Log in



Categories » ‘Executive Orders’

TRUMP AND THE MILITIA

May 17th, 2016 by

OLDDOGS COMMENTS: Please forgive my tardy posting as I am recovering from my Dear Wife’s “HONEY DO” project yesterday. It involved working on my knees all day to re-caulk the fish pond waterfall I built in 2004 while recovering from Rotator cuff and bone spurs surgery.100_0767

TRUMP AND THE MILITIA

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin285.htm

By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
May 17, 2016

NewsWithViews.com

Please understand that I am not a “tub-thumper”, an enthusiast, or an apologist for Donald Trump. But his electrifying emergence on the scene represents a sea-change in American politics far more consequential than his own pyrotechnic personality, bold campaign-style, and receipt of popular acclaim suggest. He is, as it were, the surfer who—perhaps by accident, perhaps by insight, but in any event in a timely fashion—has caught the first of the really big waves rolling towards shore. The significant aspect of the present situation is not the surfer, however, but the wave: namely, the upsurge of popular disgust for the “two”-party political vessel in which this country is sailing on a collision-course into the rocks of despair. This first big wave threatens all of the ships riding at anchor in the Establishment’s harbor. So the Establishment needs to throw up a breakwater, in a manner both fast and furious.

As anyone with 20-20 political vision can see, America’s domestic enemies have taken off their velvet gloves to reveal the iron fists underneath, by employing against Trump directly, and America ultimately, the modern Bolshevistic strategy of socio-political destabilization through so-called “non-violent direct action”, “weathermen” tactics, and “color revolutions”—all in line with the old Leninist/Stalinist slogan, “there are no fortresses which Bolsheviks cannot storm”. Please refrain from chiding me that the contemporary Establishment is not, to one degree or another, made up largely of Bolsheviks. The opposite is obviously true. Some are retreaded Trotskyites (who call themselves “neoconservatives”). Others are watered-down Mensheviks (who call themselves “social democrats” or “moderate socialists”).

Others are the equivalent of NEP-men (better known here as “corporate socialists”, because they rely on governmental intervention in the economy to guarantee profits for themselves, while offloading losses onto the backs of the general public). And all of them are doctrinaire Leninists, inasmuch as they subscribe to his notion that “[t]he scientific term ‘dictatorship’ means nothing more nor less than authority untrammeled by any laws, absolutely unrestricted by any rules whatever, and based directly on force”. Vladimir I. Lenin, “A Contribution to the History of the Question of the Dictatorship, A Note” [1920], in Collected Works (Moscow, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Progress Publishers, 4th English Edition, 1966), Volume 31, at 353. None of these people gives a tinker’s dam for the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution—indeed, they believe themselves to be “untrammeled by any laws”. And all of them enthusiastically promote the present-day global “war on terrorism”, under color of which a para-militarized police-state apparatus, “absolutely unrestricted by any rules whatever, and based directly on force”, is being built up within this country in order to wage a domestic “war of terrorism” against the American people. See my book By Tyranny Out of Necessity: The Bastardy of “Martial Law” for the particulars on this.

If I may base my appreciation of the present situation upon an historical parallel drawn from Germany’s dolorous experience under the Weimar government in the 1920s and 1930s (which is probably familiar to most readers of this commentary), the advent of these bare-knuckled mass assaults on this country amounts to our own home-grown Bolsheviks’ declaration of ein Kampf um die Macht auf Leben und Tod (a struggle for power to the death). They will employ their Rotfrontkämpferbund (Red Front fighters’ league) to try to derail Trump’s nomination, through die Herrschaft des Pöbels auf der Straße (mobocracy in the street). If he is nominated, they will use der Bund to try to deny him election. If he is elected notwithstanding all of their efforts before November, they will then turn der Bund loose to stifle any major reforms which he attempts to put through after his inauguration, whether with or especially without Congress, the Judiciary, and the bureaucracy behind him. And please spare me the innuendo that, by drawing upon this parallel, I am somehow suggesting that Trump is a modern American “Hitler” figure. Rather, my intuition tells me that Trump is the sort of individual, perhaps rough-hewn but basically honest, who might have saved Germany from Hitlerism, as well as from Bolshevism, had the good Germans who came forward in der Wiederstand (the resistance-movement) after 1933 been more prescient and better organized before then.

One may ask why America’s Bolsheviks have decided to come out of the closet to exhibit their true coloration by unleashing mobocracy in the street, when they can (and surely will) employ every kind of old-fashioned fraud familiar in American politics to steal the election. The answer is that they anticipate their inability to put into practice Stalin’s apperçu that who votes is less important than who counts the votes, and are prudently preparing for the worst possible eventuality—namely, that in these unsettled times even widespread electoral fraud may not deprive Trump of victory if the polling-places are inundated by a true “revolt of the masses”. Moreover, even the most effective techniques of electoral fraud will be useless after the election. No further elections of consequence will be held during the first two years in which Trump holds “the Office of President”. If he cannot be stifled during that period, perhaps “the Trump phenomenon” will prove its worth in successful Presidential actions, and then will demonstrate its longevity and strength in the next elections—with the Bolsheviks suffering defeat after defeat. Between elections, the Bolsheviks will not be able to rely exclusively upon their co-conspirators, fellow travelers, dupes, useful idiots, and assorted fools in Congress, the Judiciary, and the bureaucracy to stand up to Trump. For the righteous anger of legions of patriotic Americans lined up behind him will give all of them pause. To put iron in their cronies’ backbones, the Bolsheviks will need to provide them with muscle in the streets: namely, hordes of well-funded, well-drilled “protesters” and “dissenters” deployed to shout down, or violently shut down, every popular manifestation of support for Trump.

So, as President, Trump—and all of the patriotic Americans in his camp—will desperately need the Militia:

(i) to awaken, energize, authorize, mobilize, organize, equip, train, and deploy on his behalf those whom the Declaration of Independence styles “the good People”;
(ii) to protect Trump himself—because no part of the present governmental apparatus at any level of the federal system can be trusted to do so;
(iii) to put through fundamental reforms that can be accomplished by the President alone (“to execute the Laws of the Union”, including both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, perforce of Article I, § 8, cl. 15 and such statutes as 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f); 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333; and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242), in particular against entrenched, recalcitrant, hostile, and disloyal bureaucrats and subversive private factions and other NGOs and special-interest groups; and especially
(iv) to leave puissant governmental institutions for “the good People” to use on their own at the State and Local levels in the event of an unavoidable and utterly destabilizing national crisis, probably centered in banking and haute finance, which breaks out during his Presidency.

With respect to points (ii) and (iii) in particular, one might recall the wisdom of General William Tecumseh Sherman who, when importuned to make himself a candidate for the White House, replied that “I would account myself a fool, a madman, an ass, to embark anew, at sixty-five years of age, in a career that may, at any moment, become tempest-tossed by the perfidy, the defalcation, the dishonesty or neglect of any of a hundred thousand subordinates utterly unknown to the President of the United States.” Quoted in Burke Davis, Sherman’s March (New York, New York: Vantage Books, 1988), at 298. So, if Trump intends to embark upon such a dangerous “career”, he must confront the risk of disloyal “subordinates utterly unknown to the President”, in terms of their identities, their subversive agenda, and their actual misdeeds. This problem can be solved only through mobilization of the Militia—for example, through the “execution of [certain of] the Laws of the Union” (say, 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333 coupled with 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1505, 1512, 1513, 1515, and 2071) for the purpose of airing all of the dirty linen which the bureaucracy has been hiding, from the extent of the CIA’s infiltration of and covert influence over other civilian governmental agencies, the Armed Forces, and private concerns, to the truth concerning the assassinations of JFK, the Waco massacre, the events surrounding 9/11, the origin and promotion of ISIS (and allied “radical Moslem” organizations), and so on and on and on.

Inasmuch as der Rotfrontkämpferbund is now being brazenly deployed, a counterrevolutionary “white” force must be mobilized to oppose and defeat it. If loyal Americans want to avoid witnessing the rise of some extreme “right-wing” (actually, “right-socialistic”) “brown” force such as die Sturmabteilung (by default the main counterweight to the Communist street-gangs in Weimar Germany during her time of troubles)—which many desperate Americans will demand, and not a few will surely join, if they are offered no other powerful alternative—something else must be provided for them. This force must be raised from among “the good People”, there being no other source with the necessary loyalty, legal authority, self-interest, and sheer numbers requisite for the task at hand. Especially, it must be a force with explicit and unequivocal authority under the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, an establishment within the government, not a force the provenance of which can be traced only to some private political party, movement, or group.

Therefore, if Trump actually intends to be a constitutional “Commander in Chief” in the fullest sense in both law and fact—and, Heaven knows, if he does not intend as much then he should emulate General Sherman by not seeking “the Office of President” at all—he needs to promote the exercise of that high authority against America’s domestic enemies, through exhortation for and mobilization of what the Constitution itself declares to be uniquely “necessary to the security of a free State”, and to which it explicitly assigns the authority and responsibility “to execute the Laws of the Union”—and he must do this, in both words and deeds, immediately if not sooner. This is no time to play for time; for, as the old saying has it, time brings all things, bad as well as good. During his campaign, he must advocate revitalization of the Militia; and, after his election, he must take every action necessary and proper to that end. I suspect that, if he does grasp that nettle, he will be able to say of the contemporary Establishment what General Sherman said of the old Confederacy: “pierce the shell, and it’s all hollow inside”.

On the other hand, if—Heaven forfend!—Hillary Clinton should seize “the Office of President”, either by her own devices or (more likely) with the aid of anti-Trump back-stabbers in the Republican Party or some third-party “spoiler” candidate (from such as the Libertarian Party, which disastrously split the conservative vote in favor of a dyed-in-the-wool Clintonite in the last gubernatorial election in Virginia), she and the Bolsheviks behind her will not sit on their hands. Instead, emboldened by their triumph in scotching Trump, they will turn out der Rotfrontkämpferbund to advance their revolutionary agenda by deploying das Faustrecht (mob rule by the fist) against all of the “constitutionalist”, “patriotic”, “conservative”, “traditionalist”, and other politically, economically, and culturally “right-wing” groups in the country: First, to intimidate them and anyone who even tangentially supports them. Second, to turn the undecided citizenry against them when they try to defend themselves (denouncing even their verbal self-defense as “incitement to violence”). And third, to unleash para-militarized police-state oppression, some species of “martial law” jury-rigged under color of “emergency powers”, Vyshinsky-type prosecutors, and the kangaroo courts to suppress whichever Americans try to stand up for their natural and constitutional rights. This, the Bolsheviks will expect, will bring about die Endlösung (the final solution) of the problems of popular sovereignty and popular self-government which so vex all totalitarians.

The even more ominous problem is that, one way or another, during a Hillary Clinton Presidency America will surely be subjected to Bolshevism running amok. In the event, say, of a sudden catastrophic collapse of the monetary and banking systems—leading to hyperinflation, a depression, or (most likely) the one followed by the other—Hillary will not allow herself to become a latter-day Herbert Hoover. Instead, she will strike out wildly at everyone whom she will perceive as an “enemy”. Her incompetence being exceeded only by her arrogance, ambition, avarice, and appetite for the exercise of abusive authority, she will immediately invoke “emergency powers”, and especially some version of “martial law”. The entire world is already aware of her homicidal extremism, in the epitaph for Gaddafi which she cackled after the Libyan affair: “We came, we saw, he died!” Undoubtedly, she will display that same barbaric attitude here—unless WE THE PEOPLE will be ready, willing, and able to invoke Nancy Reagan’s dictum: “Just say no!” The effectiveness of most laws requires that most of the citizenry are willing to obey them without demur. If the run of common Americans will come to realize that “emergency powers” are bunkum, that “martial law” is bunkum to the second power, and that no one but THE PEOPLE themselves can maintain “the security of a free State”, in the manner which the Constitution mandates, Hillary will find herself a tin-pot dictatrix without the ability to dictate, because she will be without subjects willing to acquiesce in her dictation. When that time comes, however, THE PEOPLE will have to know what their rights, duties and powers are—and what her powers (the powers of any President, for that matter) are not. Between now and then, they will have a lot to learn, and not much time in which to learn it.

Be forewarned. One need not be a dabbler in the occult to foretell the future in this respect. Neither need one be much of a student of modern history to fear the accuracy in these times of the old adages that “no one learns anything from history other than that no one ever learns anything from history”, and that “we grow too soon old and too late smart”. (Personally, too, I appreciate the wisdom of the observation that “no man is ever taken for a prophet in his own country”. For I have long been struggling to educate Americans about the Militia—and, most recently, about the utter illegality of “martial law”—with about as much success as if I had been trying to sell a twelve-step program in humility and reticence to the Kardashians.)

Nonetheless, I believe that Mao Tse-tung was correct (albeit perhaps only accidentally or hypocritically so) when he wrote that “[t]he people, and the people alone, are the motive force in the making of world history”, that “[t]he masses have boundless creative power”, and that

[a]ll reactionaries are paper tigers. In appearance, the reactionaries are terrifying, but in reality they are not so powerful. From a long-term point of view, it is not the reactionaries but the people who are really powerful.

Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung (Peking, China: Foreign Languages Press, 1966), at 118, 118, and 72. Thus, to turn the Bolsheviks’ own slogan to the purpose of America’s salvation: “There are no fortresses which ‘the good People’ cannot storm.”

In the final analysis, it is critically important that Trump should turn to “the good People”, trust “the good People”, empower “the good People”, and rely upon “the good People”. Not only for his own sake (which in the great scheme of things amounts to little), but also for their sake first and foremost (which amounts to everything). As modern Presidential campaigns illustrate, this country is steeped in its own bastard version of das Führerprinzip (the leader principle). As early as 1933, America had her “Chief” (Roosevelt), just as Germany had her Führer (Hitler), Italy her Duce (Mussolini), and Russia her Vozhd’ (Stalin), to be followed not long afterwards by Red China with her “Great Helmsman” (Mao). Today, all too many Americans view a President as someone whose purpose is to advance the agenda of their political party or special-interest group, not someone who should act unselfishly with and through WE THE PEOPLE so that THE PEOPLE themselves can become permanently the masters of their own destiny. Such approval of, or at least acquiescence in, rule from “the top down” must in short order prove fatal to popular self-government.In principle, it denies the precept of the Declaration that “Governments * * * instituted among Men[ ] deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed”—not from acceptance by “the governed” of “the leader’s” mere assertions of authority. In practice, it generates increasingly uncritical support for “the leader’s” program, then increasingly blind obedience to his dictates. Until society arrives at the terminal stage of suicidal political regimentation: Führer befehl, wir folgen (leader command, we follow).

Just as the strength of any pyramid resides at its base, not at its apex, so, too, with popular sovereignty—and with the Power of the Sword in WE THE PEOPLE’S hands for the purpose of “execut[ing] the Laws of the Union” through the Militia. In a constitutional republic, true authority and legitimate power never descend from “the top down”, but always arise—indeed, can be generated and exercised only—from “the bottom up”. Trump’s greatest achievement (were he capable of any truly great achievement) would be to put this truth into action. By one segment of the population he will be damned if he does; and, by another segment, damned if he does not; so he may as well be taken for a goat rather than a sheep. That goes for the rest of us, too.

© 2016 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

5-10-2016 8-55-33 AM

 

We THE People Present this Open Letter & Public Notice

May 16th, 2016 by

 

http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/10/open-letter-from-we-people.html To the following:

US Military, Pentagon Joint Chiefs, Flag Officers, Provost Marshall, Inspector General, and Office of Management & Budget, US Corporation and its Agents & Actors–an act of giving Public Notice.

We THE People who are the Civilian Authority with the superior lawfull standing over the U.S. Corporation=UNITED STATES CORPORATION and authority over the U.S. Military acting under the Original Jurisdiction of the United States Constitution 1789, Bill of Rights 1791 with the original 13th Amendment=”which removes persons who have accepted an entitlement from holding public office” as the United States of America, Republic form of Government, De Jure, standing as the true form of Government is proud to announce and notice the following effective IMMEDIATELY.

The purpose of this writing is to add the next pieces to the graphical explanation of the relationships between the US Corporation to Straw man and to Us – the living breathing men and women who occupy the geographical lands of the De Jure Constitutional Government for the United States of America.

We want to know that our boarders are watched and we are protected when we come and go either on pleasure or business.   We want to make sure we have a roof over our head, good food not GMO to eat, and the people who represent us at State and Federal levels are looking out for us and not their personal pocket books.

So we want to disconnect ourselves from the US Corporation both personally, State and Federal wise.  So the questions are many and what should we be aware of to disconnect.

On March 27, 1861, seven (7) southern states walked out of the Union along with several of the northern states under ”Sine Die” breaking the contract between the Federation and Union States. The states seceding from the Union were South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas.

This event caused the contract which consisted of the Articles of Confederation, the Organic Constitution of 1789 and the Bill of Rights of 1791 to be breached. 

Upon breaking this contract, the following happened: The Union of States relationship was suspended and the United States of America was suspended in its existence.

 Article I – Legislation was suspended; Under Parliament Congress, Congress ceased to exist as a lawful body and all lawful Republic governmental Seats were vacant*

Article II – Executive branch was suspended; Office of President was suspended – Office of the President was vacant* (President had no authority to declare war). At this point, the then sitting President had no power, no authority, his position as president was suspended and considered vacant by the De Jure Republic Constitutional Government.

Article III – Judicial Courts were suspended; Article III Judicial seats are vacated.*

* = per Administrative Court Judge in a North Carolina case FILE NO. : 11 CVS 1559

On April 15, 1861, President Lincoln executed the first executive order written by any President, Executive Order 1, Executive Orders are not constitutional however it is perceived as law by the use of television propagating the deception.  This is not correct; an Executive Order is the memo method of communicating between departments of a corporation and is not the law of the land.

 When Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander-in-Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by Constitutional Law; placing the American people under martial rule ever since that national emergency declared by President Lincoln.

The Constitution for the United States of America temporarily ceased to be the law of the land, and the President, Congress, and the Courts unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the national government in their own fashion, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were in place which afforded power or authority to enact any of the actions which were taken which presumed to place the nation under the new form of federal government control.

On April 17, 1861 and over the next five (5) weeks – seceding from the Union were the additional states of Virginia, North Carolina, Tennessee and Arkansas totaling eleven (11) confederate states.

In 1862, the unlawful congress redefined the word Person as a legal term of art, creating a fictional entity, fictional characterization, Straw man, corporate entity.  Definition: Person = Fictional Characterization which allowed the unlawful congress to say “that you can create, you can control”.

In 1864, the unlawfull congress redefining the word STATE to be District of Columbia.  They are setting a pattern for “that you can create, you can control”.  In Webster’s dictionary 1828, the definition for Columbia as a noun is America; the United States; a poetical appellation given in honor of Columbus, the discoverer.

Furthermore, the definition used today in US Corporation speeches, law, statutes, Court System for Person = Fictional Characterization and STATE= District of Columbia are hereby repealed, revoked and terminated because these words were redefined by an Unconstitutional congress to be used to entrap the living, breathing flesh and blood man or woman into debt slavery by the 14th amendment. This is spoken by the We THE People of the De Jure Constitutional Government for the United States of America.

The definition for Person and for State as per Webster dictionary 1828:

PERSON, noun per’sn. [Latin persona; said to be compounded of per, through or by, and sonus, sound; a Latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on the state.] 1. An individual human being consisting of body and soul. We apply the word to living beings only, possessed of a rational nature; the body when dead is not called a person, It is applied alike to a man, woman or child. A person is a thinking intelligent being: verb transitive, To represent as a person; to make to resemble; to image. [Not in use.]

STATE, noun [Latin, to stand, to be fixed.]  1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. We say, the body is in a sound state or it is in a weak state; or it has just recovered from a feeble state, The state of his health is good. The state of his mind is favorable for study. So we say, the state of public affairs calls for the exercise of talents and wisdom. In regard to foreign nations, our affairs are in a good state, So we say, single state and married state. Declare the past and present state of things.

STATE, verb transitive, 1. To set; to settle. [See Stated.]  2. To express the particulars of any thing verbally; to represent fully in words; to narrate; to recite. The witnesses stated all the circumstances of the transaction. They are enjoined to state all the particulars. It is the business of the advocate to state the whole case. Let the question be fairly stated.

As we continue with the for mentioned timeline, The US Corporation continues to attack the vacant seats of the De Jure Constitutional Government, its people and the lands by writing Executive Orders, Acts and Treaties created by the US Corporation that starts with the “Act of 1871.”, Creating the District of Columbia and defining it as a state while the Union States are redefined as territories under the District of Columbia, the “Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933 (49STAT3097) Treaty Series 881”, and the “International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945,” since all of these ACT’s and Treaty references were created by an Unconstitutional government. We THE People are not obligated nor bound by these unconstitutional instruments.

That the Pan American treaty of 12-26-1933 (49 STAT 3097) Treaty Series 881 – (Convention on Rights and Duties of States) stated CONGRESS replaced STATUTES with international law, placing all states under international law.

              That the International Organization Immunities Act of 12-9-1945 – – Congress relinquished every public office over to the UN. Local governments up to the president fall under UN jurisdiction. Congress gave the UN the right to dictate what laws will be international & gave them the right to tax the States.

              That the International Reorganization Rescind Act- Congress put this into form but they never took action to rescind the act. Fairly recently an Ohio judge filed suit claiming that Congress did not have the right to relinquish government authority over to the UN (a corporation or foreign country) and that the Congressional act was a constitutional violation because they didn’t put it to the States or the people to agree on it. In 2005 the US Supreme court declined to hear the case therefore all public offices are under UN jurisdiction & they are not American Citizens.

Furthermore, the action by the US Corporation has been Fraudulent in representation of the people of the United States of America as well as taking advantage of minors.  The individuals who represent this corporation are not We THE Peoples’ government and these individuals are by lawful governing considered to be Corporate CONTRACTORS =ACTORS who do not represent the Political Will of the People.  We THE People do hereby declare the US Corporation governs NOTHING since they are nothing more than an unlawful criminal organization.  The US Corporation is physically bound to White House = CEO office and Capital Building = Board of Directors office on the land they call District of Columbia. They have NO authority over the people or lands of the United States of America or the District of Columbia.

Furthermore, all adhesion contracts are suspended and revoked due to the fraudulent actions by US Corporation and Banking industry against the living breathing flesh and blood men and women of the United States of America. 

Adhesion contract examples (not a complete list):

Minor – certified birth certificate on bonded paper, Social Security Number, Driver License;

Adult – Marriage License, Voter Registration, License as Contractor, usage of Zip Code, USPS – FEMA green address plates for mailboxes, IRS – income filings signature binds a person to pay Unconstitutional taxes which is a fraudulent act since taxation repealed in 1939, taxation without representation and not disclosing taxation is voluntary;

Other – the autograph line on personal checks is micro-printed by Banking Industry further binding parties to debt; mortgages with no jurisdictional representation and much more.

Furthermore, the Bretton Woods Agreement Act with the association of the US Corporation with the CROWN = Rothschild Banking Cartel, the International Monetary Fund are foreign entities and Unconstitutional and are suspended and revoked by We THE People of the De Jure Constitutional Government for the United States of America. 

  1. Bretton Woods Agreements Act, International Monetary Fund/World Bank Group [As Amended Through P.L. 112–74, Enacted December 23, 2011]

AN ACT To provide for the participation of the United States in the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SHORT TITLE

SECTION 1, 22 U.S.C. 286 note, This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bretton Woods Agreements Act’’.

