Log in



Archive for March, 2016

HOW THE CFR GLOBALIST CONSPIRATORS MISCALCULATED

March 31st, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Gonzalez/servando159.htm

PART 1

By Servando Gonzalez, Author of…
Psychological Warfare and the New World Order and I Dare Call It Treason, and the DVDs Treason in America and Partners in Treason.
February 29, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

Part One: The Internet

Currently, it has become obvious that the globalist conspirators’ juggernaut has stalled. According to their plans, by this time they would have already implemented their New Gay World Order on most of the planet. It is evident, however, that the globalist conspirators have lost the final, decisive battle and are now in a disorganized retreat. Even worse, they are losing the support of some of their more important allies.

Nevertheless, their calamitous failure also carries a great danger. As their past behavior indicates, they will resort to any measure that may guarantee their success. As the old Chinese saying goes, the worst part of the dragon is the tail.

Now, why such a calamitous failure? It seems that, in their arrogance, they failed to foresee the three factors that are currently threatening their carefully-conceived plans: the Internet, Putin’s new Russia, and Donald Trump. The conjunction of these three unexpected elements has become a force multiplier that is relentlessly tearing down the conspirators’ plans of global domination and enslavement.

So, lets begin this series in three parts by studying one of the key stumbling blocks in the globalist conspirators’ path to global control: the Internet.

The Internet

Recent mainstream press headlines are highly revealing:

“Would President Trump Kill Freedom of the Press?,” The Washington Post
“Donald Trump: What Can Stop Him?,” POLITICO Magazine
“It’s Not Too Late to Stop Donald Trump,” US News & World Report
“Inside the Republican Party’s Desperate Mission to Stop Trump,” The New York Times
“The Mainstream Media Should Stop Covering Donald Trump,” The Huffington Post
“Rivals Have Just Two Weeks to Stop Trump,” NBCNews
“What will it take to stop Donald Trump?,” The Guardian
“This might be the only way to stop Donald Trump,” The Washington Times
“Can Donald Trump Be Stopped?,” International Business Times

These headlines reveal a new phenomenon: the CFR-controlled mainstream press’ inability to control public opinion anymore. Finally, the supposedly conservative Fox News made the key question: “ Why Can’t the Media ‘Stop’ Trump?”

The answer is very simple: they can’t stop Trump because of the Internet.

To fully understand why the Internet has become one of the main factors working against the globalist conspirators plans it is necessary to know that, contrary to communists and fascists who rely on brute force to accomplish their plans — Chairman Mao said that political power comes from the barrel of a gun — the globalist conspirators follow the tactics of the British Fabians and Italian communist Antonio Gramsci.

The British Fabians advocate communism as conceived by Karl Marx, but, contrary to Marx, Lenin, Trotsky and other communist ideologues, they believed that the right way to do it was not by violent revolution but gradually, by infiltration, capturing the existing institutions from inside and putting them to work for their goals. This explains why the symbol of the Fabians is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.[1]

Antonio Gramsci was an Italian Communist who lived in the early 20th century. After visiting the Soviet Union, he realized that the best way to implement communism was not by coercion or brute force, but by influencing and shaping the domain of ideas. He called his system “cultural hegemony.” The main tool to change the prevailing ideas was by infiltrating the mainstream media, the schools and universities, in a way that is now known as the “culture wars.”

Very early in their criminal careers the Wall Street bankers realized that their best way to control people was by controlling their minds —what is now called “psychological warfare” or “PsyWar.” So, using their money and power they made a powerful grab to control the American mainstream press. This maneuver was kept secret, and we know about it thanks to a patriotic politician, Congressman Oscar Callaway, whose statement was included in the Congressional Record. Congressman Callaway’s statement is so important that I am quoting it in detail,

On March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.

These 12 men worked the problem out by selecting 170 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest newspapers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interest of the purchasers.

This policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served. The effectiveness of this scheme has been conclusively demonstrated by the character of stuff carried in the daily press throughout the country since March 1915. They have resorted to anything necessary to commercialize public sentiment and sandbag the national congress into making extravagant and wasteful appropriations for the Army and Navy under the false pretense that it was necessary. Their stock argument is that it is “patriotism.” They are playing on every prejudice and passion of the American people.[2]

In the same fashion, in the Introduction to a 1996 book by Carl Jensen, Walter Cronkite, a trusted secret CFR agent, wrote:

A handful of us determine what will be on the evening news broadcasts, or, for that matter, in the New York Times or Washington Post or Wall Street Journal. . . . Indeed it is a handful of us with this awesome power. . . . a strongly editorial power. . . . we must decide which news items out of hundreds available we are going to expose that day. And those [news stories] available to us already have been culled and re-culled by persons far outside our control.[3]

This almost total control of the U.S. mainstream press has continued almost uninterrupted to this day. Proof of this is that speaking at the Bilderberg meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany, June 5, 1991, CFR honcho David Rockefeller thanked the sycophantic press for doing a good job keeping the American people in the dark about the treasonous activities of the Wall Street bankers and other conspirators on the Council on Foreign relations.

We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, TIME Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.

Conveniently, David forgot to mention the key role of the CFR-controlled CIA in keeping the American sheeple disinformed. According to a critic,

About a third of the whole CIA budget went to media propaganda operations. …We’re talking about hundreds of millions of dollars a year just for that….. close to a billion dollars are being spent every year by the United States on secret propaganda.[4]

Actually, CFR members not only exert an almost total control over the U.S. mainstream media, particularly TV, national newspapers and magazines, and the book and film industries[5]— actually they own most of it[6]— and use their power to control public opinion into accepting the CFR’s traitorous anti-American policies.

As I mentioned above, the conspirators’ control has continued almost uninterrupted to the present day. And I emphasized “almost,” because a few years ago a new, unexpected medium, the Internet, started defying their control.

Despite all their power, however, the conspirators have not won the final battle — at least, not yet. The present economic crisis, which not only is economic, but also political, social, moral and ethical, has occurred at a time when a new pervasive medium of communication they cannot control, the Internet, is dangerously threatening their monopoly on the press.

This informational (and disinformational) tool took them by surprise and, after many unsuccessful attempts to control and infiltrate it, apparently they have reached some conclusions. First, they have realized that the internet is a medium too powerful to allow it to operate out of their control and, second, that because of some intrinsic characteristics of the Internet, it is almost impossible to control or censor it, therefore, they must have to destroy it, at least in the present free, open form.[7]

Moreover, new technologies such as low priced high-resolution video cameras, desktop film editing and print on demand publishing have allowed the people to break the CFR’s media monopoly. But all these new technologies would have amount to nothing without the power of the Internet to make their products accessible to the public.[8]

Finally, the CFR conspirators began to realize their big mistake: not having killed the Internet in the cradle. In 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared while appearing before a congressional committee the U.S. —actually the CFR conspirators —was losing the global information war. According to her:

We are in an information war and we are losing that war. Al Jazeera is winning, the Chinese have opened a global multi-language television network, the Russians have opened up an English-language network. I’ve seen it in a few countries, and it is quite instructive.[9]

Two years later, CFR agent Zbigniew Brzezinski confirmed Hillary’s fears. During a short interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle News on August 2013, former US National Security Adviser and Trilateral Commission co-founder Zbigniew Brzezinski commented on the growing inefficiency of their PsyWar against the people due to the increased political knowledge of the public.[10]

No wonder they are so scared.

Further proof that the conspirators fear the power of the Internet is the fact that senators John Rockefeller (CFR) and Olympia Snowe (CFR) have been working hard to give the President the power to shut down domestic Internet traffic during a “state of emergency.” To such effect they introduced a bill called the Cybersecurity Act of 2009. This Act establishes the Office of the National Cybersecurity Advisor —an arm of the executive branch that would have the power to monitor and control Internet traffic, allegedly to protect the country against threats to critical cyber infrastructure. As expected, the Act does not define what a critical information network or a cybersecurity emergency is. Those definitions would be left to the interpretation of the president’s CFR advisors.[11]

Nevertheless, some brainwashed Americans still believe that we have a free press in this country, and that reporters and journalists provide them objective information based on facts. They ignore, however, that they get most of their news (actually carefully manufactured disinformation) from CFR-controlled, highly biased television, newspapers and magazines.

On its part, the American left has rightly accused the CIA of using the U.S. mainstream press in constant PSYOPs to mold public opinion. This however, is not a figment of some leftists’ imagination. Some years ago, the CIA admitted having recruited more than 400 influential journalists who have secretly carried out assignments, from intelligence gathering to serving as go-betweens, inside at least 25 organizations of the U.S. mainstream media. Eventually, CIA assets in the American media included CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News and World Report, Reader’s Digest, The Miami Herald, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Hearst Newspapers, news agencies AP, UPI, Reuters, and more. Since then, the conspirators’ control over the U.S. mainstream media has increased.[12]

On the other hand, we know that the CIA is nothing but the covert action arm of the people who created it: the CFR globalist conspirators. Contrary to what many Americans still believe, the CIA has never working to protect the interest of the American people but of the oil magnates, Wall Street bankers and CEOs of transnational corporations ensconced at the Council on Foreign Relations.

True American patriots are using the Internet to awake the American people to the fact that our supposedly “representative government,” does not represent us anymore but the interests of Wall Street bankers, oil magnates, and CEOs of transnational corporations. And the true seat of this secret government is not in Washington, D.C., but the Harold Pratt House in Manhattan, headquarters of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The web is an excellent source of non-manipulated information — provided you know how to use it. In the first place because, due to its inherent characteristics, the Internet is an uncontrollable Hydra with innumerable heads the conspirators cannot control — the Internet is an offshoot of the Arpanet, a military communications decentralized nodular network designed to survive a full-scale nuclear attack on the U.S. Consequently, it the conspirators conclude that they cannot control the Internet, they will find a way to eliminate it.

Another reason why the Inernet is a good source of information is because, contrary to the traditional media, you have the capability to actively interact with it. The Internet has broken the conspirators’ control over the media. Successes like the 9/11 Truth, Ron Paul and Tea Party movements and the current Donald Trump phenomenon have been made possible only because of the Internet.

Even more important, the Internet has also enormously accelerated the speed dissemination information is disseminated. After more than half a century of the Pearl Harbor events, still most Americans believe the official lie. Thanks to the Internet, however, just less than ten years after the 9/11 events took place about a hundred million Americans don’t believe the cock-and-bull story given by the government as an explanation, and this speed is increasing by the day:[13]

Further proof that the globalist conspirators have lost their media monopoly is that, currently, sites like the WND, Drudge Report and Alex Jones’ InfoWars get more readers in a single day than the New York Times in a year. Actually, most Americans have reached the point where they question up-front any information appearing in the mainstream media. Other important site whose popularity is growing is NewsWithViews, a site devoted to articles with an in-depth analysis for a more politically sophisticated public.

In their arrogance, the CFR globalist conspirators totally miscalculated the power of the Internet. Currently, the Internet has become a key tool in commerce, banking, health, and almost in any field of human activity. They can’t control it and they cannot eliminate it. The Internet has become a major threat against their hegemony, and they don’t know what to do to eliminate it.

 

During a 1992 interview with journalist Sarah McLandon, George H.W. Bush shamelessly said: “Sarah, if the American people ever find out what we have done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us.”

Well, thanks mostly to the Internet the American people finally discovered most of what the Bushes and the Clintons have done, and they are very angry. Paradoxically, the only person who may solve this situation in civilized, peaceful way is their archenemy Donald Trump. Otherwise, if they eventually manage to get rid of Trump, enraged Americans wielding pitchforks will soon be knocking at their doors.[14]

 

Servando is the uthor of Psychological Warfare and the New World Order and I Dare Call It Treason, and the DVDs Treason in America and Partners in Treason, all of them available at NewsWithViews.

© 2016 Servando Gonzalez – All Rights Reserved

Footnotes:

  1. Dennis Cuddy, The Road to Socialism and the New World Order (Highland City, Florida: Florida Pro Family Forum, 2000).
    Congressional Record, vol. 54, February 9, 1917, p. 2947.
    3. Carl Jensen, Censored: The News That Didn’t Make the News—And Why (New York: Seven Stories Press, 1995).
    4. Testimony of Mr. William Schaap, attorney, military and intelligence specialization, co-publisher Covert Action Quarterly, on the role of the U.S. Government in the assassination of Martin Luther King MLK Conspiracy Trial Transcript – Volume 9 November 30, 1999. [Link]
    5. For a description of how the Wall Street Mafia controls the media, see Denis W. Mazzoco, Networks of Power: Corporate TV’s Threat to Democracy (Boston, Massachusetts: South End, 1994); and Michael Parenti, Inventing Reality: The Politics of Mass Media (New York: ST. Martin’s Press, 1986) Also, James R. Bennett, Control of the Media in the United States: An Annotated Bibliography (New York: Garland, 1992).
    6. Democrats believe that conservatives control the mainstream press, while Republicans claim that Democrats control it. Actually, both are right. CFR Liberals control the press, but it is owned by CFR Conservatives, which shows that there is not a dime of difference between both sides of the Repucratic party coin.
    7. See, Servando Gonzalez, “Kiss Your Internet Goodbye,” NewsWithViews.com, April 6, 2003.
    8. One of the very few who have fully realized the power of the new media in Donald Trump. More on this in the third article of this series.
    9. See, “Hillary Clinton declares international information war,” RT, March 2, 2011.
    10. See, “Brzezinski: ‘Global Political Awakening’ Making Syrian War Difficult,” Storyleak.com, August 29, 2013.
    11. Steve Aquino, “Should Obama Control the Internet? A new bill would give the President emergency authority to halt web traffic and access private data,” Mother Jones, April 2, 2009
    12. Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the Media,” Rolling Stone, October 20, 1977.
    13. Just a few hours after the mainstream press gave the news about the strange death of Justice Scalia, other radically different interpretations began circulating the Internet.
    14. See, Servando Gonzalez, “And Now … It’s Pitchfork Time,” August 1, 2015.

Servando Gonzalez, is a Cuban-born American writer, historian, semiologist and intelligence analyst. He has written books, essays and articles on Latin American history, intelligence, espionage, and semiotics. Servando is the author of Historia herética de la revolución fidelista, Observando, The Secret Fidel Castro: Deconstructing the Symbol, The Nuclear Deception: Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban Missile Crisis and La madre de todas las conspiraciones: Una novela de ideas subversivas, all available at Amazon.com.

He also hosted the documentaries Treason in America: The Council on Foreign Relations and Partners in Treason: The CFR-CIA-Castro Connection, produced by Xzault Media Group of San Leandro, California, both available at the author’s site at http://www.servandogonzalez.org.

His book, Psychological Warfare and the New World Order: The Secret War Against the American People is available at Amazon.com. Or download a .pdf copy of the book you can read on your computer, iPad, Nook, Kindle or any other tablet. His book, OBAMANIA: The New Puppet and His Masters, is available at Amazon.com. Servando’s book (in Spanish) La CIA, Fidel Castro, el Bogotazo y el Nuevo Orden Mundial, is available at Amazon.com and other bookstores online.

His most recent book, I Dare Call It treason: The Council on Foreign Relations and the Betrayal of the America, just appeared and is available at Amazon.com and other bookstores online.

Servando’s two most recent books in digital versions only are The Swastika and the Nazis: A Study of the Misuse of the Swastika by the Nazis and the first issue of the political satire series OBSERVANDO: American Inventors.

Website: www.servandogonzalez.org

E-Mail: servandoglez05(at)yahoo(dot)com

10 13 11 flagbar

 

First Decentralized Eco-Friendly Crypto Currency EDRC Debuts

March 30th, 2016 by

https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/03/29/first-decentralized-eco-friendly-crypto-currency-edrc-debuts/

3-30-2016 11-18-11 AM

Written By: Newsfactor March 29, 2016

TN Note: Necessity is the mother of invention. As calls for a cashless banking system increase, entrepreneurs are rushing to fill the void. Bitcoin is energy intensive to create. The answer to that is this “Ec0-Friendly” blockchain crypto-currency. ERDC is not the end of the invention, as many others are throwing new products into the mix. In the end, it is almost certain that some major central bank (e.g, Bank of England) will enter the game by acquiring another currency company, or inventing a new crypto-currency of its own. If the central banking system controls such a currency, it will spell the end of commercial banks throughout the world.

First Decentralized Eco-friendly Crypto Currency EDRC to Change World of Money for the Better — Blockchain has launched the first decentralized eco-friendly crypto currency EDRCoin. It is based on USA-Dollar rate and can be used for transaction of goods and services all over the world

The fast evolving world of crypto currency is reportedly buzzing with the latest launch of first decentralized eco-friendly crypto currency EDRCoin. Developed by Blockchain, the futuristic currency is aimed to change the world of money for better.

With its costs based on the value of USA-Dollar rate (1EDRC =$1), EDRC can be deployed for internet shopping, virtual game payments and for the transaction of goods and services in any country.

“We are glad to announce the launch of our latest crypto currency EDRC which is going to add a new positive dimension to the world of money. The advanced decentralized crypto currency is themed on a green mining principle that banks on sustainable energy-efficient policies for generating money”, smiled one of the chief spokespersons from Blockchain.

Esteemed philanthropist and business tycoon Charles Chen partnered up with Marco A. Fernandez, a long-term IT entrepreneur, to develop and co-found EDRC.The main objective behind EDRC is the creation of a general-purpose payment system and steady exchange rate, themed on USA-Dollar rate- with due regard to the environment.

“While the regular cryptocurrencies unmindfully destroy the earth’s ecology with their mining operations, EDRC is careful about protection of natural resources. Our unique technology takes to utilization of alternate energy like solar panels and we make sure to leave no carbon footprint on Mother Nature.”

EDRC’s eco-friendly operations are carried in collaboration with independent private farms situated in different parts of the globe. 7 percent of the income generated from EDRC system would be utilized for the restoration of mangrove forests in Asia and the development of new solar panels.

Based of PoS (Proof-of-Stake) method, EDRC uses Skrypt function for hashing.

“Our developers have considered the issue of hacking attacks common with POW-based existent digital money and addressed all such flaws with the new advanced EDRC. Our cutting edge crypto currency assures complete credibility and solid protection from any external attack, theft or hacking invasions. To ensure complete security, user’s personal and financial data would be kept private.” explained the Blockchain manager.

EDRC mining is ongoing and would supposedly complete by 31st December, 2017, with the release of around 22 million coins.

“As our PoS system capitalizes on the users owning coins to validate the transactions, one transaction per day would be rewarded by an increment of 0.35 percent of the wallet-total. EDRCoins are immaterial & follows a purely mathematical approach that works with digital code.”

Speaking further, the manager emphasized on an edgy feature of EDRC that allows seamless number of accounts for creating and mining. Given its decentralized structure and antitrust philosophy, EDRC mining is guarded from artificial increment of cryptocurrency number. The banking system cannot exert any control on EDRC mining and hence can’t affect its value and quantity.

“EDRC is the best thing from the contemporary financial world. Join the EDRC community now for a welcome change in the perception of money”, the manager added in.

Blockchain was founded in 2015 by Hong-Kong businessman Charles Chen and Marco A. Fernandez, long-term IT entrepreneur, with the goal to improve our planet’s health through the development of an environment-friendly digital currency.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

If this isn’t a crock of shit, I’ve never smelled one. These slimy bastards are only interested in doing one thing; centralizing the possession of wealth! Anyone stupid enough to believe that electronic currency is safe from hacking has shit for brains.

Give me the power to create a nations currency, and I care not what their laws are.

