitutional nature of Common Law rule. (does anyone see the similarity between common law and common core?)

The federalist, which I call honest People, demanded no more bull shit from a titled individual knowing a title is not the measure of men.

The exclusion of common law from the law of the land simply made individual opinion a foreign thought. As the attorneys were forced to include the clause of no government employment because of foreign executive appointment without congressional consent, they negotiated the future of a bill of rights through the public article found in the federalist papers, to be added to our federal contract later in 1791. This article admits what was to be added later in 1791 was not constitutional and would prevent the ratification of the entire constitutional document the attorneys needed for separation from their British crime syndicate competitors.

The plan of the colonial attorney crime syndicate was simple, as the American Colonial People were busy making a living and didn’t want to deal with worldwide negotiation(s).

The attorneys took their best shot at greater colonial control by writing for ratification the federal Constitution, then after ratification of the contract, waited for the right time to make alteration/altercations to that documents while hoping their criminal plan would not be discovered, or that the attorneys would not be replaced/removed from government positions created.

This is evidenced by studying the first meeting of the federal supreme court, a week long meeting were nothing happened because the federal constitution known as the law of the land was so complete the People could administer their own problem solving courts at their local level so the federal courts were useless. By the ‘Law of the Land’ found in Article 6, the attorneys were out of control of the nation they designed and intended to rape and pillage.

The first federal supreme court meeting was convened on Feb. 2, 1790 and after a week the attorneys knew something needed to be done quick, to protect their position or their efforts would be lost. They recognized what needed to be done would also be unconstitutional, but that was of no concern to the attorneys as they consider(ed) America theirs, not the People’s.

Without going into much greater detail I’ll wind this message down by saying;

doing the right thing for the wrong reason does not work. Look at what the dumb ass attorneys did starting in the 1750, they started working to build the greatest country on earth for the wrong reason. They wanted to rape the People instead of enjoying the benefits of their work.

The attorneys stayed in American government office after they made the design unconstitutional, so they knew every single congressional action signed by a single attorney must be thrown out now once discovered. This is not to say the thought of the action is not sound, but to all seemingly sound action there is a hidden perk for the attorneys to screw over the American People.

This is very evident in the fraud of Dodd-Frank and the obama care debacle. These federal frauds, currently considered federal code, protect attorneys while screwing ordinary (none government employed) Americans. Why do you think the attorneys in our last congress returned the obama care fix without a vote? Its because to make the fix they had to remove the protection the attorneys rely on to stay in office, THAT’S WHY!

O.K., so I’m going to make another point before signing off……

The Dodd-Frank Act, known as the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection act IS NOT about finance reform, IT IS A FEDERAL CODE ALLOWING INSURANCE FRAUD TO ALLOW CRIMINALS IN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT TO STAY IN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT, and to do this the code prevents the arrest of known government criminals by current law enforcement. Dodd-Frank must be thrown out to get with throwing out obama care, and there is the problem the congress members know, but most American People do not. Even our current white house resident doesn’t know the truth, but that is because he is refusing a meeting with me for me to present the truth to him. I will show him the government documents to back up what I have written. The president is also doing the wrong thing(s) for the right reasons so nothing is happening to benefit the People.

Now I will go, but first I want to say an Article 5 convention will be the death of 

America. WHY?

The attorneys will change the part about no attorneys in government and that my friends be the end of America.

The American attorneys now have their American B.A.R. so they will not have to share with the British attorneys. As that was the original intent, the attorneys don’t need an America by the federal contract, just wait till they write a contract without giving a shit about you or me.

Jim Porter

ATTORNEYS

Exactly Why the Trump Administration Needs to Cooperate

April 13th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/exactly-why-trump-

administration-needs.html

Foreign Corporations

By Anna Von Reitz

Frankly, everyone hates the United States. A lot of people claim to hate “America” but what they are talking about is always the United States, instead. This is a misunderstanding that needs to be cleared up.
“America” and the “United States” are two completely different things.
They are foreign with respect to each other and always have been. America is the fifty republican states of the Union: Oregon, Idaho, Florida…. The United States/UNITED STATES is fifty-seven “States of States”— corporate franchises of foreign Territorial and Municipal corporations: State of Idaho and STATE OF IDAHO, for instance.

It’s the United States/UNITED STATES that has raped and burned and pillaged and polluted and rampaged all over the Earth. The clueless Americans have been duped into believing these foreign corporations were their own dear lawful government.

Now that they know that the thing is Washington, DC, is just a “government for hire” operation, and they perceive that they have been duped and used and abused and cheated and plundered and imposed upon by the same corporations that have been doing it to the rest of the world, the Americans have cause to hate the United States, too.

With the Americans on one side and the outraged rest of the world on the other, what’s the United States to do?

The perps have tried to move their base of operations to China, but that isn’t working out so well for them. Nobody who wants to gain weight eats a tapeworm.

These so-called “Federal Corporations” still have a lot of power, but it is all power they either stole or borrowed or defrauded from the American states and people that they have claimed to represent and serve. Without the Americans backing them, they dwindle down to nothing but wind. Even Puerto Rico won’t try to find the best part of them.

This, politically, and a hopelessly corrupt government bookkeeping system, is what President Donald J. Trump is faced with.

Anyone looking to him to help them drain their local swamps will be sadly disappointed. Instead, he needs our help to drain his swamp in Washington, DC.

And that is why he needs to cooperate fully with the restoration of the American land jurisdiction states and expedite the return of Americans to their native political status and encourage the restoration of the American Common Law courts and accept the use of our asset-backed monetary system— because without our help and support, the so-called Federal Government doesn’t have a prayer.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Foreign Corporations

The Fifty States Claim Update + FBI Informers, the Bundys, and Watering Horses

April 11th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/the-fifty-states-claim-update.html

POLITICAL IGNORANCEBy Anna Von Reitz

It has come to my attention that there are still a lot of people left out in the dark regarding the Fifty States Claim and even some who woke up in alarm and thought that we’d missed the boat.
When all the crappola of the Civil War came down, there were people in America who were aware of the fraud and who objected to it.

In order to make their own actions “legal” but not “lawful” the renegade Rump Congress agreed to “grandfather in” those who were already in this country, if they expatriated back to their original native state jurisdiction. Anyone who didn’t would be presumed to be a “citizen of the United States”.
That’s how it came down in July of 1868 and that’s the way it remains to this day.

So as the vermin were busy liquidating their most recent fabricated government services corporation and bankrupting others in 2015, the American states (together with the people living in those states) were presented as sureties backing all this nonsense and the actual states— our land jurisdiction states— were up for grabs. Unless the Priority Creditors showed up and claimed the states back, the Secondary Creditors would be allowed to come in and seize everything in sight.

The banks and various other nations were slavering at the thought.
So I put out the call for white males above the age of 21 (the requirement back during the Civil War Era) who could prove that their ancestors were here back then. I asked them to execute Acts of Expatriation— which they did. Volunteers from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) researched the family genealogies and we invoked the Grandfather Clause and the Expatriation Act to reclaim every sand particle of the fifty organic states of the union for the actual American states and people.

All that got done and done successfully. We made the international claim. We posted the Notices. We posted the Liens. We went back and recorded everything. We posted the sovereign bonds for each one of the fifty actual states and for all the people living in the states.

We also turned our attention to asset recovery, because there were billions upon billions of dollars worth of fungible assets belonging to the actual states that were also in limbo and under threat of being lost. So we alerted the military (which is responsible for safeguarding our money) and they jerked awake.
Since then, the military’s Asset Recovery Team has been responsible for repatriating billions of dollars worth of gold and silver to this country. It is estimated that it will take another six to nine months to collect our stuff back from all over the globe and from offshore accounts.

Someone had to deal with the international and commercial issues and someone had to make the effort to get the counties and states organized and the people educated enough to run their own government again.
Why do you think they had all those FEMA Camps set up, folks?

They were getting ready to open the doors and let their Creditors come in and seize your homes and land and businesses and everything else in sight as payment for their corporate debts.
We saved the land and its assets. We reclaimed the actual states. That much is done.

What remains is to educate and organize the American people and get them back in condition to run their actual government— first at the county level, then at the state level, and finally at the national level.
I have had to rely on volunteers to do this and they have not always known the right thing or done the right thing. It is also likely that to some extent the effort has been undermined by paid agents seeking to keep us all from regrouping and successfully reinstating our lawful government.

Be that as it may, we stand on the cusp of a new era.

Please pray throughout this week in whatever way you can for the well-being of the land and the people of this nation and of all nations.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

FBI Informers, the Bundys, and Watering Horses

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/fbi-informers-bundys-and-watering-horses.html

POLITICAL IGNORANCE

By Anna Von Reitz

Ask yourself this question: if there are any “FBI Informants” operating in the take-down of the Colorado Grand Juries and State Justices— where are they?

Chances are they are in jail with the rest of the folks, so that they can continue to spy on and manipulate them from a position of trust.

They are certainly not standing here as I have been for yea, so many weeks, giving warning and instruction to people so that they might correct their ways and avoid arrest.

I hear that my name and that of Bella Haywood have been taken in vain and certain parties who are in fact to blame for this debacle have been accusing us of being traitors and informers and so on.

The plain fact is that if these people had followed our advice or even just paid attention to the Public Law they wouldn’t be arrested. There would be no big controversy.

I’ve also been getting a lot of mail about the Bundys. Save the Bundys! Save the Bundys!
The Bundys have had the benefit of my advice and the facts since Day One of their arrest. I explained it to them and I will explain it to all of you again.

United States Citizens and “citizens of the United States” have no constitutional rights. At most, they have “equal civil rights”– but those rights are at the discretion of the Congress and the courts. This is why that federal judge felt that she could afford to laugh in their faces and threaten them with contempt of court for mentioning The Constitution.

They are being tried under false presumptions in a court that is totally foreign to them. They are being tried as “US citizens” and with the possible exception of Ryan Bundy, they have done absolutely nothing to rebut that presumption.

They could get an authenticated copy of their Birth Certificate,  accept it as “Drawee” on the front of the document and then endorse it over on the back to the United States of America, U.S. Treasury Without Recourse— and make Steven T. Mnuchin the Fiduciary responsible for AMMON BUNDY, for example.
That would very neatly separate them from the PERSON that is on trial.

They could also post a very hefty Private Registered Indemnity Bond with the Treasury and use that to insure (indemnify) themselves against any charges brought against AMMON BUNDY—- which is just a ledger ACCOUNT that the rats in Nevada are bent on pillaging.

They could ask to see the Bid and Performance Bond related to their case. If they did this in open court the clerk would poop green goo, but have no choice but to produce the incriminating evidence.

They could then accept those Bid and Performance Bonds for Value, charge them off against their Indemnity Bond, and return it to the same laughing Judge and make her laugh out of the other side of her ugly face.
And if no Bid and Performance Bonds were forthcoming, the Prosecutor would have to pay for the whole proceedings out of his pocket and the Judge would have to dismiss.

There have to be two dozen things that they could do to walk out of that court as free men, but no, they won’t listen.