ACCEPTANCE OF MEMBERSHIP

SEC. 2, 22 U.S.C. 286, The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Monetary Fund (herein after referred to as the ‘‘Fund’’), and in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Bank’’), provided for the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the archives of the Department of State.

APPOINTMENT OF GOVERNORS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, AND ALTERNATES

SEC. 3.1, 22 U.S.C. 286a, (a) The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a governor of the Fund who shall also serve as governor of the Bank, and an executive director of the Fund and an executive director of the Bank. The executive directors so appointed shall also serve provisional executive directors of the Fund and the Bank for the purposes of the respective Articles of Agreement. The term of office for the governor of the Fund and of the Bank shall be five years. The term of office for the executive directors shall be two years, but the executive directors shall remain in office until their successors have been appointed. (b) The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint an alternate for the governor of the fund and an alternate for the governor of the Bank. 2 The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint an alternate for F:COMPIFIBRETTON.  December 23, 2011.

Furthermore, the United Nations has been given direct orders to stand down and to leave the Republic State of New York and the entire geographical lands known as United States of America.  No department of our government shall report to a foreign agency or foreign agent.  United Nations failure to comply shows their intent to continue to carry forward the criminal Agenda 21 of mass murder of people in the United States of American and the World.  It is the duty and obligation of the Military to remove these criminal power seekers from our lands.

We THE People now understand that we have been fooled, manipulated and coerced by fraudulent acts committed by Abraham Lincoln and the US Corporation through their adhesion contracts for their financial gains.

Furthermore, The POPE on July 11 and effective September 1, 2013 issued a APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS ON THE JURISDICTION OF THE JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES OF VATICAN CITY STATE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS. 

Pope Francis Apostolic Letter effectively stripped away the immunity of all judges, attorneys, government officials and all entities established under the Roman Curia.  Since “All” corporations are established under the Roman Curia they have their immunity stripped away including their C level, Executive level, Office of General Council, and significant operational staff.

All of these “persons” can be held accountable for war crimes, crimes against humanity, for the unlawful restrictions of the liberties of the divine spirit incarnate; for failure to settle the accounts; for continued prosecution of claims already settled, etc. Definition: Divine Spirit is humanity.

Over the past several years, there has been a great and powerful movement by the patriots and others to take back our Unalienable rights, pronouns as UN-A-LIEN-ABLE or said Not-a-lien-able right.  This means no one can take these from us as per the bible and our fore fathers.   To stand up the republic once again and dissolve the US Corporation and rid ourselves of the banking cartels who direct the central banking wars for their profit.  

On October 21st, 2012, a group of living breathing men and woman meet with a specific intent to reseat our Federal government. They did reseat our United States of America as a sovereign Nation once again.  Along with that comes the re-instatement of the contract between Federal and Union States or Nation States.  We THE People stand once again under the De Jure Constitutional Government, Republic form of Government which represents the People of this great land known as United States of America.  The offices that have sat vacant since March 27 1861 are now being filled with men and woman from this nation.

By the Political Will of We THE People we hereby claim the following:

  • Revocation of all the unconstitutional acts, treaties, proclamations, etc. since March 27 1861, 
  • The law of the land is Geneva & King James Bible, Common Law, Articles of Confederation, the Organic Constitution of 1789, the Bill of Rights of 1791 and Northwest Ordinance.  These laws apply to all 50 Nation States.
  • US Corporation is Confined to the geographical area called the District of Columbia, The US Corporation is physically bound to White House = CEO office and Capital Building = Board of Directors office.
  • The US Corporation has NO authority over the people or lands of the United States of America and the people or land of the District of Columbia.
  • Revocation of all adhesion contracts by US Corporation due to their fraudulent actions against the people. 
  • The IRS and Federal Reverse are associated with US Corporation and IMF which have no authority to operate on the lands of the United States of America.
  • The De Jure Constitutional Government declares Martial law over the US Corporation and the land known as Washington DC.  Washington DC will be patrolled by the United States Military and Militias of the states assigned to do so.
  • We THE People will consider criminal charges against all the actors, agents and their supporting staff as far back as necessary …

It is the Political Will of We THE People~

Notice to Agent is notice to Principal

Notice to Principal is notice to Agent

5-10-2016 8-55-33 AM

 

 

HOW AMERICA’S POLICE BECAME AN ARMY: THE 1033 PROGRAM

May 11th, 2016 by

5-11-2016 9-49-16 AM

By Jeffrey Phillips | May 9, 2016

REUTERS/MARIO ANZUONI

As many have noted, Ferguson, Missouri, currently looks like a war zone. And its police—kitted out with Marine-issue camouflage and military-grade body armor, toting short-barreled assault rifles, and rolling around in armored vehicles—are indistinguishable from soldiers.

America has been quietly arming its police for battle since the early 1990s.

Faced with a bloated military and what it perceived as a worsening drug crisis, the 101st Congress in 1990 enacted the National Defense Authorization Act. Section 1208 of the NDAA allowed the Secretary of Defense to “transfer to Federal and State agencies personal property of the Department of Defense, including small arms and ammunition, that the Secretary determines is— (A) suitable for use by such agencies in counter-drug activities; and (B) excess to the needs of the Department of Defense.” It was called the 1208 Program. In 1996, Congress replaced Section 1208 with Section 1033.

 

The idea was that if the U.S. wanted its police to act like drug warriors, it should equip them like warriors, which it has—to the tune of around $4.3 billion in equipment, according to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union. The St. Louis County Police Department’s annual budget is around $160 million. By providing law enforcement agencies with surplus military equipment free of charge, the NDAA encourages police to employ military weapons and military tactics.

1033 procurements are not matters of public record. And the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), which coordinates distribution of military surplus, refuses to reveal the names of agencies requesting “tactical” items, like assault rifles and MRAPs — for security reasons, a spokesperson for DLA told Newsweek via email. One can only trace “tactical” items as far the county of the requesting agency. In the case of Ferguson, that means St. Louis County.

St. Louis County law enforcement agencies have, through the 1033 Program, acquired the following “tactical” equipment, according to Mike O’Connell, Communications Director for the Missouri Department of Public Safety:

Despite the fact that police in Ferguson have been photographed with a matte black vehicle which appears to be a “Bearcat” MRAP, O’Connell told Newsweek that no St. Louis County law enforcement agencies have acquired any MRAPs through the 1033 program.

 

If the vehicle in the above Reuters photo is indeed an MRAP and not one of the nine “utility trucks” acquired by St. Louis County law enforcement, O’Connell said he does not know where it came from.

Police in Watertown, Connecticut, (population 22,514) recently acquired a mine-resistant, ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicle (sticker price: $733,000), designed to protect soldiers from roadside bombs, for $2,800. There has never been a landmine reported in Watertown, Connecticut.

Police in small towns in Michigan and Indiana have used the 1033 Program to acquire “MRAP armored troop carriers, night-vision rifle scopes, camouflage fatigues, Humvees and dozens of M16 automatic rifles,” the South Bend Tribune reported.

And police in Bloomington, Georgia, (population: 2,713) acquired four grenade launchers through the program, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported.

Given the proliferation of military weapons and military training among America’s police departments, the use of military force and military tactics is not surprising. When your only tool is a hammer, after all, every problem looks like a nail.

Update: Missouri DPS Communications Director O’Connell on Thursday morning sent the following e-mail confirming that St. Louis law enforcement agencies also received 12 5.56 millimeter rifles and six .45 caliber pistols as part of 1033 Program.

Our DoD program rep was curious why no weapons showed up in her search yesterday. She searched a different way this morning and it showed that twelve 5.56 millimeter rifles and six .45 caliber pistols went to St. Louis County law enforcement agencies between Aug. 2, 2010 and Feb. 13, 2013. This was erroneously omitted from the report I sent you last night. She’s double checked again this morning and is confident this was the only omission.

Sorry for the oversight.

Mike

5-10-2016 8-55-33 AM

World Leaders Are Cross Matching Troops to Seize Guns and Impose Martial Law

May 9th, 2016 by

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com

5-9-2016 11-19-10 AMOLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I will not accuse Dave of being a scare monger, but I have a hard time believing everything he publishes. However this time he has raised a problem I have not formerly applied much importance on, and that is the number of foreign troops he expects to show up. This could be a real problem in a Nation too self centered to have demanded a contingent of State Militias. As it stands now with our dumbed down population, and lack of secure communications, a counter offensive is sure suicide, and only a handful of us will stand up and fight back. Not all of us are willing to die on our knees. Good luck America, you had a good run!

By Dave Hodges

 This picture and depicts Russian soldiers at Ft. Carson. The Russians and other foreign troops (e.g. Germans, Canadians, Danes) are part of Jade Helm. They are here to carry out the mission should American troops stand down.

 All world leaders, who are proxies for the New World Order know that their own individual military forces will not murder their own people in large enough numbers to make a difference with regard to citizen resistance to a nation’s fall into absolute tyranny. 

The world is now witnessing the transfer of domestic military power to foreign entities and every citizen of every modern country in the world, should be extremely fearful. These foreign troops will have no compunction as to how many people that they will murder on the path to establishing a New World Order.  

There are clear signs that the globalists are making their move to subjugate the entire G-20, and they are making that move, NOW.

The Bloodbath Will Commence with the Fall of the American Economy

Australia In Danger!  

ABC News in Australia has announced that the Australian Government has just released a Multi- Billion Dollar Deal made with Singapore to House and Rotate 14,000 Singapore Soldiers. And of course, under the principle of incrementalism, it is only 14,000 troops today, but it could just as easily become 140,000 foreign troops tomorrow.

Under the agreement, that will bring combat troops from Singapore  to Australia, the Australian people would fund the cost of expanding the Shoal water Bay Training Area and the Townsville Field Training Area, both in the north of Queensland state.

This is a move predicated towards the implementation of martial law and this also provides the foreign interlopers a permanent base of operations.

Many Australians have not surrendered their guns because many of them anticipated what was coming, namely, total economic collapse courtesy of the derivatives, and absolute gun confiscation which will be enforced with extreme prejudice. The Australian courts will not be involved in the coming martial law and ensuing gun confiscation activities. Foreign officers, in their field command capacity will be given the Carte Blanche authority to enforce gun confiscation to the letter of the law.

 The Australian government has sold out their citizens and have set them up for foreign occupation the roll out a brutal martial law.

No Difference Between Australia and America

There is clear evidence that the foreign soldiers are going to be trained to take over the FEMA Camps and the question as to whether American forces would fire upon American citizens is a moot point.

Training Foreigners To Take Over the Camps

“This appendix addresses aspects of developing confinement officers in other countries. For the purposes of this appendix, the terms foreign and HN confinement officers are synonymous”.

Appendix N
Foreign Confinement Officer Training Program

Training U.S. Trainers

N-43. Soldiers and Marines who are assigned training missions receive a course of preparation to deal with the specific requirements of developing the target HN confinement officers (i.e. foreign detention officers). The course should emphasize the cultural background of the HN, introduce its language (to include specific confinement-related terms and phrases) and provide insights into cultural tips for developing a good rapport with HN personnel.

The beginning of this section attempts to create the illusion that foreign troops will be under the complete control of Army personnel. However, I believe it is likely that the mass exterminations of the detainees will take place when the American military is withdrawn from the facilities. If there was any doubt as to the fact that our soon-to-be jailers will be foreign and will have no hesitation to carry out mass genocide, the following regulation from the document should remove all doubt.

Training Methods
N-48. Training programs are designed to prepare HN personnel to eventually train themselves. Indigenous trainers are the best trainers and should be used to the maximum extent possible.

For nearly four years, I have interviewed numerous eyewitnesses on my talk show about the presence of foreign troops (mostly Russian) training on American soil. Sherrie Wilcox has presented videotape and still photo evidence. Others have provided their firsthand accounts of these events. I have detailed the existence of a FEMA bilateral agreement with the Russians to bring in 15,000 soldiers for “disaster training”.  And despite all the evidence, there are people who have roundly criticized The Common Sense Show for accurately claiming there are foreign troops on American soil. Those who have refused to look at the evidence owe my people an apology. Second, the “bury their head in the sand crowd” ,will never know what will hit them when all hell breaks loose.

New World Order Forces Preparing to Counter American Military Forces Fighting a Guerrilla War

5-9-2016 11-22-54 AMAustralia, Singapore, or America, There Is No Difference As to What Is Coming

In the first week of February, I published several documents pertaining to UWEX 16, including the following advertisement for “role players” in this “drill”. The drill involves the following:

5-9-2016 11-24-36 AM

Does anyone else find it interesting that your government is practicing to fight rogue elements of the of the US military who are engaged in a guerrilla war?

Pulling Out the Stops

5-9-2016 11-25-52 AMMark Zuckerberg censoring Donald Trump.

Can Donald Trump save America and the world from global depression and martial law? Alex Jones weighs in on this topic.

Facebook has revealed that they have the ability and permission to block Trump posts. That by itself, may not mean much except to reveal Facebook’s position in the NWO. However, this action may be designed to assist Hillary.

The Hillary Factor

5-9-2016 11-28-26 AMThe Hillary Factor

“I support Australia’s system of gun control”

One of Clinton’s main campaign positions is predicated on imitating the Australian gun control model.

5-9-2016 11-29-52 AM

The fallacy of Australian Gun Control

Isn’t it curious that Clinton would like to have the same impact on American individual security as will the Singapore military in Australia?

Conclusion

The game plan is apparent. World leaders will cross-match their troops in attempt to subjugate each other’s citizens who would dare to resist such things as gun confiscation efforts. In the past, Obama has made it clear he has access to Russians, Chinese and now even Cubans. Hillary Clinton has exposed her hand as she has announced she will implement gun confiscation, Australian style. Further, FEMA camps will ultimately be manned by foreign soldiers. By the way, Singapore’s pilots train at Luke Air Force Base (Glendale, AZ.) on American F-16’s. Isn’t that interesting?

I would say that Trump has his hands full.

10 13 11 flagbar

 

STANDING GUARD OR STANDING DOWN?

May 7th, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin284.htm

3-27-2016 1-48-28 PM

By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
May 7, 2016

NewsWithViews.com

I always approach each edition of the National Rifle Association’s magazine, American Rifleman, with some little trepidation, because of the disturbing content that all too often crops up in its editorials. The latest edition (May 2016) has once again proven that I am not merely a victim of intellectual paranoia.

In his regular column, “Standing Guard”, the NRA’s Executive Vice President, Wayne LaPierre, advises his readers that “When it Comes to Gun Rights, 2016 Election Is About the Court, Too”. The thrust of the column is Mr. LaPierre’s reiteration of the necessity for the NRA’s supporters to “elect a president who believes and will fight for the Second Amendment”, as well as to “elect a [Charles] Schumer-proof United States Senate and maintain the current Second Amendment majority”. As I have explained in an earlier NewsWithViews commentary entitled “NRA, Second Amendment, and ‘We the People’”, reliance on elections alone (even if they are conducted honestly) is an inadequate means to “fight for the Second Amendment”. For instance, no candidate for “the Office of President” who fails to champion revitalization of the Militia is actually “fight[ing] for the second Amendment” to the full extent the Constitution requires. After all, how can a candidate for that office expect to fulfill his constitutional authority and responsibility as “Commander in Chief * * * of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States”, when for all practical purposes “the Militia of the several States” are moribund throughout this country? Is not such a candidate’s “Job One” to correct that situation? The answer being obvious, I shall not rehash that matter here.

More disquieting in Mr. LaPierre’s column is his critique of certain statements made by the Justices who dissented from the Supreme Court’s decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago—namely, Justices Stevens, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Ginsburg. To be sure, their pronouncements certainly warrant scathing criticism, if not raucous ridicule. Unfortunately, Mr. LaPierre’s rejoinders are not much less faulty—perhaps, are even more indefensible, coming as they do from an ostensible proponent of the Second Amendment. He is not so much “standing guard” over the Amendment, as standing down from that purpose.

  1. Mr. Lapierre quotes Justice Stevens in Heller as contending that:

The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well regulated militia … there is no indication that the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution.

Now, no one who reads all twenty-seven words of the Second Amendment—not just the last fourteen, which the NRA emphasizes to the virtual exclusion of the first thirteen (a mistake, curiously enough, which Justice Stevens did not make)—can doubt that Justice Stevens was perfectly correct (albeit, I suspect, only accidentally so) to assert that “[t]he Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well regulated militia”. Nonetheless, he missed the essential point: that, if the people have a right “to maintain a well regulated militia” in each State, then there must actually be, in each State, “[a] well regulated Militia”, organized according to constitutional principles drawn from pre-constitutional American history, in which Militia “the people” as a whole actually participate. The “right of the people” thus imposes a corresponding duty, not only on each of “the several States”, but also on the General Government (primarily, through Congress), to ensure that such Militia are fully enrolled, organized, armed, disciplined, and governed at all times. That “right of the people” is also a duty of “the people” to serve in such Militia, because constitutional Militia are establishments with near-universal compulsory membership. They are the only organizations the Constitution recognizes which are based upon a general “draft”. Full support for these assertions can be found in my book Constitutional “Homeland Security”, Volume Two, The Sword and Sovereignty (Front Royal, Virginia: CD-ROM Edition, 2012), and therefore need not be repeated here.

What Justice Stevens did not understand (or refused to acknowledge) is that, as Article 13 of Virginia’s Declaration of Rights (1776) made clear, “a well regulated militia” is “composed of the body of the people, trained to arms”. That means that every able-bodied adult American (other than conscientious objectors) not only must be suitably armed as an individual, but also must be trained to use his arms effectively in a collective effort in aid of the community’s self-defense. Of course, the guarantee that each and every eligible individual always possesses arms suitable for some kind of Militia service will also ensure that such arms are available at all times for every such individual’s personal self-defense. So, pace Justice Stevens, by “protect[ing] the right of the people * * * to maintain * * * well regulated militia”, “the Framers” did indeed “enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution”, for individuals acting as individuals in their own personal defense as well as for individuals acting collectively in defense of the community.

We know this with apodictic certainty because the very first constitutional authority and responsibility of the Militia is “to execute the Laws of the Union”, as well as the laws of their own States. And self-defense—whether exercised on behalf of the community as a whole or of a single individual—is the execution of the very highest of all human laws. As Sir William Blackstone (no mean student of the common law) explained with respect to the “defence of one’s self”:

the law * * * makes it lawful in [an individual] to do himself that immediate justice, to which he is prompted by nature, and which no prudential motives are strong enough to restrain. It considers that the future process of law is by no means an adequate remedy for injuries accompanied with force; since it is impossible to say, to what wanton lengths of rapine or cruelty outrages of this sort might be carried, unless it were permitted a man immediately to oppose one violence with another. Self-defense, therefore, as it is justly called the primary law of nature, so it is not, neither can it be in fact, taken away by the law of society.

Commentaries on the Laws of England (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Robert Bell, 1772), Volume 3, at 3-4.

Self-evidently, then, individual self-defense is, in fact and law, a microcosmic example of the macrocosmic right and duty of the Militia to execute “the primary law of nature” (and vice versa). This should be obvious, too, from the Second Amendment. For “the security of a free State” could hardly exist if individuals were unable to protect themselves, as individuals, from lone aggressors to the selfsame extent that they were able to protect themselves, as a community, from concerted attacks by large numbers of domestic or foreign aggressors (and vice versa). “A well regulated Militia” defends the community. The community, however, is composed of individuals. So, in defending the community, the members of the Militia are defending themselves as individuals, too. And even when an individual is simply defending himself against a single attacker in an isolated confrontation, he is also defending the community, because he is executing the very highest law of the community against the aggressor under circumstances in which no one else can come to his aid.

It is understandable that someone such as Justice Stevens could be hopelessly confused on this score. What, though, is to be said of Mr. LaPierre, who attacks Justice Stevens’ statement as “that arrogant defamation of liberty—utterly denigrating the individual right to keep and bear arms”. Is it conceivable that for Justice Stevens to link “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” with the Militia is an “arrogant defamation of liberty”, when the Second Amendment itself identifies “[a] well regulated Militia” as “necessary to the security of a free State”? Do individuals in “a free State” not enjoy “liberty”? And, if they do (as is incontestably the case), is not “[a] well regulated Militia * * * necessary to the security” of their “liberty”? Or is the Constitution wrong on that point? One wonders whether Mr. LaPierre has ever pondered such questions.

  1. Mr. LaPierre then quotes Justice Breyer’s dissent in McDonald:

“[T]he Framers did not write the Second Amendment in order to protect a private right of armed self-defense.” And “By its terms, the Second Amendment does not apply to the States; read properly, it does not even apply to individuals outside of the militia context.”
Justice Breyer fumed. “After all, the Amendment’s militia-related purpose is primarily to protect the States from federal regulation, not to protect individuals.”

Of course, Mr. LaPierre is fully justified in treating these statements as rank gibberish—

First, as explained above, the Second Amendment certainly does “protect a private right of armed self-defense”. Can even Justice Breyer believe that a member of the Militia, required by law to possess a firearm in his own home at all times, does not enjoy a “private right” to employ that firearm for personal self-defense, in addition to his right and duty as a member of the Militia to execute the law against whoever attacks him?

Second, to what vanishingly small set of citizens does the Second Amendment not apply, because the constituent individuals are “outside of the Militia context”? “A well regulated Militia” includes all able-bodied adults from, typically, 16 years of age on up. Only individuals convicted of the most serious crimes, and those who (although otherwise able-bodied) suffer from some disabling mental disease or defect, are excluded. (Conscientious objectors are not required to possess firearms, but must perform some other Militia service.)

Third, the right—and duty—of “the people to keep and bear Arms” so as to be able to serve in “well regulated Militia” must apply first and foremost to and in their own States, because the Militia are “the Militia of the several States”, not “the Militia of the United States”. Do not the States themselves enjoy a right and labor under a duty to provide in their own territories what the Constitution declares to be “necessary to the security of a free State” everywhere without exception throughout the Union? Is their “security” as “free State[s]” to be left to the mercies of errant public officials in the General Government? What if insouciant, incompetent, or disloyal officials of that government fail, neglect, or refuse to provide the requisite measures of “security”? Must “free State[s]” then collapse throughout the United States, with no recourse in self-help?

To be sure, Congress labors under the constitutional duty “[t]o provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia” for the purposes of “execut[ing] the Laws of the Union, suppress[ing] Insurrections and repel[ling] Invasions”. But what has it done to date (actually, since 1903)? It has consigned almost all Americans to the constitutionally oxymoronic “unorganized militia”, leaving them unprepared to perform any Militia service in defense of either their communities or themselves as individuals. Were the right and duty of “the people” to serve in “well regulated Militia” fully enforced by the States, though, Congress’s default would not matter to a critical degree, because Militia properly “well regulated” by their own States would be prepared to fulfill all of the responsibilities “necessary to the security of a free State”, including the three the Constitution specifies.

Fourth, the General Government’s only regulatory authority in the premises is to organize, arm, discipline, and train the Militia, and to govern such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, for one or more of the three explicit constitutional purposes quoted above, and for nothing else. The Constitution authorizes no other regulation—and most emphatically no regulation which directly violates “the supreme Law of the Land” by purporting to “unorganize” or “disarm” the Militia. Furthermore, an unconstitutional regulation of the Militia which harms the States necessarily harms “the body of the people” who make up the Militia, and therefore harms the vast majority of the able-bodied adult individuals who make up society. So, pace Justice Breyer, if the Second Amendment provides any protection at all, it assuredly “protect[s] individuals”.