Lucifer Rothschild!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh6lvY_T82I

10 13 11 flagbar

WHAT WOULD LIFE BE LIKE WITHOUT TOILET PAPER

March 29th, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Ewart/ron244.htm

3-29-2016 9-29-33 AM

By Ron Ewart

NewsWithViews.com

Forgive us for entering into a subject that is best left in the bathroom, but without certain items of biological comfort we could be sent back to the dark days of outhouses and Sears catalogues. With the insanity that is radical environmentalism aside, our lifestyle and its comforts are a direct result of industrial ingenuity in turning trees (a renewable resource) into highly useful paper products from toilet and computer paper, to feminine napkins, Scot towels, packaging and grocery bags, etc., each product making our lives a little easier. Industry keeps coming up with new ideas to turn trees into paper, in all of its various forms. Of course, there are always the 22-year old brain-dead actresses telling us we can get along with one square per event. Obviously she never had a ………………………….., Never mind, we won’t go there.

But oh my God! When you make paper from trees it takes energy and in the process that evil CO2 is emitted. And of course we have to kill the trees to make the paper. That’s bad. But even worse is that we reduce the absorption of CO2 by removing the trees as well, except that we can re-plant trees. That’s why trees are a renewable resource.

Obviously, we must be killing the planet by our hedonistic lifestyle of greed and avarice, especially those rich Americans, and this practice must be brought to a halt immediately to save the planet. The environmentalists and the government tell us it is so and they have brainwashed millions of Americans (including our young school children) into believing it is true, except for a couple of little scientific “things” that the government and the radical environmentalists choose to ignore to promote their green agenda.

Two of these scientific “things” come to mind. CO2 (carbon dioxide) is heavier than air. CO2 sinks. It is a fact of physics. Yes, a small portion of CO2 that doesn’t sink to the ground to feed the trees, plants and plankton, ends up in the upper atmosphere due to churning, but a very tiny portion. Of all of the greenhouse gases, CO2 makes up 0.177%. But what is even more striking in these statistics is that the CO2, supposedly caused by man, is a small fraction of that 0.117%. In fact, the greatest greenhouse gas (95%), over which man has absolutely no control, is water vapor and obviously has the greatest effect on planet warming, or cooling as the case may be, if any, not withstanding the effects of that giant yellow orb in the sky.

So the government and the radical environmentalists would have us believe that a miniscule fraction of a gas, that is heavier than air, a gas that all living things on this planet could not survive without, is somehow heating our planet into a runaway global warming event and we are all going to die or drown, if we don’t repent to the God of Green! If you believe this poppy cock, we question your intellect.

The environmentalists and thus the government, don’t want us to drill for oil anywhere in the U. S., or won’t let us build any new pipelines, power plants, refineries, or dams. Meanwhile, other countries, like China and India are exploiting their sources of energy every day, in spite of their greenhouse gas emissions. But these same insane folks who run our asylum called a government, want to lock up as much of our land as possible from livestock (food), resource extraction (minerals, oil and trees) and people. They then implemented by law, the positively outrageous and questionable practice of turning our food into fuel, (ethanol from corn – Sorry Iowans) thereby driving up the price of almost every food group. Anyone with half a brain could see this coming 30 years ago. Some did and warned us, but the warnings went unheeded.

Let’s follow these events to their illogical and deleterious conclusion. Crude oil is the very foundation of the energy that powers our civilization in the western world. Just about everything is affected by the cost and availability of crude oil. A large fraction of crude goes into the production of fuel for cars, trucks, airplanes, ships and heating our homes and businesses. The rest goes into the production of plastics, paints and resins and many other products, you know, like nylons for women.

Transportation and the infrastructure that supports transportation, is absolutely vital to the distribution of every product we buy or sell, including food. If trucks and trains don’t roll and ships don’t ply the open seas, Albertson’s, Safeway, QFC, Costco, Fred Meyer and a host of other retailers and big box stores don’t get products to sell to you. Have you ever thought of where you will get your food, if your local grocery store’s shelves are empty? Perhaps from your neighbor at the point of a gun, if he has any food and if government hasn’t taken away your guns.

Food is kind of important to survival you know. Some think that if you can’t buy it, then you will have to take it by force. Now of course in such a scenario, your benevolent government would step in, declare martial law, nationalize all food production and distribution and ration it out as they see fit. Do you want to be at the end of the long line of how the government sees fit? How easy it is to control people when you own food and energy production. Could that be our future? Many think it is.

But this all fits a very evil pattern, driven by international environmentalists, one-world-order types, and the United Nations and Europe, in their eternal quest to bring the United States down to a third-world country by re-distribution of our wealth, our property rights and the destruction of our freedom. By driving up the price of everything, the thinking of governments and the radical environmentalists is that you will use less of things and move into cities where you won’t have to drive as far for your food or work and where you are much easier to control by government. And of course they are encouraging you to bicycle, walk, or take mass transit. It’s good for your health you know and the government and the radical environmentalists are very concerned about your health. Hardly!

If the environmentalists and the government succeed in taking away, or outlawing, crude oil and trees, we will be driven back into those days of outhouses, palm leaves and candles. We covered this possible outcome in our fiction story of Jeremy’s one day in the future. The article starts out:

“Jeremy huddled in a corner of the old log cabin, out of the wind, even though it blew through the cracks in the walls and whistled and moaned with a haunting, bone-chilling sound. The sky was dark, gray and menacing. The coming twilight filled him with dread. There would be no artificial light for the approaching darkness and he tried not to think of the long night ahead.”

“Our own oil, coal and natural gas resources had been shut off by the environmentalists and the Obama administration. The entire energy infrastructure had fallen into disrepair. Oil, gas and coal companies had shut their doors because of too many restrictions and exorbitant emission taxes. The wind and solar power that Obama promised would replace fossil fuels, was just one of his worthless, but very expensive pipe dreams, like so many other socialist and radical environmental policies he implemented. Power plants quit running for lack of transportation, energy resources and maintenance personnel. The power grid was ravaged by neglect, natural forces and frequent domestic and foreign terrorist attacks. But that was of no consequence. There was no power to distribute to the grid.”

Read the rest of the story HERE.

Throughout history dictators have herded the people out of the countryside and into large cities where they can be controlled to a much higher degree. Remember the Nazi’s Warsaw ghetto? A dictator’s, or a liberal president’s worst enemy is a freethinking rural landowner, who just might start a revolution.

So the next time you have the opportunity to send a donation to an environmental group, or vote for a politician that will do whatever the environmentalists or socialists want them to do, think twice, or maybe four times. You could be funding and voting for your own demise, not to mention the high possibility of losing your freedom and control over life-sustaining food and toilet paper. Right now government controls your money, your land, your water, your food, your energy and your health care. What’s left?

WE THE PEOPLE have a choice, either become the CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED again, or be slaves to the GOVERNMENT, where they take your money, your land, your health care and control the distribution of your food and energy.

Imagine what the world would be like if there were no toilet paper, or worse, no food at your local grocery store. A hungry belly has nothing to lose by stealing, looting, killing, or going to war. It is happening in many parts of the world right now. And don’t be fooled. It can happen here!

People who fail or refuse to confront and stop tyranny, are destined to be enslaved by it.

But then, who is going to lift a finger to stop the socialists, the environmentalists and the one-world-order types? Americans could stop this freedom-robbing madness within a few years if there were enough people willing to act and enough money to fund their efforts. Sadly, out of 320,000,000 people and the richest nation on earth, there is neither ….. at least not now. Evidently, things just aren’t bad enough yet, even though half the people are living off the sweat, blood and tears of the other half and the former half get to vote to force the latter half to pay. One hundred years ago, that egregious injustice would have ignited a revolution. But not today where we live in a cesspool of political correctness, irrational compassion, radical environmentalism, multi-culturalism and the liberty-starving ideology of social justice.

[NOTE: The forgoing article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the opinion of NewsWithViews.com, it’s employees, representatives, or other contributing writers.]

© 2016 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved

  Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, “In Defense of Rural America”, is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) (http://www.narlo.org) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State, an advocate and consultant for urban and rural landowners. He can be reached for comment at info@narlo.org.

Website: www.narlo.org

E-Mail: info@narlo.org

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I don’t care what any body say’s; for good old fashion satire, or down right sarcastic vitriol you simply cannot beat Ron Ewart. Ron, you have my admiration and make me jealous, but I love ya.

10 13 11 flagbar

AMERICAN MATRIX HOW WE LOST OUR CONSTITUTION PART 1 & 2

March 28th, 2016 by

http://newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilyn205.htm

3-27-2016 1-48-28 PMTHE U.S. CIVIL FLAG

By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
January 13, 2015
NewsWithViews.com Archives http://www.newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilynA.htm

Do you want your Constitutional Republic back? If so, this article provides you with information that will help you achieve that objective. It won’t come through Constitutional Conventions, Conventions of the States, or memorizing the Constitution and going to court with constitutional arguments in a court system the jurisdiction for which functions under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and Maritime Law.

Your Constitutions (national and state) have been put in hibernation and are brought out like the good silver… only when needed to make an impression or to be used in self defense for crimes committed against the people by those in government who are supposed to serve us.
Some questions for you:

  1. Are you aware that the United States is incorporated? No, this article isn’t about Strawmen or your name being in CAPITAL letters on all legal documents like your birth certificate, driver’s license, Social Security Card, Passport, etc. There is the United States of America and there is the United States of America, Inc. There is a good reason for what happened and it does not involve the bankruptcy of this nation.
  2. Are you aware that the state in which you live is incorporated? All 50 states are incorporated. Read on and I’ll provide you with absolute evidence… not opinion, but evidence.
  3. Are you aware that your county is incorporated?
  4. Are you aware that your city (or township) is incorporated? (Most of us are aware of city incorporations.)
  5. Are you aware that most departments within your city and county are incorporated? Yes, I mean the Sheriff’s Department, the Police Department, the City and County and State Courts (even your State Supreme Court), the Public Library, the Public Works Department, the Department of Education and the County Clerk? Almost every department in your city and county is incorporated. I must admit, this disclosure surprised me more than the others. Even more interesting, most people who staff these departments – including county commissioners, sheriffs, librarians, police chiefs, and other department heads – appear, as I was, unaware of the corporate status of their “departments.”

Here’s a link to my County Sheriff’s office. Notice that it is registered as a “privately held company.” The name listed, Stan Hilkey, was the Sheriff of Mesa County at the time I downloaded the information a couple of months ago. Look your own county Sheriff up on Manta.com and see if your law enforcement is incorporated. My county courts are also incorporated. Are yours? To prove it’s not just a Colorado thing, here’s a link to Alabama’s courts as listed at Manta.com. Look yours up… my bet is that they are also incorporated.

6. Are you aware that corporations are run under the jurisdiction of Statutory Law, not Constitutional or Common Law? Are you aware that Articles of Incorporation based on the policies and regulations in place in all 50 States are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code and/or Maritime Law which are the basis of Statutory Law?

In other words, when wearing their corporate hats (which is whenever it is to their advantage to do so), our federal, state, county, and city governments and the departments contained within them must comply with the policies of the Uniform Commercial Code, not with the Constitution of the United States or your State Constitution. The courts, too, are incorporated. No wonder we see so little Constitutional or Common Law in our courts! No wonder administrative law judges can make the law up as a trial proceeds (or so it appears to those thinking the jurisdiction under which courts function is Constitutional or Common Law)!

This information should answer the questions of many Americans who wander around shaking their heads trying to figure out why our courts are making the insane, unconstitutional decisions that spew out of them like the Devil’s bad breath. The Courts are incorporated and comply with the requirements of Statutory Law based on the policies and procedures dictated by the Uniform Commercial Code or Maritime Law, not the United States Constitution or your State’s Constitution.

People look at their small town police departments being equipped as if they are General Patton in the 1940’s powering his way through Germany and wonder why Humvees and SWAT teams are needed to protect them. Who – or what – are they really protecting?

And it goes beyond our police departments and sheriffs’ offices to our courts and schools and property taxes… and everything else.

You need to know whether what I’m saying is true or false. Go to Manta.com and look up your own state, county and city. Especially look at the departments within your city and county… your fire, sheriff and police departments, your county clerk, the State and County Courts, etc.

Why is this information critical if we are to understand why America is in many cases functioning in a way designed to destroy Her? Why is it “dangerous” information?

The answer is direct and simple: CORPORATIONS (INCLUDING GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS) DO NOT FUNCTION UNDER A CONSTITUTION. THEY FUNCTION UNDER ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO BUSINESS LAWS OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND MARITIME LAW, NOT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. EVEN MORE IMPORTANT, CORPORATIONS CAN BE DISSOLVED! THAT IS THE BIGGEST DANGER OF THE PEOPLE BECOMING AWARE OF THIS INFORMATION. THE CORPORATE STRUCTURE THEY HAVE BUILT TO REMOVE OUR ACCESS TO CONSTITUTIONAL AND COMMON LAW IN OUR COURTS CAN, LIKE ANY CORPORATION, BE DISSOLVED. IT IS, PERHAPS, THEIR ACHILLES HEEL – their greatest weakness! We, the People, CAN DISSOLVE THEM!

The corporations cannot be dissolved by the government employees who work for them; they must be dissolved by the people. How? County by county. These corporations were imposed from the top down and the only way to disassemble them is from the bottom up. Carry a petition. Get the required number of signatures and get it on your county ballot next election. The initiative should say something like “No government entity in _____ County shall incorporate or be incorporated. All government agencies, divisions and departments must function under the legal jurisdiction of the Constitution of the State of _____ and be subject to the limits imposed on government by the Constitution of the United States and the State of _______.” I’m not a lawyer and I’m sure you can get a stronger statement from an attorney experienced at writing ballot initiatives.

As I will point out in Part II of this article, liberty is not free and if you want your constitutional rights restored, it will require some long-term planning and changes in the way county costs are defined and financed… but it can be done! If you would rather our cost of liberty and constitutional rights be paid via budgeting and taxation instead of young men and women being unnecessarily killed and maimed in unlawful, unconstitutional wars, you will help dissolve the government corporations that help make such tragedies possible.

I must admit, I am surprised this material has been around as long as it has and none of the many lawyers who have been exposed to it had a light go off in their heads saying “Corporations do not function under Constitutional Law which is why Americans are being abused by their courts — and corporations can be dissolved, SO LET’S DISSOLVE THEM!.”

You can logically assume that if your city/township, county, state, and federal governments are incorporated, they do not function under the aegis (protection) of a Constitution of any kind. They function under the rules and regulations of the Uniform Commercial Code. The law and how we lost the jurisdictional protection of Common and Constitutional law is the topic of Part II of this article.

Do you now understand why your courts and law enforcement officials do not act in accordance with the limits placed on government by the United States Constitution – or, even more important, your State’s Constitution?

In the past month, I’ve been to two meetings about jurisdictional law given by experts on Constitutional law. Both were very good… both speakers were quick to point out the rights God grants each of us and the limits on government guaranteed under the Constitution. Neither realized that the constitutional rights of the people are being badly abused because of the corporate status of federal, state, county, city governments and most of the departments that function under those entities and thus do not answer to Federal and State Constitutions. Neither speaker realized that corporations are under the jurisdiction of Statutory or business law – the Uniform Commercial Code/Maritime Law. It raises a difficult question for constitutional experts: If the various governments, including our courts, function under the jurisdiction of the Uniform Commercial Code rather than the Constitution, how important is a Constitution that has been hi-jacked?

Before moving on to Part II of this article which will explain the kinds of jurisdictional law being practiced in American courts, I want to provide you what I promised. Evidence.

It’s time to stop speculating about issues, wondering (what a waste of time) if this crisis or that one is a false flag. “They” rely on chaos to keep you off balance because only by keeping you off balance can they take their next unlawful step designed to eliminate the asset singly responsible for preventing socialism or communism in America’s capitalist economy: The middle class. They throw one issue after another at you… from amnesty to police brutality; from shopping center shootings to elementary school shootings to shootings of police officers sitting innocently in their car. They take you from one false flag to another. They throw one war after another at you… or threaten a new war. As the manipulation of gold was used to cause the Great Depression of the early 1900’s, they use the new gold – oil – to manipulate this even Greater Depression.

They can call it a recession all they want, but the only reason people are not standing in food lines as they did in the 1930s is food stamps. They called the job creation programs of the Great Depression the Work(s) Progress Administration (WPA). In the 30s, cities all over the country got new parks and recreation facilities, bridges were built as were schools and highways… the work of the WPA. It provided jobs for the unemployed. For this current Greater Depression it is called “shovel ready jobs.”

When they hire a new government employee, it depletes the tax base rather than adding to it, so new government hires cannot be categorized as “new jobs” produced by the economy. But the Obama Administration needs to look like it is doing SOMETHING right, so they “create” new jobs by funding them via private sector contractor work projects. Then they can be counted as new jobs… just as Franklin Delano Roosevelt did with WPA jobs – but government, not a thriving free marketplace, is paying for these “new jobs.” Regardless of stock market ups and downs, the marketplace is not thriving. It is being manipulated.

I believe the core problem centers on the incorporation of every federal, state, and county and all of the departments within each and the resulting system that had to be built to support itself. Logic tells me that if we get rid of the corporations, we remove their ability to manipulate our courts and all government offices with no personal accountability. I believe if we take action while we still can, we can retrieve our nation from what the international central banking system has thrown in the trash bin of history without first ensuring the corpse is dead.

If I’m correct, this is not only the most important article I’ve ever written for any news publication, it is also one of the most important articles you will ever read. It’s also the most dangerous… for me, at least – and for Paul Walter, the publisher of NewsWithViews.com.

Why is it dangerous? Because it offers a solution to the conundrum (unsolvable puzzle) “they” have created. Over a long period of time (it began in the late 1800s), “they” created the conundrum to give them sufficient time to globally enslave all but the elitists. The same techniques if not the same programs are being used around the world. The objective? Global government composed of oligarchies (an elite class and a labor class – no middle class) worldwide.

Manta.com is a Web site that provides corporate information. It costs a few hundred dollars to be a member of Dunn & Bradstreet – and when I owned my own company, I was a member. I no longer am. So, I use Manta.com because it’s free. Manta provides the names of about 40 million for-profit private companies – including government.

Here is a Manta.com copy of a listing for the State of Colorado.

3-28-2016 10-58-04 AM

If you look at the bottom of the Manta form, you’ll see that Democrat Governor Hickenlooper is referenced as Colorado’s CEO rather than the State’s Governor. Why? Just as corporations do not run on Constitutional law, neither do corporations have Governors. They have Chief Executive Officers. Or, they have Managers… check out California’s Governor, Jerry Brown. Manta.com lists him as California’s “Manager” and California is “A privately held company in Sacramento, CA.”

Here’s more evidence of the incorporation of America’s sovereign states and their cities and counties.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is, like Hickenlooper, listed as that state’s Chief Executive Officer. On the Walker link to Wisconsin’s Washington, D.C. Executive Office (why do Governors need offices in D.C.? – because their state is incorporated there and a corporation needs an office in the location of incorporation), scroll down and look at the Washington, D.C. Executive Office for the State of New York. Wisconsin and New York are on the same page. This particular link tells you that the State of New York is incorporated in the District of Columbia and that Derek Douglas is the Manager of the Washington, D.C. office, not the Governor. I researched Douglas, wondering why he is listed as the Washington, D.C.-based New York Governor’s Office Manager. I found a Press Release from the White House stating that Derek Douglas was an urban affairs special assistant to the President of the United States.