Just like Bruce Doucette wouldn’t listen. And Michael R. Hamilton won’t listen. And Randy Drew wouldn’t listen. And Terry Trussell wouldn’t listen. And Tim Turner wouldn’t listen. And so many, many, many others.
They all insist on calling themselves some kind of United States citizens. They all insist on answering to names. They all insist that they have constitutional rights when United States citizens have never had constitutional rights in over two hundred years…. They all have to try to snow the court under with fancy common law documents that don’t apply and reams of case law that don’t apply.

They just can’t connect to the fact that they are being dragged through a commercial court in international jurisdiction.

And when I try to tell them this, they pause, stare blankly at me, and then go right on with whatever they were doing anyway. It’s like the information hits a “bumper” in their brain and they just reject it like a pinball being tossed aside.

So, please, everyone, this is what I have had to deal with. It isn’t that I haven’t tried or failed my duty to share information or anything else. I have talked and shared until I am blue in the face—- to no avail.

You can lead a horse to water, but….. if the “horse” wants to go to jail, then at a certain point, you just step aside and let him.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

POLITICAL IGNORANCE

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 – – Reply to Arnie Rosner

April 10th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/article-1-section-8-clause-17-reply-to.html

CONFUSSION

By Anna Von Reitz

Stop putting words in my mouth!  I never said there was no Constitution.  The original one is still in effect—so long as there are any actual American nationals and State Citizens willing to hold the rats accountable. 

Read Article I, Section 8, Clause 17.    It grants Congress the plenary government of the District of Columbia.  So they created the Territorial Government of the United States, and following the Insular Tariff Cases of 1900-1904, they created the Territorial States of States. 

Within the District of Columbia also exists the Municipality of Washington, DC—- which the Congress also enjoys plenary control of.  So they created the Municipal Government of the United States, too. 

And each of these has “citizens”—- Territorial Citizens and Municipal citizens. 

We are not naturally citizens of anything.  “Citizens” as I have too often tried to explain to you serve the government.  “Nationals” are the people the government is obliged to serve. 

But you all stupidly claim to be “citizens” and are proud of it, too.  Well, so long as you claim to be “citizens” you have no Constitutional rights and never did have in the entirety of the existence of this country.

So far as it goes, everything that they have done, they are allowed to do by Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17.  That’s what you and the rest of the flatheads down on the farm don’t get.  And that’s how you get in trouble.  You constantly mistake their territorial and municipal governments for the republican form of state government that we are owed, and which no longer operates because we are deluded and confused and have been defrauded into not operating our own government.

Though it is our right and duty to do so. 

I am so frustrated with you and with them that I could slap you all silly.  You are like drunks staggering around raging and butting your heads against the wall and talking nonsense. 

 

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

 

 The Fifty States Claim Update

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/the-fifty-states-claim-update.html

By Anna Von Reitz

It has come to my attention that there are still a lot of people left out in the dark regarding the Fifty States Claim and even some who woke up in alarm and thought that we’d missed the boat.
When all the crappola of the Civil War came down, there were people in America who were aware of the fraud and who objected to it.

In order to make their own actions “legal” but not “lawful” the renegade Rump Congress agreed to “grandfather in” those who were already in this country, if they expatriated back to their original native state jurisdiction. Anyone who didn’t would be presumed to be a “citizen of the United States”.
That’s how it came down in July of 1868 and that’s the way it remains to this day.

So as the vermin were busy liquidating their most recent fabricated government services corporation and bankrupting others in 2015, the American states (together with the people living in those states) were presented as sureties backing all this nonsense and the actual states— our land jurisdiction states— were up for grabs. Unless the Priority Creditors showed up and claimed the states back, the Secondary Creditors would be allowed to come in and seize everything in sight.

The banks and various other nations were slavering at the thought.
So I put out the call for white males above the age of 21 (the requirement back during the Civil War Era) who could prove that their ancestors were here back then. I asked them to execute Acts of Expatriation— which they did. Volunteers from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) researched the family genealogies and we invoked the Grandfather Clause and the Expatriation Act to reclaim every sand particle of the fifty organic states of the union for the actual American states and people.

All that got done and done successfully. We made the international claim. We posted the Notices. We posted the Liens. We went back and recorded everything. We posted the sovereign bonds for each one of the fifty actual states and for all the people living in the states.

We also turned our attention to asset recovery, because there were billions upon billions of dollars worth of fungible assets belonging to the actual states that were also in limbo and under threat of being lost. So we alerted the military (which is responsible for safeguarding our money) and they jerked awake.
Since then, the military’s Asset Recovery Team has been responsible for repatriating billions of dollars worth of gold and silver to this country. It is estimated that it will take another six to nine months to collect our stuff back from all over the globe and from offshore accounts.

Someone had to deal with the international and commercial issues and someone had to make the effort to get the counties and states organized and the people educated enough to run their own government again.
Why do you think they had all those FEMA Camps set up, folks?

They were getting ready to open the doors and let their Creditors come in and seize your homes and land and businesses and everything else in sight as payment for their corporate debts.
We saved the land and its assets. We reclaimed the actual states. That much is done.

What remains is to educate and organize the American people and get them back in condition to run their actual government— first at the county level, then at the state level, and finally at the national level.
I have had to rely on volunteers to do this and they have not always known the right thing or done the right thing. It is also likely that to some extent the effort has been undermined by paid agents seeking to keep us all from regrouping and successfully reinstating our lawful government.

Be that as it may, we stand on the cusp of a new era.

Please pray throughout this week in whatever way you can for the well-being of the land and the people of this nation and of all nations.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

CONFUSSION

Your Mission, If You Decide to Accept It…..

April 9th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/your-mission-jim-if-you-decide-to.html?utm

_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2

Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++

Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

ACTION

By Anna Von Reitz

Everyone –every American– needs to stop a moment and focus on this one true thought: that thing that you have thought of all your life as your government, isn’t your government.  

Say it over and over and over.  Write it down if you need to.  Really, truly, think about this fact and what it means: its not your government.  

Your government has been dormant, left on a shelf for 150 years. 

Repeat as many times as necessary.    

This circumstance was accomplished via fraud and deceit and illegal usurpation; as a result, you have a chance to restore your lawful and actual government. 

Repeat as many times as necessary.  

To restore your lawful government you have to decide to function as an American state national, for example, a Texan or a Wisconsinite,  not as a “United States citizen”.  

You need to inform the federal authorities of your decision and retire from any presumption of federal service. The exact means to do this quickly and cleanly is being refined and will be made available. 

The next step is to form your local unincorporated jural assemblies.  

The jural assemblies then restore your local unincorporated land jurisdiction government, including your county courts.  

The counties then form your lawful land jurisdiction state.  

The states then send delegates to a Continental Congress, and whatever changes need to be made, get made.  

This is the mission.  All other missions are subordinate to and depend on this one. 

This is a lot of work, but it isn’t insurmountable.  In the process of doing this work you will rediscover your history, restore your courts, fill your vacated public offices, and resume operation of your own lawful government.  

Because every county and state is unique and has its own history, this isn’t a cookie-cutter proposition.  

The good news is that other counties have broken the trail for you and they stand ready to help you. 

The Michigan General Jural Assembly hosts a nationwide conference call every Thursday night beginning at 9 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.  The call-in number is: 1-712-770-4160, Access Code: 226823#.  [Please note the change from “4170” to “4160”. I had the wrong number posted in a couple places—typo.]

They also host a website at: http://1stmichiganassembly.info

And from 2 p.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Thursday, they have established a Hotline: 1-989-450-5522.   

 

Thanks to the Michigan General Jural Assembly, you won’t have to recreate the wheel and won’t have to face this daunting task alone.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

ACTION

Arrests

April 7th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/arrests.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_

medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramer

feedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++

Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29

By Anna Von Reitz

Everything has a logic.  Rain falls down, not up.  Fire can warm your house or burn it down.

In this country, we have two kinds of government.  We have the de facto government — Federal/Territorial/Municipal —- that is hired to provide stipulated services.  We have the de jure government which, if we have a brain in our heads, we serve and cherish as our means to direct and control the de facto.  That’s the way it is and the only other option is insurrection.

Some time ago I separated myself and my Living Law team from Bruce Doucette and Michael R. Hamilton and “Judge Micky” and various others who started out with the goal of restoring the lawful de jure government, but then, went off track. 

This is not my first rodeo and not the first time I have had to do this.  Patriot leaders and the groups they establish regularly become convinced that rain falls up and fire doesn’t burn.

Now I hear that Bruce Doucette and several others have been arrested and are facing sixteen felony counts. There will probably be more arrests to come. 

You can live under the Statutory Law or you can live under the Public Law. You can sail on the sea or stand on the land—- and that’s ultimately your choice.  What you can’t do is willfully wobble around in between and just make things up as you go. 

You are either a United States citizen or a non-citizen national— and whichever it is, you have to obey the laws and take the lumps that go with that political status.  

Fish or fowl. 

Here’s an example: you can’t claim with one breath to be a Colorado State Judge and with the next breath claim that you have authority as a judge in Oregon, too.  It doesn’t work that way.  Land jurisdiction offices are tied to the land and have strict geographic boundaries. 

I have explained that fact hundreds of times, but it just went in one ear and out the other with some people.  They kept on claiming to have authorities here, there, and everywhere.

 I had one woman tell me she was a “United States Justice of America”— a totally made-up name for a non-existent office, yet she insisted that she had universal authority in all fifty states and she wanted a badge to prove it, too. 

Yes, Virginia, there really are wing-nuts out there.  And they are dangerous.  They are dangerous in and of themselves, because they do crazy things and make crazy claims of power and authority based on thin air, but more importantly, they are dangerous because they mislead other people. 

There are a lot of disgruntled, unhappy Americans out here in the trenches and many have righteous complaints; unfortunately, we’ve also been dumbed down and kept ignorant so that most people don’t know how their government is supposed to work and some won’t take the time and make the effort to learn, much less implement it.  

They want to go out and do their own thing. Damn the torpedoes. Damn the law. Damn the limitations of old, outmoded public offices. We are the people, we can do whatever we want! …..And so on.

Inevitably, such people come to the attention of the FBI and other agencies and just as inevitably they get arrested— because what they are doing and encouraging others to do, is wrong.  

Left to the mercy of such leaders we could wind up with the Glory Rangers of America at our door, parading around and lording it over the rest of us with no rhyme or reason to anything.

Once you leave the tracks our Forefathers built, it’s too easy to devolve into a world of Simon Says or Bruce Says or Anna Says, a world in which there are no rules beyond raw power, and no law but public sentiment. 

That’s why, even though I am saddened by this turn of events, I am relieved also.  All an insurrection does is harm innocent people on both sides of the fence.  

So, let me refocus everyone on the actual job at hand and the step-by-step process:

Getting your own political status cleaned up is Job One.

Getting your local county jural assembly together is Job Two.

Getting your local unincorporated county government up and fully functioning is Job Three.

After that, your counties will form your land jurisdiction states. 

Your states will then be enabled to call a land jurisdiction Continental Congress together.

And whatever changes need to be made in our relationship with the hired government can be made via peaceful and agreed upon processes.  

To assist you in getting your local county jural assembly up and on its feet, the Michigan General Jural Assembly is hosting a Thursday night call, nine o’clock p.m., EST, 1-712-770-4170, access code 226823#, and they also offer help through their website at http://1stmichiganassembly.info.  