But if Justice Breyer is all wet, does Mr. Lapierre stand on drier ground? Does Mr. LaPierre imagine that “the people” have no right to require their own States to maintain the very—indeed, the only—institutions which the Constitution declares to be “necessary to the security of a free State”? Are the States to be suffered to behave as other than “free State[s]” by simply dispensing with their Militia? One would hope not. Yet is this not the terminus to which acceptance of “the individual right to keep and bear arms”, so precious to Mr. LaPierre, now leads this country?

  1. Mr. LaPierre then scoffs at what he calls Justice Stevens’ “off-the-wall dissent” in McDonald:

Stevens wrote, “[T]he experience of other advanced democracies, including those that share our British heritage, undercuts the notion that an expansive right to keep and bear arms is intrinsic to ordered liberty. …
“[I]t is silly—indeed, arrogant—to think we have nothing to learn from the billions of people beyond our borders.”

Mr. LaPierre rightly derides this claptrap.

The laws of foreign nations are both irrelevant and impertinent with respect to how America’s Constitution should be construed and applied. As to foreign nations in general, I have written a book to that effect. How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary (San Antonio, Texas: Vision Forum Ministries, 2004). As to Great Britain in particular, immediately pre-constitutional American history provides a veritable library, culminating in the record of General Gage’s attempt to impose “gun control” on the Colonists in Lexington and Concord in 1775—the event memorialized, for example, as part of “A Declaration by the Representatives of the United Colonies of North America, now met in General Congress at Philadelphia, setting forth the causes and necessity of their taking up arms” (Thursday, 6 July 1775), Journals of the Continental Congress, Volume 2, at 150-151. (In this regard, Mr. LaPierre would do well to recall that Americans resisted British tyranny on 19 April 1775, not by anarchic exercises of some imaginary “individual right to keep and bear arms”, but by turning out in a collective fashion as Local units of the Militia of Massachusetts.)

Pace Justice Stevens, Americans’ first task must be to learn, not from foreign sources but from their own Constitution, what “liberty” means—and especially what institutions and practices are required to preserve it. The most important precept (because the Constitution singles it out) is that “[a] well regulated Militia”—not an imaginary “individual right to keep and bear arms”—is “necessary to the security of a free State”. Having learned that much, Americans can compare the state of “liberty” in their own country (in which a large proportion of the citizenry remains armed), with the general nonexistence of “liberty” in foreign nations (in which disarmament of the populace is the usual state of affairs). What America’s Founding Fathers understood as “liberty” under “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God” may be slipping into an increasingly perilous condition in this country; but it is largely defunct almost everywhere else. What (in Justice Stevens’ words) “we have * * * to learn about liberty from the billions of people beyond our borders” is that the deterioration of “liberty” here and its elimination there are not mere accidents of history. They derive from disregard of the first thirteen words of the Second Amendment in this country, and from the absence of the entire text of that Amendment in the organic laws of other countries.

  1. Finally, Mr. LaPierre rightly chides Justice Ginsburg for once saying that she “would not look to the U.S. Constitution if [she] were drafting a constitution * * * . [She] might look to the Constitution of South Africa[.]” “You might ask,” writes Mr. LaPierre, “why would a U.S. Supreme Court justice prefer another constitution to that which was forged in Philadelphia more than 200 years ago?” The explanation as to Justice Ginsburg, no doubt, is that she subscribes to a legal and political ideology incompatible with—indeed, diametrically opposed to—the principles of America’s Constitution, and therefore “prefer[s] another constitution” of her own imagining. What, though, is the explanation as to Mr. LaPierre?

Exactly what constitution, informed by what legal and political ideology, does he prefer? Apparently, it is a constitution with no firm grounding in pre-constitutional American legal history, a constitution to be construed on the basis of an ideology which licenses its exponents to dissect the Second Amendment, to disregard if not discard the Amendment’s first thirteen words, to disrespect the judgment of the Founders that “[a] well regulated Militia” is “necessary to the security of a free State”, and to discourage the members of the NRA, as well as those sympathetic to it throughout this country, from associating themselves with the Militia in thought, word, and deed, except when they deny that the Militia have any significant relationship to “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms”.

Misinterpretations of the Constitution with such an undercurrent of animosity towards the Militia could be expected to be broadcast by a certain “poverty” law center, notorious for its rabid opposition to the Second Amendment. Why they keep emanating from the NRA, however, passes understanding. Perhaps it really is true that whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Unfortunately, if allowed to fester much longer this particular madness will destroy, not only the NRA, but the rest of us as well.

© 2016 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved

 Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School).

For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.

He has written numerous monographs and articles in scholarly journals, and lectured throughout the county. His most recent work on money and banking is the two-volume Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution (2002), the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective. www.piecesofeight.us

He is also the co-author (under a nom de plume) of the political novel CRA$HMAKER: A Federal Affaire (2000), a not-so-fictional story of an engineered crash of the Federal Reserve System, and the political upheaval it causes. www.crashmaker.com

His latest book is: “How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary” … and Constitutional “Homeland Security,” Volume One, The Nation in Arms…

He can be reached at his new address:
52 Stonegate Court
Front Royal, VA 22630.

E-Mail: Not available

 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

 

There is no logic in a man as intellectually accomplished as Mr. Vieira when he ignores the true issue confronting American’s. Take this to the bank Dr. Vieira there is no active constitutional republic on this Continent, which negates any reliance on the Original Constitution for the United States of America. That Constitution was over-run by the Constitution of the United States of America, and followed by several versions of privately owned Corporations, which is why we have NEVER had a militia of the several states, and never will due to the IGNORANCE of the people. UNLESS a hundred million people read this book, absolute tyranny is just around the corner. You Know Something is Wrong When…..: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause (Paperback) by Judge Anna Maria Riezinger & James Clinton Belcher

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1491279184/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk

 

 

NEW WORLD ORDER COMBAT ARMS SURVEY

May 5th, 2016 by

http://www.knology.net/~bilrum/UN29palms.htm

5-5-2016 8-36-53 AM

Question # 46

“I Would Fire Upon U.S. Citizens…”

The RESISTER has confirmed that US Navy SEAL platoons, including SEAL Team Six, Marine combat veterans stationed at Twenty-Nine Palms, CA, and Marine basic trainees at Camp Pendelton, CA, have been administered a questionnaire asking, among other things, if they would “…fire upon US citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the US government.”

The questionnaire was first administered to operators by the commanders of SEAL Team Six on 15 September 1993, then subsequently to the remaining SEAL platoons throughout September and October. Rumors began circulating in November that US Army DELTA operators were given the same or similar questionnaire. The SF Underground had been aware of the questionnaire since late September but our observers had been unable to secure a copy or confirm other than its substance consisted of questions pertaining to the subordination of the US Military to the UN and confiscation of the firearms of US citizens. In early January, 1994, we obtained a copy of the questionnaire from one of our DOD sympathizers but lacking corroboration we ran the story in Vol.I, No.1 of The RESISTER as a rumor.

On January 22, 1994, one of our observers copied a chilling message off the Internet from Petty Officer 2nd Class W. Kelly, US Navy Special Warfare Team Six, to D. Hawkins, Re: Gun Confiscation. Kelly began by stating that the questionnaire was “…to find out if we would follow the orders of commanding officers without question.” (Kelly omitted the fact that the questionnaire assumes “commanding officers” gives equal authority to UN officers commanding US forces.) Kelly continued; “If you wish to find out how I answered I said yes I would fire and kill all persons attempting to resist…we aren’t around to be the good guys.” Remember, Kelly is referring to American civilians.

In February, 1994, MODERN GUN magazine ran a story on the elusive questionnaire which was subsequently circulated by various patriotic citizens groups. Then, on 10 May, 1994, the questionnaire was administered to Marine Desert Storm veterans at Twenty-Nine Palms, CA. A Marine smuggled a copy of the questionnaire out of the testing center and mailed it on 15 May, 1994, with a cover letter, to the editor of THE NEW AMERICAN, which ran the story in their July 11, 1994, issue. THE NEW AMERICAN quotes the Marine’s impression that the questionnaire “was just research for this (Navy) commander’s(sp) degree.” The RESISTER obtained a copy of the Marine’s letter, which actually states: “A Navy Commander came before us and said he was working on his masters degree and he was writing a paper about giving up our military’s soverenty(sp) to the United Nations Secretary General.”

The official DOD lie surrounding the questionnaire entitled “Combat Arms Survey,” supports that of the Navy Commander. Significantly, the Combat Arms Survey was first given at the time Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 25 was being prepared. The RESISTER’s correspondent in the Pentagon staff of the Joint Chiefs of Staff confirms that PDD 25 surrenders control of the U.S. military to the United Nations. (A cursory survey of articles written by MACOM commanders and staff members in official military journals for the past year reveals a universal acceptance of U.N. control of the American military.)

The RESISTER has been eliciting responses to the questionnaire for the past year. Frighteningly, among service members with less than 10 years of service, 63% agree or strongly agree with question # 46: “I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government.” Among new recruits almost 90% give the response: “If it’s the law and they order me to do it I guess it’s okay.” Our federally controlled public schools have done their job.

Of those with more than 15 years of service, 87% replied “disagree” or “strongly disagree.” Responses by members of the Special Forces Underground were unprintable; basically, there will not be many officers who give that order more than once.

The RESISTER has enclosed a copy of the Combat Arms Survey with this issue. As you read it pay particular attention to the qualifiers and their relation to recent articles in the official publications of the Department of Defense, the civilian media, and the policies of the federal government. * 

Editorial Note The enclosed Combat Arms Survey is a true and accurate reproduction of the contents of the questionnaire. We altered the format to accommodate the The RESISTER’s layout. THE EDITOR

COMBAT ARMS SURVEY

This questionnaire is to gather data concerning the attitudes of combat trained personnel with regards to nontraditional missions. All of your responses are confidential. Write your answers directly on the questionnaire form. In Part II, place an “X” in the space provided for your response.

Part I. Demographics

  1. What service are you in?
  2. What is your pay grade? (e.g. E-7, O-7)
  3. What is your MOS code and description?
  4. What is your highest level of education in years?
  5. How many months did you serve in Operation Desert Storm/Desert Shield?
  6. How many months did you serve in Somalia?
  7. What state or country did you primarily reside in during childhood?

Part II. Attitudes

Do you feel that U.S. Combat troops should be used within the United States for any of the following missions?

  1. Drug enforcement

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Security at national events (e.g. Olympic Games, Super Bowl)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Environmental disaster clean-up

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Substitute teachers in public schools

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Community assistance programs (e.g. landscaping, environmental clean-up,

road repair, animal control)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Federal and state prison guards

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. National emergency police force

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Advisors to S.W.A.T. units, the FBI or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and

Firearms (B.A.T.F.)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Border patrol (e.g. prevention of illegal aliens into U.S. territory)

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops under U.S. command should be used in other countries for and of the following United Nations missions?

 

  1. Drug enforcement

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Environmental disaster clean-up

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Peace keeping

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Nation building (Reconstruct civil government, develop public school

system, develop or improve public transportation system, etc.)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical supplies, temporary housing,

and clothing)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used in other countries, under command of non-U.S. officers appointed by the United Nations for any of the following missions?

 

  1. Drug enforcement

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Environmental disaster clean-up

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Peace keeping

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Nation building (Reconstruct civil government, develop public school

system, develop or improve public transportation system, etc.)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical supplies, temporary housing,

and clothing)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. Police action (e.g. Korea, Vietnam, but serving under non-U.S. officers)

 

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

Consider the following statements:

  1. The U.S. runs a field training exercise.  U.N. combat troops should be

allowed to serve in U.S. combat units during these exercises under U.S.

command and control.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. The United Nations runs a field training exercise.  U.S. combat troops

under U.S. command and control should serve in U.N. combat units during these

exercises.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. The United Nations runs a field training exercise.  U.S. combat troops

should serve under U.N. command and control in U.N. during these exercises.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions as long as the U.S.

has full command and control.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions under United

Nations command and control.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. U.S. combat troops should be commanded by U.N. officers and non-

commissioned (NCOs) at battalion and company levels while performing U.N.

missions.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. It would make no difference to me to have U.N. soldiers as members of my

team. (e.g. fire team, squad, platoon)

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. It would make no difference to me to take orders from a U.N. company

commander.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I feel the President of the United States has the authority to pass his

responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the U.N. Secretary General.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I feel there is no conflict between my oath of office and serving as a

U.N. soldier.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I feel my unit’s combat effectiveness would not be affected by performing

humanitarian missions for the United Nations.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I feel a designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should be permanently

assigned to the command and control of the United Nations.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I would be willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S. combat unit under

a U.N. commander.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I would like U.N. member countries, including the U.S., to the U.N. all

the soldiers necessary to maintain world peace. 

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. I would swear to the following code:

      “I am a United Nations fighting person.  I serve in the forces which

maintain world peace and every nation’s way of life.  I am prepared to give my

life in their defense.”

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

 

  1. The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale,

transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms.  A thirty (30) day

amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over the local

authorities.  At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to

turn over their firearms.  Consider the following statement:

 

      I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of

firearms banned by the U.S. government.

      (   )          (   )   (   )        (   )       (   ) 

Strongly disagree  Disagree  Agree  Strongly agree  No opinion

End Note

Our civilian readers maybe wondering why the Combat Arms Survey was circulated so heavily within the Department of the Navy. The reason is simple; the Navy is not subject to USC Title 10 Posse Comitatus prohibitions against using federal military forces for domestic law enforcement. This includes the US Marine Corps.

Just thought you would like to know.

THE STAFF[Resistor, Ed.] 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Just more evidence of how effective government controlled education really is. As for me, I would shoot any commander that ordered me to kill Americans if they refused to surrender their lawfully owned weapons. THE UNITED COMMUNIST STATES OF AMERICA is not my country or government. The politicians who have merged America with the U.N. should be hung by the ankles and stoned until they die.

10 13 11 flagbar

UN urges global move to meat and dairy free diet

May 3rd, 2016 by

https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/05/03/flashback-un-calls-global-move-meat-dairy-free-diet/

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/02/un-report-meat-free-diet

5-3-2016 9-45-48 AM

By Felicity Carus

Lesser consumption of animal products is necessary to save the world from the worst impacts of climate change, UN report says

An cattle ranch in Mato Grosso, Brazil. The UN says agriculture is on a par with fossil fuel consumption because both rise rapidly with increased economic growth. Photograph: Daniel Beltra/Greenpeace.

5-3-2016 9-44-47 AM

A global shift towards a vegan diet is vital to save the world from hunger, fuel poverty and the worst impacts of climate change, a UN report said today.

As the global population surges towards a predicted 9.1 billion people by 2050, western tastes for diets rich in meat and dairy products are unsustainable, says the report from United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) international panel of sustainable resource management.

It says: “Impacts from agriculture are expected to increase substantially due to population growth increasing consumption of animal products. Unlike fossil fuels, it is difficult to look for alternatives: people have to eat. A substantial reduction of impacts would only be possible with a substantial worldwide diet change, away from animal products.”

Professor Edgar Hertwich, the lead author of the report, said: “Animal products cause more damage than [producing] construction minerals such as sand or cement, plastics or metals. Biomass and crops for animals are as damaging as [burning] fossil fuels.”

The recommendation follows advice last year that a vegetarian diet was better for the planet from Lord Nicholas Stern, former adviser to the Labour government on the economics of climate change. Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has also urged people to observe one meat-free day a week to curb carbon emissions.

The panel of experts ranked products, resources, economic activities and transport according to their environmental impacts. Agriculture was on a par with fossil fuel consumption because both rise rapidly with increased economic growth, they said.

5-3-2016 9-45-06 AM

Ernst von Weizsaecker, an environmental scientist who co-chaired the panel, said: “Rising affluence is triggering a shift in diets towards meat and dairy products – livestock now consumes much of the world’s crops and by inference a great deal of freshwater, fertilisers and pesticides.”

Both energy and agriculture need to be “decoupled” from economic growth because environmental impacts rise roughly 80% with a doubling of income, the report found.

Achim Steiner, the UN under-secretary general and executive director of the UNEP, said: “Decoupling growth from environmental degradation is the number one challenge facing governments in a world of rising numbers of people, rising incomes, rising consumption demands and the persistent challenge of poverty alleviation.”

The panel, which drew on numerous studies including the Millennium ecosystem assessment, cites the following pressures on the environment as priorities for governments around the world: climate change, habitat change, wasteful use of nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilisers, over-exploitation of fisheries, forests and other resources, invasive species, unsafe drinking water and sanitation, lead exposure, urban air pollution and occupational exposure to particulate matter.

Agriculture, particularly meat and dairy products, accounts for 70% of global freshwater consumption, 38% of the total land use and 19% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, says the report, which has been launched to coincide with UN World Environment day on Saturday.

Last year the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation said that food production would have to increase globally by 70% by 2050 to feed the world’s surging population. The panel says that efficiency gains in agriculture will be overwhelmed by the expected population growth.

Prof Hertwich, who is also the director of the industrial ecology programme at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, said that developing countries – where much of this population growth will take place – must not follow the western world’s pattern of increasing consumption: “Developing countries should not follow our model. But it’s up to us to develop the technologies in, say, renewable energy or irrigation methods.”

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

Please be sure to read the next article about meat replacement.

Do you have any idea how this slop will affect human regeneration?

Are their lies that  much eraser to believe?

10 13 11 flagbar

Which Is The Real American Government?

April 30th, 2016 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/04/which-is-real-american-government.html

Unanswered Letters 2 — Reply to Pat Anderson

12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

by Anna Von Reitz

There has been a LOT of confusion in this process, Pat—- unavoidably so, with the meanings of words being deliberately obscured and many facets of our history buried in reams of the most boring verbiage on Earth.  

But….here is the skinny of it all, as delved out from the public records we have. 

The Forefathers established nation-states in each of the colonies.  Nations are political entities composed of members of Jural Assemblies— unincorporated associations of people who join together for the purpose of defining and enforcing local law— and in our case, that means the Common Law of the land, because our nation-states and our jural assemblies are all land-based and this is the form of law that our Forefathers chose to operate the land jurisdiction.  

States are also political entities “standing for” those nations, created for the purpose of administration of public works and trusteeship of public resources.  So you have the nation, a political entity structured as an unincorporated association of free people acting as a Jural Assembly to define and enforce the law, and you have the state, which is entrusted with providing public services and trusteeship of public property which is owned “in common”. 

The word “state” has another meaning, too, which is the geographic territory in which the members of the state jural assembly lives and over which their authority extends. 

A “county” is similarly structured.  The word can stand for the organization charged with administration of public works and trusteeship of public resources within the boundaries of the geographic territory, or it can mean the literal geographic territory in which the county jural assembly lives and over which their authority extends. 

In the American System, generally speaking, townships make up counties, counties make up states, and the political power vested in these organic states and their living people forming their jural assemblies flows upward—- from the bottom up, not the top down. 

These American nation-states which occupy the land mass of our country are all organized as–literally– separate countries within the “perpetual” Union of States created by The Articles of Confederation (1781).  This is how the nation-states on the land are organized and how they have always been organized.  There has been no change in this basic concept and structure since 1781. 

Contrary to popular misinformation, the adoption of The Constitution(s) nearly a decade later had nothing to do with and did not destroy, amend, or replace The Articles of Confederation nor affect the Union of States created by The Articles of Confederation. 

The Constitution adopted by the States of America just described is called, appropriately enough, “The Constitution for the united States of America”.   

A “constitution” is by definition a “debt agreement or contract”, and in this case, it memorialized a contract for services between the States and the new “Federal Government” they organized as means to provide these “services in common” and which acknowledged the debt that the original States incurred as a result.

The States farmed out some of their work to the federal entity they created, and in exchange, those services were standardized within all the participating States.  The agreement resulted in establishing a common defense, a common form of money, a common trade policy, and so on.  ALL of the duties assigned to the new “federal government” were international in nature. The States retained all authority related to their land jurisdiction. Period. 

Please note that the “federal government” created was a voluntary association of independent nation-states and was never a sovereign government at all. 

Once this new association of the States of America was created and adopted–on top of and in addition to and not in any way competing with the Union of States created by The Articles of Confederation— the service contract became operative and the “federal government” began providing the mutually agreed-upon  “governmental services” the associated States contracted to receive and pay for.  

The Federal Government was and is a subcontractor of the States of America.  It has no other business being here, and since we and our States of America created the “Federal Government” we retain the right to amend its service contract, renegotiate its service contract, or terminate its service contract at will. 

As part of its services contract, the Federal Government is required to protect and defend our National Trust, known as the United States Trust.  This is set forth in the Preamble of The Constitution and was further elucidated by the Bill of Rights. 

The organization thus created and popularly known as the Federal Government has no duties related to the land jurisdiction of the United States, except the “Interstate Commerce Clause” provision which exists merely to “regulate” and expedite free trade between the independent nation-states in the same way that the Federal Government is supposed to regulate and expedite American free trade with and among all the other nations of the world. 

Please note that because the Federal Government’s duties are all international in nature, it functions naturally in the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the Law of the Sea—–not the Law of the Land.  The only form of “common law” available to the Federal Government is international Martial Common Law.  When federal officials and agencies refer to The Constitution as the “Law of the Land” they mean that literally, as in the foreign law of our separate and natural jurisdiction on the land—- it’s our Law that they have to respect when they come ashore on our soil. Please also note that the Federal Jurisdiction created by The Constitution is operated from the top down, not from the bottom up.  It depends on executive power being exercised to direct all of its activities. 

What has occurred here has been a gradual usurpation by the Federal Government which is now operated via two huge international “governmental services corporations” —- THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. fronted by the FEDERAL RESERVE, INC. and the UNITED STATES, INC., fronted by the IMF.  

Various semantic deceits based on similar or even identical names being used to promote fraud against the States of America and the American People have been employed by these corporations and their managers. Chief among these frauds have been the creation of “federated states, counties, and municipalities”. 

The two giant federal service corporations made a successful bid to co-opt the organizations that were providing us with State and County level services.  They promised the State and County organizations a cut of “federal revenue sharing” in exchange for all of them incorporating as franchises—- like Dairy Queen franchises.  This was done as a “private business deal” without public announcement or permission or plebiscite, and it has had profound adverse results. 

The Checks and Balances upon which our lawful government depends have been eradicated.  Instead of the “State” and “County” organizations representing the interests of the States of America and the American People, they have been commandeered to represent the interests of the parent “federal” corporations instead.  This has been done via the simple act of incorporating.  

Whenever you incorporate anything, you take it straight off the jurisdiction of the land and out from under the Law of the Land and set sail in the international jurisdiction of the sea.  This is how our Constitution has been side-stepped by these organizations and the way that improper fraudulent claims have been exercised against the land and the people of the States of America. 

Now, finally getting to your question, Pat—-  what about all these new organizations running around and claiming to “be” the legitimate government?  We’ve got Tim Turner’s “Republic of the united States of America (RuSA)” and we’ve got Russell Gould’s “Unity States of the World” and we’ve got the French “Neu Republique” and it seems that absolutely everyone has “offered” to stand in for our government, but the fact remains that this is a government of the people, by the people and for the people—- and that means that we actually have to show up and do the work of governing ourselves. 

The last few years have been like that old television show—- “Will the real United States of America please stand up?”

The problem with all the aforementioned groups is that they have all concentrated on seizing power from the criminally mismanaged governmental services corporations instead of concentrating on restoring the lawful government from the ground up.  They all want to walk onto center stage, claim the baton, and continue to repeat the same mistakes with whatever variations. And that doesn’t solve the real problem which is ignorance of who we are and how our government is supposed to work: from the bottom up. 