Maryland’s Executive Office D.C. listing shows its State of Incorporation as the District of Columbia. Does it surprise you to learn that Governors have Executive Offices located in the District of Columbia? New York is just one example. Go here to find the D.C. Executive Offices for Pennsylvania, Iowa, Florida, Wisconsin, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Idaho, California, Delaware, and Oregon. This article provides too little space to list all 50, but they are there. Here’s the link for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

I said our cities and counties have been incorporated. Here is the Manta.com listing for the City of Birmingham, Alabama. State of Incorporation is Alabama… the city IS incorporated. Most of us know that cities are incorporated. Most of us did not know that our counties are incorporated and that almost every department and division within our incorporated cities and counties are incorporated, too.

For many years, people have talked about government Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports (CAFRs) and have tried to find where the CAFR funds are hidden. Where in the world could “they” be hiding them? The federal, state, county and city corporations would be a good guess. No one knows about them.

Did I mention that each of these entities has two identities? There is, for example, the State of Colorado – and there is the State of Colorado, Inc. There is a County of Denver – and there is a Denver County, Inc., etc. They cannot drop the Constitutional identity because if they do, they lose “We, the People…” who didn’t volunteer to be part of their corporation. Thus, it appears every government, no matter how large or how small, in the country has dual identities, one incorporated and one unincorporated.

Here are some Manta.com links you can use to start doing your own research. When you find your Sheriff’s Department is incorporated, when you find your local Courts are incorporated, you might just want to start carrying a petition to get signatures demanding a vote of the people to dissolve all government corporations within your county and demand that they function under your State Constitution rather than under Statutory Jurisdiction which offers citizens no Constitutional protections from government usurpation of the power of individual citizens. It will surprise only a few to learn in Part II of this article that it all began with the Federal Reserve System.

Or you can contact any of the 374 veterans organizations listed as companies by the Federal Government. Now we know how they could withhold medical benefits from our veterans. We know why no one who participated in withholding the medical services from dying men and women entitled to those services was terminated from government payrolls: They were wearing their corporate hats.

Here are links to some Manta.com veterans’ listings (you usually have to scroll to the bottom of the page to get what you want… not all listings about veterans involve government agencies like the Veterans Administration; Manta lists private companies that deal with veterans, too).

Dunn & Bradstreet is the official organization that registers and keeps track of American business credit ratings. They assign DUNS code numbers so corporate credit ratings can be found by lenders or other creditors when companies apply for credit. Below, you will find the DUNS code number for your state and its largest city.

Below are the Dunn & Bradstreet numbers assigned to some federal government offices. After the federal government listings, every state and its largest population center DUNS data is provided. The DUNS numbers are not the result of my own research — the Manta.com material is data I have been personally researching since last summer. The DUNS numbers have been listed on the Internet since February 2013, but I have been unable to find the person who did all of this work. I will say the Louisiana and Tennessee numbers appear incorrect (all have 9 numbers assigned except these two). As a non Dunn & Bradstreet member, I have no way to go to the D&B site and verify them but hope they will be helpful to you.

3-28-2016 11-01-36 AMThis list creates a lot of interesting questions. For example, why does the U.S. Internal Revenue Service need a DUNs number – unless it is incorporated? Looking at the above list of departments within the U.S. Government, does it give you any insight to how “they” get away with the VA scandal, Fast and Furious guns across the border, Benghazi, the IRS discrimination against conservative groups applying for tax exempt status? Relative to the law, corporations are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (or the Law of the Seas – sometimes called Maritime Law). They have no obligation to protect anyone’s Constitutional rights when functioning under their corporate hats – and they keep the Constitutional hat available in case they get caught and need to declare their Constitutional rights to certain protections – like Lois Lerner’s use of the Fifth Amendment when she testified before Congress. Perhaps that explains the smirk on her face during that proceeding?

Remember the controversy about Lerner’s appearance before the Senate Committee before which she testified? “She can’t make a statement pronouncing her innocence and then declare her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid answering questions about her possible guilt! That’s against the law!” That’s what every constitutional law expert said… and had she been functioning under the Constitution, they would have been correct.

When she made her statement, she was wearing her corporate hat. When she declared her rights under the Constitution, she was wearing her constitutional hat. It is the best possible example I can give you about why they need to maintain their rights under BOTH the Constitution and the Corporations for which they work. The Constitution gives them protections from personal liability they would not otherwise have.

Here is the Dunn & Bradstreet listing of numbers assigned to cities and states:

3-28-2016 11-03-01 AM3-28-2016 11-03-47 AM3-28-2016 11-04-37 AMPart II of this article will explain how America’s laws morphed from Constitutional to Statutory law. It involves debt (and explains why Congress is so adamantly tied to ever increasing and ongoing debt). [The book: The Coming Battle, published in 1899, documents how the politicians of that period didn’t want the debt to be paid off. They wanted the debt to be rolled over from generation to generation. It continues to this day. It’s a must read.]

Click here for part —–> 2, OR SCROLL DOWN

© 2015 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

 

AMERICAN MATRIX: HOW WE LOST OUR CONSTITUTION
PART 2

http://newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilyn206.htm

By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
January 16, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

COLORABLE MONEY, COLORABLE LAW, COLORABLE LIBERTY

Before providing you with the following information, I must state that I am not an attorney and have not studied the law. I’m a retired banker who has done a lot of research on this subject.

What we learned in Part I is that federal, state, county and city governments and most of the departments and divisions that are part of them are incorporated. We learned that corporations function under Articles of Incorporation, not a Constitution and that’s how we lost our constitutional rights and courts that support them.

We learned that corporations are governed by business laws having to do with Maritime Law (also called Law of the Seas or Admiralty Law both of which are historically very old) and the Uniform Commercial Code. We learned that Constitutional Law is based on Common Law (which is based on substance and the will of the people — the Will of God, too, many people say). For example, under Common Law we are provided the alternative of not testifying against ourselves; that is not part of Maritime Law.

To understand the damage that has been done to our nation, we need to define the word “colorable” – its meaning, its impact on our currency, our courts, and our constitutional liberties and the limits the Constitution places on government. It is from the meaning of the word “colorable” that the virus of death infecting our nation breeds and keeps breeding… like Ebola, it dissolves every major life-giving organ in its path until death ensues.

COLORABLE MONEY – COLORABLE COURTS

To be “colorable,” is for something to appear to be what it is not. It looks real, you are told by your government that it is real and, in the example of currency, it is used or behaves as if it’s real, but it is not. Take what you are told is a dollar bill from your billfold. It looks like a dollar bill. You can spend it like a dollar bill. But it is not a dollar bill. It is a Federal Reserve Note. It says so, right on the face of it – at the top, above George Washington’s picture.

In the world of banking, what is a note? Answer: It is a loan. It is credit. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, fiat money has no value in and of itself, but it can be exchanged… like Monopoly money. A direct quote from the Minneapolis Fed: …(fiat currency can be exchanged) “for goods and services… because (the people) are confident it will be honored when they buy goods and services.”

Money and currency are not the same. We used to have money in America but when the dollar was no longer backed by gold or silver our “money” became a fiat currency. These things called a “Federal Reserve Note” became colorable currency, something that behaved like money because people could use it to buy groceries, cars, electronics, etc., and also pay for services like health care and life insurance. But it was not money. It was colorable… it just serves as a paper currency. Money is something of substance – like gold or silver. For Common Law to exist, money of substance must exist.

If a (colorable) Federal Reserve Note becomes part of a contract, the contract also becomes colorable. Colorable contracts, in turn, must be adjudicated under a “colorable” jurisdiction (system of justice – our courts). So when the colorable currency called Federal Reserve Notes was created, the government had to create a jurisdiction (court system) to cover colorable contracts. The incorporated governments called this new form of jurisdiction Statutory Law because though it was based on the Uniform Commercial Code which is based on Admiralty Law, “Statutory” is neither. Thus, Statutory Jurisdiction is colorable.

It sounds complicated, but if you think about it for a few minutes, it is really quite simple. Public Law was used in Common Law courts; Public Policy is used in Statutory courts… and that’s what gave bureaucrats control of our courtrooms. That’s what gave them the ability to prosecute members of the public because a regulation passed by a government agency rather than a law passed by Congress or your State Legislature, was violated.

So our courts have changed… how many times in the past years have you heard the term “The Petitioner does not have Standing to file this case… dismissed!” We have been unable to file cases against our government even when clear abuses of power exist. How many juries have been given rules they are told they must follow in determining a verdict, leaving them no choice other than “guilty” or “not guilty” regardless of what the evidence indicates? How many judges have withheld evidence from a jury? It has brought topics like “Nullification” to the forefront of the politically active. Nullification deals with a jury’s right to dismiss from its decision of guilt or innocence the judge’s directions as to what the jury may or may not consider in reaching its decision. Juries are empowered to nullify the judge’s directions if they feel it is justified.

All of this and more has been caused by the change from Common to a colorable form of Maritime Law called Statutory Law… a form of law required when our various governments incorporated — which, in turn, was required when the Federal Reserve System presented us with a “colorable currency.”

What have we Americans been taught by our government-subsidized education about the cause of our Revolutionary War? Mostly we were told about the Boston Tea Party, the Midnight Ride of Paul Revere, and other nice stories.

Many people say the Revolution began because of the Crown’s Declaratory Act which taxed tea, taxed stamps, forced colonists to quarter in their homes members of the English military, etc. No. It began because of the Rothschilds and their central bank system which, in today’s world, has driven us to the brink of another world war.

It’s true that all those things were great irritants, but the real core problem involved central banking – the Bank of England. The colonists were forced by England’s King to use a paper currency issued by the Bank of England which demanded we use it – and we were to cede our colonial banking and monetary systems and pay interest to the Bank of England for using their paper money.

It sounds eerily like the way the Federal Reserve System in America works today, doesn’t it? It is, in fact, quite similar. So we must start with the assumption that what made our ancestors go to war in the 1700s is quite acceptable to Americans today because we have embraced what they were willing to die to prevent: Central banks and a fiat currency.

The Rothschilds were around when America was a colony of Great Britain and the fact that we were founded on the basis of Common Law troubled them. Why? Common Law is based on substance and rejects “colorable money” and “colorable courts.” Article 1 Section 8 of our Constitution describes for you what “substance” relative to Common Law means: “Gold and silver,” not a meaningless fiat currency that has nothing backing it. That is a currency with no substance and violates Common Law.

Prior to the forming of the Federal Reserve System, America’s Constitutional Republic required the nation to pay its debts in gold or silver and Rothschild banks did not loan gold or silver. Thus they did not like our newly-formed government which rejected a fiat currency with nothing backing it (what we have today). As described above, the Rothschilds allowed the King of England to borrow paper money from them and got repaid in gold and silver.

Our Constitution declared gold and silver as the official currency of the United States of America and that’s why the Rothschilds financed the War of 1812. They wanted America as part of the United Kingdom so they could expand into the New World their Bank of England scam. They of course lost the War of 1812 and began seeking other ways to further their “we’ll loan you paper and you pay us back in gold and silver” scheme and began working on what we now have as a central banking system, the Federal Reserve, founded on December 23, 1913, 100 years after the War of 1812. And how legitimate is the Federal Reserve Act of 1913? Not very. Read the history.

Our ancestors in North America began to revolt against the Brits but we had Common Law in the Colonies at the time. When the King’s tax collectors made their rounds, however, they imposed Admiralty Law on the people. It enabled them to arrest and quickly try people, denying to what were mostly Englishmen and women the common rights due them as citizens of the Crown. That is what caused the Revolutionary War.

Perhaps the most interesting part of our history is that almost exactly the same thing has happened to us once again. What’s the old saying about what happens if we don’t learn from history? By incorporating federal, state, and county governments (because of the Federal Reserve’s colorable currency), the U.S. Government made it possible to remove the Common Law supported by our U.S. Constitution and implement a prostituted form of Maritime (or Admiralty) Law called Statutory Law. Our ancestors refused to tolerate it and it will be interesting to see if today’s society which seems more motivated by security and comfort than by right and wrong and liberty will accept the Law of the Seas.

To make sure we’re all on the same page, let’s start with some definitions and let them guide you to an understanding of how we got in our current mess. Only if we understand the history behind these massive problems will we be able to solve them.

To explain how the loss of Common Law robbed us of our independence and our Republic and how incorporating federal, state, and county governments made it possible, we need some definitions. You’re about to get a graduate school crash course in business and finance (and a little law):

JURISDICTION:

1. The right of a court to hear a particular case, based on the scope of its authority over the type of case and the parties to the case. 2. Authority or control. 3. The extent of authority or control. 4. The territorial range of authority or control.

While researching the jurisdiction of our courts, I came upon an article that was so well done, so easy for a non-lawyer to understand, I decided to reprint portions of it here. One of the difficult things about writing both Parts I and II of this article is stating things in a way that can be understood by non-bankers and non-lawyers. Since I’m not a lawyer, I particularly appreciated this article and recommend that you read it in its entirety HERE. I am not publishing the entire article below, just those parts that apply to this topic.

The article is a condensed story about a man named Howard Freeman and is based on a seminar Freeman gave in 1990. The article is written in ham and eggs English and is not filled with legal terminology that forces you to look every-other-word up in a legal dictionary. The following definition about Common Law, Equity Law, Admiralty/Maritime Law, Courts of Contract, Colorable Money and Colorable Courts, and the Uniform Commercial Code is taken from that seminar and the article written about it.

The Constitution of the United States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may operate:

COMMON LAW

Common Law is based on God’s law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself. For instance, when you cross over the state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, ” BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS – IT’S THE LAW. ” This cannot be Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But Common Law cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT, and is punishable.

EQUITY LAW

Equity Law is law which compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. So, if you have compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation of the contract. Now this can only be a civil action – not criminal. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried criminally, but you can be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If you then refuse to perform as directed by the court, you can be charged with contempt of court, which is a criminal action. Are our seatbelt laws Equity Laws? No, they are not, because you cannot be penalized or punished for not keeping to the letter of a contract. (BARNEWALL NOTE: You may have signed an insurance contract agreeing to always wear your seat belts or otherwise obey all traffic laws and, of course, your state requires automobile insurance coverage.)

ADMIRALTY/MARITIME LAW

This is civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adhering to the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see what jurisdiction the seatbelt laws (all traffic codes, etc) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/Maritime Law and there must be a valid international contract in force.

However, the courts don’t want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdictions, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That is what the Supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case (Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, Supreme Court, 1938) – that the decisions will be based on commercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since they were instructed not to call it Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.

COURTS OF CONTRACT

You must ask how we got into this situation where we can be charged with failure to wear seatbelts and be fined for it. Isn’t the judge sworn to up hold the Constitution? Yes, he is. But you must understand the Constitution, in Article I, § 10, gives us the unlimited right to contract, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty or property of someone else. Contracts are enforceable, and the Constitution gives two jurisdictions where contracts can be enforced – Equity or Admiralty. But we find them being in Statutory Jurisdiction. This is the embarrassing part for the courts, but we can use this to box the judges into a corner in their own courts.

CONTRACTS MUST BE VOLUNTARY

Under the Common Law, every contract must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally by both parties or it is void and unenforceable. This is characteristic: It must be based on substance. For example, contracts used to read, “For one dollar and other valuable considerations, I will paint your house,” etc. That was a valid contract – the dollar was a genuine, silver dollar. Now, suppose you wrote a contract that said, “For one Federal Reserve Note and other considerations, I will paint your house….” And suppose, for example, I painted your house the wrong color. Could you go into a Common Law court and get justice? No, you could not. You see, a Federal Reserve Note is a “colorable” dollar, as it has no substance, and in a Common Law Jurisdiction, that contract would be unenforceable.

COLORABLE MONEY – COLORABLE COURTS

Colorable: That which exists in appearance only, and not in reality; not what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned have the appearance of truth. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.

It is “colorable” Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing because we are using “colorable money.” Colorable Admiralty is now known as Statutory Jurisdiction. Let’s see how we got under this Statutory Jurisdiction.

UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE

The government set up a “colorable” law system to fit the “colorable” currency. It used to be called the Law Merchant or the Law of Redeemable Instruments, because it dealt with paper which was redeemable in something of substance. But, once Federal Reserve Notes had become unredeemable, there had to be a system of law which was completely “colorable” from start to finish. This system of law was codified as the Uniform Commercial Code, and has been adopted in every state. This is “colorable” law, and it is used in all the courts.

(End of text from Howard Freeman’s seminar.)

Do you see how the Federal Reserve Notes were the basic cause of the problems we now see in our courts, our financial system, our Republic, our Independence as a people? They created a fiat currency backed by nothing. Keep in mind, the word “Note” means “Loan.” It is “colorable currency.”

The Common Law, as embodied in the US Constitution, for the protection and security of persons and property, is Substantive Common Law – [substantive right: a right {as of life, liberty, property, or reputation} held to exist for its own sake and to constitute part of the normal legal order of society] – the intention of the Founding Fathers being the assurance of access to this law by the people.

The most important thing we the people can work to achieve is Constitutional Counties. This system was imposed on us from the top down and must be unwound from the bottom up.

As I said in Part I of this article, corporations can be dissolved – and we need to do that. It’s not difficult to achieve… get enough signatures on a petition to get the initiative on your county ballot and vote the corporations out of existence.

It is, however, more difficult than it sounds. It requires extensive planning because you must remember how we got from a Constitutional Republic to Crony Capitalism. Here’s what I think happened.

The Federal Reserve came into being in 1913. Our money was turned into a fiat currency when President Nixon took us off of the gold standard. The U.S. Government was based on Common Law which made colorable money (money lacking substance – Common Law is based on substance) and that made it impossible for it to continue issuing Federal Reserve Notes. So the federal government incorporated itself which made it possible for them to continue with the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes. It became clear that the states could not accept colorable money from an incorporated federal government unless they, too, were incorporated – and the same thing happened to our counties. To gain access to a colorable currency, an entire system had to be created. How much simpler our lives would be if the Treasury Department had taken over America’s monetary system rather than build this octopus so the Federal Reserve System could be maintained! This attests to the power of the Rothschild central banking system. We might want to keep in mind that one of the primary problems in the Middle East is that Islam does not allow loan usury (interest) and not all of the nations in the Middle East have central banks. Libya didn’t have one – until Muammar Gaddafi was removed from office and killed. Libya now has a central bank. (The Stylebook at the Washington Post spells it “Gaddafi.” The Stylebook at the Associated Press spells it “Gadhafi.”)

Though it is not difficult to dissolve the corporations if it is the will of the people to regain their constitutional rights, a great deal of thought must go into how a county that dissolves its corporations will survive without federal and state dollars. Some of the questions that arise are:

  1. If Common Law is returned to our court system and our governing bodies, it requires a currency that has substance and contracts based on that substance. Fiat currency – Federal Reserve Notes – has no substance. How can those people being paid by the federal, state, or county governments get paid in a currency of substance? How about people receiving Social Security and Medicare benefits? How about veterans receiving retirement and VA benefits? They are being paid in Federal Reserve Notes (as we all are) which, since they are not redeemable in gold or silver, are deemed as having no substance and contracts with no substance are rejected by Common Law. This part of problem resolution is complex – but with good planning it can be done.
  2. Can fiat currency be used at all in a Constitutional County?
  3. Is there a way to reject the colorable Statutory Laws created by federal and state governments and build a bridge between Common Law and the Uniform Commercial Code, Admiralty/Maritime Law, Equity Law, etc.?

There are many other questions, but to ask and answer them requires a book, not an article. The purpose of this two-part article has been to explain to you what I believe happened and what I believe the solution to be. It will not be easy. Nor will it be free.