Please bear in mind that every state and every county in this country is unique.  That’s part of the beauty and the strength of our country, but it also means that you have to do your own homework.  There is a Handbook that shares the process that Michigan went through, but it isn’t a template per se, because all 3100 counties are different and all 50 states are different.  

If you want to be free, come prepared to do some real work.  

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Global Collateral Accounts- -What’s the Hold Up, and The Truth About Contracts?

April 5th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/global-collateral-accounts-whats-hold-up.html

CORRUPTIONBy Anna Von Reitz

Today, I got an email from a group of Greek bankers asking me if the “Global Collateral Accounts” are real and why they can’t seem to get action releasing those funds even after allocations have been made and published?

Well, yes, there are Global Collateral Accounts that do contain assets that belonged to people long dead and whose specific heirs are not known, and as a result those assets belong to the world-at-large and there is really no reason to leave them sitting around in bank deposit boxes and tranche flats doing no earthly good.

Fair enough.  So some years ago a great housecleaning effort began in the Swiss vaults and has continued from there.

Unfortunately, most of the banks involved in the house cleaning effort used the opportunity to try to get rid of evidence of their own wrong-doing, tried to cheat depositors out of interest the banks owed, and otherwise pulled very shady deals claiming that huge amounts of assets were “abandoned” by legitimate trustees and known beneficiaries when they really weren’t abandoned at all—-a larger scale version of the fraud these same banks have pulled by claiming that you abandoned all the mortgage payments that were made to YOUR NAME’s undisclosed escrow account over the years.

The irony is that most of these “Historic Trusts” belong to people who have no interest in wielding huge amounts of money and who want the assets used for the same or similar purposes as the Global Collateral Accounts are meant to serve—that is, they are willing to serve the same philanthropic purposes as the Global Collateral Accounts.  They simply aren’t willing to stand by deaf, dumb, and blind and let the banks make false claims of abandonment and seize the assets.

Every time one of the supposedly “abandoned” Historic Trusts pops up a hand and says— Hey, wait a minute, those assets belong to us.  We didn’t abandon anything!—-the whole process has to be shut down and re-calibrated. The assets of the Historic Trust being claimed back have to be backed out of the Slush Pile.

A lot of time and bother could be saved if the banks just gave proper Notice to the last known address of the last known trustees and beneficiaries, but they are afraid to do so for a wide variety of reasons.  If you don’t know that you are the heir of a billion dollars, shouldn’t you know?  Where have you been all this while?  Are you for real or just some con man sniffing around?

It was the same thing with the gold confiscated from our great-grandparents and grandparents back in the 1930’s, which the World Bank and IBRD claimed as Secondary Creditors.  If I hadn’t raised my hand and said—- Oh, by the way…..  those assets and all the years of interest owed on them would have been rolled into the Global Collateral Accounts.

Even more importantly, it was the same with the assets of the land jurisdiction states of America.  Imagine what would have happened if nobody stepped up to the plate and claimed back the land you are standing on?   This was a major league play by the banks. They actually thought they could get away with claiming that the American states had been abandoned and were available for resettlement and redistribution of all their assets.

So as you can now see, there’s a lot going on in the background and a lot of dirty deals have been pulled by the banks including a lot of false claims of “abandonment of funds” and “abandonment of assets” which have been made for both innocent and self-interested reasons.

All that bosh keeps holding up settlement of what is and is not legitimately part of the Global Collateral Accounts. More and more heirs and beneficiaries and trustees and fiduciaries keep coming out of the woodwork and showing reasonable provenance and basis to claim assets back out of the banker’s Slush Pile.

Every time we think we get it done, or “close enough to call”— pop! Someone else shows up at the table and produces a receipt for a thousand Gold Certificates from 1904, or the last scion of one of the Conquistadors crawls out from under a rock in Costa Rica and says, “Uh, well-ah, Senor…….”

If we are fair and if we are honest and if we care about what is true, we owe each and every one of these claims investigation and settlement.  And that takes time, especially in view of the amount of fraud and graft and collusion and general bad behavior by too many of the banks involved.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

The Truth About Contracts, Parse Syntax, and Us

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/the-truth-about-contracts-parse-syntax.html

By Anna Von Reitz

I don’t believe that people or their institutions have any ability to contract.  It’s simply not within our temporal nature and skill set. We can’t guarantee that we will live another minute.  We can’t know what time it is in any absolute sense.  We can’t even describe where we are, physically, without arbitrary references.  

For mortals who don’t know where they are and don’t know what time it is to make contracts obligating themselves to do things in the future—-is obvious madness.  We are incompetent and fundamentally unable to do any such thing, so all contracts are void ab initio, for intrinsic fraud. 

We are like mice trying to dictate the life cycle of horses.  Making contracts is simply not something we can do, so we ought to stop pretending otherwise.

Once we acknowledge the facts of our limited nature and circumstance we are prepared to deal with things — including ourselves — as we really are.  

If we accept our natural limitations and humbly agree to the best of our ability on a course of action, that is not a contract.  That is a Good Faith Agreement.  

If we further make the effort to express that agreement in a way that is mathematically sound and unequivocal, using Parse Syntax, it in no way confers any supernatural power to keep the agreement; rather, Parse Syntax makes sure that the agreement says exactly what it says, no more and no less, and cuts out confusion and arguments–which is surely something much to be desired.  

For myself I prefer a simple honor code in which we let our yes be yes and our no be no, as the Bible says, and to the extent possible, let our word be our bond— accepting always that “time and unforeseen circumstance” may derail our most earnest efforts and intentions and forgiving each other when that happens. 

The concept of “Good Faith” is not difficult, but it is not possible to maintain when we pretend and tell lies about ourselves and our limited abilities.  Nor is Good Faith something we can maintain without sincere effort and clear communications.  It is in this last capacity that Parse Syntax can serve humanity in noble purpose: put an end to the use of slippery, slithery, descriptive language when making business agreements. 

Parse Syntax, properly and honestly defined, is an “iron rod”.  If not an absolute safeguard against misunderstanding, it is as close as we are likely to come until the day that we can communicate telepathically and record the sum total of all thoughts, intentions, and feelings associated with an agreement. 

Most of my days I spend immersed in sorting out confusions that are the result of both honest and dishonest actions. People regularly come away from the same conversation with different assumptions and they take different actions accordingly. This causes no end of confusion and discord, even when it is done innocently and for no dishonest purpose.  Imagine how crazy it gets when people purposefully seek to confuse things and defraud others?  

Parse Syntax can help people deal more clearly and honestly with each other.  That isn’t always what people want to do, but Parse Syntax can go a long way toward ensuring that result. 

I would guess that if Parse Syntax were used to express Good Faith Agreements, 99% of the expense and misery associated with today’s commercial court system could simply go away.  

And wouldn’t that be a blessing?

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

CORRUPTION

Whence Technocracy: Neofeudalism, Peasants and Pitchforks

April 4th, 2017 by

https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/07/06/whence-technocracy-neofeudalism-peasants-pitchforks/

Wikipedia

Written By: Patrick Wood

C.H. Smith nailed it: “There is no avenue left for advocacy, grievances or redress in a system dominated by global corporations.”

In the old feudal days, peasants with pitchforks and torches could assault the lord’s castle on a hill. Today, there is neither castle nor even a hill. Yet, we still have the same grievances, angst and desires for peace, safety and prosperity.

Smith writes,

The reality is there is no avenue left for advocacy, grievances or redress in a system dominated by global corporations. The castle on the hill doesn’t exist; it is diffused all over the planet, and well protected by state minions controlled by neofeudal corporate interests.

Do you really think it’s mere coincidence that small business growth has imploded in the era of corporate dominance? As I explained yesterday in Governments Change, the Corporatocracy Endures, central banks dropping interest rates to near-zero for financiers and corporations sealed corporate dominance of finance and governance. There are few opportunities for small businesses when the financial and political structures serve neofeudal corporate interests.

Corporate power destroys democracy. That is the heart of neofeudalism.

Let me explain what happened here.

In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote Between Two Ages: America’s Role In The Technetronic Era. Three years later in 1973, Brzezinski teamed up with financier David Rockefeller to start the Trilateral Commission that was dedicated to “fostering a New International Economic Order.” Brzezinski explained,

“The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multi­national corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.” –  Between Two Ages

Antony Sutton and I wrote (Trilaterals Over Washington, I and II) and lectured extensively on this in the late 1970s. It’s too bad that more people didn’t listen to us back then, but the establishment made sure that we were thoroughly marginalized and discredited. In fact, the nation’s largest book chain at the time, B. Dalton Booksellers, blatantly black-listed our books by sending out a memo to all their stores that stated, “Trilaterals Over Washington is out of print and the publisher is out of business.” Neither was true, but it killed our sales.

So, what part of Brzezinski’s statement above is unclear?

Was Between Two Ages some sort of literary equivalent to Hitler’s Mien Kampf in which he laid out the elites’ plans in terms so clear that nobody would believe them?

Whatever the case, Brzezinski envisioned the “ultimate solution” in his carefully defined “Technetronic Era.”

What is the “Technetronic Era”? Plain and simple, it is a vision rooted in historic Technocracy from the 1930s.  It is also the resurrection of feudalism with many new twists thanks to advanced technology. Thus, the term neofeudalism fits Technocracy or Technetronic perfectly: A few own all the resources and then tell everyone else what they can or can’t do on planet earth.

In 1938, The Technocrat magazine defined Technocracy as follows:

“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population… “

This is exactly what is happening today: social engineers working with global corporations to take over the entire economic and social landscape. Thus, society is being ‘scientifically’ reengineered to serve the corporate lords. The old-fashioned terms of ‘supply’ and ‘demand’ don’t apply any more. Consumer demand is artificially manipulated to soak up whatever global corporations decide they want to manufacture.

In other words, Technocracy is a complete takeover of both the means of production and consumption, a feat never before attempted nor achieved in the history of the world.

You might never have heard of Technocracy before, but can you feel the manacle of scientific dictatorship tightening around your neck?

In my opinion, this is why Britain recently voted to leave the European Union, which is openly called a Technocracy in the European press. This is also why Trumpism is accelerating in America.

Simply put, people don’t have to understand the cause in order to feel the pain.

Oh, would that there were a castle on a hill that we could assault and demand that our grievances be heard. However, because Technocracy and Technocrats are so thoroughly infused into society, institutions and corporate culture, it is impossible to hold their feet to the fire.

(Permission is granted to repost this article but only with complete attribution to the author and link back to the original page.)

Olddogs Comments!

The time has come and passed for all good men to get their head out of their ass, learn how we were captured, how severe the danger really is, grab our guns and ammo and take back our banks, government, and freedom.

Declaration of Independence: A Transcription

HAVE YOU EVER READ IT?

Note: The following text is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation has been updated by Olddog.

In Congress, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighboring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Ignore History and it will bite you in the ass!

PURE EVIL

 

 

Blood Oath Fulfilled

April 3rd, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/blood-oath-fulfilled.html

BLOOD OATH

By Anna Von Reitz

Yes, I have a blood oath standing on the altar of the Universal Catholic Church.  Please note that the Universal Catholic Church is not the Roman Catholic Church, but the far, far greater Church at large.  