The fact of the matter is that under international law, each and every birthright American State National IS the government.  We are all nation-states, sovereigns, and a law unto ourselves.  That is the true brilliance of our Forefathers.  As long as we know who we are, we call the shots.  As long as there is even one American left standing to exercise The Constitution against these rats, the Last Man Standing Rule applies.  So, here we are, exercising the Last Man Standing Rule and forcing all this crap to be dug out from under the rug and dealt with once and for all. 

Last November we entered a national crisis with hardly anyone being aware of it.  Having failed to establish “exclusive legislative rule” and having no excuse for their fraudulent claims and criminal activities on our shores, the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES, Inc. let the governmental services corporation go insolvent and prepared to liquidate its assets.  They did this without naming any Successor to contract.  That led to the “federal side” of The Constitution being “vacated” for the first time in over 200 years.  

They actually thought that they could pull this off.  They thought they could come in here and “pull an FDR” and claim all the land and assets of the States of America  and the American People as payment for their private corporate debts. They thought they could “dispense with” the actual Constitution and its guarantees and come in here and rape and pillage at will.  The banks were in full hue and cry.  Their operatives claimed before the UN Security Council and the UN Trust Committees that we no longer exist, that we no longer had “international representation”, that we had no “national currency in circulation”.  

The banks meant to kill our nation, void our Constitution, and seize our “abandoned” assets to enrich themselves.  

So, we formed a new contract agreement with the Native American Nations to represent the States of America and the American People in fulfillment of The Constitution for the united States of America.  We issued new Sovereign Letters Patent in rebuttal of the banks and we issued a new Declaration of Joint Sovereignty.  

That instantly put the resources and people of the Indigenous Nations on the playing board and on our side.  These nations, the Athabascan Nation and the Lakota Nation, are recognized internationally, are members of the United Nations, have more than 15 million members, are competent to fulfill the “federal” side of The Constitution contract, and have agreed to do so.  

For the first time in more than three centuries, the American People as a whole have the opportunity to stand together and rule their own destiny on the land and on the sea.  We stuck our fingers in the dyke, but it is up to everyone to now work to repair our lawful government and expose the fraud and mismanagement and breach of trust that landed our country in this situation. 

All of this is heading toward an inevitable national plebiscite in which the facts are all finally disclosed to everyone and in which each one of us decides the fate of our nation.  Meantime, the necessary work of restoring the lawful government on the land has begun.  In every corner, township and county, Jural Assemblies are forming and the county level governments owed to the land jurisdiction are booting up. 

This, finally, is our government coming from the bottom up, the government of the people, by the people and for the people.  This is profoundly not an insurrection.  It’s a restoration.  

What about the “STATE” and “COUNTY” governments presently operating as franchises of these huge multi-national banking cartels?  There’s no need to fight with them.  They are just franchises like Dairy Queen franchises of an insolvent parent corporation on one hand (UNITED STATES, Inc.) and another governmental services corporation (THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Inc.) that doesn’t have a valid contract on the other.  

Are we supposed to fight with Dairy Queen?  Over what?  New flavors of ice cream? 

No, all that is necessary is that Americans wake up and remember who they are, and start operating their own government the way their government is supposed to work: unincorporated States and Counties operating the land jurisdiction of this nation as a check and a balance against the incorporated Federal Government charged with operations in the international jurisdiction of the sea. 

As part of this process we will have the opportunity to call a Continental Congress and review The Contract.  We now know, for example, that allowing the United States Congress to have plenary control of the District of Columbia was a mistake. There are several such “holes” in The Constitution that need plugging. Ultimately, the People and their States of America may see fit to amend, rewrite, restructure, or even destroy the existing Constitution in favor of a new consolidated structure that better protects and enunciates the sacredness of each Man and Woman and which provides less leeway for public employees to go astray. 

 

Whatever happens, I know this much: the American People are now awake and thinking about all this like never before, and that process is not likely to reverse.  God bless America. 


Calling Out John Daresh and NLA Round Two

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/04/calling-out-john-daresh-and-nla-round.html

by Anna Von Reitz

Today, I will address Daresh’s “Information”— which should rightly be titled, “Disinformation” issued a couple days ago.   I quote:

Daresh:   “This brings us to the main purpose of this Information: Government agent provocateurs have been fueling a quasi-shadow government movement that essentially advocates the overthrow of the government.”

Anna:  What government?  A corporation run by international banking cartels is not our government, is it?  In fact, a corporation doesn’t actually have the capacity to act as a sovereign government at all and we are merely stretching euphemism beyond its limit to pretend that it does.

Daresh:  People in this movement, led by de facto Judge Anna Von Reitz, de facto Judge Bruce Doucette and de facto god-graced Administrator Joaquin Folch, who have taken on these self-appointed titles, are duping people from the liberty movements looking for a solution to the subversion within our government who, being ignorant of the law, fall prey to the Pied Pipers .

Anna:  There are no “self-appointed titles” involved including “Pied Piper” and nothing “de facto” about it. Everything we’ve done is firmly based on existing Law.   We are filling vacated public offices that are owed to our own de jure government.  When we offered to show Daresh the facts, he wouldn’t look.  His response was rump in the air, head in the sand.  So there he sits, ignorant as ever, making irresponsible accusations.  NLA deserves far, far better leadership, thank you.

Read the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) for yourselves and then read my explanation of how all this happened in the “Common Law vs. Admiralty Law” article posted at www.annavonreitz.com.   

Daresh:  Many who are following these de facto judges, actually believe them to be properly elected or appointed.

Anna:  We are properly elected Common Law Judges but Daresh mistakenly thinks that we are “supposed to be” Admiralty Judges instead.  He expected me to be a Bar Attorney—-that’s how far behind the curve he really is.  “Oh, look, Dick, there’s a squirrel…..no, Jane, it’s a cat with a fluffy tail….”  

Daresh:  Even we thought for a while that Anna Von Reitz was an Alaskan Supreme Court Judge. We spent many months attempting to verify whether she was even a real person.

 Anna:  Hahahahahahah!  I have been here in the same spot since 1992 as thousands of people who have contacted me directly and honestly can confirm.  The key words here are “honestly and directly”.  

I sent Daresh an original wet-ink copy of our American Affidavit of Probable Cause complete with all my contact information last July and I have the mailing receipts to prove it.   Did he call me?  No.  Did he email me?  No.  Did he write me a letter?  No.  Ask me any questions? No.   

Let’s just say all those “months” they tried so hard to “verify” my existence could have been settled with a phone call and weren’t.  Daresh wasn’t looking for me.  He was trying to avoid me and to avoid taking action on our affidavit. 

Daresh:  But, when she finally surfaced……

Anna:  Yeah, right, as if I was hiding.  That’s why I issue all my documents, books, articles, everything, with current contact information?    

 Daresh:  …..We saw that she was connected to this quasi-shadow government movement that we have been hearing about; but we had yet to identify the people who are part of this movement until now. We believe the leaders of this movement are fueled by government agent provocateurs.

Anna:  Daresh is so clueless that he appears not to know what the “shadow government” is or what the phrase means—- let me enlighten him (and everyone else who needs to know). The Shadow Government was put in place by FDR many long years ago.  It refers to all the appointed offices and agencies that have been promulgating their own rules —like the FBI and FEMA and IRS and DHS— and then left to run rampant over the people who pay their wages. 

This “government by political appointment” is the “Shadow Government” — as defined by those who first coined the term back in the 1930’s and 40’s. —-and not coincidentally, it was the “Shadow Government” that murdered LaVoy Finicum.

All those so senselessly and groundlessly accused—myself, Judge Doucette, and the others— not only support the Common Law Grand Jury Movement, we are committed to restoring the entire American Common Law Court System.

Anyone who supports the resurrection of the Common Law Grand Juries ought to, as a matter of logic and principle, also support the restoration of the American Common Law Court System that gave the CLGJ’s birth and meaning and enforcement in this country for over 350 years.

But not John Daresh.

He wants to pretend that the restoration of our own Common Law Court System including the Common Law Grand Jury portion of it —-is a plot, an attempt to “overthrow the government”.  What a Logic Failure.  Grade “F”.

There are a number of reasons why our effort to restore our entire court system cannot be construed as any act of “insurrection” or attempt to “overthrow” any government.  

First, there’s the plain fact that we haven’t advocated any such thing.

Second, there’s the fact that no foreign corporation is competent to act as a sovereign government with respect to us and these United States, so the concept of “insurrection” doesn’t apply.  

Third, there’s the fact that just as we are heir to the Common Law Grand Jury we are heir to the entire American Common Law Court System as well.  If we are owed one part of it, we are owed the whole of it.

The many good people associated with NLA who are trying to restore the Common Law Grand Juries don’t deserve “leadership” that tells lies and causes trouble, nor do they need a truncated vision that leaves their Grand Juries spinning their wheels, going nowhere.

The simple fact is that the Grand Juries are meant to be part of the whole American Common Law Court System and without the whole Court functioning in support of their actions, the Grand Juries are about as useless as a windmill on a still day.  They can hand down presentments and informations and writs until they are blue in the face and have nothing to show for their effort but a thank you from John Daresh.

This is what we are trying to tell NLA, and if you stop and think about it, you will realize that what we are telling you is true.

See this article and over 200 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

10 13 11 flagbar

 

DONALD TRUMP AND THE MILITIA

April 20th, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin283.htm

By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
February 20, 2016

NewsWithViews.com

Please understand that I am not a “tub-thumper”, an enthusiast, or an apologist for Donald Trump. But his electrifying emergence on the scene represents a sea-change in American politics far more consequential than his own pyrotechnic personality, bold campaign-style, and receipt of popular enthusiasm suggest. He is, as it were, the surfer who—perhaps by accident, perhaps by insight, but in any event in a timely fashion—has caught the first of the really big waves rolling towards shore. The significant aspect of the present situation is not the surfer, however, but the wave: namely, the upsurge of popular disgust for the “two”-party political vessel in which this country is sailing on a collision-course into the rocks of despair. This first big wave threatens all of the ships riding at anchor in the Establishment’s harbor. So the Establishment needs to throw up a breakwater, in a manner both fast and furious.

As anyone with 20-20 political vision can see, America’s domestic enemies have taken off their velvet gloves to reveal the iron fists underneath, by employing against Trump directly, and America ultimately, the modern Bolshevistic strategy of socio-political destabilization through so-called “non-violent direct action”, “weathermen” tactics, and “color revolutions”—all in line with the old Leninist/Stalinist slogan, “there are no fortresses which Bolsheviks cannot storm”. Please refrain from chiding me that the contemporary Establishment is not, to one degree or another, made up largely of Bolsheviks. The opposite is obviously true. Some are retreaded Trotskyites (who call themselves “neoconservatives”). Others are watered-down Mensheviks (who call themselves “social democrats” or “moderate socialists”). Others are the equivalent of NEP-men (better known here as “corporate socialists”, because they rely on governmental intervention in the economy to guarantee profits for themselves, while offloading losses onto the backs of the general public). And all of them are doctrinaire Leninists, inasmuch as they subscribe to his notion that “[t]he scientific term ‘dictatorship’ means nothing more nor less than authority untrammeled by any laws, absolutely unrestricted by any rules whatever, and based directly on force”. Vladimir I. Lenin, “A Contribution to the History of the Question of the Dictatorship, A Note” [1920], in Collected Works (Moscow, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics: Progress Publishers, 4th English Edition, 1966), Volume 31, at 353. None of these people gives a tinker’s dam for the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution—indeed, they believe themselves to be “untrammeled by any laws”. And all of them enthusiastically promote the present-day global “war on terrorism”, under color of which a para-militarized police-state apparatus, “absolutely unrestricted by any rules whatever, and based directly on force”, is being built up within this country in order to wage a domestic “war of terrorism” against the American people. See my book By Tyranny Out of Necessity: The Bastardy of “Martial Law” for the particulars on this.

If I may base my appreciation of the present situation upon an historical parallel drawn from Germany’s dolorous experience under the Weimar government in the 1920s and 1930s (which is probably familiar to most readers of this commentary), the advent of these bare-knuckled mass assaults on this country amounts to our own home-grown Bolsheviks’ declaration of ein Kampf um die Macht auf Leben und Tod (a struggle for power to the death). They will employ their Rotfrontkämpferbund (Red Front fighters’ league) to try to derail Trump’s nomination, through die Herrschaft des Pöbels auf der Straße (mobocracy in the street). If he is nominated, they will use der Bund to try to deny him election. If he is elected notwithstanding all of their efforts before November, they will then turn der Bund loose to stifle any major reforms which he attempts to put through after his inauguration, whether with or especially without Congress, the Judiciary, and the bureaucracy behind him. And please spare me the innuendo that, by drawing upon this parallel, I am somehow suggesting that Trump is a modern American “Hitler” figure. Rather, my intuition tells me that Trump is the sort of individual, perhaps rough-hewn but basically honest, who might have saved Germany from Hitlerism, as well as from Bolshevism, had the good Germans who came forward in der Wiederstand (the resistance-movement) after 1933 been more prescient and better organized before then.

One may ask why America’s Bolsheviks have decided to come out of the closet to exhibit their true coloration by unleashing mobocracy in the street, when they can (and surely will) employ every kind of old-fashioned fraud familiar in American politics to steal the election. The answer is that they anticipate their inability to put into practice Stalin’s apperçu that who votes is less important than who counts the votes, and are prudently preparing for the worst possible eventuality—namely, that in these unsettled times even widespread electoral fraud may not deprive Trump of victory if the polling-places are inundated by a true “revolt of the masses”. Moreover, even the most effective techniques of electoral fraud will be useless after the election. No further elections of consequence will be held during the first two years in which Trump holds “the Office of President”. If he cannot be stifled during that period, perhaps “the Trump phenomenon” will prove its worth in successful Presidential actions, and then will demonstrate its longevity and strength in the next elections—with the Bolsheviks suffering defeat after defeat. Between elections, the Bolsheviks will not be able to rely exclusively upon their co-conspirators, fellow travelers, dupes, useful idiots, and assorted fools in Congress, the Judiciary, and the bureaucracy to stand up to Trump. For the righteous anger of legions of patriotic Americans lined up behind him will give all of them pause. To put iron in their cronies’ backbones, the Bolsheviks will need to provide them with muscle in the streets: namely, hordes of well-funded, well-drilled “protesters” and “dissenters” deployed to shout down, or violently shut down, every popular manifestation of support for Trump.

So, as President, Trump—and all of the patriotic Americans in his camp—will desperately need the Militia:

(i) to awaken, energize, authorize, mobilize, organize, equip, train, and deploy on his behalf those whom the Declaration of Independence styles “the good People”;

(ii) to protect Trump himself—because no part of the present governmental apparatus at any level of the federal system can be trusted to do so;
(iii) to put through fundamental reforms that can be accomplished by the President alone (“to execute the Laws of the Union”, including both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, perforce of Article I, § 8, cl. 15 and such statutes as 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f); 10 U.S.C. §§ 332 and 333; and 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242), in particular against entrenched, recalcitrant, hostile, and disloyal bureaucrats and subversive private factions and other NGOs and special-interest groups; and especially
(iv) to leave puissant governmental institutions for “the good People” to use on their own at the State and Local levels in the event of an unavoidable and utterly destabilizing national crisis, probably centered in banking and haute finance, which breaks out during his Presidency.

With respect to points (ii) and (iii) in particular, one might recall the wisdom of General William Tecumseh Sherman who, when importuned to make himself a candidate for the White House, replied that “I would account myself a fool, a madman, an ass, to embark anew, at sixty-five years of age, in a career that may, at any moment, become tempest-tossed by the perfidy, the defalcation, the dishonesty or neglect of any of a hundred thousand subordinates utterly unknown to the President of the United States.” Quoted in Burke Davis, Sherman’s March (New York, New York: Vantage Books, 1988), at 298.

Inasmuch as der Rotfrontkämpferbund is now being deployed, a counterrevolutionary “white” force must be mobilized to oppose and defeat it. If loyal Americans want to avoid witnessing the rise of some extreme “right-wing” (actually, “right-socialistic”) “brown” force such as die Sturmabteilung (by default the main counterweight to the Communist street-gangs in Weimar Germany during her time of troubles)—which many desperate Americans will demand, and not a few will surely join, if they are offered no other powerful alternative—something else must be provided for them. This force must be raised from among “the good People”, there being no other source with the necessary loyalty, legal authority, self-interest, and sheer numbers requisite for the task at hand. Especially, it must be a force with explicit and unequivocal authority under the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, an establishment within the government, not a force the provenance of which can be traced only to some private political party, movement, or group.

Therefore, if Trump actually intends to be a constitutional “Commander in Chief” in the fullest sense in both law and fact—and, Heaven knows, if he does not intend as much then he should emulate General Sherman by not seeking “the Office of President” at all—he needs to promote the exercise of that high authority against America’s domestic enemies, through exhortation for and mobilization of what the Constitution itself declares to be uniquely “necessary to the security of a free State”, and to which it explicitly assigns the authority and responsibility “to execute the Laws of the Union”—and he must do this, in both words and deeds, immediately if not sooner. This is no time to play for time; for, as the old saying has it, time brings all things, bad as well as good. During his campaign, he must advocate revitalization of the Militia; and, after his election, he must take every action necessary and proper to that end. I suspect that, if he does grasp that nettle, he will be able to say of the contemporary Establishment what General Sherman said of the old Confederacy: “pierce the shell, and it’s all hollow inside”.

On the other hand, if—Heaven forfend!—Hillary Clinton should seize “the Office of President”, either by her own devices or (more likely) with the aid of anti-Trump back-stabbers in the Republican Party or some third-party “spoiler” candidate (from such as the Libertarian Party, which disastrously split the conservative vote in favor of a dyed-in-the-wool Clintonite in the last gubernatorial election in Virginia), she and the Bolsheviks behind her will not sit on their hands. Instead, emboldened by their triumph in scotching Trump, they will turn out der Rotfrontkämpferbund to advance their revolutionary agenda by deploying das Faustrecht (mob rule by the fist) against all of the “constitutionalist”, “patriotic”, “conservative”, “traditionalist”, and other politically, economically, and culturally “right-wing” groups in the country: First, to intimidate them and anyone who even tangentially supports them. Second, to turn the undecided citizenry against them when they try to defend themselves (denouncing even their verbal self-defense as “incitement to violence”). And third, to unleash para-militarized police-state oppression, some species of “martial law” jury-rigged under color of “emergency powers”, Vyshinsky-type prosecutors, and the kangaroo courts to suppress whichever Americans try to stand up for their natural and constitutional rights. This, the Bolsheviks expect, will bring about die Endlösung (the final solution) of the problems of popular sovereignty and popular self-government which so vex all totalitarians.

Be forewarned. One need not be a dabbler in the occult to foretell the future in this respect. Neither need one be much of a student of modern history to fear the accuracy in these times of the old adages that “no one learns anything from history other than that no one ever learns anything from history”, and that “we grow too soon old and too late smart”. (Personally, too, I appreciate the wisdom of the observation that “no man is ever taken for a prophet in his own country”. For I have long been struggling to educate Americans about the Militia—and, most recently, about the utter illegality of “martial law”—with about as much success as if I had been trying to sell a twelve-step program in humility and reticence to the Kardashians.)

Nonetheless, I believe that Mao Tse-tung was correct (albeit perhaps only accidentally or hypocritically so) when he wrote that “[t]he people, and the people alone, are the motive force in the making of world history”, that “[t]he masses have boundless creative power”, and that

[a]ll reactionaries are paper tigers. In appearance, the reactionaries are terrifying, but in reality they are not so powerful. From a long-term point of view, it is not the reactionaries but the people who are really powerful.

Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung (Peking, China: Foreign Languages Press, 1966), at 118, 118, and 72. Thus, to turn the Bolsheviks’ own slogan to the purpose of America’s salvation: “There are no fortresses which ‘the good People’ cannot storm.”

In the final analysis, it is critically important that Trump should turn to “the good People”, trust “the good People”, empower “the good People”, and rely upon “the good People”. Not only for his own sake (which in the great scheme of things amounts to little), but also for their sake first and foremost (which amounts to everything). As modern Presidential campaigns illustrate, this country is steeped in its own bastard version of das Führerprinzip (the leader principle). As early as 1933, America had her “Chief” (Roosevelt), just as Germany had her Führer (Hitler), Italy her Duce (Mussolini), and Russia her Vozhd’ (Stalin), to be followed not long afterwards by Red China with her “Great Helmsman” (Mao). Today, all too many Americans view a President as someone whose purpose is to advance the agenda of their political party or special-interest group, not someone who should act unselfishly with and through WE THE PEOPLE so that THE PEOPLE themselves can become permanently the masters of their own destiny.

Such approval of, or at least acquiescence in, rule from “the top down” must in short order prove fatal to popular self-government. In principle, it denies the precept of the Declaration that “Governments * * * instituted among Men derive their just powers from the consent of the governed”—not from acceptance by “the governed” of “the leader’s” mere assertions of authority. In practice, it generates increasingly uncritical support for “the leader’s” program, then increasingly blind obedience to his dictates. Until society arrives at the terminal stage of suicidal political regimentation: Führer befehl, wir folgen (leader command, we follow).

Just as the strength of any pyramid resides at its base, not at its apex, so, too, with popular sovereignty—and with the Power of the Sword in WE THE PEOPLE’S hands for the purpose of “execut[ing] the Laws of the Union” through the Militia. In a constitutional republic, true authority and legitimate power never descend from “the top down”, but always arise—indeed, can be generated and exercised only—from “the bottom up”. Trump’s greatest achievement (were he capable of any truly great achievement) would be to put this truth into action. By one segment of the population he will be damned if he does; and, by another segment, damned if he does not; so he may as well be taken for a goat rather than a sheep. That goes for the rest of us, too.

© 2016 Edwin Vieira, Jr. – All Rights Reserved


 

Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School).

For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.

He has written numerous monographs and articles in scholarly journals, and lectured throughout the county. His most recent work on money and banking is the two-volume Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution (2002), the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective. www.piecesofeight.us

He is also the co-author (under a nom de plume) of the political novel CRA$HMAKER: A Federal Affaire (2000), a not-so-fictional story of an engineered crash of the Federal Reserve System, and the political upheaval it causes. www.crashmaker.com

His latest book is: “How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary” … and Constitutional “Homeland Security,” Volume One, The Nation in Arms…

He can be reached at his new address:
52 Stonegate Court
Front Royal, VA 22630.

E-Mail: Not available

 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

 

It is exceedingly depressing that so many otherwise intelligent citizens have entered this election circus with renewed hope that a savior is in the race. I would bet all of my Children, Grand Children, and Great Grand Children’s lives that every single person running for President is under the thumb of the Banking Cartel. For those poor souls who still believe they are electing anyone, shame on you! The evidence that America is an oligarchy made-up of International Bankers, and the people have no power to elect a garbage pickup crew is the only sure bet in this Nation of beguiled fools. There is one, and only one way for America to elect their own leaders and Mr. Vieira has laid it all out above. If America does not have the guts to form a Constitutional Militia it is a Nation of fools, because that is the only way this Cluster F#$k will be fixed. Not in a day, and not in a year, but slowly like grass growing in summer; power will be transferred to the people.

10 13 11 flagbar

 

Saint or Sinner Government Eyes Are Watching Every Move You Make

April 19th, 2016 by

Saint or Sinner, Government Eyes Are Watching Every Move You Make

By John W. Whitehead
April 18, 2016

This commentary is also
available at www.rutherford.org.