Liberty is never free. How much you value it will determine the price you are willing to pay to regain it.

[The book: The Coming Battle, published in 1899, documents how the politicians of that period didn’t want the debt to be paid off. They wanted the debt to be rolled over from generation to generation. It continues to this day. It’s a must read.]

Click here for part —–> 1,

© 2015 Marilyn M. Barnewall – All Rights Reserved

Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall began her career in 1956 as a journalist with the Wyoming Eagle in Cheyenne. During her 20 years (plus) as a banker and bank consultant, she wrote extensively for The American Banker, Bank Marketing Magazine, Trust Marketing Magazine, was U.S. Consulting Editor for Private Banker International (London/Dublin), and other major banking industry publications. She has written seven non-fiction books about banking and taught private banking at Colorado University for the American Bankers Association. She has authored seven banking books, one dog book, and two works of fiction (about banking, of course). She has served on numerous Boards in her community.

Barnewall is the former editor of The National Peace Officer Magazine and as a journalist has written guest editorials for the Denver Post, Rocky Mountain News and Newsweek, among others. On the Internet, she has written for News With Views, World Net Daily, Canada Free Press, Christian Business Daily, Business Reform, and others. She has been quoted in Time, Forbes, Wall Street Journal and other national and international publications. She can be found in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who of American Women, Who’s Who in Finance and Business, and Who’s Who in the World.

Web site: http://marilynwrites.blogspot.com

E-Mail: marilynmacg@juno.com

Marilyn’s Archives  http://www.newswithviews.com/Barnewall/marilynA.htm

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM

Strong Cities Network Plan for Globally Controlled Police

March 26th, 2016 by

http://www.jbs.org/mobile/jbs-news/featured-news/item/18217-stop-the-

strong-cities-network-plan-for-globally-controlled-police

3-26-2016 9-21-38 AM

By John F. McManus

Because the enemies of freedom never sleep, the guardians of liberty must remain ever vigilant, and ever ready to combat treachery.

Several decades ago, federal planners sought to assign a new status for each of our nation’s states. No longer would there be 50 individual states with their own constitutions, traditions, and borders. Instead, there would be 10 federal districts, each governed from a centrally located office chock full of eager bureaucrats. Gone would be the built-in competition among the states to be the best state, the one with the least taxation and controls, the great inhibitors of growth and productivity.

That planned alteration of state governments did get started and federal offices were indeed established. If you lived in Pennsylvania, you and the people in surrounding states would now be in federal district 2. Californians and their neighbors would be in district 10, and so on. Because sufficient resistance to this revolutionary monstrosity arose, it never got very far and ended up in a memory hole. But those who want a different kind of government here in America, even a super or world government for all of mankind, never stop figuring out new ways to establish their rule. Their latest venture carries the label Strong Cities Network (SCN).

Leading the charge for this new venture is one of President Obama’s newest Cabinet officials, Attorney General Loretta Lynch. It’s hardly a surprise to know that she spelled out the new plan in a September 29, 2015 speech at United Nations headquarters in New York City. Nor is it surprising that New York City’s mayor, the ultra liberal Bill de Blasio, introduced her for that speech.

A Harvard University graduate — both undergraduate and law school — Lynch served as a Federal Reserve official from 2003 to 2005. Appointed U.S. attorney for the eastern district of New York by President Obama, she held that post until she garnered Senate approval to become our nation’s attorney general. She assumed that exalted post on April 27, 2015. At the UN a mere five months later, she revealed that her goal included having the SCN become“an alliance of nations” and a step toward building “a global community.”

Promoters of the SCN scheme insist that it isn’t a government body; it’s merely a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO), the designation awarded to many organizations by the UN. SCN’s initial step consists of linking city governments to the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), which will exert control over a city’s law-enforcement policy. Setting guidelines for police and working toward disarming civilians are its two main goals. This foreign-based group doesn’t hide its determination to grab the weapons of those who are classified Right-leaning.

Four American cities have already affiliated with SCN’s Institute for Strategic Dialogue. They are New York, Denver, Atlanta, and Minneapolis. Canada’s Montreal quickly followed them. These cities are now linked with European cities, where citizens labeled as members of the Right have already experienced the grab for personally owned weapons.

Board members of the ISD include England’s Baron Charles Guthrie, who is a Rothschild banker, a Trilateral Commission member, and a Bilderberg veteran. Another board member is American Dr. Gary Samore, a recent vice president of studies at the Council on Foreign Relations and a member of the world government-promoting seat of the establishment since 1998. Clearly, national sovereignty is the ISD’s ultimate target.

The four U.S. cities already ensnared by the SCN risk not only having their law-enforcement policies determined by the ISD, they also face the possibility of having foreign police in their cities, possibly even blue-helmeted enforcers from the United Nations. Creation of a global police force seems to be looming on the horizon.

One of the excuses for creation of the SCN is a need to aid local police forces to combat Islamic extremists. But the promoters of this dangerous scheme also claim that existing police work has to be performed without any targeting of the rights of Muslims. The Islamic terrorism already carried out is obviously a “crisis” that won’t be wasted.

This new venture by the world planners presents two threats. One is a backdoor plan to wrest control away from local police, and the other a new step in the direction of world government under the United Nations. Our “Support Your Local Police — And Keep Them Independent!” effort must continue to grow. And this SCN scheme constitutes one more reason why there is a need to Get US Out! of the United Nations.

So what to do about this latest threat to sovereignty? We urge that all who read this article contact your representative (202-225-3121) and senators (202-224-3121) by telephone. Politely ask that no federal funding be allowed for the Strong Cities Network. And point out that this newly created scheme will place the police forces of participating American cities under the control of an international organization.

Please also email your representative and senators with the same message.

Where appropriate, contact the officials of the four cities already involved in SCN. And certainly, if you learn of any plans to add more cities to the SCN, contact that city’s officials and urge them to avoid involvement in this new international program designed to destroy local control of police and grant additional power to the UN.

(This article was originally published under the title “A New Threat Aimed at Destroying Sovereignty” in the April 2016 JBS Bulletin.)

10 13 11 flagbar

SURVEY: NO GOD, NO PRAYER, NO CHURCH, BUT HEAVEN IS REAL

March 25th, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin901.htm

1-22-2016 11-11-21 AM

By Chuck Baldwin
NewsWithViews.com

America’s entitlement society has now reached its zenith. For over a half-century, the United States government and its 501c3 corporate churches have indoctrinated several generations of Americans in welfarism–or more commonly known as socialism. When I was a boy growing up, my dad had another name for it: something-for-nothing. And in his lexicon, that term was more than an oxymoron: it represented something that didn’t even exist. To him, there was no such thing as something-for-nothing, even if people acted as if there were–and to desire such a thing was the height of dishonesty and villainy. Oh, and Dad was a Democrat. But hardly anyone today (Democrat or Republican) ISN’T sucking on the government teat, including churches and a sizeable percentage of the “worshippers” inside them.

In fact, the something-for-nothing crowd now dominates modern politics, education, religion, economics, and the media. Parents, pastors, and politicians alike constantly cater to the something-for-nothing mindset. The average American (including the average Christian) seems to have the attitude that they are “owed.” And if they don’t get what they want, boy can they pitch a royal temper tantrum.

Well, as I said, America’s entitlement society has now reached its zenith.

A new survey reveals that more Americans than ever do not believe in God, do not pray, and do not engage in any form of worship. The survey indicates that this is the least spiritual generation of Americans in U.S. history. At the same time, however, the survey says that MORE Americans believe in Heaven.

How can people deny the existence of God and yet believe in Heaven, you ask? Think about it. It’s the ultimate entitlement attitude: even without God I am entitled to enjoy everlasting happiness. No conditions; no requirements; no faith; no repentance; no salvation: I am entitled. I say, again: America’s entitlement society has now reached its zenith.

See the survey report here.

Actually, the results of this survey should not come as a shock. As I said, politically-correct society has been catering to the something-for-nothing crowd for decades, as has the dominant political and media establishments–along with most churches. Politicians promise people that they will be given government goodies, while pastors promise people that they will be given heavenly goodies. No strings attached. It’s all about them and their entitlements.

The vast majority of sermons delivered every Sunday morning around this country are little more than 30-minute pep talks telling everyone how wonderful they are and all the things they deserve. They deserve to be happy. They deserve to be healthy. They deserve to be wealthy. They deserve to get what they want. They deserve that God should cater to their desires. Some of these heretics even teach that they can COMMAND God to give them what they want. What is missing from these weekly sermonettes, of course, is such things as duty, responsibility, work, thrift, sacrifice, humility, dedication, commitment, honor, truthfulness, trustworthiness, loyalty, respect, etc.

Add to the mushy, sloppy, touchy-feely, lovey-dovey, don’t-offend-me kind of churchianity a rabid make-the-Arab-sand-glow warfarism so typical in the average evangelical church–along with a church house filled with gossiping, backbiting busybodies–and it is little wonder that more and more unbelievers prefer to stay that way.

Believe me, if my faith was based on the way so-called Christians have betrayed me, knifed me in the back, lied about me, gossiped about me, slandered me, tried to ruin me, tried to bankrupt me, ad infinitum, I would have no faith either. Thankfully, my faith doesn’t depend on THEM.

I realize that other people cannot personalize what is purely another man’s experience, but all I can tell my unbelieving readers is that I met (in my soul and spirit, of course) a crucified, risen Savior, and He changed my life. He has been my best Friend since the day I first met Him. He has never failed me. He has never forsaken me. He has walked with me through every storm and tempest. And my faith is in HIM.

So, on this Resurrection Sunday, I will stand in my pulpit and tell the wonderful story of how my Friend was crucified for my sins and rose from the dead to save me. If anyone wants to watch my message live this Sunday afternoon at approximately 2:30pm (Mountain Time), here is the link.

And for those who won’t watch the video message, I will simply share my Friend’s story as told by Saint Matthew:

 

“In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. His countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow: And for fear of him the keepers did shake, and became as dead men. And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified. He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay. And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead.” (Matthew 28:1-7a KJV)

The survey mentioned near the beginning of this column is probably a true reflection of how milquetoast preachers and pandering politicians have created America’s ultimate entitlement society. That’s a shame, because if people knew my Friend the way I know Him, they could never let phony Christians and warmongering preachers keep them from loving and trusting Him either.

HAPPY RESURRECTION SUNDAY!

Please order my message, “The Right Of Revolution As Justified In Natural And Revealed Law” here.

© 2016 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved

Chuck Baldwin is a syndicated columnist, radio broadcaster, author, and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded. He was the 2008 Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. He and his wife, Connie, have 3 children and 9 grandchildren. Chuck and his family reside in the Flathead Valley of Montana.

See Chuck’s complete bio here. E-mail: chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com  Website: ChuckBaldwinLive.com

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 

UN Troops to Kill Americans Who Wont Give Up Their Guns

March 24th, 2016 by

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com

 

UN TROOPS TO KILL AMERICANS WHO WON’T GIVE UP THEIR GUNS 

By Dave Hodges

There is a crisis coming. A false flag of epic proportions. Trump will provide the background and the pretext. Gun confiscation, by the UN, will be taking place on US soil. It was practiced in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. They will show up at 3AM, kick in your door, seize your gun and kill you if you offer any kind of resistance. Follow the progression.

3-24-2016 11-52-53 AM

The UN will be the enforcement agency. Why do you think that Quayle, Hagmann and Hodges have talking to you about foreign troops training on our soil?

3-24-2016 11-54-30 AM

Don’t let this man take your gun.

He wants a third term.

 

We have been down this road before.

3-24-2016 11-55-47 AM

TROOPS ORDERED TO KILL ALL AMERICANS

WHO DO NOT TURN IN THEIR GUNS

Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyfkQkchlu4

Published on Jul 16, 2012

http://www.infowars.com/un-gun-grab-f
http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/fr
http://www.infowars.com/army-manual-o
http://www.prisonplanet.com/army-cour...

“Complete disarmament” of the American people
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.comMonday, July 16, 2012

 

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell. Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.” Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a “Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.” Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”  While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the UN “peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.” 

“The  manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document. While the memorandum outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national armies and institute the UN as the planet’s supreme authority with a world army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works for decades.

As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations have tried but failed to accomplish — taking a huge bite out of the second amendment — is by no means far fetched.  After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to the United Nations.

3-24-2016 11-56-52 AM

US State Department Memo validates all claims in this article.

This is where millions of you could spend your last days.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I can just hear the screams of joy coming out of the mouths of many of our dumbed down idiots, educated in our terrorist education system, and still convinced that Uncle Sam is taking care of them.

TOTAL ASSHOLES!

10 13 11 flagbar

 

 

 

 

 

FOR THOSE WHO DOUBT THE UNITED STATES IS INCORPORATED HERE IT IS RIGHT IN ITS OWN LAWS:

March 23rd, 2016 by

By Marilyn Barnewall

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or

(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

HERE’S THE LAW IN QUESTION:

Under title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 subsections 15 and 15(A), “United States” means — (A) a Federal corporation.” It is right in their laws!

HERE’S THE LINK TO TITLE 28 US CODE 3002 (SCROLL DOWN TO#15):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Most of us over the age of 10 remember our car trips cross-country; when you entered a city, it was clearly identified as being Incorporated by a sign at the city limits.  Cities are incorporated, the federal government is incorporated, each State is incorporated, and each County is incorporated, too.  Each Department within cities and counties is also incorporated… your courts, your libraries, your clerk and recorder, parks and recreation – all of them.  If they were not incorporated, it would be impossible for money to be transferred to any of them by the federally-incorporated United States, Inc.  This is not difficult to understand – I realize it is very difficult to believe. 

Anyone who understands Business 101 knows that corporations function from By-Laws, not from a Constitution with a Bill of Rights.  This is why we have unlawful Administrative Courts… Common Law cannot function and has no jurisdiction in the world of corporate law… and corporations are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) which is a reflection of Maritime Law (which is why you see all of the flags in our courtrooms with gold trim on them… the American flag has no gold trim – even Dwight Eisenhower commented on this).

I hope you find this helpful.  MB 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I can forgive anyone for not taking my word on this subject, but you have to be completely brain dead not to take Marilyn’s word for it.

10 13 11 flagbar

STOP THE POLITICAL INDOCTRINATION OF AMERICAS CHILDREN

March 22nd, 2016 by

http://www.newswithviews.com/Swanson/holly101.htm

By Holly Swanson

March 22, 2016

NewsWithViews.com

A subversive political movement has been quietly teaching their beliefs in many of our schools for years.

This movement is now taking steps to expand their reach by establishing a national political indoctrination program to impose their political agenda on students throughout the school system. This indoctrination program would reach children wherever they live and would include charter, private and home school situations.

History reminds us of what can happen when a political movement is allowed to use education as a tool to politically indoctrinate (brainwash) innocent children. Hindsight is 20/20. We have the choice, the power and the opportunity to learn, to take action and to stop the political indoctrination of our children.

The idea of No Child Left Inside is one of the main tools this movement is using to slip their agenda into our schools. Current steps and details regarding this agenda and how this movement is advancing their goals begin with the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act is the federal legislation that directs the course of elementary and secondary education in America. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act was recently reauthorized and the new version of this legislation is called the Every Student Succeeds Act (S.1177). The Every Student Succeeds Act was passed by the House on December 2, 2015, passed by the Senate on December 9, 2015 and signed into law by President Obama on December 10, 2015.

During the reauthorization process, key goals from another piece of legislation, the proposed No Child Left Inside Act of 2015, were inserted into the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) due to the efforts and influence of this political movement.

Congressman John Sarbanes, author of the No Child Left Inside Act, released a victory statement on December 2, 2015 regarding the passage of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) which included the following:

The environmental education provision contained in ESSA comes from the No Child Left Inside Act (NCLI), a bipartisan bill authored by Congressman Sarbanes that is designed to enhance American students’ environmental literacy.”

No Child Left Inside Act goals for environmental education and environmental literacy have been inserted into this legislation, which enables this movement to create the false impression that 1) they have a federal mandate for states to teach this curriculum and, 2) the curriculum attached to teaching these subjects has been approved by Democrats and Republicans at the federal level. This movement also plans to acquire federal funds to execute their national plan to change our children’s beliefs while they are in school. Nothing is set in stone. Responsible action can be taken to derail this plan.

Curriculum Not Scrutinized:

In the rush to pass the Every Student Succeeds Act, the curriculum attached to teaching the No Child Left Inside goals for environmental education and environmental literacy was not thoroughly scrutinized to ensure the intended outcomes were understood and the content would not unfairly influence the education of America’s children.

No Child Left Inside Act: Imposing the Goals of a Political Movement

Congressman John Sarbanes has stated the No Child Left Inside Act “is the arm of an advocacy movement”. In other words, the No Child Left Inside Act is the arm of a political movement. This statement by Sarbanes confirms the purpose of this legislation and this curriculum is to impose the agenda of that movement in our schools and on our children. The following statement from the No Child Left Inside Act reveals how this movement is infusing their agenda into our schools:

Forty-eight States have developed, or are in the process of developing, environmental literacy plans to effectively integrate environmental education into the prekindergarten through grade 12 curriculum and ensure that students graduate from high school environmentally literate.”

How many people in those 48 states realize No Child Left Inside is “the arm” of a political movement and environmental literacy plans are being used to integrate the goals of that movement into our schools? Take away the environmental language and the political goals of this movement come to light:

1) target children in prekindergarten. Start molding the behavior of children attending preschool by using simple messages that align their little hearts and minds with this movement’s beliefs.

2) integrate the political goals of this movement into the curriculum as the way to a) teach the political beliefs of this movement as part of factual learning in multiple subject areas, b) require students to study those political beliefs from prekindergarten all the way through the 12th grade, c) pressure students to apply those political beliefs in school and in their personal lives, d) change the purpose of education and brainwash students to adopt those political beliefs and one political mindset.

3) ensure students graduate with this movement’s mindset by a) passing laws that force schools to teach this movement’s mindset as part of the curriculum and, b) creating a new subject area and a new graduation requirement based on this movement’s mindset. This plan would force students to learn this movement’s beliefs and demonstrate proficiency in this mindset in order to graduate. This also camouflages steps to politically indoctrinate our children, America’s future voters, to support the revolutionary goals of this movement.

This plan to target children, politicize the curriculum and brainwash students to adopt one political mindset, is how communist countries impose their political agenda and train students to submit to their one-way of thinking.

Many Americans, including supporters of environmental education, do not realize that this political movement has changed the meaning and the purpose of environmental education to advance a political agenda.

What is the End Game?

Congressman Sarbanes, author of the No Child Left Inside Act, is also a well known leader in the Education for Sustainability movement. Extensive documentation in the book Training for Treason confirms the beliefs and goals attached to environmental education and environmental literacy are directly aligned with the political agenda of the Education for Sustainability movement and that agenda mirrors Green Party goals and communism.

This is the political agenda of the movement behind environmental education. This movement is on a fast track to slip their communist model of education into place by making their political agenda, their definition of environmental literacy and environmental education, the new foundation of all learning and practice in America’s schools. Is this the purpose of American education?

We Have a Choice:

Environmental literacy plans (developed or being developed in 48 states) are a key part of this movement’s strategy. The purpose of convincing every state to adopt an environmental literacy plan is to 1) make this movement’s definition of environmental literacy the focus of education in every state, 2) use this movement’s definition of environmental literacy to establish graduation requirements, 3) use the school system in every state to establish a national political indoctrination program in short order.