My Blood Oath clearly states to you— as it did to Cardinal George of Chicago (see the actual letter addressed to him that is part of my archive at www.annavonreitz.com)— that I was putting my life and soul at risk to bring forward the Great Fraud against the American states and people for remedy.

In fact, under ecclesiastical court rules, nobody who isn’t prepared to hazard their own life and soul against me in this matter is allowed to offer rebuttal.  And nobody has. 

Not a peep in rebuttal or denial of what I have said about the cheating and defrauding and press-ganging and breach of trust against the American states and people has ever been heard in the years since I placed my Blood Oath before the Vatican Chancery Court and the Holy See and I am sure that no such denial or rebuttal will ever be made, because what I have said is true and verifiable.

Anyone who tried to come against me would lose not only the argument, but would burn in eternal Hell according to Catholic Doctrine for placing my life and soul at risk for the sake of a self-interested lie.

It’s like playing poker.  When the bid is insurmountably high, nobody takes it.  And I placed the bid insurmountably high for the sake of the truth and my country and my countrymen and my True Lord, Jesus, who is not dead and not a dead body, either.

The Bible teaches that the soul is in the blood. 

So when you seal testimony in blood, it is sealing the truth of it with your soul. 

Most of you have been deposed or given statements before Notary Publics or vows before clergymen— promises that you have made to the best of your ability, oaths to tell the truth under penalty of perjury in admiralty courts, affirmations of truth in civil courts, and all of this is accepted as normal due process that people should be held accountable for telling the truth and should give some sign of consent to be punished if they are found to be willfully prevaricating. 

When you seal testimony in blood before the highest ecclesiastical and equity court in the world—-and you are bringing charges against the Roman Pontiffs and British Monarchs for fraud, theft, and breach of trust and commercial contract for the last 150 years– you had better believe that you have to post a bond backing your testimony in the most absolute and unequivocal terms possible: a blood oath. 

I knowingly, willingly hazarded my life and eternal soul as punishment for any willful lie— but I also called the Cardinals, Pontiffs, and Monarchs on the carpet under the same risk. 

The fact that not one of them offered as much as a whisper—ever—in rebuttal tells you that what I have said is true and that my judgment in the matter stands as The Law binding upon the court, the Holy See, and their property managers at the Vatican and also upon their vassal lords.  They quite literally have nothing to say and therefore have to accept my decisions and pay whatever remedy I demand. 

My decision was to redeem the Kingdom of God they created in the name of the Kingdom of Heaven, which is my Lord’s and founded on His Love, His Blood, His Soul, His Rule of Peace, His Law of Love, and His Father’s Law of Free Will. 

The world is so utterly messed up, so violent, so confused, so deluded, so full of excrement and idolatry and vengeance and stupidity and lies of every kind that it must be remade in a different form. 

The old paradigm of the Holy See was pagan in origin and based on the Doctrine of Scarcity, a cruel yoke which presumes that everyone is guilty and that there is never enough of any good thing.  As a result, all commercial economies were reduced to being run on a premise of eternal debt and indebtedness.  One could only pay one’s debts with more debts, sins with more sins, conflicts with more conflicts, until physical death released us from this Hell Hole that Satan and his servants made of it. 

Thus they had determined to live and force everyone else to live until such time as a physical manifestation of Jesus appeared and released the prisoners and redeemed the kingdom.  That has now been done.  Against all odds, I have appeared as His Fiduciary, fulfilled The Law and the Prophets, bound Satan, and My Lord has put him under my feet according to His Word. 

The new paradigm of the Holy See is to be made wholly in the image of Jesus and based on the Doctrine of Abundance, wherein every being is deemed innocent and there is enough of all things for men to live in peace and in the enjoyment of their own homes and where there is no such thing as debt held against us.  Instead, there will be credit afforded us, more than enough to fulfill the needs of every man, woman, and child, more than enough to build each community, clean up the environmental damage, and ensure that there is no longer any need for war or hunger or want or disease or death or crying. 

The entire debt-based system is being reversed and henceforth for 1,000 years it shall stand until the Final Test and the Lord of Heaven comes again.   

Your only requirement will be to keep the peace, love yourself and others equally, and respect the free will of others insofar as it hurts nothing. 

I would beg each one of you to make it your business to get up each day and make this world a better place, by whatever means you have, both small and great.

Beyond that, there is no true law, for our Father does not demand that you worship Him, though I say that all those who live and breathe and have their being in Him ought to worship our Father, for in All There Is there is nothing more or else or apart from Him to worship and so, all else is delusion—a matter of worshiping the creation instead of the Creator, or worshiping only a part of Him, as if He could be separated from Himself. 

Please bear in mind that aside from my willingness to serve Him, I have no great merit of my own; it is His Merit that has established the Kingdom of Heaven, His Wisdom that established its Law, and His Credit which pays all debts forevermore.  It is the Most Humble of the Most High who has won the Everlasting Victory and it is in His Name and the Name of His Kingdom that I have come and set my blood upon the cornerstone in defiance of The Lie and the Liars. 

So this is the meaning of my “Blood Oath” and this is why it was required of me and also all the many other years and ways of trial that brought me.

Those who are afraid of my Blood Oath have cause to be afraid, for it stands against their Master and his demons and all those who secretly serve him as the entrance to their grave; those who say that I have acted as an “agent of the Vatican” mistake my role and place, for I have not come to argue with property managers but to contend for the Throne of Grace.  

Surely, you have heard all your lives of Evil in High Places?  Surely, you have wondered how such Evil could be overthrown?   How, but for the Truth, issuing forth from His Mouth, who first named them the Synagogue of Satan?  How, but for the willingness of living flesh to obey Him and contest in the realm of the Spirit against the Princes of the Air? 

I am only a foot soldier of the True Lord; the equivalent of a lowly Lieutenant Colonel.

Try to imagine the glory that comes after? 

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

BLOOD OATH

End the States Monopoly on Policing

April 1st, 2017 by

https://mises.org/blog/end-states-monopoly-policing

POLICE STATE

by Tate Fegley

Compared to the general population, advocates of a minimal state and those of a stateless society overwhelmingly agree on a vast majority of political issues. I wish to argue here that there should be at least one more agreement between them than there traditionally has been: policing services need not be monopolized by the state and would be more efficiently provided by the private sector.

Almost every individual who has argued for the desirability of having policing services provided in a free market does not stop there, but applies the same reasoning to other services monopolized by the traditional minimal state and thus conclude that a stateless society is optimal. Unconvinced minarchist libertarians, given the choice between their ideal minimal state — one that provides policing, courts, and the military — and a stateless society, will tend to stick with the former.[1]

An alternative that is seldom considered, however, is one in which private enterprise competes to meet consumer preferences for policing within a state system. Such a framework is immune to criticisms of the stability of a stateless society, such as that by Tyler Cowen, who argues that arbitration networks in a stateless society would eventually collude and resemble a state.[2]

In this alternative framework, where the state still possesses a monopoly on the legitimized initiation of force within a geographical territory, concerns such as protection agencies enforcing very disparate legal rules are moot. These agencies would only enforce generally recognized property rights (that is, rogue agencies violating property rights would be opposed by both other agencies and the state).

A non sequitur frequently made by those advocating a minimal state — including Robert Nozick, who argued that there is a natural monopoly in the field of providing police protection — is that a monopoly on the use of force necessarily implies a monopoly on policing. After all, the marketplace already provides numerous policing services and amenities including burglar alarms, locks, rent-a-cops, and bodyguards, not to mention services such as Neighborhood Watch and emergency services substitutes such as the PeaceKeeper App. When we consider “policing” to include the things many want government police to do as well as the goods and services purchased in the market for security, we notice that having a comparative advantage in the use of physical violence does not necessarily cause one to be the most successful service provider. People want police to be courteous, conscientious, and reasonable; they do not simply want them to be the best martial artists or sharpshooters.

POLICE STATE

We also notice that the quantity and quality of security demanded far outstrips the quantity supplied by government police. No great imagination is needed to describe a world where policing services are provided by private enterprise within a state: this is the world in which we currently live. As I have written previously:

[T]here are an estimated 3 persons employed in private security for every public cop. … Private policing isn’t some fantasy, and it isn’t just a luxury enjoyed by the rich: every time you enter a shopping mall, go to a department store, visit an amusement park, enjoy a live professional sporting event, or use PayPal, you are being protected by people trying to maximize profit.

All we need imagine are these services being provided on a larger scale. Precisely how these services would be provided would be determined by entrepreneurs and the competitive process. Compared to the centralized, bureaucratic policing with which we are familiar, we would likely see far greater emphasis on prevention (rather than responding to crimes after they have occurred), de-escalation tactics with violence being used as a last resort (since entrepreneurs, rather than taxpayers, would be on the hook for civil damages), and much more accountability (because customers could take their business elsewhere).

Furthermore, such an institutional change could have wide appeal beyond only people who desire a small state. Those who are concerned about the police’s respect for civil liberties and their treatment of minorities and the poor, but who are not necessarily in favor of smaller government, should appreciate the empowerment that competition and choice bring to the consumer. Individuals and communities being able to fire the police and replace them would do far more to ensure high quality policing than protests, civilian oversight boards, or federal consent decrees ever will.

Ultimately, the government need not be in the business of the provision of policing any more than it need be in the provision of shoes. For those who believe a state is necessary to define “the rules of the game,” be a final decision-maker in legal disputes, and ensure individual rights are protected, a government monopoly on policing is not only unnecessary but may even be counterproductive

POLICE STATE

Olddogs Comments!

Americans who submit to todays wanna-be killers in law enforcement are living proof that they have no clue what America is supposed to be. In my youth, a cop that beat a woman would be thrown off the force so fast he would not know which way was home. And carrying around automatic weapons was considered ridiculous. They were honorable protectors of the people.

POLICE STATE

The White American Founding Stock on the precipice of being relegated to minority status by design. Then What?

March 31st, 2017 by

www.arkanasfreedom.com

 

By Joe McCutchen

Never in the history of our Republic has there been so much treasure spent maliciously, i.e. Bush’s 16 year indulgences in criminal, unconstitutional wars, likewise public education and nothing positive gained. 

T.R. 3/28/17: “School District seeks diversity”, i.e. more historical crime and government expansion being launched against middleclass white Americans further reducing us to a proletariat dimension.

I have debated myself for years which federal government agency is the most criminally corrupt that those reside under the federal government umbrella. Finally, my winner:  government schools. The T.R. article above tipped the scales for me.

Yes, the American military killing machine being engaged in eternal preemptive wars (since 1950;s Korea) now with an uninvited presence in 160 nations resulting in murder, destruction, torture, rape, sniping, U.S. government overthrows, all claiming mysterious phantom enemies and oh yes, are “keeping us safe”…while failing to secure our national borders. The military killing machine does have brief interludes for retrofitting their armaments  ($54 billion x 3 years) while the short circuiting of American white children minds is perpetual. The young foolishly courageous soldiers providing the man power (cannon fodder) for global insurrection believe they are “keeping us safe”. Most not understanding the U.S. is the global enemy (Dick Cheney’s call for war) set us on the path for global Armageddon. Most of these brave young troops are products & victims of the public schools’ systems—government—PC, social behavior, absent logic, history & philosophy.

Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources, Annette Henderson (assistants, deputies, associates, acting—a fiscal crime & how many of these are dwelling in the district?) proclaims 89% of the teachers are white (from her purview that is bad), 42% of students white–bad, 33.7% Hispanic–good. Interestingly and tragically Mexicans and OTM’s outnumber black Americans by 22.4%.  In other words, foreign nationals, mostly illegals, are one-third of the student population—a constitutional, immoral crime. Why is so much treasure, attention, energies spent on foreign born nationals while black & white American students, most particularly white are neglected academically? 

Why did Assistant Superintendent Henderson not disclose or perhaps she did not know and why did not Reporter Alex Golden ask some of the following questions?

  1. How many Mexicans & OTM’s in the district are illegal & how many, along with their parents are being fed, clothed, schooled & medicated in the Fort Smith system? Ms. Henderson acquaint yourself with 8USC, sections 1324a, 1324c, 1325.  Where do you come up with a constitutional fact that allows you to advocate that illegals and legals should be afforded extended rights while dumbing down, in the main, most white students? First of all the illegals should be deported and the legals expected to acculturate into our society and abandon their failed philosophies & cultures. You obviously do not understand this.
  2. How many foreign languages are spoken in the district? How is this linguistic tsunami dealt with?
  3. How many illegals on welfare and why are taxpayers forced to pay?
  4. How many unreported crimes in the district?

Never to my knowledge has the U.S. Dept. of Education, NEA, or the AEA complained about inheriting and teaching in a foreign national environment. One example, which emanated from Former Superintendent Benny Gooden who proclaimed at the zenith of the illegal Mexican & OTM invasions, with fervor (referring to illegals)…”we will take all we can get”.   Of course his aim was more money and expansion for the criminal government education protection racket. Observe the results!

THE CRIME: Where is it stated in the Constitution and Bill of Rights and in any legislation that in the main white middleclass citizens are obligated or have the moral responsibility to house, feed, educate, medicate these hordes of millions, legal & illegal, resulting in the pretzelizing the minds of black & white middleclass children by dumbing down the curriculum and implementing wholesale political correctness compliments of the Cultural Marxist Frankfurt School and their “march through the institutions”?

The depth of the educational criminal enterprise is indeed breathtaking! All connected with government become automatons of government, surrendering their independence for what they believe is a little security.

No school Board members, no teachers, no administrators, and certainly no politicians ever question the faux curriculum being foisted on the unknowing parents & children. Why? The above 4 groups are educational traitors and are deliberately trading down academically to accommodate the hordes who have and are invading our republic, e.g. Hispanics, mideasterners, sub-Saharan Africans, Indians, & Orientals, all resulting in a mongrelized population and societal destabilization as the end result—all in nation-killing practice of DIVERSITY.  Is that Ms. Henderson’s, et al goal?

The curriculum that is now being laid against American black & white students consists of out-right lies (154 yr. old Lincoln cover-up), omissions, revisions, indoctrination, PC emergence, all cultures are equal, DNA same, everyone equal, conditioning, propagandizing—all resulting in the short-circuiting our children’s minds—all by design. 

Sadly, many if not most, are purposely devoid of factual history & the ability to think logically & independently—The antithesis of public schools. Trading down academically will soon force our once preeminent republic to implode/explode. Sooner rather than later.  The U.S. academically ranks #29 for a reason.

Look no further than the incumbents who ‘we the people’ continually reelect cycle after cycle. In the minds of politicians, incumbency confers ownership resulting in crime & irreversible corruption.

The real mass immigration tsunami into America is on the horizon. This is our last call to breakfast.

Merit is out, trading down is in, a national fairly homogeneous white founding population is out and a vagabond, illiterate, diversified factions in.

Mass  immigration, legal & illegal, has made the U.S. formerly the most envied nation in the history of mankind and now in all likelihood, the most hated nation—turned into a land mass & and an uncivilized gypsy population that cannot be properly governed, particularly when that government is thoroughly criminally corrupted.

For Kevin 2 The Fifty States Claim and You

March 30th, 2017 by

Olddogs Comments!

ONLY AN IDIOT IS TOO LAZY TO READ THIS!

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/for-kevin-2-fifty-states-claim-and-you.html?showComment=1490875475131#c2798724339356748939

EXPATRIATIONBy Anna Von Reitz

I didn’t start out with all the information fully in hand.  All I had to begin with is that I learned —by dint of hard work— the IRS scam, and knew how to exercise my exemption from that.  Then I learned about the Zip Code Exemption…

Quite often I am in the peculiar position where people listen to me as long as it suits their egos, and then they go off on a different track and do their own thing—-get in trouble—and then, blame me. I hope that that is not your position.  Another phenomenon that astounds me is that people apparently believe that I just woke up one morning and knew everything on earth. 

Instead, it has been a very long and painful process with many, many rabbit holes, and I am only one of many fellow-travelers on the road.  You may not know their names, but you may be sure that thousands upon thousands of unsung heroes exist and that they have acted to save all our bacon over many decades.

I don’t know who came up with what in the present situation with the Continental Marshals, because I have obviously not been consulted and kept up to speed as I should have been. That is not, by the way, Marshal Haywood’s fault.

What I can tell you is that postage stamps are used to (1) pay certain kinds of taxes and (2) to insure things in international transit and (3) pay for postal service.  Patriots deprived of actual money have long used stamps and money orders to give value to their transactions and documents, because stamps and money orders are backed by gold and used internationally.  Once you understand that each state is a nation, and that everything crossing between state borders is either doing so in private trade or public commerce, you will see why stamps are useful for paying taxes and insuring actions as well as paying for postal service.  

I can’t tell you in what capacity stamps were or are being used without seeing the document that they were applied to, but a stamp is never wasted.  Putting a $1 stamp on a document that is then recorded insures it for $100,000.00 and guarantees that it reaches its destination or the full force of the Post Office will come down on those responsible. Read that— no more documents “disappearing” from court records and recording offices.  If you put a stamp on a document and then record it, the stamp is cancelled by the recording and the document is officially accepted.  Moreover, you have put actual cash value into that document, so that if you are establishing a contract, such as a self-executing contract, you have provided the consideration necessary to make it valid. 

As you can see, far from being “whack job” or “tin hat”— the judicious use of stamps is a wise and very useful means of making sure that your documents go where you intend them to go and also a means of literally adding value to your words and contracts.

As for being arrested— none of us are guaranteed that we won’t be wrongfully arrested.  Ignorance abounds in the police forces of this country.  Most of these men know zip about history or law.  They are just unemployed guys with families to feed.  They put on a uniform and think that that changes everything.  It doesn’t, but they believe it does, and so they swagger around and do stupid stuff out of gross ignorance.  They are often protected and kept ignorant by members of the Bar Associations who use them as “muscle” to continue carrying out illicit foreign revenue and asset capture activities on our soil.    Nobody is totally immune from ignorance.

That said, there are certainly many, many things that people can do to improve the situation. First and foremost, you begin by informing people.  Over time, as more people become educated, what was considered outlandish becomes accepted and known to be true and taken for granted.  It goes from “That can’t be so!”  to “Who doesn’t know that?” — but the process in between requires a lot of education. 

Ignorance on all sides is one of the Top Three enemies we face and there is a lot of it to be found.  Most policemen don’t know the difference between peacekeeping and law enforcement until someone takes the time to sit down and explain it to them.  They don’t know the difference between arrest and detainment.  They are rampaging around breaking the actual law on every hand and not having a clue that they are doing anything bad. 

We have to teach them, which means that we have to learn it all ourselves first.

So educating ourselves is the first necessary step.  Changing our political status is the next step.  Creating our jural assemblies and local militias is third, but ideally, changing political status is taken care of as part of the assembly process.  You can’t lawfully participate in an American county assembly without expatriating from the presumptions of United States citizenship.  Picture it this way— an American stumbles through the door and says, “I am an American! I want my birthright political status restored!  I am here to sign up!”  So the people organizing the local assembly take the poor soul in, give him the right paperwork to expatriate, record that, sign him up as a member of the county assembly, sign him up as a member or support member of the local militia, and the worst of it is over in one swoop.  

Expatriation from an presumption of “United States citizenship” is easy.  Overcoming the presumptive actions of the United States, Inc. against us, is not.  It is most instructive to read about what Gandhi went through against the Raj’s presumptions, because that same system is what we are facing here.  We can beg and plead and stomp our feet and scream, “But I am an American!  Look at my Act of Expatriation!” as long as we like, but they don’t listen, do they? 

This is because while we are doing this, we still have our hand in their cookie jar. 

We have to literally put our money where our mouth is by appointing the Secretary of the United States Treasury our Fiduciary and “surrendering” the US PERSON that we were gifted with almost at birth, and tell him to move that PERSON out of the “United States” bin and into the “United States of America” bin. 

This is as easy—-and as hard—- as obtaining an authenticated copy of the Birth Certificate of the PERSON named after you, filling out an IRS Form 56 naming Steven T. Mnuchin the Fiduciary of this PERSON, and endorsing the Birth Certificate so that he can move HIM or HER from the United States back to the United States of America. 

The specific endorsement to do this requires “accepting” the front of the BC document by writing “Accepted by Drawee” on the upper left corner of the BC and signing it with your normal Upper and Lower Case signature and dating it, then turning the BC over and writing, “Pay to the Order of the United States of America, U.S. Treasury. Without Recourse.” You sign this with a by-line, that is, instead of a naked signature, you write: by: Your Normal Name— and date it.

This really is instruction enough to Steven T. Mnuchin to get the basic job done, but you should also tell him to indemnify HIM or HER under the Private Registered Indemnity Bond AMRI00001 RA393427640US already on file. 

The indemnity bond is an insurance policy against whatever claims may be made against the US PERSON, so that we are no longer responsible for HIS/HER debts or actions.  It creates an effective estoppel, so that they can no longer deny the truth of your declared political status and can no longer use HIM/HER as a means to get to you.  They no longer have a handle on you, the living man, and they are instead responsible for managing HIM/HER for your benefit.  

Have you read our book, “You Know Something is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause?”  We deliberately made it a comic book and did it in large print, so that it would be easy to read, but people still have to read it to get the basic overall information they need. 

Obviously, we got dumped in the “US citizen” category almost at birth.  It was done by our unwitting Mothers who were deliberately confused as to which “United States” was being talked about and what it means to be a “citizen”.  

So our Mothers were duped by semantic deceit and we were too young to know anything untoward was happening— the set up for a near-perfect crime of identity theft and political mischaracterization was accomplished by clueless hospital staffers and temporary census workers.  To complete the beauty of this “nobody knows” system, we were taught to enslave ourselves from an early age and to answer “yes” to the question, “Are you a United States citizen?” 

Not knowing what that meant, and never being told, millions of us assumed that we were US citizens—- admitted as much, and innocently enslaved ourselves and stubbornly clung to our chains.