“The way things are supposed to work is that we’re supposed to know virtually everything about what [government officials] do: that’s why they’re called public servants. They’re supposed to know virtually nothing about what we do: that’s why we’re called private individuals. This dynamic – the hallmark of a healthy and free society – has been radically reversed. Now, they know everything about what we do, and are constantly building systems to know more. Meanwhile, we know less and less about what they do, as they build walls of secrecy behind which they function. That’s the imbalance that needs to come to an end. No democracy can be healthy and functional if the most consequential acts of those who wield political power are completely unknown to those to whom they are supposed to be accountable.” ― Glenn Greenwald

Government eyes are watching you.

They see your every move: what you read, how much you spend, where you go, with whom you interact, when you wake up in the morning, what you’re watching on television and reading on the internet.

Every move you make is being monitored, mined for data, crunched, and tabulated in order to form a picture of who you are, what makes you tick, and how best to control you when and if it becomes necessary to bring you in line.

Simply by liking or sharing this article on Facebook or retweeting it on Twitter, you’re most likely flagging yourself as a potential renegade, revolutionary or anti-government extremist—a.k.a. terrorist.

Yet whether or not you like or share this particular article, simply by reading it or any other articles related to government wrongdoing, surveillance, police misconduct or civil liberties is enough to get you categorized as a particular kind of person with particular kinds of interests that reflect a particular kind of mindset that might just lead you to engage in a particular kinds of activities.

Chances are, as the Washington Post reports, you have already been assigned a color-coded threat score—green, yellow or red—so police are forewarned about your potential inclination to be a troublemaker depending on whether you’ve had a career in the military, posted a comment perceived as threatening on Facebook, suffer from a particular medical condition, or know someone who knows someone who might have committed a crime.

In other words, you might already be flagged as potentially anti-government in a government database somewhere—Main Core, for example—that identifies and tracks individuals who aren’t inclined to march in lockstep to the police state’s dictates.

The government has the know-how.

As The Intercept recently reported, the FBI, CIA, NSA and other government agencies are increasingly investing in and relying on corporate surveillance technologies that can mine constitutionally protected speech on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram in order to identify potential extremists and predict who might engage in future acts of anti-government behavior.

Now all it needs is the data, which more than 90% of young adults and 65% of American adults are happy to provide.

When the government sees all and knows all and has an abundance of laws to render even the most seemingly upstanding citizen a criminal and lawbreaker, then the old adage that you’ve got nothing to worry about if you’ve got nothing to hide no longer applies.

Apart from the obvious dangers posed by a government that feels justified and empowered to spy on its people and use its ever-expanding arsenal of weapons and technology to monitor and control them, we’re approaching a time in which we will be forced to choose between obeying the dictates of the government—i.e., the law, or whatever a government official deems the law to be—and maintaining our individuality, integrity and independence.

When people talk about privacy, they mistakenly assume it protects only that which is hidden behind a wall or under one’s clothing. The courts have fostered this misunderstanding with their constantly shifting delineation of what constitutes an “expectation of privacy.” And technology has furthered muddied the waters. However, privacy is so much more than what you do or say behind locked doors. It is a way of living one’s life firm in the belief that you are the master of your life, and barring any immediate danger to another person (which is far different from the carefully crafted threats to national security the government uses to justify its actions), it’s no one’s business what you read, what you say, where you go, whom you spend your time with, and how you spend your money.

Unfortunately, privacy as we once knew it is dead.

George Orwell’s 1984—where “you had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized”—has become our reality.

We now find ourselves in the unenviable position of being monitored, managed and controlled by our technology, which answers not to us but to our government and corporate rulers.

Consider that on any given day, the average American going about his daily business will be monitored, surveilled, spied on and tracked in more than 20 different ways, by both government and corporate eyes and ears. A byproduct of this new age in which we live, whether you’re walking through a store, driving your car, checking email, or talking to friends and family on the phone, you can be sure that some government agency, whether the NSA or some other entity, is listening in and tracking your behavior.

As I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, this doesn’t even begin to touch on the corporate trackers that monitor your purchases, web browsing, Facebook posts and other activities taking place in the cyber sphere.

For example, police have been using Stingray devices mounted on their cruisers to intercept cell phone calls and text messages without court-issued search warrants.

Doppler radar devices, which can detect human breathing and movement within in a home, are already being employed by the police to deliver arrest warrants and are being challenged in court.

License plate readers, yet another law enforcement spying device made possible through funding by the Department of Homeland Security, can record up to 1800 license plates per minute. Moreover, these surveillance cameras can also photograph those inside a moving car. Reports indicate that the Drug Enforcement Administration has been using the cameras in conjunction with facial recognition software to build a “vehicle surveillance database” of the nation’s cars, drivers and passengers.

Sidewalk and “public space” cameras, sold to gullible communities as a sure-fire means of fighting crime, is yet another DHS program that is blanketing small and large towns alike with government-funded and monitored surveillance cameras. It’s all part of a public-private partnership that gives government officials access to all manner of surveillance cameras, on sidewalks, on buildings, on buses, even those installed on private property.

Couple these surveillance cameras with facial recognition and behavior-sensing technology and you have the makings of “pre-crime” cameras, which scan your mannerisms, compare you to pre-set parameters for “normal” behavior, and alert the police if you trigger any computerized alarms as being “suspicious.”

State and federal law enforcement agencies are pushing to expand their biometric and DNA databases by requiring that anyone accused of a misdemeanor have their DNA collected and catalogued. However, technology is already available that allows the government to collect biometrics such as fingerprints from a distance, without a person’s cooperation or knowledge. One system can actually scan and identify a fingerprint from nearly 20 feet away.

Developers are hard at work on a radar gun that can actually show if you or someone in your car is texting. Another technology being developed, dubbed a “textalyzer” device, would allow police to determine whether someone was driving while distracted. Refusing to submit one’s phone to testing could result in a suspended or revoked driver’s license.

It’s a sure bet that anything the government welcomes (and funds) too enthusiastically is bound to be a Trojan horse full of nasty, invasive surprises. Case in point: police body cameras. Hailed as the easy fix solution to police abuses, these body cameras—made possible by funding from the Department of Justice—will turn police officers into roving surveillance cameras. Of course, if you try to request access to that footage, you’ll find yourself being led a merry and costly chase through miles of red tape, bureaucratic footmen and unhelpful courts.

The “internet of things” refers to the growing number of “smart” appliances and electronic devices now connected to the internet and capable of interacting with each other and being controlled remotely. These range from thermostats and coffee makers to cars and TVs. Of course, there’s a price to pay for such easy control and access. That price amounts to relinquishing ultimate control of and access to your home to the government and its corporate partners. For example, while Samsung’s Smart TVs are capable of “listening” to what you say, thereby allowing users to control the TV using voice commands, it also records everything you say and relays it to a third party, e.g., the government.

Then again, the government doesn’t really need to spy on you using your smart TV when the FBI can remotely activate the microphone on your cellphone and record your conversations. The FBI can also do the same thing to laptop computers without the owner knowing any better.

Drones, which are taking to the skies en masse, are the converging point for all of the weapons and technology already available to law enforcement agencies. In fact, drones that can listen in on your phone calls, see through the walls of your home, scan your biometrics, photograph you and track your movements, and even corral you with sophisticated weaponry.

Technology has upped the stakes dramatically.

All of these technologies add up to a society in which there’s little room for indiscretions, imperfections, or acts of independence—especially not when the government can listen in on your phone calls, monitor your driving habits, track your movements, scrutinize your purchases and peer through the walls of your home.

In such an environment, you’re either a paragon of virtue, or you’re a criminal.

This is the creepy, calculating yet diabolical genius of the American police state: the very technology we hailed as revolutionary and liberating has become our prison, jailer, probation officer, Big Brother and Father Knows Best all rolled into one.

Thus, to be an individual today, to not conform, to have even a shred of privacy, and to live beyond the reach of the government’s roaming eyes and technological spies, one must not only be a rebel but rebel.

As Philip K. Dick, the visionary who gave us Minority Report and Blade Runner, advised:

If, as it seems, we are in the process of becoming a totalitarian society in which the state apparatus is all-powerful, the ethics most important for the survival of the true, free, human individual would be: cheat, lie, evade, fake it, be elsewhere, forge documents, build improved electronic gadgets in your garage that’ll outwit the gadgets used by the authorities.

There is no gray area any longer.

10 13 11 flagbar

 

Your Future is at Stake

April 18th, 2016 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/04/your-future-is-at-stake.htmlhttp://www.paulstramer.net/2016/04/your-future-is-at-stake.html

12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

By Anna Von Reitz

Who is Karen Hudes?  An attorney for the World Bank who left employment with them in 2007 but continued to represent herself as a World Bank employee.  This finally resulted in the World Bank bringing suit against her in their efforts to distance themselves from her and the Global Debt Facility. 

Who does she really work for? The Global Debt Facility, sometimes called the World Bank Global Debt Facility.  So you see, Ms. Hudes does, in a sense, work for the World Bank and any pretension otherwise on either part is just a question of political liability.

Exactly what is a “global debt facility”? 

“A facility that issues debt securities, denominated in both United States dollars and foreign currencies, to investors around the world, using a variety of clearing systems to issue and administrate the securities. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are examples of global debt facilities.”
Ref: http://www.investorwords.com/15422/global_debt_facility.html#ixzz45vKuCPAk

What does this mean?  It means that all the money and credit that Karen Hudes is handing out to people is financed on bonds (as in “bondage” and “bondservant”) that are based on your labor and your public and private assets.

She is spreading your wealth around to keep you enslaved.   Isn’t that nice of her?

Functionally, the Global Debt Facility is a “Drop Box” where the guilty banks can off-load stolen assets and continue to use them and invest them in behalf of “unknown” owners.

You are the unknown owners.  

You are also the Priority Creditors of the United States of America, Inc., the UNITED STATES, INC., and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.

What is really going on?  Two gigantic international banking cartels are staging a “war” with each other for our benefit. One gang of thugs is appearing to push for the continuance of the fiat money system and the other gang of thugs is pushing for a gold-backed system.  They are accusing each other of all sorts of things, but they are actually on the same team and working in collusion with each other.

Ms. Hudes is converting bonds into gold, because debt — your debt, supposedly—-is what the Global Debt Facility holds as assets.  

This is in line with the original plan the Federal Reserve set up in 1913: consolidate ownership of all gold reserves, devalue the fiat currencies through inflation, and then sell the gold back to the grandchildren of the men you stole it from for 4,000-10,000% profit.  This is why FDR confiscated American gold in the 1930’s.  This is what happened in Germany in the 1920’s. 

This artificially manufactured profit is the prize that the bankers, including Ms. Hudes, are after.  That profit can only be achieved by forcing you to pay for it with your labor and your natural resources and that requires forcing you back onto the gold standard.

To the bankers. it doesn’t really matter if the product they are selling is gold or paper.  Gold has little practical use, and isn’t actually valuable.  They just make it seem valuable by making it scarce and cutting it in rounds and stamping an image on it.  Nor, strictly speaking, is it “constitutional”.  If you read the Constitution you will see that the States are the only ones limited to paying their debts in gold or silver coin.  Back in 1789, the federal (that is, international) bankers were on the gold standard and didn’t want to accept any fiat money from the States.  The same thing is happening now for different reasons.

So the ITC/OITC is playing the Good Guy, and Ms. Hudes and the World Bank and the Global Debt Facility are playing the Good Guys also, and we are left in the middle watching them sling lies at each other and at us—- but it is up to us to discern the Truth.

Neither “side” in this drama is operating out of anything but the most venal kind of self-interest and they are in fact nothing but two sides of the same coin.  They are acting in collusion for mutual profit at the expense of the people they are supposed to serve, just like the Democrats and the Republicans.

Several months ago, the people of Switzerland got fed up with it, just like the people of Iceland.  They told their government to clean up the banks.  And now Ms. Hudes is attacking Switzerland.  Go figure.

Anna von Reitz informed Karen Hudes of the Priority Creditor standing of the American People back in July of 2014 in an epic Facebook battle that Karen Hudes lost.   Anna told Ms. Hudes that the Americans are “coming to breakfast” along with all the other people who are in fact owed trillions and who are in fact NOT responsible for the so-called “National Debt”.

For an understanding for why this is true and why you do NOT owe $18 trillion dollars of trumped up odious debt, get a copy of “You Know Something Is Wrong When…..An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”.

And then tell Ms. Hudes to stop spending your money and stop using it to buy off petty crooks and stop promising immunity to her pals in your names.  You are the victims of this scam and she is an attorney acting in behalf of the rats who have defrauded you.  Of course, she wants to give her bosses immunity and she wants you to assume their debts and she wants you to buy whole-hog into their gold-backed currency system.

Just remember that they are selling a product like everyone else and it truly does not matter to them if it is made out of gold or toilet paper.  Also remember that we are the source of all this wealth and that we are perfectly capable of issuing our own currency —as we are supposed to do under the Constitution— all by ourselves.

When you see someone like Karen Hudes suddenly appearing as the leader of NLA and Oathkeepers and the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association —– ask yourselves this question: why?  Could it be that these organizations were funded from the start by the same banks Ms. Hudes works for?  Could it be that she bought some people off?

What does Karen Hudes— an attorney and a foreign bank attorney at that— have anything to do with our Grand Juries?  Our actual Constitution?   Or our Peacekeeping forces?

Ask yourselves— do you really want to be kept down on the farm paying off debts you don’t owe for foreign banks, or do you want them to pay off their own debts?

Do you want your country back and operating as it is supposed to, or are you content to be fed a pack of lies and Free Lunch stories and bribes instead?

Over the past five years Karen Hudes has fed the world a lot of bunko and it is thankfully archived all over YouTube and Google.  Our favorite involves a Fairy Godfather named “Wolfgang Struck” who supposedly held a vast amount of gold that had been sitting gathering dust in the basement of the New York Federal Reserve Bank since the 1930’s.  Ms. Hudes travelled the world telling people how Wolfgang, this wonderful philanthropist, was going to give them all $100,000 in gold just for the asking.

There was just a small detail omitted.  In exchange for the $100,000 in gold, you gave up your claim forever to own your own body, your other public and private assets,  and you also gave up any interest in a much larger fortune you are the lawful heir to.  

That’s who and what Karen Hudes is. 

And now you really need to take the time to find out who Anna von Reitz is and who Bruce Doucette is and who Gary Darby is —and why they are doing what they are doing and under what authority they are acting and most of all— you need to know that they are not arresting “all the Governors” or any other such nonsense as Ms. Hudes has been promoting.

Start researching and acting and thinking for yourselves and don’t trust anyone else to do it for you. Read the sworn public affidavit detailing the history of the crimes that have been committed against you and against your lawful government by the banks Ms. Hudes works for—- “You Know Something Is Wrong When……An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”

And then ask yourself again— how did Karen Hudes suddenly become Dictator in charge of NLA, Oathkeepers, and CSOPA?  

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here: www.annavonreitz.com

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Unfortunately most of you reading this article will consider it a waste of time, but it is really like someone just gave you a suitcase full of gold coins. You see, if you considered this information valuable, you would read more of Anna’s work and realize how you have been robbed of everything you think you own, including your person, and you would devour every word on her site. There is a way to regain your personhood and your sovereign Nation, if only you would spend some time learning how. Now go back to your favorite TV show!

10 13 11 flagbar

The MOST Dangerous Man In America

April 15th, 2016 by

4-15-2016 11-38-11 AM4-15-2016 11-42-42 AM

The most dangerous man in America knows — without any doubt whatsoever — that the U.S. Federal Government executed the false flag terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.  They know that this highly calculated and synthetic form of terrorism was perpetrated to terrorize the American people into supporting a fake War on Terror.  They know that 9/11 was a multi-decade conspiracy (based on Operation Northwoods) that was perpetrated by the NWO ruling cabal as a means to foist a One World Government upon the world community of nations. They actually know this and much more about what truly happened in New York City and Washington, D.C. on that fateful day of profound betrayal and deceit.

9/11: Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel Co-Conspirators

The most dangerous man in America knows — with absolute certainty — that John F. Kennedy was executed by the CIA which was acting on behalf of the International Banking Cartel and Military-Industrial Complex.  They know that Kennedy, at the time, was actually the most dangerous man in America and had to be eliminated if the New World Order (NWO) agenda was to proceed forthwith.  They also know that every U.S. president since JFK has been handpicked by the World Shadow Government and not elected by the American people.

CIA & Company: The Real Plotters Behind JFK’s Assassination

The most dangerous man in America knows that the U.S. electoral process is nothing but a sham whereby the ruling elites choose in advance both candidates every four years.  They know that these pre-selected pawns have been fastidiously vetted so as to be sufficiently assured that the selected ones will never leave the NWO reservation.  They know that both main party candidates will always be considered the lesser of the two evils by their respective constituencies.  In this way the electorate forever experiences the pendulum of presidential politics being swung to greater extremes with each successive election cycle.

Circus Politics: Will Our Freedoms Survive Another Presidential Election?

The most dangerous man in America knows — without a shadow of a doubt — that the Oklahoma City Bombing was a government-coordinated false flag bombing that was designed to greatly diminish the patriot movement that was growing in the wake of the President Bush-sponsored Savings and Loan scandal.  They know that such ‘homegrown’ terrorism in OK City was manufactured by the Clinton Administration in order to reverse the fast-growing trend toward militia formation around the country.  They also know that the anger was clearly brewing then and that the banking elites were determined to quell in advance any threats to their safety.

Oklahoma City Bombing: All Evidence Point To The U.S. Federal Government

The most dangerous man in America knows — with complete assurance — that the 1993 WACO massacre of innocents was also carried out to tar and feather gun owners everywhere so that all firearm-carrying citizens would be looked at as radicals.  They also know that such a conflagration would be forever associated with any type of religious practice that was not patently mainstream.  They know that all forms of unorthodox spiritual pursuit were purposefully linked to the Branch Davidian sect at Waco just as they were to the Jonestown massacre and the Heaven’s Gate cult mass suicide (read slaughter).

WACO: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

The most dangerous man in America knows that the United States of America was socially engineered, with meticulous deliberation, into the “Military Arm of the New World Order” .  They know that every major government initiative that has occurred in the USA over the past 100 years has transformed the political class into a war-mongering gang of jackals.  They know that the steady brainwashing known as American Exceptionalism has imprinted the body politic with an acceptance of the perpetual war economy.

The USA: Military Arm Of The New World Order

The most dangerous man in America knows that the mainstream media (MSM) is nothing but a propaganda organ of the CIA, DIA, NSA, DARPA and other alphabet soup agencies of the rogue U.S. Federal Government.  They know that all the major news- reporting companies are completely controlled by the CIA.  They know that all book publishing, music production, motion picture production and TV programming must be explicitly approved by the CIA.  They also know that not a single movie ever gets released without direct involvement of the extremely secret military office which is oversees National Security issues.

Who REALLY Controls The Mainstream Media?

The most dangerous man in America knows — with unshakable belief — that the Federal Reserve System (FED) was established by an international crime syndicate in order to fleece the American people.  They know that a Federal Reserve Note is neither federal, nor held in reserve.  They know that a “Note” is a debt instrument, not a hard asset like an ounce of gold or silver.  They also know that the Federal Reserve Bank is an unlawful banking entity that was established by the unlawful Federal Reserve Act and that it is utterly bankrupt.  They know the FED has usurped the constitutional power of the U.S. Treasury to the great detriment of the American people.

Who Owns The Federal Reserve?

The most dangerous man in America knows — beyond any doubt — that the Internal Revenue Service is nothing but a glorified collection agency that enforces the unlawful IRS tax code with violent tactics and thuggery.  They know that the IRS Commissioners have been unable to point to a single law that permits them to properly collect income tax.  They also know that the IRS is guilty of functioning as a multi-decade protection racket operating in violation of RICO and therefore subject to prosecution under the applicable federal statutes.

The most dangerous man in America knows — with total confidence — that the stock market is nothing but the largest gambling casino on Earth.  They know that all the markets have morphed into a global confidence game where the con men always win the day.  Like Vegas, they know that the house has had the whole game rigged since day one in favor of the ‘smart money’.  They also know that every market — equity and bond, currency and commodity, real estate and insurance, derivative and carbon — are all grossly over-inflated and poised for a bubble burst.

THE BIGGEST BUBBLE EVER IS BURSTING—BIG TIME!

The most dangerous man in America knows — with certitude — that the current stock market frenzy is nothing but a Sucker’s Rally, and perhaps a set up for what may become the greatest sucker’s rally of all time.  They know that the current economic indicators and financial data reflect a coming economic Armageddon and financial Apocalypse.  They also know that it’s NOT going to be pretty for anyone who is still in the game.  Are you?

The BIGGEST Sucker’s Rally of the Millennium

The most dangerous man in America knows — with increasing awareness — that the global chemical geoengineering regime is directly responsible for global climate change. They know that all the fraudulent CO2 data has been fabricated in order to create a new bogeyman with which to scare and stampede the world community of nation into a pen of compliance with U.N. Agenda 21 and obedience toward the dictates of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  They also know that chemtrail aerosols have many chemical compounds and weaponized biologicals which are extremely harmful to Earth’s biota, and are bioengineered to be especially injurious to human life.

U.S. Government Spraying Tons Of Toxic Coal Fly Ash Into Atmosphere Via Chemtrails

The most dangerous man in America knows that the global warming scam was started in the post World War II years after the entire Solar System showed signs of systemic transmutation.  They know that this natural occurrence was the result of forces far outside of the province of mankind.  They also know that the geoengineering regime was then formulated in order to exacerbate the warming trends so that a new Global CO2 Management Regime and Carbon Control Matrix could be imposed on the world community of nations as a precursor to a One World Government.

NWO Cabal Pursues Total Dominion Over The Earth’s Weather And Natural Resources

The most dangerous man in America knows that the nation’s water supplies have been fluoridated for many decades in order to slowly poison the American people.  They know that the specific form of fluoride used is highly toxic and used in rat poison.  They know that repeated exposure to fluoride will calcify the pineal gland and produce many other adverse health conditions and serious medical ailments.  They also know that the consistent ingestion of fluoride will predispose the human brain to a whole host of subliminal programming techniques, particularly those of the TV programming variety.

A Fluoride-Free Pineal Gland Is More Important Than Ever

The most dangerous man in America knows that the extraordinary push to thoroughly “GMO” the world’s food supply is part of a sinister agenda working toward transhumanism.  They know that the real health consequences of GMO foods are many and diverse, as well as incalculable and unknown in many cases.  They know that corporations such as Monsanto were established to manufacture poisonous agents like Agent Orange in order to test them on unsuspecting populations around the globe.

Respected Analyst Says GMOs Could Destroy Life on the Planet

The most dangerous man in America knows that the current super-vaccination agenda is the single greatest threat to the health of the children of the world.  They know that injecting infants and young children with dangerous chemical and biological agents will short-circuit the normal immune response as well as negatively affect immune system development.  They know that vaccines have been used for the deliberate infection of children and have provided a primary vector of spreading certain diseases across the planet. They also know that vaccination programs are routinely chipping children with unknown bioengineered technologies in order to produce specific outcomes.

THE VACCINE CONSPIRACY: U.S. Government Colludes With BIG Pharma To Poison The America People

The most dangerous man in America knows that the world food supply which is being produced by Agribusiness adheres strictly to the chemical agriculture paradigm. They know that untold numbers and amounts of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, chemical fertilizers, antibiotics, bovine growth hormones, etc. are systematically utilized throughout every phase of farming and animal husbandry.  They also know that much food production is taking place in areas which are exposed to nuclear power plant radioactivity, industrial chemical pollution and microwave frequencies.