The purpose of convincing each state to make environmental literacy a graduation requirement is to ensure no child in that state can graduate without learning this curriculum; including charter, private and home school students. The Oregon Environmental Literacy Plan is a good example of how the political beliefs of this movement are presented.

It is vitally important to understand, as Congressman Greg Walden points out in the following statement, we have a choice:

“Oregon’s classrooms are no place for politicized instruction of our children mandated by the federal government. Congress recently passed a new law, the Every Student Succeeds Act, to explicitly prevent the federal government from mandating or coercing states into adopting any standards or curriculum, including ‘environmental literacy.’ I will continue working to reduce the federal footprint in our schools and keep politically motivated teaching out of the classroom.” —Congressman Greg Walden (R-OR)

“Politicized instruction” and “politically motivated teaching” do not belong in our schools. We have the choice, the power and the opportunity to stop the political indoctrination of our children and return our schools to safe havens of learning.

The American standard of a politically neutral (party neutral) public education is an essential safeguard to free thought, individual freedom and the democratic process, and we must ensure that the education of America’s youth is not compromised to impose the agenda of any one party or movement.

A Presidential Issue:

Addressing the issue of political indoctrination in America’s schools ought to be one of the top issues in the Presidential race based on the revolutionary agenda of this political movement and, because the current administration and the US Department of Education are promoting ideas and curriculum that align with the agenda of this political movement. We need to know where the candidates running for national, state and local office stand on this issue.

Preserving free thought, individual freedom and the democratic process requires immediate and responsible steps to suspend, scrutinize and remove this movement’s politicized curriculum from our classrooms and from our schools. If we are not FOR political indoctrination then we need to work together and stop political indoctrination. This is a call to action.

To learn more about this issue get a copy of the book Training for Treason which contains extensive documentation regarding the political agenda of this movement. Click here to order.

© 2016 Holly Swanson – All Rights Reserved

To find out what you can do to help stop the indoctrination of America’s children contact We Choose Freedom at: wechoosefreedom@earthlink.net

Holly Swanson is a leading authority on the harmful political agenda of the Education for Sustainability movement. She is a national speaker; a frequent guest on regional and national talk radio and the author of the acclaimed books ‘Set Up & Sold Out’ and ‘Training for Treason’. Swanson is the founder and director of We Choose Freedom® and Operation Green Out!®.

E-Mail: wechoosefreedom@earthlink.net

10 13 11 flagbar

 

De Facto versus De Jure more questions for Judge Anna

March 21st, 2016 by

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Kurt-Kallenbach.html

Your not a De Facto Judge, but a De Jure Judge, right? A lot of people have said you are not a real judge, but what they are trying to say is that your not a corporate judge. But why are people saying you are working for the Cartel/Vatican/Banking?

Next, Corporate U.S. and the European powers to be are suppose to hand the baton of power over to the eastern countries, but are not because they are seeking to retain this global power in fraud? But hasn’t the Pope relinquished the assets over through an agreement recently? Isn’t that what his recent visit was for, to enforce accountability?

Finally, can you explain a little more about this smooth transitional currency re-valuation for all countries and the planned systemic economic breakdown of the U.S.?

Judge Anna answers:

People are SO ignorant– it defies imagination….   

When the Colonists came here they set up Common Law Courts and Amendment VII clearly requires American Common Law Courts to decide all matters affecting people and their property…But in 1965 the last counties and states incorporated their operations— and began operating under international law as a result.

All the courts were unlawfully converted to administrative, maritime, and admiralty jurisdiction. All our Public Offices were vacated, too.  Read the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act and International Organizations Immunities Act–!!!!!!!

Believe it or not, that is what happened.

Therefore there are no American Common Law Courts, no access to the guarantees of the actual Constitution, no enforcement of the Public and Organic Law.  Why? Because the people we trusted were lured by “federal revenue sharing”— a cut of the racketeering profits— and fundamentally changed the form of our government by incorporating.

We, the people, are still owed a Republican style of government and control of the land jurisdiction of this country, but all the people we thought we hired to do the work related to this got sidetracked off to serve other masters.

As a result, if we want American Common Law Courts and Sheriffs dedicated to enforcing the Law of the Land we have to provide those courts and perform those duties ourselves. Nobody else can do it for us and nobody on the public payroll is obligated to.  Why?

Repeat after me: all levels of government in this country unlawfully converted themselves to operate as incorporated franchises of federal “parent” corporations.

They did this because they were greedy and paid off with “federal revenue sharing”— basically kickbacks from federal corporation racketeering.

That left us with all our Public Offices vacated.

Including our courts.

The courts have tried to work around the VII Amendment requirements by substituting international martial common law for American Common Law, but that clearly cannot be justified given the time and context in which the Seventh Amendment was written. 

As for the pernicious (and WRONG) rumor that I “work for the Vatican”— I posted an answer—numerous times already. People who are too lazy to read will just have to twist their tails and spread lies.

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com


 

Questions for Judge Anna – Can’t find you on the cabal’s list of Judges?

A lot of people support this…more would. but Anna Bruce Doucette and others refuse to answer basic as to who they are, who they work for and why they are tied to the government.. and has blood ties and titles.. how is it that they just say.. I’m a judge??  These and many other questions need to be answered.  Most of all why there are warnings from other people to stay away from Bruce as he is nothing but trouble….if all is honest there should be no reason, why transparency into who these self proclaimed judges can’t be had and that ALL questions be answered truthfully and completely .

By Judge Anna Von Reitz

We HAVE answered and answered truthfully and completely, but as these comments clearly show other people are not bothering to read those answers clearly stated by us and by Public Law and in Congressional Records. 

Yes, I have a very foreign given name, but no foreign “titles”— the kingdom that issued those titles is long gone. It ceased to exist in 1918— though some Americans obviously haven’t heard about the end of the Civil War much less World War I.

My Mother’s family have been here since the 1840’s, my Father’s Mother’s family, too, and his Father was born in Europe and emigrated prior to World War 1.

So WHAT?  Anyone want to come fight me over being an “American”??? All you Olsons and Johnsons and DeSilvas and Geraghtys and Van Helgens and Smyth-Joneses and Whitsuns and Pulaskis and Ortegas? Are you “questioners” so clueless that you haven’t noticed that everyone in this country including the “Native Americans” originally came from somewhere else??? And so, why the supposed “issue” about my name?

There is no issue. I was born in Wisconsin in 1956, third generation on one side, fourth generation on the other and you and all the others who still haven’t heard The Big News can go to Clark County Wisconsin and stare at the records until you are all blue in the face.  Then, if you have any sense or decency you can be ashamed.

Very ashamed.

Ditto the idiotic rumor that I am an “agent” of the Vatican. Did I EVER say anything to that effect EVER?  The Vatican came into existence in 1929.  How are they involved in something that happened in 1845???

What do the documents I signed actually say?  I acted as private attorney for the Pope to inform his employees that they are doing things all wrong. 

Anyone here disagree with that analysis of how the government corporations are functioning?

I get no paycheck from the Vatican nor from  the Holy See for doing this task.  It was the same task I was pursuing when we went to Rome and it is the same task afterward— with the important difference that the ultimate CEO of all these corporations AGREED with us that his employees are not performing their jobs correctly and need to full stop and reverse their course in order to avoid liquidation of their corporate charters.

There are many ways to correct an organization that is malfunctioning– in this case, the bank-run “governmental services corporations” are preying upon the people they are supposed to serve.

I already wasted years of my life griping to local, state, and federal officials so I took it to their Boss of Bosses.

And he fully agreed with us and has used the power of his office to undertake correction.

End of story. This is not a job. It is a mission: return American assets to the American People, honor the actual Constitution, get these banks and governmental services corpiorations back in line and end the criminal abuses that have been indulged in by the banks and lawyers.

Now, if any one of you want to be harassed and beaten and otherwise abused by armed commercial mercenaries operating under color of law—- just raise your hands.

If any of you want the value of your money and labor devalued to Third World standards— raise your hands.

If any of you want to lose title to your homes, lands, and businesses— raise your hands.

If anyone here wants the British Crown Corporation to own the copyright to your given name— and therefore a claim to “own” you as chattel backing their debts— raise your hands.

If anyone here wants the actual Constitution and its guarantees “vacated” so that it no longer exists except as a historical document—- raise your hands.

If anybody wants to live as a slave subject to the whims of a “Congress” functioning as the Board of Directors of a bankrupt “governmental services corporation”–either the Federal Reserve version doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. or the IMF’s version doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC.—– just let me know.

I will make sure that your body, your labor, your home, land, children, businesses, heirlooms, share of public resources, credit, and everything else that is attached to your given name is either “donated” to these charming gentlemen and their banker masters or claimed by these same international vermin as “abandoned property”.

After all, the actual Constitution hasn’t been vacated thanks to the efforts of me and Bruce Doucette and others— and it guarantees your UNLIMITED right to contract.

All those who want to accuse us of anything can go line up for the cattle cars that FEMA has waiting. You can go to work as commercial mercenaries operating in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act and herd your friends and neighbors into those cattle cars— until it is your turn to go.

You can all go to Hell as far as I am concerned. God gave you free will. I won’t stand in your way. Whatever you choose is good by me.

My only duty as a Christian is stand up and tell you what is going on and do my best to make sure that you HAVE a choice and that you are aware of what your choices are. 

If you don’t want to believe all the Public Records we have presented already to back up what we’ve told you or are just too lazy to do any thinking or observing or research to confirm things for yourselves, that’s okay, too.

I am not here to run your life or seal your fate. I am only here to make sure I can look myself in the eye each morning and to do all that I can to protect my friends, neighbors, and countrymen—

As for being “judges” most of you don’t know what a judge is or how anything related to judicial services are supposed to work. You think that Bruce and I and others have set ourselves up as judges over you, but in fact, we have reclaimed Public Offices that are OWED to you, so that the Public Court System can be resurrected and the American Common Law Courts are functioning again.

Instead of standing around asking accusatory questions of us you ought to be reading everything we have already written and provided to explain this situation and THEN asking whatever questions are left.

My husband and I issued an official signed and witnessed affidavit of probable cause last June and published it on Amazon.com. It is called “You Know Something Is Wrong When….An American Affidavit of Probable Cause”.  It contains all the history, all the references needed. And if that’s not enough there is also Disclosure 101 with eleven typewritten pages of references to public documents you can check out for yourself as “proof” of what I and the others have brought forward.

Now— this is the FINAL time I am answering anything about who I am or what I am doing for anyone. Paul– please put a flag on this post and if you get any more “questions” of this ilk addressed to you say “See post number______”. (Editors note. It will be article # 186 at www.annavonreitz.com)

And as for all the “Questioners” out there, I challenge you to become “Answerers” — either that, or let me know of your desire to donate yourself and all your rights and property interests to one of the bank-run governmental services corporations and I will gladly cross your name off the list of Americans who are asserting their birthright identity and reclaiming their estates and their lawful government on the land.

For all the “Questioners” who want to cast doubt and false accusations on me and Bruce Doucette—- suggest that you all read  “Lifting the Veil” by Timothy Silver (the information quoted below might jar you loose) and watch the documentary “Merchants of Doubt”. 

From “Lifting the Veil” by Timothy Silver:

“On June 6th 2013, it was revealed that Barack Obama oversaw the largest infringement of the Fourth Amendment in the history of the United States with the construction of a veritable surveillance state, capable of tracking the movements and communications of every American citizen. We now know that the NSA and United Kingdom counterpart GHCQ:

Collect the domestic meta-data of both parties in a phone-call.109

Set up fake internet cafes to steal data.110

Have intercepted the phone calls of at least 35 world leaders, including allies such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel.111

Can tap into the underwater fiber-optic cables that carry a majority of the world’s internet traffic.112

Track communications within media institutions such as Al Jazeera.113

Have ‘bugged’ the United Nations headquarters.114

Have set up a financial database to track international banking and credit card transactions.115

Collect and store over 200 million domestic and foreign text messages each day.116

“I, sitting at my desk, could wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge or even the president, if I had a personal email”. – Edward Snowden

Create maps of the social networks of United States citizens.118

Have access to smartphone app data.119

Use spies in embassies to collect data, often by setting up ‘listening stations’ on the roofs of buildings.120

Track reservations at upscale hotels.122

Have intercepted the talking-points of world leaders before meetings with Barack Obama.123

Can crack encryption codes on cellphones.124

Have implanted software on over 100,000 computers worldwide allowing them to hack data without internet connection, using radio waves.125

Have access to computers through fake wireless connections.126

Monitor communications in online games such as World of Warcraft.127

Intercept shipping deliveries and install back-door devices allowing access.128

Have direct access to the data centers of Google, Yahoo and other major companies.129

Covertly and overtly infiltrate United States and foreign IT industries to weaken or gain access to encryption, often by collaborating with software companies and internet service providers themselves. They are also, according to an internal document, “responsible for identifying, recruiting and running covert agents in the global telecommunications industry.”130

Use “honey traps”, luring targets into compromising positions using sex.131

Share raw intelligence data with Israel. Only official U.S. communications are affected, and there are no legal limits on the use of the data from Israel.132

Spy on porn habits of activists to discredit them.133

Possibly the most shocking revelation was made on February 24, 2014. Internal documents show that the NSA is attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with “extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction.”134 The documents revealed a top-secret unit known as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Unit, or JTRIG.

Two of the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in an effort to discredit a target, and to use social sciences such as psychology to manipulate online discourse and activism in order to generate a desirable outcome. The unit posts false information on the internet and falsely attributes it to someone else, pretend to be a ‘victim’ of a target they want to discredit, and posts negative information on various forums. In some instances, to discredit a target, JTRIG sends out ‘false flag’ emails to family and friends.”

—-End quote.

Remember what Will Rodgers said about taking wooden nickels and what your Grandma told you about the difference between s#$t and shinola.  And then ask yourself who benefits? 

How am I and Bruce Doucette benefiting by saving the actual Constitution contract and enforcing it?  — Except in the sense that all Americans benefit?

And how are the “federal corporations” benefiting? — By creating and enforcing false claims against everyone’s labor and property interests and generating trillions of dollars worth of credit for their own use in the process.  By creating and controlling giant trust and pension funds for their own use, which they employ to undermine other corporations and secure controlling ownership interests in the Fortune 500 and virtually everything else, too.

 

Wake up!  Daylight in the swamps!

10 13 11 flagbar

The Genesis of the Fake Corporate “Personas”

March 19th, 2016 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/03/the-genesis-of-fake-corporate-personas.html

12-21-2015 3-19-06 PM

By Anna Von Reitz

One of the concepts that people are having a lot of trouble with is the difference between an unincorporated business and a corporation—- both are “corporate” in the sense of being fictitious, but one is engaged in private trade under full commercial liability and accrues only private property and the other seeks the benefit of limited liability and incurs the obligations to the State and accrues income by definition.

ABC Company does not equal ABC Corporation.

ABC Company is a “corporate entity” and can do business with ABC Corporation without breaking the “in kind” rule of contracts, but a living man named John Raymond Doe acting as a living man cannot. He can only contract with other living men.

This is what necessitated the adoption of “doing business as” names at the beginning of the 20th Century. More and more businesses were operating as corporations and those corporations wanted to be able to deal directly with living customers who were NOT organized as any kind of business entity. Likewise, many living people wanted the goods and services provided by corporations, but did not have a company or company name that would allow them to do business with a corporation.

So the “State of_________” stepped in and began the process of issuing “doing business as” Names conceived as foreign situs trust franchises doing business within the fictitious “State of Ohio” and subject to the statutory laws of the “State of Ohio”.

Foreign situs trusts are named using the same style conventions as those being used by living men at the time, so there was no way to know the difference between “Hans Luke Jorgenson” the man and “Hans Luke Jorgenson” the foreign situs trust. People could do business with other people and with corporations without ever actually realizing that they were “presumed” to be acting in separate capacities.

It never crossed their minds and they were never told that they were acting as corporate “persons” when they walked into a Ma Bell Office and signed a contract to receive telephone service, but for the purposes of that transaction, they were considered by the State and by Ma Bell as acting in a “corporate” capacity. They had to be, otherwise the in-kind provisions would have been violated and it would not have been possible for corporations to sell services to individual people on contract.

Then along came another layer to the puzzle— in addition to American corporations, international corporations began coming on shore and selling goods and services. This opened up another can of worms. Not only did Americans require a “doing business name” to be able to contract with and receive goods and services from American companies and corporations under “State” law, they needed another “doing business name” to be able to do business with international corporations under international law.

So, the Washington DC Municipality began registering Cestui Que Vie trusts under the doing business names of all the American foreign situs trusts and the additional all-capital letters name was born: HANS LUKE JORGENSON could now do business with international corporations and he was “presumed” to be a franchise of the UNITED STATES (Inc.) and obligated to obey federal statutory law and international law generally.

The problem of course is that poor old Hans back on the farm was never told any of this and never educated to be able to responsibly conduct his own business affairs. The “State” and the “federal government” decided to “indemnify” him as a “ward”—in exchange for him granting all control over his name and estate assets to them. And from that, all the abuses have sprung.

Not only was Hans not told about the meaning of names being “presumed” upon him by the self-interested corporations, but he wasn’t informed of their offer to copyright his name, convert the ownership of his estate to their control, and micro-manage his life according to their statutes, executive orders, and corporate policies.

He was never told about their offer of his labor and his private property including his interest in his land and his business enterprises as collateral backing the debts of the “State of_____” and later, the “STATE OF________” corporations, as well as the debts of the United States of America, Inc., and the debts of the UNITED STATES (INC.)……and soon poor old Hans was “presumed” to be bankrupt…..yada, yada, yada.

The corporations are by nature evil, irresponsible, and self-interested entities created for the sole purpose of making profit and avoiding liability. Unlike companies which bear the burden of full commercial liability, the corporations routinely get away with murder and discharge their debts through abuse of bankruptcy protection.

We have looked high and low and can find no justifiable reason for corporations to be provided with protection from liability in exchange for paying off a portion of their profits as “protection money” to yet another corporation in the business of providing governmental services. It has both the plain appearance and affect of racketeering and extortion under armed force—and all under conditions of semantic deceit and constructive fraud, personage, and impersonation of public officials.

All legal presumptions held against individual people obligating them to perform under commercial contracts that are and always manifestly were NOT in-kind and NOT fully disclosed should be dropped immediately and without recourse as unconscionable and the people should not suffer any loss or claim against their labor, their private property, or their public property interests as a result of the constructive fraud being practiced against them by these corporations—-including and especially the governmental services corporations which have passed themselves off as the lawful government owed this nation.
See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

10 13 11 flagbar

Long Form Birth Certificate Question Who are you?

March 18th, 2016 by

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/03/long-form-birth-certificate-question.html

3-18-2016 11-26-40 AM

By Judge Anna Von Reitz

There are two certificates– The Certificate of Live Birth and the Birth Certificate (Short Form) —- BOTH are securities and BOTH are bonds.

The difference is that the Certificate of Live Birth shows your given name in Upper and Lower Case and tells the day you were born and where you were born.

The short form shows a “birth date” and a birth place and everything is in all capital letters.

The Certificate of Live Birth belongs to the State of _________ corporation issuing it as an indemnification receipt— that is, an insurance receipt guaranteeing that you shall come to no harm as a result of their use of your given name to profit themselves.

The Birth Certificate on the other hand is issued by the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE which seizes upon your given name against the interests of the state where you were born and uses your given name to create a PERSON — which is not “born” but is “birthed”—- with the “birth” of this PERSON you, the baby, are declared “civilly dead” and your name and estate are deemed “granted” to the British Crown— the banks and the judiciary as chattel property— the “cargo” of a “vessel” in commerce.