The only clue that this was going on, was the obvious fact that we were being enslaved and abused and taxed to death and generally denied all the things that our constitution guarantees us. 

I was no different than any of the rest of the Americans thus defrauded and left wondering WT….?  But I knew enough to know that something was wrong and I was desperate enough to keep looking for answers.  So it was and is a long, long continuing process to learn things, to test what we think we know, and to progress on out of this situation.

It isn’t like the perpetrators just handed us any answers on a silver platter.  We had to dig and delve and then test the efficacy of our solutions in the real world—-like a scientific experiment. 

Once I got to a certain point in this process, I realized that the last version of an organization representing our lawful government was bankrupted in 1933.  Pay close attention— I didn’t say “our lawful government”— I said, “organization representing” our lawful government.  I realized, too, that that bankruptcy ended in 1999.  So the only entity having any kind of “successor claim” back to the original government and the actual Constitution was a derelict business structure released from bankruptcy, but deliberately left vacated: the United States of America, Inc.

I realized that if claim was not made on the land jurisdiction states, there would be no property to recoup.   So I set about the process of reclaiming all fifty states of the union. 

This is no easy proposition.  Thankfully, some others among us had realized the same thing back in the 1990’s and launched the Nation States Project.  They got organized and went to the Hague and raised their state flags and gave Notice that the actual states were still alive.  Thankfully, too, Russell-Jay:Gould realized the importance of the United States of America Post Master’s office and launched the effort to reclaim our international seat of government in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

Some of the most critical work had already been done, but the banksters were hard on our heels and intent on using yet another fraudulent bankruptcy and claim on abandonment process to steal our entire country, lock, stock, and dairy herd.

Our entire country and all fifty actual states were due to be turned over to whatever bank creditors showed up and then sold off to pay the debts of the presumed secondary beneficiary to our ESTATES— the UNITED STATES, INC. and its STATE OF___________franchises — and all this was being done very quietly behind our backs, so that the actual heirs could never show up and claim back their property. 

We tunneled back through the dusty reams of paperwork now 150 years old and rooted out the truth.  We put out the word to Americans nationwide, asking men —-white men above the age of 21 (the requirement of the Law back then) who had forefathers who were landowners here before the Civil War to step forward, do an Act of Expatriation, and claim back their birth states.  

And they did.  Many hundreds of American men answered the call and many hours of research was donated by members of the Mormon Church to verify their lineage and claims.  Now we had heirs to the (e)states on the game board, actual living, breathing men with the provenance and political status standing to make the claim. 

So I gave the world Notice via UCC-1 Financing Statements.  And then I set up the Non-UCC Liens, attaching all the assets of the “State of____________” and “STATE OF_______________” franchises and rolling them back into the United States of America franchises doing business as the _____________State.   And from there, I rolled the entire shebang back to the “united States of America”—– the flagship organization owed The Constitution for the united States of America. 

All of this took months.  Months to prepare and months to execute and months to cure, but we got ‘er done.

And it is now standing there flat-footed on the international Public Record.  Our property has been claimed back, state by state, and all fifty of them are in the possession of the “united States of America”.  Not Barclay’s.  Not HSBC.  Not Wells Fargo.  Not Bank of American.  Not BIS.  Not IBRD.  Not World Bank.  Not the Federal Reserve.  Not the IMF.

The shoe, so to speak, is now on the other foot.  These banks have attempted to enslave us and to steal our birthright by fraud and deceit and they have been foiled. 

They made final attempts to brazen out their crimes and went to the UN and claimed that the States of America no longer exists, but we issued new Sovereign Letters Patent and made new arrangements for international representation.  HRM attempted to claim that she was the Head of State for the “United States”—- meaning us —- but we very neatly disproved that claim by producing the Great Seal of the United States, which is held internationally by the Belle Chers (Belchers) who are sovereigns above the Queen and Kings of England dating from the Norman Conquest. 

Though the snake has twisted and turned and writhed, we have it firmly by the head and it can wiggle all it likes without getting anywhere. 

That, and working out a solution to the worldwide phony “debt” crisis, is what we have been working on the last two years. 

We also indemnified everything and everyone and issued sovereign bonds.  Sovereign bonds are different than normal bonds.  They are in fact what underlies all the admiralty and maritime bonds.  We, the sovereign people, are the actual underwriters of all commerce taking place in the world.  That’s also something the banks tried to hide from us, but no, we nabbed them there, too. 

We not only indemnified the whole shooting match and subrogated it, we tendered the Payment Bond for all this to the Vatican Chancery Court, which is the bank for the Holy See, which owns and operates all these governmental services corporations like AUSTRALIA and CANADA and the US and GERMANY. 

They have tried to exclude women and black people and natives of all the indigenous tribes.  We made that impossible.

They have committed gross fraud and Dishonest Service against the people of the world by holding our assets “on deposit” in “off-ledger accounts” and pretended that we are paupers, when in fact, we are the richest people in the world.

And so the cows have come home and the chickens to roost and there is nothing that the perpetrators can say or do, except, “I’m sorry.” 

This may give you a clue that while you have all nestled safe in your beds, asleep and dead to the world, other Americans have been keeping watch and keeping the monsters at bay.  Very shortly now, there will no longer be any need for people to argue with their public servants about their own political status.  It will be simple.  If you aren’t on a government payroll—and I do mean payroll, not just receiving pension payments and the like—-you will be properly identified.  If you work for an actual state government, you will be identified as an American State Citizen.  If you don’t work for a state government, you will be identified as an American state national. 

No presumption of United States Citizenship or otherwise being a “citizen of the United States” shall pertain to you at all.  The accounts due to the United States of America, Inc. and ultimately to the united States of America, are already claimed, indemnified, due and paid for.  Now it is just a matter of working out the details and diffusing the phony “debt bomb” the criminals tried to create as cover for their embezzlement.

We have developed a means to do away with all debt worldwide—an answer that harms nobody and helps everyone concerned.  Even the banks.  Even the governmental services corporations. So, full steam ahead, all hands on deck.

And as for you, Kevin, I trust that your part is now clear.  You can choose to serve as a Continental Marshal or you can choose to serve in your county/state Militia or you can run for the lawful office of Sheriff on the Land for your county or you can just do your due diligence and make your claim and be a Free Man.  You have all these options, free to choose—but it all begins to have teeth when you “surrender” the US PERSON and put an ad in the paper and announce a public meeting of the Land Jurisdiction County Assembly.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

EXPATRIATION

Are You A Subject of Government Or A Sovereign?

March 29th, 2017 by

https://newswithviews.com/are-you-a-subject-of-government-or-a-sovereign/

SOVEREIGNTYBy Ron Ewart

NOTE:  This article has nothing immediately to do with our contemporary problems as a nation and as a people.  And then again, it may have EVERYTHING to do with our current problems as a people and as a nation because it deals with the principles of individual freedom and sovereignty and who HAS the real power, but only if they have the courage to exercise that power.  We write these kinds of articles from time to time to bring a much-needed focus to the issues

The U. S. Constitution and the Constitution of the several states do not start out with “We the Government“, or “We the Group“, or “We the Collective“, or “We the King.”  They all start out with “We The People” and for good reason.  The whole concept of “We the People” was and still is based on the fundamental law that each person is endowed with personal sovereignty over their lives and their property.  America’s total foundation was built upon sovereignty resting in the people, not the government.  Government was limited to seventeen (17) enumerated powers.  All other rights were reserved unto the states and the people.  Each individual person is equal to all other persons, as joint tenants in a government created by them, with the right to throw off that government or “….. to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

Individual freedom and individual sovereignty define America as a Republic, not a Democracy.  In a Republic the sovereignty resides in the individual.  In a Democracy, sovereignty resides in a group or the collective, where the individual is relegated to an inferior status.   This gave rise to the term “mob rule.”

For over 100 years, one political party in America has been doing everything within its power to convert America into a Democracy (“mob rule”) by buying off the people for their votes and dividing them into constituency groups that fight with each other for the spoils of government.  Sadly, that political party has been hugely successful.

But this political party and those that adhere to it are and have been egregiously wrong, if individual freedom is the sacrosanct pillar of liberty.  In a Republic, no other person, or operation of government, can take your property, your labor, your thoughts, or your life from you without your permission, for that is theft, or murder and it is a crime on your person and on humanity as well.  That crime, now accepted as “normal” by the people, is deserved of severe punishment, but punishment has yet to come.  By accepting that crime as “normal”, the people have abdicated their individual sovereignty to the group, the collective, the mob, to government.  The natural fact is, you are an individual, endowed with certain unalienable rights, a gift from your creator.  Not because someone wrote it down in a book, or a Declaration, or a Constitution, or shouted it from the rooftops.  It is true because it is the law of nature.  It is an absolute law with no contravening or superior law to supersede it.  It is the law of all laws and cannot be repealed by man or God.

Only you own your life, your property, your thoughts and your labor and all are sovereign to that which is you.  You are not a pawn that can be battered about at someone else’s will, or a whim, or for entertainment, or for the pure exercise of absolute power.  You are not a slave to the collective, or the elite and you owe nothing to humanity other than what you choose to give of your own volition, as a free spirit, endowed with free choice.  Your only responsibility is to take care of yourself and those in your charge and to treat others with the same respect and dignity, as you desire to be treated.  Your only duty to country is to defend it when it is under attack.

You did not create you.  In the beginning you had no control over the mechanisms that formed the shape of your body, the characteristics of your personality or your mind, or the capabilities that were granted to your body and mind by virtue of genetics and life with or without your parents.  But no matter what anyone tells you, you were not created to serve others, unless it is your choice to do so.  In fact, you were created to express who you are, as a flower expresses its beauty to the world.  You were created to serve your life and those you love, in the endless pursuit of happiness.

You are unique, one of a kind, a sovereign and no other can be like you.  It is your individual uniqueness that is your value.  It is what you express or achieve as a person, that is your mark, your legacy, your reason for being here.  No other person, group of persons, or a government, has the right to take that from you.  You are not a pawn, for you are sovereign under the supreme law of nature.  You are free to choose good or evil, but if you choose evil, there will be a price to pay.

A sovereign can be defined as an individual that believes in self-ownership; a strong commitment to individual rights; a distrust of a political democracy; an unwavering belief in the right to financial and personal privacy; a willingness to think and act outside the square.  It is individual sovereigns in action that have given America its unique and exceptional character, its power, its creativity, its productivity and even its generosity.  It is each individual sovereign pursuing his or her life, liberty and happiness that set each of us a part from all other humans on earth.  It is our strength.  It is our foundation.  It is the bedrock upon which we stand.  It is unequivocal, sacrosanct and unassailable.

Individual sovereignty is the exercise of free will.  It is similar to national sovereignty, where a country exercises the free will of a nation, without any influence from other nations.  National sovereignty is characterized by geographical boundaries and a set of principles under which sovereignty is exercised within those boundaries.  However, individual sovereignty is a state of mind and its boundaries are limited by the proximity of another individual, also exercising free will.  The Biblical “golden rule” is a version of the limits of free will.