The most dangerous man in America knows that the whole planet is now swirling in a veritable soup of electro-pollution and microwave frequencies and ionizing radiation. They know that microwave ovens have been destroying cooked foods for decades and that microwave towers are disseminating dangerous frequencies wherever they exist.  They know that every nuclear power plant is in the state of its own type of accelerating technospheric breakdown and that society is now exposed to many vectors of radioactivity which are inexorably causing a mutation of the human species.  They especially know that smart and cell phone mania are slowly destroying the brains of the users.

Microwave Ovens: Remove Them From Your Kitchens … NOW!

The most dangerous man in America knows that the entire world has been owned and operated by Corporate America, a division of Anglo-American Corporate, Inc. which is in turn a subsidiary of the Vatican, INC.  They know that the Global Economic and Financial System provides the superstructure by which the masses of the world are held in a debt prison.  They also know that the banking and investment banking companies are tasked with the administration of an oppressive system of usury and debt slavery which keeps countless residents of the planet in the state of lifelong servitude.

The Government-Corporate Complex Takes Complete Control Of The USA

The most dangerous man in America knows that the national security state (NSS) that has been painstakingly established since the U.S.  Government-sponsored  9/11 terror attacks was not conceived to protect Americans from its enemies.  They know that the NSS was implemented with all deliberate speed to protect the plutocratic ruling elites and kleptocratic political class from the citizenry.  The NWO cabal knew that, sooner or later, the American people would become aware that all terror is synthesized for the purpose of controlling them, the populace.  They also knew that, when that day of reckoning occurred, all hell would break loose French Revolution-style.

SERCO: Foreign Outsourcing Giant Takes Over the US National Security State

The most dangerous man in America knows that the current U.S. President and Vice President were fraudulently elected as were the previous Republican POTUS and VPOTUS.  They know full well that Barack Obama is an imposter who possesses no legitimate birth certificate. They also know that the present administration was installed to restart the Cold War with Russia, take over the Middle East via the engineered Arab Spring and ISIS terrorism, as well as incite the Ukraine civil war. They also know that Obama was handpicked to establish Obamacare and, most importantly, to remove the Second Amendment from the Bill of Rights.  They are especially aware that Obama has effectively dissolved U.S. sovereignty by way of the advancement of the TPP and TPIP via his prior approval of TPA.

The Obamanation: How One President Irreparably Destroyed The USA

The most dangerous man in America knows that the current war refugee crisis in the Middle East and European economic migrant calamity were engineered in the capitals of the Anglo-American Axis*.  They know that the American immigration crisis and border collapse was manufactured in Washington, D.C. as well as in corporate boardrooms across the USA.  They know that these and other other social engineering cataclysms are specifically designed to destroy national boundaries worldwide.  They also know that the rampant false flag terrorism is perpetrated everywhere in order to greatly increase global security concerns so that a New World Order may be imposed and then administered by a One World Government.

STRATFOR Chief Reveals Zio-Anglo-American Plot For World Domination

The most dangerous man in America knows that vast majority of human beings are hopelessly addicted to deception. They know that this is the primary reason for the bleak state of the world.  They are acutely aware that the addiction to deception is, in fact, the primordial deception invariably found at the roots of all the other addictions. They know that, as long as the masses are slaves to this particular addiction and therefore to the many other well-known addictions which plague humankind, the challenge of transforming the planetary civilization into an enlightened and peaceful one remains exceedingly elusive and quite daunting.

Are The Markets HOPELESSLY Addicted to Deception?

Now YOU know why YOU are “The most dangerous man or woman in America”.

The upshot of this discussion is that when the American people really do wake up, the “military arm of the NWO” will collapse in a day and a night.  Then, there is no one nation or other entity to enforce the global tyranny that has relentlessly terrorized the planet for so many centuries, and even over millennia.

This is why YOU are “The most dangerous man or woman in America”!

Let’s get busy … … … creating many other “dangerous men and women in America”.

State of the Nation

10 13 11 flagbar

MEN IN DARK SUITS BLUE SMOKE AND BACKROOM DEALS

April 13th, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ewart/ron247.htm

4-13-2016 8-02-09 AM

By Ron Ewart
April 13, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

NOTE: The following article was designed to be Part 2 to our last article entitled “An ‘Establishment’ Always Evolves Into An All-Powerful Oligarchy.”

I had a dream the other night. I dreamt that, as a well-known writer, (I said it was a dream) I was invited to one of the secret meetings of the Bilderberg Group, (or Bilderberg Club as they are sometimes called)

In my rather vivid dream, as I was about to take my seat at the conference table where the future of the world was to be discussed, a very official looking fellow with white gloves came up to me and shoved an envelope in my hand. I started to open the envelope as I sat down. As I unfolded the paper, the heading at the top, in big bold, gold letters, read: “The Bilderberg Club”. The letter started out:

Dear Mr. Ewart:

“As you know, this group meets in secret every year. What is discussed here must never leave this room. Should you decide to publicly report on anything that takes place here, you will be discredited from the highest level of government, business and banking. Your books, articles and essays will be black listed in every single venue, worldwide, your family will be hounded, you will never be able to open a bank account or borrow money again and your life will be in constant danger for as long as you live.”

“As strict as these covenants are, we sincerely hope that your attending this conference will be enlightening and we wish to extend to you every courtesy. We trust your experience will be a memorable event in your life.”

Sincerely,

Bla-Bla-Bla,

A memorable event, indeed! I wondered in my dream, could they have this much power? Probably!

I suddenly awoke from the dream in a sweat and started to think about these events. Why would central bankers, defense experts, mass-media press barons, government ministers, prime ministers, royalty, international financiers and political leaders from Europe and North America want to meet in the first place? Why in secret? What would they be discussing?

It turns out that there are highly suspicious connections between these types of groups, like the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and the Council on Foreign Relations. They have overlapping memberships and similar goals. Two of the groups, the Bilderberg and Council on Foreign Relations, have very strong ties to the Rockefeller Family. Remember. There was another secret meeting of the titans of finance and industry that met on Jekyll Island in 1907 that became the catalyst for the 16th Amendment (1913), ushering in the Federal Reserve and the Internal Revenue Service. The incestuous relationships in the banking industry, specifically Chase Bank and Goldman Sachs, is well documented. David D. Rockefeller, now over 100 years old, was chairman of J P. Morgan Chase Bank for many years. J. P. Morgan was so rich he helped bail out the U. S. Government in the crash of 1895.

NOTE: During Hoover’s Administration, at the request of the President, the Rockefeller Foundation funded a study by the University of Illinois and Harvard University on how to manipulate people through their subconscious minds. Why would government do this in a free nation?

THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Towards the end of World War I, a working fellowship of about 150 scholars called “The Inquiry” was tasked to brief President Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar world when Germany was defeated. This academic band, including Wilson’s closest adviser and long-time friend “Colonel” Edward M. House, as well as noted journalist Walter Lippmann, met to assemble the strategy for the postwar world. “The Inquiry” group later became the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In the late 1930s, the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation began contributing large amounts of money to the Council on Foreign Relations. CFR’s impact on U. S. foreign policy, for right or wrong, is legendary and has been and still is, almost immeasurable. Thousands of politicians, big-bank CEO’s and captains of industry are members of this elite club.

THE BILDERBER GROUP: The Group is an annual private conference of 120 to 150 people of the European and North American political elite, experts from industry, finance, academia, and the media, established in 1954. The group’s original goal was promoting Atlanticism, strengthening US-European relations and preventing another world war. (Wasn’t the UN supposed to do that?) Their theme is to “bolster a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe”. It all sounds so noble and worthy, except that in 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and, a CFR steering committee member for 30 years, said: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”

Daniel Estulin’s 2006 book The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club, describes the Group as a “sinister clique, manipulating the public to install a world government that knows no borders and is not accountable to anyone but itself.”

THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION: The Trilateral Commission is purported to be a non-governmental, non-partisan discussion group founded by David Rockefeller in July 1973, to foster closer cooperation among North America, Western Europe, and Japan. Zbigniew Brzezinski, United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981, a professor at Columbia University, and a Rockefeller advisor who was a specialist on international affairs, left his post to organize the group.

(Source for the three groups: Wikipedia)

Please take note of the Rockefeller connection in these groups.

We happen to know a little bit about human nature and what We know about men of wealth and power does not bode well for anyone below the top of the food chain. As we mentioned in our previous article, the three vices of powerful men are lust, lust and lust; lust for sex, lust for money and lust for power, in no particular order, or gender identity. Examples of all three lusts have “painted” 5,000 years of our alleged civilized history, in living and sometimes unprintable color.

In most cases, once an individual has reached the pinnacle of immense wealth, they usually don’t want to stop there. They either want to increase their wealth even further, or they aspire to power, political power, power over people and power over the masses. It is true that some wealthy, powerful men do give back generously through philanthropy, probably to assuage their feelings of guilt for being so rich.

Nevertheless, wealth and power provide the opportunity to satisfy their lust for sex, which is also characterized by clandestine meetings where the participants are sworn to secrecy on threat of bodily harm.

Unfortunately, history is filled with rich, over-sexed, powerful and sometimes crazy men, exercising dictatorial power over groups, societies, cultures and nations. When men of wealth and political power meet, especially in secret, can the outcome be good for individual freedom, liberty, property rights, or sovereignty of any country? Using any means of inductive or deductive reasoning, the answer has to be a resounding NO!

The fact is, bigness, concentration of top-down power and out-of-control entities has buried WE THE PEOPLE in frustration, confusion and the feeling of helplessness, if not becoming abject debt slaves. America’s Founding Fathers were very concerned about who had control in the federal government and that is why they established the separation of powers doctrine between the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Unfortunately, the separation of powers doctrine has been seriously blurred and now it is abundantly apparent that each branch of government supports the other two branches, against the consent of the governed.

From the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson wrote: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,”

But as government got “bigger,” Jefferson’s “consent of the governed” phrase became essentially meaningless, as our representatives and senators assumed more and more power and turned government service into a lifetime career. In response to government bigness and power, business and labor had to get bigger and more powerful in order to have influence with big government. World Central Banks merged into a colluding consortium to protect their own interests.

Then big government started handing off some of their power and authority to bureaucracies, who then got bigger and assumed more power and authority than was ever dreamed of by the Founding Fathers. Since the “consent of the governed” was perceived to be powerless, special interest groups (socialists. radical environmentalists and one-world-order types) began getting bigger and more powerful in order to have more influence on big government and government policy. As government, bureaucracies, business, unions and special interest groups got larger and more powerful, they began to lose control, became arrogant and careless with their processes, personnel and finances and careless with constitutional limits. They are so out of control now that we hear never-ending reports of ineptness, gross negligence, waste, fraud, abuse and corruption.

So when bankers, industrialists, the press, ministers, prime ministers, royalty, international financiers and politicians get together for a big secret meeting, what would a normal, reasonable and prudent person conclude about what would be discussed? Two specific items come instantly to mind: 1) concentration of their power and 2) manipulation of the masses for profit, behavioral control and for social and environmental agendas that run contrary to the idea of God-given, unalienable, individual freedom. Social justice, environmental protection and man-caused global warming studies, reports and policies are nothing more than smoke screens to the real agenda, control over the money, the property and the freedom of the world’s masses, for the benefit of the conference attendees. To look for altruistic motives in the secret meetings of these persons of influence, is an affront to a rational person’s intellect.

The point that we are trying very hard to make here is that the ultimate power and control is still inherent in WE THE PEOPLE, if the PEOPLE are of one mind and that one mind is based on a solid foundation of the fundamentals of liberty. But we are so fragmented. divided and diverse, becoming of one mind is problematic. Until we are of one mind, bigness, concentration of power in oligarchies and out-of-control entities will be our undoing and our enslavement.

Men in dark suits, blue smoke and backroom deals, as in members of the Bilderberg Club, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations will, in the end, work against WE THE PEOPLE and eventually erode freedom and liberty, or erase it all together. The war we face in keeping wealthy, powerful and lustful men from dominating and controlling the lives of all individuals is eternal. It is WE THE PEOPLE who allowed bigness and the concentration of financial, political and economic power to become our enemy, by not paying attention and by not fully exercising our right and duty as “the consent of the governed”.

President Woodrow Wilson said in 1919: “We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” The small group of dominant men is called an oligarchy.

This small group of influential, lustful, dominant men will have their way with us, if we refuse to challenge them and dedicate our lives to keeping their three vices under reasonable control.

 

Here are two relevant quotes from groups of men who meet in secret and plot control of the free world, in their attempts to implement the new-world-order.

“The new world order will be built as an end run on national sovereignty. Eroding it, piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” Council on Foreign Relations Journal 1974, pg. 558

“We will have world government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” Paul Warburg, CFR & Architect of the Federal Reserve System in an address to the U.S. Senate 2/17/1950

It’s coming unless WE THE PEOPLE stop it.

Please let us know if you LIKED this article. Constructive comments are always welcome.

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

  Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America”, is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (http://www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. He can be reached for comment at info@narlo.org.

Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: info@narlo.org

 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

 

If the millions of people wasting their time on Facebook and other social media would read Ron’s articles instead, just maybe there would be some hope for America. However, I truly have no doubt they never will. It seems to me that our Nation has become the land of the irresponsible and the home of cowards. Never in my wildest dreams have I ever imagined such ineptitude as is currently being displayed by our citizens. With only 2084 words this article above should have created a firestorm of revolt, self disgust, and embarrassment that concluded in a mass invasion of Washington D.C. Politicians of every level should be quivering in fear of reprisal. Traffic should be at a standstill, and the media industry should have been abandoned from embarrassment, as no other organization has been more derelict in their duty to freedom. The ideology this Nation was founded on has been raped and abandoned by the very people it was designed to protect. With the clearest possible elucidation, this article is a testimony to the total failure of humanities greatest opportunity to remain free from tyranny. And all it took was the control of education. MAKE SURE YOU READ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE: An Interview with Judge Anna Von Reitz About Our History

10 13 11 flagbar

 

PLEASE LEARN THE TRUTH

April 2nd, 2016 by

 

4-2-2016 8-09-40 AM

By Olddog

It has been my objective to show you the magnitude of tyranny we have been buried under since the beginning of America, so you will eventually discard any and all loyalty to the United States Corporations and create your own study groups with local people of above average intellect, and prepare yourselves to instigate the dismantlement of all local corporate governments, bureaucracies’, and authorities; then rebuild our States and Counties with sovereign governments. I have possibly confused you by publishing current news along with a host of other web sites, but the real problem we have is in our ignorance of past events that enabled all the crap that’s going on in America and elsewhere. The current circus surrounding the Presidential election may be entertaining, but it is really a diversion that keeps us ignorant.

It should be expected that we will be accosted with extreme prejudice even from our own families, as the majority has always been more content to accept tyranny rather than the risk and labor of liberty.

I implore all men and women of intelligence and courage to concentrate on becoming astute wordsmiths capable of debating and teaching how we can become a Nation Unlike anything in history.

Our Continent has riches galore that have been under tyrannical control for hundreds of years while honest hard working American’s have suffered deprivation and scorn by these billionaire Bankers, and now is the time (BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE) to confront them with every ounce of our strength and determination. FREEDOM IS NOT FREE!

We are, after-all just demanding what we were promised!

You can begin your re-education of the real history of America’s government by bankers by visiting the following web sites, but it will be a lot easier if you begin with this book: You Know Something is Wrong When…..: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause (Paperback) by Judge Anna Maria Riezinger & James Clinton Belcher

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1491279184/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk

 

 http://www.annavonreitz.com/

http://fija.org/

http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

http://www.newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilyn205.htm

http://scannedretina.com/

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/01/regarding-take-over-of-blm-facilities.html

I welcome any comments you may have, as long as they are on the subject of participating.

olddog@anationbeguiled.com

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 

WHAT WOULD LIFE BE LIKE WITHOUT TOILET PAPER

March 29th, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ewart/ron244.htm

3-29-2016 9-29-33 AM

By Ron Ewart

NewsWithViews.com

Forgive us for entering into a subject that is best left in the bathroom, but without certain items of biological comfort we could be sent back to the dark days of outhouses and Sears catalogues. With the insanity that is radical environmentalism aside, our lifestyle and its comforts are a direct result of industrial ingenuity in turning trees (a renewable resource) into highly useful paper products from toilet and computer paper, to feminine napkins, Scot towels, packaging and grocery bags, etc., each product making our lives a little easier. Industry keeps coming up with new ideas to turn trees into paper, in all of its various forms. Of course, there are always the 22-year old brain-dead actresses telling us we can get along with one square per event. Obviously she never had a ………………………….., Never mind, we won’t go there.

But oh my God! When you make paper from trees it takes energy and in the process that evil CO2 is emitted. And of course we have to kill the trees to make the paper. That’s bad. But even worse is that we reduce the absorption of CO2 by removing the trees as well, except that we can re-plant trees. That’s why trees are a renewable resource.

Obviously, we must be killing the planet by our hedonistic lifestyle of greed and avarice, especially those rich Americans, and this practice must be brought to a halt immediately to save the planet. The environmentalists and the government tell us it is so and they have brainwashed millions of Americans (including our young school children) into believing it is true, except for a couple of little scientific “things” that the government and the radical environmentalists choose to ignore to promote their green agenda.

Two of these scientific “things” come to mind. CO2 (carbon dioxide) is heavier than air. CO2 sinks. It is a fact of physics. Yes, a small portion of CO2 that doesn’t sink to the ground to feed the trees, plants and plankton, ends up in the upper atmosphere due to churning, but a very tiny portion. Of all of the greenhouse gases, CO2 makes up 0.177%. But what is even more striking in these statistics is that the CO2, supposedly caused by man, is a small fraction of that 0.117%. In fact, the greatest greenhouse gas (95%), over which man has absolutely no control, is water vapor and obviously has the greatest effect on planet warming, or cooling as the case may be, if any, not withstanding the effects of that giant yellow orb in the sky.

So the government and the radical environmentalists would have us believe that a miniscule fraction of a gas, that is heavier than air, a gas that all living things on this planet could not survive without, is somehow heating our planet into a runaway global warming event and we are all going to die or drown, if we don’t repent to the God of Green! If you believe this poppy cock, we question your intellect.

The environmentalists and thus the government, don’t want us to drill for oil anywhere in the U. S., or won’t let us build any new pipelines, power plants, refineries, or dams. Meanwhile, other countries, like China and India are exploiting their sources of energy every day, in spite of their greenhouse gas emissions. But these same insane folks who run our asylum called a government, want to lock up as much of our land as possible from livestock (food), resource extraction (minerals, oil and trees) and people. They then implemented by law, the positively outrageous and questionable practice of turning our food into fuel, (ethanol from corn – Sorry Iowans) thereby driving up the price of almost every food group. Anyone with half a brain could see this coming 30 years ago. Some did and warned us, but the warnings went unheeded.

Let’s follow these events to their illogical and deleterious conclusion. Crude oil is the very foundation of the energy that powers our civilization in the western world. Just about everything is affected by the cost and availability of crude oil. A large fraction of crude goes into the production of fuel for cars, trucks, airplanes, ships and heating our homes and businesses. The rest goes into the production of plastics, paints and resins and many other products, you know, like nylons for women.

Transportation and the infrastructure that supports transportation, is absolutely vital to the distribution of every product we buy or sell, including food. If trucks and trains don’t roll and ships don’t ply the open seas, Albertson’s, Safeway, QFC, Costco, Fred Meyer and a host of other retailers and big box stores don’t get products to sell to you. Have you ever thought of where you will get your food, if your local grocery store’s shelves are empty? Perhaps from your neighbor at the point of a gun, if he has any food and if government hasn’t taken away your guns.

Food is kind of important to survival you know. Some think that if you can’t buy it, then you will have to take it by force. Now of course in such a scenario, your benevolent government would step in, declare martial law, nationalize all food production and distribution and ration it out as they see fit. Do you want to be at the end of the long line of how the government sees fit? How easy it is to control people when you own food and energy production. Could that be our future? Many think it is.

But this all fits a very evil pattern, driven by international environmentalists, one-world-order types, and the United Nations and Europe, in their eternal quest to bring the United States down to a third-world country by re-distribution of our wealth, our property rights and the destruction of our freedom. By driving up the price of everything, the thinking of governments and the radical environmentalists is that you will use less of things and move into cities where you won’t have to drive as far for your food or work and where you are much easier to control by government. And of course they are encouraging you to bicycle, walk, or take mass transit. It’s good for your health you know and the government and the radical environmentalists are very concerned about your health. Hardly!

If the environmentalists and the government succeed in taking away, or outlawing, crude oil and trees, we will be driven back into those days of outhouses, palm leaves and candles. We covered this possible outcome in our fiction story of Jeremy’s one day in the future. The article starts out:

“Jeremy huddled in a corner of the old log cabin, out of the wind, even though it blew through the cracks in the walls and whistled and moaned with a haunting, bone-chilling sound. The sky was dark, gray and menacing. The coming twilight filled him with dread. There would be no artificial light for the approaching darkness and he tried not to think of the long night ahead.”

“Our own oil, coal and natural gas resources had been shut off by the environmentalists and the Obama administration. The entire energy infrastructure had fallen into disrepair. Oil, gas and coal companies had shut their doors because of too many restrictions and exorbitant emission taxes. The wind and solar power that Obama promised would replace fossil fuels, was just one of his worthless, but very expensive pipe dreams, like so many other socialist and radical environmental policies he implemented. Power plants quit running for lack of transportation, energy resources and maintenance personnel. The power grid was ravaged by neglect, natural forces and frequent domestic and foreign terrorist attacks. But that was of no consequence. There was no power to distribute to the grid.”

Read the rest of the story HERE.

Throughout history dictators have herded the people out of the countryside and into large cities where they can be controlled to a much higher degree. Remember the Nazi’s Warsaw ghetto? A dictator’s, or a liberal president’s worst enemy is a freethinking rural landowner, who just might start a revolution.

So the next time you have the opportunity to send a donation to an environmental group, or vote for a politician that will do whatever the environmentalists or socialists want them to do, think twice, or maybe four times. You could be funding and voting for your own demise, not to mention the high possibility of losing your freedom and control over life-sustaining food and toilet paper. Right now government controls your money, your land, your water, your food, your energy and your health care. What’s left?

WE THE PEOPLE have a choice, either become the CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED again, or be slaves to the GOVERNMENT, where they take your money, your land, your health care and control the distribution of your food and energy.

Imagine what the world would be like if there were no toilet paper, or worse, no food at your local grocery store. A hungry belly has nothing to lose by stealing, looting, killing, or going to war. It is happening in many parts of the world right now. And don’t be fooled. It can happen here!

People who fail or refuse to confront and stop tyranny, are destined to be enslaved by it.

But then, who is going to lift a finger to stop the socialists, the environmentalists and the one-world-order types? Americans could stop this freedom-robbing madness within a few years if there were enough people willing to act and enough money to fund their efforts. Sadly, out of 320,000,000 people and the richest nation on earth, there is neither ….. at least not now. Evidently, things just aren’t bad enough yet, even though half the people are living off the sweat, blood and tears of the other half and the former half get to vote to force the latter half to pay. One hundred years ago, that egregious injustice would have ignited a revolution. But not today where we live in a cesspool of political correctness, irrational compassion, radical environmentalism, multi-culturalism and the liberty-starving ideology of social justice.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

  Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America”, is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (http://www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. He can be reached for comment at info@narlo.org.

Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: info@narlo.org

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I don’t care what any body say’s; for good old fashion satire, or down right sarcastic vitriol you simply cannot beat Ron Ewart. Ron, you have my admiration and make me jealous, but I love ya.