This unholy and clandestine “system” results in your enslavement.

And it goes on worldwide wherever the banks and bar associations are tolerated.

The Certificate of Live Birth is proof that a baby was born and given your name on the land of a state of the Union.

The Birth Certificate is proof that your natural political status was changed without your knowledge or consent and that you and your estate were seized upon by the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation in criminal malfeasance and act of war against an innocent non- combatant “vessel” that is owed protected status.

These vile, despicable claims are against all law of the land and human dignity and against all treaties and international laws including all the United Declarations these scum have signed and hidden behind.

The other thing that people need to to grasp is that they themselves are the only source of this supposed “wealth”—- bonds are debts. They are promises to pay. Your work and your labor and even your body has been pledged by these bastards so that they could borrow virtually unlimited credit “in your name”—- and so they have. Just like any identity thief, they have used your name and borrowed assets from others using you, your labor, and your land, your homes, and your business as collateral.

They have claimed that your Mother gave you up knowingly and voluntarily as a baby and left you a “ward” of the “State”. Later when you came of age you did nothing to free yourself of this despicable presumption because of course you were never told anything about this and neither was your Mother— so the vermin “presumed” again that you were incompetent and should remain a “ward” of the STATE even as an adult because no sane man would tolerate the status of a slave and dependent surviving on whatever crumbs the criminals choose to give him as a “beneficiary” of the “PCT”— the Public Charitable Trust which was set up as welfare relief for indigent Negroes displaced from the plantations after the Civil War.

This is your thanks for fighting for the Union and standing by the British Monarch through Two World Wars.

If you are not angry yet, coldly, bitterly, intractably angry with all of it, and highly motivated to put an end to it— you should be. You should in fact be willing to crush all such “presumption” under your outraged feet and ready to see these “governmental services corporations” put out of business — permanently— and replaced by honest vendors of “public services”.

This requires the liquidation of the World Bank, IBRD, FEDERAL RESERVE, IMF, WELLS FARGO, and numerous other major banks which have operated the “governmental services corporations” as store fronts.

The FEDERAL RESERVE is operating THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC and the French-based IMF is operating the insolvent UNITED STATES, INC.

Both are crime syndicates engaged in armed racketeering, unlawful conversion, inland piracy, identity theft, credit fraud, probate fraud and impersonation of public officials.

These criminals have borrowed vast sums of money against you and your public and private assets, used the borrowed money to benefit themselves and their cronies, pushed the “credits cards” as far as they will go, then bowed out and sought bankruptcy protection for themselves—- while leaving you named as the “secondary” responsible for paying back all that money they borrowed and gave away or squandered or reinvested for their own benefit.

You see, they claimed to “represent” you like any flim-flam man. They offered your “registration” as proof. They claimed to own you and neither you nor anyone else was the wiser until the credit cards were maxed out and the bills came due.

That is what happened last March. The UNITED STATES, INC. run by the IMF didn’t pay even the interest on its debts, couldn’t even qualify to continue reorganization under Chapter 11.

So now they are being liquidated by mostly Swiss, Getman, and Chinese creditors who THINK that they are owed most of the land and mineral wealth of the western United States because these loathsome criminals behind these bank-run governmental services corporations— “pledged” you, your private property, and your public property to pay theirs debts without your knowledge or permission.

People think that these “Birth Certificates” are “worth millions”—– yes, millions of DEBT. Your supposed debt. And the people who owe you all the money and assets they received by pledging your labor and good name and credit? Why, they are either bankrupt, running, or nowhere to be found.

The thieves have in recent days tried to gag their accusers and made plans to murder their creditors so that they won’t have to pay back what they owe and so that they can claim the “leftover property” — everything that belongs to the victims — as “abandoned” property, just as they did to the Jews in Germany.

Time to wake up and put these vermin under the bus. Time to call up the Pope and the Pentagon and Secretary Ban Ki-Moon and Queen Elizabeth and all the others responsible for this circumstance and point out that the “derivative insurance” of the banks amounts to huge life insurance policies on the Americans and all the hapless people on this planet.

It is worse than a BAD Grade B Movie where the straying husband quietly takes out a million dollar life insurance policy on his wife, then kills her so he can run away with his mistress to the South Seas.

This is what these sickos think they can get away with, with nobody noticing— not even the other banks and insurance companies on the hook for this.

Everyone and I DO mean everyone needs to wake up and start bitching to the local politicians and documenting their family records and recording affidavits regarding their identities and natural birthright status and complaining to the Highest Heavens about this outrageous, immoral, criminal fraud scheme which has been played upon the whole world.

These vermin need to be tracked down, hunted as the criminals they are, all their assets seized for malicious tort fraud, identity theft, personage, barattry, probate and securities fraud, inland piracy, unlawful conversion, and FRAUD, FRAUD, FRAUD—which vitiates all claims and all contracts and for which there is no statute of limitations.

As for your “Certificate of Live Birth” get and Authenticated copy — authenticated at both the State Secretary of State and the U.S. Secretary of State. Record with the local land recorder’s office to prove you were born on the land and are a living American, not some “PERSON” and then “Return it for value” to these felons in suits— if you can resist the impulse to wad it up and shove it up their asses.

Buy no stories of free gold or vast riches or something for nothing. Take no wooden nickels. Sign nothing without a reservation of all rights. Study, study, study and realize that this “thing” that appears to be your government is NOT your government. It is a corporation — a “governmental services corporation” run by corrupt banks, having no more granted authority than JC PENNY or SEARS to run your life, extract your labor, make false claims against your property, harass you, indebt you, or make demands upon you based on statutory military common law.

Tell the “Members of Congress” that they don’t represent you and never have; tell them that instead, they are nothing but spokesmen and flunkies for a bank run governmental services corporation that is in commercial and administrative default and which needs to do away with Section 17 of the Trafing With The Enemy Act as amended by the Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933 and stop pretending that we — their employers, benefactors, and priority creditors — are “enemies”— or we really will become enemies and start liquidating “government” corporations and laying off millions of “givernment” employees and liquidating the assets of the banks and the bank owners and operators– tell them that millions of people now know the truth. There is no escaping it now.

So they might as well come clean and do the right thing because everyone is tuned in and watching and we will all know what to think and do if they don’t.

Sorry this became such a long explanation but I have all these people wandering around thinking that they can get rich off their birth certificate when all that certificate has ever done for them is allow thieves to charge against their credit and rack up debt against them.

I hope that this explanation has made the situation clear–

See this article and over 100 others on Anna’s website here:www.annavonreitz.com

10 13 11 flagbar

U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets

March 17th, 2016 by

http://wearechange.org/u-s-supreme-court-says-no-license-necessary-

to-drive-automobile-on-public-highwaysstreets/

3-17-2016 12-15-38 PMTRAITORS!

By Jeffrey Phillips

U.S. SUPREME COURT AND OTHER HIGH COURT CITATIONS PROVING THAT NO LICENSE IS NECESSARY FOR NORMAL USE OF AN AUTOMOBILE ON COMMON WAYS

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”

Thompson v.Smith, 154 SE 579, 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 “The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, is a common right which he has under the right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business.” –
Thompson vs. Smith, supra.; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 “… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right” -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. 562, 566-67 (1979) “citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access.”

Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009 “The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livelihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees. . .”

Berberian v. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872, See also: Schecter v. Killingsworth, 380 P.2d 136, 140; 93 Ariz. 273 (1963). “The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions.”
Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). “A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use.”

Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. 601, 603, 2 Boyce (Del.) 41. “The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle.”
Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 234, 236. “The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971) “The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.”

House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. 3; 134 Iowa 374; Farnsworth v. Tampa Electric Co. 57 So. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. “The automobile may be used with safety to others users of the highway, and in its proper use upon the highways there is an equal right with the users of other vehicles properly upon the highways. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles.
Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. 762, 764, 41 Ind. App. 662, 666. “The law does not denounce motor carriages, as such, on public ways. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. Both have the right to use the easement.”

Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. 465, 468. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 “A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle.” Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159;
Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 “There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts.” Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456 “The word ‘automobile’ connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways.”
-American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: “(6) Motor vehicle. – The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways…” 10) The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit. “A motor vehicle or automobile for hire is a motor vehicle, other than an automobile stage, used for the transportation of persons for which remuneration is received.”

-International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120 The term ‘motor vehicle’ is different and broader than the word ‘automobile.’”
-City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. 232 “Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than according to the means by which they are propelled” – Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20 ”

The Supreme Court, in Arthur v. Morgan, 112 U.S. 495, 5 S.Ct. 241, 28 L.Ed. 825, held that carriages were properly classified as household effects, and we see no reason that automobiles should not be similarly disposed of.”
Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 1907). “…a citizen has the right to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon…” State vs. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; Cummins vs. Homes, 155 P. 171; Packard vs. Banton, 44 S.Ct. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982;

Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 “The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.”
Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163 “the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business… is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all.” –

Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 “Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty.” People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. “No State government entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, nor waterways… transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. Travel is not a privilege requiring licensing, vehicle registration, or forced insurances.”

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 169 N.E. 22. “Traffic infractions are not a crime.” People v. Battle “Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right… may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right.”

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 “The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.”

Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 “Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.” Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 “RIGHT — A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961. “Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.”

City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. “A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639. “The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.”
Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is required of the natural individual traveling for personal business, pleasure and transportation.”

Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 (1972). “If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the assumption that the statute is void.” –

Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). “With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority.” Donnolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co., 184 US 540; Lafarier vs. Grand Trunk R.R. Co., 24 A. 848; O’Neil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. 887. “The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.”

(Paul v. Virginia). “[T]he right to travel freely from State to State … is a right broadly assertable against private interference as well as governmental action. Like the right of association, it is a virtually unconditional personal right, guaranteed by the Constitution to us all.” (U.S. Supreme Court,

Shapiro v. Thompson). EDGERTON, Chief Judge: “Iron curtains have no place in a free world. …’Undoubtedly the right of locomotion, the right to remove from one place to another according to inclination, is an attribute of personal liberty, and the right, ordinarily, of free transit from or through the territory of any State is a right secured by the Constitution.’

Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. 128, 45 L.Ed. 186. “Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases.” Id., at 197.
Kent vs. Dulles see Vestal, Freedom of Movement, 41 Iowa L.Rev. 6, 13—14. “The validity of restrictions on the freedom of movement of particular individuals, both substantively and procedurally, is precisely the sort of matter that is the peculiar domain of the courts.” Comment, 61 Yale L.J. at page 187. “a person detained for an investigatory stop can be questioned but is “not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled, and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest.”Justice White, Hiibel “Automobiles have the right to use the highways of the State on an equal footing with other vehicles.”

Cumberland Telephone. & Telegraph Co. v Yeiser 141 Kentucy 15. “Each citizen has the absolute right to choose for himself the mode of conveyance he desires, whether it be by wagon or carriage, by horse, motor or electric car, or by bicycle, or astride of a horse, subject to the sole condition that he will observe all those requirements that are known as the law of the road.”

Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. The Supreme Court said in U.S. v Mersky (1960) 361 U.S. 431: An administrative regulation, of course, is not a “statute.” A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle.

Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 185. Automotive vehicles are lawful means of conveyance and have equal rights upon the streets with horses and carriages.

Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. 26, 28-29. …automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Daily v. Maxwell, 133 S.W. 351, 354.
Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. 2d 588, 591. A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle, as any other citizen.

Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42. Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E. 677, 197 Mass. 241, 246;
Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St. Louis Ry. Co., 100 N.E. 157, 158. “A soldier’s personal automobile is part of his ‘household goods[.]’

U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex.), 8 F.3d 226, 235” 19A Words and Phrases – Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. “[I]t is a jury question whether … an automobile … is a motor vehicle[.]”
United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. 1983). Other right to use an automobile cases: –
EDWARDS VS. CALIFORNIA, 314 U.S. 160 –

TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78 – WILLIAMS VS. FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 – CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. 35, AT 43-44 – THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492 – U.S. VS. GUEST, 383 U.S. 745, AT 757-758 (1966) –
GRIFFIN VS. BRECKENRIDGE, 403 U.S. 88, AT 105-106 (1971) – CALIFANO VS. TORRES, 435 U.S. 1, AT 4, note 6 –
SHAPIRO VS. THOMPSON, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) – CALIFANO VS. AZNAVORIAN, 439 U.S. 170, AT 176 (1978) Look the above citations up in American Jurisprudence. Some citations may be paraphrased.

 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

 

As history will teach you, there was a time when America had men of honor in control, but the money provided by the banking cartel eventually diluted their influence, and the department of education, or more correctly lack of it, finally won the day and provided a majority who did not know what freedom really was. All it takes to overthrow a nation is an ignorant population, and a few greased politicians. The Bankers have proved beyond doubt that money can control people, governments, commerce, and the churches. We now grovel at the Bankers feet; to continue our miserable lives; all the while praying in Government Controlled Churches for salvation.

2-6-2015 10-13-51 AM

Administration Grants FBI More Raw Access To NSA Data Just As FBI Claims To Be Implementing New Minimization Procedures

March 16th, 2016 by

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160312/07492233880/administration-grants-fbi-more-raw-access-to-nsa-data-just-as-fbi-claims-to-be-implementing-new-minimization-procedures.shtml

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160312/07492233880/administration-grants-fbi-more-raw-access-to-nsa-data-just-as-fbi-claims-to-be-implementing-new-minimization-procedures.shtml

By the offsetting-fouls? dept
— that the FBI’s rules governing its access to data collected by the NSA have changed. To what exactly, no one knows. Neither agency is offering any details.

The classified revisions were accepted by the secret US court that governs surveillance, during its annual recertification of the agencies’ broad surveillance powers. The new rules affect a set of powers colloquially known as Section 702, the portion of the law that authorizes the NSA’s sweeping “Prism” program to collect internet data. Section 702 falls under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa), and is a provision set to expire in 2017.

A government civil liberties watchdog, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Group (PCLOB), alluded to the change in its recent overview of ongoing surveillance practices.
As of 2014, there were few limits to the FBI’s access to NSA data. The PCLOB expressed its concerns at that time. Apparently, things have improved, but no one’s willing to detail the additional restrictions.

We’re just expected to believe they’re in place.

[T]he PCLOB’s new compliance report, released last month, found that the administration has submitted “revised FBI minimization procedures” that address at least some of the group’s concerns about “many” FBI agents who use NSA-gathered data.

“Changes have been implemented based on PCLOB recommendations, but we cannot comment further due to classification,” said Christopher Allen, a spokesman for the FBI.

Other spokespeople had similar nods of “yes, more restrictions” to add and even hinted that these new limits may be made public at some point. Heartening news… perhaps. We don’t know how expansive the data-sharing was prior to the new guidelines and we still don’t know how scaled back it will be post-restrictions.

For that matter, it seems as though the new limits will be largely offset by the administration’s earlier announcement that the FBI would have more access to NSA data.

The Obama administration is on the verge of permitting the National Security Agency to share more of the private communications it intercepts with other American intelligence agencies without first applying any privacy protections to them, according to officials familiar with the deliberations.

The change would relax longstanding restrictions on access to the contents of the phone calls and email the security agency vacuums up around the world, including bulk collection of satellite transmissions, communications between foreigners as they cross network switches in the United States, and messages acquired overseas or provided by allies.

So, on one hand, the FBI is claiming that its backdoor search permissions have been dialed back, but that comes roughly two weeks after the administration announced its plans for expanded data sharing.

What’s being scooped up under national security authority is being used for plain vanilla law enforcement. Not only can the FBI access the NSA’s collections (and it has been… for several years now), but it can pass info it finds down the line to local law enforcement agencies. Any minimization procedures put in place by the FBI at the suggestion of the PCLOB may still be there, but the agency itself will be given unminimized access to NSA data hauls.

What does this rule change mean for you? In short, domestic law enforcement officials now have access to huge troves of American communications, obtained without warrants, that they can use to put people in cages. FBI agents don’t need to have any “national security” related reason to plug your name, email address, phone number, or other “selector” into the NSA’s gargantuan data trove. They can simply poke around in your private information in the course of totally routine investigations. And if they find something that suggests, say, involvement in illegal drug activity, they can send that information to local or state police. That means information the NSA collects for purposes of so-called “national security” will be used by police to lock up ordinary Americans for routine crimes.
And we don’t have to guess who’s going to suffer this unconstitutional indignity the most brutally. It’ll be Black, Brown, poor, immigrant, Muslim, and dissident Americans: the same people who are always targeted by law enforcement for extra “special” attention.

The rule change will basically codify the FBI’s backdoor searches, making it that much tougher to challenge in court. Not only that, but the NSA’s overwatch of the data lends everything collected just enough “national security” interest to make evidence collected unavailable to defendants and will encourage even more parallel construction by law enforcement agencies.

The “incidental” collection of Americans’ communications and data will no longer be just a regrettable part of the “collect it all” approach. It will be a feature, rather than a bug. Local law enforcement agencies can’t do much to pursue overseas suspects but they will be very interested in anything pulled from NSA haystacks that falls into their jurisdictions. If the FBI has actually beefed up its minimization policies — as the Guardian’s article suggests — then it will have nothing to pass along. The agency may actually have more restrictive policies now, but the administration’s proposal would effectively give the FBI a reason to ignore them.

Furthermore, the new expansion of sharing actually does very little to expand domestic law enforcement use of NSA collections. The FBI has been able to do this since 2002, when the FISA Court granted the Bush administration its request for expanded sharing. The Bush team expanded this again in 2008 and the Obama administration has been at work on the logistical framework and codification of ongoing domestic surveillance.

The FBI may have new minimization procedures but they only kick in after it’s already helped itself to the NSA’s raw data. Since it has the permission to pass information along for law enforcement purposes, the only entities that may see only minimized data will be much further down the line.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

It grieves me that there is even one American that is stupid enough to believe we live in a democracy and we are free to vote for our leaders, and our majority votes are how and who gets elected. People. you need to get your head out of your ass and do some research. AMERICA is an oligarchy and we are slaves to their corporate government services agency that we call Congress, President, & Supreme Court. The God Damn Bankers own us!

10 13 11 flagbar

5 Most Powerful Families That Secretly Control The World

March 15th, 2016 by

Recommended by R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./ sciences
Freelance Investigative Science Reporter since 1996
becworks@gmail.com

VIDEO: (5.39 minutes)

REPORTER NOTES: Direct Transcript from the video…must see video for photos

5. ROTHSCHILD

The House of Rothschild is widely considered to be the richest family in the world with estimates of net worth ranging from $500 billion in personal assets to $100 trillion n financial assets.
It has been at the hub of global finance since the 1760s, with Mayer Amschel Rothschild placing his 5 sons in the world’s 5 financial centers.

The family solidified its global reach in the 19 century by funding monarchies, governments, and both sides in the Napleonic wars.

A newspaper at the time described the family as the “brokers and counselors of the Kings of Europe and the republican chiefs for America.”

Today the Rothschild family is said to maintain its control through the US Federal Reserve having deployed its agent, Paul Warburg, to create the powerful quasi-government entity in 1913.

4. ROCKEFELLER

The Rockefeller family empire began in 1870 when John D. Rockefeller founded the Standard Oil Company that would make him the richest single person in history with a net worth of $400 billion.

Recognizing the threat of such wealth, President Theodore Roosevelt warned that Rockefeller interests were creating an invisible government.

The Rockefeller plan has since included funding the United Nations headquarters and founding the Bilderberg conference of the global super elite.

Today the Rockefeller family continues its agenda through controlling interests in Chase Manhattan Bank, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and BP.