The Founding Fathers recognized individual free will, or individual sovereignty as it were, as the right of every human being to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness.  However, even though the Founding Fathers codified individual sovereignty into the U. S. Constitution, as enumerated in the Declaration of Independence and the first 10 Amendments in the Constitution, if an individual does not have the courage to exercise his or her free will, he or she, will be an easy mark for control by a government, or a group, a mob, or a bully.  They will be vulnerable to propaganda, hype, distortion and lies in that they abdicate their right of free will to someone else, or a group, or a government ….. or a mob.  Because you see, freedom is courage in the exercise of free will, which entails the taking of risks.   Unfortunately, there are millions of Americans that exist in America today, who do not have the courage to exercise free will and they are the ones that continually elect politicians who will make decisions for them and give them handouts from the government.

Freedom is hard.  It demands sacrifice and a never-ending defense against those that would take it from you.  Although it encourages success, it also predicts failure.  But the experience of failure accelerates attaining success, because failure is learning.  If government takes away the right to fail, as the American government has been doing for some 100 years under a flawed Progressive ideology, individuals cease exercising their free will.  If individuals cease exercising their free will, governments, groups, or other individuals, or the mob, will fill the gap and take away individual sovereignty from everyone, as they have been and are doing.

It is the exercise of free will, or individual sovereignty that has poll vaulted a 240-year-old country, conceived in freedom and liberty, into the wealthiest, the most productive, the most creative, the most industrious and the most generous nation on Earth.

But if a bully, or a mob, or a tyrannical government descends upon a sovereign, it is up to that sovereign to defend against the bully and to rally other sovereigns in his defense, as we must do today.  For the bully is knocking on our door and he has evil intent on his mind.  He intends to claim our property, our thoughts, our labor and our life as his own and take away our individual sovereignty over our own lives, in favor of the group, the collective, the mob.  He intends to control our money, our land, our water, our food, our health and our energy.  He is well on his way to achieving his goal.  In the end, he intends to take away our free choice and thus, our liberty.   He is the enemy of freedom, but he will succeed, only if we let him.

If you believe in all your heart that your property, your thoughts, your labor and your life are only yours to give and that your life is sovereign, then you have no choice but to defend it against the bully and if necessary, defend it with your life.  For if you choose not to defend it by whatever means, you will lose it and your children will lose it and your children’s children will lose it.  It will then be left to another braver generation to reclaim freedom and reclaim it they will, but at a great cost.  When freedom is finally reclaimed once more, the future victors will look back at our generation and label them cowards.

It is now time to decide ….. are you a government subject, or are you a sovereign?  Are you a coward, or are you courageous?  Are you timid, or are you fearless?  Liberty awaits your answer and liberty grows anxious because liberty’s life and future is on the line ….. and it always is.

But then these are just words.  Without action, the words are meaningless.

You are encouraged to ADD your thoughts.

Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property rights issues and author of this weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America”. Ron is the president of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO) (www.narlo.org), a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, acting as an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. Affiliated NARLO websites are “SAVE THE USA” and “Getting Even With Government”. Email: info@narlo.org Website: http://www.narlo.com

SOVEREIGNTY

Do Your Ears Hang Low?

March 28th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/do-your-ears-hang-low.html

By Anna Von Reitz

How many of you remember the children’s song, “Do Your Ears Hang Low?”  — Remember this line— “Do your ears hang low?  Do they wobble to and fro?  Can you throw them over your shoulder like a Continental Soldier?…..”

This song dates from Revolutionary War times.  Although it sounds silly and children still delight in it, the “ears” the rowdy Colonists were talking about weren’t attached to their heads, and the song was regularly sung by those same Continental Soldiers on the march— similar to the Marines singing “Sound Off!” as they march.

As the song makes very clear, there were soldiers called “Continental Soldiers” — and it is also clear that they were the American soldiers fighting in the Revolutionary War.  What other “Continental Soldiers” have you ever heard of?

They were called “Continental Soldiers” and sometimes just “Continentals” because they were landsmen not sailors, and they were protecting their land from British invasion.

Continental Soldier equals “Land Soldier” and Continental United States equals “Land United States”.  It was the militias of the land that defeated the British sea-borne attackers.

Please note these same soldiers were called “Colonial Soldiers” or just “Colonials”.  This in turn references the fact that the Revolutionary War was supported by the 13 Colonies.

What do you know— or should you know— about the 13 Colonies?

First, they were all very different, not just in location, but in derivation.  Some of the colonies were established by England— New England and Virginia, for example— and were funded in the early days by British investment companies: New England Company, Virginia Company, etc.

Others were founded by other European Monarchies and their investment companies— New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, for example, were not founded or financed by England.

Catholic Delaware and Maryland stood cheek and jowl with Protestant Virginia Colony.

This should give everyone a clue that when the American Colonies stood up together and acted as one accord as Americans, it was not as the popular historians would have you believe a matter of a united America standing against the British.  It was a matter of colonies of various European nations breaking away from the domination of Europe, and in the case of Maryland and Delaware– breaking away from the control of the Pope.

Nothing like it had ever been seen in the history of the world.  No colony had ever broken free of the grip of the sponsoring nation.  And here you had thirteen of them, all going for broke, and repudiating the claims of the assorted European Monarchies and the Pope, together, at once.

As such, the American Revolution was a revolution of thought, a new idea, and that idea was that men have the right of freewill and self-determination given them by their Creator, and no man— no Monarch, no Pope — has the right to dictate another’s conscience, lay claim to his body or his land or his assets, or otherwise inflict taxes and “injuries” or require payments for services rendered without his consent.

It wasn’t just the King of England being given a send up.  It was the King of France, the King of the Netherlands, the King of Denmark, the King of Spain—–all the European Monarchs and the Pope—-being given their walking papers.

So now you have some key information that has been missing, perhaps, from your education on these subjects.  I had Michael R. Hamilton send me an email and accuse me of just making up the name “Continental United States” and “Continental Marshals”.

Well, if I made it up, then I would own the copyright to it, correct?  And there would be no need for the flap over who “owns” or doesn’t own the Continental Marshals service.

But, regrettably, I didn’t think of it.  The Founders did.

The need for the Continental Marshals arose soon after the adoption of the actual Constitution, and it arose as a result of splitting the international jurisdiction owed to the united Colonies acting as the united “States of America” into delegated and undelegated powers.

In 1790, George Washington organized the first United States Districts and the first US Marshals service as a part of the fall-out of the federal Judiciary Act.  They were assigned to protect the newly mandated federal maritime and admiralty courts.  They served in the delegated international jurisdiction created by The Constitution.

In the same year, Benjamin Franklin organized the Continental Marshals to operate within the already established Postal Districts, to protect the Post Offices and Post Roads. Over time, the Continental (Land) Marshals became known as Federal Marshals.  They served the states and the people to maintain and enforce the Public Law governing the undelegated portion of international jurisdiction that was retained by the states and the people.  (Amendment X of the Bill of Rights).

Easily within my lifetime and most of yours, you have heard of both “Federal Marshals” and “US Marshals” but probably never knew the difference.

Confusion reigns because from the foundations of this country there have always been two (or more) entities calling themselves the “United States”.

To shed more light on this circumstance, I am here reprinting all of one of the immortal Howard Freeman’s articles.

Please note that since Howard wrote this some time back in the 1990’s or 2000’s, the Uniform Commercial Code has been renumbered and the actual Code Section that allows you to retain your constitutional guarantees is no longer UCC 1-207, but is now instead UCC 1-308.

Also note the confusion that arises at the end of the article when even Howard Freeman used “Federal” as a catch-all term instead of distinguishing between “US” (delegated) and “Federal” (non-delegated) powers.

It was to avoid this confusion that I suggested resurrecting the original name “Continental Marshals” and using that instead of “Federal Marshals” so that people would more readily grasp the fact that the Continental Marshals work for the land jurisdiction states and the people and be able to set them apart from “United States Marshals” who work for the incorporated UNITED STATES, INC.

Thanks to both ignorance and guile in some quarters, the re-use of the name “Continental Marshals” was used to spawn a new and different confusion— at least in the minds of some less informed people— who have attempted to call state militiamen “continental marshals”.

It boils down to this, folks— the states of the union have the iron-clad guarantee that they can keep their “well-regulated militias” and they need to make use of that guarantee by retaining that name for their state-based armed forces.  There is a fundamental guarantee lost by calling militiamen “marshals”.

When we knowingly operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea, we have historical precedent going back to Ben Franklin for using officers called “Continental Marshals” and later “Federal Marshals” to enforce the undelegated international jurisdiction owed to the states and people.

If we want to retain our freedom and restore our lawful government instead of going off the tracks and engaging in an insurrectionist folly, it only makes sense to cut the confusion to the bone and call offices and officers by their historically correct names.

As you read this article, “The Two United States and the Law” also bear in mind that since Freeman wrote this—and although what he says remains fundamentally true—another sleight of hand has taken place and the original “United States” he correctly refers to as the “continental United States” has dropped completely off the board (unless we resurrect it) and the “Two United States” currently being employed by the rats in Congress are the Territorial United States (what Freeman calls the “Federal United States”) and the Municipal United States, so that we are denied access to any of the constitutional guarantees as long as we submit to being counted either “United States Citizens” or “citizens of the United States”:

 

The Two United States and the Law
by Howard Freeman

Our forefathers, weary of the oppressive measures that King George III’s government forced upon them, in common declared their independence from England in 1776. They were not expected to be successful in that resistance. The moneyed people had backed England for two major reasons. First, our forefathers wanted a rigid, written Constitution “set in concrete.” They were familiar with the so-called Constitution of England which consisted largely of customs, precedents, traditions, and understandings, often vague and always flexible. They wanted the principle of English common law, that an act done by any official person or law-making body beyond his or its legal competence was simply void. Second, the thirteen little colonies desired to base their union on substance (gold and silver) — real money. They well knew how the despotic governments of Europe were mortgaged to the hilt — lock, stock, and barrel, the land, the people, everything — to certain wealthy men who controlled the banks, the currency, and all credit, who lent credit but did not loan gold and silver!
The United States of America was made up of a union of what is now fifty sovereign States, a three-branch (legislative, executive, and judicial) Republic known as The United States of America, or as termed in this article, the Continental United States. Its citizenry live in one of the fifty States, and its laws are based on the Constitution, which is based on Common Law.
Less than one hundred years after we became a nation, a loophole was discovered in the Constitution by cunning lawyers in league with the international bankers. They realized that a separate nation existed, by the same name, that Congress had created in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. This “United States” is a Legislative Democracy within the Constitutional Republic, and is known as the Federal United States. It has exclusive, unlimited rule over its citizenry, the residents of the District of Columbia, the territories and enclaves (Guam, Midway Islands, Wake Island, Puerto Rico, etc.), and anyone who is a citizen by way of the 14th Amendment (naturalized citizens).
Both United States have the same Congress that rules in both nations. One “United States,” the Republic of fifty States, has the “stars and stripes” as its flag, but without any fringe on it. The Federal United States’ flag is the stars and stripes with a yellow fringe, seen in all the courts. The abbreviations of the States of the Continental United States are, with or without the zip codes, Ala., Alas., Ariz., Ark., Cal., etc. The abbreviations of the States under the jurisdiction of the Federal United States, the Legislative Democracy, are AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, etc. (without any periods).
Under the Constitution, based on Common Law, the Republic of the Continental United States provides for legal cases (1) at Law, (2) in Equity, and (3) in Admiralty:
(1) Law is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense. It is the will of the majority, the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces, to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all. Since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force — for the same reason — cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups. Law allows you to do anything you want to, as long as you don’t infringe upon the life, liberty or property of anyone else. Law does not compel performance. Today’s so-called laws (ordinances, statutes, acts, regulations, orders, precepts, etc.) are often erroneously perceived as law, but just because something is called a “law” does not necessarily make it a law. [There is a difference between “legal” and “lawful.” Anything the government does is legal, but it may not be lawful.]
(2) Equity is the jurisdiction of compelled performance (for any contract you are a party to) and is based on what is fair in a particular situation. The term “equity” denotes the spirit and habit of fairness, justness, and right dealing which would regulate the intercourse of men with men. You have no rights other than what is specified in your contract. Equity has no criminal aspects to it.
(3) Admiralty is compelled performance plus a criminal penalty, a civil contract with a criminal penalty.
By 1938 the gradual merger procedurally between law and equity actions (i.e., the same court has jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The nation was bankrupt and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers) who now owned everything — the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the States and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people. Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.
The remainder of this article explains how this happened, where we are today, and what remedy we have to protect ourselves from this system.