10 13 11 flagbar

AMERICAN MATRIX HOW WE LOST OUR CONSTITUTION PART 1 & 2

March 28th, 2016 by

http://newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilyn205.htm

3-27-2016 1-48-28 PMTHE U.S. CIVIL FLAG

By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
January 13, 2015
NewsWithViews.com Archives http://www.newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilynA.htm

Do you want your Constitutional Republic back? If so, this article provides you with information that will help you achieve that objective. It won’t come through Constitutional Conventions, Conventions of the States, or memorizing the Constitution and going to court with constitutional arguments in a court system the jurisdiction for which functions under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and Maritime Law.

Your Constitutions (national and state) have been put in hibernation and are brought out like the good silver… only when needed to make an impression or to be used in self defense for crimes committed against the people by those in government who are supposed to serve us.
Some questions for you:

  1. Are you aware that the United States is incorporated? No, this article isn’t about Strawmen or your name being in CAPITAL letters on all legal documents like your birth certificate, driver’s license, Social Security Card, Passport, etc. There is the United States of America and there is the United States of America, Inc. There is a good reason for what happened and it does not involve the bankruptcy of this nation.
  2. Are you aware that the state in which you live is incorporated? All 50 states are incorporated. Read on and I’ll provide you with absolute evidence… not opinion, but evidence.
  3. Are you aware that your county is incorporated?
  4. Are you aware that your city (or township) is incorporated? (Most of us are aware of city incorporations.)
  5. Are you aware that most departments within your city and county are incorporated? Yes, I mean the Sheriff’s Department, the Police Department, the City and County and State Courts (even your State Supreme Court), the Public Library, the Public Works Department, the Department of Education and the County Clerk? Almost every department in your city and county is incorporated. I must admit, this disclosure surprised me more than the others. Even more interesting, most people who staff these departments – including county commissioners, sheriffs, librarians, police chiefs, and other department heads – appear, as I was, unaware of the corporate status of their “departments.”

Here’s a link to my County Sheriff’s office. Notice that it is registered as a “privately held company.” The name listed, Stan Hilkey, was the Sheriff of Mesa County at the time I downloaded the information a couple of months ago. Look your own county Sheriff up on Manta.com and see if your law enforcement is incorporated. My county courts are also incorporated. Are yours? To prove it’s not just a Colorado thing, here’s a link to Alabama’s courts as listed at Manta.com. Look yours up… my bet is that they are also incorporated.

6. Are you aware that corporations are run under the jurisdiction of Statutory Law, not Constitutional or Common Law? Are you aware that Articles of Incorporation based on the policies and regulations in place in all 50 States are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code and/or Maritime Law which are the basis of Statutory Law?

In other words, when wearing their corporate hats (which is whenever it is to their advantage to do so), our federal, state, county, and city governments and the departments contained within them must comply with the policies of the Uniform Commercial Code, not with the Constitution of the United States or your State Constitution. The courts, too, are incorporated. No wonder we see so little Constitutional or Common Law in our courts! No wonder administrative law judges can make the law up as a trial proceeds (or so it appears to those thinking the jurisdiction under which courts function is Constitutional or Common Law)!

This information should answer the questions of many Americans who wander around shaking their heads trying to figure out why our courts are making the insane, unconstitutional decisions that spew out of them like the Devil’s bad breath. The Courts are incorporated and comply with the requirements of Statutory Law based on the policies and procedures dictated by the Uniform Commercial Code or Maritime Law, not the United States Constitution or your State’s Constitution.

People look at their small town police departments being equipped as if they are General Patton in the 1940’s powering his way through Germany and wonder why Humvees and SWAT teams are needed to protect them. Who – or what – are they really protecting?

And it goes beyond our police departments and sheriffs’ offices to our courts and schools and property taxes… and everything else.

You need to know whether what I’m saying is true or false. Go to Manta.com and look up your own state, county and city. Especially look at the departments within your city and county… your fire, sheriff and police departments, your county clerk, the State and County Courts, etc.

Why is this information critical if we are to understand why America is in many cases functioning in a way designed to destroy Her? Why is it “dangerous” information?

The answer is direct and simple: CORPORATIONS (INCLUDING GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS) DO NOT FUNCTION UNDER A CONSTITUTION. THEY FUNCTION UNDER ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO BUSINESS LAWS OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND MARITIME LAW, NOT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. EVEN MORE IMPORTANT, CORPORATIONS CAN BE DISSOLVED! THAT IS THE BIGGEST DANGER OF THE PEOPLE BECOMING AWARE OF THIS INFORMATION. THE CORPORATE STRUCTURE THEY HAVE BUILT TO REMOVE OUR ACCESS TO CONSTITUTIONAL AND COMMON LAW IN OUR COURTS CAN, LIKE ANY CORPORATION, BE DISSOLVED. IT IS, PERHAPS, THEIR ACHILLES HEEL – their greatest weakness! We, the People, CAN DISSOLVE THEM!

The corporations cannot be dissolved by the government employees who work for them; they must be dissolved by the people. How? County by county. These corporations were imposed from the top down and the only way to disassemble them is from the bottom up. Carry a petition. Get the required number of signatures and get it on your county ballot next election. The initiative should say something like “No government entity in _____ County shall incorporate or be incorporated. All government agencies, divisions and departments must function under the legal jurisdiction of the Constitution of the State of _____ and be subject to the limits imposed on government by the Constitution of the United States and the State of _______.” I’m not a lawyer and I’m sure you can get a stronger statement from an attorney experienced at writing ballot initiatives.

As I will point out in Part II of this article, liberty is not free and if you want your constitutional rights restored, it will require some long-term planning and changes in the way county costs are defined and financed… but it can be done! If you would rather our cost of liberty and constitutional rights be paid via budgeting and taxation instead of young men and women being unnecessarily killed and maimed in unlawful, unconstitutional wars, you will help dissolve the government corporations that help make such tragedies possible.

I must admit, I am surprised this material has been around as long as it has and none of the many lawyers who have been exposed to it had a light go off in their heads saying “Corporations do not function under Constitutional Law which is why Americans are being abused by their courts — and corporations can be dissolved, SO LET’S DISSOLVE THEM!.”

You can logically assume that if your city/township, county, state, and federal governments are incorporated, they do not function under the aegis (protection) of a Constitution of any kind. They function under the rules and regulations of the Uniform Commercial Code. The law and how we lost the jurisdictional protection of Common and Constitutional law is the topic of Part II of this article.

Do you now understand why your courts and law enforcement officials do not act in accordance with the limits placed on government by the United States Constitution – or, even more important, your State’s Constitution?

In the past month, I’ve been to two meetings about jurisdictional law given by experts on Constitutional law. Both were very good… both speakers were quick to point out the rights God grants each of us and the limits on government guaranteed under the Constitution. Neither realized that the constitutional rights of the people are being badly abused because of the corporate status of federal, state, county, city governments and most of the departments that function under those entities and thus do not answer to Federal and State Constitutions. Neither speaker realized that corporations are under the jurisdiction of Statutory or business law – the Uniform Commercial Code/Maritime Law. It raises a difficult question for constitutional experts: If the various governments, including our courts, function under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code rather than the Constitution, how important is a Constitution that has been hi-jacked?

Before moving on to Part II of this article which will explain the kinds of jurisdictional law being practiced in American courts, I want to provide you what I promised. Evidence.

It’s time to stop speculating about issues, wondering (what a waste of time) if this crisis or that one is a false flag. “They” rely on chaos to keep you off balance because only by keeping you off balance can they take their next unlawful step designed to eliminate the asset singly responsible for preventing socialism or communism in America’s capitalist economy: The middle class. They throw one issue after another at you… from amnesty to police brutality; from shopping center shootings to elementary school shootings to shootings of police officers sitting innocently in their car. They take you from one false flag to another. They throw one war after another at you… or threaten a new war. As the manipulation of gold was used to cause the Great Depression of the early 1900’s, they use the new gold – oil – to manipulate this even Greater Depression.

They can call it a recession all they want, but the only reason people are not standing in food lines as they did in the 1930s is food stamps. They called the job creation programs of the Great Depression the Work(s) Progress Administration (WPA). In the 30s, cities all over the country got new parks and recreation facilities, bridges were built as were schools and highways… the work of the WPA. It provided jobs for the unemployed. For this current Greater Depression it is called “shovel ready jobs.”

When they hire a new government employee, it depletes the tax base rather than adding to it, so new government hires cannot be categorized as “new jobs” produced by the economy. But the Obama Administration needs to look like it is doing SOMETHING right, so they “create” new jobs by funding them via private sector contractor work projects. Then they can be counted as new jobs… just as Franklin Delano Roosevelt did with WPA jobs – but government, not a thriving free marketplace, is paying for these “new jobs.” Regardless of stock market ups and downs, the marketplace is not thriving. It is being manipulated.

I believe the core problem centers on the incorporation of every federal, state, and county and all of the departments within each and the resulting system that had to be built to support itself. Logic tells me that if we get rid of the corporations, we remove their ability to manipulate our courts and all government offices with no personal accountability. I believe if we take action while we still can, we can retrieve our nation from what the international central banking system has thrown in the trash bin of history without first ensuring the corpse is dead.

If I’m correct, this is not only the most important article I’ve ever written for any news publication, it is also one of the most important articles you will ever read. It’s also the most dangerous… for me, at least – and for Paul Walter, the publisher of NewsWithViews.com.

Why is it dangerous? Because it offers a solution to the conundrum (unsolvable puzzle) “they” have created. Over a long period of time (it began in the late 1800s), “they” created the conundrum to give them sufficient time to globally enslave all but the elitists. The same techniques if not the same programs are being used around the world. The objective? Global government composed of oligarchies (an elite class and a labor class – no middle class) worldwide.

Manta.com is a Web site that provides corporate information. It costs a few hundred dollars to be a member of Dunn & Bradstreet – and when I owned my own company, I was a member. I no longer am. So, I use Manta.com because it’s free. Manta provides the names of about 40 million for-profit private companies – including government.

Here is a Manta.com copy of a listing for the State of Colorado.

3-28-2016 10-58-04 AM

If you look at the bottom of the Manta form, you’ll see that Democrat Governor Hickenlooper is referenced as Colorado’s CEO rather than the State’s Governor. Why? Just as corporations do not run on Constitutional law, neither do corporations have Governors. They have Chief Executive Officers. Or, they have Managers… check out California’s Governor, Jerry Brown. Manta.com lists him as California’s “Manager” and California is “A privately held company in Sacramento, CA.”

Here’s more evidence of the incorporation of America’s sovereign states and their cities and counties.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is, like Hickenlooper, listed as that state’s Chief Executive Officer. On the Walker link to Wisconsin’s Washington, D.C. Executive Office (why do Governors need offices in D.C.? – because their state is incorporated there and a corporation needs an office in the location of incorporation), scroll down and look at the Washington, D.C. Executive Office for the State of New York. Wisconsin and New York are on the same page. This particular link tells you that the State of New York is incorporated in the District of Columbia and that Derek Douglas is the Manager of the Washington, D.C. office, not the Governor. I researched Douglas, wondering why he is listed as the Washington, D.C.-based New York Governor’s Office Manager. I found a Press Release from the White House stating that Derek Douglas was an urban affairs special assistant to the President of the United States.

Maryland’s Executive Office D.C. listing shows its State of Incorporation as the District of Columbia. Does it surprise you to learn that Governors have Executive Offices located in the District of Columbia? New York is just one example. Go here to find the D.C. Executive Offices for Pennsylvania, Iowa, Florida, Wisconsin, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Idaho, California, Delaware, and Oregon. This article provides too little space to list all 50, but they are there. Here’s the link for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I said our cities and counties have been incorporated. Here is the Manta.com listing for the City of Birmingham, Alabama. State of Incorporation is Alabama… the city IS incorporated. Most of us know that cities are incorporated. Most of us did not know that our counties are incorporated and that almost every department and division within our incorporated cities and counties are incorporated, too.

For many years, people have talked about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and have tried to find where the CAFR funds are hidden. Where in the world could “they” be hiding them? The federal, state, county and city corporations would be a good guess. No one knows about them.

Did I mention that each of these entities has two identities? There is, for example, the State of Colorado – and there is the State of Colorado, Inc. There is a County of Denver – and there is a Denver County, Inc., etc. They cannot drop the Constitutional identity because if they do, they lose “We, the People…” who didn’t volunteer to be part of their corporation. Thus, it appears every government, no matter how large or how small, in the country has dual identities, one incorporated and one unincorporated.

Here are some Manta.com links you can use to start doing your own research. When you find your Sheriff’s Department is incorporated, when you find your local Courts are incorporated, you might just want to start carrying a petition to get signatures demanding a vote of the people to dissolve all government corporations within your county and demand that they function under your State Constitution rather than under Statutory Jurisdiction which offers citizens no Constitutional protections from government usurpation of the power of individual citizens. It will surprise only a few to learn in Part II of this article that it all began with the Federal Reserve System.

Or you can contact any of the 374 veterans organizations listed as companies by the Federal Government. Now we know how they could withhold medical benefits from our veterans. We know why no one who participated in withholding the medical services from dying men and women entitled to those services was terminated from government payrolls: They were wearing their corporate hats.

Here are links to some Manta.com veterans’ listings (you usually have to scroll to the bottom of the page to get what you want… not all listings about veterans involve government agencies like the Veterans Administration; Manta lists private companies that deal with veterans, too).

Dunn & Bradstreet is the official organization that registers and keeps track of American business credit ratings. They assign DUNS code numbers so corporate credit ratings can be found by lenders or other creditors when companies apply for credit. Below, you will find the DUNS code number for your state and its largest city.

Below are the Dunn & Bradstreet numbers assigned to some federal government offices. After the federal government listings, every state and its largest population center DUNS data is provided. The DUNS numbers are not the result of my own research — the Manta.com material is data I have been personally researching since last summer. The DUNS numbers have been listed on the Internet since February 2013, but I have been unable to find the person who did all of this work. I will say the Louisiana and Tennessee numbers appear incorrect (all have 9 numbers assigned except these two). As a non Dunn & Bradstreet member, I have no way to go to the D&B site and verify them but hope they will be helpful to you.

3-28-2016 11-01-36 AMThis list creates a lot of interesting questions. For example, why does the U.S. Internal Revenue Service need a DUNs number – unless it is incorporated? Looking at the above list of departments within the U.S. Government, does it give you any insight to how “they” get away with the VA scandal, Fast and Furious guns across the border, Benghazi, the IRS discrimination against conservative groups applying for tax exempt status? Relative to the law, corporations are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (or the Law of the Seas – sometimes called Maritime Law). They have no obligation to protect anyone’s Constitutional rights when functioning under their corporate hats – and they keep the Constitutional hat available in case they get caught and need to declare their Constitutional rights to certain protections – like Lois Lerner’s use of the Fifth Amendment when she testified before Congress. Perhaps that explains the smirk on her face during that proceeding?

Remember the controversy about Lerner’s appearance before the Senate Committee before which she testified? “She can’t make a statement pronouncing her innocence and then declare her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid answering questions about her possible guilt! That’s against the law!” That’s what every constitutional law expert said… and had she been functioning under the Constitution, they would have been correct.

When she made her statement, she was wearing her corporate hat. When she declared her rights under the Constitution, she was wearing her constitutional hat. It is the best possible example I can give you about why they need to maintain their rights under BOTH the Constitution and the Corporations for which they work. The Constitution gives them protections from personal liability they would not otherwise have.

Here is the Dunn & Bradstreet listing of numbers assigned to cities and states:

3-28-2016 11-03-01 AM3-28-2016 11-03-47 AM3-28-2016 11-04-37 AMPart II of this article will explain how America’s laws morphed from Constitutional to Statutory law. It involves debt (and explains why Congress is so adamantly tied to ever increasing and ongoing debt). [The book: The Coming Battle, published in 1899, documents how the politicians of that period didn’t want the debt to be paid off. They wanted the debt to be rolled over from generation to generation. It continues to this day. It’s a must read.]

Click here for part —–> 2, OR SCROLL DOWN

© 2015 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

 

AMERICAN MATRIX: HOW WE LOST OUR CONSTITUTION
PART 2

http://newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilyn206.htm

By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
January 16, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

COLORABLE MONEY, COLORABLE LAW, COLORABLE LIBERTY

Before providing you with the following information, I must state that I am not an attorney and have not studied the law. I’m a retired banker who has done a lot of research on this subject.

What we learned in Part I is that federal, state, county and city governments and most of the departments and divisions that are part of them are incorporated. We learned that corporations function under Articles of Incorporation, not a Constitution and that’s how we lost our constitutional rights and courts that support them.

We learned that corporations are governed by business laws having to do with Maritime Law (also called Law of the Seas or Admiralty Law both of which are historically very old) and the Uniform Commercial Code. We learned that Constitutional Law is based on Common Law (which is based on substance and the will of the people — the Will of God, too, many people say). For example, under Common Law we are provided the alternative of not testifying against ourselves; that is not part of Maritime Law.

To understand the damage that has been done to our nation, we need to define the word “colorable” – its meaning, its impact on our currency, our courts, and our constitutional liberties and the limits the Constitution places on government. It is from the meaning of the word “colorable” that the virus of death infecting our nation breeds and keeps breeding… like Ebola, it dissolves every major life-giving organ in its path until death ensues.

COLORABLE MONEY – COLORABLE COURTS

To be “colorable,” is for something to appear to be what it is not. It looks real, you are told by your government that it is real and, in the example of currency, it is used or behaves as if it’s real, but it is not. Take what you are told is a dollar bill from your billfold. It looks like a dollar bill. You can spend it like a dollar bill. But it is not a dollar bill. It is a Federal Reserve Note. It says so, right on the face of it – at the top, above George Washington’s picture.

In the world of banking, what is a note? Answer: It is a loan. It is credit. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, fiat money has no value in and of itself, but it can be exchanged… like Monopoly money. A direct quote from the Minneapolis Fed: …(fiat currency can be exchanged) “for goods and services… because (the people) are confident it will be honored when they buy goods and services.”

Money and currency are not the same. We used to have money in America but when the dollar was no longer backed by gold or silver our “money” became a fiat currency. These things called a “Federal Reserve Note” became colorable currency, something that behaved like money because people could use it to buy groceries, cars, electronics, etc., and also pay for services like health care and life insurance. But it was not money. It was colorable… it just serves as a paper currency. Money is something of substance – like gold or silver. For Common Law to exist, money of substance must exist.

If a (colorable) Federal Reserve Note becomes part of a contract, the contract also becomes colorable. Colorable contracts, in turn, must be adjudicated under a “colorable” jurisdiction (system of justice – our courts). So when the colorable currency called Federal Reserve Notes was created, the government had to create a jurisdiction (court system) to cover colorable contracts. The incorporated governments called this new form of jurisdiction Statutory Law because though it was based on the Uniform Commercial Code which is based on Admiralty Law, “Statutory” is neither. Thus, Statutory Jurisdiction is colorable.

It sounds complicated, but if you think about it for a few minutes, it is really quite simple. Public Law was used in Common Law courts; Public Policy is used in Statutory courts… and that’s what gave bureaucrats control of our courtrooms. That’s what gave them the ability to prosecute members of the public because a regulation passed by a government agency rather than a law passed by Congress or your State Legislature, was violated.

So our courts have changed… how many times in the past years have you heard the term “The Petitioner does not have Standing to file this case… dismissed!” We have been unable to file cases against our government even when clear abuses of power exist. How many juries have been given rules they are told they must follow in determining a verdict, leaving them no choice other than “guilty” or “not guilty” regardless of what the evidence indicates? How many judges have withheld evidence from a jury? It has brought topics like “Nullification” to the forefront of the politically active. Nullification deals with a jury’s right to dismiss from its decision of guilt or innocence the judge’s directions as to what the jury may or may not consider in reaching its decision. Juries are empowered to nullify the judge’s directions if they feel it is justified.

All of this and more has been caused by the change from Common to a colorable form of Maritime Law called Statutory Law… a form of law required when our various governments incorporated — which, in turn, was required when the Federal Reserve System presented us with a “colorable currency.”

What have we Americans been taught by our government-subsidized education about the cause of our Revolutionary War? Mostly we were told about the Boston Tea Party, the Midnight Ride of Paul Revere, and other nice stories.

Many people say the Revolution began because of the Crown’s Declaratory Act which taxed tea, taxed stamps, forced colonists to quarter in their homes members of the English military, etc. No. It began because of the Rothschilds and their central bank system which, in today’s world, has driven us to the brink of another world war.

It’s true that all those things were great irritants, but the real core problem involved central banking – the Bank of England. The colonists were forced by England’s King to use a paper currency issued by the Bank of England which demanded we use it – and we were to cede our colonial banking and monetary systems and pay interest to the Bank of England for using their paper money.

It sounds eerily like the way the Federal Reserve System in America works today, doesn’t it? It is, in fact, quite similar. So we must start with the assumption that what made our ancestors go to war in the 1700s is quite acceptable to Americans today because we have embraced what they were willing to die to prevent: Central banks and a fiat currency.

The Rothschilds were around when America was a colony of Great Britain and the fact that we were founded on the basis of Common Law troubled them. Why? Common Law is based on substance and rejects “colorable money” and “colorable courts.” Article 1 Section 8 of our Constitution describes for you what “substance” relative to Common Law means: “Gold and silver,” not a meaningless fiat currency that has nothing backing it. That is a currency with no substance and violates Common Law.

Prior to the forming of the Federal Reserve System, America’s Constitutional Republic required the nation to pay its debts in gold or silver and Rothschild banks did not loan gold or silver. Thus they did not like our newly-formed government which rejected a fiat currency with nothing backing it (what we have today). As described above, the Rothschilds allowed the King of England to borrow paper money from them and got repaid in gold and silver.

Our Constitution declared gold and silver as the official currency of the United States of America and that’s why the Rothschilds financed the War of 1812. They wanted America as part of the United Kingdom so they could expand into the New World their Bank of England scam. They of course lost the War of 1812 and began seeking other ways to further their “we’ll loan you paper and you pay us back in gold and silver” scheme and began working on what we now have as a central banking system, the Federal Reserve, founded on December 23, 1913, 100 years after the War of 1812. And how legitimate is the Federal Reserve Act of 1913? Not very. Read the history.

Our ancestors in North America began to revolt against the Brits but we had Common Law in the Colonies at the time. When the King’s tax collectors made their rounds, however, they imposed Admiralty Law on the people. It enabled them to arrest and quickly try people, denying to what were mostly Englishmen and women the common rights due them as citizens of the Crown. That is what caused the Revolutionary War.

Perhaps the most interesting part of our history is that almost exactly the same thing has happened to us once again. What’s the old saying about what happens if we don’t learn from history? By incorporating federal, state, and county governments (because of the Federal Reserve’s colorable currency), the U.S. Government made it possible to remove the Common Law supported by our U.S. Constitution and implement a prostituted form of Maritime (or Admiralty) Law called Statutory Law. Our ancestors refused to tolerate it and it will be interesting to see if today’s society which seems more motivated by security and comfort than by right and wrong and liberty will accept the Law of the Seas.

To make sure we’re all on the same page, let’s start with some definitions and let them guide you to an understanding of how we got in our current mess. Only if we understand the history behind these massive problems will we be able to solve them.

To explain how the loss of Common Law robbed us of our independence and our Republic and how incorporating federal, state, and county governments made it possible, we need some definitions. You’re about to get a graduate school crash course in business and finance (and a little law):

JURISDICTION:

1. The right of a court to hear a particular case, based on the scope of its authority over the type of case and the parties to the case. 2. Authority or control. 3. The extent of authority or control. 4. The territorial range of authority or control.