3. MORGAN

The House of Morgan ascended when John Pierpont Morgan and the Rothschilds gave the US Treasury 3.5M ounces of gold during the Panic of 1893.

Having control of the U.S. gold supply, Morgan financed the creation of America’s largest corporations including GE, AT&T, and US Steel.

This leverage over the Treasury led to charges that the family forced America into the World War I to protect loans made to Russia and France.

J.P. Morgan Jr. provided a $500M war loan and collected a 1% commission on the supplies his corporations provided.

It is also rumored that the Morgans played a role in encouraging the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor by conspiring to share war profits with the Iwasaki and Dan clans who owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui.

Today the House of Morgan maintains the world’s largest private gold vault – allegedly linked by tunnel to the New York Federal Reserve Bank.

2. DUPONT

Eleuthere Irenee du Pont de Nemours founded the Du Pont family empire in 1802 when he established a gunpowder mill in Delaware.

The Du Pont family rooted itself in US affairs, using back-channel connections with Napoleon to negotiate the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.

By WWI, the Du Pont Company was supplying 40% of the world’s explosives, and by WWII it was producing plutonium for US atomic bombs.
It’s believed that the Du Pont family’s support of US war efforts allowed it to dictate the prohibition of hemp farming and marijuana use in order to protect their nylon manufacturing business.

Today the DuPont corporation is the 2nd largest producer of GMO seeds in the world and it actively funds a “doomsday seed vault” that ensures its product can REPLANT the earth AFTER a global disaster.

1: BUSH
The Bush political dynasty began with Prescott Sheldon Bush, who was born in 1895 and attended Yale University as a member of the Skull and Bones Society.

In 1933, it is rumored that Bush led a failed coup attempt against president FDR (funded by the DuPont’s, Rockefellers, and Morgans).

The “Business Plot” was covered up and Bush rose to be director of Union Banking Corporation when it was suspected of hiding NAZI gold during WWII.

Both Prescott’s son, George HW, and grandson, George W, became President of the United States and both initiated wars with Iraq that profited companies with Bush family ties, such as Halliburton and KBR.

Today the Bushes are considered the most powerful family in US politics, having significant fortunes in banking and oil and having yet another member, Jeb, running to be the next us president.

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

What is not mentioned here is the thousands of super rich that has assisted in building a multimillion man army of politicians and plutocrats all over the world, who are the instigators and managers of the creation of a one world government corporation, which precludes any participation in determining who the leaders are by corporate fiat. All this was made possible by the Bankruptcies of early American government from war depts., resulting in the corporatization of America. The scumbag employees of the Bankers are what we call our Congressmen, Senators, Supreme Court Judges and Presidents. This same method was used to corporatize our State Governments, Counties, and Cities. Among the most successful of their accomplishments was in controlling Education and making intellectual surfs of our most valuable assets; our children who grow up supporting them. Now is the time for all courageous men to come to the aid of our country, shouting “Give us Liberty, or Give us Death”! There is no dishonor in protecting LIBERTY!

10 13 11 flagbar

Media conspire with Soros radical groups to destroy Trump campaign

March 14th, 2016 by

http://talkbackwithchuckwilder.blogspot.com/2016/03/311-steven-camarota-jim-kouri.html

3-13-2016 7-06-45 PM

By Jim-Kouri & Steven Camarota

During a fundraiser in Philadelphia, President Barack Obama said he was going to counter his Republican opponents in the House, the Senate and in the States. “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun. Because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”
People like George Soros know how to plan ahead to manufacture mob violence masquerading as social movements. It worked like a charm in Ferguson, Missouri, and laying the groundwork for energizing the critical black turnout in 2016, courtesy of #BlackLivesMatter and others. #BLM is also serving as a useful vehicle for suppressing the the Donald Trump for President phenomenon.

And guess what group is helping Soros, the Democratic Party and their support groups? “None other than the mainstream news media including Fox News Channel. There’s always a good guy and a bad guy in their simpleton coverage and so the good guys are Black Lives Matter and the bad guys are Trump supporters,” said political strategist Michael Baker.
“While no one died as a result of Trump appearances and speeches, the news media openly launched an attack on him in order to portray him as a “Nazi,” a “fascist,” a “bully” and other pejoratives. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton — who’s being investigated for a number of “actions” she took including abandoning Americans in Libya who ended up dead — is being portrayed as the voice of reason,” Baker also pointed out.

“George Soros’ Moveon.org anarchists, along with Bernie Sanders, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, F**k the Police, and typical Chicago-Style-Democrat-thug politics were responsible for the riot in Chicago where Trump was to speak. Many were carrying Mexican flags and wearing Muslims Hate Trump T-shirts. This is the second stage of planning to derail Trump. Because Trump had to cancel the Chicago speech, these gangsters will try this again and again,” said News with Views columnist Kelleigh Nelson

Recently during an appearance on Univision, the Hispanic television network, presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton said, “I believe there are all kinds of underground movements and efforts in our country that try to use violence or assert beliefs that I find often lead to violence.” Clinton said that before outright accusing some police officers of being terrorists. “I think that when you have police violence that terrorized communities, that doesn’t show the respect that you’re supposed to have from respecting people in your authority, that can feel, also, terrorizing,” she said.

“It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to discover that thugs from Democratic Party-supporting unions, Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, Code Pink and other progressive and socialist organizations have planned to turn public opinion against the GOP’s bad boy of politics, Donald Trump,” said former police detective and military intelligence operative Sid Franes, who is African American. “He may be the Republicans’ bad boy, but at least he’s not the Democrats’ pathological liar or crime lord,” he added.

3-14-2016 12-16-12 PMYou would think Trump allowed Americans to be abandoned in Libya.

While the Black Lives Matter movement (BLM) casts itself as a spontaneous uprising born of inner city frustration, it is just the latest — perhaps more dangerous — well-funded communist/socialist organization to come down the pike. These radical groups have been agitating against America for decades and with few exceptions have been linked to the Democratic Party.

One of these groups’ biggest financiers is none other than multi-billionaire George Soros.
Not long ago, the Occupy Wall Street movement was on the march especially in New York City. Their actions — including violent episodes — weren’t blamed on Trump, but on a terrible economy. However, many of the same people involved then are involved now and their anger and actions are blamed on Donald Trump.

These groups have provoked police killings and other violence, lawlessness and unrest in minority communities throughout the U.S. BLM appears to be exercising considerable leverage over the Democratic Party, in part by pressuring and intimidating Democratic candidates such as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (VT) into embracing their cause.

The movement could also assist President Obama’s exploitation of racial divisions in society beyond his final term in office.
Exploiting blacks to promote Marxist revolution is an old tactic. The late Larry Grathwohl, former FBI informant in the Weather Underground, understood from personal experience how white communists exploited blacks and other minority groups. He said that Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn regarded Barack Obama, whose political career they sponsored, as a tool—a puppet—to use against white America. Obama’s legacy at home will certainly include more racial division.

BLM launched in 2013 with a Twitter hashtag, #BlackLivesMatter, after neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman was acquitted in the Trayvon Martin killing. Radical Left activists Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi claim credit for the slogan and hashtag. Following the Michael Brown shooting in August 2014, Dream Defenders, an organization led by Working Families Party(ACORN) activist and Occupy Wall Street anarchist Nelini Stamp, popularized the phrase “Hands Up–Don’t Shoot!” which has since become BLM’s widely recognized slogan.

Garza, Cullors and Tometi all work for front groups of the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO), one of the four largest radical Left organizations in the country. The others are the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS). Nelini Stamp’s ACORN—now rebranded under a variety of different names—works with all four organizations, and Dream Defenders is backed by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center and others.

One of the few Trump defenders is Fox News Channel’s Judge Jeanine Pirro (see video below) who stated on Saturday night: “Since when if you state an opinion are you responsible for someone’s reaction?” she asked. “Since when do you have the right to interrupt my First Amendment right to listen to a candidate for the highest office in the land?”

“This is America. Not the Soviet Union,” said Judge Jeanine. “Your free speech, if it differs from mine, doesn’t mean that you’re right and I’m wrong, and therefore I must be silenced. But that is exactly what the left tried to do in Chicago last night, and again moments ago in Kansas City to more than 25,000 who came to hear Donald Trump.”
Protesters, of course, have the right to dissent, said Judge Jeanine. “But you cannot defend assault by arguing verbal provocation,” she warned.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYLPnC_-oLI

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

NEVER FORGET THE MEDIA INDUSTRY IS OUR MOST EFFECTIVE ENEMY!

10 13 11 flagbar

ANATOMY OF A MURDER

March 12th, 2016 by

Michael Gaddy is a political activist, writer and teacher who defends and teaches the Constitution as ratified (Originalist), our Bill of Rights and the tenets of our Declaration of Independence. He is constantly trying to understand why the great majority of people in this country are content being slaves to an unconstitutional, criminal government; a government that is systematically destroying the intent of the founders of this country and the culture that brought us Liberty and Individual Freedom. Dependent on readers in continuing this effort, please support his work by mail at: 404 West Main St. PMB 121, Cortez, CO 81321.


“It is forbidden to kill, therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets” ~Voltaire

12-21-2014 7-40-05 AM

On January 26, 2016, Robert LaVoy Finicum was murdered on a lonely stretch of highway in Oregon by as yet unnamed government employees. It was murder in the first degree for it meets all four of the legal tenets for such a crime.

Purposely. Lavoy Finicum, Ammon Bundy, Shawna Cox, Ryan Bundy, Victoria Sharp and others were purposely led into the aforementioned lonely stretch of highway in Oregon specifically to engage them in circumstances which favored the employees of the state while minimizing any form of defense or retaliation. There was obvious prior knowledge by employees of the state as to the direction and route the above parties would be traveling. (obvious plant inside) Thus, the stretch of highway that provided no cell phone service; the obviously pre-planned and set up roadblock; snipers deployed in the surrounding woods and the firing upon the vehicle(s) when no shots had been fired from those vehicles at the government employees. Going 70 mph on a public road to avoid being shot does not necessitate a death penalty. The employees of the state have no valid claims of self-defense.

Knowingly: This point is easily established by the previously mentioned facts in evidence. The employees of the government knowingly led the Bundys, Finicum and others into a pre-planned scenario complete with a roadblock which created the desired “kill zone.”
Recklessly: Government employees recklessly fired deadly weapons into the vehicle(s) containing people who at the time had no wants or warrants outstanding against them, nor were they fleeing the scene of a crime. Therefore, there existed no probable cause for the actions of members of law enforcement be they local, state or federal.

Negligently: there is a multitude of available evidence which indicates the entire operation conducted by law enforcement on that day was negligent in the extreme. Officers could have detained and questioned all involved—if that was their true intent—-which the planned roadblock and weapons fired into occupied vehicles proves otherwise. On numerous occasions, Bundy, Finicum and others were seen in and around town, even traveling to the airport where the FBI command post was located to engage the leadership there in conversation. Ammon even asked if any of the officers were LDS. (Mormons) A peaceful arrest could have occurred there or various other locations with little fanfare or shooting. But, acting out of pure negligence and malice aforethought, members of law enforcement opted instead for what became a deadly shootout with totally unnecessary loss of life and freedom. These acts on the part of these particular government employees were premeditated and designed to produce the desired outcome.

Legal charges which were made against Bundy and others retroactively did not constitute probable cause for the initiation of the stop or deadly force. Probable cause cannot be established ex post facto.
Every single bit of evidence provided by the so-called “authorities” in this crime further indicts their actions. The actions of the government employees are Prima facie evidence the desired end results were achieved as planned.

Someone was going to pay dearly for the egg on the face of the federal sheriffs that occurred in Bunkerville, Nevada in April of 2014. They reestablished their dominion and control over the masses by shooting LaVoy Finicum in the back at least twice, therefore taking his life. Shooting someone in the back is an act of total cowardice. The federal sheriffs have become characters not unlike Robert Ford of Jesse James fame. “It was a dirty little coward who shot Mr. Howard…” Once in America it was seen as dishonorable to shoot anyone in the back, even a wanted criminal.

It appears the state sheriffs in Oregon who shot Lavoy in the back are having problems with some members of the SS death squad of the federal sheriffs (FBI Hostage, Rescue Team HRT) for shooting and missing LaVoy Finicum and then lying about shooting at all. Of course we remember the HRT who were deployed at the Weaver home in 1993, where again, another victim of tyranny was shot in the back (preferred tactic of cowards) this time 14 year-old Samuel Weaver with his mother Vicki shot in the face while holding her infant daughter shortly thereafter. Of course the FBI HRT member, one Lon Horiuchi, who shot the unarmed and infant toting Mrs. Weaver, would later plead the 5th Amendment when questioned about his cowardly act before the US Senate. Ironic is it not these federal sheriff assassins demand their constitutional rights when confronted with denying the right to life, liberty and happiness to others?

At some point in time the federal macho men are going to claim they were acting in accordance with the request of the governor of Oregon. But, again, that damned constitution is going to get in their way—-not really. Was the legislature of the state of Oregon in session when the Oregon governor asked for federal intervention? If not, was it possible to call them into session? Governor Kate Brown said on January 2, 2016:
[Federal officials] “must move quickly to end the occupation and hold all of the wrongdoers accountable.”
“This spectacle of lawlessness must end, and until Harney County is free of it, I will not stop insisting that federal officials enforce the law.”

Liberty, Justice and the American people continue to pay a terrible price for electing people to high office who wouldn’t know the Constitution if they found it floating in their morning coffee. Article IV Section IV of said Constitution specifically states the legislature of a state, not the governor, is responsible for calling in the central government to deal with “domestic violence.” The governor cannot do so if the legislature is in session or can be called into session. Of course, with the collection of constitutionally ignorant air wasters currently serving in most state legislatures, the results probably would not have been much different.

The evidence the ambush of the Bundy/Finicum party was deliberately and precisely planned to end the way it did, with the exception the forces manning that ambush were resolved to take out as many people as they could, is irrefutable. This is corroborated by the number of shots fired at the vehicle after LaVoy Finicum had been shot in the back and lay dying, without help, in the snow.
The 18 year old lady who was in the vehicle at the time was released, without charges, even though her life was in constant jeopardy by government agents shooting indiscriminately into the vehicle where she was a passenger. She has a valid case of attempted murder against all the government agents present at that shooting. Don’t hold your breath.

There is the charge that LaVoy Finicum was reaching for a gun, and a gun conveniently appeared to support the government’s allegation. There is an issue here of course of whether he was reaching for that weapon or whether his was a reaction to having already been shot. A huge issue is that Finicum and the others in his vehicle had been fired on before he exited that vehicle. No one can deny for a moment that he exited his vehicle with his hands up.

LaVoy Finicum was shot in the back at least twice, according to the autopsy, a cowardly act by men in body armor, some cowering in fear behind cover. Economics Professor and columnist Walter E. Williams once asked and then answered his own question. The question was: How can you tell when your government is violating its authority? Professor William’s answer was most relevant to the subject of this Rant. It was: If the government is doing something, that if you did the same thing, you would go to jail, the government is acting outside its authority.

Apply this answer please to the ambush and death of LaVoy Finicum. Switch roles. If the government employees were to have been driving down the road and a group like the Bundys and others attempted to stop them, say for a citizen’s arrest, while standing armed on the side of the road and behind cover, and the government employees attempted to exit the obvious threat and failing to do so one of them exited his vehicle with his hands up and was promptly shot in the back and killed, would those who did so be charged with a crime?

If you believe, even for a nanosecond, that federal, state and local sheriffs have a right and subsequent immunity for doing what they did to LaVoy Finicum and the others sitting in prison, simply because they were acting under the color of authority, your proper place of residence should be in the old Soviet Union, Cambodia under Pol Pot or Nazi Germany. Any freedom and liberty that you experience is wasted on an undeserving dolt. Samuel Adams, a true and faithful Patriot to his death, had some words especially for you: “Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; may your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”

IN RIGHTFUL REBEL LIBERTY

Michael is a political activist, writer and teacher who defends and teaches the Constitution as ratified (Originalist), our Bill of Rights and the tenets of our Declaration of Independence. He is constantly trying to understand why the great majority of people in this country are content being slaves to an unconstitutional, criminal government; a government that is systematically destroying the intent of the founders of this country and the culture that brought us Liberty and Individual Freedom. Dependent on readers in continuing this effort, please support his work by mail at: 404 West Main St. PMB 121, Cortez, CO 81321.

10 13 11 flagbar

Dear Senators:

March 11th, 2016 by

By Bill Schoonover
3096 Angela Lane
Oak Harbor, WA

I have tried to live by the rules my entire life. My father was a Command Sergeant Major, U.S. Army, who died of combat related stresses shortly after his retirement. It was he who instilled in me those virtues he felt
important – honesty, duty, patriotism and obeying the laws of God and of our various governments. I have served my country, paid my taxes, worked hard, volunteered and donated my fair share of money, time and artifacts.

Today, as I approach my 79th birthday, I am heart-broken when I look at my country and my government. I shall only point out a very few things abysmally wrong which you can multiply by a thousand fold. I have calculated that all the money I have paid in income taxes my entire life cannot even keep the Senate barbershop open for one year! Only Heaven and a few tight-lipped actuarial types know what the Senate dining room costs the taxpayers. So please, enjoy your haircuts and meals on us.

Last year, the president spent an estimated $1.4 billion on himself and his family. The vice president spends $ millions on hotels. They have had 8 vacations so far this year! And our House of Representatives and Senate
have become America’s answer to the Saudi royal family. You have become the “perfumed princes and princesses” of our country.

In the middle of the night, you voted in the Affordable Healthcare Act, a.k.a. “Obamacare,” a bill which no more than a handful of senators or representatives read more than several paragraphs, crammed it down our throats,
and then promptly exempted yourselves from it substituting your own taxpayer-subsidized golden health care insurance.

You live exceedingly well, eat and drink as well as the “one percenters,” consistently vote yourselves perks and pay raises while making 3.5 times the average U.S. individual income, and give up nothing while you (as well as the president and veep) ask us to sacrifice due to sequestration (for which, of course, you plan to blame the Republicans, anyway).

You understand very well the only two rules you need to know – (1) How to get elected, and (2) How to get re-elected. And you do this with the aid of an eagerly willing and partisan press, speeches permeated with a certain
economy of truth, and by buying the votes of the greedy, the ill-informed and under-educated citizens (and non-citizens, too, many of whom do vote) who are looking for a handout rather than a job. Your so-called “safety net”
has become a hammock for the lazy. And, what is it now, about 49 or 50 million on food stamps – pretty much all Democrat voters – and the program is absolutely rife with fraud and absolutely no congressional oversight?

I would offer that you are not entirely to blame. What changed you is the seductive environment of power in which you have immersed yourselves. It is the nature of both houses of Congress which requires you to subordinate your virtue in order to get anything done until you have achieved a leadership role. To paraphrase President Reagan, it appears that the second oldest profession (politics), bears a remarkably strong resemblance to the oldest.

As the hirsute first Baron John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton (1834 – 1902), English historian and moralist, so aptly and accurately stated, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” I’m only guessing that this applies to the female sex as well. Tell me, is there a more corrupt entity in this country than Congress?

While we middle class people continue to struggle, our government becomes less and less transparent, more and more bureaucratic, and ever so much more dictatorial, using Czars and Secretaries to tell us (just to mention a
very few) what kind of light bulbs we must purchase, how much soda or hamburgers we can eat, what cars we can drive, gasoline to use, and what health care we must buy. Countless thousands of pages of regulations strangle our businesses costing the consumer more and more every day.