Our Present Commercial System of “Law”
and the REMEDY Provided for Our Protection

The present commercial system of “law” has replaced the old and familiar Common Law upon which our nation was founded. The following is the legal thread which brought us from sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) to discharge our debts with limited liability instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin.

The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Erie Railroad v. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law — or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed public policy.
Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument’s Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the United States (which “United States” has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, as distinguished from the “United States,” which is the Union of the fifty States).
In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted the “benefits” offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper.
This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called “benefit” offered, or available, to them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.
This is exactly how the corporate entities of state, county, and municipal governments got entangled with the Legislative Democracy, created by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, and called here The Federal United States, to distinguish it from the Continental United States, whose origin was in the Union of the Sovereign States.
The same national Congress rules the Continental United States pursuant to Constitutional limits upon its authority, while it enjoys exclusive rule, with no Constitutional limitations, as it legislates for the Federal United States.
With the above information, we may ask: “How did we, the free Preamble citizenry of the Sovereign States, lose our guaranteed unalienable rights and be forced into acceptance of the equitable debt obligations of the Federal United States, and also become subject to that entity of government, and divorced from our Sovereign States in the Republic, which we call here the Continental United States?” We do not reside, work, or have income from any territory subject to the direct jurisdiction of the Federal United States. These are questions that have troubled sincere, patriotic Americans for many years. Our lack of knowledge concerning the cunning of the legal profession is the cause of that divorce, but a knowledge of the truth concerning the legal thread, which caught us in its net, will restore our former status as a free Preamble citizen of theRepublic. The answer follows:
Our national Congress works for two nations foreign to each other, and by legal cunning both are called The United States. One is the Union of Sovereign States, under the Constitution, termed in this article the Continental United States. The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, here termed the Federal United States. Very few people, when they see some “law” passed by Congress, ask themselves, “Which nation was Congress working for when it passed this or that so-called law?” Or, few ask,
“Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the Federal United States?”
Since these questions are seldom asked by the uninformed citizenry of the Republic, it was an open invitation for “cunning” political leadership to seek more power and authority over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of “legalese.” Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic, in harmony with its Constitutional mandate. Instead, it created an abundance of commercial credit money for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by Constitutional limitations. Then, after having created an emergency situation, and a tremendous depression in the Republic, Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the negotiable instrument paper of the Legislative Democracy (Federal United States) a legal tender for Continental United States citizenry to use in the discharge of debts.
At the same time, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the “benefit” of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that the gold and silver coins of the Republic were out of date and cumbersome. The citizens were told that gold and silver (substance) was no longer needed to pay their debts, that they were now “privileged” to discharge debt with this more “convenient” currency, issued by the Federal United States. Consequently, everyone was forced to “go modern,” and to turn in their gold as a patriotic gesture. The entire news media complex went along with the scam and declared it to be a forward step for our democracy, no longer referring to America as a Republic.
From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light for Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal Democracy, which overcame the depression, which was caused by a created shortage of real money. There was created an abundance of debt paper money, so-called, in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instrument paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of paperwork credit instruments.
Since all contracts since Roosevelt’s time have the colorable consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of a genuine consideration of silver and gold coin, all contracts are colorable contracts, and not genuine contracts. [According to Black’s Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means “That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth.”]
Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent, rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of contracts under the Common Law.
All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-called “statutes” of legislative bodies being enforced in these Legislative Tribunals are not “statutes” passed by the legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as “commercial obligations” to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States and who has accepted the “benefit,” or “privilege,” of discharging his debts with the limited liability “benefit” offered to him by the Federal United States … EXCEPT those who availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207.
When used in conjunction with one’s signature, a stamp stating “Without Prejudice U.C.C. 1-308” is sufficient to indicate to the magistrate of any of our present Legislative Tribunals (called “courts”) that the signer of the document has reserved his Common Law right. He is not to be bound to the statute, or commercial obligation, of any commercial agreement that he did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, as would be the case in any Common Law contract.
Furthermore, pursuant to U.C.C. 1-103, the statute, being enforced as a commercial obligation of a commercial agreement, must now be construed in harmony with the old Common Law of America, where the tribunal/court must rule that the statute does not apply to the individual who is wise enough and informed enough to exercise the remedy provided in this new system of law. He retains his former status in the Republic and fully enjoys his unalienable rights, guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the Republic, while those about him “curse the darkness” of Commercial Law government, lacking the truth needed to free themselves from a slave status under the Federal United States, even while inhabiting territory foreign to its territorial venue.

PS— if you want to send this to you mailing lists, best convert all the hyperlinks in the Freeman article to plain text.  Some servers are rejecting articles with embedded hyperlinks.

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Lawful Government

Not Overtaken-Reborn

March 27th, 2017 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/03/not-overtaken-reborn.html

AMERICA REBORNBy Anna Von Reitz

I haven’t had an opportunity to review this lengthy psyops report in depth, but it appears to be based on the assumption that because the names have changed and some international forces and new weapons are present, the America we love and know is being lost and overtaken.  In fact, what is being stripped away are the false names and presumptions that were the result of the Great Fraud and illegal occupation beginning in 1861. 

The actual country that we living American people are owed is being returned and the States of America are receiving back all the assets and credit that has been embezzled. Remember that the original constitution is called “The Constitution for the united States of America”—– the name of this country as it pertains to the delegated authority in international jurisdiction was always “States of America”.  The “united” was an adjective used to describe “States of America”.

This whole situation has become overly complex over time and the lawyers have had a field day confusing everyone and making false claims and practicing personage and barratry.  They’ve had a really sweet racketeering operation on our shores and they’ve done it in such a clever way that at the end of the day, they can even attempt to blame it on us and say that they did it all in our best interests. 

I am blowing past all that, as if it doesn’t exist, and going to the meat of the matter.  We want our land, we want our homes, we want our money, we want our identities, our copyrights, our trademarks, our patents— all of it returned.  We want clean, clear, easy means to correct our political status, obtain proper passports, and convert all these “public trusts” back into private bank accounts.  We want remedy on the land, full cure and maintenance on the sea, and redemption in the jurisdiction of the air. 

To do that requires going back to the actual names of things as they were 150 years ago and doing justice to the dead.  Think of all the people who lived and died as slaves since 1861, thinking that they were free men?  Deluded, fooled, defrauded, embezzled, conned by these criminals? 

It’s not just a matter of what is due to us, it’s what was due to our great-great-grandparents, too. 

There was a plan to kill the Priority Creditors of the con artists, just as they did in Nazi Germany.  We blew that to smithereens in 2014.  There was a plan to declare our Republics “dead”, no longer having “international representation” and no longer having a sufficient currency in international circulation.  We blew that sky-high in 2015. At every turn, as the con artists have tried to undermine us, tried to deny our claims, tried to gain the legal edge—- they have been defeated. 

And not just defeated.  Squashed flat.  Exposed.  Like roaches.

There was an attempt by HRM Elizabeth II to claim that she was the Head of State of the United States of America.  Wrong.  The actual Head of State stepped forward.  There was an attempt by FRANCE, that is, Jacob Rothschild, to establish a contract by assumption and succession.  We said, thanks, but no thanks.  In public.  Repeatedly. 

What needs to happen in America and in every other country around the world is a full and honest housecleaning and education of the public so as to enable every man and woman to make decisions—- a sort of planetary Town Hall meeting — where each one except those who really, truly are disabled and unable to act in their own behalf — gets to exercise their free will and have access to their own credit without middlemen. 

Anyone who is not in a coma, anyone who is say, sixteen or older, anyone who is mentally competent — should be truthfully told about the issues and choices, and then allowed to choose for themselves.

Those who are with me believe that when a man or woman is given all the facts, all the pros and cons, the vast majority will choose what is right and good for themselves and for their country and for all mankind.   Take away the lies and fears and tell the truth and at the end of the day—- we are grown up enough and rational enough to choose what is good.

I have often told the story of being lost in a blizzard in the back country of Alaska and seeing a tiny little Quonset hut in the distance, struggling my way to the door, and being welcomed by a very elderly Eskimo living very simple life on the very edge of nowhere.  When it comes push to shove, when we become aware of how small we are, when we start discerning the real miracles of life— then all of a sudden the world drops away and what is real and precious becomes painfully apparent.

Nobody has to tell us what is true or what is good.  We all already know.  

It’s right there in front of us.  It’s been there all the time.  And when we remember who and what we are, it’s so easy to be grateful and to choose life and to share, because we finally realize that we are worthy and we are loved and we are blessed and we are immersed in riches beyond compare in great abundance, with more than enough for our needs and wants and wishes, more than enough for every man to have his home in peace. 

The dark night of the Doctrine of Scarcity and the rule of Satan is finally ending.  The Thousand Years of Peace has been declared, and those who are guilty are scattering and stumbling, afraid of what this means and what will be done to them.  It is the Will of our Father, that not one will be lost.  Not a single goat, not a single sheep.  All will be redeemed.  All will be cared for.  All will be taught.  All will be cherished.  And though their sins are as scarlet, they shall be washed white as wool.

Those who are ruining the Earth will be stopped and a new Paradise will be born and it is happening right now. 

The plans of the Enemy are all torn and run amok.  The power of money is nothing compared to the power of Nature and love.  Rejoice. Have faith. You may feel angry about what has been revealed.  You may be afraid.  Other people may be rushing around in a panic.  Some may try to delude you again.  There’s ten pounds of ignorance for every pound of knowledge on the street right now.  But what I am telling you is true, and what all the naysayers and fear-mongers are telling you, is not.

And as we should all know by now, when what is true comes, what is false must pass away. 

See this article and over 500 others on Anna’s website here:

www.annavonreitz.com

Olddogs Comments!

I hesitated to publish this article because time has proven that, “absent the threat most people go back to sleep”. And, there remains a massive amount of restructuring to accomplish.

AMERICA REBORN

 


SEO Powered By SEOPressor