While researching the jurisdiction of our courts, I came upon an article that was so well done, so easy for a non-lawyer to understand, I decided to reprint portions of it here. One of the difficult things about writing both Parts I and II of this article is stating things in a way that can be understood by non-bankers and non-lawyers. Since I’m not a lawyer, I particularly appreciated this article and recommend that you read it in its entirety HERE. I am not publishing the entire article below, just those parts that apply to this topic.

The article is a condensed story about a man named Howard Freeman and is based on a seminar Freeman gave in 1990. The article is written in ham and eggs English and is not filled with legal terminology that forces you to look every-other-word up in a legal dictionary. The following definition about Common Law, Equity Law, Admiralty/Maritime Law, Courts of Contract, Colorable Money and Colorable Courts, and the Uniform Commercial Code is taken from that seminar and the article written about it.

The Constitution of the United States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may operate:

COMMON LAW

Common Law is based on God’s law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself. For instance, when you cross over the state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, ” BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS – IT’S THE LAW. ” This cannot be Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But Common Law cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT, and is punishable.

EQUITY LAW

Equity Law is law which compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. So, if you have compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation of the contract. Now this can only be a civil action – not criminal. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried criminally, but you can be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If you then refuse to perform as directed by the court, you can be charged with contempt of court, which is a criminal action. Are our seatbelt laws Equity Laws? No, they are not, because you cannot be penalized or punished for not keeping to the letter of a contract. (BARNEWALL NOTE: You may have signed an insurance contract agreeing to always wear your seat belts or otherwise obey all traffic laws and, of course, your state requires automobile insurance coverage.)

ADMIRALTY/MARITIME LAW

This is civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adhering to the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see what jurisdiction the seatbelt laws (all traffic codes, etc) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/Maritime Law and there must be a valid international contract in force.

However, the courts don’t want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdictions, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That is what the Supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case (Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, Supreme Court, 1938) – that the decisions will be based on commercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since they were instructed not to call it Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.

COURTS OF CONTRACT

You must ask how we got into this situation where we can be charged with failure to wear seatbelts and be fined for it. Isn’t the judge sworn to up hold the Constitution? Yes, he is. But you must understand the Constitution, in Article I, § 10, gives us the unlimited right to contract, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty or property of someone else. Contracts are enforceable, and the Constitution gives two jurisdictions where contracts can be enforced – Equity or Admiralty. But we find them being in Statutory Jurisdiction. This is the embarrassing part for the courts, but we can use this to box the judges into a corner in their own courts.

CONTRACTS MUST BE VOLUNTARY

Under the Common Law, every contract must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally by both parties or it is void and unenforceable. This is characteristic: It must be based on substance. For example, contracts used to read, “For one dollar and other valuable considerations, I will paint your house,” etc. That was a valid contract – the dollar was a genuine, silver dollar. Now, suppose you wrote a contract that said, “For one Federal Reserve Note and other considerations, I will paint your house….” And suppose, for example, I painted your house the wrong color. Could you go into a Common Law court and get justice? No, you could not. You see, a Federal Reserve Note is a “colorable” dollar, as it has no substance, and in a Common Law Jurisdiction, that contract would be unenforceable.

COLORABLE MONEY – COLORABLE COURTS

Colorable: That which exists in appearance only, and not in reality; not what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned have the appearance of truth. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

It is “colorable” Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing because we are using “colorable money.” Colorable Admiralty is now known as Statutory Jurisdiction. Let’s see how we got under this Statutory Jurisdiction.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE

The government set up a “colorable” law system to fit the “colorable” currency. It used to be called the Law Merchant or the Law of Redeemable Instruments, because it dealt with paper which was redeemable in something of substance. But, once Federal Reserve Notes had become unredeemable, there had to be a system of law which was completely “colorable” from start to finish. This system of law was codified as the Uniform Commercial Code, and has been adopted in every state. This is “colorable” law, and it is used in all the courts.

(End of text from Howard Freeman’s seminar.)

Do you see how the Federal Reserve Notes were the basic cause of the problems we now see in our courts, our financial system, our Republic, our Independence as a people? They created a fiat currency backed by nothing. Keep in mind, the word “Note” means “Loan.” It is “colorable currency.”

The Common Law, as embodied in the US Constitution, for the protection and security of persons and property, is Substantive Common Law – [substantive right: a right {as of life, liberty, property, or reputation} held to exist for its own sake and to constitute part of the normal legal order of society] – the intention of the Founding Fathers being the assurance of access to this law by the people.

The most important thing we the people can work to achieve is Constitutional Counties. This system was imposed on us from the top down and must be unwound from the bottom up.

As I said in Part I of this article, corporations can be dissolved – and we need to do that. It’s not difficult to achieve… get enough signatures on a petition to get the initiative on your county ballot and vote the corporations out of existence.

It is, however, more difficult than it sounds. It requires extensive planning because you must remember how we got from a Constitutional Republic to Crony Capitalism. Here’s what I think happened.

The Federal Reserve came into being in 1913. Our money was turned into a fiat currency when President Nixon took us off of the gold standard. The U.S. Government was based on Common Law which made colorable money (money lacking substance – Common Law is based on substance) and that made it impossible for it to continue issuing Federal Reserve Notes. So the federal government incorporated itself which made it possible for them to continue with the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes. It became clear that the states could not accept colorable money from an incorporated federal government unless they, too, were incorporated – and the same thing happened to our counties. To gain access to a colorable currency, an entire system had to be created. How much simpler our lives would be if the Treasury Department had taken over America’s monetary system rather than build this octopus so the Federal Reserve System could be maintained! This attests to the power of the Rothschild central banking system. We might want to keep in mind that one of the primary problems in the Middle East is that Islam does not allow loan usury (interest) and not all of the nations in the Middle East have central banks. Libya didn’t have one – until Muammar Gaddafi was removed from office and killed. Libya now has a central bank. (The Stylebook at the Washington Post spells it “Gaddafi.” The Stylebook at the Associated Press spells it “Gadhafi.”)

Though it is not difficult to dissolve the corporations if it is the will of the people to regain their constitutional rights, a great deal of thought must go into how a county that dissolves its corporations will survive without federal and state dollars. Some of the questions that arise are:

  1. If Common Law is returned to our court system and our governing bodies, it requires a currency that has substance and contracts based on that substance. Fiat currency – Federal Reserve Notes – has no substance. How can those people being paid by the federal, state, or county governments get paid in a currency of substance? How about people receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits? How about veterans receiving retirement and VA benefits? They are being paid in Federal Reserve Notes (as we all are) which, since they are not redeemable in gold or silver, are deemed as having no substance and contracts with no substance are rejected by Common Law. This part of problem resolution is complex – but with good planning it can be done.
  2. Can fiat currency be used at all in a Constitutional County?
  3. Is there a way to reject the colorable Statutory Laws created by federal and state governments and build a bridge between Common Law and the Uniform Commercial Code, Admiralty/Maritime Law, Equity Law, etc.?

There are many other questions, but to ask and answer them requires a book, not an article. The purpose of this two-part article has been to explain to you what I believe happened and what I believe the solution to be. It will not be easy. Nor will it be free.

Liberty is never free. How much you value it will determine the price you are willing to pay to regain it.

[The book: The Coming Battle, published in 1899, documents how the politicians of that period didn’t want the debt to be paid off. They wanted the debt to be rolled over from generation to generation. It continues to this day. It’s a must read.]

Click here for part —–> 1,

© 2015 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall began her career in 1956 as a journalist with the Wyoming Eagle in Cheyenne. During her 20 years (plus) as a banker and bank consultant, she wrote extensively for The American Banker, Bank Marketing Magazine, Trust Marketing Magazine, was U.S. Consulting Editor for Private Banker International (London/Dublin), and other major banking industry publications. She has written seven non-fiction books about banking and taught private banking at Colorado University for the American Bankers Association. She has authored seven banking books, one dog book, and two works of fiction (about banking, of course). She has served on numerous Boards in her community.

Barnewall is the former editor of The National Peace Officer Magazine and as a journalist has written guest editorials for the Denver Post, Rocky Mountain News and Newsweek, among others. On the Internet, she has written for News With Views, World Net Daily, Canada Free Press, Christian Business Daily, Business Reform, and others. She has been quoted in Time, Forbes, Wall Street Journal and other national and international publications. She can be found in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who of American Women, Who’s Who in Finance and Business, and Who’s Who in the World.

Web site: http://marilynwrites.blogspot.com

E-Mail: marilynmacg@juno.com

Marilyn’s Archives  http://www.newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilynA.htm

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM

Strong Cities Network Plan for Globally Controlled Police

March 26th, 2016 by

http://www.jbs.org/mobile/jbs-news/featured-news/item/18217-stop-the-

strong-cities-network-plan-for-globally-controlled-police

3-26-2016 9-21-38 AM

By John F. McManus

Because the enemies of freedom never sleep, the guardians of liberty must remain ever vigilant, and ever ready to combat treachery.

Several decades ago, federal planners sought to assign a new status for each of our nation’s states. No longer would there be 50 individual states with their own constitutions, traditions, and borders. Instead, there would be 10 federal districts, each governed from a centrally located office chock full of eager bureaucrats. Gone would be the built-in competition among the states to be the best state, the one with the least taxation and controls, the great inhibitors of growth and productivity.

That planned alteration of state governments did get started and federal offices were indeed established. If you lived in Pennsylvania, you and the people in surrounding states would now be in federal district 2. Californians and their neighbors would be in district 10, and so on. Because sufficient resistance to this revolutionary monstrosity arose, it never got very far and ended up in a memory hole. But those who want a different kind of government here in America, even a super or world government for all of mankind, never stop figuring out new ways to establish their rule. Their latest venture carries the label Strong Cities Network (SCN).

Leading the charge for this new venture is one of President Obama’s newest Cabinet officials, Attorney General Loretta Lynch. It’s hardly a surprise to know that she spelled out the new plan in a September 29, 2015 speech at United Nations headquarters in New York City. Nor is it surprising that New York City’s mayor, the ultra liberal Bill de Blasio, introduced her for that speech.

A Harvard University graduate — both undergraduate and law school — Lynch served as a Federal Reserve official from 2003 to 2005. Appointed U.S. attorney for the eastern district of New York by President Obama, she held that post until she garnered Senate approval to become our nation’s attorney general. She assumed that exalted post on April 27, 2015. At the UN a mere five months later, she revealed that her goal included having the SCN become“an alliance of nations” and a step toward building “a global community.”

Promoters of the SCN scheme insist that it isn’t a government body; it’s merely a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO), the designation awarded to many organizations by the UN. SCN’s initial step consists of linking city governments to the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), which will exert control over a city’s law-enforcement policy. Setting guidelines for police and working toward disarming civilians are its two main goals. This foreign-based group doesn’t hide its determination to grab the weapons of those who are classified Right-leaning.

Four American cities have already affiliated with SCN’s Institute for Strategic Dialogue. They are New York, Denver, Atlanta, and Minneapolis. Canada’s Montreal quickly followed them. These cities are now linked with European cities, where citizens labeled as members of the Right have already experienced the grab for personally owned weapons.

Board members of the ISD include England’s Baron Charles Guthrie, who is a Rothschild banker, a Trilateral Commission member, and a Bilderberg veteran. Another board member is American Dr. Gary Samore, a recent vice president of studies at the Council on Foreign Relations and a member of the world government-promoting seat of the establishment since 1998. Clearly, national sovereignty is the ISD’s ultimate target.

The four U.S. cities already ensnared by the SCN risk not only having their law-enforcement policies determined by the ISD, they also face the possibility of having foreign police in their cities, possibly even blue-helmeted enforcers from the United Nations. Creation of a global police force seems to be looming on the horizon.

One of the excuses for creation of the SCN is a need to aid local police forces to combat Islamic extremists. But the promoters of this dangerous scheme also claim that existing police work has to be performed without any targeting of the rights of Muslims. The Islamic terrorism already carried out is obviously a “crisis” that won’t be wasted.

This new venture by the world planners presents two threats. One is a backdoor plan to wrest control away from local police, and the other a new step in the direction of world government under the United Nations. Our “Support Your Local Police — And Keep Them Independent!” effort must continue to grow. And this SCN scheme constitutes one more reason why there is a need to Get US Out! of the United Nations.

So what to do about this latest threat to sovereignty? We urge that all who read this article contact your representative (202-225-3121) and senators (202-224-3121) by telephone. Politely ask that no federal funding be allowed for the Strong Cities Network. And point out that this newly created scheme will place the police forces of participating American cities under the control of an international organization.

Please also email your representative and senators with the same message.

Where appropriate, contact the officials of the four cities already involved in SCN. And certainly, if you learn of any plans to add more cities to the SCN, contact that city’s officials and urge them to avoid involvement in this new international program designed to destroy local control of police and grant additional power to the UN.

(This article was originally published under the title “A New Threat Aimed at Destroying Sovereignty” in the April 2016 JBS Bulletin.)

10 13 11 flagbar

UN Troops to Kill Americans Who Wont Give Up Their Guns

March 24th, 2016 by

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com

 

UN TROOPS TO KILL AMERICANS WHO WON’T GIVE UP THEIR GUNS 

By Dave Hodges

There is a crisis coming. A false flag of epic proportions. Trump will provide the background and the pretext. Gun confiscation, by the UN, will be taking place on US soil. It was practiced in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. They will show up at 3AM, kick in your door, seize your gun and kill you if you offer any kind of resistance. Follow the progression.

3-24-2016 11-52-53 AM

The UN will be the enforcement agency. Why do you think that Quayle, Hagmann and Hodges have talking to you about foreign troops training on our soil?

3-24-2016 11-54-30 AM

Don’t let this man take your gun.

He wants a third term.

 

We have been down this road before.

3-24-2016 11-55-47 AM

TROOPS ORDERED TO KILL ALL AMERICANS

WHO DO NOT TURN IN THEIR GUNS

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyfkQkchlu4

Published on Jul 16, 2012

http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-f
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/fr
http://www.infowars.com/army-manual-o
http://www.prisonplanet.com/army-cour...

“Complete disarmament” of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.comMonday, July 16, 2012

 

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell. Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.” Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.” Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”  While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN “peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.” 

“The  manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.

As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish — taking a huge bite out of the second amendment — is by no means far fetched.  After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

3-24-2016 11-56-52 AM

US State Department Memo validates all claims in this article.

This is where millions of you could spend your last days.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I can just hear the screams of joy coming out of the mouths of many of our dumbed down idiots, educated in our terrorist education system, and still convinced that Uncle Sam is taking care of them.

TOTAL ASSHOLES!

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 

 

 

 

FOR THOSE WHO DOUBT THE UNITED STATES IS INCORPORATED HERE IT IS RIGHT IN ITS OWN LAWS:

March 23rd, 2016 by

By Marilyn Barnewall

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

HERE’S THE LAW IN QUESTION:

Under title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 subsections 15 and 15(A), “United States” means — (A) a Federal corporation.” It is right in their laws!

HERE’S THE LINK TO TITLE 28 US CODE 3002 (SCROLL DOWN TO#15):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Most of us over the age of 10 remember our car trips cross-country; when you entered a city, it was clearly identified as being Incorporated by a sign at the city limits.  Cities are incorporated, the federal government is incorporated, each State is incorporated, and each County is incorporated, too.  Each Department within cities and counties is also incorporated… your courts, your libraries, your clerk and recorder, parks and recreation – all of them.  If they were not incorporated, it would be impossible for money to be transferred to any of them by the federally-incorporated United States, Inc.  This is not difficult to understand – I realize it is very difficult to believe. 

Anyone who understands Business 101 knows that corporations function from By-Laws, not from a Constitution with a Bill of Rights.  This is why we have unlawful Administrative Courts… Common Law cannot function and has no jurisdiction in the world of corporate law… and corporations are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which is a reflection of Maritime Law (which is why you see all of the flags in our courtrooms with gold trim on them… the American flag has no gold trim – even Dwight Eisenhower commented on this).

I hope you find this helpful.  MB 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I can forgive anyone for not taking my word on this subject, but you have to be completely brain dead not to take Marilyn’s word for it.

10 13 11 flagbar

STOP THE POLITICAL INDOCTRINATION OF AMERICAS CHILDREN

March 22nd, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Swanson/holly101.htm

By Holly Swanson

March 22, 2016

NewsWithViews.com

A subversive political movement has been quietly teaching their beliefs in many of our schools for years.

This movement is now taking steps to expand their reach by establishing a national political indoctrination program to impose their political agenda on students throughout the school system. This indoctrination program would reach children wherever they live and would include charter, private and home school situations.

History reminds us of what can happen when a political movement is allowed to use education as a tool to politically indoctrinate (brainwash) innocent children. Hindsight is 20/20. We have the choice, the power and the opportunity to learn, to take action and to stop the political indoctrination of our children.

The idea of No Child Left Inside is one of the main tools this movement is using to slip their agenda into our schools. Current steps and details regarding this agenda and how this movement is advancing their goals begin with the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act is the federal legislation that directs the course of elementary and secondary education in America. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act was recently reauthorized and the new version of this legislation is called the Every Student Succeeds Act (S.1177). The Every Student Succeeds Act was passed by the House on December 2, 2015, passed by the Senate on December 9, 2015 and signed into law by President Obama on December 10, 2015.

During the reauthorization process, key goals from another piece of legislation, the proposed No Child Left Inside Act of 2015, were inserted into the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) due to the efforts and influence of this political movement.

Congressman John Sarbanes, author of the No Child Left Inside Act, released a victory statement on December 2, 2015 regarding the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) which included the following:

The environmental education provision contained in ESSA comes from the No Child Left Inside Act (NCLI), a bipartisan bill authored by Congressman Sarbanes that is designed to enhance American students’ environmental literacy.”

No Child Left Inside Act goals for environmental education and environmental literacy have been inserted into this legislation, which enables this movement to create the false impression that 1) they have a federal mandate for states to teach this curriculum and, 2) the curriculum attached to teaching these subjects has been approved by Democrats and Republicans at the federal level. This movement also plans to acquire federal funds to execute their national plan to change our children’s beliefs while they are in school. Nothing is set in stone. Responsible action can be taken to derail this plan.

Curriculum Not Scrutinized:

In the rush to pass the Every Student Succeeds Act, the curriculum attached to teaching the No Child Left Inside goals for environmental education and environmental literacy was not thoroughly scrutinized to ensure the intended outcomes were understood and the content would not unfairly influence the education of America’s children.

No Child Left Inside Act: Imposing the Goals of a Political Movement

Congressman John Sarbanes has stated the No Child Left Inside Act “is the arm of an advocacy movement”. In other words, the No Child Left Inside Act is the arm of a political movement. This statement by Sarbanes confirms the purpose of this legislation and this curriculum is to impose the agenda of that movement in our schools and on our children. The following statement from the No Child Left Inside Act reveals how this movement is infusing their agenda into our schools:

Forty-eight States have developed, or are in the process of developing, environmental literacy plans to effectively integrate environmental education into the prekindergarten through grade 12 curriculum and ensure that students graduate from high school environmentally literate.”

How many people in those 48 states realize No Child Left Inside is “the arm” of a political movement and environmental literacy plans are being used to integrate the goals of that movement into our schools? Take away the environmental language and the political goals of this movement come to light:

1) target children in prekindergarten. Start molding the behavior of children attending preschool by using simple messages that align their little hearts and minds with this movement’s beliefs.

2) integrate the political goals of this movement into the curriculum as the way to a) teach the political beliefs of this movement as part of factual learning in multiple subject areas, b) require students to study those political beliefs from prekindergarten all the way through the 12th grade, c) pressure students to apply those political beliefs in school and in their personal lives, d) change the purpose of education and brainwash students to adopt those political beliefs and one political mindset.

3) ensure students graduate with this movement’s mindset by a) passing laws that force schools to teach this movement’s mindset as part of the curriculum and, b) creating a new subject area and a new graduation requirement based on this movement’s mindset. This plan would force students to learn this movement’s beliefs and demonstrate proficiency in this mindset in order to graduate. This also camouflages steps to politically indoctrinate our children, America’s future voters, to support the revolutionary goals of this movement.

This plan to target children, politicize the curriculum and brainwash students to adopt one political mindset, is how communist countries impose their political agenda and train students to submit to their one-way of thinking.

Many Americans, including supporters of environmental education, do not realize that this political movement has changed the meaning and the purpose of environmental education to advance a political agenda.

What is the End Game?

Congressman Sarbanes, author of the No Child Left Inside Act, is also a well known leader in the Education for Sustainability movement. Extensive documentation in the book Training for Treason confirms the beliefs and goals attached to environmental education and environmental literacy are directly aligned with the political agenda of the Education for Sustainability movement and that agenda mirrors Green Party goals and communism.

This is the political agenda of the movement behind environmental education. This movement is on a fast track to slip their communist model of education into place by making their political agenda, their definition of environmental literacy and environmental education, the new foundation of all learning and practice in America’s schools. Is this the purpose of American education?

We Have a Choice:

Environmental literacy plans (developed or being developed in 48 states) are a key part of this movement’s strategy. The purpose of convincing every state to adopt an environmental literacy plan is to 1) make this movement’s definition of environmental literacy the focus of education in every state, 2) use this movement’s definition of environmental literacy to establish graduation requirements, 3) use the school system in every state to establish a national political indoctrination program in short order.

The purpose of convincing each state to make environmental literacy a graduation requirement is to ensure no child in that state can graduate without learning this curriculum; including charter, private and home school students. The Oregon Environmental Literacy Plan is a good example of how the political beliefs of this movement are presented.

It is vitally important to understand, as Congressman Greg Walden points out in the following statement, we have a choice:

“Oregon’s classrooms are no place for politicized instruction of our children mandated by the federal government. Congress recently passed a new law, the Every Student Succeeds Act, to explicitly prevent the federal government from mandating or coercing states into adopting any standards or curriculum, including ‘environmental literacy.’ I will continue working to reduce the federal footprint in our schools and keep politically motivated teaching out of the classroom.” —Congressman Greg Walden (R-OR)

“Politicized instruction” and “politically motivated teaching” do not belong in our schools. We have the choice, the power and the opportunity to stop the political indoctrination of our children and return our schools to safe havens of learning.

The American standard of a politically neutral (party neutral) public education is an essential safeguard to free thought, individual freedom and the democratic process, and we must ensure that the education of America’s youth is not compromised to impose the agenda of any one party or movement.

A Presidential Issue:

Addressing the issue of political indoctrination in America’s schools ought to be one of the top issues in the Presidential race based on the revolutionary agenda of this political movement and, because the current administration and the US Department of Education are promoting ideas and curriculum that align with the agenda of this political movement. We need to know where the candidates running for national, state and local office stand on this issue.

Preserving free thought, individual freedom and the democratic process requires immediate and responsible steps to suspend, scrutinize and remove this movement’s politicized curriculum from our classrooms and from our schools. If we are not FOR political indoctrination then we need to work together and stop political indoctrination. This is a call to action.

To learn more about this issue get a copy of the book Training for Treason which contains extensive documentation regarding the political agenda of this movement. Click here to order.

© 2016 Holly Swanson – All Rights Reserved

To find out what you can do to help stop the indoctrination of America’s children contact We Choose Freedom at: wechoosefreedom@earthlink.net

Holly Swanson is a leading authority on the harmful political agenda of the Education for Sustainability movement. She is a national speaker; a frequent guest on regional and national talk radio and the author of the acclaimed books ‘Set Up & Sold Out’ and ‘Training for Treason’. Swanson is the founder and director of We Choose Freedom® and Operation Green Out!®.

E-Mail: wechoosefreedom@earthlink.net

10 13 11 flagbar

 


SEO Powered By SEOPressor