As I face my final year, or so, with cancer, my president and my government tell me “You’ll just have to take a pill,” while you, Senator, your colleagues, the president, and other exalted government officials and their families will get the best possible health care on our tax dollars until you are called home by your Creator while also enjoying a retirement beyond my wildest dreams, which of course, you voted for yourselves and we pay for.

The chances of you reading this letter are practically zero as your staff will not pass it on, but with a little luck, a form letter response might be generated by them with an auto signature applied, hoping we will believe that you, our senator or representative, has heard us and actually cares.
This letter will, however, go on line where many others will have the chance to read one person’s opinion, rightly or wrongly, about this government, its administration and its senators and representatives.

I only hope that occasionally you might quietly thank the taxpayer for all the generous entitlements which you have voted yourselves, for which, by law, we must pay, unless, of course, it just goes on the $19 trillion national debt for which your children and ours, and your grandchildren and ours, ad infinitum, must eventually try to pick up the tab.

My final thoughts are that it must take a person who has either lost his or her soul, or conscience, or both, to seek re-election and continue to destroy the country that I deeply love. You have put it so far in debt that we will never pay it off while your lot improves by the minute, because of your power.

For you, Senator, will never stand up to the rascals in your House who constantly deceive the American people. And that, my dear Senator, is how power has corrupted you and the entire Congress. The only answer to clean
up this cesspool is term limits. This, of course, will kill the goose that lays your golden eggs. And woe be to him (or her) who would dare to bring it up.

Sincerely,

Bill Schoonover

Independent Media Is Fighting Disinformation: Declare Your Independence!

http://www.globalresearch.ca/declare-your-independence/25496

By Global Research
Global Research, March 10, 2016

Declare Your Independence! There can be no denying it: these are exciting and often troubling times, and changes are unfolding at unprecedented rates. Few can claim not to have knowledge of the widespread protests that have been rocking the globe, and indeed the word “revolution” is on many people’s lips. Sadly, the imperial war machine continues to rear its violent head in exponential proportion to worldwide demand for equality, justice and indeed peace itself.
We are witnessing large-scale unrest, entire populations who refuse to continue living in poverty and be exploited at the hands of a small ruling elite, who prosper while their nations flounder.

Does this pattern sound familiar? This, in fact, describes the undercurrents of populations not just in faraway countries; the spirit of resistance is bubbling up in our own backyards and across neighboring borders. In turn, mainstream media is doing its best to quell the revolutionary tide and keep the populations apathetic or else completely misguided.

So where should we be turning our focus? What possibilities do we have to organize, mobilize and inform ourselves?

6 years ago, Kevin Zeese wrote the following in a Global Research article:

“…We need independent media. Web based outlets like this one are a critical ingredient to the success of advocacy efforts. Like so many businesses in the United States, the media is controlled by concentrated group of corporations. A handful of companies own all the hundreds of television stations on your cable TV. The same is true of radio stations. More and more newspapers are part of syndicates. These conglomerates has resulted in homogenized that only reports a concentrated corporate perspective.” (Declare Your Independence! Independent Media, Independent Political Movements, Independent Electoral Activity, Global Research, July 3, 2010)

Here at Global Research, maintaining independence in order to deliver the REAL news is our guiding principle. Our correspondents and volunteers are devoting a great deal of time and energy into covering and analyzing the news as it happens. We are exceedingly grateful for their efforts and excited to convey their research through our websites, to ensure it reaches as many readers as possible.

We know that many of you have been forwarding our articles, posting them to blogs, linking up through Facebook and Twitter, watching GlobalResearchTV, and using various means at your disposal to share this timely and critical information, and we sincerely thank you for that and encourage you to increase your efforts. Change is coming and it is crucial that we stay “in the know”, now more than ever.

At the same time, we remind our readers that in order to maintain our websites and projects at Global Research, we rely 100% on the financial support of our readers. All that we do is entirely thanks to you.

Our mandate is to deliver articles and videos as broadly as possible, which is why you will never have to pay to access the information.

To do this, however, we rely entirely on your donations, memberships and book purchases.

If you have already purchased our books, how about picking up copies for friends and colleagues? You can make purchases directly through our Shop-cart or through Amazon.

And if you are already a member or have donated in the past, we kindly ask that you consider making another donation at this time. Every amount, great or small, contributes directly to our operations and ensures that we can be on top of important issues as they unfold.

We thank you for your readership and encourage you to visit our Shop-cart, Donation page and Membership page and find out how you can help Global Research continue to be the reliable source of completely independent news that you have come to rely on.

With appreciation and best wishes for true freedom,
The Global Research Team

There are different ways that you can support Global Research:

For online donations, please visit the DONATION PAGE:

 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS

I understand that many of you have busy lives and cannot do your own research, but you can arrange for the time it takes to read at least one site daily, and although Global Research has a few Authors I don’t trust, for the most part they do have some great writers, and as I had to; you must use common sense to ferret them out. Continued belief that America is the only good government on earth is suicide. They are the scum of the earth. MARK THOSE WORDS!

10 13 11 flagbar

FBI Orders Teachers To Report Students Who Question Government

March 9th, 2016 by

http://countercurrentnews.com/2016/03/fbi-orders-teachers-to-report-students

-who-question-government/

3-8-2016 9-16-33 PM

By M. David

New federal guidelines have just been introduced across the country, and what they mandate is quite disturbing to civil libertarians. The FBI has now instructed high schools across the nation to report students who in any way criticize government policies and what the report phrases as “western corruption. ”The FBI is interested in determining – as part of some warped “pre-crime” program – who might become potential future terrorists. The FBI warns in the report that that “anarchist extremists” are no different that ISIS terrorists.

They further caution teachers against young people who are poor, as well as immigrants and others who travel to “suspicious” countries. These, they explain, are teens who are more likely to commit terrorism.

Sarah Lazare, writing for AlterNet, notes that “based on the widely unpopular British ‘anti-terror’ mass surveillance program, the FBI’s ‘Preventing Violent Extremism in Schools’ guidelines, released in January, are almost certainly designed to single out and target Muslim-American communities.”

Lazare notes that the FBI cautions teachers to “avoid the appearance of discrimination,” in carrying out the order to spy on students and report them to the Bureau.

“The agency identifies risk factors that are so broad and vague that virtually any young person could be deemed dangerous and worthy of surveillance, especially if she is socio-economically marginalized or politically outspoken,” she notes.

This overwhelming threat is then used to justify a massive surveillance apparatus, wherein educators and pupils function as extensions of the FBI by watching and informing on each other.

The FBI’s justification for such surveillance is based on McCarthy-era theories of radicalization, in which authorities monitor thoughts and behaviors that they claim to lead to acts of violent subversion, even if those people being watched have not committed any wrongdoing. This model has been widely discredited as a violence prevention method, including by the US government, but it is now being imported to schools nationwide as official federal policy.

The new guidelines suggest that “high school students are ideal targets for recruitment by violent extremists seeking support for their radical ideologies, foreign fighter networks, or conducting acts of violence within our borders.”

The paranoid of the document warns that the youth “possess inherent risk factors” that predispose them to being terrorists.

The FBI suggests that all teachers “incorporate a two-hour block of violent extremism awareness training” into their core curriculum for all high school students in the United States.

According to the FBI’s educational materials for teenagers, circulated as a visual aide to their new guidelines, the following offenses constitute signs that “could mean that someone plans to commit violence” and therefore should be reported: “Talking about traveling to places that sound suspicious”; “Using code words or unusual language”; “Using several different cell phones and private messaging apps”; and “Studying or taking pictures of potential targets (like a government building).”

Under the category of domestic terrorists, the educational materials warn of the threat posed by “anarchist extremists.” The FBI states, “Anarchist extremists believe that society should have no government, laws, or police, and they are loosely organized, with no central leadership… Violent anarchist extremists usually target symbols of capitalism they believe to be the cause of all problems in society – such as large corporations, government organizations, and police agencies.”

But the FBI didn’t stop at the ISIS boogymanning. They warn teachers of “Animal Rights Extremists and Environmental Extremists” who are – to the FBI – no different than “white supremacy extremists,” ISIS and Al Qaeda terrorists.

All of these are “out to recruit high school students,” in the FBI’s mind, according to Lazare.

The materials also instruct students to watch out for extremist propaganda messages that communicate criticisms of “corrupt western nations” and express “government mistrust.”

If you “see suspicious behavior that might lead to violent extremism,” the resource states, consider reporting it to “someone you trust,” including local law enforcement officials like police officers and FBI agents.

Lazare posits that “young Muslims are the real targets” of the FBI’s high school spy program.

At the surface level, the FBI’s new guidelines do not appear to single out Muslim students. The document and supplementary educational materials warn of a broad array of threats, including anti-abortion and white supremacist extremists. The Jewish Defense League is listed alongside Hizbollah and Al Qaeda as an imminent danger to young people in the United States.

But a closer read reveals that the FBI consistently invokes an Islamic threat without naming it. Cultural and religious differences, as well as criticisms of western imperialism, are repeatedly mentioned as risk factors for future extremism. “Some immigrant families may not be sufficiently present in a youth’s life due to work constraints to foster critical thinking,” the guidelines state.

“The document aims to encourage schools to monitor their students more carefully for signs of radicalization but its definition of radicalization is vague,” Arun Kundnani, the author of The Muslims are Coming! Islamophobia, extremism, and the domestic War on Terror notes. “Drawing on the junk science of radicalization models, the document dangerously blurs the distinction between legitimate ideological expression and violent criminal actions.”

“In practice, schools seeking to implement this document will end up monitoring Muslim students disproportionately,” Kundnani said. “Muslims who access religious or political material will be seen as suspicious, even though there is no reason to think such material indicates a likelihood of terrorism.”

Oddly, however, the FBI’s new guidelines say that they do “not advocate the application of any psychological or demographic ‘profiles’ or check lists of indicators to identify students on a pathway to radicalization.”

As Hugh Handeyside, staff attorney for the ACLU’s national security project, said that “broadening the definition of violent extremism to include a range of belief-driven violence underscores that the FBI is diving head-first into community spying. Framing this conduct as ‘concerning behavior’ doesn’t conceal the fact that the FBI is policing students’ thoughts and trying to predict the future based on those thoughts.”

Are you concerned about the FBI’s new “pre-crime” high school spying program?

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

Is there any level this government will not stoop to? How can we as a Nation survive if we have not the courage to attack this insult to our people and theft of our dignity.

10 13 11 flagbar

Just Shut Up and Vote: The Futility of Representative Government in an Age of Robber Barons

March 8th, 2016 by

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f6eb78f457b7b82887b643445&id=fb0956c031&e=84f74f6a6a

By John W. Whitehead

“That’s the way the ruling class operates in any society. They keep the lower and the middle classes fighting with each other… Anything different—that’s what they’re gonna talk about—race, religion, ethnic and national background, jobs, income, education, social status, sexuality, anything they can do to keep us fighting with each other, so that they can keep going to the bank!”—Comedian George Carlin

“We the people” have been utterly and completely betrayed.
The politicians “we the people” most trusted to look out for our best interests, protect our rights, and ensure that the nation does not slip into tyranny have cheated on us, lied to us, swindled us, deceived us, double-crossed us, and sold us to the highest bidder.

Time and again, they have shown in word and deed that their priorities lay elsewhere, that they care nothing about our plight, that they owe us no allegiance, that they are motivated by power and money rather than principle, that they are deaf to our entreaties, that they are part of an elite ruling class that views us as mere cattle, that their partisan bickering is part of an elaborate ruse to keep us divided and distracted, and that their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution mean nothing.
Incredibly, even in the face of their treachery and lies, the great majority of Americans persist in believing that the politicians have the people’s best interests at heart.

Despite the fact that we’ve been burned before, most Americans continue to allow themselves to be bamboozled into casting their votes for one candidate or another, believing that this time they mean what they say, this time they really care about the citizenry, this time will be different.

Of course, they rarely ever mean what they say, they care about their constituents only to the extent that it advances their political careers, and it never turns out differently. We are as easily discarded the day after the elections as we were wantonly wooed in the months leading up to the big day. Those same politicians who were once so eager to pose for our pictures, smile at our jokes, and glad-hand us for our votes will, upon being elected, retreat behind a massive, impenetrable wall that ensures we are not seen or heard from again—at least, until the next election.

The joke is on us.

As I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, all of the caucuses, primaries, nominating conventions, town hall meetings, rallies, meet and greets, delegates and super-delegates are sophisticated schemes aimed at advancing the illusion of participation culminating in the reassurance ritual of voting.

It’s not about Red Republicans or Blue Democrats. It’s about Green Donors—i.e, those with money who can afford to pay for access.

Votes might elect politicians, but as a 2014 field experiment by political scientists at Yale University and the University of California, Berkeley, makes clear, it’s money that talks.

The experiment went something like this: members of Congress were contacted by constituents requesting meetings about pending public policy issues. As the Washington Post reports, “When the attendees were revealed to be ‘local campaign donors,’ they often gained access to Members of Congress, Legislative Directors, and Chiefs of Staff. But when the attendees were described as only ‘local constituents,’ they almost never gained this level of access.”
Conclusion: money buys access to politicians who are otherwise deaf, dumb and blind to the entreaties of their constituents.
It works the same with every politician and every party.
Indeed, the First Amendment’s assurance of a right to petition the government for a redress of grievances has become predicated on how much money you’re willing to shell out in order to gain access to your elected and appointed officials.

Then again, money has always played a starring role in American politics.

The spoils system reared its greedy head under Andrew Jackson, who traded jobs in his administration in exchange for campaign contributions. For $1 million, donors could take part in Warren Harding’s poker parties and enjoy a sleepover at the White House. Lyndon Johnson had a President’s Club that cost donors $1000 a year. Nixon was prepared to sell ambassadorships for $250,000. And Bill Clinton famously allowed top-dollar donors to spend a night in the Lincoln Bedroom at the White House in exchange for roughly $5.4 million in donations to the Democratic National Committee.
Fast forward to the present day, and a $500,000 donation might get you invited to a quarterly meeting with Barack Obama. For a mere $5,000 donation, lobbyists are being given exclusive invitations to join Congressmen and senators for weekend getaways that include wine tastings, fly fishing, skiing, golfing, hunting, spas, seaside cocktail parties and more.

If you’re just a lowly citizen with limited cash, however, you’re out of luck.

Try contacting your so-called representatives without paying for the privilege, and see how far that gets you. I can assure you that you won’t be given the kinds of access that lobbyists, special interest groups and top donors enjoy.
Having been saddled with a pay-to-play system that provides access only to those with enough cash to grease the wheels of the political machine, average Americans have little to no say in the workings of their government and even less access to their so-called representatives.

Donald Trump, as he has boasted, might be able to buy and sell politicians of all stripes (including Hillary Clinton), but the average American would be hard-pressed to get the kind of access enjoyed by corporate executives, lobbyists and other members of the moneyed elite.

Indeed, members of Congress have to work hard to keep their constituents at a distance—minimizing town-hall meetings, making minimal public appearances while at home in their districts, only appearing at events in controlled settings where they’re the only ones talking, and if they must interact with constituents, doing so via telephone town meetings or impromptu visits to local businesses where the chances of being accosted by angry voters are greatly minimized.
And under the Trespass Bill, passed by Congress in 2012 and signed into law by President Obama, if you dare to exercise your First Amendment right to speak freely to a politician, assemble in public near a politician, or petition a government official for a redress of grievances, you risk a fine or a lengthy stay in prison.

Talk about self-serving.

Under the guise of protecting government officials from physical attacks, the Trespass Bill, a.k.a. “the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act,” criminalizes First Amendment activity by making it a federal offense, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, to protest anywhere the Secret Service might be guarding someone.
Mind you, the Secret Service not only protects the president but all past sitting presidents, members of Congress, foreign dignitaries, presidential candidates, and anyone whom the president determines needs protection, but is also in charge of securing National Special Security Events, which include events such as the G8 and NATO summits, the National Conventions of both major parties, and even the Super Bowl.

The law essentially creates a roving bubble zone where the First Amendment is effectively off-limits, thereby putting an end to free speech, political protest and the right to peaceably assemble in all areas where government officials happen to be present. Thus, simply walking by one of these events could make you subject to arrest.

“What that means in practice,” as The Intercept rightly points out, “is that campaign rallies for Donald Trump, who was granted Secret Service protection in November, and Hillary Clinton, who will be guarded for life as a former first lady, are the very opposite of free speech zones under federal law. (The restrictions also apply to all appearances by former presidents and first ladies, as well as those of two other candidates, Bernie Sanders and Ben Carson, who are currently protected by the service.)”

Consider yourself warned: If you do dare to show up to a Trump or Clinton rally and even appear to be the kind of person who might engage in any kind of protest, lawful or otherwise, you could find yourself quickly dispatched to a “free speech zone” out of sight and sound of the candidates. (“Free speech zones” are government-sanctioned areas located far away from government officials, into which activists and citizens are herded at political rallies and events.) In fact, that’s exactly what happened to a group of black students at a recent Trump rally in Georgia. They were escorted by police to “‘free speech zones’ in a field shielded from the venue by a set of tennis courts, or outside a church about a quarter of a mile away.”

The message is clear: in an age of robber barons, “we the people” are expected to just shut up and vote.

The powers-that-be want us to be censored, silenced, muzzled, gagged, zoned out, caged in and shut down. They want our speech and activities monitored for any sign of “extremist” activity. They want us to be estranged from each other and kept at a distance from those who are supposed to represent us. They want taxation without representation. They want a government without the consent of the governed.

They want the police state.

The system has been so corrupted and compromised that there are few left in the halls of government who hear or speak for us.
Congress does not represent us. The courts do not advocate for us. The president does not listen to us. And the First Amendment’s assurance of the right to speak freely and petition our government for a redress of grievance no longer applies to us.

So if representative government has become an exercise in futility, where does that leave us?
One of the key ingredients in maintaining democratic government is the right of citizens to freely speak their minds to those who represent them. In fact, it is one of the few effective tools we have left to combat government corruption and demand accountability.

If there is to be any hope of righting the wrongs that are being perpetrated against the American people, we must make them—our elected officials—hear us.

But where to begin?

Start by opening up a dialogue within your own community about what’s wrong with this country. Stop focusing on the issues that divide, and find common ground with your fellow citizens about issues on which you can agree. Focus less on politics and more on principles. Stop buying into the false and divisive narratives that are being promulgated by political windbags and start thinking and speaking for yourselves.

Once you’ve found that common ground, whatever it might be, make enough noise at the local level—at your city council meetings, in your local paper, at your school board meetings, in front of your courthouses and police stations—and the message will trickle up. Those in power may not like what they hear, but they will hear you.
Remember, there is power in numbers.

There are 319 million of us in this country. Imagine what we could accomplish if we actually worked together, presented a united front, and spoke with one voice?

The police state wouldn’t stand a chance.


 

OLDDOGS COMMENTS!

I have to admit; I would follow this man around like a puppy if he would only tell you the truth about American governance. John when are you going to inform the people they do not have a democratic government? It is a tri-party oligarchy totally owned and controlled by the City of London Bankers, the Queen of England, and the Pope! Go to this web site and start your own search for truth: http://www.annavonreitz.com/  Buy this book and get all the details in one short read. You Know Something is Wrong When…..: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause (Paperback) by Judge Anna Maria Riezinger & James Clinton Belcher http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1491279184/ref=cm_cr_asin_lnk

10 13 11 flagbar


Pages: 1 2 Next
SEO Powered By SEOPressor